Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
image
imagewidth (px)
724
1.83k
Low_GPTCaption
stringclasses
10 values
Medium_GPTCaption
stringclasses
10 values
High_GPTCaption
stringclasses
10 values
The figure consists of two comparative bar charts (labeled A and B) showing bacterial family composition, with the x-axis labeled “Bacterial families” and the y-axis labeled “Abundance (Reads)” on a logarithmic scale with tick marks at 1, 10, 100, 1000, 10000, and 100000. Each panel displays 14 gray bars, one per famil...
The figure consists of two bar charts (A and B) comparing bacterial family abundances based on read counts. Both plots have a logarithmic y-axis labeled “Abundance (Reads)” spanning 1 to 1,000,000, and an x-axis labeled “Bacterial families” listing specific families. Panel A shows the distribution for one group, with M...
The figure comprises two logarithmic bar charts (labeled A and B) showing bacterial family composition, with the y-axis labeled “Abundance (Reads)” (ticks at 1, 10, 100, 1000, 10000, 100000, 1000000) and the x-axis labeled “Bacterial families.” In panel A, bars (left to right) correspond to Mycoplasmataceae, Flavobacte...
The figure comprises two quantitative plots. Panel A displays force–distance measurements with a corrected separation axis: the y-axis is Force (nN) and the x-axis is D + Rq (nm). Multiple datasets, identified in the legend by surface roughness Rq (5, 10, 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 26 nm), are shown as colored markers...
The figure presents two quantitative plots related to electrostatic double-layer interactions measured on nanostructured TiO2 (ns‑TiO2) surfaces. Panel A is a force–distance graph showing average interaction forces (y-axis: Force [nN], ranging approximately from −0.05 to 0.35 nN) as a function of corrected separation (...
The figure presents two scientific plots. A: Force–distance curves measured at nanostructured TiO2 (ns‑TiO2) surfaces, with the horizontal axis labeled “D + Rq (nm)” spanning approximately 20–100 nm and the vertical axis labeled “Force (nN)” ranging from about −0.05 to 0.30 nN. Nine datasets are shown with scatter poin...
The figure is a schematic diagram illustrating the synthesis and microstructure of a composite solid electrolyte. At the top left, chemical structures labeled “s@LLAZO nanofiber” and “PEGDA” are shown with red arrows pointing to reactive vinyl groups. An arrow labeled “AIBN (0.1 wt.%) Initiator,” “LiTFSI ([EO]/[Li+]=12...
The figure is a schematic diagram illustrating the synthesis and structure of a composite solid electrolyte and its application in an all‑solid‑state Li‑ion battery. At the upper left, chemical structures labeled “s@LLAZO nanofiber” and “PEGDA” are shown, with red arrows indicating reactive vinyl groups (–CH2=CH–). An ...
This figure is a schematic/chemical reaction diagram illustrating the fabrication and structure of a composite solid electrolyte. At the top left, “s@LLAZO nanofiber” and “PEGDA” monomer structures are shown with red arrows marking reactive vinyl/acrylate groups. A horizontal reaction arrow specifies the conditions “AI...
The figure combines microscopy, spectroscopy, electrochemical, and mechanical data. Panels (a–e) are TEM images (each with a 5 nm scale bar) of nanofibers: (a,b) show sharp crystalline lattice fringes at the fiber edge, while (c–e) display a core–shell morphology highlighted by red dashed lines, with a crystalline core...
Composite multipanel figure combining microscopy, spectroscopy, transport, and mechanical data. Panels (a–e) are high‑resolution TEM images (each with a 5 nm scale bar) of nanofibers labeled LLAZO (a) and silane‑modified s@LLAZO treated for 3 h (b), 6 h (c), 12 h (d), and 24 h (e); the images show crystalline lattices ...
Multi-panel figure combining TEM, XPS, transport, and mechanical data. Panels (a–e) are high‑resolution TEM images of nanofibers (each with a 5 nm scale bar): (a) shows a clean, sharp crystalline edge; (b) a uniform surface; (c–e) display a lighter-contrast amorphous shell delineated by red dashed lines along the fiber...
Composite multipanel figure combining a photograph and electrochemical plots. (a) Digital image showing an off‑white, flexible solid electrolyte membrane (s@LLAZO(6h)‑50PEGDA) bent while held by tweezers against a patterned background. (b) Linear sweep voltammetry: Current (mA) vs Potential (V vs Li/Li+) from 3.0 to 5....
Composite multipanel figure combining a photographic image and electrochemical plots. (a) Digital photograph of a freestanding, flexible solid electrolyte membrane labeled s@LLAZO(6h)-50PEGDA, shown bent with tweezers over a patterned background, indicating uniform, opaque white film form. (b) Linear sweep voltammetry ...
This is a four‑panel figure comprising a photograph and three electrochemical plots. (a) Digital image of a flexible, freestanding white membrane strip held by tweezers; the strip is bent without cracking. (b) Linear sweep voltammetry: Current (mA) vs Potential (V vs Li/Li+), 3.0–5.5 V. Three traces are labeled in the ...
The figure comprises six electrochemical performance plots. (a) Nyquist electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) at 25 °C for three composite solid electrolytes, plotted as −Z'' (Ω cm^2) versus Z' (Ω cm^2) up to ~800 Ω cm^2, with legends s@LLAZO(6h)-70PEGDA (red circles), s@LLAZO(6h)-50PEGDA (blue squares), and s@LLAZO(...
The figure comprises six electrochemical data panels for lithium cells. (a) Nyquist impedance plots (−Z″ vs Z′, units Ω cm²) at 25 °C compare three solid electrolytes: s@LLAZO(6h)-70PEGDA (red circles), s@LLAZO(6h)-50PEGDA (blue squares), and s@LLAZO(6h)-30PEGDA (green triangles). All show a high-frequency partial semi...
The figure presents multi-panel electrochemical data for all-solid-state cells. (a) Nyquist EIS plots at 25 °C (−Z'' vs Z', units Ω cm^2) compare s@LLAZO(6h)-70PEGDA (red circles), s@LLAZO(6h)-50PEGDA (blue squares), and s@LLAZO(6h)-30PEGDA (green triangles), showing semicircles of increasing diameter from 70 to 30 PEG...
The figure is a schematic workflow diagram for dynamic light scattering microrheology. It comprises three stages labeled at the top: “Mix tracer particles,” “Perform DLS,” and “Extract rheological properties.” In the first stage, “Tracer particles (<0.5% w/v)” are combined with a “Polymer solution or gel precursor” and...
Schematic workflow diagram for microrheology by dynamic light scattering (DLS). The left panel shows sample preparation: tracer particles labeled “< 0.5% w/v” are mixed with a “Polymer solution or gel precursor” and loaded into a “Low volume (12 μL) cuvette.” The central panel depicts measurement: a benchtop instrument...
The figure is a schematic workflow diagram for dynamic light scattering microrheology. It shows three stages: (1) “Mix tracer particles,” where tracer particles (<0.5% w/v) are combined with a “Polymer solution or gel precursor” and loaded into a “Low volume (12 μL) cuvette”; (2) “Perform DLS,” depicting a benchtop DLS...
The figure combines a log–log rheological plot and displacement/trajectory maps. Top: a double-logarithmic graph of the magnitude of the shear modulus, |G*| (Pa), versus angular frequency, ω (s^-1), comparing “micro” (red circles) and “macro” (blue circles) measurements across series labeled 3%, 4%, 5%, and 10%. The x-...
The figure combines a log–log rheological plot and tracer trajectory visualizations. Top panel: a scatter plot of the magnitude of shear modulus |G*| (Pa) versus angular frequency ω (s⁻¹), with the y-axis spanning 10⁰ to 10⁵ Pa and the x-axis spanning 10⁻¹ to 10⁶ s⁻¹. Four horizontally separated data bands correspond t...
The figure combines a rheology plot and particle-displacement maps. Top: a log–log plot of the magnitude of the shear modulus |G*| (Pa) versus angular frequency ω (s^-1), with |G*| spanning 10^0–10^5 Pa on the y-axis and ω spanning 10^-1–10^6 s^-1 on the x-axis. Data are shown for four gel formulations annotated “3%,” ...
The figure combines a frequency-dependent rheology plot with schematic illustrations to depict distinct relaxation regimes. Top: a log–log plot of the complex shear modulus (y-axis: “G* − iηω (Pa)”, 10^−2 to 10^4 Pa) versus angular frequency (x-axis: “ω (s^−1)”, 10^0 to 10^6 s^−1) shows red filled circles for G′ and re...
The figure combines a log–log rheological plot and illustrative schematics. Top panel: a viscoelastic frequency sweep showing complex shear modulus G* = G′ − iωη (units: Pa) versus angular frequency ω (s−1) for a semidilute DNA solution. The vertical axis spans 10−2 to 104 Pa; the horizontal axis spans 100 to 106 s−1. ...
The figure combines a log–log rheology plot with schematic illustrations to depict frequency-dependent viscoelastic behavior. Top panel: The vertical axis is labeled G* − iηω (Pa) spanning 10^−2 to 10^4 Pa, and the horizontal axis is angular frequency ω (s^−1) spanning 10^0 to 10^6 s^−1. Three frequency regions are ind...
The figure is a multi-panel composite comprising rheological spectra, schematic cartoons, and fluorescence micrographs. Top-left: a log–log plot of complex shear modulus G* (Pa) versus angular frequency ω (s⁻¹) for intestinal mucus, with red and blue solid curves for G′ and G″, respectively, each with semi-transparent ...
The figure comprises two logarithmic rheological plots, schematic cartoons, and confocal micrographs. Top left is a log–log plot of complex shear modulus G* (Pa) versus angular frequency ω (s⁻¹) for intestinal mucus from healthy mice, with G′ (red) and G″ (blue) shown as mean curves with shaded confidence bands. The y-...
The figure combines rheological spectra, schematics, and fluorescence micrographs. Top left: a log–log plot of the complex shear modulus versus angular frequency for intestinal mucus, with the y axis labeled G* (Pa) spanning 10^0–10^3 and the x axis labeled ω (s^-1) spanning 10^-1–10^5. Red and blue curves show the sto...
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
4