text
stringlengths
11
441
[2528.78 --> 2531.02] I'm being a rude jackass
[2531.02 --> 2532.82] at dinner experience
[2532.82 --> 2535.26] where it was sitting on the desk right there,
[2535.30 --> 2535.32] and you were near it.
[2535.32 --> 2536.36] I better read the spicy one.
[2536.98 --> 2537.44] No, no.
[2537.50 --> 2539.30] This is the lame-o stuff.
[2539.42 --> 2541.70] I've done the spicy one on stream before.
[2542.14 --> 2543.02] I've had enough.
[2544.00 --> 2545.16] Not today.
[2545.36 --> 2546.34] Today's been a long week.
[2546.40 --> 2547.16] I'll do it again.
[2547.64 --> 2548.70] But, you know,
[2548.98 --> 2551.14] I just don't feel like it today.
[2552.26 --> 2552.70] So,
[2553.26 --> 2554.36] iPhone X.
[2554.76 --> 2556.10] What is there to say, really?
[2556.10 --> 2558.72] I think one last comment is that
[2558.72 --> 2560.44] the bezel-less-ness
[2560.44 --> 2563.24] of this Samsung Galaxy S8
[2563.24 --> 2564.94] is way better.
[2565.42 --> 2566.10] What do you think?
[2567.16 --> 2568.68] Having not held a 10.
[2568.80 --> 2569.84] Having not held a 10.
[2570.80 --> 2572.24] It's not bezel-less.
[2572.32 --> 2573.36] It's just as thin bezels.
[2574.88 --> 2575.64] I agree.
[2576.70 --> 2577.78] With that said,
[2578.18 --> 2580.10] there are times when the infinity edge
[2580.10 --> 2581.98] does interfere with me reaching across the screen.
[2582.14 --> 2583.26] I do have pretty small hands.
[2583.68 --> 2585.12] But on the S8 in particular,
[2585.12 --> 2587.96] it's not nearly as bad as it is for me on the Note 8.
[2588.72 --> 2590.72] And I can pretty much work with it.
[2591.26 --> 2593.36] I love the idea of the S8.
[2593.46 --> 2595.06] I haven't touched an iPhone X yet,
[2595.22 --> 2596.84] but I really like this phone.
[2596.88 --> 2599.12] You can imagine a screen that looks like that
[2599.12 --> 2601.60] and is curved and bezel-less like that.
[2601.82 --> 2602.00] Yeah.
[2602.34 --> 2605.44] But the curved edge actually doesn't register touch at all.
[2605.90 --> 2606.10] Yeah.
[2606.18 --> 2608.68] Like, what if there was a not visible,
[2608.92 --> 2609.92] but haptic bezel?
[2610.32 --> 2611.06] A haptic bezel.
[2611.16 --> 2611.78] A haptic bezel.
[2611.78 --> 2612.22] You know what I mean?
[2612.40 --> 2613.54] Probably a matter of time.
[2613.62 --> 2615.30] I mean, as soon as Apple sees someone else
[2615.30 --> 2617.32] build some stupid weird squeeze engine,
[2617.52 --> 2618.46] they're probably thinking,
[2618.56 --> 2621.12] wow, that's like almost smart.
[2621.18 --> 2623.88] Except if they'd done it with force touch or 3D touch,
[2623.94 --> 2624.82] then it would be way better.
[2625.26 --> 2625.52] Yoink.
[2625.66 --> 2625.98] Booyah.
[2626.76 --> 2627.82] I'm really surprised.
[2627.82 --> 2630.00] I thought the X was going to be a knockoff of the edge,
[2630.10 --> 2632.12] but maybe that was too far for Apple,
[2632.22 --> 2632.94] for even Apple.
[2633.14 --> 2633.56] What do you think?
[2634.40 --> 2634.76] Hmm.
[2636.76 --> 2638.34] No, I wouldn't have expected that.
[2639.18 --> 2641.52] I, I, I, honestly,
[2641.64 --> 2642.94] nothing about it really surprised me.
[2643.02 --> 2645.34] The only thing that surprised and or disappointed me
[2645.34 --> 2646.56] was that we didn't end up
[2646.56 --> 2649.54] with a Touch ID sensor under the screen.
[2649.64 --> 2651.06] Because if it had Face ID
[2651.06 --> 2653.06] and Touch ID through the screen.
[2653.76 --> 2655.58] But is it because they failed to do it properly?
[2655.76 --> 2656.44] That's the rumor.
[2656.44 --> 2656.76] Yeah.
[2657.18 --> 2658.16] Here's another question for you.
[2658.80 --> 2662.30] Samsung is a bottleneck on their kick-ass OLED displays.
[2662.46 --> 2662.64] Mm-hmm.
[2663.12 --> 2664.84] Samsung is making their displays.
[2665.30 --> 2666.46] I'm sure Apple claims to,
[2666.86 --> 2667.58] I'm sure in the keynote,
[2667.70 --> 2669.06] they said that this is the best display
[2669.06 --> 2670.18] you can get on a phone.
[2670.78 --> 2672.08] Is it the case that Samsung
[2672.08 --> 2673.98] also has those exact displays?
[2674.10 --> 2677.28] Or is there like an exclusivity clause
[2677.28 --> 2678.96] that Apple has the rights to that display,
[2679.02 --> 2680.30] even though Samsung's the one making it?
[2680.60 --> 2681.46] Funny you bring that up.
[2681.58 --> 2683.30] The issue with Samsung's displays,
[2683.44 --> 2685.20] the thing that makes them not as good as Apple's,
[2685.20 --> 2688.96] is that Samsung intentionally craps all over them.
[2689.28 --> 2690.18] That's the issue.
[2690.38 --> 2692.16] You mean to get other gains?
[2692.80 --> 2694.66] Like they sacrifice something for something else?
[2694.72 --> 2697.06] Well, they go full Best Buy,
[2697.06 --> 2703.44] crank the vividness mode on it.
[2703.44 --> 2706.16] And it's something that I just,
[2706.28 --> 2708.86] I don't think there's any way they're going to stop doing it.
[2709.08 --> 2711.06] Is that an Asian sensibility versus American sensibility?
[2711.06 --> 2714.18] I don't know.
[2714.84 --> 2716.30] It's a hard thing to,