text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
The missing ingredient is precisely the equation (4.32) relating velocity and |
momentum, or rather this equation rewritten so that it relates velocity to the |
momentum derivative of the energy. Differentiating H with respect to p yields |
dH dK d p2 p |
= = = . |
dp dp dp2m m |
But this is precisely the velocity v =dx/dt, so we get |
dH dx |
= . (4.35) |
dp dt |
Thesetwoequations,(4.34)and(4.35),arethefundamentaldynamicalequa- |
tions of classical mechanics. This reformulation of Newtonian mechanics was |
performedduringthe18th and19th centuriesbyEuler,Lagrange,Hamiltonand |
Poisson. It is quite general and it is the formulation of classical mechanics in |
which the translation to quantum mechanics is most easily performed. In the |
general theory, where there might be more than one particle, one considers a |
dynamical system described by a set of dynamical variables (x ,p ) .6 The |
i i |
{ } |
energy, or Hamiltonian is function of these variables. Then the Hamiltonian |
equations of motion become |
dx ∂H |
i |
= (4.36) |
dt ∂p |
i |
dp ∂H |
i |
= . (4.37) |
dt −∂x |
i |
6Thesevariablescanbemoregeneralthanordinarypositionandmomentum,includingfor |
exampleangularvariables. |
79 |
Note how beautiful and symmetrical these equations are! However, they |
can still be rewritten in an even more compact way in which the transition to |
quantum mechanics is most easily performed. In order to do that, consider a |
dynamical system with coordinates and momenta (x ,p ) where the indices |
i i |
{ } |
ranges from 1 to n, n being the number of particles of the system. Let A and |
B be two dynamical variables, both differentiable functions of the xs and ps. |
′ ′ |
The Poisson bracket is defined by |
n |
∂A ∂B ∂B ∂A |
A,B = . (4.38) |
{ } X1 (cid:16)∂x i∂p i − ∂x i∂p i(cid:17) |
As an example, calculate the brackets x,H p,H for a one-dimensional |
{ } { } |
system, i.e n=1. |
∂x∂H ∂H ∂x ∂H |
x,H = = |
{ } ∂x ∂p − ∂x ∂p ∂p |
∂p∂H ∂H ∂p ∂H |
p,H = = |
{ } ∂x ∂p − ∂x ∂p −∂x |
Combiningtheseequationswith(4.36),(4.37)andgeneralizingtonparticles, |
the Hamiltonian equations of motion can be written compactly |
dx |
i |
= x ,H (4.39) |
i |
dt { } |
dp |
i |
= p ,H . (4.40) |
i |
dt { } |
In these equations,coordinates (positions) andmomenta appear completely |
symmetrically. |
Thereadermightfeelthatanedifice(ageneraltheoryofdynamics)hasbeen |
erected on a very tiny base (the harmonic oscillator). That is indeed true. But |
everything in this section can be developed quite rigorously from fundamental |
principles of physics. A good accessible reference is [33]. As a last point, it |
can be shown that the equation of motion for a function F of the dynamical |
variables can be written |
dF ∂F |
= F,H + . (4.41) |
dt { } ∂t |
The second term ∂F/∂t, vanishes if there is no explicit time dependence for |
F. This is often the case. |
4.2.5 Quantization |
Hamilton’s equations for classicaldynamics offers a very natural starting point |
for quantization. The rules are |
80 |
1. Replace classical dynamical variables A with the corresponding quantum |
operators Aˆ |
A Aˆ |
−→ |
2. Replace the Poisson brackets , with commutators [, ] |
{· ·} · · |
1 |
A,B [Aˆ,Bˆ]. |
{ }−→ i¯h |
Upon these replacements,the equations of motion for the operatorsbecome |
dFˆ 1 |
= [Fˆ,Hˆ]. (4.42) |
dt i¯h |
ThisformofquantumdynamicsbearsnoobviousrelationtotheSchr¨odinger |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.