Add files using upload-large-folder tool

.gitattributes

@@ -57,3 +57,7 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 # Video files - compressed
 *.mp4 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.webm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+AmazonCat-13K/num_14_train.csv filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+AmazonCat-13K/num_1_train.csv filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+AmazonCat-13K/all_test.csv filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+AmazonCat-13K/num_12_train.csv filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

AmazonCat-13K/all_test.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b2aed3c0add2c68614daa486a668e704e1c9ff0b03d4472561707e9923f2366f
+size 28803594

AmazonCat-13K/num_12_train.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:53578d8ab60c0fdf118a75b7e53baeb84addcd330b9bd129c5d8528e96412946
+size 36864211

AmazonCat-13K/num_14_train.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6ec29cf2ab598b6763da7bee5ded8e4e5d9f016dd8540540cc021d68fd4abd32
+size 25991934

AmazonCat-13K/num_1_train.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3ff09e69238013f5d5748b5941f71d89ba0fa05aecd7b0f6711d555e34ef171d
+size 69139992

Eurlex-4.3K/num_1_test.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+uid,text,target,num_keyphrases
+5561,"Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1834/87 of 30 June 1987 extending certain time limits for the certification of hops. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1696/71 of 26 July 1971 on the common organization of the market in hops (1), as last amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3800/85 (2),Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1784/77 of 1 July 1977 on the certification of hops (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2039/85 (4), and in particular Article 1 (3),Whereas the said Regulation (EEC) No 1784/77 set an annual deadline for the certification of hop cones; whereas it also provides that this date may be deferred for four months when disposal problems arise for a given harvest; whereas this situation has arisen in respect of the 1986 harvest in certain regions of the Community; whereas, therefore, the deadline for the certification of hop cones from the 1986 harvest should be deferred to 31 July 1987;Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Hops,. For the 1986 harvest the final date for the certification of hop cones is hereby postponed to 31 July 1987. This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.It shall apply with effect from 1 April 1987.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 30 June 1987.For the CommissionFrans ANDRIESSENVice-President(1) OJ No L 175, 4. 8. 1971, p. 1.(2) OJ No L 367, 31. 12. 1985, p. 32.(3) OJ No L 200, 8. 8. 1977, p. 1.(4) OJ No L 193, 25. 7. 1985, p. 1.
+",hops,1
+7874,"90/148/EEC: Council Decision of 22 March 1990 fixing the number of officials whose service may be terminated in 1990. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing a Single Council and a Single Commission of the European Communities,Having regard to Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 3518/85 of 12 December 1985 introducing special measures to terminate the service of officials of the European Communities as a result of the accession of Spain and Portugal (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 2 (2) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas, for each institution, the number of officials eligible for termination of service measures during 1990 should be fixed in accordance with the conditions laid down in Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 3518/85;Whereas it is appropriate to guarantee that use can be made in 1990 of the possibilities for termination of service of which use was not made from 1986 to 1989, within the limits laid down in Article 2 (1) of Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 3518/85,. The number of officials eligible for termination of service measures in 1990 shall be:- 60 for the European Parliament,- 65 for the Council,- 47 for the Commission, under the 'operating' budget,- five for the Commission, under the 'research' budget,- 14 for the Court of Justice,- two for the Economic and Social Committee,- two for the Court of Auditors.. Done at Brussels, 22 March 1990.For the CouncilThe PresidentP. FLYNN(1) OJ No L 335, 13. 12. 1985, p. 56.
+",termination of employment,1
+7247,"Commission Regulation (EEC) No 216/89 of 27 January 1989 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2006/80 determining the intervention centres for cereals. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2727/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organization of the market in cereals (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2221/88 (2), and in particular Article 3 (7) thereof,Whereas Council Regulation (EEC) No 1145/76 (3) lays down the rules applicable for determining centres for cereals;Whereas the intervention centres were determined by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2006/80 (4), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3136/88 (5); whereas following the consultations provided for in Article 3 (7) of Regulation (EEC) No 2727/75, the list of the said centres should be amended;Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,. The section headed 'Bundesrepublik Deutschland' in the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 2006/80 is hereby amended as follows:In 'Land Bayern':- 'Geiselhoering' is deleted as an intervention centre for rye,- 'Regensburg' is added as an intervention centre for maize. This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 27 January 1989.For the CommissionRay MAC SHARRYMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 281, 1. 11. 1975, p. 1.(2) OJ No L 197, 26. 7. 1988, p. 16.(3) OJ No L 130, 19. 5. 1976, p. 8.(4) OJ No L 197, 30. 7. 1980, p. 1.(5) OJ No L 280, 13. 10. 1988, p. 10.
+",tied sales outlet,1
+8888,"91/369/EEC: Commission Decision of 17 July 1991 on the suspension of the buying-in of butter in certain Member States (Only the English, French and Dutch texts are authentic). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organization of the market in milk and milk products (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1630/91 (2), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7a (1)  and Article 7a (3) thereof,Whereas Council Regulation (EEC) No 777/87 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1634/91 (4), sets out the circumstances in which the buying-in of butter and skimmed-milk powder can be suspended and subsequently resumed and, where suspension takes  place, the alternative measures that may be taken;Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1547/87 (5), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2011/91 (6), lays down the criteria on the basis of which the buying-in by tender of butter is opened and suspended in a Member State or, as regards the United  Kingdom and the Federal Republic of Germany, in a region;Whereas the requirement laid down in Article 1 (3) of that Regulation is fulfilled in Belgium, France and Northern Ireland;Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,. The buying-in of butter by tender provided for in Article 1 (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 777/87 is hereby suspended in Belgium, France and Northern Ireland. This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, The French Republic and the United Kingdom.. Done at Brussels, 17 July 1991. For the CommissionRay MAC SHARRYMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 13. (2) OJ No L 150, 15. 6. 1991, p. 19. (3) OJ No L 78, 20. 3. 1987, p. 10. (4) OJ No L 150, 15. 6. 1991, p. 26. (5) OJ No L 144, 4. 6. 1987, p. 12. (6) OJ No L 185, 11. 7. 1991, p. 5.
+",intervention buying,1
+9560,"Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2851/91 of 27 September 1991 fixing for the 1991/92 marketing year the reference prices for cabbage lettuce. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72 of 18 May 1972 on the common organization of the market in fruit and vegetables (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1623/91 (2), and in particular Article 27 (1) thereof,Whereas, pursuant to Article 23 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72, reference prices valid for the whole Community are to be fixed at the beginning of the marketing year;Whereas cabbage lettuce is produced in such quantities in the Community that reference prices should be fixed for it;Whereas cabbage lettuce harvested during a given crop year is marketed from July to June of the following year; whereas the quantities imported from 1 July to 31 October and in June are so small that there is no need to fix reference prices for these  months; whereas reference prices should be fixed only for the period 1 November up to and including 31 May of the following year;Whereas Article 23 (2) (b) of Regulation (EEC) No 1035/72 stipulates that reference prices are to be fixed at the same level as for the preceding marketing year, adjusted, after deducting the standard cost of transporting Community products between  production areas and Community consumption centres in the preceding year, by:- the increase in production costs for fruit and vegetables, less productivity growth, and- the standard rate of transport costs in the current marketing year;Whereas the resulting figure may nevertheless not exceed the arithmetic mean of producer prices in each Member State plus transport costs for the current year, after this amount has been increased by the rise in production costs less productivity  growth; whereas the reference price may, however, not be lower than in the preceding marketing year;Whereas, to take seasonal price variations into account, the marketing year should be divided into several periods and a reference price fixed for each of these periods;Whereas producer prices are to correspond to the average of the prices recorded on the representative market or markets situated in the production areas where prices are lowest, during the three years prior to the date on which the reference price is  fixed, for a home-grown product with defined commercial characteristics, being a product or variety representing a substantial proportion of the production marketed over the year or over part thereof and satisfying specified requirements as regards  market preparation; whereas, when the average of prices recorded on each representative market is being calculated, prices which could be considered excessively high or excessively low in relation to normal price fluctuations on that market are to be  disregarded;Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Fruit and Vegetables,. For the 1991/92 marketing year, the reference prices for cabbage lettuce (CN codes 0705 11 10 and 90), expressed in ecus per 100 kilograms net of packed products of Class I, of all sizes, shall be as follows:- from 1 November to 31 December 1991: 70,82,- from 1 January to 29 February 1992: 76,11,- from 1 March to 31 May 1992: 82,90. This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 November 1991. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 27 September 1991. For the CommissionRay MAC SHARRYMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 118, 20. 5. 1972, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 150, 15. 6. 1991, p. 8.
+",reference price,1

Eurlex-4.3K/num_28_test.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+uid,text,target,num_keyphrases
+43412,"2014/420/EU: Council Decision of 23 June 2014 on the position to be adopted by the European Union within the Joint Committee established by the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland of 22 July 1972 , as regards the replacement of Protocol 3 to that Agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation, by a new Protocol which, as regards the rules of origin, refers to the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 207(4) in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,Whereas:(1) Protocol 3 to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland (1), (‘the Agreement’), concerns the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation, (‘Protocol 3’).(2) The Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin (2), (‘the Convention’), lays down provisions on the origin of goods traded under relevant Agreements concluded between the Contracting Parties.(3) The Union and Iceland signed the Convention on 15 June 2011 and 30 June 2011, respectively.(4) The Union and Iceland deposited their instruments of acceptance with the depositary of the Convention on 26 March 2012 and 12 March 2012, respectively. As a consequence, in application of Article 10(3) of the Convention, the Convention entered into force in relation to both the Union and Iceland on 1 May 2012.(5) Article 6 of the Convention provides that each Contracting Party is to take appropriate measures to ensure that the Convention is effectively applied. To that effect, the Joint Committee established by the Agreement should adopt a Decision replacing Protocol 3 by a new Protocol which, with regard to the rules of origin, refers to the Convention.(6) The position of the Union within the Joint Committee should therefore be based on the attached draft decision,. The position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Committee established by the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland, as regards the replacement of Protocol 3 to that Agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation, by a new Protocol which, as regards the rules of origin, refers to the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin, shall be based on the draft decision of the Joint Committee attached to this Decision.Minor changes to the draft decision may be agreed to by the representatives of the Union in the Joint Committee without further decision of the Council. The Decision of the Joint Committee shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.. Done at Luxembourg, 23 June 2014.For the CouncilThe PresidentC. ASHTON(1)  OJ L 301, 31.12.1972, p. 2.(2)  OJ L 54, 26.2.2013, p. 4.DRAFTDECISION OF THE EU-ICELAND JOINT COMMITTEE No […]of […]amending Protocol 3 to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperationTHE JOINT COMMITTEE,Having regard to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland, signed in Brussels on 22 July 1972 (1), (‘the Agreement’), and in particular its Article 11,Having regard to Protocol 3 to the Agreement concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation, (‘Protocol 3’),Whereas:(1) Article 11 of the Agreement refers to Protocol 3 which lays down the rules of origin and provides for cumulation of origin between the EU, Iceland, Switzerland (including Liechtenstein), Norway, Turkey, the Faroe Islands and the participants in the Barcelona Process (2).(2) Article 39 of Protocol 3 provides that the Joint Committee provided for in Article 30 of the Agreement may decide to amend the provisions of this protocol.(3) The Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin (3) (‘the Convention’), aims to replace the protocols on rules of origin currently in force among the countries of the pan-Euro-Mediterranean area with a single legal act.(4) The EU and Iceland signed the Convention on 15 June 2011 and 30 June 2011, respectively.(5) The EU and Iceland deposited their instruments of acceptance with the depositary of the Convention on 26 March 2012 and 12 March 2012, respectively. Consequently, in application of its Article 10(3), the Convention entered into force in relation to the EU and Iceland on 1 May 2012.(6) The Convention has included participants in the Stabilisation and Association Process in the pan-Euro-Mediterranean zone of cumulation of origin.(7) Where the transition towards the Convention is not simultaneous for all Contracting Parties within the cumulation zone, it should not lead to any less favourable situation than previously under the Protocol.(8) Protocol 3 to the Agreement should therefore be amended so as to make reference to the Convention,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1Protocol 3 to the Agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation shall be replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Decision.Article 2This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.It shall apply from 1 September 2014.Done atFor the Joint CommitteeThe President…(1)  OJ L 301, 31.12.1972, p. 2.(2)  Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Palestine, Syria and Tunisia.(3)  OJ L 54, 26.2.2013, p. 4.ANNEXProtocol 3concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperationArticle 1Applicable rules of originFor the purpose of implementing this Agreement, Appendix I and the relevant provisions of Appendix II to the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin (1), (‘the Convention’) shall apply.All references to the ‘relevant agreement’ in Appendix I and in the relevant provisions of Appendix II to the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin shall be construed so as to mean this Agreement.Article 2Dispute settlementWhere disputes arise in relation to the verification procedures of Article 32 of Appendix I to the Convention that cannot be settled between the customs authorities requesting the verification and the custom authorities responsible for carrying out this verification, they shall be submitted to the Joint Committee.In all cases the settlement of disputes between the importer and the customs authorities of the importing country shall take place under the legislation of that country.Article 3Amendments to the ProtocolThe Joint Committee may decide to amend the provisions of this Protocol.Article 4Withdrawal from the Convention1.   Should either the EU or Iceland give notice in writing to the depositary of the Convention of their intention to withdraw from the Convention according to its Article 9, the EU and Iceland shall immediately enter into negotiations on rules of origin for the purpose of implementing this Agreement.2.   Until the entry into force of such newly negotiated rules of origin, the rules of origin contained in Appendix I and, where appropriate, the relevant provisions of Appendix II to the Convention, applicable at the moment of withdrawal, shall continue to apply to this Agreement. However, as of the moment of withdrawal, the rules of origin contained in Appendix I and, where appropriate, the relevant provisions of Appendix II to the Convention shall be construed so as to allow bilateral cumulation between the EU and Iceland only.Article 5Transitional provisions — cumulation1.   Notwithstanding Article 3 of Appendix I to the Convention, the rules on cumulation provided for in Articles 3 and 4 of Protocol 3 to this Agreement, as amended by Decision No 2/2005 of the EU-Iceland Joint Committee of 22 December 2005 (2), shall continue to apply between the EU and Iceland until the Convention has entered into application in relation to all Contracting Parties listed in Articles 3 and 4 of Protocol 3 to this Agreement.2.   Notwithstanding Articles 16(5) and 21(3) of Appendix I of the Convention, where cumulation involves only EFTA States, the Faroe Islands, the EU, Turkey and the participants in the Stabilisation and Association Process, the proof of origin may be a movement certificate EUR.1 or an origin declaration.(1)  OJ L 54, 26.2.2013, p. 4.(2)  OJ L 131, 18.5.2006, p. 2.
+",agreement (EU);EC agreement;EC third country convention;EU-third country agreement;European Union agreement;international agreement (EU);trade intermediary;middleman;Iceland;Republic of Iceland;administrative cooperation;regional cooperation;inter-regional cooperation;generalised preferences;GSP;general system of preferences;generalised preferences scheme;generalised preferences system;generalised tariff preferences;generalized preferences;originating product;origin of goods;product origin;rule of origin;protocol to an agreement;revision of an agreement;amendment of an agreement;revision of a treaty,28
+23946,"Commission Regulation (EC) No 1111/2002 of 26 June 2002 setting export refunds on products processed from fruit and vegetables other than those granted for added sugar. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in products processed from fruit and vegetables(1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2699/2000(2), and in particular Article 16(3),Whereas:(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1429/95(3), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1962/2001(4), sets implementing rules for export refunds on products processed from fruit and vegetables.(2) Article 16(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 states that, to the extent necessary to permit exports in economically significant quantities of the products referred to in Article 1(1)(a) of that Regulation, on the basis of prices for those products in international trade, the difference between those prices and prices in the Community may be covered by export refunds; Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 provides that, if the refund on sugar incorporated into the products listed in Article 1(1) is insufficient to allow export of the products, the refund fixed in accordance with Article 17 is to be applicable to those products.(3) Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 states that refunds must be fixed with regard to the existing situation and outlook for prices for products processed from fruit and vegetables on the Community market and supply availability, on the one hand, and prices in international trade on the other hand. Account must also be taken of the costs indicated at (b) in that paragraph and of the economic aspect of the envisaged exports.(4) Refunds are, pursuant to Article 16(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96, to be set with due regard to the limits resulting from agreements concluded in accordance with Article 300 of the Treaty.(5) Article 17(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 states that prices on the Community market are to be determined taking account of those most favourable from the exportation standpoint; whereas international trade prices are to be determined account taken of the prices indicated in the second subparagraph of that paragraph.(6) The international trade situation or the special requirements of certain markets may make it necessary to vary the refund on a given product depending on the destination of that product.(7) Economically significant exports can be made at the present time of provisionally preserved cherries, peeled tomatoes, preserved cherries, prepared hazelnuts and some orange juices.(8) Application of the rules mentioned above to the present and forecast market situation, in particular to prices of products processed from fruit and vegetables in the Community and in international trade, leads to the refund rates set in the Annex hereto.(9) Pursuant to Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2201/96, the most efficient possible use should be made of the resources available without creating discrimination between traders. Therefore, care should be taken not to disturb the trade flows previously induced by the refund arrangements.(10) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87(5), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1007/2002(6), establishes an agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds.(11) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000(7), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2299/2001(8), lays down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance fixing certificates for agricultural products.(12) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Products Processed from Fruit and Vegetables,. 1. The export refund rates in the processed fruit and vegetables sector shall be those fixed in the Annex hereto.2. Quantities for which licences are issued in the context of food aid, as referred to in Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 shall not count against the eligible quantities referred to in the first paragraph. This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 June 2002.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 26 June 2002.For the CommissionFranz FischlerMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 29.(2) OJ L 311, 12.12.2000, p. 9.(3) OJ L 141, 24.6.1995, p. 28.(4) OJ L 268, 9.10.2001, p. 19.(5) OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1.(6) OJ L 153, 13.6.2002, p. 8.(7) OJ L 152, 24.6.2000, p. 1.(8) OJ L 308, 27.11.2001, p. 19.ANNEXto the Commission Regulation of 26 June 2002 setting export refunds on products processed from fruit and vegetables other than those granted for added sugar>TABLE>NB:The product codes and the ""A"" series destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1) as amended.The numeric destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2020/2001 (OJ L 273, 16.10.2001, p. 6).The other destinations are defined as follows:F00: All destinations except for Estonia,F06: All destinations except the countries of North America and Estonia,F10: All other destinations except the United States of America, Slovakia, Latvia, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Estonia.
+",common organisation of markets;CMO;Single CMO;common market organisation;common organization of markets;single common market organisation;fruit product;fruit must;fruit pulp;grape must;jam;marmalade;preserves;vegetable product;pickles;sauerkraut;tomato concentrate;tomato paste;vegetable pulp;export refund;Community aid to exports;advance determination of refunds;amount of refund;fixing of refund;maximum refund;sugar;fructose;fruit sugar,28
+14397,"Commission Regulation (EC) No 1923/95 of 3 August 1995 fixing the quantities of banana imports for supply to the Community for the fourth quarter of 1995. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 of 13 February 1993 on the common organization  of the market in bananas  (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3290/94  (2), and in  particular Article 20 thereof,Whereas Article 9 (1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1442/93  (3), as last amended by Regulation  (EC) No 1164/95  (4), provides that indicative quantities, expressed where necessary as percentages  of the shares allocated to the various countries or groups of countries listed in Annex I to  Commission Regulation (EC) No 478/95  (5), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 702/95  (6), or of  the quantities of those quotas available are to be fixed using data and forecasts relating to the  Community market, for the purposes of issuing import licences for each quarter;Whereas the tariff quota quantities available for imports from the countries or groups of countries  listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 478/95 for the fourth quarter of 1995 should be determined  taking account on the one hand of the import licences or authorizations issued during the first  three quarters of 1995 and on the other hand of the tariff quota provided for in Article 18 of  Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 plus the additional quantity laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No  1924/95  (7);Whereas, with a view to achieving the same objectives, the indicative quantities provided for in  Article 14 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1442/93 should be fixed for the purposes of issuing licences  for traditional banana imports from the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States;Whereas those quantities do not include the unused quantities to be reallocated pursuant to Article  10 (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 1442/93 to use up the tariff quota and, as regards imports from the  ACP States, pursuant to Article 17 (4) thereof;Whereas this Regulation must enter into force immediately so that licence applications can be  lodged in respect of the fourth quarter of 1995;Whereas the Management Committee for Bananas has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set  by its chairman,. 1.  The quantities available for import in respect of the fourth  quarter of 1995 under the tariff quota arrangements for banana imports from the countries or groups  of countries listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 478/95 shall be as set out in Annex I hereto.2.  Applications for import licences in respect of the fourth quarter of 1995 from individual  operators may not cover a quantity exceeding the difference between the quantity allocated to the  operator pursuant to Article 4 (4) and Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 1442/93 and the total  quantity covered by import licences issued to him in respect of the first three quarters of 1995.  Import licence applications shall be accompanied by copies of any import licences issued to the  operator in respect of the preceding quarters of 1995.The first subparagraph shall not apply to operators established in Austria, Finland or Sweden.In the case of operators established elsewhere in the Community, the first subparagraph shall apply  without prejudice to rights defined by Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/95. Pursuant to Article 14 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1442/93, quantities available for  traditional imports of bananas from the ACP States for the fourth quarter of 1995 shall be as set  out in Annex II hereto. This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official  Journal of the European Communities.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all  Member States.. Done at Brussels, 3 August 1995.For the Commission Hans VAN DEN BROEK Member of the CommissionANNEX ITariff quota quantities available for banana imports from the countries or  groups of countries listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 478/95 in respect of the fourth quarter  of 1995TABLE 1>TABLE>TABLE 2>TABLE>TABLE 3>TABLE>ANNEX IIQuantities available for traditional imports of bananas from the ACP States in  respect of the fourth quarter of 1995>TABLE>
+",tropical fruit;avocado;banana;date;guava;kiwifruit;mango;papaw;pineapple;tariff quota;administration of tariff quota;allocation of tariff quota;opening of tariff quota;quota at a reduced level of duty;zero-duty quota;import licence;import authorisation;import certificate;import permit;supply;quantitative restriction;quantitative ceiling;quota;EU Member State;EC country;EU country;European Community country;European Union country,28
+3287,"2003/177/EC: Commission Decision of 12 March 2003 amending Decision 1999/465/EC establishing the officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free status of bovine herds of certain Member States or regions of Member States (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 739). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 64/432/EEC on health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine(1), as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1226/2002(2), and in particular Annex D.I (E) thereof,Whereas:(1) Commission Decision 1999/465/EC(3), as amended by Commission Decision 2001/28/EC(4) granted, as regards bovine herds, the officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free status to certain Member States and regions thereof.(2) The competent authorities of Italy submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with all of the conditions provided for in Annex D.I (E) of Directive 64/432/EEC, as regards the Region of Emilia-Romagna.(3) It appears therefore appropriate to consider the region of Emilia-Romagna officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free in accordance with the provisions of Directive 64/432/EEC.(4) Decision 1999/465/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.(5) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,. Annex II to Decision 1999/465/EC is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision. This Decision is addressed to the Member States.. Done at Brussels, 12 March 2003.For the CommissionDavid ByrneMember of the Commission(1) OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977/64.(2) OJ L 179, 9.7.2002, p. 13.(3) OJ L 181, 16.7.1999, p. 32.(4) OJ L 6, 11.1.2001, p. 21.ANNEX""ANNEX IIREGIONS OF MEMBER STATES DECLARED OFFICIALLY FREE OF ENZOOTIC BOVINE LEUKOSISGreat Britain (United Kingdom)Northern Ireland (United Kingdom)Province Bolzano (Italy)Province Trento (Italy)Region Val d'Aosta (Italy)Region Emilia Romagna (Italy)."".
+",Italy;Italian Republic;veterinary legislation;veterinary regulations;animal leucosis;bovine leucosis;health control;biosafety;health inspection;health inspectorate;health watch;United Kingdom;United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;cattle;bovine species;breed of cattle;buffalo;full-grown cattle;ruminant;EU Member State;EC country;EU country;European Community country;European Union country;livestock;flock;herd;live animals,28
+16190,"97/453/EC: Commission Decision of 1 July 1997 concerning a request for exemption submitted by Germany pursuant to Article 8 (2) (c) of Council Directive 70/156/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers (Only the German text is authentic). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers (1), as last amended by European Parliament and Council Directive 96/79/EC (2), and in particular Article 8 (2) (c) thereof,Whereas the request submitted by Germany on 5 August 1996, which was received by the Commission on 14 August 1996, was accompanied by a report containing the information required by Article 8 (2) (c); whereas the request concerns two types of gas discharge lamp for two types of headlamp for one type of motor vehicle;Whereas the information provided by Germany shows that the technology and principle embodied in these new types of gas discharge lamp and headlamp do not meet the requirements of Community regulations; whereas, however, the descriptions of the tests, the results thereof and the action taken in order to ensure road safety are satisfactory and ensure a level of safety equivalent to that of the lamps and headlamps covered by the requirements of the Directives in force and, in particular, of Council Directive 76/761/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to motor-vehicle headlamps which function as main-beam and/or dipped-beam and to incandescent electric filament lamps for such headlamps (3), as last amended by Commission Directive 89/517/EEC (4);Whereas these new types of gas discharge lamp and these new types of headlamp meet the requirements of UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) Regulations Nos 98 and 99; whereas it is therefore justified to allow the three items covered by the request for exemption, i.e. the types of gas discharge lamp, the two types of headlamp fitted with these types of lamp and the type of motor vehicle, to benefit from the granting of EC type-approval on condition that the type of vehicle concerned is equipped with an automatic headlamp levelling system, a headlamp cleaning device and a system guaranteeing that dipped-beam headlamps are lit even if the main-beam headlamps are lit;Whereas the Community Directives concerned will be amended in order to enable gas discharge lamps embodying this new technology, headlamps fitted with such lamps and motor vehicles equipped with such headlamps to be placed on the market;Whereas the measure provided for in this Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Adaptation to Technical Progress set up by Directive 70/156/EEC,. The request submitted by Germany for an exemption concerning two types of gas discharge lamp for two types of headlamp for one type of motor vehicle is hereby approved on condition that the vehicle type concerned is equipped with an automatic headlamp levelling system, a headlamp cleaning device and a system guaranteeing that dipped-beam headlamps are lit even if the main-beam headlamps are lit. This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.. Done at Brussels, 1 July 1997.For the CommissionMartin BANGEMANNMember of the Commission(1) OJ No L 42, 23. 2. 1970, p. 1.(2) OJ No L 18, 21. 1. 1997, p. 7.(3) OJ No L 262, 27. 9. 1976, p. 96.(4) OJ No L 265, 12. 9. 1989, p. 15.
+",Germany;FRG;Federal Republic of Germany;German Federal Republic;West Germany;approximation of laws;legislative harmonisation;motor vehicle;commercial vehicle;juggernaut;lorry;lorry tanker;trailer;truck;signalling device;anti-dazzle headlamp;audible warning device;dipped-beam headlamp;fog lamp;light;lighting system;main-beam headlamp;side marker lamp;stop lamp;vehicle signals;derogation from EU law;derogation from Community law;derogation from European Union law,28
+33427,"Council Decision 2007/244/CFSP of 23 April 2007 implementing Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP on the European Union civilian-military supporting action to the African Union mission in the Darfur region of Sudan. ,Having regard to Council Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP of 18 July 2005 on the European Union civilian-military supporting action to the African Union mission in the Darfur region of Sudan (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 8(1) thereof, in conjunction with Article 23(2) of the Treaty on European Union,Whereas:(1) On 17 October 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/725/CFSP (2) concerning the implementation of Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP on the European Union civilian-military supporting action to the African Union mission in the Darfur region of Sudan, which extended the financing for its civilian component until 30 April 2007.(2) Pending transition of the African Union (AU) mission to a UN/AU hybrid operation, the Council has, in accordance with Article 2 of Decision 2006/486/CFSP (3), decided to continue the European Union civilian-military supporting action to the African Union mission in the Darfur region of Sudan.(3) Therefore, as concerns the civilian component, the Council should decide on the financing of the continuation of this supporting action.(4) The supporting action will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could harm the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy as set out in Article 11 of the Treaty,. 1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the implementation of Section II of Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP from 1 May 2007 until 31 October 2007 shall be EUR 2 125 000. This amount shall cover the period of the current mandate of the AU Mission in the Darfur region of Sudan (AMIS) and a subsequent transitional period leading to a possible transition to a UN/AU hybrid operation.2.   The expenditure financed by the amount stipulated in paragraph 1 shall be managed in accordance with the European Community procedures and rules applicable to the general budget of the European Union, with the exception that any pre-financing shall not remain the property of the Community.Nationals of third states shall be allowed to tender for contracts.3.   The expenditure shall be eligible from 1 May 2007. The Council shall, no later than 30 June 2007, evaluate whether the EU supporting action should be continued. This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption. This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.. Done at Luxembourg, 23 April 2007.For the CouncilThe PresidentF.-W. STEINMEIER(1)  OJ L 188, 20.7.2005, p. 46.(2)  OJ L 296, 26.10.2006, p. 24.(3)  Council Decision 2006/486/CFSP of 11 July 2006 concerning the implementation of Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP on the European Union civilian-military supporting action to the African Union mission in the Darfur region of Sudan (OJ L 192, 13.7.2006, p. 30).
+",peacekeeping;keeping the peace;preserving peace;safeguarding peace;military cooperation;military agreement;military aid;African Union;AU;African Unity Organisation;African Unity Organization;OAU;Organisation of African Unity;Organization of African Unity;forces abroad;military adviser;Sudan;Republic of Sudan;administrative expenditure (EU);EC administrative expenditure;EC operating budget;administrative budget of the Institutions;budget of the Community institutions;common foreign and security policy;CFSP;European foreign policy;common foreign policy;common security policy,28
+37745,"2010/65/: Commission Decision of 5 February 2010 amending Decision 2005/880/EC granting a derogation requested by the Netherlands pursuant to Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (notified under document C(2010) 606). ,Having regard to the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of paragraph 2 of Annex III thereto,Whereas:(1) If the amount of manure that a Member State intends to apply per hectare each year is different from the one specified in the first sentence of the second subparagraph of paragraph 2 of Annex III to Directive 91/676/EEC and in point (a) thereof, that amount has to be fixed so as not to prejudice the achievement of the objectives specified in Article 1 of that Directive and has to be justified on the basis of objective criteria, such as, in the present case, long growing seasons and crops with high nitrogen uptake. On 8 December 2005, the Commission adopted Decision 2005/880/EC (2) allowing the Netherlands the application of 250 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from livestock manure in farms with at least 70 % grassland.(2) The derogation thus granted concerned approximately 25 000 farms in the Netherlands and approximately 900 000 hectares and applied to the period 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2009. The derogation was granted because:(a) the Dutch legislation implementing Directive 91/676/EEC included application standards both for nitrogen and phosphate and application standards related to phosphate aimed to achieve an equilibrium in phosphate fertilisation by 2015;(b) the Netherlands addressed the issue of nutrient surplus from manure and mineral fertilisers through several policy instruments and in the period 1992 to 2002 decreased cattle numbers by 17 %, pigs by 14 % and sheep and goats by 21 %. Nitrogen and phosphorus in manure decreased respectively by 29 and 34 % in the period 1985 to 2002. Nitrogen and phosphorus surpluses decreased respectively by 25 and 37 %, in the period 1992 to 2002;(c) the available water quality data showed a downwards trend in groundwater nitrate concentration and in nutrient concentration (including phosphorus) in surface water;(d) the technical and scientific documents presented in the Dutch notification showed that the proposed amount of 250 kg per hectare per year nitrogen from cattle manure in farms with at least 70 % grassland was compatible with the achievement of the level of 11,3 mg/l N (corresponding to 50 mg/l NO3) in water in all soil types, and to approximately a zero phosphorus surplus, under conditions of optimal management;(e) the technical and scientific documents presented showed that the proposed amount of 250 kg per hectare per year nitrogen from cattle manure in farms with at least 70 % grassland was justified on the basis of objective criteria such as long growing season and crops with high nitrogen uptake.(3) The Commission considered therefore that the amount of manure requested by the Netherlands would not prejudice the achievement of the objectives of Directive 91/676/EEC, subject to certain strict conditions being met. These conditions included the establishment of fertiliser plans on a farm by farm basis, the recording of fertiliser practices through fertiliser accounts, periodic soil analysis, green cover in winter after maize, specific provisions on grass ploughing, no manure application before grass ploughing and adjustment of fertilisation to take into account the contribution of leguminous crops. These provisions were aimed at ensuring fertilisation based on crop needs and reduction and prevention of nitrogen losses to water.(4) In order to avoid that the application of the 2006-2009 derogation granted by Decision 2005/880/EC would lead to intensification, the competent authorities were compelled to ensure that manure production both in terms of nitrogen and phosphorus would not increase beyond the level of the year 2002 in accordance with the Dutch third national action programme.(5) The Netherlands have communicated the maps and reports referred to in Article 8 and Article 10 of Decision 2005/880/EC in time.(6) On 14 July 2009 the Netherlands submitted to the Commission a request for an extension of the derogation. The request referred to a detailed justification and to the approval of fourth Nitrates Action Programme (2010-2013) by the Dutch House of Representatives. This fourth action programme indicates the (considerable) progress made in line with the conditions of the 2006-2009 derogation and the challenges ahead. It builds further on the third action programme and contains reinforced measures including stricter nitrogen application standards on sandy soils; stricter phosphorus application standards based on the soil phosphorus status and longer closed periods for land application of fertilisers (3). These legal measures aim at a further reduction of nutrient surplus and further improvement of water quality, if need be by further reinforced action beyond the period 2010-2013.(7) Water quality shows a further downward trend in groundwater nitrate concentration and in nutrient concentration (including phosphorus) in surface water with main effects of the third action programme still to be expected in the upcoming years.(8) Results of monitoring and controls show that, in the period 2006-2009 approximately 24 000 grassland farms corresponding to approximately 830 000 ha of cultivated land were encompassed by the derogation.(9) In order to avoid that the application of the requested derogation leads to intensification, the competent authorities should continue to ensure that manure production both in terms of nitrogen and phosphorus does not increase the level of the year 2002.(10) The results achieved so far by the Netherlands are in line with the conditions set out in Decision 2005/880/EC.(11) The necessary legal framework for implementing Directive 91/676/EEC and executing the fourth action programme has been adopted and applies equally to the requested derogation.(12) Given the measures the Netherlands have committed themselves to in the action programme for the period 2010-2013 the Commission considers that the amount of manure requested by the Netherlands for the period 2010-2013 would not prejudice the achievement of the objectives of Directive 91/676/EEC if the same strict conditions established by Decision 2005/880/EC are met.(13) Decision 2005/880/EC expires on 31 December 2009.(14) For the purpose of ensuring that the cattle farms concerned may continue to benefit from a derogation, it is appropriate to extend the validity of Decision 2005/880/EC to 31 December 2013 under the same conditions as those set out in articles 4 to 10 of Decision 2005/880/EC.(15) The deadline for reporting to the Commission, set by Article 10 of Decision 2005/880/EC, should however be adapted and aligned with the deadline for reporting obligations under article 8 of Decision 2005/880/EC.(16) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Nitrates Committee set up pursuant to Article 9 of Directive 91/676/EEC,. Decision 2005/880/EC is amended as follows:1. Article 1 is replaced by the following:2. Article 10, paragraph 1, second subparagraph is replaced by the following:3. Article 11 is replaced by the following: This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of The Netherlands.. Done at Brussels, 5 February 2010.For the CommissionStavros DIMASMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 375, 31.12.1991, p. 1.(2)  OJ L 324, 10.12.2005, p. 89.(3)  Act of 26 November 2009 amending the Fertiliser Act, (Staatsblad Koninkrijk der Nederlanden 2009, 551); Government Order of 9 November 2009 amending the government order on fertiliser use and the Government Order on greenhouse horticulture (Staatsblad Koninkrijk der Nederlanden 2009, 477); Government order of 14 December 2009 amending Government Order on implementation Fertiliser Act (Staatsblad Koninkrijk der Nederlanden 2009, 601); Order of the Minister of Agriculture, Nature and Food Safety of 15 December 2009, amending the implementation regulation Fertiliser Act (Staatscourant Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, 30 December 2009, 20342).
+",Netherlands;Holland;Kingdom of the Netherlands;water pollution;pollution from agricultural sources;environmental protection;conservation of nature;nature protection;preservation of the environment;protection of nature;chemical salt;ammonia;ammonium;bromide;chloride;hydroxide;iodide;lithium hydroxide;nitrate;potassium chloride;soda;sodium carbonate;sulphate;derogation from EU law;derogation from Community law;derogation from European Union law;fertiliser;fertilizer,28
+38085,"2010/746/EU: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2009/030 NL/Drenthe Division 18 from the Netherlands). ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (1), and in particular point 28 thereof,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2), and in particular Article 12(3) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,Whereas:(1) The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established to provide additional support for workers made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.(2) The scope of the EGF was broadened for applications submitted from 1 May 2009 to include support for workers made redundant as a direct result of the global financial and economic crisis.(3) The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the EGF within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million.(4) The Netherlands submitted an application on 30 December 2009 to mobilise the EGF, in respect of redundancies in two enterprises operating in the NACE Revision 2 Division 18 (printing and reproduction of recorded media) in the NUTS II region Drenthe (NL13) and supplemented it with additional information up to 6 May 2010. This application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions as laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The Commission, therefore, proposes to mobilise an amount of EUR 453 632.(5) The EGF should, therefore, be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution for the application submitted by the Netherlands,. For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2010, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 453 632 in commitment and payment appropriations. This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.. Done at Strasbourg, 24 November 2010.For the European ParliamentThe PresidentJ. BUZEKFor the CouncilThe PresidentO. CHASTEL(1)  OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.(2)  OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 1.
+",financial management;dismissal;firing;Netherlands;Holland;Kingdom of the Netherlands;reintegration into working life;professional reintegration;reintegration into the labour market;return to employment;return to the labour market;interinstitutional agreement;budgetary discipline (EU);EC budgetary discipline;globalisation;economic globalisation;economic globalization;globalisation of economic activity;globalisation of the economy;globalization;internationalisation of economic activity;internationalization of economic activity;EU aid;Community aid;Community support;European Union aid;aid from the EU;aid from the European Union,28
+5711,"Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 675/2013 of 15 July 2013 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Pomodoro di Pachino (PGI)]. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,Whereas:(1) Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).(2) In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission has examined Italy’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Pomodoro di Pachino’ registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 617/2003 (3).(3) Since the amendments in question are not minor, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (4), as required by Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006. As no statement of objection under Article 7 of that Regulation has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,. The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved. This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 15 July 2013.For the Commission, On behalf of the President,Dacian CIOLOȘMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.(2)  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.(3)  OJ L 89, 5.4.2003, p. 3.(4)  OJ C 308, 12.10.2012, p. 17.ANNEXAgricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processedITALYPomodoro di Pachino (PGI)
+",Italy;Italian Republic;fruit vegetable;aubergine;capsicum;courgette;cucumber;gherkin;marrow;melon;paprika;pimiento;pumpkin;red pepper;sweet pepper;tomato;designation of origin;PDO;PGI;certificate of designation of origin;protected designation of origin;protected geographical indication;registered designation of origin;product designation;product description;product identification;product naming;substance identification,28
+5647,"Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 352/2013 of 17 April 2013 on the issue of licences for the import of garlic in the subperiod from 1 June 2013 to 31 August 2013. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,Whereas:(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 341/2007 (3) opens and provides for the administration of tariff quotas and introduces a system of import licences and certificates of origin for garlic and other agricultural products imported from third countries.(2) The quantities for which ‘A’ licence applications have been lodged by traditional importers and by new importers during the first seven working days of April 2013, pursuant to Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 341/2007 exceed the quantities available for products originating in China.(3) Therefore, in accordance with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006, it is now necessary to establish the extent to which the ‘A’ licence applications sent to the Commission by 14 April 2013 can be met in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 341/2007.(4) In order to ensure sound management of the procedure of issuing import licences, the present Regulation should enter into force immediately after its publication,. Applications for ‘A’ import licences lodged pursuant to Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 341/2007 during the first seven working days of April 2013 and sent to the Commission by 14 April 2013 shall be met at a percentage rate of the quantities applied for as set out in the Annex to this Regulation. This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 17 April 2013.For the Commission, On behalf of the President,Jerzy PLEWADirector-General for Agriculture and Rural Development(1)  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.(3)  OJ L 90, 30.3.2007, p. 12.ANNEXOrigin Order number Allocation coefficientArgentina— Traditional importers— New importersChina— Traditional importers— New importersOther third countries— Traditional importers— New importers‘X’: No quota for this origin for the subperiod in question.
+",bulb vegetable;garlic;onion;scallion;shallot;tariff quota;administration of tariff quota;allocation of tariff quota;opening of tariff quota;quota at a reduced level of duty;zero-duty quota;import licence;import authorisation;import certificate;import permit;common organisation of markets;CMO;Single CMO;common market organisation;common organization of markets;single common market organisation;third country;Argentina;Argentine Republic;import (EU);Community import;China;People’s Republic of China,28
+38081,"2010/740/EU: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2009/024 NL/Noord Holland and Zuid Holland Division 58 from the Netherlands). ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (1), and in particular point 28 thereof,Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2), and in particular Article 12(3) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,Whereas:(1) The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established to provide additional support for workers made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.(2) The scope of the EGF was broadened for applications submitted from 1 May 2009 to include support for workers made redundant as a direct result of the global financial and economic crisis.(3) The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the EGF within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million.(4) The Netherlands submitted an application on 30 December 2009 to mobilise the EGF, in respect of redundancies in eight enterprises operating in NACE Revision 2 Division 58 (publishing activities) in the two contiguous NUTS II regions Noord Holland (NL32) and Zuid Holland (NL33) and supplemented it with additional information up to 31 May 2010. This application complies with the requirements for determining the financial contributions as laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The Commission, therefore, proposes to mobilise an amount of EUR 2 326 459.(5) The EGF should, therefore, be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution for the application submitted by the Netherlands,. For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2010, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 2 326 459 in commitment and payment appropriations. This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.. Done at Strasbourg, 24 November 2010.For the European ParliamentThe PresidentJ. BUZEKFor the CouncilThe PresidentO. CHASTEL(1)  OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.(2)  OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 1.
+",financial management;dismissal;firing;Netherlands;Holland;Kingdom of the Netherlands;reintegration into working life;professional reintegration;reintegration into the labour market;return to employment;return to the labour market;interinstitutional agreement;budgetary discipline (EU);EC budgetary discipline;globalisation;economic globalisation;economic globalization;globalisation of economic activity;globalisation of the economy;globalization;internationalisation of economic activity;internationalization of economic activity;EU aid;Community aid;Community support;European Union aid;aid from the EU;aid from the European Union,28
+43186,"2014/48/EU: Council Decision of 28 January 2014 on the conclusion of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community, on the one hand, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland, on the other hand. ,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43, in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,Whereas:(1) On 28 June 2007, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 753/2007 (1) concerning the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland (2) (‘the Agreement’). A Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Agreement (3) (the ‘current Protocol’) was attached thereto. The current Protocol will expire on 31 December 2012.(2) The Union has negotiated with the Government of Denmark and the Government of Greenland a new Protocol to the Agreement setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution (‘the Protocol’).(3) The Protocol was signed in accordance with Council Decision 2012/653/EU (4) subject to its conclusion at a later date, and is to be provisionally applied from 1 January 2013.(4) The Protocol should be approved,. The Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community, on the one hand, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland, on the other hand, is hereby approved on behalf of the Union (5). The President of the Council shall give, on behalf of the Union, the notification provided for in Article 13 of the Protocol. This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.. Done at Brussels, 28 January 2014.For the CouncilThe PresidentG. STOURNARAS(1)  OJ L 172, 30.6.2007, p. 1.(2)  OJ L 172, 30.6.2007, p. 4.(3)  OJ L 172, 30.6.2007, p. 9.(4)  OJ L 293, 23.10.2012, p. 4.(5)  The text of the Protocol has been published in OJ L 293, 23.10.2012, p. 5, together with the decision on signature.
+",Greenland;agreement (EU);EC agreement;EC third country convention;EU-third country agreement;European Union agreement;international agreement (EU);Atlantic Ocean;Atlantic;Atlantic Region;Gulf Stream;sea fishing;fishing agreement;protocol to an agreement;catch quota;catch plan;fishing plan;ratification of an agreement;conclusion of an agreement;Denmark;Kingdom of Denmark;fishing area;fishing limits;fishing rights;catch limits;fishing ban;fishing restriction;financial compensation of an agreement,28
+4139,"Commission Regulation (EC) No 1460/2005 of 8 September 2005 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 747/2001 as regards Community tariff quotas and reference quantities for certain products originating in Algeria. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 747/2001 of 9 April 2001 providing for the management of Community tariff quotas and of reference quantities for products eligible for preferences by virtue of agreements with certain Mediterranean countries and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1981/94 and (EC) No 934/95 (1), and in particular Article 5(1)(b) thereof,Whereas:(1) By its Decision of 18 July 2005 (2), the Council approved the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria, of the other part.(2) That Agreement provides, for certain products originating in Algeria, for tariff concessions that apply within the limits of Community tariff quotas and in the framework of reference quantities.(3) To implement the tariff quotas and reference quantities, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EC) No 747/2001.(4) Because Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3590/85 of 18 December 1985 on the certificate and analysis report required for the importation of wine, grape juice and grape must (3) was repealed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2001 of 24 April 2001 laying down detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 as regards trade with third countries in products in the wine sector (4), the reference in Regulation (EC) No 747/2001 to Regulation (EEC) No 3590/85 should, for reasons of clarity, be replaced by a new reference to Regulation (EC) No 883/2001.(5) For the year 2005 the volumes of the new tariff quotas should be calculated as a pro rata of the basic volumes specified in the Agreement, in proportion to the part of the period elapsed before the date of entry into force of the Agreement.(6) In order to facilitate the management for the year 2005 of the two tariff quotas already existing in Regulation (EC) No 747/2001 for wines originating in Algeria, the quantities imported within the framework of those quotas should be charged against the corresponding tariff quotas opened in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 747/2001, as amended by this Regulation.(7) Since the Agreement applies from 1 September 2005, this Regulation should apply from the same date.(8) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,. Regulation (EC) No 747/2001 is amended as follows:1. Article 3(1) is replaced by the following text:2. Annex I is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation. For the year 2005, the volumes of the Community tariff quotas for which the quota period starts before the date of entry into force of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, of the other part, except for the volumes of the tariff quotas for wines with order numbers 09.1001 and 09.1003, shall be reduced in proportion to the part of the period which elapsed before that date. This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.It shall apply with effect from 1 September 2005.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 8 September 2005.For the CommissionLászló KOVÁCSMember of the Commission(1)  OJ L 109, 19.4.2001, p. 2. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 503/2005 (OJ L 83, 1.4.2005, p. 13).(2)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.(3)  OJ L 343, 20.12.1985, p. 20.(4)  OJ L 128, 10.5.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 908/2004 (OJ L 163, 30.4.2004, p. 56).ANNEX‘ANNEX IALGERIANotwithstanding the rules for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature, the wording for the description of the products is to be considered as having no more than an indicative value, the preferential scheme being determined, within the context of this Annex, by the coverage of the CN codes as they exist at the time of adoption of this Regulation. Where ex CN codes are indicated, the preferential scheme is to be determined by application of the CN code and corresponding description taken together.PART A:Tariff quotasOrder No CN code TARIC sub-division Description of goods Quota period Quota volume Quota duty09.1002 0409 00 00  Natural honey from 1.1. to 31.12. 100 Exemption09.1004 0603  Cut flowers and flower buds of a kind suitable for bouquets or for ornamental purposes, fresh, dried, dyed, bleached, impregnated or otherwise prepared from 1.1. to 31.12. 100 Exemption09.1005 0604  Foliage, branches and other parts of plants, without flowers or flower buds, and grasses, mosses and lichens, being goods of a kind suitable for bouquets or for ornamental purposes, fresh, dried, dyed, bleached, impregnated or otherwise prepared from 1.1. to 31.12. 100 Exemption09.1006 ex 0701 90 50  New potatoes, fresh or chilled from 1.1. to 31.3. 5 000 Exemption09.1007 0809 10 00  Apricots, fresh from 1.1. to 31.12. 1 000 Exemption (1)09.1008 0810 10 00  Strawberries, fresh from 1.11. to 31.3. 500 Exemption09.1009 1509  Olive oil and its fractions, whether or not refined, but not chemically modified from 1.1. to 31.12. 1 000 Exemption1510 00  Other oils and their fractions, obtained solely from olives, whether or not refined, but not chemically modified, including blends of these oils or fractions with oils or fractions of heading 150909.1010 ex 1512 19 90 10 Refined sunflower-seed oil from 1.1. to 31.12. 25 000 Exemption09.1011 2002 10 10  Peeled tomatoes, prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid from 1.1. to 31.12. 300 Exemption09.1012 2002 90 31  Tomatoes prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, other than whole or in pieces, with a dry matter content of not less than 12 % by weight from 1.1. to 31.12. 300 Exemption09.1013 2009 50  Tomato juice from 1.1. to 31.12. 200 Exemption09.1014 ex 2009 80 35 40, 91 Apricot juice from 1.1. to 31.12. 200 Exemption (1)ex 2009 80 38 93, 97ex 2009 80 79 40, 80ex 2009 80 86 50, 80ex 2009 80 89 50, 80ex 2009 80 99 15, 9209.1001 ex 2204 21 79 71 Wines entitled to one of the following designations of origin: Aïn Bessem-Bouira, Médéa, Coteaux du Zaccar, Dahra, Coteaux de Mascara, Monts du Tessalah, Coteaux de Tlemcen, of an actual alcoholic strength by volume not exceeding 15 % vol, in containers holding 2 l or less from 1.1. to 31.12. 224 000 hl Exemptionex 2204 21 80 71ex 2204 21 84 51ex 2204 21 85 7109.1003 2204 10 19  Other sparkling wine from 1.1. to 31.12. 224 000 hl Exemption2204 21 10  Other wine of fresh grapesex 2204 21 80 712204 21 84ex 2204 21 85 71ex 2204 21 94 20ex 2204 21 98 20ex 2204 21 99 10ex 2204 29 75 10ex 2204 29 84 20ex 2204 29 94 20ex 2204 29 98 20ex 2204 29 99 10PART B:Reference quantitiesOrder No CN code TARIC sub-division Description of goods Reference quantity period Reference quantity volume Reference quantity duty18.0410 0704 10 00  Cauliflowers and headed broccoli, fresh or chilled from 1.1. to 14.4. and from 1.12. to 31.12. 1 000 Exemption0704 20 00  Brussels sprouts, fresh or chilled from 1.1. to 31.12.0704 90  Other cabbages, kohlrabi, kale and similar edible brassicas, fresh or chilled from 1.1. to 31.12.18.0420 0709 52 00  Truffles, fresh or chilled from 1.1. to 31.12. 100 Exemption18.0430 ex 2005 10 00 10 Homogenised asparagus, carrots and mixtures of vegetables, prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen from 1.1. to 31.12. 200 Exemption18.0440 ex 2005 10 00 30 Other homogenised vegetables, prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen, other than asparagus, carrots and mixtures of vegetables from 1.1. to 31.12. 200 Exemption18.0450 2005 51 00  Beans, shelled, prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen from 1.1. to 31.12. 200 Exemption18.0460 2005 60 00  Asparagus, prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen from 1.1. to 31.12. 200 Exemption18.0470 2005 90 50  Globe artichokes, prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen from 1.1. to 31.12. 200 Exemption18.0480 2005 90 60  Carrots, prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen from 1.1. to 31.12. 200 Exemption18.0490 2005 90 70  Mixtures of vegetables, prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen from 1.1. to 31.12. 200 Exemption18.0500 2005 90 80  Other vegetables, prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen from 1.1. to 31.12. 200 Exemption18.0510 2007 91 90  Jams, fruit jellies, marmalades, purées and pastes, obtained by cooking of citrus fruit, with a sugar content not exceeding 13 % by weight, other than homogenised preparations from 1.1. to 31.12. 200 Exemption18.0520 2007 99 91  Apple purée, including compotes, with a sugar content not exceeding 13 % by weight from 1.1. to 31.12. 200 Exemption18.0530 2007 99 98  Jams, fruit jellies, marmalades, purées and pastes, obtained by cooking of other fruit, with a sugar content not exceeding 13 % by weight, other than homogenised preparations from 1.1. to 31.12. 200 Exemption’(1)  The exemption applies only to the ad valorem duty.
+",Algeria;People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria;tariff quota;administration of tariff quota;allocation of tariff quota;opening of tariff quota;quota at a reduced level of duty;zero-duty quota;agricultural product;farm product;originating product;origin of goods;product origin;rule of origin;designation of origin;PDO;PGI;certificate of designation of origin;protected designation of origin;protected geographical indication;registered designation of origin;wine;tariff agreement;Union for the Mediterranean;Barcelona Process;Euro-Mediterranean partnership;Euromed;UfM,28
+16454,"97/842/EC: Commission Decision of 3 December 1997 concerning a request for exemption submitted by Germany pursuant to Article 8 (2) (c) of Council Directive 70/156/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers (Only the German text is authentic). ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers (1), as last amended by European Parliament and Council Directive 97/27/EC (2), and in particular Article 8 (2) (c) thereof,Whereas the request submitted by Germany on 2 May 1997, which was received by the Commission on 12 May 1997, was accompanied by a report containing the information required by Article 8 (2) (c); whereas the request concerns one type of gas discharge lamp for one type of headlamp for one type of motor vehicle;Whereas the information provided by Germany shows that the technology and principle embodied in this new type of gas discharge lamp and headlamp do not meet the requirements of Community regulations; whereas, however, the descriptions of the tests, the results thereof and the action taken in order to ensure road safety are satisfactory and ensure a level of safety equivalent to that of the lamps and headlamps covered by the requirements of the Directives in force and, in particular, of Council Directive 76/761/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to motor-vehicle headlamps which function as main-beam and/or dipped-beam headlamps and to incandescent electric filament lamps for such headlamps (3), as last amended by Commission Directive 89/517/EEC (4);Whereas this new type of gas discharge lamp and this new type of headlamp meet the requirements of UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) Regulations Nos 8, 98 and 99; whereas it is therefore justified to allow the three items covered by the request for exemption, i.e. the type of gas discharge lamp, the type of headlamp fitted with this type of lamp and the type of motor vehicle, to benefit from the granting of EC type-approval on condition that the type of vehicle concerned is equipped with an automatic headlamp levelling system, a headlamp cleaning device and a system guaranteeing that dipped-beam headlamps are lit even if the main-beam headlamps are lit;Whereas the Community directives concerned will be amended in order to enable gas discharge lamps embodying this new technology, headlamps fitted with such lamps and motor vehicles equipped with such headlamps to be placed on the market;Whereas the measure provided for in this Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Adaptation to Technical Progress set up by Directive 70/156/EEC,. The request submitted by Germany for an exemption concerning one type of gas discharge lamp for one type of headlamp for one type of motor vehicle is hereby approved on condition that the vehicle type concerned is equipped with an automatic headlamp levelling system, a headlamp cleaning device and a system guaranteeing that dipped-beam headlamps are lit even if the main-beam headlamps are lit. This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.. Done at Brussels, 3 December 1997.For the CommissionMartin BANGEMANNMember of the Commission(1) OJ L 42, 23. 2. 1970, p. 1.(2) OJ L 233, 25. 8. 1997, p. 1.(3) OJ L 262, 27. 9. 1976, p. 96.(4) OJ L 265, 12. 9. 1989, p. 15.
+",Germany;FRG;Federal Republic of Germany;German Federal Republic;West Germany;approximation of laws;legislative harmonisation;motor vehicle;commercial vehicle;juggernaut;lorry;lorry tanker;trailer;truck;signalling device;anti-dazzle headlamp;audible warning device;dipped-beam headlamp;fog lamp;light;lighting system;main-beam headlamp;side marker lamp;stop lamp;vehicle signals;derogation from EU law;derogation from Community law;derogation from European Union law,28
+28852,"Commission Regulation (EC) No 1679/2004 of 27 September 2004 fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 of 21 December 1987 fixing conditions for the application of preferential customs duties on imports of certain flowers originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (1), and in particular Article 5(2)(a) thereof,Whereas:Pursuant to Article 2(2) and Article 3 of abovementioned Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87, Community import and producer prices are fixed each fortnight for uniflorous (bloom) carnations, multiflorous (spray) carnations, large-flowered roses and small-flowered roses and apply for two-weekly periods. Pursuant to Article 1b of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 700/88 of 17 March 1988 laying down detailed rules for the application of the arrangements for the import into the Community of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (2), those prices are determined for fortnightly periods on the basis of weighted prices provided by the Member States. Those prices should be fixed immediately so the customs duties applicable can be determined. To that end, provision should be made for this Regulation to enter into force immediately,. The Community producer and import prices for uniflorous (bloom) carnations, multiflorous (spray) carnations, large-flowered roses and small-flowered roses as referred to in Article 1b of Regulation (EEC) No 700/88 for a fortnightly period shall be as set out in the Annex. This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 September 2004.It shall apply from 29 September to 12 October 2004.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 27 September 2004.For the CommissionJ. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZAgriculture Director-General(1)  OJ L 382, 31.12.1987, p. 22. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1300/97 (OJ L 177, 5.7.1997, p. 1).(2)  OJ L 72, 18.3.1988, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2062/97 (OJ L 289, 22.10.1997, p. 1).ANNEXto the Commission Regulation of 27 September 2004 fixing Community producer and import prices for carnations and roses with a view to the application of the arrangements governing imports of certain floricultural products originating in Cyprus, Israel, Jordan, Morocco and the West Bank and the Gaza Strip(EUR/100 pieces)Period: from 29 September to 12 October 2004Community producer price Uniflorous (bloom) Multiflorous (spray) Large-flowered roses Small-flowered roses13,60 9,66 25,50 10,49Community import prices Uniflorous (bloom) Multiflorous (spray) Large-flowered roses Small-flowered rosesIsrael — — — —Morocco — — — —Cyprus — — — —Jordan — — — —West Bank and Gaza Strip — — — —
+",floriculture;flower;flower-growing;Israel;State of Israel;Jordan;Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan;Morocco;Kingdom of Morocco;import price;entry price;producer price;average producer price;output price;originating product;origin of goods;product origin;rule of origin;Palestine;East Jerusalem;Gaza strip;Occupied Palestinian Territory;West Bank;autonomous territories of Palestine;autonomous territory of Gaza;autonomous territory of Jericho;Cyprus;Republic of Cyprus,28
+34392,"Commission Regulation (EC) No 813/2007 of 11 July 2007 setting the allocation coefficient for issuing of licences applied for from 2 to 6 July 2007 to import sugar products under tariff quotas and preferential agreements. ,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 of 28 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the 2006/07, 2007/08 and 2008/09 marketing years for importing and refining of sugar products under certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements (2), and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,Whereas:(1) Applications for import licences were submitted to the competent authority during the week of 2 to 6 July 2007, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 or Commission Regulation (EC) No 1832/2006 of 13 December 2006 laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania (3) for a total quantity equal to or exceeding the quantity available for serial number 09.4343 (2006 to 2007).(2) In these circumstances, the Commission should fix an allocation coefficient in order to issue licences in proportion to the quantity available and inform the Member States that the set limit has been reached,. Licences shall be issued within the quantitative limits set in the Annex to this Regulation in respect of applications for import licences submitted from 2 to 6 July 2007, in accordance with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006 or Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1832/2006. This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.. Done at Brussels, 11 July 2007.For the CommissionJean-Luc DEMARTYDirector-General for Agriculture and Rural Development(1)  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.(2)  OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2006/2006 (OJ L 379, 28.12.2006, p. 95).(3)  OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 8.ANNEXACP-India Preferential SugarTitle IV of Regulation (EC) No 950/20062006/2007 marketing yearSerial No Country Week of 2.7.2007-6.7.2007: % of requested quantity to be granted Limit09.4331 Barbados 10009.4332 Belize 10009.4333 Côte d’Ivoire 0 Reached09.4334 Republic of the Congo 0 Reached09.4335 Fiji 10009.4336 Guyana 10009.4337 India 0 Reached09.4338 Jamaica 10009.4339 Kenya 0 Reached09.4340 Madagascar 0 Reached09.4341 Malawi 10009.4342 Mauritius 10009.4343 Mozambique 100 Reached09.4344 Saint Kitts and Nevis —09.4345 Suriname —09.4346 Swaziland 10009.4347 Tanzania 0 Reached09.4348 Trinidad and Tobago 0 Reached09.4349 Uganda —09.4350 Zambia 10009.4351 Zimbabwe 100ACP-India Preferential SugarTitle IV of Regulation (EC) No 950/20062007/2008 marketing yearSerial No Country Week of 2.7.2007-6.7.2007: % of requested quantity to be granted Limit09.4331 Barbados 10009.4332 Belize 10009.4333 Côte d’Ivoire 10009.4334 Republic of the Congo 10009.4335 Fiji 10009.4336 Guyana 10009.4337 India 0 Reached09.4338 Jamaica 10009.4339 Kenya 10009.4340 Madagascar 10009.4341 Malawi 10009.4342 Mauritius 10009.4343 Mozambique 10009.4344 Saint Kitts and Nevis —09.4345 Suriname —09.4346 Swaziland 10009.4347 Tanzania 10009.4348 Trinidad and Tobago 10009.4349 Uganda —09.4350 Zambia 10009.4351 Zimbabwe 100Complementary SugarTitle V of Regulation (EC) No 950/20062006/2007 marketing yearSerial No Country Week of 2.7.2007-6.7.2007: % of requested quantity to be granted Limit09.4315 India 10009.4316 ACP Protocol signatory countries 100CXL Concessions SugarTitle VI of Regulation (EC) No 950/20062006/2007 marketing yearSerial No Country Week of 2.7.2007-6.7.2007: % of requested quantity to be granted Limit09.4317 Australia 0 Reached09.4318 Brazil 0 Reached09.4319 Cuba 0 Reached09.4320 Other third countries 0 ReachedBalkans sugarTitle VII of Regulation (EC) No 950/20062006/2007 marketing yearSerial No Country Week of 2.7.2007-6.7.2007: % of requested quantity to be granted Limit09.4324 Albania 10009.4325 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 Reached09.4326 Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo 10009.4327 Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 10009.4328 Croatia 100Exceptional import sugar and industrial import sugarTitle VIII of Regulation (EC) No 950/20062006/2007 Marketing yearSerial No Type Week of 2.7.2007-6.7.2007: % of requested quantity to be granted Limit09.4380 Exceptional —09.4390 Industrial 100Import of sugar under the transitional tariff quotas opened for Bulgaria and RomaniaChapter 1 Section 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1832/20062006/2007 marketing yearOrder No Type Week of 2.7.2007-6.7.2007: % of requested quantity to be granted Limit09.4365 Bulgaria 0 Reached09.4366 Romania 0 Reached
+",marketing;marketing campaign;marketing policy;marketing structure;sugar industry;sugar manufacture;sugar refinery;tariff quota;administration of tariff quota;allocation of tariff quota;opening of tariff quota;quota at a reduced level of duty;zero-duty quota;import licence;import authorisation;import certificate;import permit;transitional period (EU);EC limited period;EC transitional measures;EC transitional period;transition period (EU);sugar refining;quantitative restriction;quantitative ceiling;quota;preferential agreement;preferential trade agreement,28