text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
bits of the original problem, whereas n−k is the number of |
and instability of quantum characteristics. |
input bits for the decomposed subfunctions. |
• We conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate the |
Next,wediscussresourceallocationproblemsindistributed |
importance and effectiveness of the proposed optimal |
computing, quantum computing, and DQC, which is the mo- |
resource allocation scheme, which achieves the lowest |
tivation for our work, as follows: |
total deployment cost. |
1) Resource Allocation in Distributed Computing: To en- |
hance the performance of distributed computing, the au- |
II. RELATEDWORK |
thors [16] reviewed existing resource allocation schemes |
Quantumcomputingwasdevelopedtoincreasethecapabil- under dynamic environments in distributed computing |
ityofexistingcomputationalresources[12].Oneofchallenges withvarioustypesofclassicalresources,e.g.,computing, |
inquantumcomputingisquantumalgorithmsimplementedon power, and storage resources. In particular, the authors |
quantum computers, for example, Shor’s [6] and Grover’s [7] in [17] formulated the problem of resource allocation in |
algorithms are requiring a massive number of qubits to exe- cloud computing as a stochastic programming model by |
cute. For instance, Shor’s algorithm was developed to handle considering the uncertainty of user requirements. |
a factorization problem with around 106 qubits, which is too 2) ResourceAllocationinQuantumComputing:Theauthors |
complex for classical computers [6]. In addition, Grover’s in[18],[19]proposedandanalyzedthesignificanceofre- |
algorithmwaspresentedtosearchunordereddatabyencoding source allocation problems and adaptive resource alloca- |
√ |
inputs with dimension N as superposition with N qubits, tionproblems,respectively,inquantumcloudcomputing, |
quantum computers to exchange qubits, as shown in Fig. 2. |
Oracle diffuser |
operator The quantum teleportation transfers a pair of qubits executing |
Quantum Computer 1 Quantum gates |
fromthesourcetothedestinationquantumcomputerstolocal |
|0⟩ |
operationsandthenmeasuresthequbitsprevioustothequbits’ |
|0⟩ decoherence (i.e., loss of information in qubits due to the |
instability of quantum characteristics). Consequently, multiple |
Quantum teleportation |
|0000⟩ Quantum Computer 2 quantum computers can connect and collaborate to complete |
|0⟩ computational tasks. The quantum computers interconnected |
via links are directional with a fixed capacity, indicated by |
|0⟩ |
C >0, where i and j are two connected quantum comput- |
i,j |
Measurement ers.However,errorsmayoccurwhilepreservingtheentangled |
qubits between quantum computers. In particular, the fidelity |
Fig. 2: A procedure of distributed quantum computing of two |
of the shared Bell pair, indicated by q , is a performance |
quantum computers with quantum teleportation. i,j |
that measures the effectiveness of the entanglement between |
thedesiredandactualstatesofthequantumteleportation[21]. |
The range of fidelity is [0,1], where 1 refers to the best |
usingquantumandcloudcharacteristicssuchasexecution |
performance that the maximally entangled qubits can be |
times, cloud query times, and circuit compilation times. |
reached [20]. |
3) Resource Allocation in Distributed Quantum Computing: |
In [20], the authors proposed network flow optimization |
C. Uncertainty |
for DQC. The authors used a weighted round-robin |
We classified the uncertainty in DQC into three types, i.e., |
algorithmtopre-computetrafficflowsforallthepossible |
i) the demand of the computational task, ii) the availability |
paths for each application and then allocate resources to |
and computing power of the quantum computers, and iii) the |
the applications in the round-robin, where the maximum |
fidelityoftheentangledqubits.LetΩ={ω ,...,ω }denote |
net rate of the application is a ratio of the round size 1 |Ω| |
thesetofscenariosthatdescribesthedemandofcomputational |
proportional to its weight. |
tasks, the computing power of quantum computers, and the |
However, all the existing studies overlook the issue of |
fidelity of the Bell pairs, where |Ω| is the number of total |
quantum resource allocation, e.g., quantum computers and |
scenarios.Letπ(ω)betheprobabilitythatthescenarioω ∈Ω |
channels,inadditiontotheuncertaintyofquantumcomputing |
is realized, where π(ω) can be calculated based on historical |
demands, computational power, and fidelity in DQC, which |
data [17]. |
directly affects the use of quantum resources in DQC. |
i) The actual demands of computational tasks are unknown |
III. SYSTEMMODEL at the time of deploying the quantum computer. Differ- |
ent computational tasks such as minimization, material |
A. System Overview |
science, and machine learning problems may require |
We consider the system model of a quantum computer various qubits [22]. For example, 58 qubits are required |
operator that provisions a quantum computing task by using inmaterialscienceproblems[23].Letn˜(ω)beaninteger |
quantum computers as shown in Fig.1. Thereare twooptions parameter indicating the demand of computational tasks. |
for the quantum computer operator to compute computational ii) The precise availability and computing power of the |
tasks on DQC, i.e., using the deployed quantum computers or quantum computer are unknown since it could be set |
usingon-demandquantumcomputersfromotherorganizations aside for other applications or because its backend might |
such as Amazon Braket [11]. Let J = {1,...,j,...,J} not support all of them [24]. Let k˜ (ω) be an integer |
j |
be a set of quantum computers. The number of quantum parameterindicatingthecomputingpowerofthequantum |
bits, or qubits (a quantum computation unit), is required to computer j in qubits. |
complete the computational task, denoted by n. In addition, iii) Specifically, the fidelity of the shared entangled qubits, |
n qubits mean that n classical bits can represent up to 2n also known as the Bell pair, in DQC is also not known |
differentpossibilities[12].Indetail,weconsiderthatquantum exactly [21]. Let q˜ (ω) denote the fidelity of the Bell |
i,j |
computerj ownsk j qubits.Alternatively,on-demandquantum pair between quantum computers i and j. |
computerscanbepurchasedfromotherorganizationsandthen For example, n˜(ω) = 1,k˜ (ω) = 2, and q˜ (ω) = 0.5 |
1 1,2 |
connectedacrossthedeployedquantumcomputerstocompute mean that the demand of the computational task is 1 qubit |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.