text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
Asinka+Bcoska=0 |
n |
− |
which reduce to |
Asinka=0 |
. |
Bcoska=0 |
n |
Since these sine and cosine expressions cannot be simultaneously zero, we |
get the solutions |
A=0 and coska=0 ka=nπ/2 with n odd |
⇒ . |
(cid:26)B =0 and sinka=0 ka=nπ/2 with n even |
⇒ |
In fact it suffices to restrict the solutions to non-negative integers. The |
reasonis thatthe solutionsfornegativeintegersarenotlinearlyindependent of |
the solutions with positive integers. This is apparent from the explicit form of |
the solutions |
Bcos(nπx/2a), n odd |
u (x)= . (4.14) |
n (cid:26)Asin(nπx/2a), n even |
Changing n to n in these formulas have no effect for the cosine solutions,and |
− |
for the sine solutions, the ensuing change of sign for sine can be absorbed into |
the constant A. |
TheconstantsAandB arenormalizationconstantstobedeterminedbythe |
normalization condition |
a |
u n(x)∗u n(x)dx=1 (4.15) |
Z |
a |
− |
where ’*’ denotes complex conjugation. Clearly, some normalization of the |
solutions is needed, and this particular one is related to the interpretation of |
quantummechanicswherethewavefunctionsψ(x)areinterpretedasprobability |
amplitudes. To say that ψ is a probability amplitude is to say that the integral |
d |
ψ(x) ψ(x)dx |
∗ |
Z |
c |
is the probability of detecting the particle in the interval (c,d). |
In fact, an even stronger property of our solutions can be inferred: |
a 1, if n=m |
u (x) u (x)dx=δ = . (4.16) |
Z n ∗ m nm (cid:26)0, if n=m |
a 6 |
− |
Thisequationexpressestheorthonormality ofthesolutions,i.ethesolutions |
are normalized and solutions with different index are orthogonal. This is a |
general property of solutions to eigenvalue problems. The general theory will |
be spelt out in chapter 5. |
73 |
The solutionsu (x)cannowbe consideredtoformabasisofa linearvector |
n |
space. Any solution to the wave equation can be expressed as a linear combi- |
nation (or superposition) of the basis functions |
∞ |
ψ(x)= α u (x), (4.17) |
n n |
nX=0 |
where α are complex numbers. These numbers are arbitrary apart from a |
n |
globalnormalization. Sincethe totalprobabilityofdetecting the particleinthe |
box must be 1, we get |
a |
∞ |
ψ(x)∗ψ(x)dx= α∗nα =1 (4.18) |
n |
Z |
−a X0 |
This follows from a nice calculation involving several of the formulas given |
in this section and some trigonometry. Performing this calculation gives quite |
a lot of insight into the mathematics of quantum mechanics. |
Since we now know k, we can get a formula for the separation constant E, |
which is to be interpreted as the energy of the system |
¯h2k2 ¯h2 nπ 2 π2¯h2 |
E = = = n2. (4.19) |
n 2m 2m(cid:18)2a(cid:19) 8ma2 |
In this way we get quantization of the energy. The energy can only take |
values determined by the integer n. This is symbolized by indexing the E with |
n. |
ButwhyisE energy? Thiscanbeunderstoodbygoingbacktotheclassical |
n |
equationforenergyinterms ofkinetic andpotentialenergyE =K+V. Inour |
case, the potential energy is zero inside the box, and we have simply E = K. |
Then using the quantization rules we got |
1 ∂ |
E H = ( i¯h )2. |
−→ 2m − ∂x |
If this Hamiltonian operator is applied to any of the solutions, the result is |
1 ∂ nπx |
Hu (x)= ( i¯h )2Bcos( )= |
n |
2m − ∂x 2a |
¯h2 nπ nπx ¯h2π2 nπx |
( )2Bcos( )=( n2)Bcos( )=E u (x) |
n n |
2m 2a 2a 8ma 2a |
In the next to last expression, we recognize the separation constant (eigen- |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.