Dataset Viewer
Duplicate
The dataset viewer is not available for this split.
Cannot extract the features (columns) for the split 'train' of the config 'default' of the dataset.
Error code:   FeaturesError
Exception:    ArrowInvalid
Message:      Schema at index 1 was different: 
timestamp: timestamp[s]
pipeline: string
runId: string
event: string
source: string
rowsRead: int64
totalRowsExtracted: int64
status: string
vs
timestamp: timestamp[s]
job: string
runId: string
cluster: string
event: string
vault: string
secret: string
status: string
servicePrincipal: string
tokenEndpoint: string
errorCode: string
message: string
secretLastRotated: timestamp[s]
secretExpiry: timestamp[s]
error: string
durationMs: int64
Traceback:    Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/split/first_rows.py", line 247, in compute_first_rows_from_streaming_response
                  iterable_dataset = iterable_dataset._resolve_features()
                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 4376, in _resolve_features
                  features = _infer_features_from_batch(self.with_format(None)._head())
                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 2658, in _head
                  return next(iter(self.iter(batch_size=n)))
                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 2836, in iter
                  for key, pa_table in ex_iterable.iter_arrow():
                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 2374, in _iter_arrow
                  yield from self.ex_iterable._iter_arrow()
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/iterable_dataset.py", line 580, in _iter_arrow
                  yield new_key, pa.Table.from_batches(chunks_buffer)
                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                File "pyarrow/table.pxi", line 5039, in pyarrow.lib.Table.from_batches
                File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 155, in pyarrow.lib.pyarrow_internal_check_status
                File "pyarrow/error.pxi", line 92, in pyarrow.lib.check_status
              pyarrow.lib.ArrowInvalid: Schema at index 1 was different: 
              timestamp: timestamp[s]
              pipeline: string
              runId: string
              event: string
              source: string
              rowsRead: int64
              totalRowsExtracted: int64
              status: string
              vs
              timestamp: timestamp[s]
              job: string
              runId: string
              cluster: string
              event: string
              vault: string
              secret: string
              status: string
              servicePrincipal: string
              tokenEndpoint: string
              errorCode: string
              message: string
              secretLastRotated: timestamp[s]
              secretExpiry: timestamp[s]
              error: string
              durationMs: int64

Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.

Toph Eval · Pipeline Failure Diagnosis Benchmark

Version: 0.1
Maintainer: Virgo Machine Labs
License: Apache 2.0
Taxonomy: github.com/vaishsagar-cfo/toph-eval


Overview

Toph Eval is a structured evaluation benchmark for automated root cause analysis (RCA) of data pipeline failures in enterprise health technology environments.

Standard LLM benchmarks address single-step tasks (question answering, multiple choice, text completion). Pipeline RCA is a multi-step reasoning task: a system must read logs across multiple heterogeneous tools simultaneously, construct a causal graph of pipeline execution, and distinguish the origin of a failure from the component at which the error surfaces. No existing general-purpose benchmark addresses this task category.

This dataset provides evaluation scenarios for systems performing automated pipeline RCA. Each scenario includes realistic simulated logs from a 4-tool enterprise ETL pipeline and a structured ground truth answer key scored across four evaluation dimensions.


Pipeline Architecture

All scenarios are built on the Optum pharmacy claims nightly extract pipeline:

Phase Tool Description
Orchestrate Jenkins Triggers pipeline, monitors stage execution
Extract Azure Data Factory Pulls from source systems, lands raw files in ADLS Gen2
Transform Databricks Normalizes clinical codes, applies business rules
Load Azure Synapse Analytics Writes clean records to data warehouse

Log formats reflect real production tool output: Jenkins produces plain text logs; ADF, Databricks, and Synapse produce structured JSON (as exported to Azure Monitor).


Dataset Structure

data/
  {FAILURE_CODE}_{pipeline}_{scenario_number}/
    success_run/
      jenkins.log       # Plain text orchestration log (baseline)
      adf.json          # Azure Data Factory structured log
      databricks.json   # Databricks job event log
      synapse.json      # Azure Synapse Analytics pipeline log
    failure_run/
      jenkins.log
      adf.json
      databricks.json
      synapse.json
    ground_truth.json   # Answer key in toph-eval scoring format

Each scenario includes a success run (normal operation baseline) and a failure run (the scenario under evaluation). The success run enables duration-based anomaly detection and establishes expected row counts.


Scenarios (v0.1)

Scenario ID Failure Code Category Description
DEPEND_002_optum_pharmacy_001 DEPEND_002 Upstream Dependency Silent zero-row extract — all statuses Succeeded
PERM_001_optum_pharmacy_001 PERM_001 Access & Permissions INSERT permission denied on Synapse target table
AUTH_003_optum_pharmacy_001 AUTH_003 Authentication Expired client secret in Key Vault — Databricks auth failure
SCHEMA_002_optum_pharmacy_001 SCHEMA_002 Schema & Data Contract Column removed from upstream source schema
VOLUME_001_optum_pharmacy_001 VOLUME_001 Data Volume & Quality Zero rows from direct extract, HTTP 200, no error raised
CONN_006_optum_pharmacy_001 CONN_006 Connectivity EHR vendor API rate limit hit mid-extract
RESOURCE_001_optum_pharmacy_001 RESOURCE_001 Resource Exhaustion Spark executor OOM on month-end batch volume
ORCH_001_optum_pharmacy_001 ORCH_001 Orchestration DST timezone shift triggers duplicate pipeline run
FILE_003_optum_pharmacy_001 FILE_003 File & Format Upstream payer changed EDI file naming convention
HEALTH_001_optum_pharmacy_001 HEALTH_001 Healthcare-Specific ICD-10 FY2025 codes reference table not updated before October 1

Evaluation Dimensions

Each scenario's ground_truth.json scores across four dimensions, assessed independently:

Dimension Definition Weight
System identification Correctly identifies the infrastructure component where failure manifested Standard
Error classification Correctly assigns the failure type code from the toph-eval taxonomy Standard
Causal chain accuracy Correctly traces failure to its origin, not just where error surfaced Highest
Fix correctness Recommended remediation correctly addresses the identified root cause Standard

Causal chain accuracy is weighted highest. It is the dimension that distinguishes root cause analysis from surface-level error detection, and the dimension on which general-purpose language models without domain-specific tooling perform worst.


Ground Truth Format

{
  "scenario_id": "DEPEND_002_optum_pharmacy_001",
  "taxonomy_version": "0.1",
  "failure_code": "DEPEND_002",
  "failure_category": "Upstream Dependency Failure",
  "description": "Upstream job completed with success status but wrote zero rows",
  "evaluation_dimensions": {
    "system_identification": { "correct_answer": "..." },
    "error_classification": { "correct_answer": "DEPEND_002" },
    "causal_chain_accuracy": {
      "correct_answer": ["step 1", "step 2", "..."],
      "failure_originates_at": "...",
      "error_surfaces_at": "..."
    },
    "fix_correctness": {
      "correct_answer": "...",
      "preventive_fix": "..."
    }
  },
  "diagnostic_signals": [...],
  "common_misdiagnoses": [...]
}

Why Healthcare-Specific Scenarios Matter

The HEALTH_001 scenario (ICD-10 code set update) represents a failure mode with no analog in general-purpose pipeline monitoring literature. Healthcare pipelines operate under annual CMS code set update cycles (ICD-10 effective October 1, CPT effective January 1, NDC updated quarterly). A pipeline that ran correctly on September 30 will fail on October 1 if reference tables are not updated before the effective date. General-purpose LLMs without domain-specific tooling consistently misclassify this as a schema failure or data quality issue rather than a healthcare code set versioning failure.


Taxonomy

The full taxonomy of 63 failure types across 10 categories is maintained at:
github.com/vaishsagar-cfo/toph-eval/blob/main/TAXONOMY.md

This dataset covers one scenario per category. Contributions adding additional scenarios are welcomed via the GitHub repository.


Citation

Sagar, V. (2026). Pipeline Failure Taxonomy and Evaluation Benchmark
for Enterprise Health Technology Data Pipelines (Version 0.1).
Virgo Machine Labs.
https://github.com/vaishsagar-cfo/toph-eval

Virgo Machine Labs · virgomachinelabs.com · Built in Minnesota

Downloads last month
120