ubffm/academic_main_text_classifier_en_annotated

labels int64 0 3	text stringlengths 1 1.23k
0	& b = an individual two-topic picker
2	(13) WH x P = {Peter I Fritz I Clara) x {x stroke the cat I x did not stroke the cat}
2	( i ) Keren lai-le.
2	(1) a. Karen has recently been buying first-aid supplies.
1	‘nose-bombing, belly-splitting stench’ (83), ‘slimy buckets’ (83), ‘the shit-dump’
1	with her profession and lingering suffering. Thereafter, Maude became practically a
0	7835
0	� ð <3F ð <3lG,E? ð <3K ð7N3Q 2%4 ô«ùlù_ô«ù¡g¡ô[g¡ù_ô[g�zRôûsg¡ô ûdy¡ô3xZû
1	than about the rigid semantics of proper names, and I get similar conclusions from Stalnaker’s
0	-15
0	1.352.643
0	1734
1	"Planning, Organising and Evaluating"
1	"I ask others to clarify that I have understood or said something conectly."
0	�� !��!� ��.��
1	participate in the selections of those micro symbols in their environments that can be
3	— Have you been there?
1	may be acutely relevant to dismiss such presuppositions if they are not obviously satisfied.)
2	14)c “Oh moon, mother me in the surging valley
1	5.4. Discourse representation
2	� word - misspelling / mispronunciation
1	significantly to the poet’s ability to elicit the reader’s support/participation in the
2	(= DOM from German Diflereiztielle Objektnzurkier~mg, Bossong 1985). DOM is the
1	2See Fabb (1990) and Huddleston and Pullum (2002: Chapter 7) for an overview of differences between RRCs
2	(< Æsitfl + nominalizer, used
1	characteristic of hunters.
0	726
1	"Strange. Let us say, rumors about a monk who decided to venture into the
1	or political information. The poet may then he regarded as:
1	modifier” as QUALIFIER. Some of the components of the pre-modifiers fall into the
2	Table 9 Wavelengths and fundamental frequencies of the eight vowels
2	(16) Basic Assumption of Constructive Plural Disambiguation in ACE
2	a. 73i See(william, E,X [book(x)])
2	(1) (a) rùuà ‘confuse’ - kùyàngií ‘women of harem’
1	(14)). In other words, from CS, O, andWCS , (14) fixes whether CS is a cause of O, ‘regardless of
0	906
1	implications of the piece. Evidently, nobody ever trusts in enemy with anything
0	13.433
1	'' Neither in this nor in any other representation of this paper does the existential operator express
0	32
1	put the reader in the various situations being described, communicative value is
2	(14) weil sie schüchtern einen Prinzen geküßt hat
0	931
0	g H 0.22790 444.191 916.905 3870.66
1	'' This principle reads: It' an operator A has scope over B at SS, thcn A has scope over B at LF. Based
3	Linguistics and Nigerian Languages, University of Nigeria.
1	ging and another person being hugged. For these cases, the denotation of hug will also contain
0	-21
0	606
2	(14)EI profesor de danza despidi6 a Marfa llorosos_L
1	drooping orb/the moon’s face is a well of tears” (‘The Stars Sob’; VV 15) fully
2	(15) a. U: Bill wondered who was kissed by an oyster
1	more important to observe three things. Firstly, this semantic notion of answerhood underlies a
1	of the resulting sentence after the existential binding of the topic situation is represented in
1	well as to adjectives, although the instrumental occurs less frequently with adjectives than
1	pronoun; the second is the deletion of the indirect marker and, then
0	# User: Uta Schwertel
0	467
1	� Incremental use
1	avoids making direct reference to the sexual act between the modern-day teacher and
3	- (1994): The Language Instinct. NY: Morrow.
0	(11%) (26%) (31%) (32%)
1	derogatory:
0	�� (�)+� �� ��
2	(162) a) * The [XP [opinion of Johni]2 [CP [Op [ ]2]1 that hei has
0	�� :��
1	achieved in Ngwa hunting poetry by the chanter deviating from the normal use of
1	(1), we could envision a partition by volume, as in (33).
2	(13) A wine glass broke last night. The glass had been very expensive.
1	her husband’s fall. The existence of children in the union, which ordinarily should
2	Daa Roozu lei
0	��!��$��#�0��+�*��
1	is with revenue accruing to the media. Whatever the audience do not approve of is
1	observes that competent communicators are always engaged in the exercise of
0	& (allUnEd$sHpitchST < allUnEd$vHpitchST)
1	occupations at the same time. In (1a) the property of being a singer is presented as one of
1	Folarin’s perspective corroborates McLuhan’s (1965:204) that the press can colour
0	10.290
1	and help sustain the interest of readers.
1	"Akiuate that fish , the blood ofwhich dripped. r
0	160.385
1	(14) basically states that durch itself adds no content to the DRS, but that it involves a causal
2	(1) Two approaches to degrees: primitive vs. complex
1	non-specific reading. The classical approach to this contrast is by means of different
1	(11) J ohn was touched by Mary
1	are inclined to put the nativity of ballad-like poetry outside the so-called “dark”
1	which can be cancelled of course. (Like we saw before in our discussion of example (18), it
0	888
0	935
0	-90
0	18.077
1	The following examples typically have a ‘mention some’ interpretation:
0	� �� ðMû�ã ��ã î è8å�ü&ï�ð.è_å®ã�ìjéëì
0	�� .��*��(��)'��1�
1	are used to add questions, in the semantic sense described in the previous section (Ginzburg
0	! 100)
2	Ó sò mgbe m gbùru yá. He was in my company when I killed it.
2	Ányi  nwòoru íf è anyi  na-ejì We had weapons for hunting game.
0	341
1	chanter, describe it as an animal with ‘great horn’ with which it kicks to death.

0

& b = an individual two-topic picker

2

(13) WH x P = {Peter I Fritz I Clara) x {x stroke the cat I x did not stroke the cat}

2

( i ) Keren lai-le.

2

(1) a. Karen has recently been buying first-aid supplies.

1

‘nose-bombing, belly-splitting stench’ (83), ‘slimy buckets’ (83), ‘the shit-dump’

1

with her profession and lingering suffering. Thereafter, Maude became practically a

0

7835

0

� ð <3F ð <3lG,E? ð <3K ð7N3Q 2%4 ô«ùlù_ô«ù¡g¡ô[g¡ù_ô[g�zRôûsg¡ô ûdy¡ô3xZû

1

than about the rigid semantics of proper names, and I get similar conclusions from Stalnaker’s

0

-15

0

1.352.643

0

1734

1

"Planning, Organising and Evaluating"

1

"I ask others to clarify that I have understood or said something conectly."

0

�� !��!� ��.��

1

participate in the selections of those micro symbols in their environments that can be

3

— Have you been there?

1

may be acutely relevant to dismiss such presuppositions if they are not obviously satisfied.)

2

14)c “Oh moon, mother me in the surging valley

1

5.4. Discourse representation

2

� word - misspelling / mispronunciation

1

significantly to the poet’s ability to elicit the reader’s support/participation in the

2

(= DOM from German Diflereiztielle Objektnzurkier~mg, Bossong 1985). DOM is the

1

2See Fabb (1990) and Huddleston and Pullum (2002: Chapter 7) for an overview of differences between RRCs

2

(< Æsitfl + nominalizer, used

1

characteristic of hunters.

0

726

1

"Strange. Let us say, rumors about a monk who decided to venture into the

1

or political information. The poet may then he regarded as:

1

modifier” as QUALIFIER. Some of the components of the pre-modifiers fall into the

2

Table 9 Wavelengths and fundamental frequencies of the eight vowels

2

(16) Basic Assumption of Constructive Plural Disambiguation in ACE

2

a. 73i See(william, E,X [book(x)])

2

(1) (a) rùuà ‘confuse’ - kùyàngií ‘women of harem’

1

(14)). In other words, from CS, O, andWCS , (14) fixes whether CS is a cause of O, ‘regardless of

0

906

1

implications of the piece. Evidently, nobody ever trusts in enemy with anything

0

13.433

1

'' Neither in this nor in any other representation of this paper does the existential operator express

0

32

1

put the reader in the various situations being described, communicative value is

2

(14) weil sie schüchtern einen Prinzen geküßt hat

0

931

0

g H 0.22790 444.191 916.905 3870.66

1

'' This principle reads: It' an operator A has scope over B at SS, thcn A has scope over B at LF. Based

3

Linguistics and Nigerian Languages, University of Nigeria.

1

ging and another person being hugged. For these cases, the denotation of hug will also contain

0

-21

0

606

2

(14)EI profesor de danza despidi6 a Marfa llorosos_L

1

drooping orb/the moon’s face is a well of tears” (‘The Stars Sob’; VV 15) fully

2

(15) a. U: Bill wondered who was kissed by an oyster

1

more important to observe three things. Firstly, this semantic notion of answerhood underlies a

1

of the resulting sentence after the existential binding of the topic situation is represented in

1

well as to adjectives, although the instrumental occurs less frequently with adjectives than

1

pronoun; the second is the deletion of the indirect marker and, then

0

# User: Uta Schwertel

0

467

1

� Incremental use

1

avoids making direct reference to the sexual act between the modern-day teacher and

3

- (1994): The Language Instinct. NY: Morrow.

0

(11%) (26%) (31%) (32%)

1

derogatory:

0

�� (*�)+� �� *��

2

(162) a) * The [XP [opinion of Johni]2 [CP [Op [ ]2]1 that hei has

0

�� :��

1

achieved in Ngwa hunting poetry by the chanter deviating from the normal use of

1

(1), we could envision a partition by volume, as in (33).

2

(13) A wine glass broke last night. The glass had been very expensive.

1

her husband’s fall. The existence of children in the union, which ordinarily should

2

Daa Roozu lei

0

��!��$��#�0��+�*��

1

is with revenue accruing to the media. Whatever the audience do not approve of is

1

observes that competent communicators are always engaged in the exercise of

0

& (allUnEd$sHpitchST < allUnEd$vHpitchST)

1

occupations at the same time. In (1a) the property of being a singer is presented as one of

1

Folarin’s perspective corroborates McLuhan’s (1965:204) that the press can colour

0

10.290

1

and help sustain the interest of readers.

1

"Akiuate that fish , the blood ofwhich dripped. r

0

160.385

1

(14) basically states that durch itself adds no content to the DRS, but that it involves a causal

2

(1) Two approaches to degrees: primitive vs. complex

1

non-specific reading. The classical approach to this contrast is by means of different

1

(11) J ohn was touched by Mary

1

are inclined to put the nativity of ballad-like poetry outside the so-called “dark”

1

which can be cancelled of course. (Like we saw before in our discussion of example (18), it

0

888

0

935

0

-90

0

18.077

1

The following examples typically have a ‘mention some’ interpretation:

0

� �� ðMû�ã ��ã î è8å�ü&ï�ð.è_å®ã�ìjéëì

0

�� .��*��(��)'��1�

1

are used to add questions, in the semantic sense described in the previous section (Ginzburg

0

! 100)

2

Ó sò mgbe m gbùru yá. He was in my company when I killed it.

2

Ányi  nwòoru íf è anyi  na-ejì We had weapons for hunting game.

0

341

1

chanter, describe it as an animal with ‘great horn’ with which it kicks to death.