text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
in terms of a 1 m readout weights by |
FinallytheoutputisextractedbyanoutputweightWout × |
(1 N dimensional matrix): y =Woutr(k). (50) |
× k |
Woutσ(Winx). (45) Thenthelearningtaskistodeterminetheparametersin |
Win,W,andWout byusingtheteacherdata x ,y¯ L |
The parameters in Win and Wout are trained such that { k k }k=1 |
so as to minimize an error between the teacher y¯ and |
the error between the output and teacher data becomes { k } |
the output y of the network. |
minimum. While this optimization problem is highly { k } |
nonlinear, a gradient based optimization, so-called back |
propagation, can be employed. To improve a representa- |
C. Reservoir approach |
tion power of the model, we can concatenate the linear |
transformation and the activation function as follows: |
While the representation power of the recurrent neu- |
(cid:16) (cid:16) (cid:17)(cid:17) |
Woutσ W(l) σ W(1)σ(Winx) , (46) ral network can be improved by increasing the number |
··· |
of the nodes, it makes the optimization process of the |
whichiscalledmulti-layerperceptronordeepneuralnet- weights hard and unstable. Specifically, the back prop- |
work. agation based methods always suffer from the vanishing |
gradient problem. The idea of reservoir computing is to |
resolvethisproblembymappinganinputintoacomplex |
B. Temporal task higher dimensional feature space, i.e., reservoir, and by |
performing simple linear regression on it. |
The above task is not a temporal task, meaning that Let us first see a reservoir approach on a feedforward |
theinputdataisnotsequentialbutgivensimultaneously neural network, which is called extreme learning ma- |
like the recognition task of images for hand written lan- chine [44]. The input data x is fed into a network like |
guage, pictures and so on. However, for a recognition multi-layerperceptron, whereallweightsarechosenran- |
of spoken language or prediction of time series like stock domly. The states of the hidden nodes at some layer is |
6 |
now regarded as basis functions of the input x in the A. Quantum extreme learning machine |
feature space: |
The idea of quantum extreme learning machine lies in |
φ 1(x),φ 2(x),...,φ N(x) . (51) using a Hilbert space, where quantum states live, as an |
{ } |
enhanced feature space of the input data. Let us denote |
Nowtheoutputisdefinedasalinearcombinationofthese thesetofinputandteacherdataby x(j),y¯(j) . Suppose |
{ } |
we have an n-qubit system, which is initialized to |
(cid:88) |
w iφ i(x)+w 0 (52) 0 ⊗n. (54) |
i | (cid:105) |
In order to feed the input data into quantum system, a |
and hence the coefficients are determined simply by the unitary operation parameterized by x, say V(x), is ap- |
linear regression as mentioned before. If the dimen- plied on the initial state: |
sion and nonlinearity of the the basis functions are high |
V(x)0 ⊗n. (55) |
enough, we can model a complex task simply by the lin- | (cid:105) |
ear regression. For example, if x is one-dimensional data and normal- |
Theechostatenetworkissimilarbutemploysthereser- ized to be 0 x 1, then we may employ the Y-basis |
e−iθY≤ wit≤ |
voir idea for the recurrent neural network [21, 22, 45], rotation h an angle θ =arccos(√x): |
which has been proposed before extreme learning ma- |
e−iθY 0 =√x0 +√1 x1 . (56) |
chine appeared. To be specific, the input weights Win | (cid:105) | (cid:105) − | (cid:105) |
and weight matrix W are both chosen randomly up to The expectation value of Z with respect to e−iθY 0 be- |
| (cid:105) |
an appropriate normalization. Then the learning task is comes |
done by finding the readout weights Wout to minimize |
Z =2x 1, (57) |
the mean square error (cid:104) (cid:105) − |
and hence is linearly related to the input x. To enhance |
(cid:88) |
(y y¯ )2. (53) the power of quantum enhanced feature space, the input |
k k |
− |
could be transformed by using a nonlinear function φ: |
k |
(cid:112) |
θ =arccos( φ(x)). (58) |
This problem can be solved stably by using the pseudo |
inverse as we mentioned before. The nonlinear function φ could be, for example, hyper- |
Forbothfeedforwardandrecurrenttypes,thereservoir bolic tangent, Legendre polynomial, and so on. For |
approach does not need to tune the internal parameters simplicity, below we will use the simple linear input |
ofthenetworkdependingonthetasksaslongasitposses θ =arccos(√x). |
sufficientcomplexity. Therefore,thesystem,towhichthe Ifweapplythesameoperationoneachofthenqubits, |
machine learning tasks are outsourced, is not necessarily we have |
the neural network anymore, but any nonlinear physical |
V(x)0 ⊗n =(√x0 +√1 x1 )⊗n |
system of large degree of freedoms can be employed as | (cid:105) | (cid:105) − | (cid:105) |
a reservoir for information processing, namely, physical (cid:88) (cid:89)(cid:114) x ik |
=(1 x)n/2 i ,...,i . |
reservoir computing [23–36]. − 1 x | 1 n (cid:105) |
i1,...,in k − |
Therefore, we have coefficients that are nonlinear with |
respect to the input x because of the tensor product |
IV. QUANTUM MACHINE LEARNING ON |
structure. Still the expectation value of the single qubit |
NEAR-TERM QUANTUM DEVICES |
operator Z on the kth qubit is 2x 1. However, if we |
k |
− |
measureacorrelatedoperatorlikeZ Z , wecanobtaina |
1 2 |
In this section, we will see QRC and related frame- second order nonlinear output |
works for quantum machine learning. Before going deep |
into the temporal tasks done on QRC, we first explain Z 1Z 2 =(2x 1)2 (59) |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.