text stringlengths 0 8.13M |
|---|
b |
a |
c |
phase-shift ϕ a b=aeiϕ |
ϕ → |
a b |
parametric down-conversion a ηb c |
b → i |
a |
NL |
c |
parametric up-conversion a b ηc |
a c i| → |
NL |
b |
amplification A a b;G,N |
G,N i →| i |
a b |
Table 1: “Toolbox” of lossless elements for quantum interference devices. |
20 |
S 1 b M |
✓✏ |
L |
a |
✒✑ |
c P ϕ |
S |
2 D |
1 |
d ✟ |
✠ |
M e |
D |
✡ ✠2 |
Figure 3: Mach-Zehnder interferometer. A single quantum (photon, neutron, electron etc) is |
emitted in L and meets a lossless beam splitter (half-silvered mirror) S , after which its wave |
1 |
function is in a coherent superposition of b and c. In beam path b a phase shifter shifts the phase |
of state b by ϕ. The two beams are then recombined at a second lossless beam splitter (half- |
silvered mirror) S . The quant is detected at either D or D , corresponding to the states d and |
2 1 2 |
e, respectively. |
In present-day quantum optical nonlinear devices (NL), parametric up- or down-conversion, i.e., |
the production of a single quant (particle) from two field quanta (particles) and the production of |
two field quanta (particles) from a single one occurs at the very low amplitude rate of η 10 6. |
− |
≈ |
In what follows, a lossless Mach-Zehnder interferometer drawn in Fig. 3 is discussed. The |
computation proceeds by successive substitution (transition) of states; i.e., |
S : a (b+ic)/√2 , (83) |
1 |
→ |
P : b beiϕ , (84) |
→ |
S : b (e+id)/√2 , (85) |
2 |
→ |
S : c (d+ie)/√2 . (86) |
2 |
→ |
The resulting transition is |
eiϕ+1 eiϕ 1 |
a ψ =i d+ − e . (87) |
→ 2 2 |
(cid:18) (cid:19) (cid:18) (cid:19) |
Assume that ϕ=0, i.e., there is no phase shift at all. Then, equation (87) reduces to a id, and |
→ |
the emitted quant is detected only by D . Assume that ϕ = π. Then, equation (87) reduces to |
1 |
a e,andthe emittedquantisdetectedonlybyD . Ifonevariesthephaseshiftϕ,oneobtains |
2 |
→− |
the following detection probabilities: |
ϕ ϕ |
P (ϕ)= (d,ψ)2 =cos2( ) , P (ϕ)= (e,ψ)2 =sin2( ) . (88) |
D1 D2 |
| | 2 | | 2 |
For some “mindboggling” features of Mach-Zehnder interferometry, see [12]. |
D Universal 2-port quantum gate |
The elementary quantum interference device Tbs depicted in Fig. (4.a) is just a beam splitter |
21 |
followedbyaphaseshifterinoneoftheoutputports. Accordingtothe“toolbox”rulesofappendix |
C, the process can be quantum mechanically described by17 |
P : 0 0eiα+β , (89) |
1 |
→ |
T(ω) iR(ω) |
17 Alternatively, the action of a lossless beam splitter may be described by the matrix = |
iR(ω) T(ω) |
(cid:18) (cid:19) |
cosω isinω eiϕ 0 |
. A phase shifter in twodimensional Hilbert space is represented by either or |
isinω cosω 0 1 |
(cid:18) (cid:19) (cid:18) (cid:19) |
1 0 |
. Theactionoftheentiredeviceconsistingofsuchelements iscalculatedbymultiplyingthematrices |
0 eiϕ |
(cid:18) (cid:19) |
inreverseorderinwhichthequantapasstheseelements[98,91]. |
21 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.