outcome_id string | label string | order int64 | definition string | detection_stage string | failure_class string | example_case_id string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
verified | Verified | 1 | The cited authority exists. The attributed proposition is supported by the source text at the claimed pin cite. The evidence bundle is complete and reproducible. | existence_and_support | null | null |
authority_not_found | Authority Not Found | 2 | The citation does not resolve to a published opinion, statute, or record in canonical registries. | existence | total_fabrication | 001 |
proposition_unsupported | Proposition Unsupported | 3 | The authority exists. The attributed holding or rule is not entailed by the source text. | support | semantic_drift | 004 |
source_trail_missing | Source Trail Missing | 4 | The output references an authority but the workflow preserved no primary source material, retrieval snapshot, or runtime state needed to verify what the model actually saw. | evidence_preservation | provenance_gap | null |
unverifiable | Unverifiable | 5 | Insufficient evidence was preserved at generation time to classify the citation at all. | evidence_preservation | provenance_gap | null |
Part of the Dali Open Evidence Ecosystem
Dali is an open evidentiary infrastructure project for AI-assisted legal workflows. Our open datasets, reproducible benchmarks, and verification methodologies help preserve evidence, improve reproducibility, and support defensible AI-assisted decision making across jurisdictions.
Dali Verification Taxonomy
Five verification outcomes used by Dali to classify whether evidence behind an AI output can be trusted.
Applies beyond legal citations: any domain where AI outputs must be verified, exchanged, and preserved.
Evidence failures are not binary. Link checkers return valid or broken. Verification requires classification that separates what broke from why it broke.
Purpose
The Dali Verification Taxonomy provides a standardized language for classifying verification outcomes during AI-assisted legal review.
It enables consistent reporting, reproducible evaluation, and comparable verification results across tools and organizations.
Outcomes
| ID | Label | Detection stage |
|---|---|---|
| verified | Verified | existence_and_support |
| authority_not_found | Authority Not Found | existence |
| proposition_unsupported | Proposition Unsupported | support |
| source_trail_missing | Source Trail Missing | evidence_preservation |
| unverifiable | Unverifiable | evidence_preservation |
Files
outcomes.jsonl— one row per outcome for programmatic use (Dataset Viewer)meta/taxonomy.json— full taxonomy document
Engineering note
- Outcomes 2 and 3 require different detection pipelines
- Outcomes 4 and 5 are evidence preservation failures, not model failures
- Outcome 1 still requires a sealed bundle — correctness without provenance is not defensible
Intended Users
This project is designed for:
- Legal AI researchers
- AI evaluation platforms
- Law firms
- Legal technology companies
- Academic researchers
- Responsible AI practitioners
- Courts and public-interest organizations
- Open-source contributors
The Dali Open Evidence Ecosystem
Each project serves a different role while remaining independently useful.
| Resource | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Dali Citation Benchmark | Evaluate legal AI verification performance |
| Dali Verification Taxonomy | Standardize verification outcomes |
| Dali Open Evidence Corpus | Preserve reproducible evidence artifacts |
| Dali Platform | Open-source evidence infrastructure |
| Dali Evaluation Prompts | Cross-jurisdiction evaluation resources (planned) |
| Dali Replay Corpus | Replay traces and policy-version hashes (planned) |
| Dali Evidence Artifacts | Portable evidence packages (planned) |
GitHub
https://github.com/yenklabs/dali
Website
How Everything Fits Together
AI-Assisted Legal Work
│
▼
Citation Benchmark
│
▼
Verification Taxonomy
│
▼
Open Evidence Corpus
│
▼
Evidence Ledger
│
▼
Evidence Infrastructure
The benchmark evaluates.
The taxonomy classifies.
The corpus preserves evidence.
The Evidence Ledger records immutable verification history.
Together they form Dali's open evidence infrastructure.
Current Project
- Open-source project
- Public reproducible benchmark
- Cross-jurisdiction support
- Open verification taxonomy
- Open evidence corpus
- CC BY 4.0 licensed datasets
Citation
If you use this dataset in research, benchmarking, or publications, please cite:
@dataset{dali_verification_taxonomy_v0_1,
title = {Dali Verification Taxonomy},
author = {{Dali Contributors}},
organization = {GammaLex AI Inc.},
year = {2026},
version = {0.1},
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/yenklabs/dali-verification-taxonomy},
note = {Open taxonomy for classifying legal AI verification outcomes}
}
Future stable releases may include DOI-based citations.
Version History
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| v0.1 | Initial public release |
| v0.2 | Benchmark and documentation improvements |
| v1.0 | Planned stable research release |
Roadmap
Current
- ✓ Citation Benchmark
- ✓ Verification Taxonomy
- ✓ Dali Open Evidence Corpus
- ✓ Open-source verification platform
Planned
- Proposition verification
- Cross-jurisdiction expansion
- Community-contributed evidence
- Quarterly benchmark reports
- Evidence Ledger
- Evidence replay and reconstructability
- Dali Evaluation Prompts
- Dali Replay Corpus
- Dali Evidence Artifacts
- Research models (taxonomy classifier, citation risk, authority matching, proposition support)
Contributing
We welcome community contributions.
Areas where contributors can help include:
- Additional jurisdictions
- Verification methodologies
- Evidence artifacts
- Benchmark prompts
- Documentation improvements
- Dataset validation
- Research collaboration
GitHub
https://github.com/yenklabs/dali
Design Principles
The Dali ecosystem is built around:
- Reproducibility
- Transparency
- Independent verification
- Evidence preservation
- Human accountability
- Cross-jurisdiction support
- Open collaboration
Why Dali Exists
AI-assisted legal work increasingly requires more than model outputs.
Organizations need to understand:
- What the AI generated.
- What evidence was reviewed.
- What could be independently verified.
- What could not be verified.
- What changed during review.
- What humans ultimately decided.
Dali provides open benchmarks, verification methodologies, and evidence artifacts that make AI-assisted legal work more reproducible, transparent, and defensible.
Related resources
- Essay: yenklabs.com/notes/dali-five-verification-outcomes
- Open evidence corpus: huggingface.co/datasets/yenklabs/open-evidence-corpus
- Benchmark: yenklabs/dali-citation-benchmark
- EPS draft: yenklabs.com/artifacts/evidence-package-spec-v0.1
- Ecosystem: huggingface.co/yenklabs
- Downloads last month
- 69