id string | topic string | difficulty int64 | problem_statement string | solution_paths list | reconciliation dict | error_catalogue list | conceptual_takeaway string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
math-018001 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Work this out carefully: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-565$, and... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-565x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-565$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{2}{11})=\\frac{-1130}{11}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check.... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-565$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-565x$. |
math-018002 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Answer using clear logical steps: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=721$, and that $... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{721x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=721$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(3)=2163$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=721x$.",
"rob... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=721$ fixes the function to $f(x)=721x$. |
math-018003 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Track quantifiers carefully: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-549$,... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-549x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-549$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-3}{2})=\\frac{1647}{2}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both concl... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-549$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-549x$. |
math-018004 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Solve with verification: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-664$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-664x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-664$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-8}{3})=\\frac{5312}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-664x$.",
"... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-664$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-664x$. |
math-018005 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Give an answer and a quick verification: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that ... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-200x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-200$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{2}{11})=\\frac{-400}{11}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. ... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-200$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-200x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-200x}$.) |
math-018006 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Work this out carefully: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=154$, and ... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{154x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=154$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{1}{3})=\\frac{154}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=154x$.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=154$ fixes the function to $f(x)=154x$. |
math-018007 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Complete the analysis: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=408$, and th... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{408x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=408$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{7}{2})=1428$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=408x$.",
"robustnes... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=408$ fixes the function to $f(x)=408x$. |
math-018008 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Explain why your operations are valid: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{335x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=335$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{4}{11})=\\frac{1340}{11}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Bo... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=335$ fixes the function to $f(x)=335x$. |
math-018009 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Checkpoint: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-178$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-18}{1... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-178x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-178$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-3}{2})=267$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-178x$.",
"robustness_a... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-178$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-178x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-178x}$.) |
math-018010 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Start by stating any domain restrictions: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-774x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-774$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{19}{8})=\\frac{-7353}{4}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-774x$... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-774$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-774x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-774x}$.) |
math-018011 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Complete the analysis: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-527$, and that $f\!\left(\... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-527x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-527$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-9}{5})=\\frac{4743}{5}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-527x$.... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-527$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-527x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-527x}$.) |
math-018012 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Determine the requested value: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-732$, and that $f\!\left(... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-732x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-732$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(2)=-1464$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-732x$.",
"robustness_analysis": ... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-732$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-732x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-732x}$.) |
math-018013 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | State any required conditions first: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-130$, and that $f\!\left(... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-130x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-130$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-23}{8})=\\frac{1495}{4}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-130x$... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-130$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-130x$. |
math-018014 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Where appropriate, name the theorem you use: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, t... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-322x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-322$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(8)=-2576$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-322x$.",
"robustness_analy... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-322$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-322x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-322x}$.) |
math-018015 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Keep the final answer in boxed form: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-573x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-573$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-8}{7})=\\frac{4584}{7}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both concl... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-573$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-573x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-573x}$.) |
math-018016 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Derive the result step-by-step: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=676$, and that $f\... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{676x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=676$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-1}{3})=\\frac{-676}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclud... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=676$ fixes the function to $f(x)=676x$. |
math-018017 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Provide a rigorous solution: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-436$, and that $f\!\... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-436x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-436$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{9}{11})=\\frac{-3924}{11}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both con... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-436$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-436x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-436x}$.) |
math-018018 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Provide both a computational and a conceptual explanation: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is contin... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{518x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=518$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-21}{11})=\\frac{-10878}{11}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=518x... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=518$ fixes the function to $f(x)=518x$. |
math-018019 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Track quantifiers carefully: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-29$, and that $f\!\left(\fr... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-29x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-29$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{13}{7})=\\frac{-377}{7}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-29x$.",
"rob... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-29$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-29x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-29x}$.) |
math-018020 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Explain why your operations are valid: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{614x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=614$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{2}{3})=\\frac{1228}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=614$ fixes the function to $f(x)=614x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{614x}$.) |
math-018021 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Work carefully and justify each inference: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-482$, ... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-482x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-482$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-5}{6})=\\frac{1205}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-482x$.",
"... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-482$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-482x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-482x}$.) |
math-018022 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Do not skip justification steps: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-153$, and that $f\!\left(\fra... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-153x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-153$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{14}{5})=\\frac{-2142}{5}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-153x$... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-153$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-153x$. |
math-018023 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Question: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-754$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{21}{5}\right)=\... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-754x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-754$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{21}{5})=\\frac{-15834}{5}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check.... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-754$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-754x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-754x}$.) |
math-018024 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Start by stating any domain restrictions: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-589$, and that $f\!\... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-589x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-589$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-10}{11})=\\frac{5890}{11}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both co... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-589$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-589x$. |
math-018025 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Explain what is being counted/optimized: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that ... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-792x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-792$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-11}{4})=2178$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-792x$.",
"robustness... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-792$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-792x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-792x}$.) |
math-018026 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Solve and justify each step: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=326$, and that $f\!\l... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{326x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=326$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-3}{7})=\\frac{-978}{7}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=326x$.",
"rob... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=326$ fixes the function to $f(x)=326x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{326x}$.) |
math-018027 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Solve and justify each step: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=300$, and that $f\!\l... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{300x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=300$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-4}{3})=-400$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=300x$.",
"robustness_ana... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=300$ fixes the function to $f(x)=300x$. |
math-018028 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Find the exact value: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-277$, and th... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-277x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-277$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-7}{3})=\\frac{1939}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-277x$.",
"... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-277$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-277x$. |
math-018029 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Give a theorem-based solution: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=605$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{1... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{605x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=605$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{14}{11})=770$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=605x$.",
"robustne... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=605$ fixes the function to $f(x)=605x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{605x}$.) |
math-018030 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Task: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-105$, and that $f\!\left(\fr... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-105x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-105$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{1}{11})=\\frac{-105}{11}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-105x$... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-105$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-105x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-105x}$.) |
math-018031 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Exercise: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=616$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-20}{11}\right)=-1120$... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{616x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=616$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-20}{11})=-1120$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=616$ fixes the function to $f(x)=616x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{616x}$.) |
math-018032 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Work this out carefully: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=374$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{374x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=374$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-7}{6})=\\frac{-1309}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=374x$.",... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=374$ fixes the function to $f(x)=374x$. |
math-018033 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Determine the requested value: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=91$,... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{91x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=91$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{19}{8})=\\frac{1729}{8}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude ... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=91$ fixes the function to $f(x)=91x$. |
math-018034 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Prompt: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-350$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-3}{3}\right)=350... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-350x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-350$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(-1)=350$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-350x$.",
"robustness_analysis": "... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-350$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-350x$. |
math-018035 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Find the exact value: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-769$, and that $f\!\left(\f... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-769x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-769$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-2}{7})=\\frac{1538}{7}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. B... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-769$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-769x$. |
math-018036 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Do not skip justification steps: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-43$, and that $f\!\left(\frac... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-43x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-43$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-5}{3})=\\frac{215}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-43$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-43x$. |
math-018037 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Track units/moduli carefully: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=792$,... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{792x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=792$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(-9)=-7128$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=792x$.",
"r... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=792$ fixes the function to $f(x)=792x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{792x}$.) |
math-018038 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Task: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=502$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-25}{11}\right)=\frac{-125... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{502x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=502$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-25}{11})=\\frac{-12550}{11}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both co... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=502$ fixes the function to $f(x)=502x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{502x}$.) |
math-018039 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Answer with a short justification: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-19$, and that $f\!\left(\fr... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-19x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-19$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-15}{11})=\\frac{285}{11}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-19x$."... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-19$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-19x$. |
math-018040 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Solve and sanity-check: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-710$, and ... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-710x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-710$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(-3)=2130$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-71... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-710$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-710x$. |
math-018041 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Start by stating any domain restrictions: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=371$, an... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{371x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=371$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-2}{3})=\\frac{-742}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclud... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=371$ fixes the function to $f(x)=371x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{371x}$.) |
math-018042 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Checkpoint: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-687$, and that $f\!\le... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-687x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-687$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{1}{3})=-229$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-687$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-687x$. |
math-018043 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Use two approaches if possible: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-286$, and that $f\!\left... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-286x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-286$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-23}{5})=\\frac{6578}{5}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. ... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-286$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-286x$. |
math-018044 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Solve (and briefly cross-validate): Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=365$, and that $f\!\l... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{365x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=365$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(2)=730$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=365x$.",
"robustness_analysis": "Robu... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=365$ fixes the function to $f(x)=365x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{365x}$.) |
math-018045 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Provide a rigorous solution: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=790$, ... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{790x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=790$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-13}{2})=-5135$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclud... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=790$ fixes the function to $f(x)=790x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{790x}$.) |
math-018046 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Complete the analysis: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=575$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{25}... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{575x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=575$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{25}{12})=\\frac{14375}{12}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. ... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=575$ fixes the function to $f(x)=575x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{575x}$.) |
math-018047 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Challenge: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-536$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{2}{8}\right)=-134$.
... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-536x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-536$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{1}{4})=-134$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-536$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-536x$. |
math-018048 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Compute the requested quantity: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=342$, and that $f\... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{342x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=342$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-22}{7})=\\frac{-7524}{7}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=342x$."... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=342$ fixes the function to $f(x)=342x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{342x}$.) |
math-018049 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Solve and include a self-check: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=87$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{87x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=87$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-5}{9})=\\frac{-145}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=87x$.",
"... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=87$ fixes the function to $f(x)=87x$. |
math-018050 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Solve (and briefly cross-validate): Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-602$, and that $f\!\... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-602x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-602$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-7}{5})=\\frac{4214}{5}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-602x$.",
"... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-602$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-602x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-602x}$.) |
math-018051 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Work this out carefully: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-156$, and that $f\!\left... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-156x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-156$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{7}{3})=-364$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-156x$.",
"robustness_a... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-156$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-156x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-156x}$.) |
math-018052 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Explain why your operations are valid: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=353$, and that $f\!\left... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{353x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=353$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{17}{4})=\\frac{6001}{4}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclud... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=353$ fixes the function to $f(x)=353x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{353x}$.) |
math-018053 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | State any required conditions first: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=468$, and that $f\!\left(\... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{468x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=468$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(11)=5148$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=468x$.",
"robustness_analysis": "Ge... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=468$ fixes the function to $f(x)=468x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{468x}$.) |
math-018054 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Try to avoid pattern-matching; explain why: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-56$, and that $f\!... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-56x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-56$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-8}{11})=\\frac{448}{11}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-56x$.",... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-56$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-56x$. |
math-018055 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Explain why your operations are valid: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-658$, and that $f... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-658x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-658$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{19}{8})=\\frac{-6251}{4}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-658x$... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-658$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-658x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-658x}$.) |
math-018056 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Solve and then verify: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-728$, and that $f\!\left(\... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-728x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-728$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(2)=-1456$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-728x$.",
"robustness_analysis": ... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-728$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-728x$. |
math-018057 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Solve and justify each step: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-582$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-8... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-582x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-582$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-8}{3})=1552$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-582$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-582x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-582x}$.) |
math-018058 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Derive the result step-by-step: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=441... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{441x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=441$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-1}{3})=-147$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude ... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=441$ fixes the function to $f(x)=441x$. |
math-018059 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Write the solution set clearly: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-48... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-484x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-484$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-25}{3})=\\frac{12100}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-484x$.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-484$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-484x$. |
math-018060 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Answer using clear logical steps: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=158$, and that $f\!\left(\fra... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{158x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=158$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-11}{8})=\\frac{-869}{4}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=158x$.",
"ro... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=158$ fixes the function to $f(x)=158x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{158x}$.) |
math-018061 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Derive the result step-by-step: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=357$, and that $f\!\left(... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{357x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=357$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{3}{8})=\\frac{1071}{8}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=357$ fixes the function to $f(x)=357x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{357x}$.) |
math-018062 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Work this out carefully: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-774$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{23}{6}... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-774x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-774$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{23}{6})=-2967$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-774x$.",
"robustness... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-774$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-774x$. |
math-018063 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Proceed methodically: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=556$, and tha... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{556x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=556$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-15}{7})=\\frac{-8340}{7}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. B... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=556$ fixes the function to $f(x)=556x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{556x}$.) |
math-018064 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Challenge: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=544$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{20}{6}\right)=\frac{5... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{544x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=544$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{10}{3})=\\frac{5440}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=544x$.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=544$ fixes the function to $f(x)=544x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{544x}$.) |
math-018065 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Question: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=388$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-12}{4}\r... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{388x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=388$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(-3)=-1164$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=388x$.",
"r... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=388$ fixes the function to $f(x)=388x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{388x}$.) |
math-018066 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Give a theorem-based solution: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-81$... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-81x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-81$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-7}{8})=\\frac{567}{8}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-81$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-81x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-81x}$.) |
math-018067 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Problem: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-507$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{1}{5}\right)=\fr... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-507x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-507$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{1}{5})=\\frac{-507}{5}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclu... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-507$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-507x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-507x}$.) |
math-018068 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Explain what is being counted/optimized: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that ... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-192x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-192$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{20}{9})=\\frac{-1280}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-192x$.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-192$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-192x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-192x}$.) |
math-018069 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Derive the result step-by-step: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-81$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-81x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-81$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-5}{4})=\\frac{405}{4}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-81$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-81x$. |
math-018070 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Provide both a computational and a conceptual explanation: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, th... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{443x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=443$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-6}{5})=\\frac{-2658}{5}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Bo... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=443$ fixes the function to $f(x)=443x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{443x}$.) |
math-018071 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Explain each transformation: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-360$, and that $f\!\... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-360x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-360$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-3}{4})=270$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-360$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-360x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-360x}$.) |
math-018072 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Warm-up: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-96$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-11}{3}\right)=35... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-96x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-96$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-11}{3})=352$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-96... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-96$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-96x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-96x}$.) |
math-018073 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Work this out carefully: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=760$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{760x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=760$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-1}{3})=\\frac{-760}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclud... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=760$ fixes the function to $f(x)=760x$. |
math-018074 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Proceed methodically: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-696$, and that $f\!\left(\f... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-696x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-696$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-5}{3})=1160$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-696x$.",
"robustness_... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-696$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-696x$. |
math-018075 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Explain each transformation: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-498$,... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-498x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-498$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(-2)=996$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-498x$.",
"... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-498$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-498x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-498x}$.) |
math-018076 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Use two approaches if possible: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=82$, and that $f\!... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{82x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=82$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{17}{4})=\\frac{697}{2}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=82x$.",
"robustn... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=82$ fixes the function to $f(x)=82x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{82x}$.) |
math-018077 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Track units/moduli carefully: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-441$... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-441x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-441$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{1}{3})=-147$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-441$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-441x$. |
math-018078 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | State any required conditions first: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=175$, and that $f\!\... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{175x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=175$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-9}{11})=\\frac{-1575}{11}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=175x$.",
"... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=175$ fixes the function to $f(x)=175x$. |
math-018079 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Do not skip justification steps: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=19$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{19x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=19$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-5}{9})=\\frac{-95}{9}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both c... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=19$ fixes the function to $f(x)=19x$. |
math-018080 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Solve and sanity-check: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-681$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-681x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-681$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-16}{9})=\\frac{3632}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-681x$... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-681$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-681x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-681x}$.) |
math-018081 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Solve and sanity-check: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=425$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-8... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{425x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=425$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-8}{5})=-680$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=425x$.",
"robustne... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=425$ fixes the function to $f(x)=425x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{425x}$.) |
math-018082 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Where appropriate, name the theorem you use: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, t... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{386x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=386$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-9}{8})=\\frac{-1737}{4}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=386x$.",... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=386$ fixes the function to $f(x)=386x$. |
math-018083 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Work carefully and justify each inference: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, tha... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{87x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=87$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-1}{4})=\\frac{-87}{4}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=87$ fixes the function to $f(x)=87x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{87x}$.) |
math-018084 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Work this out carefully: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-799$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-16}{1... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-799x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-799$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-4}{3})=\\frac{3196}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-799x$.... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-799$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-799x$. |
math-018085 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Explain what is being counted/optimized: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-527$, and that $f\!\l... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-527x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-527$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{23}{2})=\\frac{-12121}{2}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-527x$.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-527$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-527x$. |
math-018086 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Warm-up: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-241$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{11}{12}\right)=\frac{-... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-241x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-241$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{11}{12})=\\frac{-2651}{12}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both co... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-241$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-241x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-241x}$.) |
math-018087 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Complete the analysis: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-118$, and that $f\!\left(\... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-118x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-118$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-21}{10})=\\frac{1239}{5}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-118x$.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-118$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-118x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-118x}$.) |
math-018088 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Solve with verification: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=460$, and that $f\!\left(... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{460x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=460$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{7}{2})=1610$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=460x$.",
"robustness_anal... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=460$ fixes the function to $f(x)=460x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{460x}$.) |
math-018089 | Functional Equations: Additivity — Extension from Q to R | 10 | Prompt: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=692$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-3}{12}\right)=-173$.
(... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{692x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=692$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-1}{4})=-173$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=692x$.",
"robustness_ana... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=692$ fixes the function to $f(x)=692x$. |
math-018090 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Determine the requested value: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=54$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-1... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{54x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=54$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-11}{2})=-297$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=54x$.",
"robustness_analy... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=54$ fixes the function to $f(x)=54x$. |
math-018091 | Functional Equations: Cauchy — Continuity Implies Linearity | 10 | Try to avoid pattern-matching; explain why: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-381$, and that $f\... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-381x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-381$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{8}{3})=-1016$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-381$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-381x$. |
math-018092 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Work carefully and justify each inference: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, tha... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{-26x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-26$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-16}{7})=\\frac{416}{7}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Bot... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-26$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-26x$. |
math-018093 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Provide both a computational and a conceptual explanation: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{592x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=592$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{22}{3})=\\frac{13024}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclu... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=592$ fixes the function to $f(x)=592x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{592x}$.) |
math-018094 | Real Analysis: Additive Functions — Pathologies Avoided | 10 | Work carefully and justify each inference: Solve the functional equation and include a short explanation of why continuity is the key hypothesis:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=677$, a... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Consistency verification shows both paths yield the identical boxed result. Final answer: $\\boxed{677x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=677$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{2}{3})=\\frac{1354}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=677$ fixes the function to $f(x)=677x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{677x}$.) |
math-018095 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Where appropriate, name the theorem you use: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-590$, and that $f... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{-590x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-590$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(-1)=590$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-590x$.",
"... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Takeaway: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-590$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-590x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-590x}$.) |
math-018096 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Give a fully justified solution: Given an additive function with a regularity hypothesis, show it must be of the form $f(x)=kx$:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=-226$, and that $f\!\lef... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{-226x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-226$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{13}{3})=\\frac{-2938}{3}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-226x$... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-226$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-226x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-226x}$.) |
math-018097 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Work this out carefully: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=145$, and ... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Cross-check: both derivations land on the same invariant quantity. Final answer: $\\boxed{145x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=145$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{8}{7})=\\frac{1160}{7}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Key idea: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=145$ fixes the function to $f(x)=145x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{145x}$.) |
math-018098 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | Carefully track domains: Cauchy functional equation with regularity. Prove the function is linear and identify it:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1)=420$, and that $f\!\left(\frac{-17}{7}... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "The two methods are consistent and must coincide. Final answer: $\\boxed{420x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=420$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-17}{7})=-1020$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=420x$.",
"robust... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=420$ fixes the function to $f(x)=420x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{420x}$.) |
math-018099 | Functional Equations: Regularity Assumptions — Why Needed | 10 | Give reasoning, not just computation: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(... | [
{
"method_name": "Rationals + Density + Continuity",
"approach": "Use additivity to determine values on integers then rationals, then extend to all reals via continuity and density of the rationals.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: Put $x=y=0$ to get $f(0)=f(0)+f(0)$, hence $f(0)=0$.",
"Step 2: For int... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-407x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-407$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-13}{6})=\\frac{5291}{6}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-407x$.",
... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Core principle: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-407$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-407x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-407x}$.) |
math-018100 | Functional Equations: Additive Maps — Density Argument | 10 | State any required conditions first: Determine $f(x)$ for all real $x$. Your proof must show (a) rational values, (b) extension to reals using continuity:
Let $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfy Cauchy's equation $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Assume additionally that $f$ is continuous at $0$, that $f(1... | [
{
"method_name": "Boundedness Near 0 ⇒ Linearity",
"approach": "Continuity at 0 implies boundedness on a neighborhood; an additive function bounded on any interval must be linear, then $f(1)=k$ pins down the slope.",
"steps": [
"Step 1: By continuity at 0, there exists $\\delta>0$ such that $|x|<\... | {
"consistency_check": "Both approaches agree after simplification. Final answer: $\\boxed{-317x}$.\nBoth methods force linearity and use $f(1)=-317$ to identify the slope. The extra datum $f(\\frac{-1}{6})=\\frac{317}{6}$ is consistent with $f(x)=kx$ and serves as a built-in check. Both conclude $f(x)=-317x$.",
"r... | [
{
"error_description": "Concluded $f(x)=kx$ from $f(1)=k$ without explaining why irrationals are determined.",
"why_plausible": "On integers the conclusion is immediate, so it feels like it should extend automatically.",
"why_wrong": "Additivity alone does not determine $f$ on $\\mathbb{R}$; you must us... | Remember: Cauchy additivity has wild solutions unless you assume regularity. Continuity at 0 forces $f$ to be linear, and $f(1)=-317$ fixes the function to $f(x)=-317x$. (Here the result is $\boxed{-317x}$.) |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.