text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
Already scientists have built rudimentary quantum system and its time evolution. Classical computers |
computers in the research laboratory to run quan- are being used for quantum simulation in design- |
tumalgorithmsandperformcertaincalculations.In- ing novel molecules and creating innovative nano- |
tensive research efforts are under way around the products. Quantum computers built upon quantum |
world to investigate a number of technologies that systems may excel in simulating naturally occurring |
could lead to more powerful and more prevalent quantumsystems,whilelargequantumsystemsmay |
quantumcomputersinthenearfuture.Itisbelieved be impossible to simulate in an efficient manner by |
that quantum information and quantum bits are to classical computers. A quantum system with b dis- |
lead toa21stcentury technological revolution much tinct components may bedescribed with b quantum |
as classic information and classic bits did to the bits in a quantum computer, while a classical com- |
20th century. Since the theory of quantum mechan- puter requires 2b bits of memory to store its quan- |
ics is fundamentally stochastic, randomnessand un- tum state. This advantage allows quantum comput- |
certaintyaredeeplyrootedinquantumcomputation ers to efficiently simulate general quantum systems |
and quantum information. As a result, quantum al- that are not efficiently simulatable on classical com- |
gorithms are of random nature in the sense that puters. |
they yield correct solutions only with some prob- In this article we review the concepts of quantum |
abilities, and Monte Carlo methods are widely em- computationandintroducequantumalgorithmsand |
ployed in quantum simulation. Thus statistics has quantum simulation. The quantum algorithms are |
an important role to play in quantum computation, known to be much faster than the available classi- |
quantum simulation and quantum information. On cal algorithms. Statistical analyses of quantum al- |
theotherhand,quantumcomputationandquantum gorithms and quantum simulation are provided. We |
simulation have tremendous potential to revolution- give a brief description on quantum information. |
ize computational statistics. Thearticlesectionsstartwithpresentationsinbroad |
A quantum system is generally described by its brushstrokes, followed by specific discussions along |
state, and the state is mathematically defined to be withsomemathematicalderivationsifnecessary.The |
a unit vector in some complex Hilbert space. The intention is to give each topic first an overview and |
numberofcomplexnumbersrequiredtocharacterize then a general description and a precise characteri- |
the quantum state usually grows exponentially with zation.Itisrecommendedtofocusonthequalitative |
thesizeofthesystem,ratherthanlinearly,asoccurs discussions but skip the derivations for the readers |
in classical systems. As a consequence, it takes an who would like to get a quick picture of quantum |
exponential number of bits of memory on a classical computation and quantum simulation. |
computer to store the quantum state, which puts The rest of the paper proceeds as follows. Sec- |
classical computers in a difficult position to simu- tion 2 briefly introduces quantum mechanics, quan- |
late a quantum system. On the other hand, nature tum probability and quantum statistics. Section 3 |
quantum systems are able to store and keep track reviewsbasicconceptsofquantumcomputation and |
of an exponential number of complex numbers and entanglement.Section4illustratessomewidelyknown |
3 |
QUANTUMCOMPUTATIONAND QUANTUMINFORMATION |
quantumalgorithmsandprovidesastatisticalframe- tummechanics,Holevo(1982),Parthasarathy(1992) |
workforthestudyofquantumalgorithms.Section 5 andWang(1994)forquantumprobabilityandquan- |
presents quantum simulation and discusses its sta- tumstochastic processes,andArtiles, GillandGu¸t˘a |
tistical analysis. Section 6 gives a short description (2005) and Barndorff-Nielsen, Gill and Jupp (2003) |
on quantum information theory. Section 7 features for quantum statistics. |
concluding remarks and lists some open research |
2.1 Hilbert Space and Operator |
problems. |
For the sake of simplicity we choose to work with |
2. BRIEF BACKGROUND REVIEW ON comparativelyeasyfinite-dimensionalsituations.De- |
QUANTUM THEORY note by C the set of all complex numbers. We start |
with vector space in linear algebra. A simple exam- |
Quantum mechanics has been applied to every- |
ple of vector space is Ck consisting of all k-tuples |
thing under and inside the Sun,from chemical reac- |
tion and superconductor to the structure of DNA of complex numbers (z 1,...,z k). The elements of |
and nuclear fusion in stars. Although the signifi- a vector space are called vectors. As in quantum |
cant difference between classical physics and quan- mechanics and quantum computation, we use Dirac |
tum physics lies in the quantum prediction of phys- notations (which is called ket) and (which is |
|·i h·| |
ical entity when the scale of observations becomes called bra) to indicate that the objects are column |
comparabletotheatomic orsub-atomicscale,many vectors or row vectors in the vector space, respec- |
macroscopic properties of systems can only be fully tively. Denote by superscripts , and the conju- |
∗ ′ † |
explained and understoodby quantum physics. The gate of a complex number, the transpose of a vec- |
quantum world is extremely strange, and quantum tor or matrix, and conjugate transpose operation, |
theory is completely counterintuitive. Light waves respectively. We define an inner producton the vec- |
behave like particles and particles behave like waves tor space to be a function that takes as input two |
(wave particle duality);matter cangofromonespot vectors from the vector space and produces a com- |
to another without moving through the intermedi- plex number as output. For u and v in the vec- |
| i | i |
ate space (quantum tunneling); information can be tor space, we denote their inner product by uv . |
h | i |
moved across a vast distance without transmitting The inner product must satisfy (i) conjugate sym- |
it through the intervening space (quantum telepor- metry, uv =( v u ) ∗; (ii) linearity in the second |
h | i h | i |
tation). Quantum theory provides a mathematical argument, uv +w = uv + uw ; (iii) positive- |
h | i h | i h | i |
description of wave particle duality and interaction definiteness, uu 0 with equality only for u=0. |
example,hC| i h≥ |
of matter and energy. It describes the time evolu- For k as a natural inner product |
tions of physical systems via wave functions. The |
k |
wave functions encapsulate the probabilities that uv = u v =(u ,...,u )(v ,...,v ), |
∗j j ∗1 ∗k 1 k ′ |
particles are to be found in a given state at a given h | i |
Xj=1 |
time. For example, the probability of finding a pho- |
where u =(u ,...,u ) and v =(v ,...,v ). An |
ton in some region is the square of the modulus 1 k 1 k ′ |
h | | i |
inner product induces a norm u = uu , and |
of a wave function, and, since at some point the |
k k h | i |
a distance u v between u and pv . For the |
sum of two wave functions can be zero but neither |
k − k | i | i |
finite-dimensional case, a Hilbert space is simply |
wave function is zero, probabilities appear to can- |
H |
a vector space with an inner product. |
cel out each other in a way totally unexpected from |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.