text stringlengths 0 6.73k |
|---|
details of the gas motions in the cap explosion, yet we could predict the velocities |
with which the bodies came apart, for example. Another interesting example is |
rocket propulsion. A rocket of large mass, ă, ejects a small piece, oŸ mass mm, |
with a terrific velocity V relative to the rocket. After this the rocket, If it were |
originally standing still, will be moving with a smaill velocity, ø. sing the |
principle of conservation of momentum, we can calculate this velocity to be |
b=T: V. |
So long as material is being ejected, the rocket continues to pick up speed. Roecket |
propulsion is essentially the same as the recoil of a gun: there is no need for any |
air to push against. |
10-5 Relativistic momentum |
In modern times the law oŸ conservation of momentum has undergone certain |
modifcations. However, the law is still true today, the modifications being mainly |
--- Trang 209 --- |
in the defñnitions of things. In the theory of relativity it turns out that we do have |
conservation of momentum; the particles have mass and the momentum ïs still |
given by ?m0, the mass times the velocity, bu the rmass changes tuïth the uelocit, |
hence the momentum also changes. The mass varies with velocity according to |
the law |
m= TT —0——. (10.7) |
V1=u2/° |
where ?nọ is the mass of the body at rest and e is the speed of light. It is easy to |
see from the formula that there is negligible diference between mm and mo unless |
ò is very large, and that for ordinary velocities the expression for momentum |
reduces to the old formula. |
The components of momentum for a single particle are written as |
Tĩì0U„ ThoUụ TH0uUz |
mm... ——-. ¬=a.. . |
where øŸ = 02+ D + 02. IÝ the z-components are summed over all the interacting |
particles, both before and after a collision, the sums are equal; that is, momentum |
1s conserved in the z-direction. The same holds true in any direction. |
In Chapter 4 we saw that the law of conservation of energy is not valid unless |
we recognize that energy appears in diferent forms, electrical energy, mechanical |
energy, radiant energy, heat energy, and so on. In some of these cases, heat |
energy for example, the energy might be said to be “hidden.” 'This example |
might suggest the question, “Are there also hidden forms of momentum——perhaps |
heat momentum?” 'Phe answer is that it is very hard to hide momentum for the |
following reasons. |
The random motions of the atoms of a body furnish a measure of heat energy, |
1f the sguares of the velocities are summed. 'Phis sum will be a positive result, |
having no directional character. The heat is there, whether or not the body moves |
as a whole, and conservation oŸ energy in the form of heat is not very obvious. |
On the other hand, 1ƒ one sums the 0eloczfzes, which have direction, and fñnds a |
result that is not zero, that means that there is a drift of the entire body in some |
particular direction, and such a gross momentum is readily observed. Thus there |
is no random internal lost momentum, because the body has net momentum only |
when i% moves as a whole. 'Therefore momentum, as a mechanical quantity, 1s |
difcult to hide. Nevertheless, momentum cøø be hidden-—in the electromagnetic |
ñeld, for example. 'This case is another efect of relativity. |
--- Trang 210 --- |
One of the propositions of Newton was that interactions at a distance are |
instantaneous. Ït turns out that such is not the case; in situations involving elec- |
trical forces, for instance, 1ƒ an electrical charge at one location is suddenly moved, |
the efects on another charge, at another place, do not appear instantaneousÌy—— |
there is a little delay. In those circumstances, even If the forces are equal the |
momentum will not check out; there will be a short time during which there will |
be trouble, because for a while the first charge will feel a certain reaction force, |
say, and will picek up some momentum, but the second charge has felt nothing |
and has not yet changed its momentum. lt takes time for the inÑuence tO cross |
the intervening distance, which it does at 186,000 miles a second. In that tiny |
time the momentum of the particles is not conserved. OÝ course after the second |
charge has felt the efect of the first one and all is quieted down, the momentum |
cequation will check out all right, but during that small interval momentum is not |
conserved. We represent this by saying that during this interval there is another |
kind of momentum besides that of the particle, mu, and that is momentum in |
the electromagnetic field. If we add the feld momentum to the momentum of |
the particles, then momentum is conserved at any moment all the time. “The |
fact that the electromagnetic field can possess momentum and energy makes that |
fñeld very real, and so, for better understanding, the original idea that there are |
Jjust the forces bebween particles has to be modified to the idea that a particle |
makes a field, and a field acts on another particle, and the field itself has such |
familiar properties as energy content and momentum, just as particles can have. |
To take another example: an electromagnetic fñeld has waves, which we call light; |
it turns out that light also carries momentum with it, so when light impinges |
on an object 1% carries in a certain amount of momentum per second; this is |
equivalent to a force, because if the illuminated object is picking up a certain |
amount of momentum per second, its momentum is changing and the situation |
1s exactly the same as If there were a force on it. Light can exert pressure by |
bombarding an object; this pressure is very small, but with sufficiently delicate |
apparatus it is measurable. |
Now in quantum mechanics it turns out that momentum is a diferent thing—— |
1E is no longer rm0. It is hard to defñne exactly what is meant by the velocity oŸ a |
particle, but momentum still exists. In quantum mechanies the diference is that |
when the particles are represented as particles, the momentum 1s still ru, but |
when the particles are represented as waves, the momentum is measured by the |
number of waves per centimeter: the greater this number of waves, the greater |
the momentum. In spite of the diferences, the law of conservation of momentum |
--- Trang 211 --- |
holds also in quantum mechanics. Even though the law #! = rma is false, and |
all the derivations of NÑewton were wrong for the conservation oŸ momentum, in |
quantum mechanics, nevertheless, in the end, that particular law maintains itselfl |
--- Trang 212 --- |
Weoe£or-s |
11-1 Symmetry in physỉcs |
In this chapter we introduce a subject that is technically known in physics |
as sumưmnetrụ tín phụsical lau. The word “symmetry” is used here with a special |
meaning, and therefore needs to be defñned. When is a thing symmetrical—how |
can we defne it? When we have a picture that is symmetrical, one side 1s |
somehow the same as the other side. Professor Hermann Weyl has given this |
defnition of symmetry: a thing is symmetrical iŸ one can subject it to a certain |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.