Datasets:

yale-nlp
/

Bright-Pro

license: mit
language:
  - en
task_categories:
  - text-retrieval
tags:
  - information-retrieval
  - reasoning
  - benchmark
  - bright
size_categories:
  - 100K<n<1M
pretty_name: Bright-Pro
configs:
  - config_name: examples
    data_files:
      - split: biology
        path: examples/biology.parquet
      - split: earth_science
        path: examples/earth_science.parquet
      - split: economics
        path: examples/economics.parquet
      - split: psychology
        path: examples/psychology.parquet
      - split: robotics
        path: examples/robotics.parquet
      - split: stackoverflow
        path: examples/stackoverflow.parquet
      - split: sustainable_living
        path: examples/sustainable_living.parquet
  - config_name: aspects
    data_files:
      - split: biology
        path: aspects/biology.parquet
      - split: earth_science
        path: aspects/earth_science.parquet
      - split: economics
        path: aspects/economics.parquet
      - split: psychology
        path: aspects/psychology.parquet
      - split: robotics
        path: aspects/robotics.parquet
      - split: stackoverflow
        path: aspects/stackoverflow.parquet
      - split: sustainable_living
        path: aspects/sustainable_living.parquet
  - config_name: documents
    data_files:
      - split: biology
        path: documents/biology.parquet
      - split: earth_science
        path: documents/earth_science.parquet
      - split: economics
        path: documents/economics.parquet
      - split: psychology
        path: documents/psychology.parquet
      - split: robotics
        path: documents/robotics.parquet
      - split: stackoverflow
        path: documents/stackoverflow.parquet
      - split: sustainable_living
        path: documents/sustainable_living.parquet

Bright-Pro

Bright-Pro is an expert-annotated extension of the BRIGHT benchmark for reasoning-intensive retrieval. Each query is paired with a multi-aspect reasoning decomposition, weighted importance scores per aspect, and a curated set of gold passages organized by aspect — enabling fine-grained analysis of whether a retriever covers the complementary reasoning aspects required to answer a query, rather than just surfacing one relevant passage.

Bright-Pro builds on the seven StackExchange subsets of BRIGHT. Annotators (1) decomposed each query's information need into reasoning aspects, (2) assigned an importance weight (Likert 1–3) to each aspect, (3) re-audited and consolidated BRIGHT's original positives, (4) collected new aspect-grounded positives, and (5) had a second annotator from the same field re-examine the result.

Subsets and statistics

Bright-Pro covers 739 queries across 7 StackExchange domains with 2,763 reasoning aspects and 5,272 gold passages drawn from a unified corpus of 526,319 documents.

Task	Queries	Aspects	Gold docs	Corpus docs
biology	103	406	804	59,513
earth_science	115	440	856	123,575
economics	99	367	773	52,240
psychology	100	384	707	54,741
robotics	101	375	623	63,920
stackoverflow	115	382	529	109,188
sustainable_living	106	409	980	63,142
Total	739	2,763	5,272	526,319

Configurations

Bright-Pro has three configurations. Each configuration has 7 splits, one per StackExchange domain.

`examples` — query-level annotations

Field	Type	Description
`id`	int	Per-task query id
`query`	string	Natural-language query (verbatim from BRIGHT StackExchange)
`gold_ids`	list[string]	All positive document ids for this query (from any aspect)
`reference_answer`	string	Reference long-form answer synthesized from the aspects, with `[doc_N]` citations to gold docs

`aspects` — reasoning-aspect annotations

Field	Type	Description
`id`	string	Aspect id, of the form `{task}-{qid}-a{k}`
`content`	string	Natural-language description of the reasoning aspect
`weight`	int	Raw Likert weight ∈ {1, 2, 3} (1 = minor, 2 = important, 3 = critical). Normalize per query via `weight / Σ_a weight` to get probabilities summing to 1
`supporting_docs`	list[string]	Document ids that support this aspect (the inverse of a doc → aspect map)

`documents` — corpus

Field	Type	Description
`id`	string	Document id, of the form `{task}-{qid}/extraction_{k}.txt`
`content`	string	Document text (cleaned and segmented)

Quick start

from datasets import load_dataset

# Per-task loading (any of the 7 SE domains)
examples = load_dataset("yale-nlp/Bright-Pro", "examples", split="biology")
aspects  = load_dataset("yale-nlp/Bright-Pro", "aspects",  split="biology")
docs     = load_dataset("yale-nlp/Bright-Pro", "documents", split="biology")

print(examples[0]["query"])
print(aspects[0]["content"], aspects[0]["weight"])
print(docs[0]["content"][:200])

To recover the per-query aspect weights as probabilities (Σ = 1):

from collections import defaultdict

raw_sum = defaultdict(float)
for a in aspects:
    qstem = a["id"].rsplit("-a", 1)[0]      # e.g. "biology-0"
    raw_sum[qstem] += a["weight"]

aspect_weight = {a["id"]: a["weight"] / raw_sum[a["id"].rsplit("-a", 1)[0]] for a in aspects}

To build the inverse doc_id → aspect_id map for a task:

doc_to_aspect = {}
for a in aspects:
    for d in a["supporting_docs"]:
        doc_to_aspect[d] = a["id"]

Evaluation

Bright-Pro supports two complementary evaluation regimes:

Static retrieval. A retriever ranks the per-task corpus once. Primary metric: α-nDCG@k (with α = 0.5) over the aspect-weighted gold set, complemented by Aspect-Recall@k, NDCG@k, and Recall@k. The metric rewards covering complementary aspects rather than over-retrieving from a single one.
Agentic retrieval. A retriever is plugged into an LLM agent that iteratively issues search queries and synthesizes a final answer. The agent loop is evaluated under two protocols:
- Fixed-round (R ∈ {1, 2, 3} rounds, top-5 per round) — measures retriever quality under matched interaction budgets via cumulative α-nDCG@5R, reasoning completeness, and overall answer quality.
- Adaptive-round — the agent decides when to stop. Measures both answer quality and interaction efficiency via the Efficiency-Quality Reward (AER) = OQ × exp(−γ (R−1)), with γ = 0.05.

Reasoning completeness and overall quality are rated by an LLM-as-Judge against a reference answer constructed from the annotated aspects and their supporting passages.

Differences from BRIGHT

Bright-Pro keeps BRIGHT's queries and corpus URLs but extends the gold-side annotation:

Aspects. Each query is decomposed into 2–6 reasoning aspects with Likert importance weights (BRIGHT has no aspect annotation).
Aspect-grounded gold. Original BRIGHT positives are re-audited (some discarded as topic-only), and new aspect-relevant passages are collected from the live web. Each gold passage is tied to exactly one aspect.
Reference answers. Each query has a reference long-form answer with citations to gold docs, used to drive the LLM-as-Judge evaluation.
Scope. Bright-Pro covers only the 7 StackExchange domains of BRIGHT — the Coding (LeetCode, Pony) and Theorem (AOPS, TheoremQA) subsets are excluded because they rely on syntactic or formal-logic matching rather than open-domain natural-language reasoning.

License

Released under the MIT License. The underlying StackExchange queries and the BRIGHT corpus retain their original licenses; consult the BRIGHT dataset card for upstream attribution.