text
stringlengths
11
654
[1577.22 --> 1578.38] a 10 gigabit
[1578.38 --> 1578.86] per second
[1578.86 --> 1579.94] Ethernet connection
[1579.94 --> 1581.00] between,
[1581.42 --> 1582.06] not only
[1582.06 --> 1582.52] from Mac
[1582.52 --> 1582.98] to Mac,
[1583.16 --> 1583.82] but between
[1583.82 --> 1584.62] a Mac
[1584.62 --> 1585.72] and a PC.
[1586.38 --> 1586.54] So,
[1586.66 --> 1587.34] now,
[1587.70 --> 1588.12] your Mac
[1588.12 --> 1588.84] Pro with
[1588.84 --> 1589.58] its six
[1589.58 --> 1590.26] Thunderbolt 2
[1590.26 --> 1590.76] connections
[1590.76 --> 1591.68] and,
[1591.68 --> 1592.34] you know,
[1592.40 --> 1592.92] Gigabyte for
[1592.92 --> 1593.32] example,
[1593.64 --> 1594.32] so your PC
[1594.32 --> 1594.74] motherboard
[1595.60 --> 1596.62] dual Thunderbolt
[1596.62 --> 1597.16] connections,
[1597.78 --> 1598.20] now,
[1598.34 --> 1598.96] all of a sudden,
[1599.04 --> 1599.88] you can create
[1599.88 --> 1601.42] a super-fast network
[1601.42 --> 1602.42] that can connect
[1602.42 --> 1603.24] to Thunderbolt
[1603.24 --> 1604.68] enabled expansion
[1604.68 --> 1605.64] devices such as
[1605.64 --> 1605.96] storage.
[1606.08 --> 1606.52] This makes
[1606.52 --> 1607.40] Thunderbolt a much
[1607.40 --> 1608.62] more feasible
[1608.62 --> 1609.46] option to me
[1609.46 --> 1610.24] because a lot
[1610.24 --> 1611.00] of what we do
[1611.00 --> 1612.72] is in a multi-user
[1612.72 --> 1614.04] working environment
[1614.04 --> 1614.68] where everyone
[1614.68 --> 1615.50] needs to access
[1615.50 --> 1616.50] the same resources
[1616.50 --> 1617.48] at the same time.
[1617.82 --> 1618.78] And for that reason,
[1619.26 --> 1620.30] Thunderbolt has just
[1620.30 --> 1621.62] made no sense to me
[1621.62 --> 1622.44] and the Mac Pro
[1622.44 --> 1623.12] in particular
[1623.12 --> 1624.00] has made no sense
[1624.00 --> 1624.50] to me because
[1624.50 --> 1625.24] it cannot be
[1625.24 --> 1626.24] expanded to
[1626.24 --> 1627.06] 10 gig Ethernet
[1627.06 --> 1628.14] without buying
[1628.14 --> 1628.72] a Thunderbolt
[1628.72 --> 1629.32] enclosure,
[1629.56 --> 1629.98] Thunderbolt to
[1629.98 --> 1630.48] PCI Express
[1630.48 --> 1630.96] enclosure,
[1631.32 --> 1631.88] and then putting
[1631.88 --> 1632.58] a 10 gig
[1632.58 --> 1633.54] Ethernet card
[1633.54 --> 1633.86] in there.
[1633.96 --> 1634.10] Now,
[1634.16 --> 1634.74] you're adapting
[1634.74 --> 1635.56] this to that
[1635.56 --> 1636.00] to that
[1636.00 --> 1636.52] to that
[1636.52 --> 1637.42] in order to
[1637.42 --> 1638.40] just access
[1638.40 --> 1639.60] a network resource
[1639.60 --> 1640.44] because it only
[1640.44 --> 1641.28] has one gigabit
[1641.28 --> 1642.02] Ethernet built
[1642.02 --> 1642.46] into it.
[1642.52 --> 1642.60] Well,
[1642.68 --> 1643.02] now,
[1643.46 --> 1643.80] Thunderbolt
[1643.80 --> 1644.24] looks a little
[1644.24 --> 1644.88] bit more feasible.
[1645.04 --> 1645.14] Now,
[1645.22 --> 1645.82] I do see
[1645.82 --> 1646.52] some negative
[1646.52 --> 1647.20] comments
[1647.20 --> 1648.12] about this
[1648.12 --> 1648.66] technology
[1648.66 --> 1650.10] and one person
[1650.10 --> 1650.96] put it pretty well
[1650.96 --> 1651.38] and said,
[1651.38 --> 1651.96] well,
[1651.96 --> 1652.80] this is ridiculous.
[1653.28 --> 1653.72] We're moving
[1653.72 --> 1654.98] away from
[1654.98 --> 1656.34] centralized switching
[1656.34 --> 1656.82] and we're going
[1656.82 --> 1657.24] back to what?
[1657.32 --> 1658.06] Like token ring?