text
stringlengths
0
8.13M
Asinka+Bcoska=0
n
which reduce to
Asinka=0
.
Bcoska=0
n
Since these sine and cosine expressions cannot be simultaneously zero, we
get the solutions
A=0 and coska=0 ka=nπ/2 with n odd
⇒ .
(cid:26)B =0 and sinka=0 ka=nπ/2 with n even
In fact it suffices to restrict the solutions to non-negative integers. The
reasonis thatthe solutionsfornegativeintegersarenotlinearlyindependent of
the solutions with positive integers. This is apparent from the explicit form of
the solutions
Bcos(nπx/2a), n odd
u (x)= . (4.14)
n (cid:26)Asin(nπx/2a), n even
Changing n to n in these formulas have no effect for the cosine solutions,and
for the sine solutions, the ensuing change of sign for sine can be absorbed into
the constant A.
TheconstantsAandB arenormalizationconstantstobedeterminedbythe
normalization condition
a
u n(x)∗u n(x)dx=1 (4.15)
Z
a
where ’*’ denotes complex conjugation. Clearly, some normalization of the
solutions is needed, and this particular one is related to the interpretation of
quantummechanicswherethewavefunctionsψ(x)areinterpretedasprobability
amplitudes. To say that ψ is a probability amplitude is to say that the integral
d
ψ(x) ψ(x)dx
Z
c
is the probability of detecting the particle in the interval (c,d).
In fact, an even stronger property of our solutions can be inferred:
a 1, if n=m
u (x) u (x)dx=δ = . (4.16)
Z n ∗ m nm (cid:26)0, if n=m
a 6
Thisequationexpressestheorthonormality ofthesolutions,i.ethesolutions
are normalized and solutions with different index are orthogonal. This is a
general property of solutions to eigenvalue problems. The general theory will
be spelt out in chapter 5.
73
The solutionsu (x)cannowbe consideredtoformabasisofa linearvector
n
space. Any solution to the wave equation can be expressed as a linear combi-
nation (or superposition) of the basis functions
ψ(x)= α u (x), (4.17)
n n
nX=0
where α are complex numbers. These numbers are arbitrary apart from a
n
globalnormalization. Sincethe totalprobabilityofdetecting the particleinthe
box must be 1, we get
a
ψ(x)∗ψ(x)dx= α∗nα =1 (4.18)
n
Z
−a X0
This follows from a nice calculation involving several of the formulas given
in this section and some trigonometry. Performing this calculation gives quite
a lot of insight into the mathematics of quantum mechanics.
Since we now know k, we can get a formula for the separation constant E,
which is to be interpreted as the energy of the system
¯h2k2 ¯h2 nπ 2 π2¯h2
E = = = n2. (4.19)
n 2m 2m(cid:18)2a(cid:19) 8ma2
In this way we get quantization of the energy. The energy can only take
values determined by the integer n. This is symbolized by indexing the E with
n.
ButwhyisE energy? Thiscanbeunderstoodbygoingbacktotheclassical
n
equationforenergyinterms ofkinetic andpotentialenergyE =K+V. Inour
case, the potential energy is zero inside the box, and we have simply E = K.
Then using the quantization rules we got
1 ∂
E H = ( i¯h )2.
−→ 2m − ∂x
If this Hamiltonian operator is applied to any of the solutions, the result is
1 ∂ nπx
Hu (x)= ( i¯h )2Bcos( )=
n
2m − ∂x 2a
¯h2 nπ nπx ¯h2π2 nπx
( )2Bcos( )=( n2)Bcos( )=E u (x)
n n
2m 2a 2a 8ma 2a
In the next to last expression, we recognize the separation constant (eigen-