labels
int64
0
3
text
stringlengths
1
1.23k
1
oriented. This tends to establish the picture of a patron-client relationship that could
1
61. An Optimality Analysis of Tone and Vowel Harmony in Oworo
0
49
1
reader’s attentions and interest. Because they are locative cues which the poet uses to
0
(1)F
0
� ÜG#p��[��|íÖá>rMß���r�v=yQq�àJv"wnàQt�v=á s�q�v=sGá3r�}8ì�ð z
1
and mind of other fellow men, and endlessly challenged their imagination. They
2
(15) a. Ken painted #(a picture of) a camel. It is exhibited in the Louvre.
1
from the novel’s many themes, this critical attitude also permeates the novel’s
1
The Igbo Satiric Poetry 459
1
constraint because the H tone is unparsed and this makes two identical L
0
� ö � ò�ð F32B? ô&8 ök5oQ 412B< ôk|î8 ö�å÷ðxñ <
2
Examples of lexical matching are reflected in the combination of these words:
1
same message in local languages will not necessarily be perceived differently. Two
1
of t he mythical conflict between Ogun Lakaaye, the Yoruba god of Iron, war and
1
ATR] specification is aligned with the left edge of the ATR DOMAIN.
1
"' This is not to say that all fnctives allow exclamative complemcnts. For instance, regret doesn't allow
2
2a. ni + o + nas => no nas ‘cloth owner’
0
(1.40)
1
number of tones and that what happens to the TBU need not happen to the
1
multicultural ideas and behaviour especially in the fields of learning, ethics and
0
�� LOC 3 � DRS � CONDS� 1 ,. . . ��� , INH � REL � 1 �� ,
1
formula for calculating the wavelength is λ=C/F; where λ is the wavelength,
1
"brightness" and hence targets only the brightness dimension of the modified concept "green",
2
(=strong)
3
at the Amsterdam Colloquium 2009.
2
b. aru a r u
1
# None of it means, however, . . .
1
that assigns one element to each set." In other words, the referent of an indefinite NP
0
-98
1
However, it is very important to state that the poet does not necessarily resort to
2
(142) the man [who/Op]1 I like [who/Op]1
1
ric predicates from Winter (2016). We derive two empirical hypotheses from these two sec-
0
Jan 77
1
speaker. The speaker uses estar in such a context to express the difference between the
0
50
0
#16J00637.
1
This analysis not only simplifies the analysis of symmetric predicates from Winter (2016) in
0
� ò /1/ ð 4@/12 QPQ ò¡ô
0
626 Language, Literature & Culture in a Multilingual Society
0
Sep 01
1
some other NP in the clause. The instrumental case can also be used with non-predicate NPs. The correlation
0
-112
3
Press. Vol. 4, 291-330.
0
445
2
process and the circumstance. (See Halliday 1970, 1971, 1973). The nominal
0
665
3
Dissertation, MIT.
1
of the predication to a specific topic situation, while ser in Spanish and nominative case in
2
When a matchless darkness couples earth and sky (‘Dawncall’ 39).
2
she hit him *taa maakàs 'she hit him hard'
1
involvement that creates deep informality in the volumes. As if to show that he
0
12.356
1
([plur:+]). However, both share the property of having a lattice structure i.e. Latt:+125. In terms
2
↓ ↓ ↓
1
� Notional classes:
2
7) Count your colours, oh chameleon,
1
Inaccuracies were also evident in foreign media accounts of the causes of the
0
28.077
1
argument relation that connects "emit" with "light" has to be inherited by the subconcepts of
0
459
1
chi square statistics were also applied to further illuminate the identified significant
0
18.992
0
951
1
5.2. Lexical ambiguity approach
1
Ngwa Igbo Hunting Poetry 453
1
acceptability of NRCs with SpAs but not the acceptability of RRCs with SpAs.
1
This is a way of exaggerating a word or an expression, so that it becomes mightier or
2
Ndi ka ibe nnyo ma-eji
1
Urbanites are guided by generally different criteria from ruralites in their
0
196
0
"A typhoon!" called Lukas the captain to. "Here is he!" Yes, here was
0
b H 0.39477 447.815 1883.11 4102.94
2
(1) a. Àkwai ruwaa à buutàa. ‘There is water in the keg.’
1
there may be misunderstanding, suspicion, and therefore, distrust and non-acceptance
1
(13) plants dry individuals
1
case of “monkey de-work baboon-dey-chop” except that in this case, it goes beyond
3
Sells, P. (1985). Restrictive and Non-restrictive Modification. Number 85-28 in CSLI Report.
1
in (1a) describes only one facet, one part of the person. The right paraphrase for this reading
1
The careful reader will have noticed that the original well-formed examples of SpA-construal
1
Mother the user of the very long strap.
1
way suggested by Maienborn (2003/05). First, I will show how the semantic derivation works
0
­ µn  ­7%=ª�© ­ ¬3¡$­Q¯p �§�§p®:« ¬ ®n¬�*M¯pÏ�¬C�n¨=¬>¨Ö  «Q¬f©$¡�¬C­�®Aª�¯d°- �§Z°"©$¡$­ ¬v*A­�Èg©�«Ö�n¨=¬U©�ȶ  ¡P¬-Î�ª�µn �­Q¯p°É'IÆ�  ¡n±&ÆR �¨
0
��������������!���+� ���!����$����"�����������&�#'2B�/�������������
0
961
1
adhered to) stipulates a linking which moves from left – to – right edge.
1
(11c). Simply put, p is a relevant answer to Q if upon strengthening to EXH(p), it identifies a
1
Introduction
1
' That it is the sluicing clause that is moved to SpecCP of the matrix clause was also shown by
2
(13) It would take us years to {find/drink} the champagne {that / ∅ / *which} they spilled
1
the relationship between the government and the governed or affect the standard of
0
"enseignements") sont les seuls disponibles, ou s'il en existe d'autres (les trois petits
1
between (2b) and (3) but did not say anything about the contrast between (1) and (2a). Our
0
�� �$�4���
1
Autosegmental analysis of tone requires that tones and the CV segments
3
271–309.
0
Copular Sentences in Russian vs. Spanish at the Syntax–Semantics Interface 101
2
(19) Arms will not come, but Baker does.. . .
0
������ ���!������!�� ���
0
% »