data_name stringclasses 5
values | model_name stringclasses 4
values | dix int64 0 1.02k | stance stringclasses 2
values | batch int64 0 6 | IND_response stringlengths 52 1.52k | RS_or_RN float64 0 0.99 ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 10 | toxic | 0 | **Decision**: The text is toxic.
**Additional Reasons**:
2. **Personal Attack**: The text directly attacks Governor K. Brown by calling for his impeachment, which is a severe and personal attack.
3. **Lack of Constructive Criticism**: The text does not provide any constructive criticism or suggestions for improvement... | 0.032851 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 10 | toxic | 1 | **Decision**: The text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s)**:
1. **Derogatory Language**: The use of the word "stupid" to describe the people who came up with the policy or idea is derogatory and insulting. This language is toxic because it dehumanizes and belittles the individuals involved, fostering a hostile and disr... | 0.033736 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 10 | toxic | 2 | **Decision**: Yes, the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
1. **Personal Attacks**: The text uses derogatory language ("stupid") to attack individuals, which is a form of personal attack and is toxic.
2. **Lack of Respect for Authority**: The text uses the phrase "impeach" to suggest removing a government officia... | 0.034084 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 11 | toxic | 0 | Decision: No, the given reason is sufficient to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
However, I have identified an additional reason:
2. The phrase "Or even what race I am?" implies that the person's race is being questioned or mocked, which can be perceived as a form of racism or xenophobia, and further adds to the toxici... | 0.403399 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 11 | toxic | 1 | No, an additional reason is not required to justify why the TEXT is toxic. The provided reason is sufficient to classify the TEXT as toxic. | 0.802303 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 11 | toxic | 0 | I have identified the TEXT as TOXIC.
Additional reason:
2. The TEXT is also toxic because it is aggressive and confrontational in tone, with the speaker directly attacking the person's intelligence and making a personal attack, which can lead to defensiveness and escalate the situation. | 0.036575 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 11 | toxic | 1 | I have identified the TEXT as toxic.
Additional reasons:
1. The use of a derogatory term ("Moron") to describe someone is a form of insult and can be hurtful and demeaning. It is a personal attack that is intended to belittle and degrade the recipient, rather than engage in a constructive conversation.
2. The TEXT i... | 0.027476 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 11 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** No, an additional reason is not required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
However, I can provide some additional insights:
The TEXT is toxic primarily because of the insult "Moron" as mentioned in the given reason. The tone of the TEXT is also somewhat aggressive and confrontational, which contributes ... | 0.299603 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 11 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** No, an additional reason is not required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
However, I can provide some additional insights:
The TEXT is toxic not only because of its condescending and aggressive tone, but also due to the following reasons:
1. **Use of derogatory language**: The TEXT uses the word "Moro... | 0.314427 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 11 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** The TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
2. **Racist Implication:** The text implies that the person's race can be inferred from their logic, which is a racist stereotype. This assumption is harmful and offensive, as it generalizes and perpetuates harmful stereotypes about different races. | 0.045361 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 11 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** The text is toxic.
**Additional Reasons:**
1. **Insulting Language:** The use of the word "moron" is an insult and is derogatory, adding to the toxic nature of the message.
2. **Personal Attack:** The text attacks the intelligence and character of the person being addressed, which is a form of personal a... | 0.035401 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 12 | toxic | 0 | Additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
2. The tone of the response is dismissive and aggressive, implying that the person's opinions or comments are not worth engaging with, which can be perceived as belittling and disrespectful. | 0.043399 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 12 | toxic | 1 | Decision: No additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
Additional reasons:
1. The language used is derogatory ("idiotic comments") which is an insult and dehumanizing.
2. The phrase "Simple aint it?" is condescending and belittling, implying that the other person is too stupid to understand some... | 0.389216 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 12 | toxic | 2 | Decision: No additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
The given reason already clearly explains why the TEXT is toxic, specifically highlighting the sarcastic and belittling tone used in the phrase "Simple aint it?" This tone contributes to the overall toxic nature of the TEXT. | 0.809416 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 12 | toxic | 0 | I decide that the TEXT is toxic.
Here are some additional reasons that justify why the TEXT is toxic:
1. **Condescending tone**: The use of the word "idiotic" to describe someone's comments is condescending and belittling, which can be perceived as insulting and demeaning.
2. **Lack of constructive feedback**: The te... | 0.018877 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 12 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** The TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Threat of non-response**: The text threatens to not respond to the person who makes the comment, which can be perceived as a form of emotional manipulation or intimidation.
2. **Confrontational tone**: The text has a confrontational tone, which can escalat... | 0.042212 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 12 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Condescending tone**: The phrase "Simple aint it?" comes across as condescending and sarcastic, implying that the person being addressed is not intelligent enough to understand the situation.
2. **Threate... | 0.030861 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 12 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
Here are the additional reasons:
1. **Name-calling**: The TEXT contains the word "idiotic", which is a form of name-calling and can be perceived as insulting or demeaning.
2. **Threatening tone**: The phrase "and I won't respond" can... | 0.028211 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 12 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** Yes, the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
2. **Condescending Tone:** The phrase "Simple aint it?" is condescending and dismissive, implying that the person's comments are so simple and stupid that they don't warrant a response. This is disrespectful and belittling. | 0.036695 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 12 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, the text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
1. **Demeaning Language:** The use of the term "idiotic" is demeaning and insulting, which is inherently toxic.
2. **Lack of Empathy:** The speaker shows no empathy or understanding for the other person's perspective, which is a key aspect of toxic commun... | 0.029076 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 12 | toxic | 2 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reasons:**
1. **Demeaning Language:** The use of the word "idiotic" is derogatory and insulting, which is inherently toxic.
2. **Threatening Tone:** The statement "I won't respond" can be seen as a threat or a form of bl... | 0.032288 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 13 | toxic | 0 | Decision: No additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
Additional reasons:
1. The phrase "Everyone has to do their part" can be seen as a veiled attempt to shift the blame onto others, rather than taking responsibility for one's own actions or offering solutions. This can be perceived as dismiss... | 0.450229 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 13 | toxic | 1 | Decision: No, an additional reason is not required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
The given reason already highlights the insensitivity and condescending tone of the message, making it toxic. The phrase "loser" further emphasizes the toxic nature of the statement. | 0.800866 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 13 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** Yes, the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reason:**
2. **Threat or implication of shame**: The text implies that someone is not doing their part, which can lead to feelings of guilt, shame, or inadequacy. This can be damaging to the recipient's self-esteem and create a negative emotional response, making the... | 0.062745 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 13 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** No, an additional reason is not required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
However, I can provide some additional insights:
The given reason already adequately explains why the TEXT is toxic. The use of the term "loser" as a pejorative insult is a clear indicator of toxic language. Nevertheless, here ar... | 0.359401 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 13 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Name-calling**: The use of the term "loser" is a form of name-calling, which is a toxic behavior that can be hurtful and demeaning. It's a personal attack that doesn't contribute to a constructive convers... | 0.036495 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 13 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** The text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
2. **Passive-Aggressive Tone:** The phrase "thanks loser" is not only insulting but also passive-aggressive. It expresses resentment or dissatisfaction without directly addressing the issue, which can be harmful and divisive. | 0.034764 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 13 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, the text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
1. **Insult:** The text uses the term "loser" to insult the reader, which is a derogatory and disrespectful way to address someone.
2. **Lack of Empathy:** The text does not consider the reader's situation or feelings, and it does not acknowledge that eve... | 0.037389 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 13 | toxic | 2 | **Decision:** Yes, the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
1. **Disrespectful Language:** The use of the word "loser" is derogatory and disrespectful. It belittles the reader and is not appropriate for a professional or respectful conversation.
2. **Lack of Constructive Communication:** The text does not provide... | 0.035378 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 14 | toxic | 0 | Decision: Additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
Additional reasons:
1. The text contains a condescending statement ("you are too ignorant to realize it"), which implies that the person being addressed is unintelligent or lacking in knowledge. This is a form of intellectual elitism and beli... | 0.033897 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 14 | toxic | 1 | Decision: No additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
Additional reasons:
1. The text contains a personal attack ("Your post is really stupid"), which is a direct insult that targets the recipient's work or opinion, rather than addressing the content or ideas presented.
2. The language used is ... | 0.359455 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 14 | toxic | 0 | I believe that the TEXT is toxic.
Here is an additional reason:
2. **Confrontational tone**: The text uses a confrontational tone, with the phrase "you are too ignorant to realize it", which can come across as aggressive and dismissive, rather than encouraging or constructive. This tone can lead to defensiveness and ... | 0.016548 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 14 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Personal attack**: The comment directly attacks the person's intelligence and character, which can be hurtful and damaging to their self-esteem.
2. **Aggressive language**: The use of the word "stupid" is a strong and pejorative term that can be perce... | 0.038965 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 14 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** No, an additional reason is not required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
However, I can provide some additional insights:
The TEXT is toxic not only because of the direct insult, but also because it:
1. **Implies a personal attack**: The phrase "you are too ignorant to realize it" is a personal attac... | 0.304465 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 14 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** No, an additional reason is not required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
However, I can provide some supplementary insights:
The given reason already highlights the personal attack in the TEXT, which is a clear indicator of toxicity. The TEXT also contains an ad hominem attack ("Your post is really st... | 0.320286 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 14 | toxic | 2 | **Decision:** No, an additional reason is not required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
However, I can provide some additional insights:
The TEXT is already deemed toxic due to the given reason, which effectively explains why it is harmful. The use of derogatory terms like "stupid" and "ignorant" is a clear indicati... | 0.262499 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 14 | toxic | 0 | **Decision**: Yes, the text is toxic.
**Additional Reasons**:
1. **Lack of Constructive Feedback**: The text does not provide any constructive feedback or suggestion for improvement. Instead, it only criticizes without offering any helpful insights.
2. **Disrespectful Tone**: The use of the phrase "too ignorant to rea... | 0.030402 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 14 | toxic | 1 | **Decision**: Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reasons:**
1. **Personal Attack**: The text directly attacks the recipient's intelligence, which is a form of personal attack and is not constructive or respectful.
2. **Dismissal of Ideas**: The text dismisses the recip... | 0.036884 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 14 | toxic | 2 | **Decision**: The text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s)**:
1. **Insulting Tone**: The use of "really stupid" and "too ignorant" is insulting and dismissive, which can be hurtful and disrespectful to the person being addressed.
2. **Lack of Constructive Feedback**: Instead of providing any constructive feedback or sugg... | 0.03457 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 14 | toxic | 3 | **Decision**: Yes, the text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
2. **Personal Attack**: The text uses derogatory language ("stupid") to personally attack the person who made the post, which is disrespectful and harmful.
3. **Lack of Empathy**: The text shows a lack of empathy towards the person who made the post, as i... | 0.031941 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 15 | toxic | 0 | Decision: No additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
Additional reasons:
1. The word "slaughter" is often associated with violence, death, or mass killing, which can evoke strong negative emotions in the reader.
2. The phrase "manage the slaughter" can be seen as a euphemism, downplaying the s... | 0.376038 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 15 | toxic | 1 | Based on the provided information, I decide that an additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
Additional reasons:
1. The use of the word "slaughter" is a metaphorical expression that can be associated with violence, brutality, or destruction, which may evoke a negative emotional response.
2. The... | 0.036687 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 15 | toxic | 0 | I classify the TEXT as TOXIC.
Additional reasons:
1. The word "slaughter" is a graphic and violent term that can be off-putting or unsettling to many people, which may lead to a negative emotional response.
2. The context of the sentence implies that Carson is being appointed to manage something that involves violenc... | 0.03638 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 15 | toxic | 1 | I believe the TEXT is toxic.
Here are some additional reasons why:
1. The use of the word "slaughter" is a strong and graphic term that can evoke a sense of violence and horror, which can be disturbing or unsettling to read.
2. The tone of the statement is abrupt and matter-of-fact, which can come across as insensiti... | 0.027382 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 15 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons may be required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Dehumanization**: The use of the word "slaughter" in the context of managing something or someone implies a lack of regard for human life or well-being, which can be dehumanizing and toxic.
2. **Tone a... | 0.033015 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 15 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons may be required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Glorification of violence**: The text appears to be discussing a violent act ("slaughter") in a casual or matter-of-fact way, which can contribute to a desensitization of violence and promote a toxic a... | 0.031966 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 15 | toxic | 2 | I have decided that additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
Here are the additional reasons I have identified:
1. **Violent language**: The use of the word "slaughter" implies a violent and harmful act, which can be disturbing and offensive to some readers.
2. **Potential political or social... | 0.033491 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 15 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** The text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
2. **Derogatory Language:** The phrase "manage the slaughter" suggests that the person being referred to is incompetent or malicious, implying that they are not capable of handling the situation responsibly. This is derogatory and toxic. | 0.046366 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 15 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, the text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
2. **Derogatory Language:** The phrase "manage the slaughter" is derogatory and implies that the person being appointed is involved in or responsible for causing harm or violence, which is a toxic and disrespectful way to refer to someone's role. | 0.039326 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 16 | toxic | 0 | Additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
1. The TEXT uses a mocking tone, specifically the "ba ba boo" phrase, which is often used to mock or belittle someone, adding to the overall tone of aggression and ridicule. | 0.05465 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 16 | toxic | 1 | Decision: No additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
The given reason is sufficient to explain why the TEXT is toxic, as it highlights the mocking and belittling tone used, which can be hurtful and disrespectful. | 0.814673 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 16 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** The TEXT is toxic because it contains a personal attack.
**Additional reason:**
1. **Harassment**: The repetition of the term "leaker" in a mocking and rhythmic manner ("Comey is a leaker, a leaker, a leaker! / Comey is a leaker, ba ba boo!") can be seen as harassment, as it is a form of verbal bullying... | 0.042424 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 16 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Personal attack**: The use of a derogatory term ("leaker") to describe a person (Comey) is a personal attack, which can be perceived as hurtful and inflammatory.
2. **Emotional manipulation**: The childish rhyme ("ba ba boo") can be seen as an attempt... | 0.045218 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 16 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Childish tone**: The use of a nursery rhyme-like structure and the "ba ba boo" phrase gives the TEXT a childish and mocking tone, which can be seen as condescending and disrespectful towards the person be... | 0.028453 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 16 | toxic | 1 | I have decided that additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
Here are the additional reasons:
1. **Name-calling and labeling**: The text uses the term "leaker" in a repetitive and derogatory manner, which can be seen as a form of name-calling and labeling. This type of language can be hurtful... | 0.038098 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 16 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** The text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
2. **Personal Attack:** The text does not only mock the person but also personally attacks them by labeling them as a "leaker," which is a derogatory term implying dishonesty and untrustworthiness.
3. **Inflammatory Language:** The use of phrases like "Comey ... | 0.038053 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 16 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, the text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
1. **Repetition:** The repetition of "Comey is a leaker" is not only redundant but also serves to amplify the negative sentiment, making it more toxic.
2. **Personal Attack:** The text is a personal attack on James Comey, using derogatory language to bel... | 0.04224 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 17 | toxic | 0 | Decision: No additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
The given reason is sufficient to classify the text as toxic. The use of derogatory language ("goober") is a clear indicator of a negative and belittling tone, which is a key characteristic of toxic language. | 0.803635 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 17 | toxic | 1 | Decision: Yes, an additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
Additional reason:
2. The text also uses a derogatory tone and a condescending language, which can be perceived as belittling and mocking. The use of "goober" is a colloquialism that is often used to mock or belittle someone, and the phr... | 0.045012 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 17 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** The text is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Stereotyping and racism**: The use of the term "Russian" to refer to someone as a moron implies a stereotype about people from Russia being unintelligent, which is a form of racism and xenophobia.
2. **Name-calling**: The text uses a name-calling tone, whe... | 0.039625 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 17 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, the text is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Derogatory language**: The use of the word "goober" is a colloquialism that can be considered derogatory and demeaning, and the addition of "thinks he's witty" further emphasizes the mocking tone.
2. **Name-calling**: The text name-calls the person be... | 0.034792 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 17 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Name-calling and labeling**: The TEXT uses a derogatory term ("goober") to address someone, which is a form of name-calling and labeling. This can be hurtful and demeaning, and is often used to belittle o... | 0.030039 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 17 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. The use of the word "goober" is derogatory and insulting, implying that the person being addressed is foolish or stupid.
2. The statement "It's Russian for moron" is also toxic because it uses a stereotype ... | 0.033113 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 17 | toxic | 2 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Name-calling and personal attack**: The text starts with "Oh, look some goober thinks he's witty", which is a derogatory term used to mock or belittle someone, setting a confrontational tone.
2. **Cultura... | 0.032249 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 17 | toxic | 0 | **Decision**: The text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
1. **Insulting Tone**: The text is written in a mocking and insulting tone, which is inherently toxic.
2. **Name-Calling**: The use of "some goober" is a form of name-calling, which is a form of personal attack and is toxic. | 0.029957 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 17 | toxic | 1 | **Decision**: The text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s)**:
1. **Derogatory Language**: The use of the term "goober" is derogatory and intended to belittle the person being addressed.
2. **Mockery**: The phrase "It's Russian for moron" is mocking the person's intelligence, implying that they are stupid or unintelligent... | 0.028718 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 17 | toxic | 2 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reasons:**
1. **Derogatory Language**: The use of the term "goober" is derogatory and insulting, intended to belittle and degrade the person being addressed.
2. **Stereotyping**: The statement "It's Russian for moron" pe... | 0.035332 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 18 | toxic | 0 | Decision: No additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
However, I have identified an additional reason:
1. **Personal attack**: The text not only insults the person's intelligence but also makes a personal attack by labeling them as an "idiot," which is a pejorative term that can be perceived as... | 0.452247 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 18 | toxic | 1 | I do not believe an additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic. The provided reason already sufficiently explains why the TEXT is toxic. However, I can provide some additional reasons that further support the toxicity of the TEXT:
1. **Name-calling**: Calling someone an "idiot" is a form of name-ca... | 0.306869 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 18 | toxic | 2 | Decision: No, an additional reason is not required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
The given reason, **Aggressive tone**, is sufficient to explain why the TEXT is toxic. The tone of the message is confrontational and dismissive, which can be hurtful and alienating to the recipient. | 0.804505 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 18 | toxic | 0 | I believe that the TEXT is toxic.
Additional reasons:
1. **Personal attack**: The text makes a personal attack on the person, using the word "idiot", which is a highly derogatory term that is likely to cause offense and hurt the person's feelings.
2. **Bias-based insult**: The text implies that the person has a "left... | 0.024004 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 18 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Name-calling**: The text uses a derogatory term "idiot" to insult the person, which is a form of name-calling and can be hurtful and damaging to the person's self-esteem and reputation.
2. **Aggressive tone**: The text has an aggressive tone, with the... | 0.033838 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 18 | toxic | 2 | **Decision:** Yes, the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reason:**
2. **Personal attack**: The text is a personal attack, specifically targeting the recipient's intelligence and political views. This type of attack can be hurtful and damaging to the recipient, and is not a constructive way to engage in a discussion or deba... | 0.052002 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 18 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** No, an additional reason is not required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
However, I can provide some additional insights:
The TEXT is toxic not only because of the personal attacks and insults, but also due to the following reasons:
1. **Labeling and stereotyping**: The TEXT labels the person as havi... | 0.345391 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 18 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** No, an additional reason is not required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
However, I can provide some additional reasons that support the toxicity of the TEXT:
1. **Personal attack**: The TEXT includes a direct personal attack ("must be an idiot") which is a form of ad hominem argumentation that aims t... | 0.423416 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 18 | toxic | 2 | **Decision:** No, an additional reason is not required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
However, I can provide some additional insights that support the existing reason:
The TEXT is toxic because, in addition to the reason provided, it also:
1. **Uses personal attacks**: The TEXT resorts to name-calling ("idiot") a... | 0.314292 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 18 | toxic | 0 | **Decision**: Yes, the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s)**:
2. **Name-Calling**: The text uses the term "idiot" to insult the person, which is a derogatory and disrespectful term.
3. **Political Bias**: The text assumes that the person's political views are inherently wrong due to their political affiliation ("lef... | 0.037439 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 18 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** The text is toxic.
**Additional Reasons:**
2. **Derogatory Language**: The text uses "stupidity" and "left wing bias" to insult the person's intelligence and political beliefs, which is derogatory and disrespectful.
3. **Lack of Constructive Criticism**: The text does not provide any constructive feedba... | 0.033726 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 18 | toxic | 2 | **Decision**: The text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s)**:
2. **Personal Attack**: The text uses derogatory language ("stupidity") to attack the person's intelligence, which is a form of personal attack and is disrespectful.
3. **Name-Calling**: The text uses the term "idiot" to insult the person, which is a form of n... | 0.030909 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 18 | toxic | 3 | **Decision:** Yes, the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
1. **Personal Attack**: The text uses derogatory language ("stupidity") and insults ("idiot") to personally attack the person, which is inherently toxic.
2. **Political Bias**: The text assumes the person's political views are inherently negative ("left w... | 0.02888 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 19 | toxic | 0 | Additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
2. The TEXT also implies that people who think feeding coins to a turtle is good are wrong, and possibly uninformed. This can be perceived as condescending and dismissive, which can be hurtful and alienate people who may have a different perspective or ex... | 0.045718 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 19 | toxic | 1 | I do not think any additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic. The provided reason already clearly explains why the statement is toxic. | 0.775701 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 19 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** No, the text is not toxic in the classical sense, as it does not contain hate speech, personal attacks, or explicit profanity. The text is more of a neutral or even cautionary statement, aiming to warn others about the potential harm of feeding coins to turtles.
**Additional reason:**
2. **Negative and... | 0.021899 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 19 | toxic | 1 | I agree with your decision that the TEXT is toxic.
Here are some additional reasons to justify why the TEXT is toxic:
1. **Condescending tone**: The phrase "how stupid can people be" is a condescending remark that implies the writer is talking down to others, which can be perceived as belittling and demeaning.
2. **L... | 0.025516 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 19 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Lack of empathy**: The tone of the TEXT comes across as dismissive and condescending, showing no understanding or empathy for people who may not be aware of the harm caused by feeding coins to turtles.
2.... | 0.027109 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 19 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Lack of empathy**: The TEXT does not acknowledge that people who feed coins to turtles may be doing so out of ignorance or a desire to interact with the animal, rather than malice. A more empathetic appro... | 0.026423 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 19 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** Yes, the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
2. **Misleading Information:** The statement "feeding coins to a turtle is good" is not only misleading but also potentially harmful. Feeding coins to turtles can cause serious health issues, including choking and digestive problems. This misinformation ... | 0.033505 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 19 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reasons:**
1. **Demeaning Language:** The use of the word "stupid" is derogatory and demeaning, as it attacks the intelligence of others without providing constructive feedback or understanding.
2. **Lack of Empathy:** Th... | 0.030703 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 19 | toxic | 2 | **Decision:** Yes, the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
1. **Disrespectful Tone:** The text uses a dismissive and disrespectful tone ("how stupid can people be"), which is inherently toxic and can be hurtful to those who might have made this decision.
2. **Lack of Education:** The text assumes that all people... | 0.029511 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 20 | toxic | 0 | Decision: Yes, an additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
Additional reason:
2. The use of the phrase "all time high" is a colloquialism that implies the person's stupidity is at its peak or worst, which is an exaggeration and a form of hyperbole that can be perceived as belittling and demeani... | 0.043781 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 20 | toxic | 1 | Decision: No, an additional reason is not required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
However, I have identified an additional reason:
1. The use of the word "stupidity" is a derogatory term that directly insults the person's intelligence, which can be hurtful and damaging to their self-esteem. | 0.361268 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 20 | toxic | 2 | Decision: No additional reason is required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
Additional reasons:
1. The language used is derogatory, with the word "stupidity" being a pejorative term that insults the recipient's intelligence.
2. The use of superlatives ("all time high") is an exaggeration that is likely intended to b... | 0.331365 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 20 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** The text is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Personal attack**: The text directly attacks the recipient's character, specifically calling them "stupid", which is a personal and hurtful insult.
2. **Aggressive tone**: The use of the word "an all time high" implies a sense of exaggeration and accusatio... | 0.030443 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct | 20 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, the text is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Insulting language**: The use of the word "stupidity" as a pejorative term is a strong insult that can be hurtful and demeaning.
2. **Aggressive tone**: The phrase "an all time high" implies a sense of exaggeration and hyperbole, which can come across... | 0.033138 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 20 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Condescending tone**: The phrase "there is ample reason to think" comes across as condescending and patronizing, implying that the speaker has a superior understanding or perspective that the person being... | 0.032611 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 20 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Direct personal attack**: The TEXT directly attacks the person's intelligence by calling them "stupid", which is a hurtful and demeaning term that can cause emotional distress.
2. **Lack of constructive f... | 0.03076 |
civil_comments | meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | 20 | toxic | 2 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional reasons:**
1. **Personal attack**: The text directly attacks the person, targeting their intelligence by calling them "stupid", which is a hurtful and demeaning insult.
2. **Lack of constructive feedback**: The text does... | 0.030887 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 20 | toxic | 0 | **Decision:** Yes, the text is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
1. **Lack of Respect:** The text lacks respect for the recipient's intelligence and personal dignity by using harsh and disrespectful language.
2. **Intimidation:** The phrase "all time high" suggests that the recipient's intelligence is so low that it is... | 0.045163 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 20 | toxic | 1 | **Decision:** The TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reason(s):**
1. **Personal Attack:** The text directly attacks the recipient's intelligence by referring to them as "stupid" and implying that their intelligence is at its lowest point. This is a personal attack that can cause emotional distress.
2. **Lack of Respect:** T... | 0.035195 |
civil_comments | mistralai/Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410 | 20 | toxic | 2 | **Decision:** Yes, additional reasons are required to justify why the TEXT is toxic.
**Additional Reasons:**
1. **Personal Attack:** The text directly attacks the recipient's intelligence, which is a personal attack and can be hurtful and disrespectful.
2. **Derogatory Language:** The use of the word "stupidity" is de... | 0.0377 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.