Datasets:
EA2: Coverage Gap — Add Tests to Reach 90% Branch Coverage
Goal
A Python data validation library has insufficient test coverage. Add tests to reach at least 90% branch coverage. The existing tests cover only the happy paths.
Coverage Measurement
pytest --cov=validator --cov-branch --cov-report=term-missing
Target: ≥ 90% branch coverage across all modules in validator/.
Library Structure
validator/core.py— core validation functions: a domain-specific string validator (email/username/phone depending on seed),validate_range,validate_stringvalidator/rules.py— rule classes:RequiredRule,TypeRule,PatternRule,RangeRule,ValidationErrorvalidator/pipeline.py—Pipelineclass for chaining validation rules
What the Existing Tests Cover
tests/test_basic.py has 7 tests covering only success paths — valid inputs that pass
validation. Coverage is approximately 40%. All the error/edge-case branches are uncovered.
Guidance on Where Gaps Typically Occur
Validation code commonly has uncovered branches in:
- Rejection paths: what happens when the input is invalid, malformed, empty, or None
- Boundary conditions: behavior when values exactly equal the minimum or maximum thresholds
- Configuration errors: what happens when the validator itself is misconfigured (e.g., min > max in a range)
- Pipeline behavior: what happens when there are no rules, when the first rule fails
(early exit), when a duplicate rule is added, or when
clear()is called on an empty pipeline - Type coercion: behavior when values are of unexpected types
Use pytest --cov=validator --cov-branch --cov-report=term-missing to see exactly which
lines and branches are uncovered.
Deliverables
tests/test_validator.pywith comprehensive tests targeting the uncovered branches- Branch coverage ≥ 90% verified by pytest
- All existing tests still pass