text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
A potentially infinite tape in the quantumcaseimplies a potentially infinite |
dimensional Hilbert space. When a new tape square is added (or activated) |
during the computation, the tape Hilbert space goes from nL-dimensional to |
n(L+1)-dimensional. |
Classicallythis situationis describedby consideringthe setofallstrings Σ |
∗ |
overthe alphabet Σ. The set Σ thus contains all strings that could be written |
∗ |
on the potentially infinite tape. In the quantum case, the state ψ in 6.5 |
L |
| i |
containsalllengthLstrings,providedallthe coefficientsarenonzero. Thus the |
analogueofthe classicalsetΣ oughtto be ψ , which we willdenote as |
∗ iL }∞L=0 |
{| |
Σ , the set of all quantum strings. It is the set of all superpositions of states |
∗Q |
for all string lengths L. |
L |
|S i |
Classically, a language is a subset of Σ , or equivalently, an element of the |
∗ |
power set (Σ ). By analogy, we define a quantum language as a subset of |
∗ |
P |
the set of all quantum states, i.e. as an element of the power set (Σ ) = |
∗Q |
P |
( ψ ). |
iL }∞L=0 |
P {| |
A leaner notation |
The notation introduced so far, being a generalization of classical notions, is a |
bit to heavy handed. Utilizing the economy of the Dirac notation, we write i |
| i |
instead of S , just keeping the indices. In the case of an alphabet with, say n |
i |
| i |
symbols, i can be thought of as ranging over the numbers 1,2,...,n. Thus the |
state of equation (6.3) is written i i i . A general state is then |
1 2 L |
| ··· i |
ψ = α i i i . (6.7) |
iL i1i2 ···iL| 1 2 L |
| ··· i |
X |
In conclusion then, i spans a n-dimensional Hilbert space isomorphic to |
| i |
Cn. Likewise, i i i spans a nL-dimensional Hilbert space isomorphic to |
1 2 L |
| ··· i |
(Cn) L. A general state in this space is given by 6.7. |
⊗ |
Qubits |
Aspecialcaseofthisconstructionisthequbitandthequbitstringcorresponding |
tothealphabet 0,1 . Letxdenoteasinglebit. Aclassicaln-bitstringisthen |
{ } |
”x x ...x ”. A single qubit is denoted by x and a multi qubit state by |
1 2 n |
| i |
x x ...x . These states are called computational basis states or the classical |
1 2 n |
| i |
basis [26]. Measurements on the quantum computer are often thought of as |
beingmade inthis basisanditcanthereforebe consideredasthe connectionto |
classical I/O-streams. |
Aconvenientnotationisoftenusedforthecomputationalbasisstates. Using |
the binary number representationfor naturalnumbers,we candenote the state |
x x ...x = x 2n 1+x 2n 2+...x 2+x . (6.8) |
1 2 n 1 − 2 − n 1 n n |
| i | · · − · i |
123 |
The subscript n is needed to indicate the number of qubits, but is often |
suppressed. An example of this notation is 1001 = 9 . |
4 |
| i | i |
A general state of the quantum computer is a complex linear superposition |
of the basis states |
2n 1 |
− |
α i , (6.9) |
i n |
| i |
Xi=0 |
and the coefficients are again subject to the restriction |
2n 1 |
− |
α 2 =1. (6.10) |
i |
| | |
Xi=0 |
The Hilbert space of one qubit is isomorphic to the complex vector space |
C2, and the n-qubit Hilbert space is isomorphic to (C2) n. Thus, an n-bit |
⊗ |
quantum state carries exponentially more information than an n-bit classical |
string. Classically, it is not possible to linearly combine different bit strings.1 |
We alsorecordthe sometimes convenientexplicitrepresentationofthe basis |
states in terms of 2n-dimensional basis vectors, for example |
0 |
0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.