subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmingcirclejerk | SlaimeLannister | gn57op5 | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 100 |
programmingcirclejerk | irqlnotdispatchlevel | gn5l7xu | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 78 |
programmingcirclejerk | gahagg | gn5myqk | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 63 |
programmingcirclejerk | exploooooosions | gn82t0s | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 41 |
programmingcirclejerk | witcher_rat | gn5enr6 | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 39 |
programmingcirclejerk | MarchDefiant | gna3m4g | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | GOPHERS_GONE_WILD | gn5u121 | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | ToughPhotograph | gn5oth3 | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | exploooooosions | gn834u8 | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | exploooooosions | gn846ku | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | MarchDefiant | gna3dlz | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | 32gbsd | gn57f2c | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | muntaxitome | gn7ftop | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | staybythebay | gn8f593 | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | ztwizzle | gn7eoeh | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | pareidolist | gn8rtfa | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | pareidolist | gn8spcr | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | MarchDefiant | gna34ix | <|sols|><|sot|>*Guy debugs 24 year-old bug in linux*. Another guy: "I mean yes, debugging is an art form. But a whole lot of it is just experience and knowledge. After some time you are just able to do seemingly impressive stuff like counting fluently in hexadecimal"<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments... | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | THICC_DICC_PRICC | edshqz | <|sols|><|sot|>[Emacs users] tend to be more measured, deep dive kind of folks...Emacs users are cathedral builders...Hard core Vim users are more like Mongol warriors, zooming in and then back out in the blink of a thought as they rampage over the vast grasslands of the Mongolian Steppe.<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.co... | 179 |
programmingcirclejerk | Stepmaster3000 | fbkxd2t | <|sols|><|sot|>[Emacs users] tend to be more measured, deep dive kind of folks...Emacs users are cathedral builders...Hard core Vim users are more like Mongol warriors, zooming in and then back out in the blink of a thought as they rampage over the vast grasslands of the Mongolian Steppe.<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.co... | 72 |
programmingcirclejerk | Stepmaster3000 | fblgfrc | <|sols|><|sot|>[Emacs users] tend to be more measured, deep dive kind of folks...Emacs users are cathedral builders...Hard core Vim users are more like Mongol warriors, zooming in and then back out in the blink of a thought as they rampage over the vast grasslands of the Mongolian Steppe.<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.co... | 40 |
programmingcirclejerk | miauw62 | fbld2el | <|sols|><|sot|>[Emacs users] tend to be more measured, deep dive kind of folks...Emacs users are cathedral builders...Hard core Vim users are more like Mongol warriors, zooming in and then back out in the blink of a thought as they rampage over the vast grasslands of the Mongolian Steppe.<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.co... | 33 |
programmingcirclejerk | psaldorn | fbkul0i | <|sols|><|sot|>[Emacs users] tend to be more measured, deep dive kind of folks...Emacs users are cathedral builders...Hard core Vim users are more like Mongol warriors, zooming in and then back out in the blink of a thought as they rampage over the vast grasslands of the Mongolian Steppe.<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.co... | 29 |
programmingcirclejerk | republitard_2 | fbmd9ep | <|sols|><|sot|>[Emacs users] tend to be more measured, deep dive kind of folks...Emacs users are cathedral builders...Hard core Vim users are more like Mongol warriors, zooming in and then back out in the blink of a thought as they rampage over the vast grasslands of the Mongolian Steppe.<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.co... | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | lampshadish2 | fbkh3k0 | <|sols|><|sot|>[Emacs users] tend to be more measured, deep dive kind of folks...Emacs users are cathedral builders...Hard core Vim users are more like Mongol warriors, zooming in and then back out in the blink of a thought as they rampage over the vast grasslands of the Mongolian Steppe.<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.co... | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | mwgkgk | fbm12u4 | <|sols|><|sot|>[Emacs users] tend to be more measured, deep dive kind of folks...Emacs users are cathedral builders...Hard core Vim users are more like Mongol warriors, zooming in and then back out in the blink of a thought as they rampage over the vast grasslands of the Mongolian Steppe.<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.co... | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | mwgkgk | fblypnw | <|sols|><|sot|>[Emacs users] tend to be more measured, deep dive kind of folks...Emacs users are cathedral builders...Hard core Vim users are more like Mongol warriors, zooming in and then back out in the blink of a thought as they rampage over the vast grasslands of the Mongolian Steppe.<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.co... | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | fecking_zhir | fbkrvqb | <|sols|><|sot|>[Emacs users] tend to be more measured, deep dive kind of folks...Emacs users are cathedral builders...Hard core Vim users are more like Mongol warriors, zooming in and then back out in the blink of a thought as they rampage over the vast grasslands of the Mongolian Steppe.<|eot|><|sol|>https://reddit.co... | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | cmov | 6t7wem | <|sols|><|sot|>/r/Programming is a bunch of code monkeys that get paid 35k/year to maintain legacy java and c++ code bases. Stick to [Golang] mailing lists if you want to talk to good programmers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/6t1b9m/welcome_to_rgolang_how_tough_are_ya/dlh5qll/<|eol|><|eols|><|e... | 177 |
programmingcirclejerk | i_pk_pjers_i | dlipy4q | <|sols|><|sot|>/r/Programming is a bunch of code monkeys that get paid 35k/year to maintain legacy java and c++ code bases. Stick to [Golang] mailing lists if you want to talk to good programmers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/6t1b9m/welcome_to_rgolang_how_tough_are_ya/dlh5qll/<|eol|><|sor|>I fe... | 58 |
programmingcirclejerk | Maj3stade | dlinm3q | <|sols|><|sot|>/r/Programming is a bunch of code monkeys that get paid 35k/year to maintain legacy java and c++ code bases. Stick to [Golang] mailing lists if you want to talk to good programmers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/6t1b9m/welcome_to_rgolang_how_tough_are_ya/dlh5qll/<|eol|><|sor|>I li... | 37 |
programmingcirclejerk | cmov | dlivc8n | <|sols|><|sot|>/r/Programming is a bunch of code monkeys that get paid 35k/year to maintain legacy java and c++ code bases. Stick to [Golang] mailing lists if you want to talk to good programmers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/6t1b9m/welcome_to_rgolang_how_tough_are_ya/dlh5qll/<|eol|><|soopr|>ht... | 33 |
programmingcirclejerk | triszroy | dlio62l | <|sols|><|sot|>/r/Programming is a bunch of code monkeys that get paid 35k/year to maintain legacy java and c++ code bases. Stick to [Golang] mailing lists if you want to talk to good programmers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/6t1b9m/welcome_to_rgolang_how_tough_are_ya/dlh5qll/<|eol|><|sor|>Man,... | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | cmov | dlivhbg | <|sols|><|sot|>/r/Programming is a bunch of code monkeys that get paid 35k/year to maintain legacy java and c++ code bases. Stick to [Golang] mailing lists if you want to talk to good programmers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/6t1b9m/welcome_to_rgolang_how_tough_are_ya/dlh5qll/<|eol|><|sor|>I li... | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | yorickpeterse | dlj7oxp | <|sols|><|sot|>/r/Programming is a bunch of code monkeys that get paid 35k/year to maintain legacy java and c++ code bases. Stick to [Golang] mailing lists if you want to talk to good programmers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/6t1b9m/welcome_to_rgolang_how_tough_are_ya/dlh5qll/<|eol|><|sor|>This... | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | Shorttail0 | dlj2t8r | <|sols|><|sot|>/r/Programming is a bunch of code monkeys that get paid 35k/year to maintain legacy java and c++ code bases. Stick to [Golang] mailing lists if you want to talk to good programmers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/6t1b9m/welcome_to_rgolang_how_tough_are_ya/dlh5qll/<|eol|><|sor|>> As... | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | miauw62 | dlkmq9x | <|sols|><|sot|>/r/Programming is a bunch of code monkeys that get paid 35k/year to maintain legacy java and c++ code bases. Stick to [Golang] mailing lists if you want to talk to good programmers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/6t1b9m/welcome_to_rgolang_how_tough_are_ya/dlh5qll/<|eol|><|sor|>Man,... | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | KFCConspiracy | dlj3yrz | <|sols|><|sot|>/r/Programming is a bunch of code monkeys that get paid 35k/year to maintain legacy java and c++ code bases. Stick to [Golang] mailing lists if you want to talk to good programmers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/6t1b9m/welcome_to_rgolang_how_tough_are_ya/dlh5qll/<|eol|><|sor|>/r/p... | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | CruxMostSimple | dlisj6i | <|sols|><|sot|>/r/Programming is a bunch of code monkeys that get paid 35k/year to maintain legacy java and c++ code bases. Stick to [Golang] mailing lists if you want to talk to good programmers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/6t1b9m/welcome_to_rgolang_how_tough_are_ya/dlh5qll/<|eol|><|sor|>comr... | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | Shorttail0 | dlj2utq | <|sols|><|sot|>/r/Programming is a bunch of code monkeys that get paid 35k/year to maintain legacy java and c++ code bases. Stick to [Golang] mailing lists if you want to talk to good programmers.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/6t1b9m/welcome_to_rgolang_how_tough_are_ya/dlh5qll/<|eol|><|sor|>>fan... | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | xmcqdpt2 | 123lww6 | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 176 |
programmingcirclejerk | xmcqdpt2 | jdv4zow | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 206 |
programmingcirclejerk | james_pic | jdv9xkt | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 104 |
programmingcirclejerk | PM_ME_DPRK_CANDIDS | jdvcf4c | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 76 |
programmingcirclejerk | Kodiologist | jdv9sje | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 58 |
programmingcirclejerk | aikii | jdv9ejg | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 45 |
programmingcirclejerk | irqlnotdispatchlevel | jdv487d | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 37 |
programmingcirclejerk | Kodiologist | jdv5s24 | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | xmcqdpt2 | jdv3qif | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | xmcqdpt2 | jdv6vg6 | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | stevedorries | jdv7xf0 | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | jorpjomp | jdvzylj | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | v_maria | jdw97xu | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | Gwolf4 | jdwacyq | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | PM_ME_DPRK_CANDIDS | jdwbqy5 | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | NewFuturist | jdw2xdg | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | Kodiologist | jdvaen7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | VariationDistinct330 | jdvi2ox | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | muntaxitome | jdwlf28 | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | jdx8yn2 | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | the211a | jdwfhey | <|sols|><|sot|>Software development is not carpentry. Almost everything a developer writes is unique, they have never built that particular thing before. We are not cabinet makers repeating a variation of something we've built hundreds of times before.<|eot|><|sol|>https://pm.stackexchange.com/questions/34768/why-are-d... | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | starlevel01 | y0sikr | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 178 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | irtuhi8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj it baffles me that its... | 100 |
programmingcirclejerk | Cock_InhalIng_Wizard | irttcw0 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>"that seems like a serious... | 79 |
programmingcirclejerk | voidvector | irunvw6 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>It is called "planned obso... | 72 |
programmingcirclejerk | NonDairyYandere | irupri7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj Go [not having monoton... | 52 |
programmingcirclejerk | TheGag96 | irtvujy | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj it baffles me that its... | 40 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | iruex3y | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj it baffles me that its... | 32 |
programmingcirclejerk | tomwhoiscontrary | irvkzl2 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj Go [not having monoton... | 29 |
programmingcirclejerk | ComfortablyBalanced | irum9e1 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>"that seems like a serious... | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | tomwhoiscontrary | irvl1tt | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj it baffles me that its... | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | ComfortablyBalanced | irum5f0 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj it baffles me that its... | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | qiwi | irwlhd1 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>The only moral time unit a... | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | MechanicalOrange5 | irvejmm | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>"that seems like a serious... | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | tomwhoiscontrary | irvl6zs | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj it baffles me that its... | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | iloveportalz0r | irv9y01 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>lol unrepresentable durati... | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | VanillaSkyDreamer | irvk3h9 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>It is called "planned obso... | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | Silly-Freak | irvzd8d | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj it baffles me that its... | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | duckbill_principate | irwldeo | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj Go [not having monoton... | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | Busti | irveirb | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj it baffles me that its... | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | SKRAMZ_OR_NOT | irwklc7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj it baffles me that its... | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | tomwhoiscontrary | irwewf0 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go uses a 96-bit value for datetimes (64-bit seconds + 32-bit nanos), but a 64-bit nanoseconds value for durations (which is the 500 year range). The Duration between two representable Times is not always representable.<|eot|><|sol|>https://lwn.net/Articles/908396/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj it baffles me that its... | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | Evinceo | wpwi0x | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 175 |
programmingcirclejerk | lowspeccorgi | ikj254e | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>I agree, lets make the OS a browser which can run webpages only. This means that the only native software are webpages,... | 125 |
programmingcirclejerk | wzdd | ikjcsm0 | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>Native software: rawdoggin it
Phone apps: you use a condom but first your partner has to beg you not to
Web sites: ... | 105 |
programmingcirclejerk | TheGhostOfInky | ikkarkg | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>I agree, lets make the OS a browser which can run webpages only. This means that the only native software are webpages,... | 75 |
programmingcirclejerk | another_day_passes | ikjgede | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>Performance considered harmful<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 71 |
programmingcirclejerk | zetaconvex | ikjisnu | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>"It is like having unprotected sex with someone."
This is nerds he's talking to. They have no idea what having sex is ... | 69 |
programmingcirclejerk | VariationDistinct330 | ikjlv4a | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>"It is like having unprotected sex with someone."
This is nerds he's talking to. They have no idea what having sex is ... | 35 |
programmingcirclejerk | kz393 | ikkk6ft | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>I agree, lets make the OS a browser which can run webpages only. This means that the only native software are webpages,... | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | kz393 | ikkjula | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>replace "native" with "unsigned" and it's absolutely correct. I'd say it's even worse than unprotected sex since the ri... | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | Amphorax | ikkzdvw | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>Native software: rawdoggin it
Phone apps: you use a condom but first your partner has to beg you not to
Web sites: ... | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | northrupthebandgeek | ikmtpjm | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>I agree, lets make the OS a browser which can run webpages only. This means that the only native software are webpages,... | 21 |
programmingcirclejerk | pareidolist | ikm1hit | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>I agree, lets make the OS a browser which can run webpages only. This means that the only native software are webpages,... | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | procsyma | ikktr04 | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>Native software: rawdoggin it
Phone apps: you use a condom but first your partner has to beg you not to
Web sites: ... | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | KingOfKingOfKings | iklaazf | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>Native software: rawdoggin it
Phone apps: you use a condom but first your partner has to beg you not to
Web sites: ... | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | tech6hutch | ikn7ie9 | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>replace "native" with "unsigned" and it's absolutely correct. I'd say it's even worse than unprotected sex since the ri... | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | GreedyGrasshopper | ikjhzqp | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>Where is the jerk?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | binaryblade | ikltw8r | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>I agree, lets make the OS a browser which can run webpages only. This means that the only native software are webpages,... | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | FreezerWave | ikmsjbj | <|sols|><|sot|>The barrier to install native software should be very, very high. It is like having unprotected sex with someone.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32483302<|eol|><|sor|>I agree, lets make the OS a browser which can run webpages only. This means that the only native software are webpages,... | 11 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.