text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
12 |
Figure 2: The f (r) relative entropy values between the gate parameters of the stabilized |
D(β(cid:107)β∗) |
system |ϕ(cid:126) (cid:105) and target system |ϕ(cid:126)∗(cid:105) for R running sequences, r = 1,...R, R = 10, E(D(β(cid:107)β∗)) = |
r r |
0.1. (a) N = 1. (b) N = 2. (c) N = 3. (d). Stability parameter δ(r) for the different relative |
entropy values. |
13 |
where we set X as X = 2C2N24π2(cid:14) R2, while C > 0 is a constant, thus (66) is evaluated as |
R |
(cid:90) |
F (f(ϕ(cid:126) )) = 1 2C2N24π2 cos2(cid:0) CN2πr(cid:1) dr |
r R R2 R |
1 |
N (cid:90)2π (68) |
= 2C2N24π2 1 2cos2(cid:0) r(cid:48)(cid:1) dr(cid:48) |
R2 N2π |
1 |
C2N24π2 |
= . |
R2 |
For the target system |ϕ(cid:126)∗(cid:105), the constant C∗ is set as |
r |
f(ϕ(cid:126)∗) = 2(C∗)2N24π2 cos2(cid:0) C∗N2πr(cid:1) , (69) |
r R2 R |
while for |ϕ(cid:126) (cid:105), we set C as C > C∗, thus (65) can be evaluated as |
r |
(cid:12) (cid:12) |
(cid:12) (cid:12) |
(cid:32)(cid:18) C2N24π2(cid:19)(cid:32) (C∗)2N24π2(cid:33)(cid:33) |
(cid:12) (cid:12) |
(cid:12) (cid:116)F(cid:32)F f(ϕ(cid:126)f r( )ϕ(cid:126) −r) C− Ff ( (cid:32)ϕ(cid:126)∗ f) (− (cid:12) |
µ(β,β∗) = (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12)(cid:118) (cid:117) (cid:117) (cid:18) 2N R2 24R π2 2(cid:19)2(cid:33) r r)−(CR ∗2 )2 RN 224π2(cid:33)2 (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12) (cid:12), (70) |
(cid:117) ϕ(cid:126)∗ |
(cid:12) (cid:12) |
where |
(cid:16)(cid:16) C2N24π2(cid:17)(cid:16) (C∗)2N24π2(cid:17)(cid:17) |
F f(ϕ(cid:126) )− f(ϕ(cid:126)∗)− |
r R2 r R2 |
= F (cid:16) f(ϕ(cid:126) )f(ϕ(cid:126)∗)−f(ϕ(cid:126) ) (C∗)2N24π2 − C2N24π2 f(ϕ(cid:126)∗)+ C2N24π2(C∗)2N24π2(cid:17) |
r r r R2 R2 r R2 R2 (71) |
(cid:18) (cid:19) |
= 1 2π3C2(C∗)2N3((C∗−C)sin(N4π(C∗+C))+(C∗+C)sin(N4π(C∗−C))) , |
R ((C∗)2−C2)R3 |
and |
(cid:18) (cid:19) (cid:18) (cid:19) |
(cid:16) (cid:17)2 (cid:16) (cid:17)2 |
F f(ϕ(cid:126) )− C2N24π2 = F f(ϕ(cid:126) )2−2f(ϕ(cid:126) ) C2N24π2 + C2N24π2 |
r R2 r r R2 R2 |
(cid:16) C4N48π4(cid:17) (72) |
= 1 |
R R3 |
C4N48π4 |
= , |
R4 |
thus (70) is simplified as |
(cid:12) (cid:12) |
(cid:12) (cid:12) |
µ(β,β∗) = (cid:12) (cid:12)2π3C2(C∗)2N3((C∗−C)sin(N4 (cid:114)π(C∗+C))+(C∗+C)sin(N4π(C∗−C)))(cid:12) (cid:12). (73) |
(cid:12) C4N48π4(C∗)4N48π4 (cid:12) |
(cid:12) (((C∗)2−C2)R4) (cid:12) |
R4 R4 |
The values of (73) are depicted in Fig. 3. |
InFig.4thedistributionofµ(β,β∗)infunctionofC andC∗ aredepicted, C ∈ [0,1], C∗ ∈ [0,1] |
for different values of N, f(ϕ(cid:126) ) and f(ϕ(cid:126)∗) are evaluated as given in (67) and (69), L = 1, and |
r r |
R = 10 . |
14 |
Figure3: Gateparametervaluesoff(ϕ(cid:126) )andf(ϕ(cid:126)∗)infunctionofrunningsequencer,r = 1,...,R, |
r r |
R = 10, L = 1, for different N, C and C∗, C ∈ [0,1], C∗ ∈ [0,1]. (a-b) N = 1, C = 0.125, C∗ = 0.1. |
(c-d) N = 1, C = 0.3, C∗ = 0.2 (e-f) N = 2, C = 0.5, C∗ = 0.3. (g) The µ(β,β∗) correlation |
values between the gate parameters of (a-f), S is an indexing parameter. |
15 |
(cid:78)(cid:9) (cid:67),(cid:67)(cid:11)(cid:10) (cid:78)(cid:9) (cid:67),(cid:67)(cid:11)(cid:10) (cid:78)(cid:9) (cid:67),(cid:67)(cid:11)(cid:10) |
1 1 1 |
0.9 0.9 0.9 |
0.8 0.8 0.8 |
0.7 0.7 0.7 |
0.6 0.6 0.6 0,8-1 |
C C C 0,6-0,8 |
0.5 0.5 0.5 0,4-0,6 |
0,2-0,4 |
0.4 0.4 0.4 0-0,2 |
0.3 0.3 0.3 |
0.2 0.2 0.2 |
0.1 0.1 0.1 |
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 |
C(cid:11) C(cid:11) C(cid:11) |
(a) (b) (c) |
Figure 4: The distribution of µ(β,β∗) in function of C and C∗ at f(ϕ(cid:126) ) and f(ϕ(cid:126)∗), L = 1, R = 10. |
r r |
(a) N = 1. (b) N = 2. (c) N = 3. |
6 Conclusions |
Here, we defined a method for the learning of stable quantum evolutions in gate-model quantum |
computer architectures. The model stabilizes an optimal state of a quantum computer to maximize |
theparticularobjectivefunctionofanarbitraryproblemfedintothequantumcomputer. Themodel |
learns a stabilizer matrix that stabilizes the state of the quantum computer through an arbitrary |
number of run sequences. We also defined a scheme to characterize the stability of the stabilized |
states via unsupervised learning of the stability classes of the stabilized sequences. The results |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.