witcheer commited on
Commit
5ee9704
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): b4a2634

Upload reports/gpt-oss-20b-q4-k-m.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. reports/gpt-oss-20b-q4-k-m.md +169 -0
reports/gpt-oss-20b-q4-k-m.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Benchmark Report: gpt-oss-20b (Q4_K_M)
2
+
3
+ **Date:** 2026-05-28
4
+ **Author:** WITCHEER
5
+ **Platform:** RTX 5090 Benchmark Rig (capsule)
6
+
7
+ ---
8
+
9
+ ## Model
10
+
11
+ | Field | Value |
12
+ |-------|-------|
13
+ | Model | gpt-oss-20b |
14
+ | Parameters | 20.91B (dense) |
15
+ | Quantization | Q4_K_M |
16
+ | File size | 10.83 GiB |
17
+ | Engine | llama.cpp (CUDA 12.8, sm_120) |
18
+
19
+ ## Hardware
20
+
21
+ | Component | Spec |
22
+ |-----------|------|
23
+ | GPU | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 (32 GB GDDR7) |
24
+ | CPU | AMD Ryzen 5 9600 (6c/12t, 3.8/5.2 GHz) |
25
+ | RAM | 64 GB DDR5-5600 |
26
+ | OS | Ubuntu Server 26.04 LTS (headless) |
27
+ | CUDA | 12.8 (patched for glibc 2.41 compat) |
28
+
29
+ ---
30
+
31
+ ## Quality Benchmarks
32
+
33
+ All benchmarks use generative evaluation via llama-server chat completions. Multiple-choice tasks (MMLU, ARC, HellaSwag) use letter extraction instead of loglikelihood scoring — results are internally consistent for model comparison but absolute scores may differ from logprob-based evaluations by 5–15%.
34
+
35
+ ### Summary
36
+
37
+ | Benchmark | Score | Metric | Correct / Total | Time |
38
+ |-----------|------:|--------|----------------:|-----:|
39
+ | **MMLU** (5-shot) | **78.56%** | accuracy | 11,031 / 14,042 | 3h 49m |
40
+ | **ARC-Challenge** (25-shot) | **94.62%** | accuracy | 1,109 / 1,172 | 10m 40s |
41
+ | **HellaSwag** (10-shot) | **74.49%** | accuracy | 7,480 / 10,042 | 3h 31m |
42
+ | **GSM8K** (5-shot, CoT) | **94.77%** | exact match | 1,250 / 1,319 | 22m 0s |
43
+ | **HumanEval** (0-shot) | **12.20%** | pass@1 | 20 / 164 | 2m 48s |
44
+
45
+ **Total evaluation time:** 7h 56m
46
+
47
+ ### MMLU Breakdown by Category
48
+
49
+ | Category | Score | Correct / Total |
50
+ |----------|------:|----------------:|
51
+ | STEM | 89.83% | 2,711 / 3,018 |
52
+ | Social Sciences | 84.45% | 2,796 / 3,311 |
53
+ | Humanities | 77.45% | 2,456 / 3,171 |
54
+ | Other | 67.55% | 3,068 / 4,542 |
55
+
56
+ **Top 5 subjects:**
57
+
58
+ | Subject | Score |
59
+ |---------|------:|
60
+ | High School Computer Science | 99.0% |
61
+ | Elementary Mathematics | 96.8% |
62
+ | College Physics | 95.1% |
63
+ | High School Mathematics | 93.7% |
64
+ | College Biology | 92.4% |
65
+
66
+ **Bottom 5 subjects:**
67
+
68
+ | Subject | Score |
69
+ |---------|------:|
70
+ | Professional Law | 44.3% |
71
+ | Global Facts | 47.0% |
72
+ | Virology | 59.0% |
73
+ | Moral Disputes | 67.9% |
74
+ | Philosophy | 68.8% |
75
+
76
+ ### Parse Reliability
77
+
78
+ The model uses extended reasoning (`reasoning_content` field) before responding. With `max_tokens=2048`, most reasoning chains complete successfully.
79
+
80
+ | Benchmark | Parse Failures | Failure Rate |
81
+ |-----------|---------------:|-------------:|
82
+ | MMLU | 653 | 4.6% |
83
+ | ARC-Challenge | 5 | 0.4% |
84
+ | HellaSwag | 37 | 0.4% |
85
+ | GSM8K | 0 | 0.0% |
86
+ | **Total** | **695** | **2.6%** |
87
+
88
+ Parse failures are scored as incorrect. The majority occur in MMLU subjects with long reasoning chains (professional_law, moral_scenarios) where the model's thinking exceeds the token budget.
89
+
90
+ ---
91
+
92
+ ## Speed Benchmarks
93
+
94
+ Measured with `llama-bench`. All layers GPU-offloaded (`-ngl 99`).
95
+
96
+ ### Prompt Processing (tokens/s)
97
+
98
+ | Context Length | Speed | ±σ |
99
+ |---------------:|------:|---:|
100
+ | 128 | 7,221 | 67 |
101
+ | 512 | 16,750 | 149 |
102
+ | 2,048 | 13,524 | 12 |
103
+ | 4,096 | 11,685 | 44 |
104
+ | 8,192 | 9,414 | 16 |
105
+ | 16,384 | 6,678 | 14 |
106
+
107
+ ### Generation (tokens/s)
108
+
109
+ | Metric | Speed | ±σ |
110
+ |--------|------:|---:|
111
+ | tg128 | 367.9 | 1.2 |
112
+
113
+ ### Context Degradation
114
+
115
+ Prompt processing peaks at 512 tokens (16,750 t/s) then drops 60% at 16K context (6,678 t/s). This is the steepest degradation of any model in the rig — characteristic of smaller dense models with limited KV-cache efficiency.
116
+
117
+ ---
118
+
119
+ ## Methodology
120
+
121
+ ### Evaluation Framework
122
+
123
+ Custom generative evaluators built for this rig. No dependency on `lm-evaluation-harness` — all benchmarks run through llama-server's `/v1/chat/completions` endpoint.
124
+
125
+ | Benchmark | Dataset | Eval Split | Few-shot | Scoring |
126
+ |-----------|---------|-----------|----------|---------|
127
+ | MMLU | `cais/mmlu` | test (14,042) | 5-shot per subject from `dev` | First valid A/B/C/D letter extracted from response |
128
+ | ARC-Challenge | `allenai/ai2_arc` | test (1,172) | 25-shot from `train` | First valid letter, numeric labels normalized to A–D |
129
+ | HellaSwag | `Rowan/hellaswag` | validation (10,042) | 10-shot from `train` | First valid A/B/C/D letter |
130
+ | GSM8K | `openai/gsm8k` | test (1,319) | 5-shot CoT from `train` | Exact match on extracted numeric answer |
131
+ | HumanEval | `openai/openai_humaneval` | test (164) | 0-shot | pass@1 via subprocess execution (10s timeout) |
132
+
133
+ ### Inference Configuration
134
+
135
+ - **Server:** llama-server (llama.cpp, CUDA 12.8, Blackwell sm_120)
136
+ - **Temperature:** 0 (deterministic)
137
+ - **Max tokens:** 2,048 (accommodates reasoning models)
138
+ - **GPU offload:** All layers (`-ngl 99`)
139
+ - **Serving:** Single request, sequential (no batching)
140
+
141
+ ### Differences from Standard Benchmarks
142
+
143
+ - **Generative vs loglikelihood:** MMLU, ARC, and HellaSwag are traditionally scored using token logprobabilities. This rig uses generative letter extraction, which typically yields scores 5–15% lower on the same model. Rankings between models remain consistent.
144
+ - **Thinking models:** gpt-oss-20b produces extended reasoning in a separate `reasoning_content` field. When the primary `content` field is empty, the evaluator falls back to parsing the reasoning chain for the final answer.
145
+ - **No normalized accuracy:** Standard HellaSwag reporting uses `acc_norm` (length-normalized). This rig reports raw accuracy, which may be lower for completions of varying length.
146
+
147
+ ---
148
+
149
+ ## Reproduction
150
+
151
+ ```bash
152
+ # On capsule (192.168.1.9)
153
+ cd ~/benchmark-rig && source venv/bin/activate
154
+
155
+ # Full benchmark (speed + quality)
156
+ python3 bench.py /path/to/gpt-oss-20b-Q4_K_M.gguf
157
+
158
+ # Quality only
159
+ python3 bench.py /path/to/gpt-oss-20b-Q4_K_M.gguf --quality-only
160
+
161
+ # Individual evaluator
162
+ python3 -m lib.evals.mmlu --api-base http://127.0.0.1:8090/v1 --model gpt-oss-20b
163
+ ```
164
+
165
+ All results, detailed per-subject breakdowns, and checkpoint files are stored in `results/gpt-oss-20b-q4-k-m/`.
166
+
167
+ ---
168
+
169
+ *Benchmarked by WITCHEER on the RTX 5090 Benchmark Rig. Source: [github.com/notwitcheer/llm-bench-rig](https://github.com/notwitcheer/llm-bench-rig). Dataset: [huggingface.co/datasets/witcheer/rtx-5090-benchmarks](https://huggingface.co/datasets/witcheer/rtx-5090-benchmarks).*