text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
−⊗ | i k −⊗ | ik | − i∼| − i |
Since Alice, and the third qubit to Bob. Note that Alice’s |
second qubit and Bob’s third qubit are from the |
I Mϕ ϕ =I Q ϕ ϕ I Q ϕ ϕ |
+ + + + |
⊗ | −i ⊗ | −i− ⊗ −| −i entangledBellstate.Second,Aliceappliesacontrol- |
= −|ϕ +ϕ −i, NOT gate to her qubits in |ϕ and obtains |
0 |
i |
I ⊗M |ϕ −ϕ + i= |ϕ −ϕ + i, |ϕ 1 i= √1 2[α 0 |0 i( |00 i+ |11 i)+α 1 |1 i( |10 i+ |01 i)]. |
that is, the post-measurement state ϕ ϕ (or |
+ Third,sheappliesaHadamardgatetothefirstqubit |
ϕ ϕ ) is the eigenvector of I M co| rrespo− ni ding |
+ in ϕ and gets |
t| o− eigeni value 1 (or +1), perfor⊗ ming measurement | 1 i |
on I ⊗M in t− he post-measurement state must al- |ϕ 2 i= 1 2[α 0( |0 i+ |1 i)( |00 i+ |11 i) |
ways yield measurement result 1 (or +1). Thus, |
+α (0 1 )(10 + 01 )]. |
− 1 |
the measurement results of M on the two qubits of | i−| i | i | i |
We regroup the terms of ϕ and rewrite it as fol- |
ψ are always opposite to each other. 2 |
| i |
| i lows: |
3.3.2 Quantum teleportation Quantum teleporta- |
tion is a process by which we can transfer the state |ϕ 2 i= 21[ |00 i(α 0 |0 i+α 1 |1 i)+ |01 i(α 0 |1 i+α 1 |0 i) |
of a qubit from one location to another, without |
+ 10 (α 0 α 1 ) |
0 1 |
transmitting it through the intervening space. We | i | i− | i |
+ 11 (α 1 α 0 )]. |
illustrate the phenomenon as follows. Alice and Bob 0 1 |
| i | i− | i |
together generated a Bell state long ago. Each took The new expression has four terms, and each term |
onequbitoftheBellstatewhentheysplit.Nowthey has Alice’s qubits in one of four possible states 00 , |
arefarawayfromeachother.ThemissionforAliceis 01 , 10 and 11 , and Bob’s qubit is in the s| tati e |
to deliver a qubit ψ to Bob,whileheis hiding,and | relai te| d i to the| orii ginal state ψ . If Alice performs |
she can only send| ci lassical information to Bob but a measurement on her qubit| s ai nd informs Bob of |
does not know the state of the qubit ψ . Quantum the measurement result, then his post-measurement |
| i |
teleportation is a way that Alice utilizes the entan- state is completely determined. For example, the |
gled Bell state to send a qubit of unknown state to first term has Alice’s qubits in the state 00 and |
Bob, with only a small overhead of classical com- | i |
Bob’s qubit in state ψ . Therefore, if Alice’s mea- |
munication. Recently a breakthrough in quantum | i |
surementresultonherqubitsis00,thenBob’squbit |
teleportation has been made by successfully trans- |
willbeinstate ψ .BelowisalistofBob’sfourpost- |
ferringcomplex quantumdata instantaneously from | i |
measurement states corresponding to the results of |
one place to another, paving the way for real-world |
Alice’s measurements: |
applications of quantum communications (Lee et al. |
00 α 0 +α 1 , 01 α 1 +α 0 , |
(2011)). 0 1 0 1 |
→ | i | i → | i | i |
Here is how it works. Alice interacts the qubit ψ 10 α 0 α 1 , 11 α 1 α 0 . |
to be teleported with her half of the Bell state, a| ndi → 0 | i− 1 | i → 0 | i− 1 | i |
As Alice’s measurement outcome on her qubits is |
then performs a measurement on the two interacted |
one of 00,01,10 and 11, depending on her measure- |
qubits to obtain one of four possible two-classical- |
ment outcome Bob’s qubit will be one of the above |
bit results: 00,01,10 and 11. She sends the two-bit |
four possible states. Once Alice sends to Bob her |
informationviaclassicalcommunicationtoBob.De- |
two-classical-bit measurement outcome through |
pending on Alice’s classical message, Bob performs |
a classical channel, he applies appropriate quantum |
one of four operations on his half of the Bell state. |
gates to his state and recovers ψ . For example, if |
Surprisingly, the described procedure allows Bob to |
| i |
her measurement is 00, Bob’s state is ψ , and he |
recover the original state ψ . |
| i |
| i does not need to apply any quantum gate. If her |
Specifically assumethatthestate tobeteleported |
measurement is 01, then Bob needs to apply a σ |
is ψ =α 0 +α 1 ,whereα andα areunknown x |
0 1 0 1 |
| i | i | i gate to his state α 1 +α 0 and yields ψ . If her |
amplitudes. First, consider a three-qubit state 0 1 |
| i | i | i |
measurement is 10, then applying a σ gate to his |
z |
00 + 11 |
|ϕ 0 i= |ψ i| i √2| i s mta et ne tα is0 | 10 1i ,− tα h1 e| n1 i BB oo bb cr ae nco five xrs up|ψ hi. isIf sh taer tem αeas 1ure- |
0 |
| i− |
1 α 0 to recover ψ by applying first a σ gate and |
1 x |
= [α 0 (00 + 11 )+α 1 (00 + 11 )], | i | i |
√2 0 | i | i | i 1 | i | i | i then a σ z gate. Here the σ x and σ z gates are de- |
10 |
Y.WANG |
fined by Pauli matrices σ and σ given by (7). Suppose X , i = 1,2,3,4, are four random vari- |
x z i |
In summary, according to Alice’s measurement out- ables taking values 1. Consider an ordinary exper- |
± |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.