Datasets:
willtheorangeguy
/
2018-WAN-Show-Transcripts

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
 Community
text
stringlengths
14
502
[525.80 --> 527.28] They literally did say that.
[527.58 --> 528.00] Oh.
[529.04 --> 530.08] So, okay.
[530.64 --> 536.40] In fairness to Sony, in defense of Sony, something that I'm not 100% sure if they deserve right now.
[537.12 --> 540.84] No one cares about their phones anyways.
[541.06 --> 543.54] No, that is not what I was going to say.
[543.56 --> 544.80] To be clear there, I was also kidding.
[545.14 --> 548.18] In fairness to Sony, I never set the announcement video live.
[548.26 --> 549.56] I was trying to figure out why so few people are watching.
[549.56 --> 552.82] I used to like their phones until we had so many of them just bend in half.
[553.76 --> 554.04] Yeah.
[554.42 --> 555.40] Well, two, I think.
[556.44 --> 556.76] Three?
[557.48 --> 558.76] Burkle's mine, yours.
[559.12 --> 559.96] Burkle's did too?
[560.06 --> 560.20] Yeah.
[560.36 --> 561.36] Oh, I didn't even know that.
[561.42 --> 561.56] Yeah.
[561.68 --> 562.52] How do you manage to do that?
[562.54 --> 563.14] It was a compact.
[563.90 --> 566.52] The compacts have the same issue, it's just less likely.
[566.52 --> 567.48] It was just Burkle.
[569.48 --> 570.70] He's an action man.
[571.36 --> 573.18] Probably more action-y in his pants.
[573.50 --> 573.70] Wow.
[573.80 --> 574.62] I meant like, wow.
[574.76 --> 574.98] Okay.
[575.04 --> 577.92] Actually, my defense of Sony is actually worse than anything you said.
[578.04 --> 578.16] Okay.
[578.16 --> 583.20] In defense of, in Sony's defense, the last time they tried to do something really innovative
[583.20 --> 587.22] that was probably really expensive from an R&D perspective.
[587.34 --> 590.00] Because remember, Sony was the one that made waterproof mainstream.
[590.60 --> 591.12] That was cool.
[591.12 --> 592.16] That was very cool.
[592.28 --> 593.62] That's why I used to really like their phones.
[594.14 --> 594.46] And then it bent and half.
[594.46 --> 597.44] They still didn't manage to sell more phones because of it, but that's a whole other issue.
[597.78 --> 601.34] The last time they tried to do something, they were the first to have a 4K display.
[602.14 --> 605.62] Now, creating a 4K mobile display, you guys got to understand.
[605.62 --> 614.04] When you have a feature on your phone, let's say OnePlus launches a 2560x1080 mobile display.
[614.28 --> 614.38] Yeah.
[614.88 --> 619.64] OnePlus did not go and get that freaking panel created.
[620.16 --> 622.22] They are a relatively small player.
[622.22 --> 634.86] And when you're a relatively small player doing relatively small volume, you don't get to walk up to Samsung's display division or LG or AUO or Philips or whoever it is.
[635.16 --> 638.36] You don't get to walk up and be like, yo, we need a custom SKU.
[638.56 --> 643.28] It needs to have this color gamut, this response time.
[643.38 --> 645.08] It needs to be this size at this resolution.
[645.24 --> 646.86] They're going to laugh you out of their office.
[647.72 --> 650.98] You get to do that when you're Apple, when you're Samsung.
[650.98 --> 656.34] Believe it or not, Apple's notch display was custom created just for them.
[656.86 --> 663.48] Because until Apple did it, of course, after Apple does it, which ties into Sony's other reason, of course, other people want it.
[663.52 --> 666.52] But until Apple did it, nobody else was going to want that.
[668.20 --> 680.00] So Sony would have had to actually create a 4K mobile display in that form factor for that phone that, quite honestly, they probably didn't sell a ton of.
[680.00 --> 681.32] It's based on our straw poll results.
[681.38 --> 682.86] And also you can just Google it.
[683.42 --> 686.60] And just see, like, the people around you, what phones they're using.
[686.66 --> 688.64] So they didn't, yeah, when's the last time you saw one?
[688.80 --> 688.96] Yeah.
[688.96 --> 696.02] So Sony didn't probably get a great ROI on that particular, you know, breaking the mold kind of investment.
[696.12 --> 701.00] Although even then, giving them credit for breaking the mold in that way is not entirely fair.
[701.00 --> 703.02] Because they were just following an overall market trend.
[703.10 --> 706.00] They were just trying to get out ahead of it in a way that was totally meaningless and stupid.
[706.00 --> 708.90] Yes, and almost never even worked anyways.
[709.04 --> 712.62] The phone ran in default 1080p almost all the time.
[712.72 --> 716.82] And then you'd, like, view a picture that was in 4K and you'd have to wait a second.
[716.82 --> 719.58] And then it would just, like, and then change resolution.
[719.74 --> 720.66] It was really weird.
[721.10 --> 721.92] It was very odd.
[721.98 --> 723.62] Almost everything ran at 1080p.
[724.50 --> 725.14] But anyways.
[725.14 --> 728.70] So I can see how they don't want to take any risks.
[728.70 --> 735.02] Because you have to move a lot of devices to make up for any kind of R&D investment.
[735.74 --> 737.42] Beyond just even the basics.
[739.56 --> 741.16] But I'm just, I'm disappointed.
[741.34 --> 746.28] I was thrilled to see that Samsung still had the headphone jack on the S9 and S9+.
[746.28 --> 748.70] I think that, you know what?
[748.88 --> 749.12] Yeah.
[749.32 --> 751.08] The mainstream is moving to wireless.
[751.62 --> 755.04] But Samsung is going to sell some handsets just for that.
[755.04 --> 757.10] And I really hope that they do get rewarded for it.
[758.06 --> 758.24] Yeah.
[758.40 --> 758.84] All right.
[759.72 --> 761.94] What do we got for our next topic here?
[763.68 --> 765.46] Oh, should we get into the NVIDIA thing?
[765.46 --> 767.18] They're just all big, deep ones.
[767.24 --> 768.30] I just have such a headache.
[768.30 --> 770.98] There's this thing if you want to go pretty light and easy.
[771.40 --> 772.28] No, no.
[772.38 --> 774.04] Let's just get this out of the way.
[774.14 --> 774.32] Okay.
[775.02 --> 777.16] So the GeForce Partner Program.
[777.32 --> 778.94] This was originally posted on the forum.
[779.02 --> 782.16] This is actually an 11-page topic over on our forum.
[782.16 --> 785.24] And it was posted by WMGroomAK.
[785.94 --> 788.68] And this lady or gentleman, whichever it is.
[789.76 --> 789.98] Okay.
[790.00 --> 792.04] Let's go ahead and get a screenshot going on here.
[793.16 --> 799.94] Basically read an article over on HardOCP from Kyle Bennett and said this.
[800.46 --> 804.52] Found all of this interesting if his reporting checks out.
[804.52 --> 810.80] Because basically, and this is sort of the problem.