text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
1 |
qubit gates and CNOT’s. |
Let U be single qubit unitary gate. Then there exist single qubit operators |
A,B and C such that |
ABC =I (6.45) |
eiαAXBXC =U. (6.46) |
Proof |
In terms of the rotation operators (6.18), (6.19) and (6.20), put |
A=R (β)R (γ/2), |
z y |
B =R ( γ/2)R ( (δ+β)/2), |
y z |
− − |
C =R ((δ β)/2). |
z |
− |
Then |
ABC =R (β)R (γ/2)R ( γ/2)R ( (δ+β)/2)R ((δ β)/2)=I. |
z y y z z |
− − − |
Next, using the identities 6.24, 6.25 as well as X2 =I |
XBX =XR ( γ/2)XXR ( (δ+β)/2)=R (γ/2)R ((δ+β)/2), |
y z y z |
− − |
so that |
AXBXC =R (β)R (γ/2)R (γ/2)R ((δ+β)/2)R ((δ β)/2)= |
z y y z z |
− |
R (β)R (γ)R (δ). |
x y z |
Thus U can be decomposed as U =eiαAXBXC with ABC=I. |
These equations allow a decomposition of a general controlled-U operation |
asinfigure6.13. Whenthecontrolqubitis 0 ,theoperationABC isappliedto |
| i |
138 |
= |
U P A B C |
Figure 6.13: Simulation of a controlled-U operation in terms of single qubit |
operations and CNOT’s. |
thetargetqubit. Ontheotherhand,whenthecontrolqubitis 1 ,theoperation |
| i |
P(α)AXBXC is applied to the target qubit. |
In order to obtain a somewhat more simple diagrammatic representation, |
the circuit identity of figure 6.14 is useful. This identity can be derived using |
the methods of section 6.3.7. Using the identity, we get the circuit of figure |
6.15. |
E(a) |
= |
P(a) |
Figure 6.14: Identity between Λ (P(α)) and E(α) I. |
1 |
⊗ |
139 |
E |
= |
U A B C |
Figure 6.15: Simplified decomposition of a controlled-U operation in terms of |
single qubit operations and CNOT’s. |
Thus, the operation Λ (U) can be decomposed into six basic operations. |
1 |
Decomposition of a general Λ (U) gate |
2 |
Foranyunitary2 2operationU,aΛ (U)canbedecomposedasinfigure6.16 |
2 |
× |
where V is a matrix that satisfies V2 =U. |
c |
1 |
c = |
2 |
U V V+ V |
Figure6.16: Simulationofa Λ (U) operationin terms ofΛ (V) operationsand |
2 1 |
CNOT’s. |
140 |
Proof |
The gate construction is proved correct by an examination of the four cases of |
combinations of basis states for the two target qubits c and c |
1 2 |
| i | i |
When c =0 and c =0, I is applied to the target. |
1 2 |
• |
When c =0 and c =1, VV =I is applied to the target. |
1 2 † |
• |
When c =1 and c =0, V V =I is applied to the target. |
1 2 † |
• |
Finally, when c =1 and c =1, VV =U is applied to the target. |
1 2 |
• |
The circuit identities developed so far allow for the decomposition of a gen- |
eral Λ (U) gate in terms of 16 single qubit gates and CNOT gates. A naive |
2 |
countingbasedonfigures6.15and6.16wouldimply the needto use20elemen- |
tary gates, but a closer examinationshows that a few single qubit gates can be |
merged and eliminated. The details are left to the reader. |
Decomposition of a general Λ (U) gate |
n 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.