text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
1 2 |
≡ |
Here, σ =I⊗3m, we have used the relation |
0 |
σ σ σ ρσ σ σ =0 |
α β α α γ α |
Xα |
for any ρ and β =γ, and defined |
6 |
Ck 2 =D . |
| β| β |
Xk |
Note that |
D = Ck 2 =1. |
β | β| |
Xβ Xβ,k |
It is obvious that |
Tr I⊗m ψ 0 ⊗m + ⊗m ρ =0. |
1 |
h(cid:0) − (cid:1)⊗ ⊗ × i |
7 |
Furthermore, |
Tr I⊗m ψ 0 ⊗m + ⊗m ρ |
2 |
h(cid:0) − (cid:1)⊗ ⊗ × i |
= 1 D Tr I⊗m ψ 0 ⊗m + ⊗m P†σ P ψ 0 ⊗m + ⊗m P†σ P |
β β β |
(3m)! PX,β6=0 h(cid:0) − (cid:1)⊗ ⊗ × (cid:0) ⊗ ⊗ (cid:1) i |
1 |
D (2m (3m 1)!) |
β |
≤ (3m)! × − |
βX6=0 |
2m (3m 1)! |
× − |
≤ (3m)! |
2 |
= . |
3 |
Therefore, |
Tr I⊗m ψ 0 ⊗m + ⊗m ρ 2 , |
before |
h(cid:0) − (cid:1)⊗ ⊗ × i≤ 3 |
which means |
Tr ψ 0 ⊗m + ⊗m ρ Tr I⊗m 0 ⊗m + ⊗m ρ 2 |
before before |
h ⊗ ⊗ × i ≥ h ⊗ ⊗ × i− 3 |
2 |
1 ǫ |
≥ − − 3 |
1 |
= ǫ, |
3 − |
where we have used the assumption that |
p =Tr I⊗m 0 ⊗m + ⊗m ρ 1 ǫ. |
ψpass before |
h ⊗ ⊗ × i≥ − |
Therefore |
1 ⊗m ⊗m 1 |
ψ 0 + ρ 1 ǫ |
2(cid:13) ⊗ ⊗ − before (cid:13)1 ≤ r −(cid:16)3 − (cid:17) |
(cid:13) (cid:13) |
(cid:13) (cid:13) 2 |
= +ǫ. |
r3 |
--- End of pdfs/document_7.pdf --- |
--- Start of pdfs/document_8.pdf --- |
State Stabilization for Gate-Model Quantum Computers |
Laszlo Gyongyosi∗ Sandor Imre† |
Abstract |
9102 |
Gate-modelquantumcomputerscanallowquantumcomputationsinnear-termimplementa- |
tions. Thestabilizationofanoptimalquantumstateofaquantumcomputerisachallenge,since |
itrequiresstablequantumevolutionsviaaprecisecalibrationoftheunitaries. Here,wepropose |
peS a method for the stabilization of an optimal quantum state of a quantum computer through an |
arbitrary number of running sequences. The optimal state of the quantum computer is set to |
maximize an objective function of an arbitrary problem fed into the quantum computer. We |
3 also propose a procedure to classify the stabilized quantum states of the quantum computer |
into stability classes. The results are convenient for gate-model quantum computations and |
]hp-tnauq[ |
near-term quantum computers. |
1 Introduction |
Quantum computers can make possible quantum computations for efficient problem solving [4–22]. |
Gate-based quantum computations represent a way to construct gate-model quantum computers. |
In a gate-model quantum computer architecture, computations are implemented via sequences |
1v44010.9091:viXra |
of unitary operations [12–15,22–30]. Gate-model quantum computers allow establishing experi- |
mental quantum computations in near-term architectures [1–3,38–47]. Practical demonstrations |
of gate-model quantum computers have been already proposed [4–15] and several physical-layer |
developments are currently in progress. |
Finding a stable quantum state of a quantum computer is a challenge, since it requires precise |
unitaries that yield stable quantum evolutions in the quantum computer. The problem is further |
increased if the stable system state must be available for a pre-determined time or for a pre- |
determined number of running sequences. Particularly, the quantum state of a quantum computer |
subject to stabilization also coincides with the optimal quantum state. The optimal quantum state |
of a quantum computer maximizes a particular objective function of an arbitrary computational |
problem fed into the quantum computer. The problem therefore is to fix the quantum state of |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.