prompt stringlengths 22 39.2k | prompt_id stringlengths 64 64 | chosen listlengths 2 2 | rejected listlengths 2 2 | messages listlengths 2 2 | score_chosen float64 5.19 10 | score_rejected float64 0 10 | other_info dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Do you live comfortably as a professor in a big city? Hi all! As in the title, I am curious if it is possible to live comfortably as a professor in a big city, i.e. say one with a 500k+ population. By 'comfortably', I roughly mean being able to buy a (small) house, not be frugal on groceries, eat out 1-2 times a week, and travel 1-2 times a year (domestically). I know an Econ Phd student who has just accepted an assistant professor position with 110K a year in Boston and he said he is really worried about living there with such a salary (maybe this is a 9-month salary). From my search, I also know a few math/stats professors from the Bay area earning around 90-95K, which I believe is not very high given the crazy cost of living there. I know this is a very complicated question since it depends a lot on the specific city, field, institution type (private/public, R1/R2, teaching, etc.), and also the spouse, so I guess I just want to know some perspectives. I am in math/stats if you are curious. In general, I want to see if one can live comfortably as a professor or not, so even if you are not living in a big city, you can also share your stories (I guess expensive college towns like Santa Barbara can be interesting case studies). Thank you so much. | e74e869360bc8b1b02f09e3418cc2d4a10ad7fef296ce88db4b68508e41b77d8 | [
{
"content": "Do you live comfortably as a professor in a big city? Hi all! As in the title, I am curious if it is possible to live comfortably as a professor in a big city, i.e. say one with a 500k+ population. By 'comfortably', I roughly mean being able to buy a (small) house, not be frugal on groceries, eat ... | [
{
"content": "Do you live comfortably as a professor in a big city? Hi all! As in the title, I am curious if it is possible to live comfortably as a professor in a big city, i.e. say one with a 500k+ population. By 'comfortably', I roughly mean being able to buy a (small) house, not be frugal on groceries, eat ... | [
{
"content": "Do you live comfortably as a professor in a big city? Hi all! As in the title, I am curious if it is possible to live comfortably as a professor in a big city, i.e. say one with a 500k+ population. By 'comfortably', I roughly mean being able to buy a (small) house, not be frugal on groceries, eat ... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zt2eym",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 26281,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
Do you live comfortably as a professor in a big city? Hi all! As in the title, I am curious if it is possible to live comfortably as a professor in a big city, i.e. say one with a 500k+ population. By 'comfortably', I roughly mean being able to buy a (small) house, not be frugal on groceries, eat out 1-2 times a week, and travel 1-2 times a year (domestically). I know an Econ Phd student who has just accepted an assistant professor position with 110K a year in Boston and he said he is really worried about living there with such a salary (maybe this is a 9-month salary). From my search, I also know a few math/stats professors from the Bay area earning around 90-95K, which I believe is not very high given the crazy cost of living there. I know this is a very complicated question since it depends a lot on the specific city, field, institution type (private/public, R1/R2, teaching, etc.), and also the spouse, so I guess I just want to know some perspectives. I am in math/stats if you are curious. In general, I want to see if one can live comfortably as a professor or not, so even if you are not living in a big city, you can also share your stories (I guess expensive college towns like Santa Barbara can be interesting case studies). Thank you so much. | e74e869360bc8b1b02f09e3418cc2d4a10ad7fef296ce88db4b68508e41b77d8 | [
{
"content": "Do you live comfortably as a professor in a big city? Hi all! As in the title, I am curious if it is possible to live comfortably as a professor in a big city, i.e. say one with a 500k+ population. By 'comfortably', I roughly mean being able to buy a (small) house, not be frugal on groceries, eat ... | [
{
"content": "Do you live comfortably as a professor in a big city? Hi all! As in the title, I am curious if it is possible to live comfortably as a professor in a big city, i.e. say one with a 500k+ population. By 'comfortably', I roughly mean being able to buy a (small) house, not be frugal on groceries, eat ... | [
{
"content": "Do you live comfortably as a professor in a big city? Hi all! As in the title, I am curious if it is possible to live comfortably as a professor in a big city, i.e. say one with a 500k+ population. By 'comfortably', I roughly mean being able to buy a (small) house, not be frugal on groceries, eat ... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zt2eym",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 20323,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
Do you live comfortably as a professor in a big city? Hi all! As in the title, I am curious if it is possible to live comfortably as a professor in a big city, i.e. say one with a 500k+ population. By 'comfortably', I roughly mean being able to buy a (small) house, not be frugal on groceries, eat out 1-2 times a week, and travel 1-2 times a year (domestically). I know an Econ Phd student who has just accepted an assistant professor position with 110K a year in Boston and he said he is really worried about living there with such a salary (maybe this is a 9-month salary). From my search, I also know a few math/stats professors from the Bay area earning around 90-95K, which I believe is not very high given the crazy cost of living there. I know this is a very complicated question since it depends a lot on the specific city, field, institution type (private/public, R1/R2, teaching, etc.), and also the spouse, so I guess I just want to know some perspectives. I am in math/stats if you are curious. In general, I want to see if one can live comfortably as a professor or not, so even if you are not living in a big city, you can also share your stories (I guess expensive college towns like Santa Barbara can be interesting case studies). Thank you so much. | e74e869360bc8b1b02f09e3418cc2d4a10ad7fef296ce88db4b68508e41b77d8 | [
{
"content": "Do you live comfortably as a professor in a big city? Hi all! As in the title, I am curious if it is possible to live comfortably as a professor in a big city, i.e. say one with a 500k+ population. By 'comfortably', I roughly mean being able to buy a (small) house, not be frugal on groceries, eat ... | [
{
"content": "Do you live comfortably as a professor in a big city? Hi all! As in the title, I am curious if it is possible to live comfortably as a professor in a big city, i.e. say one with a 500k+ population. By 'comfortably', I roughly mean being able to buy a (small) house, not be frugal on groceries, eat ... | [
{
"content": "Do you live comfortably as a professor in a big city? Hi all! As in the title, I am curious if it is possible to live comfortably as a professor in a big city, i.e. say one with a 500k+ population. By 'comfortably', I roughly mean being able to buy a (small) house, not be frugal on groceries, eat ... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zt2eym",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 9880,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputable and the publication usually gets released 2 months after the conference. Should I list it in an application form and/or CV even though it will not be online for another 2 months? Thanks for reading. | b267c51ad06908ca1d019112389999db04725349e36596dddad10037bba0da24 | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | 6.089744 | 5.200855 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xbg0bl",
"raw_score_chosen": 17,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.8888888889,
"raw_score_rejected": 9,
"seconds_difference": 1282,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputable and the publication usually gets released 2 months after the conference. Should I list it in an application form and/or CV even though it will not be online for another 2 months? Thanks for reading. | b267c51ad06908ca1d019112389999db04725349e36596dddad10037bba0da24 | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | 6.089744 | 4.661172 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xbg0bl",
"raw_score_chosen": 17,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.4285714286,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 1421,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputable and the publication usually gets released 2 months after the conference. Should I list it in an application form and/or CV even though it will not be online for another 2 months? Thanks for reading. | b267c51ad06908ca1d019112389999db04725349e36596dddad10037bba0da24 | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | 6.089744 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xbg0bl",
"raw_score_chosen": 17,
"raw_score_ratio": 8.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 1744,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputable and the publication usually gets released 2 months after the conference. Should I list it in an application form and/or CV even though it will not be online for another 2 months? Thanks for reading. | b267c51ad06908ca1d019112389999db04725349e36596dddad10037bba0da24 | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | 5.897436 | 5.34188 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xbg0bl",
"raw_score_chosen": 14,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5555555556,
"raw_score_rejected": 9,
"seconds_difference": 3350,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputable and the publication usually gets released 2 months after the conference. Should I list it in an application form and/or CV even though it will not be online for another 2 months? Thanks for reading. | b267c51ad06908ca1d019112389999db04725349e36596dddad10037bba0da24 | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | 5.897436 | 4.897436 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xbg0bl",
"raw_score_chosen": 14,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 3489,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputable and the publication usually gets released 2 months after the conference. Should I list it in an application form and/or CV even though it will not be online for another 2 months? Thanks for reading. | b267c51ad06908ca1d019112389999db04725349e36596dddad10037bba0da24 | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | 5.897436 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xbg0bl",
"raw_score_chosen": 14,
"raw_score_ratio": 7,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 3812,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputable and the publication usually gets released 2 months after the conference. Should I list it in an application form and/or CV even though it will not be online for another 2 months? Thanks for reading. | b267c51ad06908ca1d019112389999db04725349e36596dddad10037bba0da24 | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | 5.576923 | 5.291209 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xbg0bl",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.2857142857,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 139,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputable and the publication usually gets released 2 months after the conference. Should I list it in an application form and/or CV even though it will not be online for another 2 months? Thanks for reading. | b267c51ad06908ca1d019112389999db04725349e36596dddad10037bba0da24 | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | 5.576923 | 2.076923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xbg0bl",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 4.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 462,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputable and the publication usually gets released 2 months after the conference. Should I list it in an application form and/or CV even though it will not be online for another 2 months? Thanks for reading. | b267c51ad06908ca1d019112389999db04725349e36596dddad10037bba0da24 | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | 5.576923 | 5.291209 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xbg0bl",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.2857142857,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 11658,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputable and the publication usually gets released 2 months after the conference. Should I list it in an application form and/or CV even though it will not be online for another 2 months? Thanks for reading. | b267c51ad06908ca1d019112389999db04725349e36596dddad10037bba0da24 | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | 5.576923 | 2.076923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xbg0bl",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 4.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 11981,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputable and the publication usually gets released 2 months after the conference. Should I list it in an application form and/or CV even though it will not be online for another 2 months? Thanks for reading. | b267c51ad06908ca1d019112389999db04725349e36596dddad10037bba0da24 | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | [
{
"content": "In support of a PhD application would it be OK to list a conference publication even though I will have to wait 2 months for the accompanying journal to be published? The paper was accepted, the conference is over and I presented the paper. This annual conference is in its 20th year, it is reputab... | 5.448718 | 2.948718 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xbg0bl",
"raw_score_chosen": 7,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 323,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 10 | 9.961039 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 160,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.038961039,
"raw_score_rejected": 154,
"seconds_difference": 452,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 10 | 5.608696 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 124,
"raw_score_ratio": 5.3913043478,
"raw_score_rejected": 23,
"seconds_difference": 13294,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 10 | 4.111111 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 124,
"raw_score_ratio": 6.8888888889,
"raw_score_rejected": 18,
"seconds_difference": 11040,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 10 | 3.705882 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 124,
"raw_score_ratio": 7.2941176471,
"raw_score_rejected": 17,
"seconds_difference": 18755,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 10 | 0.666667 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 124,
"raw_score_ratio": 10.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 12,
"seconds_difference": 5871,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 10 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 124,
"raw_score_ratio": 12.4,
"raw_score_rejected": 10,
"seconds_difference": 9106,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 10 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 124,
"raw_score_ratio": 41.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 13503,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 10 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 124,
"raw_score_ratio": 41.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 11023,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 10 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 124,
"raw_score_ratio": 41.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 6524,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 6.474359 | 6.121418 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 23,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.3529411765,
"raw_score_rejected": 17,
"seconds_difference": 5461,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 6.474359 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 23,
"raw_score_ratio": 7.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 209,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 6.153846 | 6.095023 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 18,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.0588235294,
"raw_score_rejected": 17,
"seconds_difference": 7715,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 6.153846 | 1.153846 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 18,
"raw_score_ratio": 6,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 2463,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 5.769231 | 5.569231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.2,
"raw_score_rejected": 10,
"seconds_difference": 3235,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 5.769231 | 2.769231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 7632,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 5.769231 | 2.769231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 5152,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 5.769231 | 2.769231 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 12,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 653,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 5.641026 | 3.307692 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 10,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 4397,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 5.641026 | 3.307692 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 10,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 1917,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 5.320513 | 4.653846 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 37759,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 5.320513 | 4.653846 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 35279,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 5.320513 | 4.653846 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 30780,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 5.320513 | 3.820513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 16965,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia to have 'new blood' - young smart people instead of saying to them 'hey, you have worked incredibly hard but go find a job somewhere outside of academia'? | c3eeae8f312714de788efc8adeda6261e4b23385e284dbf3ee33028f66df73f5 | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | [
{
"content": "Hello guys. I have seen a lot of people in this sub mention that phd graduates have a very low probability to get a permanent job on academia. Is this an accurate fact, about both on humanities and natural sciences? If it is true, then isn't it a problem of academia? Isn't it better for academia t... | 5.320513 | 3.820513 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "uwzbsr",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 2273,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.8
} |
Why do I keep failing in my interviews? I am a master's degree student applying for PhD positions for 2 months. I had 4 interviews but I wasn't successful in any of them. During the interviews, I talk about my past research experiences, the techniques I've learned, and I specifically talk about "what did I gain during my internships" for example, an internatiol research experience, working in an multidisciplinary subject etc. I also read about their research topic before the interview and I talk about it too. A few professors underlined the fact that I do not have any experience related to their specific subject, and some of them asked since I am a non-eu citizen would it be difficult for me to get visa. ​ After all my interviews, I felt like I did a good job, talked about myself clearly and asked them some questions too. But I failed 4 interviews so obviously I wasn't good enough. What could I do to get better? | 9ea9e0f96868e5d3f01a4d7bda6ff0d47e5871b4dea458c275e16c81ad60bf1e | [
{
"content": "Why do I keep failing in my interviews? I am a master's degree student applying for PhD positions for 2 months. I had 4 interviews but I wasn't successful in any of them. During the interviews, I talk about my past research experiences, the techniques I've learned, and I specifically talk about \"... | [
{
"content": "Why do I keep failing in my interviews? I am a master's degree student applying for PhD positions for 2 months. I had 4 interviews but I wasn't successful in any of them. During the interviews, I talk about my past research experiences, the techniques I've learned, and I specifically talk about \"... | [
{
"content": "Why do I keep failing in my interviews? I am a master's degree student applying for PhD positions for 2 months. I had 4 interviews but I wasn't successful in any of them. During the interviews, I talk about my past research experiences, the techniques I've learned, and I specifically talk about \"... | 9.358974 | 6.108974 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zqm19j",
"raw_score_chosen": 68,
"raw_score_ratio": 4.25,
"raw_score_rejected": 16,
"seconds_difference": 1750,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
Why do I keep failing in my interviews? I am a master's degree student applying for PhD positions for 2 months. I had 4 interviews but I wasn't successful in any of them. During the interviews, I talk about my past research experiences, the techniques I've learned, and I specifically talk about "what did I gain during my internships" for example, an internatiol research experience, working in an multidisciplinary subject etc. I also read about their research topic before the interview and I talk about it too. A few professors underlined the fact that I do not have any experience related to their specific subject, and some of them asked since I am a non-eu citizen would it be difficult for me to get visa. ​ After all my interviews, I felt like I did a good job, talked about myself clearly and asked them some questions too. But I failed 4 interviews so obviously I wasn't good enough. What could I do to get better? | 9ea9e0f96868e5d3f01a4d7bda6ff0d47e5871b4dea458c275e16c81ad60bf1e | [
{
"content": "Why do I keep failing in my interviews? I am a master's degree student applying for PhD positions for 2 months. I had 4 interviews but I wasn't successful in any of them. During the interviews, I talk about my past research experiences, the techniques I've learned, and I specifically talk about \"... | [
{
"content": "Why do I keep failing in my interviews? I am a master's degree student applying for PhD positions for 2 months. I had 4 interviews but I wasn't successful in any of them. During the interviews, I talk about my past research experiences, the techniques I've learned, and I specifically talk about \"... | [
{
"content": "Why do I keep failing in my interviews? I am a master's degree student applying for PhD positions for 2 months. I had 4 interviews but I wasn't successful in any of them. During the interviews, I talk about my past research experiences, the techniques I've learned, and I specifically talk about \"... | 6.987179 | 6.049679 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zqm19j",
"raw_score_chosen": 31,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.9375,
"raw_score_rejected": 16,
"seconds_difference": 3017,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
Why do I keep failing in my interviews? I am a master's degree student applying for PhD positions for 2 months. I had 4 interviews but I wasn't successful in any of them. During the interviews, I talk about my past research experiences, the techniques I've learned, and I specifically talk about "what did I gain during my internships" for example, an internatiol research experience, working in an multidisciplinary subject etc. I also read about their research topic before the interview and I talk about it too. A few professors underlined the fact that I do not have any experience related to their specific subject, and some of them asked since I am a non-eu citizen would it be difficult for me to get visa. ​ After all my interviews, I felt like I did a good job, talked about myself clearly and asked them some questions too. But I failed 4 interviews so obviously I wasn't good enough. What could I do to get better? | 9ea9e0f96868e5d3f01a4d7bda6ff0d47e5871b4dea458c275e16c81ad60bf1e | [
{
"content": "Why do I keep failing in my interviews? I am a master's degree student applying for PhD positions for 2 months. I had 4 interviews but I wasn't successful in any of them. During the interviews, I talk about my past research experiences, the techniques I've learned, and I specifically talk about \"... | [
{
"content": "Why do I keep failing in my interviews? I am a master's degree student applying for PhD positions for 2 months. I had 4 interviews but I wasn't successful in any of them. During the interviews, I talk about my past research experiences, the techniques I've learned, and I specifically talk about \"... | [
{
"content": "Why do I keep failing in my interviews? I am a master's degree student applying for PhD positions for 2 months. I had 4 interviews but I wasn't successful in any of them. During the interviews, I talk about my past research experiences, the techniques I've learned, and I specifically talk about \"... | 5.25641 | 4.25641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zqm19j",
"raw_score_chosen": 4,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 8907,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.98
} |
Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). I cannot find the person (whose work I want to read) anywhere. Its just a last name and listing their school has not pointed me to their work. I don't know what else I can do. For anyone curious, it's this: S. Geurts, “Peripheral Play,” Utrecht School of the Arts, Hilversum, 2012. | 680a270924de803a1674a675eab2dce1ef16c687a2f8f4dea582f5b612b073a6 | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | 7.115385 | 1.515385 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "rs2hgi",
"raw_score_chosen": 33,
"raw_score_ratio": 6.6,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 355,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). I cannot find the person (whose work I want to read) anywhere. Its just a last name and listing their school has not pointed me to their work. I don't know what else I can do. For anyone curious, it's this: S. Geurts, “Peripheral Play,” Utrecht School of the Arts, Hilversum, 2012. | 680a270924de803a1674a675eab2dce1ef16c687a2f8f4dea582f5b612b073a6 | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | 6.025641 | 3.825641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "rs2hgi",
"raw_score_chosen": 16,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.2,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 741,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). I cannot find the person (whose work I want to read) anywhere. Its just a last name and listing their school has not pointed me to their work. I don't know what else I can do. For anyone curious, it's this: S. Geurts, “Peripheral Play,” Utrecht School of the Arts, Hilversum, 2012. | 680a270924de803a1674a675eab2dce1ef16c687a2f8f4dea582f5b612b073a6 | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | 5.576923 | 5.451923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "rs2hgi",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.125,
"raw_score_rejected": 8,
"seconds_difference": 243,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). I cannot find the person (whose work I want to read) anywhere. Its just a last name and listing their school has not pointed me to their work. I don't know what else I can do. For anyone curious, it's this: S. Geurts, “Peripheral Play,” Utrecht School of the Arts, Hilversum, 2012. | 680a270924de803a1674a675eab2dce1ef16c687a2f8f4dea582f5b612b073a6 | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | 5.576923 | 4.776923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "rs2hgi",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.8,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 1337,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). I cannot find the person (whose work I want to read) anywhere. Its just a last name and listing their school has not pointed me to their work. I don't know what else I can do. For anyone curious, it's this: S. Geurts, “Peripheral Play,” Utrecht School of the Arts, Hilversum, 2012. | 680a270924de803a1674a675eab2dce1ef16c687a2f8f4dea582f5b612b073a6 | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | [
{
"content": "Is it okay to contact authors and politely ask them to forward the source for a citation mentioned in their paper? I have a citation that I am looking to read. However, I have tried various approaches to look up the source but they only show up on the authors' papers (and their PhD dissertation). ... | 5.512821 | 4.912821 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "rs2hgi",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 1094,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.97
} |
I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay with that. However, this lecturer is using a FREE online course to teach a year-3 specialization course. Is it right for me to freak out about this? | 04ba621a089f7eb87e51be2d7a3d3af5fed5bc208d52dfa5b4fdfefc34d395cd | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | 10 | 9.75 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tu3ya2",
"raw_score_chosen": 110,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.25,
"raw_score_rejected": 88,
"seconds_difference": 351,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.64
} |
I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay with that. However, this lecturer is using a FREE online course to teach a year-3 specialization course. Is it right for me to freak out about this? | 04ba621a089f7eb87e51be2d7a3d3af5fed5bc208d52dfa5b4fdfefc34d395cd | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | 10 | 9.533333 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tu3ya2",
"raw_score_chosen": 110,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.4666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 75,
"seconds_difference": 4761,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.64
} |
I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay with that. However, this lecturer is using a FREE online course to teach a year-3 specialization course. Is it right for me to freak out about this? | 04ba621a089f7eb87e51be2d7a3d3af5fed5bc208d52dfa5b4fdfefc34d395cd | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | 10 | 9.840909 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tu3ya2",
"raw_score_chosen": 102,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.1590909091,
"raw_score_rejected": 88,
"seconds_difference": 1453,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.64
} |
I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay with that. However, this lecturer is using a FREE online course to teach a year-3 specialization course. Is it right for me to freak out about this? | 04ba621a089f7eb87e51be2d7a3d3af5fed5bc208d52dfa5b4fdfefc34d395cd | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | 10 | 9.64 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tu3ya2",
"raw_score_chosen": 102,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.36,
"raw_score_rejected": 75,
"seconds_difference": 5863,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.64
} |
I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay with that. However, this lecturer is using a FREE online course to teach a year-3 specialization course. Is it right for me to freak out about this? | 04ba621a089f7eb87e51be2d7a3d3af5fed5bc208d52dfa5b4fdfefc34d395cd | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | 10 | 9.826667 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tu3ya2",
"raw_score_chosen": 88,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.1733333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 75,
"seconds_difference": 4410,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.64
} |
I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay with that. However, this lecturer is using a FREE online course to teach a year-3 specialization course. Is it right for me to freak out about this? | 04ba621a089f7eb87e51be2d7a3d3af5fed5bc208d52dfa5b4fdfefc34d395cd | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | 6.282051 | 6.105581 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tu3ya2",
"raw_score_chosen": 20,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.1764705882,
"raw_score_rejected": 17,
"seconds_difference": 1784,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.64
} |
I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay with that. However, this lecturer is using a FREE online course to teach a year-3 specialization course. Is it right for me to freak out about this? | 04ba621a089f7eb87e51be2d7a3d3af5fed5bc208d52dfa5b4fdfefc34d395cd | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | 6.282051 | 5.615385 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tu3ya2",
"raw_score_chosen": 20,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 12,
"seconds_difference": 27586,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.64
} |
I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay with that. However, this lecturer is using a FREE online course to teach a year-3 specialization course. Is it right for me to freak out about this? | 04ba621a089f7eb87e51be2d7a3d3af5fed5bc208d52dfa5b4fdfefc34d395cd | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | 6.089744 | 5.673077 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tu3ya2",
"raw_score_chosen": 17,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.4166666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 12,
"seconds_difference": 25802,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.64
} |
I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay with that. However, this lecturer is using a FREE online course to teach a year-3 specialization course. Is it right for me to freak out about this? | 04ba621a089f7eb87e51be2d7a3d3af5fed5bc208d52dfa5b4fdfefc34d395cd | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | [
{
"content": "I recently found out my lecturer has been using a free coursera course to teach a course, is that okay? I'm well aware this question has been asked many times before, but none of them specifically mention coursera courses. I'm aware most textbooks will provide teaching slides, and I'm really okay ... | 5.576923 | 5.451923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "tu3ya2",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.125,
"raw_score_rejected": 8,
"seconds_difference": 2030,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.64
} |
I've been accepted to present a paper at an online conference in 3 weeks, but the organizers are not answering my questions! I'm very excited to be presenting my first paper at an International Conference in my field. I have 20 mins to give an online presentation of my PhD research. My big question is - do I need to prepare slides, or will this be a video based conference? I guess only the organizers can answer that question, but I think everyone is still on holiday. What is the general trend these days? Should I plan for slides? That would suit me better than a direct feed of my talking face. Lol. Any suggestions? | 67a22b50d03e199472df799b8ea29a6f5c1ba654126406bd4b6c42812051e581 | [
{
"content": "I've been accepted to present a paper at an online conference in 3 weeks, but the organizers are not answering my questions! I'm very excited to be presenting my first paper at an International Conference in my field. I have 20 mins to give an online presentation of my PhD research. My big questio... | [
{
"content": "I've been accepted to present a paper at an online conference in 3 weeks, but the organizers are not answering my questions! I'm very excited to be presenting my first paper at an International Conference in my field. I have 20 mins to give an online presentation of my PhD research. My big questio... | [
{
"content": "I've been accepted to present a paper at an online conference in 3 weeks, but the organizers are not answering my questions! I'm very excited to be presenting my first paper at an International Conference in my field. I have 20 mins to give an online presentation of my PhD research. My big questio... | 6.923077 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "s2slhf",
"raw_score_chosen": 30,
"raw_score_ratio": 10,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 7728,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.9
} |
I've been accepted to present a paper at an online conference in 3 weeks, but the organizers are not answering my questions! I'm very excited to be presenting my first paper at an International Conference in my field. I have 20 mins to give an online presentation of my PhD research. My big question is - do I need to prepare slides, or will this be a video based conference? I guess only the organizers can answer that question, but I think everyone is still on holiday. What is the general trend these days? Should I plan for slides? That would suit me better than a direct feed of my talking face. Lol. Any suggestions? | 67a22b50d03e199472df799b8ea29a6f5c1ba654126406bd4b6c42812051e581 | [
{
"content": "I've been accepted to present a paper at an online conference in 3 weeks, but the organizers are not answering my questions! I'm very excited to be presenting my first paper at an International Conference in my field. I have 20 mins to give an online presentation of my PhD research. My big questio... | [
{
"content": "I've been accepted to present a paper at an online conference in 3 weeks, but the organizers are not answering my questions! I'm very excited to be presenting my first paper at an International Conference in my field. I have 20 mins to give an online presentation of my PhD research. My big questio... | [
{
"content": "I've been accepted to present a paper at an online conference in 3 weeks, but the organizers are not answering my questions! I'm very excited to be presenting my first paper at an International Conference in my field. I have 20 mins to give an online presentation of my PhD research. My big questio... | 5.320513 | 4.653846 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "s2slhf",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 8668,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.9
} |
An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal was a brand new one, one of the open source ones that claim to focus on rapid publication, provided that the research is sound while not making judgments on future significance on the paper (no IF yet). Therefore I accepted to review. ​ I tried not to be harsh in the review, as the journal is small and the authors were from a very small non -reasearch focused team, like it was their first paper ever. But the paper was completely wrong, in all aspects. English was terrible, structure was surreal and, anyway, what they tried to do was completely wrong (they misunderstood the basics of what they were doing work). Just to give you an example, the abstract was written like they were telling a story, and it included sentences like "we used script.sh to generate data file processedData.bin" (where script.sh , it appears, is a script they developed and nowhere they stated what it was doing and how). I was not very harsh in the review but I was very clear in the "comments to the editor". ​ Despite this clear, huge problems, I was informed that the paper was accepted pending a "major" revision, but what they asked them was very simple. I'm pretty puzzled by this behavior. Should I start thinking that this reputable editor is behaving like a predatory one? | 8a2efb92b0f06ce4538137d30624c6f4cd7f041f6f6ed51dc395a0988117d2a6 | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | 10 | 8.55 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "bzpg9b",
"raw_score_chosen": 98,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.45,
"raw_score_rejected": 40,
"seconds_difference": 8025,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal was a brand new one, one of the open source ones that claim to focus on rapid publication, provided that the research is sound while not making judgments on future significance on the paper (no IF yet). Therefore I accepted to review. ​ I tried not to be harsh in the review, as the journal is small and the authors were from a very small non -reasearch focused team, like it was their first paper ever. But the paper was completely wrong, in all aspects. English was terrible, structure was surreal and, anyway, what they tried to do was completely wrong (they misunderstood the basics of what they were doing work). Just to give you an example, the abstract was written like they were telling a story, and it included sentences like "we used script.sh to generate data file processedData.bin" (where script.sh , it appears, is a script they developed and nowhere they stated what it was doing and how). I was not very harsh in the review but I was very clear in the "comments to the editor". ​ Despite this clear, huge problems, I was informed that the paper was accepted pending a "major" revision, but what they asked them was very simple. I'm pretty puzzled by this behavior. Should I start thinking that this reputable editor is behaving like a predatory one? | 8a2efb92b0f06ce4538137d30624c6f4cd7f041f6f6ed51dc395a0988117d2a6 | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | 10 | 4.875 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "bzpg9b",
"raw_score_chosen": 98,
"raw_score_ratio": 6.125,
"raw_score_rejected": 16,
"seconds_difference": 1159,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal was a brand new one, one of the open source ones that claim to focus on rapid publication, provided that the research is sound while not making judgments on future significance on the paper (no IF yet). Therefore I accepted to review. ​ I tried not to be harsh in the review, as the journal is small and the authors were from a very small non -reasearch focused team, like it was their first paper ever. But the paper was completely wrong, in all aspects. English was terrible, structure was surreal and, anyway, what they tried to do was completely wrong (they misunderstood the basics of what they were doing work). Just to give you an example, the abstract was written like they were telling a story, and it included sentences like "we used script.sh to generate data file processedData.bin" (where script.sh , it appears, is a script they developed and nowhere they stated what it was doing and how). I was not very harsh in the review but I was very clear in the "comments to the editor". ​ Despite this clear, huge problems, I was informed that the paper was accepted pending a "major" revision, but what they asked them was very simple. I'm pretty puzzled by this behavior. Should I start thinking that this reputable editor is behaving like a predatory one? | 8a2efb92b0f06ce4538137d30624c6f4cd7f041f6f6ed51dc395a0988117d2a6 | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | 10 | 3.461538 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "bzpg9b",
"raw_score_chosen": 98,
"raw_score_ratio": 7.5384615385,
"raw_score_rejected": 13,
"seconds_difference": 7560,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal was a brand new one, one of the open source ones that claim to focus on rapid publication, provided that the research is sound while not making judgments on future significance on the paper (no IF yet). Therefore I accepted to review. ​ I tried not to be harsh in the review, as the journal is small and the authors were from a very small non -reasearch focused team, like it was their first paper ever. But the paper was completely wrong, in all aspects. English was terrible, structure was surreal and, anyway, what they tried to do was completely wrong (they misunderstood the basics of what they were doing work). Just to give you an example, the abstract was written like they were telling a story, and it included sentences like "we used script.sh to generate data file processedData.bin" (where script.sh , it appears, is a script they developed and nowhere they stated what it was doing and how). I was not very harsh in the review but I was very clear in the "comments to the editor". ​ Despite this clear, huge problems, I was informed that the paper was accepted pending a "major" revision, but what they asked them was very simple. I'm pretty puzzled by this behavior. Should I start thinking that this reputable editor is behaving like a predatory one? | 8a2efb92b0f06ce4538137d30624c6f4cd7f041f6f6ed51dc395a0988117d2a6 | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | 10 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "bzpg9b",
"raw_score_chosen": 98,
"raw_score_ratio": 19.6,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 6680,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal was a brand new one, one of the open source ones that claim to focus on rapid publication, provided that the research is sound while not making judgments on future significance on the paper (no IF yet). Therefore I accepted to review. ​ I tried not to be harsh in the review, as the journal is small and the authors were from a very small non -reasearch focused team, like it was their first paper ever. But the paper was completely wrong, in all aspects. English was terrible, structure was surreal and, anyway, what they tried to do was completely wrong (they misunderstood the basics of what they were doing work). Just to give you an example, the abstract was written like they were telling a story, and it included sentences like "we used script.sh to generate data file processedData.bin" (where script.sh , it appears, is a script they developed and nowhere they stated what it was doing and how). I was not very harsh in the review but I was very clear in the "comments to the editor". ​ Despite this clear, huge problems, I was informed that the paper was accepted pending a "major" revision, but what they asked them was very simple. I'm pretty puzzled by this behavior. Should I start thinking that this reputable editor is behaving like a predatory one? | 8a2efb92b0f06ce4538137d30624c6f4cd7f041f6f6ed51dc395a0988117d2a6 | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | 10 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "bzpg9b",
"raw_score_chosen": 98,
"raw_score_ratio": 32.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 9008,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal was a brand new one, one of the open source ones that claim to focus on rapid publication, provided that the research is sound while not making judgments on future significance on the paper (no IF yet). Therefore I accepted to review. ​ I tried not to be harsh in the review, as the journal is small and the authors were from a very small non -reasearch focused team, like it was their first paper ever. But the paper was completely wrong, in all aspects. English was terrible, structure was surreal and, anyway, what they tried to do was completely wrong (they misunderstood the basics of what they were doing work). Just to give you an example, the abstract was written like they were telling a story, and it included sentences like "we used script.sh to generate data file processedData.bin" (where script.sh , it appears, is a script they developed and nowhere they stated what it was doing and how). I was not very harsh in the review but I was very clear in the "comments to the editor". ​ Despite this clear, huge problems, I was informed that the paper was accepted pending a "major" revision, but what they asked them was very simple. I'm pretty puzzled by this behavior. Should I start thinking that this reputable editor is behaving like a predatory one? | 8a2efb92b0f06ce4538137d30624c6f4cd7f041f6f6ed51dc395a0988117d2a6 | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | 7.564103 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "bzpg9b",
"raw_score_chosen": 40,
"raw_score_ratio": 13.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 983,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal was a brand new one, one of the open source ones that claim to focus on rapid publication, provided that the research is sound while not making judgments on future significance on the paper (no IF yet). Therefore I accepted to review. ​ I tried not to be harsh in the review, as the journal is small and the authors were from a very small non -reasearch focused team, like it was their first paper ever. But the paper was completely wrong, in all aspects. English was terrible, structure was surreal and, anyway, what they tried to do was completely wrong (they misunderstood the basics of what they were doing work). Just to give you an example, the abstract was written like they were telling a story, and it included sentences like "we used script.sh to generate data file processedData.bin" (where script.sh , it appears, is a script they developed and nowhere they stated what it was doing and how). I was not very harsh in the review but I was very clear in the "comments to the editor". ​ Despite this clear, huge problems, I was informed that the paper was accepted pending a "major" revision, but what they asked them was very simple. I'm pretty puzzled by this behavior. Should I start thinking that this reputable editor is behaving like a predatory one? | 8a2efb92b0f06ce4538137d30624c6f4cd7f041f6f6ed51dc395a0988117d2a6 | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | 6.025641 | 5.794872 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "bzpg9b",
"raw_score_chosen": 16,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.2307692308,
"raw_score_rejected": 13,
"seconds_difference": 6401,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal was a brand new one, one of the open source ones that claim to focus on rapid publication, provided that the research is sound while not making judgments on future significance on the paper (no IF yet). Therefore I accepted to review. ​ I tried not to be harsh in the review, as the journal is small and the authors were from a very small non -reasearch focused team, like it was their first paper ever. But the paper was completely wrong, in all aspects. English was terrible, structure was surreal and, anyway, what they tried to do was completely wrong (they misunderstood the basics of what they were doing work). Just to give you an example, the abstract was written like they were telling a story, and it included sentences like "we used script.sh to generate data file processedData.bin" (where script.sh , it appears, is a script they developed and nowhere they stated what it was doing and how). I was not very harsh in the review but I was very clear in the "comments to the editor". ​ Despite this clear, huge problems, I was informed that the paper was accepted pending a "major" revision, but what they asked them was very simple. I'm pretty puzzled by this behavior. Should I start thinking that this reputable editor is behaving like a predatory one? | 8a2efb92b0f06ce4538137d30624c6f4cd7f041f6f6ed51dc395a0988117d2a6 | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | 6.025641 | 3.825641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "bzpg9b",
"raw_score_chosen": 16,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.2,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 5521,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal was a brand new one, one of the open source ones that claim to focus on rapid publication, provided that the research is sound while not making judgments on future significance on the paper (no IF yet). Therefore I accepted to review. ​ I tried not to be harsh in the review, as the journal is small and the authors were from a very small non -reasearch focused team, like it was their first paper ever. But the paper was completely wrong, in all aspects. English was terrible, structure was surreal and, anyway, what they tried to do was completely wrong (they misunderstood the basics of what they were doing work). Just to give you an example, the abstract was written like they were telling a story, and it included sentences like "we used script.sh to generate data file processedData.bin" (where script.sh , it appears, is a script they developed and nowhere they stated what it was doing and how). I was not very harsh in the review but I was very clear in the "comments to the editor". ​ Despite this clear, huge problems, I was informed that the paper was accepted pending a "major" revision, but what they asked them was very simple. I'm pretty puzzled by this behavior. Should I start thinking that this reputable editor is behaving like a predatory one? | 8a2efb92b0f06ce4538137d30624c6f4cd7f041f6f6ed51dc395a0988117d2a6 | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | 6.025641 | 1.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "bzpg9b",
"raw_score_chosen": 16,
"raw_score_ratio": 5.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 7849,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal was a brand new one, one of the open source ones that claim to focus on rapid publication, provided that the research is sound while not making judgments on future significance on the paper (no IF yet). Therefore I accepted to review. ​ I tried not to be harsh in the review, as the journal is small and the authors were from a very small non -reasearch focused team, like it was their first paper ever. But the paper was completely wrong, in all aspects. English was terrible, structure was surreal and, anyway, what they tried to do was completely wrong (they misunderstood the basics of what they were doing work). Just to give you an example, the abstract was written like they were telling a story, and it included sentences like "we used script.sh to generate data file processedData.bin" (where script.sh , it appears, is a script they developed and nowhere they stated what it was doing and how). I was not very harsh in the review but I was very clear in the "comments to the editor". ​ Despite this clear, huge problems, I was informed that the paper was accepted pending a "major" revision, but what they asked them was very simple. I'm pretty puzzled by this behavior. Should I start thinking that this reputable editor is behaving like a predatory one? | 8a2efb92b0f06ce4538137d30624c6f4cd7f041f6f6ed51dc395a0988117d2a6 | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | 5.833333 | 2.5 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "bzpg9b",
"raw_score_chosen": 13,
"raw_score_ratio": 4.3333333333,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 1448,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal was a brand new one, one of the open source ones that claim to focus on rapid publication, provided that the research is sound while not making judgments on future significance on the paper (no IF yet). Therefore I accepted to review. ​ I tried not to be harsh in the review, as the journal is small and the authors were from a very small non -reasearch focused team, like it was their first paper ever. But the paper was completely wrong, in all aspects. English was terrible, structure was surreal and, anyway, what they tried to do was completely wrong (they misunderstood the basics of what they were doing work). Just to give you an example, the abstract was written like they were telling a story, and it included sentences like "we used script.sh to generate data file processedData.bin" (where script.sh , it appears, is a script they developed and nowhere they stated what it was doing and how). I was not very harsh in the review but I was very clear in the "comments to the editor". ​ Despite this clear, huge problems, I was informed that the paper was accepted pending a "major" revision, but what they asked them was very simple. I'm pretty puzzled by this behavior. Should I start thinking that this reputable editor is behaving like a predatory one? | 8a2efb92b0f06ce4538137d30624c6f4cd7f041f6f6ed51dc395a0988117d2a6 | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | [
{
"content": "An unacceptable paper I rejected was accepted. Might this be a predatory journal? Recently I got a paper to review from an unknown journal. I researched it and I found out that the editor of this journal is a famous, big, completely legit, publisher of a scientific society. However the journal wa... | 5.320513 | 4.653846 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "bzpg9b",
"raw_score_chosen": 5,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 2328,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I received lots of comments from her and she is also kind enough to proofread the whole manuscript. But as I read the revised paper, I feel like it is not the paper that I wrote anymore and felt like I don't deserve to be its first author. My self-esteem actually sank. Now, my question is, is it normal to feel that way? What do you usually do to boost your confidence in writing, and maybe help you accept it as your own? Thanks. | 3945cc18f45b1d105bda55a16157b464f7f94d8442c3029ff4236ba5f6f921fe | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | 9.423077 | 5.823077 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zgxrws",
"raw_score_chosen": 69,
"raw_score_ratio": 4.6,
"raw_score_rejected": 15,
"seconds_difference": 672,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I received lots of comments from her and she is also kind enough to proofread the whole manuscript. But as I read the revised paper, I feel like it is not the paper that I wrote anymore and felt like I don't deserve to be its first author. My self-esteem actually sank. Now, my question is, is it normal to feel that way? What do you usually do to boost your confidence in writing, and maybe help you accept it as your own? Thanks. | 3945cc18f45b1d105bda55a16157b464f7f94d8442c3029ff4236ba5f6f921fe | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | 9.423077 | 3.523077 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zgxrws",
"raw_score_chosen": 69,
"raw_score_ratio": 6.9,
"raw_score_rejected": 10,
"seconds_difference": 3775,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I received lots of comments from her and she is also kind enough to proofread the whole manuscript. But as I read the revised paper, I feel like it is not the paper that I wrote anymore and felt like I don't deserve to be its first author. My self-esteem actually sank. Now, my question is, is it normal to feel that way? What do you usually do to boost your confidence in writing, and maybe help you accept it as your own? Thanks. | 3945cc18f45b1d105bda55a16157b464f7f94d8442c3029ff4236ba5f6f921fe | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | 9.423077 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zgxrws",
"raw_score_chosen": 69,
"raw_score_ratio": 13.8,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 333,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I received lots of comments from her and she is also kind enough to proofread the whole manuscript. But as I read the revised paper, I feel like it is not the paper that I wrote anymore and felt like I don't deserve to be its first author. My self-esteem actually sank. Now, my question is, is it normal to feel that way? What do you usually do to boost your confidence in writing, and maybe help you accept it as your own? Thanks. | 3945cc18f45b1d105bda55a16157b464f7f94d8442c3029ff4236ba5f6f921fe | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | 7.371795 | 5.905128 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zgxrws",
"raw_score_chosen": 37,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.4666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 15,
"seconds_difference": 3561,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I received lots of comments from her and she is also kind enough to proofread the whole manuscript. But as I read the revised paper, I feel like it is not the paper that I wrote anymore and felt like I don't deserve to be its first author. My self-esteem actually sank. Now, my question is, is it normal to feel that way? What do you usually do to boost your confidence in writing, and maybe help you accept it as your own? Thanks. | 3945cc18f45b1d105bda55a16157b464f7f94d8442c3029ff4236ba5f6f921fe | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | 7.371795 | 4.671795 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zgxrws",
"raw_score_chosen": 37,
"raw_score_ratio": 3.7,
"raw_score_rejected": 10,
"seconds_difference": 6664,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I received lots of comments from her and she is also kind enough to proofread the whole manuscript. But as I read the revised paper, I feel like it is not the paper that I wrote anymore and felt like I don't deserve to be its first author. My self-esteem actually sank. Now, my question is, is it normal to feel that way? What do you usually do to boost your confidence in writing, and maybe help you accept it as your own? Thanks. | 3945cc18f45b1d105bda55a16157b464f7f94d8442c3029ff4236ba5f6f921fe | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | 7.371795 | 0.971795 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zgxrws",
"raw_score_chosen": 37,
"raw_score_ratio": 7.4,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 3222,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I received lots of comments from her and she is also kind enough to proofread the whole manuscript. But as I read the revised paper, I feel like it is not the paper that I wrote anymore and felt like I don't deserve to be its first author. My self-esteem actually sank. Now, my question is, is it normal to feel that way? What do you usually do to boost your confidence in writing, and maybe help you accept it as your own? Thanks. | 3945cc18f45b1d105bda55a16157b464f7f94d8442c3029ff4236ba5f6f921fe | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | [
{
"content": "First time writing a paper for publication Hi! I am a grad school student. Me and my supervisor is planning to submit a paper for publication. This is supposed to be my first First Author paper. I wrote the first draft and asked my supervisor for her comments and feedbacks. As expected, I receiv... | 5.961538 | 5.461538 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "zgxrws",
"raw_score_chosen": 15,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 10,
"seconds_difference": 3103,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 10 | 4.45 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 131,
"raw_score_ratio": 6.55,
"raw_score_rejected": 20,
"seconds_difference": 3874,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 10 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 131,
"raw_score_ratio": 18.7142857143,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 1071,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 6.025641 | 5.794872 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 16,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.2307692308,
"raw_score_rejected": 13,
"seconds_difference": 9384,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 6.025641 | 4.739927 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 16,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.2857142857,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 18261,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 6.025641 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 16,
"raw_score_ratio": 8,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 8798,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 6.025641 | 0 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 16,
"raw_score_ratio": 8,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 8436,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 5.833333 | 4.97619 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 13,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.8571428571,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 8877,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 5.512821 | 5.369963 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.1428571429,
"raw_score_rejected": 7,
"seconds_difference": 42878,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 5.512821 | 3.846154 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.6666666667,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 8443,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 5.512821 | 2.512821 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 33415,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 5.512821 | 2.512821 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 33053,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 5.512821 | 2.512821 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 4,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 20287,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 24972,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 24610,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted. | 8e723eaa766cea02545504cd2c3efb58ba17c696645d9fb01b9c1f353a08f96f | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | [
{
"content": "If a reputable conference extends the deadline for abstract submission the day they were due, does that mean the submission rate was low and there's a higher likelihood of mine getting accepted? Title says it all. Please tell me it means mine is likely to be accepted.",
"role": "user"
},
{... | 5.192308 | 4.692308 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "xviykx",
"raw_score_chosen": 3,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.5,
"raw_score_rejected": 2,
"seconds_difference": 11844,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.94
} |
Have you ever had a paper accepted when one of the reviewers was still recommending 'reject'? I just submitted journal paper revisions a few days ago, and this morning was asked for another round of revision by the editor. There are 3 reviewers, 2 recommend accept as is at this stage and 1 recommends reject - with the latter having provided vague comments in the first round and responded again with vague comments on this round. For example: "I am just not convinced that this paper contributes anything novel. The authors have made the paper read better and included more articulate arguments for its novelty, but I simply remain unconvinced". No further elaboration on why. Just that they "remain unconvinced". That was their ONLY comment this time. Also if you're an editor, what is your perspective on this situation and advice for authors in this case? | b8249f0a265081f6c083403c0afbe8f2d219b48cd569e08d9bdc13f4c9f78547 | [
{
"content": "Have you ever had a paper accepted when one of the reviewers was still recommending 'reject'? I just submitted journal paper revisions a few days ago, and this morning was asked for another round of revision by the editor. There are 3 reviewers, 2 recommend accept as is at this stage and 1 recomme... | [
{
"content": "Have you ever had a paper accepted when one of the reviewers was still recommending 'reject'? I just submitted journal paper revisions a few days ago, and this morning was asked for another round of revision by the editor. There are 3 reviewers, 2 recommend accept as is at this stage and 1 recomme... | [
{
"content": "Have you ever had a paper accepted when one of the reviewers was still recommending 'reject'? I just submitted journal paper revisions a few days ago, and this morning was asked for another round of revision by the editor. There are 3 reviewers, 2 recommend accept as is at this stage and 1 recomme... | 6.025641 | 5.025641 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "8bj2wb",
"raw_score_chosen": 16,
"raw_score_ratio": 2,
"raw_score_rejected": 8,
"seconds_difference": 2626,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.93
} |
Have you ever had a paper accepted when one of the reviewers was still recommending 'reject'? I just submitted journal paper revisions a few days ago, and this morning was asked for another round of revision by the editor. There are 3 reviewers, 2 recommend accept as is at this stage and 1 recommends reject - with the latter having provided vague comments in the first round and responded again with vague comments on this round. For example: "I am just not convinced that this paper contributes anything novel. The authors have made the paper read better and included more articulate arguments for its novelty, but I simply remain unconvinced". No further elaboration on why. Just that they "remain unconvinced". That was their ONLY comment this time. Also if you're an editor, what is your perspective on this situation and advice for authors in this case? | b8249f0a265081f6c083403c0afbe8f2d219b48cd569e08d9bdc13f4c9f78547 | [
{
"content": "Have you ever had a paper accepted when one of the reviewers was still recommending 'reject'? I just submitted journal paper revisions a few days ago, and this morning was asked for another round of revision by the editor. There are 3 reviewers, 2 recommend accept as is at this stage and 1 recomme... | [
{
"content": "Have you ever had a paper accepted when one of the reviewers was still recommending 'reject'? I just submitted journal paper revisions a few days ago, and this morning was asked for another round of revision by the editor. There are 3 reviewers, 2 recommend accept as is at this stage and 1 recomme... | [
{
"content": "Have you ever had a paper accepted when one of the reviewers was still recommending 'reject'? I just submitted journal paper revisions a few days ago, and this morning was asked for another round of revision by the editor. There are 3 reviewers, 2 recommend accept as is at this stage and 1 recomme... | 5.512821 | 4.912821 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "8bj2wb",
"raw_score_chosen": 8,
"raw_score_ratio": 1.6,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 178,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.93
} |
What do you do when you feel like you don't know how to move forward/have a fulfilling life after graduation? Does anybody feel like their life is on hold while they are waiting to figure out their career? I know these feelings are stronger in me because of the pandemic, but I just feel like I want to move forward and can't. I just got turned down for a grant that I thought I had a good chance of getting. It looks like I'm going to be stuck where I am for another year, but I hate being here and I don't want to create any stronger roots than I already have here because the chances of me staying here long term are very low. If I go into academia, I also really need some more data to publish enough for TT jobs. I absolutely need a postdoc and can't really handle even a VAP position due to health issues that would be easier to get under control while doing research. I really, really, want to get one to my dream city while I don't have many personal obligations that could interfere with my experience there. That doesn't look like it's going to happen for the next year. I'm also at the point in my life where I'm starting to want to settle down. I've been so unsettled, moving from place to place since basically undergrad. I still want to temporarily move to my dream city, but also want to put down roots somewhere (but not where I am now). Has anybody else ever felt like this? What did you do? | e152858944e1f666ef91c5f66230f89a1b6882fb7ab45d0322a307cf34c0022f | [
{
"content": "What do you do when you feel like you don't know how to move forward/have a fulfilling life after graduation? Does anybody feel like their life is on hold while they are waiting to figure out their career? I know these feelings are stronger in me because of the pandemic, but I just feel like I wan... | [
{
"content": "What do you do when you feel like you don't know how to move forward/have a fulfilling life after graduation? Does anybody feel like their life is on hold while they are waiting to figure out their career? I know these feelings are stronger in me because of the pandemic, but I just feel like I wan... | [
{
"content": "What do you do when you feel like you don't know how to move forward/have a fulfilling life after graduation? Does anybody feel like their life is on hold while they are waiting to figure out their career? I know these feelings are stronger in me because of the pandemic, but I just feel like I wan... | 5.576923 | 3.576923 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "u35vdm",
"raw_score_chosen": 9,
"raw_score_ratio": 3,
"raw_score_rejected": 3,
"seconds_difference": 37573,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.89
} |
Would it be easier to get a place in foreign academia if you get your masters/PhD there? Hello, I am currently studying psychology and I am looking for options for working in academia abroad. Would it be easier to have an academic career in a foreign country if I got my masters/PhD there? Any help would be appreciated. | 5c567467410fff0d93c3e0f60cfadfa6e9fd8dc36f6ad5e5baa312c59596709c | [
{
"content": "Would it be easier to get a place in foreign academia if you get your masters/PhD there? Hello, I am currently studying psychology and I am looking for options for working in academia abroad. Would it be easier to have an academic career in a foreign country if I got my masters/PhD there? Any help... | [
{
"content": "Would it be easier to get a place in foreign academia if you get your masters/PhD there? Hello, I am currently studying psychology and I am looking for options for working in academia abroad. Would it be easier to have an academic career in a foreign country if I got my masters/PhD there? Any help... | [
{
"content": "Would it be easier to get a place in foreign academia if you get your masters/PhD there? Hello, I am currently studying psychology and I am looking for options for working in academia abroad. Would it be easier to have an academic career in a foreign country if I got my masters/PhD there? Any help... | 8.269231 | 6.840659 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "rvqehp",
"raw_score_chosen": 51,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.4285714286,
"raw_score_rejected": 21,
"seconds_difference": 444,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.95
} |
Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know well-renowned scientists then you are out of luck. Therefore, advanced social skills and some oiling/charisma is important. If you don't have those then even if you are the next Einstein you would probably not even get a PhD or postdoc let alone a job. Can someone confirm whether this is true and to what extent? | a2298779c15b81a997281bea4b58a3c4081a185fa6f78a50b64783f387f7391d | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | 10 | 8.473684 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "9mgofm",
"raw_score_chosen": 96,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.5263157895,
"raw_score_rejected": 38,
"seconds_difference": 328,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.91
} |
Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know well-renowned scientists then you are out of luck. Therefore, advanced social skills and some oiling/charisma is important. If you don't have those then even if you are the next Einstein you would probably not even get a PhD or postdoc let alone a job. Can someone confirm whether this is true and to what extent? | a2298779c15b81a997281bea4b58a3c4081a185fa6f78a50b64783f387f7391d | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | 7.115385 | 1.515385 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "9mgofm",
"raw_score_chosen": 33,
"raw_score_ratio": 6.6,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 771,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.91
} |
Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know well-renowned scientists then you are out of luck. Therefore, advanced social skills and some oiling/charisma is important. If you don't have those then even if you are the next Einstein you would probably not even get a PhD or postdoc let alone a job. Can someone confirm whether this is true and to what extent? | a2298779c15b81a997281bea4b58a3c4081a185fa6f78a50b64783f387f7391d | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | 6.730769 | 5.480769 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "9mgofm",
"raw_score_chosen": 27,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.25,
"raw_score_rejected": 12,
"seconds_difference": 2894,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.91
} |
Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know well-renowned scientists then you are out of luck. Therefore, advanced social skills and some oiling/charisma is important. If you don't have those then even if you are the next Einstein you would probably not even get a PhD or postdoc let alone a job. Can someone confirm whether this is true and to what extent? | a2298779c15b81a997281bea4b58a3c4081a185fa6f78a50b64783f387f7391d | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | 6.730769 | 5.030769 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "9mgofm",
"raw_score_chosen": 27,
"raw_score_ratio": 2.7,
"raw_score_rejected": 10,
"seconds_difference": 5307,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.91
} |
Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know well-renowned scientists then you are out of luck. Therefore, advanced social skills and some oiling/charisma is important. If you don't have those then even if you are the next Einstein you would probably not even get a PhD or postdoc let alone a job. Can someone confirm whether this is true and to what extent? | a2298779c15b81a997281bea4b58a3c4081a185fa6f78a50b64783f387f7391d | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | 6.730769 | 2.330769 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "9mgofm",
"raw_score_chosen": 27,
"raw_score_ratio": 5.4,
"raw_score_rejected": 5,
"seconds_difference": 8652,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.91
} |
Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know well-renowned scientists then you are out of luck. Therefore, advanced social skills and some oiling/charisma is important. If you don't have those then even if you are the next Einstein you would probably not even get a PhD or postdoc let alone a job. Can someone confirm whether this is true and to what extent? | a2298779c15b81a997281bea4b58a3c4081a185fa6f78a50b64783f387f7391d | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | [
{
"content": "Is it true that if you can't network and don't have social skills than it is unlikely you will get a postdoc or a job even if you are a genius in your field? So I have heard from people in Academia that networking is vital to getting a job or postdoc in Academia or even a PhD. If you do not know w... | 6.730769 | 0.980769 | {
"domain": "askacademia_train",
"post_id": "9mgofm",
"raw_score_chosen": 27,
"raw_score_ratio": 6.75,
"raw_score_rejected": 4,
"seconds_difference": 5794,
"source": "stanfordnlp/SHP",
"upvote_ratio": 0.91
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.