ubffm/academic_main_text_classifier_en_annotated

labels int64 0 3	text stringlengths 1 1.23k
1	(16) would be insensitive to the linguistic form of the taster and apply to sentences with overt
2	(10) Hat siese aufgemacht? (Schulz et al. 2001: 412)
2	tu 702.674515
2	Those that I use to boast
2	(20) Wie kommen Alex und Chris heute nach Hause?
1	set of recommended books can contain more than one book. It is the choice function
3	EJOLLS Vol. 9, 1999, 23-29.
1	each language chooses to go either from left-to-right or from right-to-left,
2	' h o l e that this difference has an intonational reflex in that John will carry the nuclear pitch accent in
0	%��!��$��'��
1	people who, by their bearing, might and mind, have impressed themselves on the eye
1	- ‘referring’, either linguistically/textually or deictically, when the
1	initial adjuncts; cf. (26a/b). Like predicates in copular sentences, such adjuncts can also occur
1	pairs whose first element is the hugger and whose second the ‘huggee’.5
0	&2>/�� '�&��$��Q��(
2	%eng: I shall not, you break it, I shall not repair:FUT:IMP
1	Discourse representation theories (Karttunen 1976, Heim 1982, Kamp 1981) assume
2	(17) /kn/ → [k] ‘leg’
0	�� .��
3	Geuder, W.: 2004, Depictives and Transparent Adverbs, in J. Austin, S. Engelberg & G. Rauh
3	Abrams, M.H. (1988). A Glossary of Literary Term. London; Holt, Rinehart and
0	1660
0	13.319
1	reasons why message designs for rural broadcasting have failed, the need to design
1	feature that is to some extent a dynamic, hence eventive, feature. While this feature is not
2	& +BE_OPEN(y) & HD(window, y) & 1:(y) 2': 5minJ]
1	- Idon in Kachia LGA with a small number of speakers (Crozier and
2	(adapted from Nouwen 2007)
0	��!��$��"��
1	" For details see Renzi '1991. Besides this general sketch of indefinite descriptions, Modern Italian
1	expression depends on the "anchor" expression. Once the reference for the anchored is
1	the well-formedness of analyses…”
0	100%
1	impression created in our minds not to be forgotten easily. Created imagery is
1	but also punish man (Denys, 1974:43).
1	"Semi-Autonomous Language Learning Unit" at Dublin City University. Here students have
0	��!� ��+�'��&��0��$��$$��'�
1	feature F is aligned with the left edge of the harmonic domain D.
1	anchored to some discourse item. So we can analyze the readings of (59) as the non-
2	L H L = mǎ kò ‘going’
2	‘Today precisely that cat got along with precisely that dog again who had quarreled
2	(11) a. Johni [ti ran [the pavement thin]].
1	way of the singer Donna Summer’s conversion ‘from Pub to Pew’. The same aim
1	because they have relatively low F2. However, /u/ and // are more rounded
0	-175
0	27.429
1	(`Subj_2', `Verb_2' and `Obj_2', see Table 2.11). Since the dependent
1	is the same as the one Spanish expresses through the selection of the copula verb in
1	& Strigin 2003). No such contrast is implied in (26b) with nominative case. This is what our
0	�� $
1	demonstratives and articles, he also strives for tenor relations: “The nerves have gone
1	"open" 63 46.349 8.77 1.105
0	!!��+� 6776/'� @�!�� 0��*+� ��
2	(14) Wo yi ge ren dou bu jiedai.
0	� ö�í"ï�ì"é��ëòJô î ï°è�éKòJì°éÜò7øÀûWû ö�ì�ï�è�éæìPì°éæí°éMòÀì°ñ^èÂòJî�ó(S�ó�ødî�øJï2÷WòJîUïPï�ø7ó�÷Té$�E��øùî ô ïè�éÜì°é.�Tí°ôõî�ñÜé7òÀîºé ��ê�� òJîDòþï�ôõøJîÂøJû�ó�ô�� éÜì"éÜîUï�ô ò.�WñMòÀí°éi�KòÀì°úðôõî��8ôõí;î�øJï��:%�ö��ªï�ô��ëòÀï°é
1	'" I have to thank Pr<,fcssor Liu Danqing (Bcijing) for most of these facts (p.c.). See also Chen &
0	427
1	Apart from ownership as a basis of choice, programme type and general
1	reports on the cause of the Kano crisis is, however, narrower than the case with
1	Nigeria, they are considered inconsequential or not newsworthy.
1	above, our protagonist may be wondering whether or not go to the banquet, and whether or not
1	& Zanuttini 2003), then IP raising is necessary for the intended interpretation
0	�� .�� !�!� ��$�� . � �� '� 1�
1	are replacing a referential operator and they can depend on other linguistic expressions.
0	� éMòÀì°î�ô î��GóDòÀï�òG÷-éÜì°éaï°è�é�û ì°é$�ðö�éÜî�ñæôõéæí=ôõî2� [�#�?��
2	(11) Downdrift
1	factors.
0	� ibudo-agbara (energy site)
1	I will proceed as follows. In the first two sections I present the basic concepts of the semantics
0	% non-modal vq. −0.9183 0.2139 −4.2923
3	& Kratzer (1998: 66) assume in their discussion of a Functional Application (FA) alternative to their
1	whenever he becomes inspired, he finds it difficult to keep quiet. ibis is perhaps why
2	≡ λz [z INST [SINGLE(Jacinta)] / [R(z, si)]]
0	503
1	is in the fact that the items themselves have been put together from oral tradition,
1	(1993:5);
0	---------------------------- Variables in the Equation ----------------------------
0	1.061.124
0	12.576
1	As we can see here only the first person singular and third person
0	-64
2	È jidhé m là so váyi vàalu  lévì. They arrest me for survival levy
2	accounts for the term, the NGP, or ‘Nominal Group’. After the “Categories” stage
0	825
2	(15) Ich hoffe von [diesem Buch], dass es ein Erfolg wird.
0	�� E
1	abuse, and wrong-headed destruction of African ideals in favour of Western concepts
1	universal phrase each student in (50) cannot receive wide scope due to an island
0	��!� �� &2�+./+� �� %�� $�� 0�� �� #�� %��
1	Hunters also praise their dogs, simply to motivate the dogs and spur them into
1	degrees and that this makes K-states produce relatively weaker deviations.
0	� ÜG#���� ÞÖá ß
2	(16) Traurig, das bin ich schon.
0	11.505
1	confers on the novels their disorderly and scatological texture.
2	(17) PrP
1	assumes that the reader already has fore-knowledge of what he is saying.
0	---- 2014.3.8
2	(1 6 ) G ~ v ~ ~ n e s s
1	From the background of the characterisation of events in (1), Maienborn (2004) adduces a

1

(16) would be insensitive to the linguistic form of the taster and apply to sentences with overt

2

(10) Hat siese aufgemacht? (Schulz et al. 2001: 412)

2

tu 702.674515

2

Those that I use to boast

2

(20) Wie kommen Alex und Chris heute nach Hause?

1

set of recommended books can contain more than one book. It is the choice function

3

EJOLLS Vol. 9, 1999, 23-29.

1

each language chooses to go either from left-to-right or from right-to-left,

2

' h o l e that this difference has an intonational reflex in that John will carry the nuclear pitch accent in

0

%��!��$��'��

1

people who, by their bearing, might and mind, have impressed themselves on the eye

1

- ‘referring’, either linguistically/textually or deictically, when the

1

initial adjuncts; cf. (26a/b). Like predicates in copular sentences, such adjuncts can also occur

1

pairs whose first element is the hugger and whose second the ‘huggee’.5

0

&2>/�� '�&��$��Q��(

2

%eng: I shall not, you break it, I shall not repair:FUT:IMP

1

Discourse representation theories (Karttunen 1976, Heim 1982, Kamp 1981) assume

2

(17) /kn/ → [k] ‘leg’

0

�� .��

3

Geuder, W.: 2004, Depictives and Transparent Adverbs, in J. Austin, S. Engelberg & G. Rauh

3

Abrams, M.H. (1988). A Glossary of Literary Term. London; Holt, Rinehart and

0

1660

0

13.319

1

reasons why message designs for rural broadcasting have failed, the need to design

1

feature that is to some extent a dynamic, hence eventive, feature. While this feature is not

2

& +BE_OPEN(y) & HD(window, y) & 1:(y) 2': 5minJ]

1

- Idon in Kachia LGA with a small number of speakers (Crozier and

2

(adapted from Nouwen 2007)

0

��!��$��"��

1

" For details see Renzi '1991. Besides this general sketch of indefinite descriptions, Modern Italian

1

expression depends on the "anchor" expression. Once the reference for the anchored is

1

the well-formedness of analyses…”

0

100%

1

impression created in our minds not to be forgotten easily. Created imagery is

1

but also punish man (Denys, 1974:43).

1

"Semi-Autonomous Language Learning Unit" at Dublin City University. Here students have

0

��!� ��+�'��&��0��$��$$��'�

1

feature F is aligned with the left edge of the harmonic domain D.

1

anchored to some discourse item. So we can analyze the readings of (59) as the non-

2

L H L = mǎ kò ‘going’

2

‘Today precisely that cat got along with precisely that dog again who had quarreled

2

(11) a. Johni [ti ran [the pavement thin]].

1

way of the singer Donna Summer’s conversion ‘from Pub to Pew’. The same aim

1

because they have relatively low F2. However, /u/ and // are more rounded

0

-175

0

27.429

1

(`Subj_2', `Verb_2' and `Obj_2', see Table 2.11). Since the dependent

1

is the same as the one Spanish expresses through the selection of the copula verb in

1

& Strigin 2003). No such contrast is implied in (26b) with nominative case. This is what our

0

�� $

1

demonstratives and articles, he also strives for tenor relations: “The nerves have gone

1

"open" 63 46.349 8.77 1.105

0

!!��+� 6776/'� @�!�� 0��*+� ��

2

(14) Wo yi ge ren dou bu jiedai.

0

� ö�í"ï�ì"é��ëòJô î ï°è�éKòJì°éÜò7øÀûWû ö�ì�ï�è�éæìPì°éæí°éMòÀì°ñ^èÂòJî�ó(S�ó�ødî�øJï2÷WòJîUïPï�ø7ó�÷Té$�E��øùî ô ïè�éÜì°é.�Tí°ôõî�ñÜé7òÀîºé ��ê�� òJîDòþï�ôõøJîÂøJû�ó�ô�� éÜì"éÜîUï�ô ò.�WñMòÀí°éi�KòÀì°úðôõî��8ôõí;î�øJï��:%�ö��ªï�ô��ëòÀï°é

1

'" I have to thank Pr<,fcssor Liu Danqing (Bcijing) for most of these facts (p.c.). See also Chen &

0

427

1

Apart from ownership as a basis of choice, programme type and general

1

reports on the cause of the Kano crisis is, however, narrower than the case with

1

Nigeria, they are considered inconsequential or not newsworthy.

1

above, our protagonist may be wondering whether or not go to the banquet, and whether or not

1

& Zanuttini 2003), then IP raising is necessary for the intended interpretation

0

�� .�� !�!� ��$�� . � �� '� 1�

1

are replacing a referential operator and they can depend on other linguistic expressions.

0

� éMòÀì°î�ô î��GóDòÀï�òG÷-éÜì°éaï°è�é�û ì°é$�ðö�éÜî�ñæôõéæí=ôõî2� [�#�?��

2

(11) Downdrift

1

factors.

0

� ibudo-agbara (energy site)

1

I will proceed as follows. In the first two sections I present the basic concepts of the semantics

0

% non-modal vq. −0.9183 0.2139 −4.2923

3

& Kratzer (1998: 66) assume in their discussion of a Functional Application (FA) alternative to their

1

whenever he becomes inspired, he finds it difficult to keep quiet. ibis is perhaps why

2

≡ λz [z INST [SINGLE(Jacinta)] / [R(z, si)]]

0

503

1

is in the fact that the items themselves have been put together from oral tradition,

1

(1993:5);

0

---------------------------- Variables in the Equation ----------------------------

0

1.061.124

0

12.576

1

As we can see here only the first person singular and third person

0

-64

2

È jidhé m là so váyi vàalu  lévì. They arrest me for survival levy

2

accounts for the term, the NGP, or ‘Nominal Group’. After the “Categories” stage

0

825

2

(15) Ich hoffe von [diesem Buch], dass es ein Erfolg wird.

0

�� E

1

abuse, and wrong-headed destruction of African ideals in favour of Western concepts

1

universal phrase each student in (50) cannot receive wide scope due to an island

0

��!� �� &2�+./+� *�� %�� $�� 0�� *�� #�� %��

1

Hunters also praise their dogs, simply to motivate the dogs and spur them into

1

degrees and that this makes K-states produce relatively weaker deviations.

0

� ÜG#�*�*�� ÞÖá ß

2

(16) Traurig, das bin ich schon.

0

11.505

1

confers on the novels their disorderly and scatological texture.

2

(17) PrP

1

assumes that the reader already has fore-knowledge of what he is saying.

0

---- 2014.3.8

2

(1 6 ) G ~ v ~ ~ n e s s

1

From the background of the characterisation of events in (1), Maienborn (2004) adduces a