text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
Classicalinformationtheory(e.g.,[49])is basedonthe classicalbitasfundamentalatom. This |
classical bit, henceforth called cbit, is in one of two classical states t (often interpreted as “true”) |
and f (often interpreted as “false”). It is customary to code the classical logical states by ptq=1 |
and pfq = 0 (psq stands for the code of s). The states can, for instance, be realized by some |
condenser who is discharged ( cbit state 0) or charged ( cbit state 1). |
≡ ≡ |
In quantum information theory (cf. [1, 31, 41, 74, 6, 68, 32, 33]), the most elementary unit of |
information is the quantum bit, henceforth called qbit. Qbits can be physically represented by a |
coherent superposition of the two orthonormal8 states t and f. The qbit states |
x =αt+βf (1) |
α,β |
form a continuum, with α2+ β 2 =1, α,β C. |
| | | | ∈ |
3.1 Coding |
Cbits can then be coded by |
px q=(α,β)=eiϕ(sinω,eiδcosω) , (2) |
α,β |
with ω,ϕ,δ R. Qbits can be identified with cbits as follows |
∈ |
(a,0) 1 and (0,b) 0 , a, b =1 , (3) |
≡ ≡ | | | | |
wherethecomplexnumbersaandbareofmodulusone. Thequantummechanicalstatesassociated |
with the classical states 0 and 1 are mutually orthogonal. |
Notice that, provided that α,β = 0, a qbit is not in a pure classical state. Therefore, any |
6 |
practical determination of the qbit x amounts to a measurement of the state amplitude of t or |
α,β |
f. Any such single measurement will be indeterministic (provided again that α,β = 0). That is, |
6 |
theoutcomeofasinglemeasurementoccursunpredictably. Yet, accordingtotherulesofquantum |
mechanics,theprobabilitiesthattheqbitx ismeasuredinstatestandf isP (x )= (x ,t)2 |
α,β t α,β α,β |
| | |
and P (x )= (x ,f)2 =1 P ( ), respectively. |
f α,β α,β t α,β |
| | − |
The classical and the quantum mechanical concept of information differ from each other in |
several aspects. Intuitively and classically, a unit of information is context-free. That is, it is |
independent of what other information is or might be present. A classical bit remains unchanged, |
nomatterby whatmethods itis inferred. Itobeysclassicallogic. Itcanbe copied. Nodoubts can |
be left. |
By contrast, quantum information is contextual [55] A quantum bit may appear different, |
depending on the method by which it is inferred. Quantum bits cannot be copied or “cloned” |
[97, 35, 67, 71, 44, 26]. Classical tautologies are not necessarily satisfied in quantum information |
theory. Quantum bits obey quantum logic. And, as has been argued before, they are coherent |
superpositions of classical information. |
8 (t,t)=(f,f)=1and(t,f)=0. |
5 |
3.2 Reading the book of Nature—a short glance at the prediction cat- |
alog |
To quote Landauer [59], “What is measurement? If it is simply information transfer, that is done |
all the time inside the computer, and can be done with arbitrary little dissipation.” And, one may |
add, without destroying coherence. |
Indeed,ashasbeenshortlymentionedin(III),thereisreasontobelievethat—atleastuptoa |
certain magnitude of complexity—any measurement can be “undone” by a proper reconstruction |
of the wave-function. A necessary condition for this to happen is that all information about the |
original measurement is lost. In Schr¨odinger’s terms, the prediction catalog (the wave function) |
can be opened only at one particular page. We may close the prediction catalog before reading |
this page. Then we can open the prediction catalog at another, complementary, page again. By |
nowaywecanopenthepredictioncatalogatonepage,readand(irreversibly)memorizethepage, |
close it; then open it at another, complementary, page. (Two non-complementary pages which |
correspond to two co-measurable observables can be read simultaneously.) |
Canwetheninsomesense“undo”knowledgefromconsciousobservation? Thisquestionrelates |
to a statement by Wheeler (cf. [95], p. 184) that “no elementary phenomenon is a phenomenon |
until it is a[[n irreversibly]] registered (observed) phenomenon.” Where does this irreversible ob- |
servation take place? Since the physical laws (with the possible exception of the weak force) are |
time-reversible, the act of irreversible observation must, according to Wigner [96], occur in the |
consciousness, thereby violating quantum mechanics. |
4 Quantum recursion theory |
4.1 Reversible computation and deletion of (q)bits |
As a prelude to quantum computation, we briefly review classical reversible computation [56, 7, |
42,9,61]. This typeofcomputationis characterizedbyasingle-valuedinversetransitionfunction. |
That is, logical functions are performed which do not have a single-valued inverse, such as AND or |
OR; i.e., the input cannotbe deduced fromthe output. Also deletion ofinformationor other many |
(states)-to-one (state) operations are irreversible. Reversible calculation requires every single step |
to be reversible. Figure 1 (cf. [61]) draws the difference between one-to-one and many-to-one |
computation. This logical irreversibility is associated with physical irreversibility and requires a |
minimal heat generation of the computing machine. |
Itispossibletoembedanyirreversiblecomputationinanappropriateenvironmentwhichmakes |
it reversible. For instance, the computing agent could keep the inputs of previous calculations in |
successiveorder. Itcouldsavesavealltheinformationitwouldotherwisethrowaway. Or,itcould |
leave markers behind to identify its trail, the Ha¨nsel and Gretel strategy described by Landauer |
[61]. That, of course, might amount to tremendous overhead in dynamical memory space (and |
time) and would merely postpone the problem of throwing away unwanted information. But, as |
was pointed out by Bennett [7], this overhead could be circumvented by making the computer to |
erase all intermediate results, leaving behind only the desired output and the originally furnished |
input. Bennett’s trick is to do a computation reversibly, then copy its output9 and then, with |
one output as input for the reversible computation, run the computation backwards. In order not |
to consume exceedingly large intermediate storage resources, this strategy could be applied after |
everysinglestep. Thepriceisadoublingofcomputationtime,sinceitrequiresoneadditionalstep |
for the back-computation.10 |
4.2 Selected features of quantum computation |
The following features are necessary but not sufficient qualities of quantum computers. |
(i) Input, output, programand memory are qbits; |
9Copyingcanbedonereversiblyinclassicalphysics,ifthememoryusedforthecopyisinitiallyblank. Quantum |
mechanically,thiscannotbedoneonqbits;cfbelow. |
10 Ifanirreversiblecomputingagent exists whichcomputes theinputfromagivenoutput, then itispossibleto |
translate an irreversiblecomputation from input to output into one which is reversible and erases everything else |
except the final output, including the original input; i.e., that simply maps inputs into outputs. For details, see |
Bennett[7,9]. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.