text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
gates are used to add the result bitwise to the bits in y. Now the computation |
reads (suppressing the initial x-copying), |
(x,¯0,¯0,y) (x,f(x),g(x),y) (x,f(x),g(x),y f(x)). (2.21) |
→ → ⊕ |
All steps performed in this computation up to the last ones involving y are |
reversible and none of them affects the fourth register, so reversing this part of |
the computation, yields |
(x,f(x),g(x),y f(x)) (x,¯0,¯0,y f(x)). (2.22) |
⊕ → ⊕ |
The complete computation now reads |
(x,¯0,¯0,y) (x,¯0,¯0,y f(x)). (2.23) |
→ ⊕ |
Note that this is still a reversible computation, as the part could also be |
⊕ |
reversed,giving the bit stringy back. But, of course,we don’twantto do that. |
So, suppressing the ancilla bit strings, we have simply |
(x,y) (x,y f(x)). (2.24) |
→ ⊕ |
2.4.4 Reversible computation and physics |
Uptothispointwehaveonlydiscussed”logical”reversibility. Thecomputation |
is reversible in the sense that the input can be recovered from the output by |
carefullykeepingtrackofeverybitduringthecomputation. Thisisverycloseto |
”physical” reversibility by which is meant that the time evolution of a physical |
system can be reversed so that an initial state of the system can be recovered |
from a final state. When a computational process is carried out by a physical |
system16 there is precisely such a time evolution involved, so the two concepts |
of reversibility must be closely connected. |
16Theremustalwaysbesomeunderlyingphysicalsystemperformingthecomputation,even |
whencomputationisviewedabstractlyasmeresymbolshuffling. Someoneorsomethingmust |
shufflethesymbols. |
46 |
The microscopical laws of dynamics are all reversible, whether classical or |
quantum. Reversible dynamics does not dissipate any energy. In order for this |
to make sense one must really talk about closed physical systems, i.e. systems |
that do not in any way interact with the environment. One must also have full |
controloveralldegreesoffreedom,i.e. the dynamicsofeverydegreeoffreedom |
must be governed by fundamental (time-reversible) equations of motion. Such |
systems are conservative, meaning that the time evolution is reversible and no |
energy is dissipated into the environment. |
Comparingthistoacomputationalprocesswecanguessthatitisthelossof |
control of some of the individual bits, inadvertently or deliberately, that leads |
to energy dissipation in a computational process. |
Indeed, as has been studied by Landauer [5], erasure of one bit of informa- |
tion leads to an energy dissipation given by k T ln2. Here k is Boltzmann’s |
B B |
constant, a fundamental constant of physics relating mechanical quantities to |
thermodynamical quantities like energy and entropy. T is the temperature of |
the environment into which the energy is dissipated. |
Physically, this possibility of performing computations reversibly is of more |
theoretical interest than practical. The solid state hardware of today dissi- |
pate energy far above the k T ln2 limit. Even if solid state circuits can be |
b |
manufactured that performs reversible logical operations like the Toffoli gate, |
these devices must be poweredby some voltage source like any other electronic |
gate. Tiny electric current will flow and there will be heat dissipation from |
electric resistance. Even if this effect can be minimized, perhaps by exploiting |
superconductivity, the inevitable weak interaction with the environment will |
generate noise that will have to be corrected. The error correction registers |
employed must eventually be erased, since memory is always finite, leading to |
energy dissipation. |
For now, classicalreversiblecomputationservesjust as a backdropto quan- |
tumcomputation,whichisinherentlyreversible. Wewillreturntothesubjectof |
reversiblecomputationinchapter8onphysicsofcomputation,andinparticular |
to the question of the thermodynamics of computation. |
2.5 Comparison to real computers |
Neither the Turing machine model nor the circuit model is very close to the |
actual workings of a modern digital computer. In what sense then are they |
models of real world computers? It is generally agreed that all present day |
general purpose digital computers are von Neumann machines, machines that |
store both data and program in a memory and which works in a cyclic way of |
(fetching instructions and data, executing instructions, storing data). This is a |
rathervaguedescriptionofthebasicworkingsofacomputerandcannotbyitself |
serveasa modelofcomputation. Thereis howevera computationalmodelthat |
very closely captures the workingsof a modern computer - the Random Access |
Machine-model. It has a CPU with temporary storage registers, a program |
counterandanALU-muchasinarealworldprocessor. TheCPUisconnected |
47 |
to a (random access) memory which stores both data and program. In order |
to read and write in arbitrary memory locations, every memory cell have an |
address. The model can be programmed in an assembly-like language. It is |
clear from the close analogy to real computers that the model has expressive |
strength enough to support compilers and higher level languages. |
The maindifference betweenthe Turingmachine andrealcomputersis that |
its memory is not accessible immediately. In order to read a square away from |
the present position of the read/write head, all intermediate squares must be |
traversedand read. |
The RandomAccess Machine(RAM) canreachanarbitrarymemorycellin |
a single step. It can be considered a simplified model of real world computers. |
The same functions are computable on Turing machines and on the RAM. |
2.6 Non-deterministic Turing Machines |
Themodelsofcomputationconsideredsofararedeterministic,i.e. ateachstep |
inthecomputation,thenextstepisexactlydeterminedbytheprogramandthe |
data. However,non-deterministic models of computation are theoretically very |
important and often lead to simplification of analysis, though they cannot in |
generalbe efficiently implemented. Referring back to the definition of a Turing |
machine, we see that in the set of instructions defining the program,there is at |
most one instruction with a certain combination of scanned tape symbol and |
machine state. This makes the computation deterministic, i.e. the action of |
the machine is uniquely determined. Removing this restriction leads to non- |
determinism. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.