id string | topic string | difficulty int64 | problem_statement string | solution_paths list | reconciliation dict | error_catalogue list | conceptual_takeaway string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
math-015801 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Indicate where a theorem is used: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-6&-3&5\\-3&0&6\\-1&4&2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods m... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{84}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both method... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015802 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Problem: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-5&-3&-3\\-6&3&-6\\-5&-6&6\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-261}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both meth... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015803 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Provide both a computational and a conceptual explanation: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}5&2&3\\6&-1&1\\-6&3&2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explai... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-25}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must y... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015804 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Checkpoint: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-2&0&4\\-3&4&3\\-4&3&5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using ... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{6}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yie... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015805 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Problem: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}3&-3&1\\3&-2&-1\\4&1&-4\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using ro... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{14}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015806 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Answer with a short justification: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}0&2&-3\\-4&2&-4\\1&2&2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods m... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{38}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both method... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015807 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Solve and justify each step: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-1&4&-2\\6&6&5\\2&6&3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agr... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-68}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both metho... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015808 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Exercise: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-2&1&6\\-3&-6&4\\-3&3&-6\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using ... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-240}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same nu... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015809 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Give a theorem-based solution: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}6&2&6\\-5&-4&-4\\5&6&3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must ... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{2}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same numbe... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{2}$.) |
math-015810 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Carefully track domains: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}0&-5&-4\\5&0&-5\\1&-4&-2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agre... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{55}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{55}$.) |
math-015811 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Answer with a short justification: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}1&-2&-3\\5&-5&2\\3&-2&-5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-48}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-48}$.) |
math-015812 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Solve and then verify: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-3&4&-4\\6&0&1\\2&2&-2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{14}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yi... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015813 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Explain what is being counted/optimized: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}1&-3&3\\-3&-4&5\\5&-5&-3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two m... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{94}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same numb... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{94}$.) |
math-015814 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Checkpoint: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}4&5&2\\2&-2&-2\\-6&-1&-3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When usin... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{78}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both method... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015815 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Provide a rigorous solution: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-2&-5&-2\\-3&-1&-6\\5&-1&0\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mus... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{146}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015816 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Solve (and briefly cross-validate): Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-1&-3&5\\-1&-1&4\\-4&6&-5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two metho... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{32}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same numb... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{32}$.) |
math-015817 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Show all reasoning: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}1&0&2\\-3&-3&1\\-4&0&0\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
Whe... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-24}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-24}$.) |
math-015818 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Solve and then verify: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}6&0&-5\\6&0&-2\\-5&6&1\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-108}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must ... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015819 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Track units/moduli carefully: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}0&5&-5\\-5&3&0\\-5&-2&2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must ... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-75}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must y... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-75}$.) |
math-015820 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Solve and justify each step: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}6&-6&2\\-1&0&4\\3&-1&-1\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must a... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-40}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-40}$.) |
math-015821 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Do not skip justification steps: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}3&3&2\\0&-1&1\\-6&-6&-2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mu... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-6}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yi... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-6}$.) |
math-015822 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Try to avoid pattern-matching; explain why: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}1&3&-3\\1&1&-1\\-3&6&-5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-2}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-2}$.) |
math-015823 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Try to avoid pattern-matching; explain why: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-1&2&4\\-1&2&-2\\-1&2&1\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{0}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015824 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Checkpoint: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}5&2&0\\6&-4&-4\\2&1&-3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using ... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{100}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both metho... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{100}$.) |
math-015825 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Start by stating any domain restrictions: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}5&0&-6\\-6&-3&-3\\0&5&0\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two m... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{255}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must y... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{255}$.) |
math-015826 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Work this out carefully: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-2&-1&-2\\4&3&2\\2&6&-1\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-14}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-14}$.) |
math-015827 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Give a fully justified solution: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-1&5&-3\\-5&4&-1\\0&5&3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mu... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{133}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015828 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Use two approaches if possible: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-5&4&-6\\-4&-5&6\\5&4&6\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mus... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{432}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{432}$.) |
math-015829 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Checkpoint: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-3&4&-5\\4&5&-3\\-2&4&-2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When usin... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-80}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must y... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-80}$.) |
math-015830 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Keep the final answer in boxed form: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-3&1&1\\3&4&0\\-2&3&-4\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{77}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same numb... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015831 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Question: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}6&1&-2\\1&2&6\\2&1&4\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using row ... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{26}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yi... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015832 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Explain each transformation: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}6&5&-2\\-6&5&1\\1&1&1\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agr... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{81}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yi... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015833 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Where appropriate, name the theorem you use: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}4&0&6\\-5&5&-4\\-5&3&-3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the tw... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{48}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yi... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015834 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Explain each transformation: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}1&-1&5\\-5&-1&1\\-1&-3&-1\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{80}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yi... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015835 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Question: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}3&-5&2\\-6&-1&5\\2&-6&2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using r... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{50}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same numb... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015836 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Explain what is being counted/optimized: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-4&-3&3\\2&-4&-2\\-1&-3&0\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two ... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-12}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015837 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Challenge: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-1&2&3\\-3&2&-3\\6&6&-1\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using ... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-148}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both meth... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015838 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Determine the requested value: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-3&-4&6\\0&-5&-6\\6&1&0\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{306}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{306}$.) |
math-015839 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Warm-up: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-5&-2&3\\-6&3&-4\\-5&-4&-2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{211}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both metho... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015840 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Solve and include a self-check: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-4&1&-3\\0&4&5\\-6&1&0\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-82}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both metho... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015841 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Write the solution set clearly: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}0&6&-6\\4&-2&4\\5&6&-1\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-60}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both metho... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015842 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Determine the requested value: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}2&0&-3\\-2&1&1\\6&6&1\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must a... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{44}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same numb... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{44}$.) |
math-015843 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Derive the result step-by-step: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-4&-5&-6\\-4&0&3\\2&2&5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mus... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-58}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must y... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015844 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Complete the analysis: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-3&-5&-2\\-2&-5&0\\-3&5&4\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{70}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yi... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015845 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Write the solution set clearly: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-6&6&5\\-3&-6&-3\\-4&-3&-5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods ... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-219}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same nu... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015846 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Exercise: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}0&-3&6\\0&6&-1\\1&-4&6\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using ro... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-33}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must y... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-33}$.) |
math-015847 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Track quantifiers carefully: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}4&-3&-5\\5&1&4\\-5&-4&-6\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must ... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{85}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{85}$.) |
math-015848 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Proceed methodically: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}6&6&-4\\2&3&3\\5&-1&3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
Wh... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{194}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must y... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{194}$.) |
math-015849 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Proceed methodically: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-6&2&-1\\-2&2&1\\6&1&0\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
W... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{32}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yi... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{32}$.) |
math-015850 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Checkpoint: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}1&4&-2\\3&2&-1\\3&4&-5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using ... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{30}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both method... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015851 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Make each step logically reversible (or explain if not): Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}2&4&-6\\-6&5&2\\3&2&5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain ... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{348}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{348}$.) |
math-015852 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Solve (and briefly cross-validate): Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}3&-5&-4\\-2&0&-2\\-4&-4&4\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two metho... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-136}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same nu... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015853 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Derive the result step-by-step: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}3&4&-5\\6&3&6\\-3&-4&0\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{75}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yi... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{75}$.) |
math-015854 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Give a fully justified solution: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}4&-5&-5\\6&-2&-6\\-3&-5&-2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-74}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015855 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Use two approaches if possible: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}2&4&4\\4&-4&2\\-3&-5&5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-252}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number."... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-252}$.) |
math-015856 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Give an answer and a quick verification: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-2&5&0\\0&-2&1\\6&-1&-4\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two me... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{12}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yi... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{12}$.) |
math-015857 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Track quantifiers carefully: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}6&1&-2\\-1&-3&-1\\0&6&4\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must a... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-20}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both metho... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-20}$.) |
math-015858 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Determine the requested value: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-6&3&4\\-5&-3&-1\\1&3&-3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mus... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-168}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number."... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-168}$.) |
math-015859 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Warm-up: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}3&-5&3\\0&-3&5\\0&-3&-2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using ro... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{63}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{63}$.) |
math-015860 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | State any required conditions first: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-3&-3&6\\-1&5&5\\3&-2&2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two method... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-189}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number."... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-189}$.) |
math-015861 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Carefully track domains: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-6&-6&-5\\-4&4&1\\-2&6&4\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agre... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-64}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-64}$.) |
math-015862 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Carefully track domains: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}0&-1&-4\\2&-3&-2\\2&-4&-1\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agr... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{10}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both method... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{10}$.) |
math-015863 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Compute the requested quantity: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-1&2&2\\3&-1&-4\\-5&2&-4\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mu... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{54}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both method... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{54}$.) |
math-015864 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Make each step logically reversible (or explain if not): Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}5&3&6\\-1&5&0\\5&-5&5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain ... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{20}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same numb... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{20}$.) |
math-015865 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Solve (and briefly cross-validate): Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-4&-6&1\\-2&-5&3\\-4&5&-5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two metho... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{62}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yi... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015866 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Where appropriate, name the theorem you use: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}5&-1&-1\\-4&4&5\\1&0&3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{47}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015867 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Where appropriate, name the theorem you use: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}2&0&5\\3&4&5\\3&4&-3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two m... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-64}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015868 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Solve and sanity-check: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-3&-4&3\\3&1&-6\\5&-6&0\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{159}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015869 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Try to avoid pattern-matching; explain why: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}2&-1&-3\\5&-5&4\\3&-3&5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-13}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-13}$.) |
math-015870 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Checkpoint: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-3&-5&3\\-4&2&2\\-2&5&3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-76}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both metho... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-76}$.) |
math-015871 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Solve (and briefly cross-validate): Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}5&0&1\\0&6&3\\-6&0&3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mu... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{126}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{126}$.) |
math-015872 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Give a fully justified solution: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-1&3&4\\2&0&-6\\2&-3&5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mus... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-72}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both metho... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-72}$.) |
math-015873 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Provide both a computational and a conceptual explanation: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}6&3&4\\-5&2&5\\4&0&-2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explai... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-26}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both metho... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-26}$.) |
math-015874 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Work carefully and justify each inference: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-2&1&-2\\6&3&-3\\3&-4&-3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{117}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{117}$.) |
math-015875 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Question: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}5&3&-2\\-6&0&-1\\-3&6&-6\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using ... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{3}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yie... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{3}$.) |
math-015876 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Solve and include a self-check: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-2&-5&2\\-5&0&6\\2&-1&-5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mu... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{63}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both method... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{63}$.) |
math-015877 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Explain why your operations are valid: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-6&-5&2\\-1&5&-1\\1&5&6\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two meth... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-255}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must ... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-255}$.) |
math-015878 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Explain each transformation: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-4&4&1\\-4&6&-1\\5&-1&-1\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must ... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-34}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both metho... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-34}$.) |
math-015879 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Solve and include a self-check: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}0&4&2\\-4&2&-5\\2&0&6\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must ... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{48}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015880 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Solve (and briefly cross-validate): Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-4&-6&-4\\-3&-5&1\\5&5&5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two method... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-40}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015881 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Task: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-5&1&-3\\6&-3&-5\\1&4&-2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using row ... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-204}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same nu... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-204}$.) |
math-015882 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Work carefully and justify each inference: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-2&4&1\\-6&5&3\\2&-4&0\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two m... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{14}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015883 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Indicate where a theorem is used: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-6&2&-4\\3&-1&-1\\-4&4&-2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-48}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must y... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015884 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Explain each transformation: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-3&0&4\\3&3&6\\2&0&-5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agr... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{21}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both method... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{21}$.) |
math-015885 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Give reasoning, not just computation: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}6&-4&1\\-6&-1&2\\2&3&-1\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two metho... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-38}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must y... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-38}$.) |
math-015886 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Indicate where a theorem is used: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}0&4&1\\1&6&6\\-6&5&-5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mus... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-83}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both metho... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-83}$.) |
math-015887 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Make each step logically reversible (or explain if not): Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-6&-5&-2\\2&6&4\\-2&-4&5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly expla... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-194}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number."... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-194}$.) |
math-015888 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Problem: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-1&-6&4\\1&2&4\\-5&1&2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using row... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{176}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both metho... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015889 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Task: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-4&5&-1\\-6&-1&-3\\6&5&-3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using row... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-228}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must ... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-228}$.) |
math-015890 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Use two approaches if possible: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}6&-5&2\\5&0&-5\\5&3&2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must ... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{295}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must y... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{295}$.) |
math-015891 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Determine the requested value: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-4&-1&5\\-3&3&-1\\-2&1&-3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mu... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{54}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both method... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{54}$.) |
math-015892 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Solve and include a self-check: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}3&-5&2\\-5&4&1\\-6&-3&4\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mus... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{65}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yi... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{65}$.) |
math-015893 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Solve and then verify: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-3&1&-3\\-2&-1&-5\\-1&2&5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{15}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same numb... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015894 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Track units/moduli carefully: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}6&-5&-3\\1&-4&-1\\4&6&-2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{28}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same number.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Core principle: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{28}$.) |
math-015895 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Answer with a short justification: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-4&1&5\\-1&5&-4\\1&1&2\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods m... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-88}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-88}$.) |
math-015896 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Question: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}4&0&-4\\1&-4&-2\\6&-2&-3\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
When using ... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-56}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must y... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-56}$.) |
math-015897 | Matrix Theory: Determinant Properties | 8 | Try to avoid pattern-matching; explain why: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}-4&-6&2\\6&6&-2\\-1&0&1\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{12}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same numb... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Remember: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. |
math-015898 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cofactor Expansion | 8 | Solve (and briefly cross-validate): Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}1&0&-4\\0&5&-6\\1&-5&-5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods... | [
{
"method_name": "Row Reduction with Determinant Tracking",
"approach": "Use row operations to reach an upper-triangular matrix; the determinant is the product of diagonal entries times the tracked sign/scale factors.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Apply row operations to create zeros below the diagonal.",... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-35}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must y... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-35}$.) |
math-015899 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Cross-Validation | 8 | Solve and include a self-check: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}4&-6&6\\-1&5&-2\\0&5&-5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods mus... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-60}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Takeaway: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-60}$.) |
math-015900 | Linear Algebra: Determinants — Row Operations | 8 | Solve and then verify: Compute the determinant of the matrix
$$A=\begin{pmatrix}6&-4&1\\-4&-1&3\\-6&0&5\end{pmatrix}.$$
(a) Compute $\det(A)$ by cofactor expansion.
(b) Compute $\det(A)$ by row reduction, carefully tracking how row operations affect the determinant.
(c) Briefly explain why the two methods must agree.
... | [
{
"method_name": "Cofactor Expansion",
"approach": "Expand along a convenient row/column to reduce to $2\\times2$ determinants.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Choose a row/column (often one with zeros, if present).",
"Step 2: Compute the signed minors (2×2 determinants) and sum with the checkerboard ... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-44}$.\nCofactor expansion and row-reduction compute the same multilinear alternating function (the determinant). Because the determinant is uniquely characterized by these properties, both methods must yield the same num... | [
{
"error_description": "Forgot the checkerboard signs in cofactor expansion.",
"why_plausible": "The minors are the most visible part and signs are easy to omit.",
"why_wrong": "Cofactors alternate in sign; missing signs changes the determinant.",
"which_method_catches_it": "Row-reduction method pro... | Key idea: Determinants can be computed by expansion or row operations; knowing exactly how each row operation affects $\det$ is essential for correct row-reduction computations. (Here the result is $\boxed{-44}$.) |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.