Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
Name
stringlengths
2
15
Year
int64
1.91k
2.02k
Total_sum
int64
5
96.4k
Female_count
int64
0
96.2k
Male_count
int64
0
88.6k
Female_percentage
float64
0
100
Male_percentage
float64
0
100
Gender
stringclasses
3 values
Omega
1,914
22
22
0
100
0
Female
Ellnora
1,914
5
5
0
100
0
Female
Thalma
1,914
5
5
0
100
0
Female
Eloisa
1,914
41
41
0
100
0
Female
Corrie
1,914
41
41
0
100
0
Female
Elenore
1,914
38
38
0
100
0
Female
Luise
1,914
9
9
0
100
0
Female
Aileene
1,914
7
7
0
100
0
Female
Arbelia
1,914
5
5
0
100
0
Female
Emelda
1,914
15
15
0
100
0
Female
Lorna
1,914
135
135
0
100
0
Female
Maragret
1,914
9
9
0
100
0
Female
Louvinia
1,914
9
9
0
100
0
Female
Leoler
1,914
6
6
0
100
0
Female
Lavona
1,914
18
18
0
100
0
Female
Leone
1,914
177
171
6
96.610169
3.389831
Female
Ena
1,914
37
37
0
100
0
Female
Olive
1,914
1,209
1,200
9
99.255583
0.744417
Female
Princess
1,914
14
14
0
100
0
Female
Valeta
1,914
6
6
0
100
0
Female
Martie
1,914
6
6
0
100
0
Female
Ardella
1,914
50
50
0
100
0
Female
Rosemary
1,914
563
563
0
100
0
Female
Vietta
1,914
9
9
0
100
0
Female
Giuseppina
1,914
10
10
0
100
0
Female
Coye
1,914
5
5
0
100
0
Female
Waneta
1,914
40
40
0
100
0
Female
Catherine
1,914
6,633
6,613
20
99.698477
0.301523
Female
Helyne
1,914
6
6
0
100
0
Female
Lorana
1,914
7
7
0
100
0
Female
Debra
1,914
5
5
0
100
0
Female
Berta
1,914
75
75
0
100
0
Female
Irene
1,914
6,211
6,197
14
99.774593
0.225407
Female
Permelia
1,914
8
8
0
100
0
Female
Jullia
1,914
6
6
0
100
0
Female
Novis
1,914
6
6
0
100
0
Female
Alberta
1,914
1,362
1,350
12
99.118943
0.881057
Female
Lilie
1,914
16
16
0
100
0
Female
Winnifred
1,914
94
94
0
100
0
Female
Lavera
1,914
41
41
0
100
0
Female
Eulah
1,914
39
39
0
100
0
Female
Charlee
1,914
5
5
0
100
0
Female
Aline
1,914
277
277
0
100
0
Female
Annabelle
1,914
315
315
0
100
0
Female
Erlene
1,914
31
31
0
100
0
Female
Kathlyn
1,914
101
101
0
100
0
Female
Flora
1,914
1,152
1,152
0
100
0
Female
Lema
1,914
10
10
0
100
0
Female
Mona
1,914
212
212
0
100
0
Female
Ellanor
1,914
7
7
0
100
0
Female
Clessie
1,914
6
6
0
100
0
Female
Alverta
1,914
66
66
0
100
0
Female
Elberta
1,914
43
43
0
100
0
Female
Nena
1,914
19
19
0
100
0
Female
Verlie
1,914
51
51
0
100
0
Female
Cressie
1,914
5
5
0
100
0
Female
Lita
1,914
11
11
0
100
0
Female
Lois
1,914
3,490
3,432
58
98.338109
1.661891
Female
Cozy
1,914
5
5
0
100
0
Female
Rhea
1,914
123
123
0
100
0
Female
Lanell
1,914
6
6
0
100
0
Female
Walsie
1,914
8
8
0
100
0
Female
Lyda
1,914
102
102
0
100
0
Female
Maudell
1,914
10
10
0
100
0
Female
Aleitha
1,914
6
6
0
100
0
Female
Mazella
1,914
6
6
0
100
0
Female
Misao
1,914
7
7
0
100
0
Female
Barbra
1,914
9
9
0
100
0
Female
Elga
1,914
8
8
0
100
0
Female
Jocie
1,914
10
10
0
100
0
Female
Cecille
1,914
11
11
0
100
0
Female
Maryellen
1,914
26
26
0
100
0
Female
Verneice
1,914
5
5
0
100
0
Female
Effie
1,914
726
726
0
100
0
Female
Roena
1,914
19
19
0
100
0
Female
Eular
1,914
5
5
0
100
0
Female
Miranda
1,914
8
8
0
100
0
Female
Lou
1,914
265
227
38
85.660377
14.339623
Female
Arta
1,914
8
8
0
100
0
Female
Mell
1,914
6
6
0
100
0
Female
Levina
1,914
10
10
0
100
0
Female
Christeen
1,914
31
31
0
100
0
Female
Belvia
1,914
10
10
0
100
0
Female
Malissia
1,914
14
14
0
100
0
Female
Ople
1,914
9
9
0
100
0
Female
Luevenia
1,914
14
14
0
100
0
Female
Ebba
1,914
20
20
0
100
0
Female
Alene
1,914
130
130
0
100
0
Female
Lacie
1,914
8
8
0
100
0
Female
Alina
1,914
5
5
0
100
0
Female
Rena
1,914
387
387
0
100
0
Female
Georgana
1,914
6
6
0
100
0
Female
Jetta
1,914
9
9
0
100
0
Female
Luba
1,914
10
10
0
100
0
Female
Zelphia
1,914
9
9
0
100
0
Female
Macil
1,914
8
8
0
100
0
Female
Clarabell
1,914
10
10
0
100
0
Female
Eathel
1,914
16
16
0
100
0
Female
Avinell
1,914
5
5
0
100
0
Female
Katheryne
1,914
17
17
0
100
0
Female
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

This is the official dataset for Beyond Binary Gender Labels: Revealing Gender Bias in LLMs through Gender-Neutral Name Predictions

Name-based gender prediction has traditionally categorized individuals as either female or male based on their names, using a binary classification system. That binary approach can be problematic in the cases of gender-neutral names that do not align with any one gender, among other reasons. Relying solely on binary gender categories without recognizing gender-neutral names can reduce the inclusiveness of gender prediction tasks. We introduce an additional gender category, i.e., "neutral", to study and address potential gender biases in Large Language Models (LLMs).

In this US SSA dataset, we randomly selected 300 names per gender for each year from 1914 to 2022 from the US SSA public dataset.

For Dynamic Gender Labe Dataset, please visit this page.

Dataset Statistics

We split the dataset into train/val/test sets. We keep all three genders (male/female/neutral) balanced across all three sets. Please see below and the paper for more details of our curated datasets: image/png

Citation

Please cite the below paper if you intent to use our data for your research:

@inproceedings{you-etal-2024-beyond,
    title = "Beyond Binary Gender Labels: Revealing Gender Bias in {LLM}s through Gender-Neutral Name Predictions",
    author = "You, Zhiwen  and
      Lee, HaeJin  and
      Mishra, Shubhanshu  and
      Jeoung, Sullam  and
      Mishra, Apratim  and
      Kim, Jinseok  and
      Diesner, Jana",
    editor = "Fale{\'n}ska, Agnieszka  and
      Basta, Christine  and
      Costa-juss{\`a}, Marta  and
      Goldfarb-Tarrant, Seraphina  and
      Nozza, Debora",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP)",
    month = aug,
    year = "2024",
    address = "Bangkok, Thailand",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.gebnlp-1.16",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.gebnlp-1.16",
    pages = "255--268",
}

Contact Information

If you have any questions, please email zhiweny2@illinois.edu.

Downloads last month
21