Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
model
stringclasses
8 values
architecture
stringclasses
4 values
params_b
float64
20.9
79.7
quant
stringclasses
4 values
size_gib
float64
10.8
24.9
engine
stringclasses
1 value
backend
stringclasses
1 value
gpu
stringclasses
1 value
vram_gb
int64
32
32
test
stringclasses
15 values
tokens_per_sec
float64
10.4
16.7k
stddev
float64
0.03
323
date
stringdate
2026-05-28 00:00:00
2026-05-29 00:00:00
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.61
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp128
3,605.03
48.69
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.61
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp512
9,239.86
63.85
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.61
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp2048
9,041.04
65.96
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.61
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp4096
8,760.53
53.07
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.61
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp8192
8,442.99
37.16
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.61
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp16384
7,713.79
15.46
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.61
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
tg128
270.97
1.24
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q4_K_M
15.66
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp128
2,972.93
322.84
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q4_K_M
15.66
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp512
3,825.83
41.56
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q4_K_M
15.66
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp2048
3,740.84
1.29
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q4_K_M
15.66
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp4096
3,644.93
2.76
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q4_K_M
15.66
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp8192
3,484.57
7.2
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q4_K_M
15.66
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp16384
3,161.79
3.66
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q4_K_M
15.66
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
tg128
77.09
0.16
2026-05-28
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
22.88
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp128
4,423.05
74.78
2026-05-28
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
22.88
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp512
10,674.44
108.43
2026-05-28
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
22.88
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp2048
10,277.54
40.85
2026-05-28
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
22.88
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp4096
9,999.48
26.46
2026-05-28
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
22.88
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp8192
9,448.36
34.02
2026-05-28
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
22.88
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp16384
8,558.68
16.72
2026-05-28
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
22.88
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
tg128
363.69
1.58
2026-05-28
gpt-oss-20b
Dense
20.91
Q4_K_M
10.81
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp128
7,220.69
67.12
2026-05-28
gpt-oss-20b
Dense
20.91
Q4_K_M
10.81
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp512
16,749.65
148.73
2026-05-28
gpt-oss-20b
Dense
20.91
Q4_K_M
10.81
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp2048
13,524.44
12.42
2026-05-28
gpt-oss-20b
Dense
20.91
Q4_K_M
10.81
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp4096
11,684.53
43.99
2026-05-28
gpt-oss-20b
Dense
20.91
Q4_K_M
10.81
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp8192
9,413.7
16.38
2026-05-28
gpt-oss-20b
Dense
20.91
Q4_K_M
10.81
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp16384
6,677.6
14.13
2026-05-28
gpt-oss-20b
Dense
20.91
Q4_K_M
10.81
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
tg128
367.9
1.18
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B-MTP
Dense (MTP)
27.32
Q4_K_M
15.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp128
2,972.2
321.87
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B-MTP
Dense (MTP)
27.32
Q4_K_M
15.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp512
3,835.77
43.26
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B-MTP
Dense (MTP)
27.32
Q4_K_M
15.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp2048
3,746.68
1.53
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B-MTP
Dense (MTP)
27.32
Q4_K_M
15.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp4096
3,655.53
9.44
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B-MTP
Dense (MTP)
27.32
Q4_K_M
15.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp8192
3,495.59
4.04
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B-MTP
Dense (MTP)
27.32
Q4_K_M
15.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp16384
3,161.77
3.81
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B-MTP
Dense (MTP)
27.32
Q4_K_M
15.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
tg128
76.99
0.09
2026-05-28
Qwen3-Coder-Next
MoE
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp128
2,381.32
29.12
2026-05-28
Qwen3-Coder-Next
MoE
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp512
4,447.3
39.42
2026-05-28
Qwen3-Coder-Next
MoE
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp2048
4,420.86
35.94
2026-05-28
Qwen3-Coder-Next
MoE
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp4096
4,380.75
11.49
2026-05-28
Qwen3-Coder-Next
MoE
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp8192
4,250.74
14.71
2026-05-28
Qwen3-Coder-Next
MoE
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp16384
4,042.73
18.93
2026-05-28
Qwen3-Coder-Next
MoE
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
tg128
224.87
1.86
2026-05-28
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q6_K
20.97
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp128
2,560.42
230.77
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q6_K
20.97
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp512
3,190.61
32.25
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q6_K
20.97
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp2048
3,152.9
10.03
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q6_K
20.97
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp4096
3,078.76
3.62
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q6_K
20.97
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp8192
2,955.62
2.05
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q6_K
20.97
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp16384
2,725.3
0.79
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q6_K
20.97
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
tg128
61.8
0.07
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q6_K
20.97
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
mmlu
87.92
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q6_K
20.97
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
arc_challenge
96.93
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q6_K
20.97
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
hellaswag
95.44
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q6_K
20.97
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
gsm8k
97.27
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-27B
Dense
26.9
Q6_K
20.97
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
humaneval
18.9
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.6
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp128
3,588.75
45.29
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.6
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp512
9,208.09
51.75
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.6
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp2048
9,014.19
41.42
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.6
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp4096
8,729.84
65.53
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.6
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp8192
8,362.15
25.66
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.6
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp16384
7,622.86
23.6
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.6
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
tg128
270.9
1.47
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.6
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
mmlu
84.99
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.6
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
arc_challenge
95.73
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.6
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
hellaswag
93.35
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.6
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
gsm8k
96.66
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
34.66
UD-Q4_K_M
20.6
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
humaneval
37.2
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Dense
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp128
2,377.56
29.85
2026-05-29
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Dense
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp512
4,433.02
39.13
2026-05-29
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Dense
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp2048
4,416.98
17.75
2026-05-29
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Dense
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp4096
4,372.29
6.73
2026-05-29
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Dense
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp8192
4,253.72
18.44
2026-05-29
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Dense
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp16384
4,022.08
7.21
2026-05-29
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Dense
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
tg128
224.6
1.71
2026-05-29
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Dense
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
mmlu
83.69
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Dense
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
arc_challenge
95.99
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Dense
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
hellaswag
89.32
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Dense
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
gsm8k
95.98
null
2026-05-29
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Dense
79.67
UD-Q2_K_XL
24.92
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
humaneval
10.37
null
2026-05-29
gemma-4-31B-it
Dense
30.7
Q6_K
23.46
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp128
2,485.54
170.26
2026-05-29
gemma-4-31B-it
Dense
30.7
Q6_K
23.46
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp512
2,932.28
29.73
2026-05-29
gemma-4-31B-it
Dense
30.7
Q6_K
23.46
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp2048
2,750.74
2.4
2026-05-29
gemma-4-31B-it
Dense
30.7
Q6_K
23.46
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp4096
2,656.91
1.64
2026-05-29
gemma-4-31B-it
Dense
30.7
Q6_K
23.46
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp8192
2,520.26
2.56
2026-05-29
gemma-4-31B-it
Dense
30.7
Q6_K
23.46
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp16384
2,315.5
3.13
2026-05-29
gemma-4-31B-it
Dense
30.7
Q6_K
23.46
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
tg128
52.84
0.03
2026-05-29
gemma-4-31B-it
Dense
30.7
Q6_K
23.46
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
mmlu
87.82
null
2026-05-29
gemma-4-31B-it
Dense
30.7
Q6_K
23.46
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
arc_challenge
97.61
null
2026-05-29
gemma-4-31B-it
Dense
30.7
Q6_K
23.46
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
hellaswag
91.95
null
2026-05-29
gemma-4-31B-it
Dense
30.7
Q6_K
23.46
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
gsm8k
97.5
null
2026-05-29
gemma-4-31B-it
Dense
30.7
Q6_K
23.46
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
humaneval
95.73
null
2026-05-29
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
23.02
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp128
4,396.99
23.71
2026-05-29
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
23.02
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp512
10,646.68
83.38
2026-05-29
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
23.02
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp2048
10,338.38
32.81
2026-05-29
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
23.02
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp4096
10,029.01
24.97
2026-05-29
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
23.02
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp8192
9,508
20.63
2026-05-29
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
23.02
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
pp16384
8,580.44
9.8
2026-05-29
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
23.02
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
tg128
350.84
1.4
2026-05-29
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
23.02
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
mmlu
74.42
null
2026-05-29
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
23.02
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
arc_challenge
91.55
null
2026-05-29
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B
MoE (3B active)
31.58
Q4_K_M
23.02
llama.cpp
CUDA
RTX 5090
32
hellaswag
75.68
null
2026-05-29
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

RTX 5090 LLM Benchmarks

Speed and quality benchmarks for quantized LLMs on NVIDIA RTX 5090 32GB, measured with llm-bench-rig.

Quality Benchmarks

Generative evaluation through llama-server chat completions. Replicates standard benchmark methodology using custom evaluators — no lm-evaluation-harness dependency.

Model Params Quant MMLU ARC-C HellaSwag GSM8K HumanEval
Gemma 4 31B-it 30.70B Q6_K 87.8 97.6 92.0 97.5 95.7
Qwen3.6-27B 26.90B Q6_K 87.9 96.9 95.4 97.3 18.9
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 34.66B UD-Q4_K_M 85.0 95.7 93.4 96.7 37.2
Qwen3-Coder-Next 79.67B UD-Q2_K_XL 83.7 96.0 89.3 96.0 10.4
Nemotron-Cascade-2 31.58B Q4_K_M 74.4 91.5 75.7 87.1 79.3
gpt-oss-20b 20.91B Q4_K_M 78.6 94.6 74.5 94.8 12.2

All models benchmarked with 50% stratified sampling (seed=42), thinking disabled. Full per-model reports in reports/.

Methodology

Benchmark Dataset Few-shot Scoring Items
MMLU cais/mmlu 5-shot Letter extraction (A/B/C/D) 14,042
ARC-Challenge allenai/ai2_arc 25-shot Letter extraction 1,172
HellaSwag Rowan/hellaswag 10-shot Letter extraction 10,042
GSM8K openai/gsm8k 5-shot CoT Exact numeric match 1,319
HumanEval openai/openai_humaneval 0-shot pass@1 (code execution) 164

All benchmarks run at temperature=0 with max_tokens=2048 (accommodates thinking/reasoning models). Multiple-choice tasks use generative letter extraction instead of loglikelihood scoring — scores are internally consistent for model comparison but may differ from logprob-based evaluations by 5-15%.

Full per-model reports with MMLU category breakdowns, parse reliability stats, and speed data: reports/


Speed Benchmarks

What's measured

  • Prompt processing (pp): parallel batched token throughput at context lengths 128, 512, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16384
  • Text generation (tg): sequential autoregressive token throughput at 128 tokens
  • All models fully GPU-offloaded (ngl=99)

Speed data schema

Column Description
model Model name
architecture Dense or MoE (with active param count)
params_b Total parameters in billions
quant Quantization method
size_gib File size in GiB
engine Inference engine (llama.cpp or vLLM)
backend Compute backend (CUDA)
gpu GPU model
vram_gb VRAM in GB
test Benchmark test (pp128, pp512, ..., tg128)
tokens_per_sec Throughput in tokens/second
stddev Standard deviation
date Benchmark date

Key findings

MoE (3B active) vs Dense (27B) on same-family Qwen3.6 models:

  • Prompt processing: 2.4x faster across all context lengths
  • Text generation: 3.5x faster (271 vs 77 t/s)
  • Both degrade ~17% at 16K context (attention + VRAM, not parameter count)

Hardware

Component Spec
GPU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 32GB (Blackwell, sm_120a)
CPU AMD Ryzen 5 9600 (6c/12t)
RAM 64GB DDR5-5600
OS Ubuntu 26.04 LTS
CUDA 12.8 (patched for glibc 2.41)

Tooling

All benchmarks generated with llm-bench-rig — open-source pipeline for speed and quality benchmarks on GGUF and safetensors models.

Downloads last month
60

Collection including witcheer/rtx-5090-benchmarks