author
string | post
string | ori_topic
string | ori_id
string | new_topic
string | label
int64 | type_idx
int64 | new_id
int64 | arc_id
int64 | text
string | pos_text
string | text_s
string | topic
string | topic_str
string | seen?
int64 | contains_topic?
int64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R Stein
|
Thank goodness that this newspaper can showcase the ethical and economic agendas of such lobbying organizations. If we didn't see such nutty statements as Adams emits, we would be less alert to the clear danger of letting anarchist political interest ruin our country. Folks, there are sociopathic forces that would, for corporate interest cloaked in the word liberty, dismantle the American experiment. We have, and can, do much better.
|
companies
|
A364-P
|
lobby
| 0
| 3
| 5,310
| 16,622,934
|
[["thank", "goodness", "newspaper", "showcase", "ethical", "economic", "agendas", "lobbying", "organizations"], ["n't", "see", "nutty", "statements", "adams", "emits", "would", "less", "alert", "clear", "danger", "letting", "anarchist", "political", "interest", "ruin", "country"], ["folks", "sociopathic", "forces", "would", "corporate", "interest", "cloaked", "word", "liberty", "dismantle", "american", "experiment"], ["much", "better"]]
|
[["VBP", "NN", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNS", "MD", "RBR", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "MD", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJR"]]
|
thank goodness newspaper showcase ethical economic agendas lobbying organizations. n't see nutty statements adams emits would less alert clear danger letting anarchist political interest ruin country. folks sociopathic forces would corporate interest cloaked word liberty dismantle american experiment. much better
|
["lobby"]
|
lobby
| 1
| 1
|
R Stein
|
Thank goodness that this newspaper can showcase the ethical and economic agendas of such lobbying organizations. If we didn't see such nutty statements as Adams emits, we would be less alert to the clear danger of letting anarchist political interest ruin our country. Folks, there are sociopathic forces that would, for corporate interest cloaked in the word liberty, dismantle the American experiment. We have, and can, do much better.
|
companies
|
A364-P
|
lobbying organizations
| 0
| 3
| 5,311
| 16,622,934
|
[["thank", "goodness", "newspaper", "showcase", "ethical", "economic", "agendas", "lobbying", "organizations"], ["n't", "see", "nutty", "statements", "adams", "emits", "would", "less", "alert", "clear", "danger", "letting", "anarchist", "political", "interest", "ruin", "country"], ["folks", "sociopathic", "forces", "would", "corporate", "interest", "cloaked", "word", "liberty", "dismantle", "american", "experiment"], ["much", "better"]]
|
[["VBP", "NN", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNS", "MD", "RBR", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "MD", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJR"]]
|
thank goodness newspaper showcase ethical economic agendas lobbying organizations. n't see nutty statements adams emits would less alert clear danger letting anarchist political interest ruin country. folks sociopathic forces would corporate interest cloaked word liberty dismantle american experiment. much better
|
["lobbying", "organization"]
|
lobbying organization
| 1
| 1
|
Sam
|
#10 has stated the facts. Any firm --even a quasi-government firm--- can release anyone for any reason at anytime except the reasons he has mentioned, Wake up, employees, the government protects your freedom of speech. You can't be arrested for burning the Koran, Bible, Torah, flag, effigies of anyone --as long as it's not considered to be a build up to a physical threat. HOWEVER, your employer may choose to fire you for any of these reasons although these activities are done outside of the work day. There is no recourse. Salam Al-Marayati would be well in his rights. Shariah law has nothing to do with this.
|
speech
|
A1121-P
|
speech
| 1
| 1
| 8,710
| 2,565,463
|
[["10", "stated", "facts"], ["firm", "--even", "quasi", "government", "firm---", "release", "anyone", "reason", "anytime", "except", "reasons", "mentioned", "wake", "employees", "government", "protects", "freedom", "speech"], ["ca", "n't", "arrested", "burning", "koran", "bible", "torah", "flag", "effigies", "anyone", "--as", "long", "'s", "considered", "build", "physical", "threat"], ["however", "employer", "may", "choose", "fire", "reasons", "although", "activities", "done", "outside", "work", "day"], ["recourse"], ["salam", "al", "marayati", "would", "well", "rights"], ["shariah", "law", "nothing"]]
|
[["CD", "VBN", "NNS"], ["NN", ":", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "IN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "HYPH", "RB", "VBZ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "MD", "VB", "VB", "NNS", "IN", "NNS", "VBN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "MD", "RB", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "NN"]]
|
10 stated facts. firm --even quasi government firm--- release anyone reason anytime except reasons mentioned wake employees government protects freedom speech. ca n't arrested burning koran bible torah flag effigies anyone --as long 's considered build physical threat. however employer may choose fire reasons although activities done outside work day. recourse. salam al marayati would well rights. shariah law nothing
|
["speech"]
|
speech
| 1
| 1
|
Sam
|
#10 has stated the facts. Any firm --even a quasi-government firm--- can release anyone for any reason at anytime except the reasons he has mentioned, Wake up, employees, the government protects your freedom of speech. You can't be arrested for burning the Koran, Bible, Torah, flag, effigies of anyone --as long as it's not considered to be a build up to a physical threat. HOWEVER, your employer may choose to fire you for any of these reasons although these activities are done outside of the work day. There is no recourse. Salam Al-Marayati would be well in his rights. Shariah law has nothing to do with this.
|
speech
|
A1121-P
|
freedom of speech
| 1
| 3
| 8,711
| 2,565,463
|
[["10", "stated", "facts"], ["firm", "--even", "quasi", "government", "firm---", "release", "anyone", "reason", "anytime", "except", "reasons", "mentioned", "wake", "employees", "government", "protects", "freedom", "speech"], ["ca", "n't", "arrested", "burning", "koran", "bible", "torah", "flag", "effigies", "anyone", "--as", "long", "'s", "considered", "build", "physical", "threat"], ["however", "employer", "may", "choose", "fire", "reasons", "although", "activities", "done", "outside", "work", "day"], ["recourse"], ["salam", "al", "marayati", "would", "well", "rights"], ["shariah", "law", "nothing"]]
|
[["CD", "VBN", "NNS"], ["NN", ":", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "IN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "HYPH", "RB", "VBZ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "MD", "VB", "VB", "NNS", "IN", "NNS", "VBN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "MD", "RB", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "NN"]]
|
10 stated facts. firm --even quasi government firm--- release anyone reason anytime except reasons mentioned wake employees government protects freedom speech. ca n't arrested burning koran bible torah flag effigies anyone --as long 's considered build physical threat. however employer may choose fire reasons although activities done outside work day. recourse. salam al marayati would well rights. shariah law nothing
|
["freedom", "speech"]
|
freedom speech
| 1
| 1
|
Sam
|
#10 has stated the facts. Any firm --even a quasi-government firm--- can release anyone for any reason at anytime except the reasons he has mentioned, Wake up, employees, the government protects your freedom of speech. You can't be arrested for burning the Koran, Bible, Torah, flag, effigies of anyone --as long as it's not considered to be a build up to a physical threat. HOWEVER, your employer may choose to fire you for any of these reasons although these activities are done outside of the work day. There is no recourse. Salam Al-Marayati would be well in his rights. Shariah law has nothing to do with this.
|
speech
|
A1121-P
|
right to work
| 1
| 3
| 8,712
| 2,565,463
|
[["10", "stated", "facts"], ["firm", "--even", "quasi", "government", "firm---", "release", "anyone", "reason", "anytime", "except", "reasons", "mentioned", "wake", "employees", "government", "protects", "freedom", "speech"], ["ca", "n't", "arrested", "burning", "koran", "bible", "torah", "flag", "effigies", "anyone", "--as", "long", "'s", "considered", "build", "physical", "threat"], ["however", "employer", "may", "choose", "fire", "reasons", "although", "activities", "done", "outside", "work", "day"], ["recourse"], ["salam", "al", "marayati", "would", "well", "rights"], ["shariah", "law", "nothing"]]
|
[["CD", "VBN", "NNS"], ["NN", ":", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "IN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "HYPH", "RB", "VBZ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "MD", "VB", "VB", "NNS", "IN", "NNS", "VBN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "MD", "RB", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "NN"]]
|
10 stated facts. firm --even quasi government firm--- release anyone reason anytime except reasons mentioned wake employees government protects freedom speech. ca n't arrested burning koran bible torah flag effigies anyone --as long 's considered build physical threat. however employer may choose fire reasons although activities done outside work day. recourse. salam al marayati would well rights. shariah law nothing
|
["right", "work"]
|
right work
| 1
| 0
|
Sam
|
#10 has stated the facts. Any firm --even a quasi-government firm--- can release anyone for any reason at anytime except the reasons he has mentioned, Wake up, employees, the government protects your freedom of speech. You can't be arrested for burning the Koran, Bible, Torah, flag, effigies of anyone --as long as it's not considered to be a build up to a physical threat. HOWEVER, your employer may choose to fire you for any of these reasons although these activities are done outside of the work day. There is no recourse. Salam Al-Marayati would be well in his rights. Shariah law has nothing to do with this.
|
public workers
|
A1122-P
|
public workers
| 0
| 1
| 10,694
| 2,565,463
|
[["10", "stated", "facts"], ["firm", "--even", "quasi", "government", "firm---", "release", "anyone", "reason", "anytime", "except", "reasons", "mentioned", "wake", "employees", "government", "protects", "freedom", "speech"], ["ca", "n't", "arrested", "burning", "koran", "bible", "torah", "flag", "effigies", "anyone", "--as", "long", "'s", "considered", "build", "physical", "threat"], ["however", "employer", "may", "choose", "fire", "reasons", "although", "activities", "done", "outside", "work", "day"], ["recourse"], ["salam", "al", "marayati", "would", "well", "rights"], ["shariah", "law", "nothing"]]
|
[["CD", "VBN", "NNS"], ["NN", ":", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "IN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "HYPH", "RB", "VBZ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "MD", "VB", "VB", "NNS", "IN", "NNS", "VBN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "MD", "RB", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "NN"]]
|
10 stated facts. firm --even quasi government firm--- release anyone reason anytime except reasons mentioned wake employees government protects freedom speech. ca n't arrested burning koran bible torah flag effigies anyone --as long 's considered build physical threat. however employer may choose fire reasons although activities done outside work day. recourse. salam al marayati would well rights. shariah law nothing
|
["public", "worker"]
|
public worker
| 1
| 0
|
Sam
|
#10 has stated the facts. Any firm --even a quasi-government firm--- can release anyone for any reason at anytime except the reasons he has mentioned, Wake up, employees, the government protects your freedom of speech. You can't be arrested for burning the Koran, Bible, Torah, flag, effigies of anyone --as long as it's not considered to be a build up to a physical threat. HOWEVER, your employer may choose to fire you for any of these reasons although these activities are done outside of the work day. There is no recourse. Salam Al-Marayati would be well in his rights. Shariah law has nothing to do with this.
|
public workers
|
A1122-P
|
at will employment
| 0
| 3
| 10,695
| 2,565,463
|
[["10", "stated", "facts"], ["firm", "--even", "quasi", "government", "firm---", "release", "anyone", "reason", "anytime", "except", "reasons", "mentioned", "wake", "employees", "government", "protects", "freedom", "speech"], ["ca", "n't", "arrested", "burning", "koran", "bible", "torah", "flag", "effigies", "anyone", "--as", "long", "'s", "considered", "build", "physical", "threat"], ["however", "employer", "may", "choose", "fire", "reasons", "although", "activities", "done", "outside", "work", "day"], ["recourse"], ["salam", "al", "marayati", "would", "well", "rights"], ["shariah", "law", "nothing"]]
|
[["CD", "VBN", "NNS"], ["NN", ":", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "IN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "HYPH", "RB", "VBZ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "MD", "VB", "VB", "NNS", "IN", "NNS", "VBN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "MD", "RB", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "NN"]]
|
10 stated facts. firm --even quasi government firm--- release anyone reason anytime except reasons mentioned wake employees government protects freedom speech. ca n't arrested burning koran bible torah flag effigies anyone --as long 's considered build physical threat. however employer may choose fire reasons although activities done outside work day. recourse. salam al marayati would well rights. shariah law nothing
|
["employment"]
|
employment
| 1
| 0
|
Laurence Svirchev
|
1. This 'Food Babe' (neat commercial!) seems to think that her personal campaigns forced some mega food companies to change their labels. Consumer protest works, but not when it is a solo effort. A bit much self-promotion here. 2. This debate is about one word, "natural." Language is too complex for the debate to be about one word. The issue is can claiming in the name that something is not present. It defies logic to state in a product name that lemon is in the product when in fact there is no lemon at all. That is simply misleading (bold face lying). "Lemon" in common nomenclature is something that comes from the lemon plant, not it's laboratory produced analog. Isn't truth in advertising the issue? 3. My food slogan is "I'm very careful about what I put in my mouth." So that unfortunately means every label must be scrutinized.
|
use of the word
|
A3684-P
|
use of the word
| 1
| 1
| 2,646
| 13,305,179
|
[["1"], ["food", "babe", "neat", "commercial"], ["seems", "think", "personal", "campaigns", "forced", "mega", "food", "companies", "change", "labels"], ["consumer", "protest", "works", "solo", "effort"], ["bit", "much", "self", "promotion"], ["2"], ["debate", "one", "word", "natural"], ["language", "complex", "debate", "one", "word"], ["issue", "claiming", "name", "something", "present"], ["defies", "logic", "state", "product", "name", "lemon", "product", "fact", "lemon"], ["simply", "misleading", "bold", "face", "lying"], ["lemon", "common", "nomenclature", "something", "comes", "lemon", "plant", "'s", "laboratory", "produced", "analog"], ["n't", "truth", "advertising", "issue"], ["3"], ["food", "slogan", "'m", "careful", "put", "mouth"], ["unfortunately", "means", "every", "label", "must", "scrutinized"]]
|
[["LS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBZ", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "JJ"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VBG", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "VBD", "NN"], ["RB", "VBZ", "DT", "NN", "MD", "VBN"]]
|
1. food babe neat commercial. seems think personal campaigns forced mega food companies change labels. consumer protest works solo effort. bit much self promotion. 2. debate one word natural. language complex debate one word. issue claiming name something present. defies logic state product name lemon product fact lemon. simply misleading bold face lying. lemon common nomenclature something comes lemon plant 's laboratory produced analog. n't truth advertising issue. 3. food slogan 'm careful put mouth. unfortunately means every label must scrutinized
|
["use", "word"]
|
use word
| 1
| 0
|
Laurence Svirchev
|
1. This 'Food Babe' (neat commercial!) seems to think that her personal campaigns forced some mega food companies to change their labels. Consumer protest works, but not when it is a solo effort. A bit much self-promotion here. 2. This debate is about one word, "natural." Language is too complex for the debate to be about one word. The issue is can claiming in the name that something is not present. It defies logic to state in a product name that lemon is in the product when in fact there is no lemon at all. That is simply misleading (bold face lying). "Lemon" in common nomenclature is something that comes from the lemon plant, not it's laboratory produced analog. Isn't truth in advertising the issue? 3. My food slogan is "I'm very careful about what I put in my mouth." So that unfortunately means every label must be scrutinized.
|
use of the word
|
A3684-P
|
food labeling
| 1
| 3
| 2,647
| 13,305,179
|
[["1"], ["food", "babe", "neat", "commercial"], ["seems", "think", "personal", "campaigns", "forced", "mega", "food", "companies", "change", "labels"], ["consumer", "protest", "works", "solo", "effort"], ["bit", "much", "self", "promotion"], ["2"], ["debate", "one", "word", "natural"], ["language", "complex", "debate", "one", "word"], ["issue", "claiming", "name", "something", "present"], ["defies", "logic", "state", "product", "name", "lemon", "product", "fact", "lemon"], ["simply", "misleading", "bold", "face", "lying"], ["lemon", "common", "nomenclature", "something", "comes", "lemon", "plant", "'s", "laboratory", "produced", "analog"], ["n't", "truth", "advertising", "issue"], ["3"], ["food", "slogan", "'m", "careful", "put", "mouth"], ["unfortunately", "means", "every", "label", "must", "scrutinized"]]
|
[["LS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBZ", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "JJ"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VBG", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "VBD", "NN"], ["RB", "VBZ", "DT", "NN", "MD", "VBN"]]
|
1. food babe neat commercial. seems think personal campaigns forced mega food companies change labels. consumer protest works solo effort. bit much self promotion. 2. debate one word natural. language complex debate one word. issue claiming name something present. defies logic state product name lemon product fact lemon. simply misleading bold face lying. lemon common nomenclature something comes lemon plant 's laboratory produced analog. n't truth advertising issue. 3. food slogan 'm careful put mouth. unfortunately means every label must scrutinized
|
["food", "labeling"]
|
food labeling
| 1
| 0
|
Laurence Svirchev
|
1. This 'Food Babe' (neat commercial!) seems to think that her personal campaigns forced some mega food companies to change their labels. Consumer protest works, but not when it is a solo effort. A bit much self-promotion here. 2. This debate is about one word, "natural." Language is too complex for the debate to be about one word. The issue is can claiming in the name that something is not present. It defies logic to state in a product name that lemon is in the product when in fact there is no lemon at all. That is simply misleading (bold face lying). "Lemon" in common nomenclature is something that comes from the lemon plant, not it's laboratory produced analog. Isn't truth in advertising the issue? 3. My food slogan is "I'm very careful about what I put in my mouth." So that unfortunately means every label must be scrutinized.
|
use of the word
|
A3684-P
|
food labeling
| 1
| 2
| 2,648
| 13,305,179
|
[["1"], ["food", "babe", "neat", "commercial"], ["seems", "think", "personal", "campaigns", "forced", "mega", "food", "companies", "change", "labels"], ["consumer", "protest", "works", "solo", "effort"], ["bit", "much", "self", "promotion"], ["2"], ["debate", "one", "word", "natural"], ["language", "complex", "debate", "one", "word"], ["issue", "claiming", "name", "something", "present"], ["defies", "logic", "state", "product", "name", "lemon", "product", "fact", "lemon"], ["simply", "misleading", "bold", "face", "lying"], ["lemon", "common", "nomenclature", "something", "comes", "lemon", "plant", "'s", "laboratory", "produced", "analog"], ["n't", "truth", "advertising", "issue"], ["3"], ["food", "slogan", "'m", "careful", "put", "mouth"], ["unfortunately", "means", "every", "label", "must", "scrutinized"]]
|
[["LS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBZ", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "JJ"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VBG", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "VBD", "NN"], ["RB", "VBZ", "DT", "NN", "MD", "VBN"]]
|
1. food babe neat commercial. seems think personal campaigns forced mega food companies change labels. consumer protest works solo effort. bit much self promotion. 2. debate one word natural. language complex debate one word. issue claiming name something present. defies logic state product name lemon product fact lemon. simply misleading bold face lying. lemon common nomenclature something comes lemon plant 's laboratory produced analog. n't truth advertising issue. 3. food slogan 'm careful put mouth. unfortunately means every label must scrutinized
|
["food", "labeling"]
|
food labeling
| 1
| 0
|
Laurence Svirchev
|
1. This 'Food Babe' (neat commercial!) seems to think that her personal campaigns forced some mega food companies to change their labels. Consumer protest works, but not when it is a solo effort. A bit much self-promotion here. 2. This debate is about one word, "natural." Language is too complex for the debate to be about one word. The issue is can claiming in the name that something is not present. It defies logic to state in a product name that lemon is in the product when in fact there is no lemon at all. That is simply misleading (bold face lying). "Lemon" in common nomenclature is something that comes from the lemon plant, not it's laboratory produced analog. Isn't truth in advertising the issue? 3. My food slogan is "I'm very careful about what I put in my mouth." So that unfortunately means every label must be scrutinized.
|
use of the word
|
A3684-P
|
truth in advertising
| 1
| 3
| 2,649
| 13,305,179
|
[["1"], ["food", "babe", "neat", "commercial"], ["seems", "think", "personal", "campaigns", "forced", "mega", "food", "companies", "change", "labels"], ["consumer", "protest", "works", "solo", "effort"], ["bit", "much", "self", "promotion"], ["2"], ["debate", "one", "word", "natural"], ["language", "complex", "debate", "one", "word"], ["issue", "claiming", "name", "something", "present"], ["defies", "logic", "state", "product", "name", "lemon", "product", "fact", "lemon"], ["simply", "misleading", "bold", "face", "lying"], ["lemon", "common", "nomenclature", "something", "comes", "lemon", "plant", "'s", "laboratory", "produced", "analog"], ["n't", "truth", "advertising", "issue"], ["3"], ["food", "slogan", "'m", "careful", "put", "mouth"], ["unfortunately", "means", "every", "label", "must", "scrutinized"]]
|
[["LS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBZ", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "JJ"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VBG", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "VBD", "NN"], ["RB", "VBZ", "DT", "NN", "MD", "VBN"]]
|
1. food babe neat commercial. seems think personal campaigns forced mega food companies change labels. consumer protest works solo effort. bit much self promotion. 2. debate one word natural. language complex debate one word. issue claiming name something present. defies logic state product name lemon product fact lemon. simply misleading bold face lying. lemon common nomenclature something comes lemon plant 's laboratory produced analog. n't truth advertising issue. 3. food slogan 'm careful put mouth. unfortunately means every label must scrutinized
|
["truth", "advertising"]
|
truth advertising
| 1
| 1
|
Laurence Svirchev
|
1. This 'Food Babe' (neat commercial!) seems to think that her personal campaigns forced some mega food companies to change their labels. Consumer protest works, but not when it is a solo effort. A bit much self-promotion here. 2. This debate is about one word, "natural." Language is too complex for the debate to be about one word. The issue is can claiming in the name that something is not present. It defies logic to state in a product name that lemon is in the product when in fact there is no lemon at all. That is simply misleading (bold face lying). "Lemon" in common nomenclature is something that comes from the lemon plant, not it's laboratory produced analog. Isn't truth in advertising the issue? 3. My food slogan is "I'm very careful about what I put in my mouth." So that unfortunately means every label must be scrutinized.
|
food labels
|
A3685-P
|
food labels
| 1
| 1
| 2,655
| 13,305,179
|
[["1"], ["food", "babe", "neat", "commercial"], ["seems", "think", "personal", "campaigns", "forced", "mega", "food", "companies", "change", "labels"], ["consumer", "protest", "works", "solo", "effort"], ["bit", "much", "self", "promotion"], ["2"], ["debate", "one", "word", "natural"], ["language", "complex", "debate", "one", "word"], ["issue", "claiming", "name", "something", "present"], ["defies", "logic", "state", "product", "name", "lemon", "product", "fact", "lemon"], ["simply", "misleading", "bold", "face", "lying"], ["lemon", "common", "nomenclature", "something", "comes", "lemon", "plant", "'s", "laboratory", "produced", "analog"], ["n't", "truth", "advertising", "issue"], ["3"], ["food", "slogan", "'m", "careful", "put", "mouth"], ["unfortunately", "means", "every", "label", "must", "scrutinized"]]
|
[["LS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBZ", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "JJ"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VBG", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "VBD", "NN"], ["RB", "VBZ", "DT", "NN", "MD", "VBN"]]
|
1. food babe neat commercial. seems think personal campaigns forced mega food companies change labels. consumer protest works solo effort. bit much self promotion. 2. debate one word natural. language complex debate one word. issue claiming name something present. defies logic state product name lemon product fact lemon. simply misleading bold face lying. lemon common nomenclature something comes lemon plant 's laboratory produced analog. n't truth advertising issue. 3. food slogan 'm careful put mouth. unfortunately means every label must scrutinized
|
["food", "label"]
|
food label
| 1
| 0
|
Laurence Svirchev
|
1. This 'Food Babe' (neat commercial!) seems to think that her personal campaigns forced some mega food companies to change their labels. Consumer protest works, but not when it is a solo effort. A bit much self-promotion here. 2. This debate is about one word, "natural." Language is too complex for the debate to be about one word. The issue is can claiming in the name that something is not present. It defies logic to state in a product name that lemon is in the product when in fact there is no lemon at all. That is simply misleading (bold face lying). "Lemon" in common nomenclature is something that comes from the lemon plant, not it's laboratory produced analog. Isn't truth in advertising the issue? 3. My food slogan is "I'm very careful about what I put in my mouth." So that unfortunately means every label must be scrutinized.
|
food labels
|
A3685-P
|
food label laws
| 1
| 3
| 2,656
| 13,305,179
|
[["1"], ["food", "babe", "neat", "commercial"], ["seems", "think", "personal", "campaigns", "forced", "mega", "food", "companies", "change", "labels"], ["consumer", "protest", "works", "solo", "effort"], ["bit", "much", "self", "promotion"], ["2"], ["debate", "one", "word", "natural"], ["language", "complex", "debate", "one", "word"], ["issue", "claiming", "name", "something", "present"], ["defies", "logic", "state", "product", "name", "lemon", "product", "fact", "lemon"], ["simply", "misleading", "bold", "face", "lying"], ["lemon", "common", "nomenclature", "something", "comes", "lemon", "plant", "'s", "laboratory", "produced", "analog"], ["n't", "truth", "advertising", "issue"], ["3"], ["food", "slogan", "'m", "careful", "put", "mouth"], ["unfortunately", "means", "every", "label", "must", "scrutinized"]]
|
[["LS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBZ", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "JJ"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VBG", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "VBD", "NN"], ["RB", "VBZ", "DT", "NN", "MD", "VBN"]]
|
1. food babe neat commercial. seems think personal campaigns forced mega food companies change labels. consumer protest works solo effort. bit much self promotion. 2. debate one word natural. language complex debate one word. issue claiming name something present. defies logic state product name lemon product fact lemon. simply misleading bold face lying. lemon common nomenclature something comes lemon plant 's laboratory produced analog. n't truth advertising issue. 3. food slogan 'm careful put mouth. unfortunately means every label must scrutinized
|
["food", "label", "law"]
|
food label law
| 1
| 0
|
Laurence Svirchev
|
1. This 'Food Babe' (neat commercial!) seems to think that her personal campaigns forced some mega food companies to change their labels. Consumer protest works, but not when it is a solo effort. A bit much self-promotion here. 2. This debate is about one word, "natural." Language is too complex for the debate to be about one word. The issue is can claiming in the name that something is not present. It defies logic to state in a product name that lemon is in the product when in fact there is no lemon at all. That is simply misleading (bold face lying). "Lemon" in common nomenclature is something that comes from the lemon plant, not it's laboratory produced analog. Isn't truth in advertising the issue? 3. My food slogan is "I'm very careful about what I put in my mouth." So that unfortunately means every label must be scrutinized.
|
food labels
|
A3685-P
|
protest
| 1
| 3
| 2,657
| 13,305,179
|
[["1"], ["food", "babe", "neat", "commercial"], ["seems", "think", "personal", "campaigns", "forced", "mega", "food", "companies", "change", "labels"], ["consumer", "protest", "works", "solo", "effort"], ["bit", "much", "self", "promotion"], ["2"], ["debate", "one", "word", "natural"], ["language", "complex", "debate", "one", "word"], ["issue", "claiming", "name", "something", "present"], ["defies", "logic", "state", "product", "name", "lemon", "product", "fact", "lemon"], ["simply", "misleading", "bold", "face", "lying"], ["lemon", "common", "nomenclature", "something", "comes", "lemon", "plant", "'s", "laboratory", "produced", "analog"], ["n't", "truth", "advertising", "issue"], ["3"], ["food", "slogan", "'m", "careful", "put", "mouth"], ["unfortunately", "means", "every", "label", "must", "scrutinized"]]
|
[["LS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBZ", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "JJ"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VBG", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "VBD", "NN"], ["RB", "VBZ", "DT", "NN", "MD", "VBN"]]
|
1. food babe neat commercial. seems think personal campaigns forced mega food companies change labels. consumer protest works solo effort. bit much self promotion. 2. debate one word natural. language complex debate one word. issue claiming name something present. defies logic state product name lemon product fact lemon. simply misleading bold face lying. lemon common nomenclature something comes lemon plant 's laboratory produced analog. n't truth advertising issue. 3. food slogan 'm careful put mouth. unfortunately means every label must scrutinized
|
["protest"]
|
protest
| 1
| 1
|
Laurence Svirchev
|
1. This 'Food Babe' (neat commercial!) seems to think that her personal campaigns forced some mega food companies to change their labels. Consumer protest works, but not when it is a solo effort. A bit much self-promotion here. 2. This debate is about one word, "natural." Language is too complex for the debate to be about one word. The issue is can claiming in the name that something is not present. It defies logic to state in a product name that lemon is in the product when in fact there is no lemon at all. That is simply misleading (bold face lying). "Lemon" in common nomenclature is something that comes from the lemon plant, not it's laboratory produced analog. Isn't truth in advertising the issue? 3. My food slogan is "I'm very careful about what I put in my mouth." So that unfortunately means every label must be scrutinized.
|
food labels
|
A3685-P
|
natural
| 0
| 3
| 2,658
| 13,305,179
|
[["1"], ["food", "babe", "neat", "commercial"], ["seems", "think", "personal", "campaigns", "forced", "mega", "food", "companies", "change", "labels"], ["consumer", "protest", "works", "solo", "effort"], ["bit", "much", "self", "promotion"], ["2"], ["debate", "one", "word", "natural"], ["language", "complex", "debate", "one", "word"], ["issue", "claiming", "name", "something", "present"], ["defies", "logic", "state", "product", "name", "lemon", "product", "fact", "lemon"], ["simply", "misleading", "bold", "face", "lying"], ["lemon", "common", "nomenclature", "something", "comes", "lemon", "plant", "'s", "laboratory", "produced", "analog"], ["n't", "truth", "advertising", "issue"], ["3"], ["food", "slogan", "'m", "careful", "put", "mouth"], ["unfortunately", "means", "every", "label", "must", "scrutinized"]]
|
[["LS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBZ", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "JJ"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VBG", "NN"], ["LS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "VBD", "NN"], ["RB", "VBZ", "DT", "NN", "MD", "VBN"]]
|
1. food babe neat commercial. seems think personal campaigns forced mega food companies change labels. consumer protest works solo effort. bit much self promotion. 2. debate one word natural. language complex debate one word. issue claiming name something present. defies logic state product name lemon product fact lemon. simply misleading bold face lying. lemon common nomenclature something comes lemon plant 's laboratory produced analog. n't truth advertising issue. 3. food slogan 'm careful put mouth. unfortunately means every label must scrutinized
|
["natural"]
|
natural
| 1
| 1
|
Connie Boyd
|
Home schooling isn't only a scam designed to de-fund public schools and punish the teachers' unions for supporting Democratic candidates and policies. It is also a scam by some extremist social conservatives to keep women out if the paid labor force. This proposed tax credit should be called what it is--an increase in government spending. Then let the Republicans try to defend it.
|
a tax break
|
A5210-P
|
a tax break
| 0
| 1
| 6,898
| 3,171,678
|
[["home", "schooling", "n't", "scam", "designed", "de", "fund", "public", "schools", "punish", "teachers", "unions", "supporting", "democratic", "candidates", "policies"], ["also", "scam", "extremist", "social", "conservatives", "keep", "women", "paid", "labor", "force"], ["proposed", "tax", "credit", "called", "--", "increase", "government", "spending"], ["let", "republicans", "try", "defend"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", ":", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNPS", "VB", "VB"]]
|
home schooling n't scam designed de fund public schools punish teachers unions supporting democratic candidates policies. also scam extremist social conservatives keep women paid labor force. proposed tax credit called -- increase government spending. let republicans try defend
|
["tax", "break"]
|
tax break
| 1
| 0
|
Connie Boyd
|
Home schooling isn't only a scam designed to de-fund public schools and punish the teachers' unions for supporting Democratic candidates and policies. It is also a scam by some extremist social conservatives to keep women out if the paid labor force. This proposed tax credit should be called what it is--an increase in government spending. Then let the Republicans try to defend it.
|
a tax break
|
A5210-P
|
home schooling
| 0
| 3
| 6,899
| 3,171,678
|
[["home", "schooling", "n't", "scam", "designed", "de", "fund", "public", "schools", "punish", "teachers", "unions", "supporting", "democratic", "candidates", "policies"], ["also", "scam", "extremist", "social", "conservatives", "keep", "women", "paid", "labor", "force"], ["proposed", "tax", "credit", "called", "--", "increase", "government", "spending"], ["let", "republicans", "try", "defend"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", ":", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNPS", "VB", "VB"]]
|
home schooling n't scam designed de fund public schools punish teachers unions supporting democratic candidates policies. also scam extremist social conservatives keep women paid labor force. proposed tax credit called -- increase government spending. let republicans try defend
|
["home", "schooling"]
|
home schooling
| 1
| 1
|
Connie Boyd
|
Home schooling isn't only a scam designed to de-fund public schools and punish the teachers' unions for supporting Democratic candidates and policies. It is also a scam by some extremist social conservatives to keep women out if the paid labor force. This proposed tax credit should be called what it is--an increase in government spending. Then let the Republicans try to defend it.
|
home schoolers
|
A5209-P
|
home schoolers
| 0
| 1
| 10,523
| 3,171,678
|
[["home", "schooling", "n't", "scam", "designed", "de", "fund", "public", "schools", "punish", "teachers", "unions", "supporting", "democratic", "candidates", "policies"], ["also", "scam", "extremist", "social", "conservatives", "keep", "women", "paid", "labor", "force"], ["proposed", "tax", "credit", "called", "--", "increase", "government", "spending"], ["let", "republicans", "try", "defend"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", ":", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNPS", "VB", "VB"]]
|
home schooling n't scam designed de fund public schools punish teachers unions supporting democratic candidates policies. also scam extremist social conservatives keep women paid labor force. proposed tax credit called -- increase government spending. let republicans try defend
|
["home", "schoolers"]
|
home schoolers
| 1
| 0
|
Connie Boyd
|
Home schooling isn't only a scam designed to de-fund public schools and punish the teachers' unions for supporting Democratic candidates and policies. It is also a scam by some extremist social conservatives to keep women out if the paid labor force. This proposed tax credit should be called what it is--an increase in government spending. Then let the Republicans try to defend it.
|
home schoolers
|
A5209-P
|
homeschooling
| 0
| 3
| 10,524
| 3,171,678
|
[["home", "schooling", "n't", "scam", "designed", "de", "fund", "public", "schools", "punish", "teachers", "unions", "supporting", "democratic", "candidates", "policies"], ["also", "scam", "extremist", "social", "conservatives", "keep", "women", "paid", "labor", "force"], ["proposed", "tax", "credit", "called", "--", "increase", "government", "spending"], ["let", "republicans", "try", "defend"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", ":", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNPS", "VB", "VB"]]
|
home schooling n't scam designed de fund public schools punish teachers unions supporting democratic candidates policies. also scam extremist social conservatives keep women paid labor force. proposed tax credit called -- increase government spending. let republicans try defend
|
["homeschooling"]
|
homeschooling
| 1
| 0
|
Connie Boyd
|
Home schooling isn't only a scam designed to de-fund public schools and punish the teachers' unions for supporting Democratic candidates and policies. It is also a scam by some extremist social conservatives to keep women out if the paid labor force. This proposed tax credit should be called what it is--an increase in government spending. Then let the Republicans try to defend it.
|
home schoolers
|
A5209-P
|
home schooling
| 0
| 3
| 10,525
| 3,171,678
|
[["home", "schooling", "n't", "scam", "designed", "de", "fund", "public", "schools", "punish", "teachers", "unions", "supporting", "democratic", "candidates", "policies"], ["also", "scam", "extremist", "social", "conservatives", "keep", "women", "paid", "labor", "force"], ["proposed", "tax", "credit", "called", "--", "increase", "government", "spending"], ["let", "republicans", "try", "defend"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", ":", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNPS", "VB", "VB"]]
|
home schooling n't scam designed de fund public schools punish teachers unions supporting democratic candidates policies. also scam extremist social conservatives keep women paid labor force. proposed tax credit called -- increase government spending. let republicans try defend
|
["home", "schooling"]
|
home schooling
| 1
| 1
|
Robert
|
First, Marco seems quite bitter at the country that took him him, provided him scholarships, helped him succeed. I would be kissing the ground in thanks that I escaped to a decent place. This is often a common reaction from people who rely on the largesse of others. The Pew Hispanic Research poll a few years ago asked Mexicans if they would immigrate if they could. Fifty percent said they would. That would be sixty million people. That is just Mexico. The U.S., Canada, and Switzerland generally lead in the polls as to where people would live, if they could. Governments have the responsibility to protect their borders. Due to the desirability of the U.S., the U.S. government has a particular responsibility. From what I can tell, for the most part, people are welcoming of immigrants. They want a process where the appropriate background checks can be done, and the number can be controlled. People do not like it when others jump the line at the movie theatre or on the freeway. They do not like it in the immigration arena either.
|
immigration
|
A1315-P
|
immigration
| 0
| 1
| 2,185
| 15,992,159
|
[["first", "marco", "seems", "quite", "bitter", "country", "took", "provided", "scholarships", "helped", "succeed"], ["would", "kissing", "ground", "thanks", "escaped", "decent", "place"], ["often", "common", "reaction", "people", "rely", "largesse", "others"], ["pew", "hispanic", "research", "poll", "years", "ago", "asked", "mexicans", "would", "immigrate", "could"], ["fifty", "percent", "said", "would"], ["would", "sixty", "million", "people"], ["mexico"], ["u.s.", "canada", "switzerland", "generally", "lead", "polls", "people", "would", "live", "could"], ["governments", "responsibility", "protect", "borders"], ["due", "desirability", "u.s.", "u.s.", "government", "particular", "responsibility"], ["tell", "part", "people", "welcoming", "immigrants"], ["want", "process", "appropriate", "background", "checks", "done", "number", "controlled"], ["people", "like", "others", "jump", "line", "movie", "theatre", "freeway"], ["like", "immigration", "arena", "either"]]
|
[["RB", "NNP", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VBZ", "VBD", "VB"], ["MD", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBD", "NNPS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["CD", "NN", "VBD", "MD"], ["MD", "CD", "CD", "NNS"], ["NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VBP", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["IN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "VBN"], ["NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "RB"]]
|
first marco seems quite bitter country took provided scholarships helped succeed. would kissing ground thanks escaped decent place. often common reaction people rely largesse others. pew hispanic research poll years ago asked mexicans would immigrate could. fifty percent said would. would sixty million people. mexico. u.s. canada switzerland generally lead polls people would live could. governments responsibility protect borders. due desirability u.s. u.s. government particular responsibility. tell part people welcoming immigrants. want process appropriate background checks done number controlled. people like others jump line movie theatre freeway. like immigration arena either
|
["immigration"]
|
immigration
| 1
| 1
|
Robert
|
First, Marco seems quite bitter at the country that took him him, provided him scholarships, helped him succeed. I would be kissing the ground in thanks that I escaped to a decent place. This is often a common reaction from people who rely on the largesse of others. The Pew Hispanic Research poll a few years ago asked Mexicans if they would immigrate if they could. Fifty percent said they would. That would be sixty million people. That is just Mexico. The U.S., Canada, and Switzerland generally lead in the polls as to where people would live, if they could. Governments have the responsibility to protect their borders. Due to the desirability of the U.S., the U.S. government has a particular responsibility. From what I can tell, for the most part, people are welcoming of immigrants. They want a process where the appropriate background checks can be done, and the number can be controlled. People do not like it when others jump the line at the movie theatre or on the freeway. They do not like it in the immigration arena either.
|
immigration
|
A1315-P
|
protecting the borders
| 1
| 3
| 2,186
| 15,992,159
|
[["first", "marco", "seems", "quite", "bitter", "country", "took", "provided", "scholarships", "helped", "succeed"], ["would", "kissing", "ground", "thanks", "escaped", "decent", "place"], ["often", "common", "reaction", "people", "rely", "largesse", "others"], ["pew", "hispanic", "research", "poll", "years", "ago", "asked", "mexicans", "would", "immigrate", "could"], ["fifty", "percent", "said", "would"], ["would", "sixty", "million", "people"], ["mexico"], ["u.s.", "canada", "switzerland", "generally", "lead", "polls", "people", "would", "live", "could"], ["governments", "responsibility", "protect", "borders"], ["due", "desirability", "u.s.", "u.s.", "government", "particular", "responsibility"], ["tell", "part", "people", "welcoming", "immigrants"], ["want", "process", "appropriate", "background", "checks", "done", "number", "controlled"], ["people", "like", "others", "jump", "line", "movie", "theatre", "freeway"], ["like", "immigration", "arena", "either"]]
|
[["RB", "NNP", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VBZ", "VBD", "VB"], ["MD", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBD", "NNPS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["CD", "NN", "VBD", "MD"], ["MD", "CD", "CD", "NNS"], ["NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VBP", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["IN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "VBN"], ["NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "RB"]]
|
first marco seems quite bitter country took provided scholarships helped succeed. would kissing ground thanks escaped decent place. often common reaction people rely largesse others. pew hispanic research poll years ago asked mexicans would immigrate could. fifty percent said would. would sixty million people. mexico. u.s. canada switzerland generally lead polls people would live could. governments responsibility protect borders. due desirability u.s. u.s. government particular responsibility. tell part people welcoming immigrants. want process appropriate background checks done number controlled. people like others jump line movie theatre freeway. like immigration arena either
|
["protecting", "border"]
|
protecting border
| 1
| 0
|
Robert
|
First, Marco seems quite bitter at the country that took him him, provided him scholarships, helped him succeed. I would be kissing the ground in thanks that I escaped to a decent place. This is often a common reaction from people who rely on the largesse of others. The Pew Hispanic Research poll a few years ago asked Mexicans if they would immigrate if they could. Fifty percent said they would. That would be sixty million people. That is just Mexico. The U.S., Canada, and Switzerland generally lead in the polls as to where people would live, if they could. Governments have the responsibility to protect their borders. Due to the desirability of the U.S., the U.S. government has a particular responsibility. From what I can tell, for the most part, people are welcoming of immigrants. They want a process where the appropriate background checks can be done, and the number can be controlled. People do not like it when others jump the line at the movie theatre or on the freeway. They do not like it in the immigration arena either.
|
immigration
|
A1315-P
|
immigration
| 0
| 3
| 2,187
| 15,992,159
|
[["first", "marco", "seems", "quite", "bitter", "country", "took", "provided", "scholarships", "helped", "succeed"], ["would", "kissing", "ground", "thanks", "escaped", "decent", "place"], ["often", "common", "reaction", "people", "rely", "largesse", "others"], ["pew", "hispanic", "research", "poll", "years", "ago", "asked", "mexicans", "would", "immigrate", "could"], ["fifty", "percent", "said", "would"], ["would", "sixty", "million", "people"], ["mexico"], ["u.s.", "canada", "switzerland", "generally", "lead", "polls", "people", "would", "live", "could"], ["governments", "responsibility", "protect", "borders"], ["due", "desirability", "u.s.", "u.s.", "government", "particular", "responsibility"], ["tell", "part", "people", "welcoming", "immigrants"], ["want", "process", "appropriate", "background", "checks", "done", "number", "controlled"], ["people", "like", "others", "jump", "line", "movie", "theatre", "freeway"], ["like", "immigration", "arena", "either"]]
|
[["RB", "NNP", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VBZ", "VBD", "VB"], ["MD", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBD", "NNPS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["CD", "NN", "VBD", "MD"], ["MD", "CD", "CD", "NNS"], ["NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VBP", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["IN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "VBN"], ["NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "RB"]]
|
first marco seems quite bitter country took provided scholarships helped succeed. would kissing ground thanks escaped decent place. often common reaction people rely largesse others. pew hispanic research poll years ago asked mexicans would immigrate could. fifty percent said would. would sixty million people. mexico. u.s. canada switzerland generally lead polls people would live could. governments responsibility protect borders. due desirability u.s. u.s. government particular responsibility. tell part people welcoming immigrants. want process appropriate background checks done number controlled. people like others jump line movie theatre freeway. like immigration arena either
|
["immigration"]
|
immigration
| 1
| 1
|
Robert
|
First, Marco seems quite bitter at the country that took him him, provided him scholarships, helped him succeed. I would be kissing the ground in thanks that I escaped to a decent place. This is often a common reaction from people who rely on the largesse of others. The Pew Hispanic Research poll a few years ago asked Mexicans if they would immigrate if they could. Fifty percent said they would. That would be sixty million people. That is just Mexico. The U.S., Canada, and Switzerland generally lead in the polls as to where people would live, if they could. Governments have the responsibility to protect their borders. Due to the desirability of the U.S., the U.S. government has a particular responsibility. From what I can tell, for the most part, people are welcoming of immigrants. They want a process where the appropriate background checks can be done, and the number can be controlled. People do not like it when others jump the line at the movie theatre or on the freeway. They do not like it in the immigration arena either.
|
immigration
|
A1315-P
|
government immigration control
| 1
| 2
| 2,188
| 15,992,159
|
[["first", "marco", "seems", "quite", "bitter", "country", "took", "provided", "scholarships", "helped", "succeed"], ["would", "kissing", "ground", "thanks", "escaped", "decent", "place"], ["often", "common", "reaction", "people", "rely", "largesse", "others"], ["pew", "hispanic", "research", "poll", "years", "ago", "asked", "mexicans", "would", "immigrate", "could"], ["fifty", "percent", "said", "would"], ["would", "sixty", "million", "people"], ["mexico"], ["u.s.", "canada", "switzerland", "generally", "lead", "polls", "people", "would", "live", "could"], ["governments", "responsibility", "protect", "borders"], ["due", "desirability", "u.s.", "u.s.", "government", "particular", "responsibility"], ["tell", "part", "people", "welcoming", "immigrants"], ["want", "process", "appropriate", "background", "checks", "done", "number", "controlled"], ["people", "like", "others", "jump", "line", "movie", "theatre", "freeway"], ["like", "immigration", "arena", "either"]]
|
[["RB", "NNP", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VBZ", "VBD", "VB"], ["MD", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBD", "NNPS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["CD", "NN", "VBD", "MD"], ["MD", "CD", "CD", "NNS"], ["NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VBP", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["IN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "VBN"], ["NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "RB"]]
|
first marco seems quite bitter country took provided scholarships helped succeed. would kissing ground thanks escaped decent place. often common reaction people rely largesse others. pew hispanic research poll years ago asked mexicans would immigrate could. fifty percent said would. would sixty million people. mexico. u.s. canada switzerland generally lead polls people would live could. governments responsibility protect borders. due desirability u.s. u.s. government particular responsibility. tell part people welcoming immigrants. want process appropriate background checks done number controlled. people like others jump line movie theatre freeway. like immigration arena either
|
["government", "immigration", "control"]
|
government immigration control
| 1
| 0
|
Robert
|
First, Marco seems quite bitter at the country that took him him, provided him scholarships, helped him succeed. I would be kissing the ground in thanks that I escaped to a decent place. This is often a common reaction from people who rely on the largesse of others. The Pew Hispanic Research poll a few years ago asked Mexicans if they would immigrate if they could. Fifty percent said they would. That would be sixty million people. That is just Mexico. The U.S., Canada, and Switzerland generally lead in the polls as to where people would live, if they could. Governments have the responsibility to protect their borders. Due to the desirability of the U.S., the U.S. government has a particular responsibility. From what I can tell, for the most part, people are welcoming of immigrants. They want a process where the appropriate background checks can be done, and the number can be controlled. People do not like it when others jump the line at the movie theatre or on the freeway. They do not like it in the immigration arena either.
|
immigration
|
A1315-P
|
illegal immigration
| 1
| 3
| 2,189
| 15,992,159
|
[["first", "marco", "seems", "quite", "bitter", "country", "took", "provided", "scholarships", "helped", "succeed"], ["would", "kissing", "ground", "thanks", "escaped", "decent", "place"], ["often", "common", "reaction", "people", "rely", "largesse", "others"], ["pew", "hispanic", "research", "poll", "years", "ago", "asked", "mexicans", "would", "immigrate", "could"], ["fifty", "percent", "said", "would"], ["would", "sixty", "million", "people"], ["mexico"], ["u.s.", "canada", "switzerland", "generally", "lead", "polls", "people", "would", "live", "could"], ["governments", "responsibility", "protect", "borders"], ["due", "desirability", "u.s.", "u.s.", "government", "particular", "responsibility"], ["tell", "part", "people", "welcoming", "immigrants"], ["want", "process", "appropriate", "background", "checks", "done", "number", "controlled"], ["people", "like", "others", "jump", "line", "movie", "theatre", "freeway"], ["like", "immigration", "arena", "either"]]
|
[["RB", "NNP", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VBZ", "VBD", "VB"], ["MD", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBD", "NNPS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["CD", "NN", "VBD", "MD"], ["MD", "CD", "CD", "NNS"], ["NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VBP", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["IN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "VBN"], ["NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "RB"]]
|
first marco seems quite bitter country took provided scholarships helped succeed. would kissing ground thanks escaped decent place. often common reaction people rely largesse others. pew hispanic research poll years ago asked mexicans would immigrate could. fifty percent said would. would sixty million people. mexico. u.s. canada switzerland generally lead polls people would live could. governments responsibility protect borders. due desirability u.s. u.s. government particular responsibility. tell part people welcoming immigrants. want process appropriate background checks done number controlled. people like others jump line movie theatre freeway. like immigration arena either
|
["illegal", "immigration"]
|
illegal immigration
| 1
| 0
|
Robert
|
First, Marco seems quite bitter at the country that took him him, provided him scholarships, helped him succeed. I would be kissing the ground in thanks that I escaped to a decent place. This is often a common reaction from people who rely on the largesse of others. The Pew Hispanic Research poll a few years ago asked Mexicans if they would immigrate if they could. Fifty percent said they would. That would be sixty million people. That is just Mexico. The U.S., Canada, and Switzerland generally lead in the polls as to where people would live, if they could. Governments have the responsibility to protect their borders. Due to the desirability of the U.S., the U.S. government has a particular responsibility. From what I can tell, for the most part, people are welcoming of immigrants. They want a process where the appropriate background checks can be done, and the number can be controlled. People do not like it when others jump the line at the movie theatre or on the freeway. They do not like it in the immigration arena either.
|
a problem
|
A1316-P
|
a problem
| 1
| 1
| 2,197
| 15,992,159
|
[["first", "marco", "seems", "quite", "bitter", "country", "took", "provided", "scholarships", "helped", "succeed"], ["would", "kissing", "ground", "thanks", "escaped", "decent", "place"], ["often", "common", "reaction", "people", "rely", "largesse", "others"], ["pew", "hispanic", "research", "poll", "years", "ago", "asked", "mexicans", "would", "immigrate", "could"], ["fifty", "percent", "said", "would"], ["would", "sixty", "million", "people"], ["mexico"], ["u.s.", "canada", "switzerland", "generally", "lead", "polls", "people", "would", "live", "could"], ["governments", "responsibility", "protect", "borders"], ["due", "desirability", "u.s.", "u.s.", "government", "particular", "responsibility"], ["tell", "part", "people", "welcoming", "immigrants"], ["want", "process", "appropriate", "background", "checks", "done", "number", "controlled"], ["people", "like", "others", "jump", "line", "movie", "theatre", "freeway"], ["like", "immigration", "arena", "either"]]
|
[["RB", "NNP", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VBZ", "VBD", "VB"], ["MD", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBD", "NNPS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["CD", "NN", "VBD", "MD"], ["MD", "CD", "CD", "NNS"], ["NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VBP", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["IN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "VBN"], ["NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "RB"]]
|
first marco seems quite bitter country took provided scholarships helped succeed. would kissing ground thanks escaped decent place. often common reaction people rely largesse others. pew hispanic research poll years ago asked mexicans would immigrate could. fifty percent said would. would sixty million people. mexico. u.s. canada switzerland generally lead polls people would live could. governments responsibility protect borders. due desirability u.s. u.s. government particular responsibility. tell part people welcoming immigrants. want process appropriate background checks done number controlled. people like others jump line movie theatre freeway. like immigration arena either
|
["problem"]
|
problem
| 1
| 0
|
Robert
|
First, Marco seems quite bitter at the country that took him him, provided him scholarships, helped him succeed. I would be kissing the ground in thanks that I escaped to a decent place. This is often a common reaction from people who rely on the largesse of others. The Pew Hispanic Research poll a few years ago asked Mexicans if they would immigrate if they could. Fifty percent said they would. That would be sixty million people. That is just Mexico. The U.S., Canada, and Switzerland generally lead in the polls as to where people would live, if they could. Governments have the responsibility to protect their borders. Due to the desirability of the U.S., the U.S. government has a particular responsibility. From what I can tell, for the most part, people are welcoming of immigrants. They want a process where the appropriate background checks can be done, and the number can be controlled. People do not like it when others jump the line at the movie theatre or on the freeway. They do not like it in the immigration arena either.
|
a problem
|
A1316-P
|
marco
| 1
| 3
| 2,198
| 15,992,159
|
[["first", "marco", "seems", "quite", "bitter", "country", "took", "provided", "scholarships", "helped", "succeed"], ["would", "kissing", "ground", "thanks", "escaped", "decent", "place"], ["often", "common", "reaction", "people", "rely", "largesse", "others"], ["pew", "hispanic", "research", "poll", "years", "ago", "asked", "mexicans", "would", "immigrate", "could"], ["fifty", "percent", "said", "would"], ["would", "sixty", "million", "people"], ["mexico"], ["u.s.", "canada", "switzerland", "generally", "lead", "polls", "people", "would", "live", "could"], ["governments", "responsibility", "protect", "borders"], ["due", "desirability", "u.s.", "u.s.", "government", "particular", "responsibility"], ["tell", "part", "people", "welcoming", "immigrants"], ["want", "process", "appropriate", "background", "checks", "done", "number", "controlled"], ["people", "like", "others", "jump", "line", "movie", "theatre", "freeway"], ["like", "immigration", "arena", "either"]]
|
[["RB", "NNP", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VBZ", "VBD", "VB"], ["MD", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBD", "NNPS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["CD", "NN", "VBD", "MD"], ["MD", "CD", "CD", "NNS"], ["NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VBP", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["IN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "VBN"], ["NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "RB"]]
|
first marco seems quite bitter country took provided scholarships helped succeed. would kissing ground thanks escaped decent place. often common reaction people rely largesse others. pew hispanic research poll years ago asked mexicans would immigrate could. fifty percent said would. would sixty million people. mexico. u.s. canada switzerland generally lead polls people would live could. governments responsibility protect borders. due desirability u.s. u.s. government particular responsibility. tell part people welcoming immigrants. want process appropriate background checks done number controlled. people like others jump line movie theatre freeway. like immigration arena either
|
["marco"]
|
marco
| 1
| 1
|
Robert
|
First, Marco seems quite bitter at the country that took him him, provided him scholarships, helped him succeed. I would be kissing the ground in thanks that I escaped to a decent place. This is often a common reaction from people who rely on the largesse of others. The Pew Hispanic Research poll a few years ago asked Mexicans if they would immigrate if they could. Fifty percent said they would. That would be sixty million people. That is just Mexico. The U.S., Canada, and Switzerland generally lead in the polls as to where people would live, if they could. Governments have the responsibility to protect their borders. Due to the desirability of the U.S., the U.S. government has a particular responsibility. From what I can tell, for the most part, people are welcoming of immigrants. They want a process where the appropriate background checks can be done, and the number can be controlled. People do not like it when others jump the line at the movie theatre or on the freeway. They do not like it in the immigration arena either.
|
a problem
|
A1316-P
|
immigration
| 0
| 2
| 2,199
| 15,992,159
|
[["first", "marco", "seems", "quite", "bitter", "country", "took", "provided", "scholarships", "helped", "succeed"], ["would", "kissing", "ground", "thanks", "escaped", "decent", "place"], ["often", "common", "reaction", "people", "rely", "largesse", "others"], ["pew", "hispanic", "research", "poll", "years", "ago", "asked", "mexicans", "would", "immigrate", "could"], ["fifty", "percent", "said", "would"], ["would", "sixty", "million", "people"], ["mexico"], ["u.s.", "canada", "switzerland", "generally", "lead", "polls", "people", "would", "live", "could"], ["governments", "responsibility", "protect", "borders"], ["due", "desirability", "u.s.", "u.s.", "government", "particular", "responsibility"], ["tell", "part", "people", "welcoming", "immigrants"], ["want", "process", "appropriate", "background", "checks", "done", "number", "controlled"], ["people", "like", "others", "jump", "line", "movie", "theatre", "freeway"], ["like", "immigration", "arena", "either"]]
|
[["RB", "NNP", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VBZ", "VBD", "VB"], ["MD", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBD", "NNPS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["CD", "NN", "VBD", "MD"], ["MD", "CD", "CD", "NNS"], ["NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VBP", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["IN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "VBN"], ["NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "RB"]]
|
first marco seems quite bitter country took provided scholarships helped succeed. would kissing ground thanks escaped decent place. often common reaction people rely largesse others. pew hispanic research poll years ago asked mexicans would immigrate could. fifty percent said would. would sixty million people. mexico. u.s. canada switzerland generally lead polls people would live could. governments responsibility protect borders. due desirability u.s. u.s. government particular responsibility. tell part people welcoming immigrants. want process appropriate background checks done number controlled. people like others jump line movie theatre freeway. like immigration arena either
|
["immigration"]
|
immigration
| 1
| 1
|
Robert
|
First, Marco seems quite bitter at the country that took him him, provided him scholarships, helped him succeed. I would be kissing the ground in thanks that I escaped to a decent place. This is often a common reaction from people who rely on the largesse of others. The Pew Hispanic Research poll a few years ago asked Mexicans if they would immigrate if they could. Fifty percent said they would. That would be sixty million people. That is just Mexico. The U.S., Canada, and Switzerland generally lead in the polls as to where people would live, if they could. Governments have the responsibility to protect their borders. Due to the desirability of the U.S., the U.S. government has a particular responsibility. From what I can tell, for the most part, people are welcoming of immigrants. They want a process where the appropriate background checks can be done, and the number can be controlled. People do not like it when others jump the line at the movie theatre or on the freeway. They do not like it in the immigration arena either.
|
a problem
|
A1316-P
|
marco
| 0
| 3
| 2,200
| 15,992,159
|
[["first", "marco", "seems", "quite", "bitter", "country", "took", "provided", "scholarships", "helped", "succeed"], ["would", "kissing", "ground", "thanks", "escaped", "decent", "place"], ["often", "common", "reaction", "people", "rely", "largesse", "others"], ["pew", "hispanic", "research", "poll", "years", "ago", "asked", "mexicans", "would", "immigrate", "could"], ["fifty", "percent", "said", "would"], ["would", "sixty", "million", "people"], ["mexico"], ["u.s.", "canada", "switzerland", "generally", "lead", "polls", "people", "would", "live", "could"], ["governments", "responsibility", "protect", "borders"], ["due", "desirability", "u.s.", "u.s.", "government", "particular", "responsibility"], ["tell", "part", "people", "welcoming", "immigrants"], ["want", "process", "appropriate", "background", "checks", "done", "number", "controlled"], ["people", "like", "others", "jump", "line", "movie", "theatre", "freeway"], ["like", "immigration", "arena", "either"]]
|
[["RB", "NNP", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VBZ", "VBD", "VB"], ["MD", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBD", "NNPS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["CD", "NN", "VBD", "MD"], ["MD", "CD", "CD", "NNS"], ["NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VBP", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "MD"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["IN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "VBN"], ["NNS", "VB", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "RB"]]
|
first marco seems quite bitter country took provided scholarships helped succeed. would kissing ground thanks escaped decent place. often common reaction people rely largesse others. pew hispanic research poll years ago asked mexicans would immigrate could. fifty percent said would. would sixty million people. mexico. u.s. canada switzerland generally lead polls people would live could. governments responsibility protect borders. due desirability u.s. u.s. government particular responsibility. tell part people welcoming immigrants. want process appropriate background checks done number controlled. people like others jump line movie theatre freeway. like immigration arena either
|
["marco"]
|
marco
| 1
| 1
|
Barbara
|
I just returned from 3 wonderful weeks in Japan. Part of what made it wonderful was not that I didn't have to tip (I was told it would have insulted service personnel), but that the service was uniformly, 100% outstanding no matter what city or village I was in, no matter the type of service establishment. The whole experience was a delight.
|
restaurants
|
A3341-P
|
japanese attendance
| 1
| 2
| 16,849
| 9,307,487
|
[["returned", "3", "wonderful", "weeks", "japan"], ["part", "made", "wonderful", "n't", "tip", "told", "would", "insulted", "service", "personnel", "service", "uniformly", "100", "outstanding", "matter", "city", "village", "matter", "type", "service", "establishment"], ["whole", "experience", "delight"]]
|
[["VBD", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP"], ["NN", "VBD", "JJ", "RB", "VB", "VBN", "MD", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "RB", "CD", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
|
returned 3 wonderful weeks japan. part made wonderful n't tip told would insulted service personnel service uniformly 100 outstanding matter city village matter type service establishment. whole experience delight
|
["japanese", "attendance"]
|
japanese attendance
| 1
| 0
|
Barbara
|
I just returned from 3 wonderful weeks in Japan. Part of what made it wonderful was not that I didn't have to tip (I was told it would have insulted service personnel), but that the service was uniformly, 100% outstanding no matter what city or village I was in, no matter the type of service establishment. The whole experience was a delight.
|
restaurants
|
A3341-P
|
restaurant
| 1
| 3
| 16,850
| 9,307,487
|
[["returned", "3", "wonderful", "weeks", "japan"], ["part", "made", "wonderful", "n't", "tip", "told", "would", "insulted", "service", "personnel", "service", "uniformly", "100", "outstanding", "matter", "city", "village", "matter", "type", "service", "establishment"], ["whole", "experience", "delight"]]
|
[["VBD", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP"], ["NN", "VBD", "JJ", "RB", "VB", "VBN", "MD", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "RB", "CD", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
|
returned 3 wonderful weeks japan. part made wonderful n't tip told would insulted service personnel service uniformly 100 outstanding matter city village matter type service establishment. whole experience delight
|
["restaurant"]
|
restaurant
| 1
| 0
|
DAN
|
There is another way that our population growth will be our undoing: There are not enough meaningful jobs on the planet for the number of people who are already on it. With our efficiencies in production, and the limits to natural resources, this problem will get worse over time. We do have a population problem, a serious one, but it is more than just numbers and how to feed them. We can make it so large numbers of people do not die, but that doesn't mean this planet can be manipulated so that those same large number of people can truly live.
|
a legitimate threat
|
A1732-P
|
a legitimate threat
| 0
| 1
| 1,418
| 15,164,771
|
[["another", "way", "population", "growth", "undoing", "enough", "meaningful", "jobs", "planet", "number", "people", "already"], ["efficiencies", "production", "limits", "natural", "resources", "problem", "get", "worse", "time"], ["population", "problem", "serious", "one", "numbers", "feed"], ["make", "large", "numbers", "people", "die", "n't", "mean", "planet", "manipulated", "large", "number", "people", "truly", "live"]]
|
[["DT", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB"], ["NNS", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB"]]
|
another way population growth undoing enough meaningful jobs planet number people already. efficiencies production limits natural resources problem get worse time. population problem serious one numbers feed. make large numbers people die n't mean planet manipulated large number people truly live
|
["legitimate", "threat"]
|
legitimate threat
| 1
| 0
|
DAN
|
There is another way that our population growth will be our undoing: There are not enough meaningful jobs on the planet for the number of people who are already on it. With our efficiencies in production, and the limits to natural resources, this problem will get worse over time. We do have a population problem, a serious one, but it is more than just numbers and how to feed them. We can make it so large numbers of people do not die, but that doesn't mean this planet can be manipulated so that those same large number of people can truly live.
|
a legitimate threat
|
A1732-P
|
employment
| 0
| 3
| 1,419
| 15,164,771
|
[["another", "way", "population", "growth", "undoing", "enough", "meaningful", "jobs", "planet", "number", "people", "already"], ["efficiencies", "production", "limits", "natural", "resources", "problem", "get", "worse", "time"], ["population", "problem", "serious", "one", "numbers", "feed"], ["make", "large", "numbers", "people", "die", "n't", "mean", "planet", "manipulated", "large", "number", "people", "truly", "live"]]
|
[["DT", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB"], ["NNS", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB"]]
|
another way population growth undoing enough meaningful jobs planet number people already. efficiencies production limits natural resources problem get worse time. population problem serious one numbers feed. make large numbers people die n't mean planet manipulated large number people truly live
|
["employment"]
|
employment
| 1
| 0
|
DAN
|
There is another way that our population growth will be our undoing: There are not enough meaningful jobs on the planet for the number of people who are already on it. With our efficiencies in production, and the limits to natural resources, this problem will get worse over time. We do have a population problem, a serious one, but it is more than just numbers and how to feed them. We can make it so large numbers of people do not die, but that doesn't mean this planet can be manipulated so that those same large number of people can truly live.
|
a legitimate threat
|
A1732-P
|
population growth
| 0
| 3
| 1,420
| 15,164,771
|
[["another", "way", "population", "growth", "undoing", "enough", "meaningful", "jobs", "planet", "number", "people", "already"], ["efficiencies", "production", "limits", "natural", "resources", "problem", "get", "worse", "time"], ["population", "problem", "serious", "one", "numbers", "feed"], ["make", "large", "numbers", "people", "die", "n't", "mean", "planet", "manipulated", "large", "number", "people", "truly", "live"]]
|
[["DT", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB"], ["NNS", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB"]]
|
another way population growth undoing enough meaningful jobs planet number people already. efficiencies production limits natural resources problem get worse time. population problem serious one numbers feed. make large numbers people die n't mean planet manipulated large number people truly live
|
["population", "growth"]
|
population growth
| 1
| 1
|
DAN
|
There is another way that our population growth will be our undoing: There are not enough meaningful jobs on the planet for the number of people who are already on it. With our efficiencies in production, and the limits to natural resources, this problem will get worse over time. We do have a population problem, a serious one, but it is more than just numbers and how to feed them. We can make it so large numbers of people do not die, but that doesn't mean this planet can be manipulated so that those same large number of people can truly live.
|
overcrowding
|
A1731-P
|
overcrowding
| 0
| 1
| 1,797
| 15,164,771
|
[["another", "way", "population", "growth", "undoing", "enough", "meaningful", "jobs", "planet", "number", "people", "already"], ["efficiencies", "production", "limits", "natural", "resources", "problem", "get", "worse", "time"], ["population", "problem", "serious", "one", "numbers", "feed"], ["make", "large", "numbers", "people", "die", "n't", "mean", "planet", "manipulated", "large", "number", "people", "truly", "live"]]
|
[["DT", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB"], ["NNS", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB"]]
|
another way population growth undoing enough meaningful jobs planet number people already. efficiencies production limits natural resources problem get worse time. population problem serious one numbers feed. make large numbers people die n't mean planet manipulated large number people truly live
|
["overcrowding"]
|
overcrowding
| 1
| 0
|
DAN
|
There is another way that our population growth will be our undoing: There are not enough meaningful jobs on the planet for the number of people who are already on it. With our efficiencies in production, and the limits to natural resources, this problem will get worse over time. We do have a population problem, a serious one, but it is more than just numbers and how to feed them. We can make it so large numbers of people do not die, but that doesn't mean this planet can be manipulated so that those same large number of people can truly live.
|
overcrowding
|
A1731-P
|
overpopulation
| 0
| 3
| 1,798
| 15,164,771
|
[["another", "way", "population", "growth", "undoing", "enough", "meaningful", "jobs", "planet", "number", "people", "already"], ["efficiencies", "production", "limits", "natural", "resources", "problem", "get", "worse", "time"], ["population", "problem", "serious", "one", "numbers", "feed"], ["make", "large", "numbers", "people", "die", "n't", "mean", "planet", "manipulated", "large", "number", "people", "truly", "live"]]
|
[["DT", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB"], ["NNS", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB"]]
|
another way population growth undoing enough meaningful jobs planet number people already. efficiencies production limits natural resources problem get worse time. population problem serious one numbers feed. make large numbers people die n't mean planet manipulated large number people truly live
|
["overpopulation"]
|
overpopulation
| 1
| 0
|
DAN
|
There is another way that our population growth will be our undoing: There are not enough meaningful jobs on the planet for the number of people who are already on it. With our efficiencies in production, and the limits to natural resources, this problem will get worse over time. We do have a population problem, a serious one, but it is more than just numbers and how to feed them. We can make it so large numbers of people do not die, but that doesn't mean this planet can be manipulated so that those same large number of people can truly live.
|
overcrowding
|
A1731-P
|
overcrowd
| 2
| 2
| 1,799
| 15,164,771
|
[["another", "way", "population", "growth", "undoing", "enough", "meaningful", "jobs", "planet", "number", "people", "already"], ["efficiencies", "production", "limits", "natural", "resources", "problem", "get", "worse", "time"], ["population", "problem", "serious", "one", "numbers", "feed"], ["make", "large", "numbers", "people", "die", "n't", "mean", "planet", "manipulated", "large", "number", "people", "truly", "live"]]
|
[["DT", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB"], ["NNS", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB"]]
|
another way population growth undoing enough meaningful jobs planet number people already. efficiencies production limits natural resources problem get worse time. population problem serious one numbers feed. make large numbers people die n't mean planet manipulated large number people truly live
|
["overcrowd"]
|
overcrowd
| 1
| 0
|
DAN
|
There is another way that our population growth will be our undoing: There are not enough meaningful jobs on the planet for the number of people who are already on it. With our efficiencies in production, and the limits to natural resources, this problem will get worse over time. We do have a population problem, a serious one, but it is more than just numbers and how to feed them. We can make it so large numbers of people do not die, but that doesn't mean this planet can be manipulated so that those same large number of people can truly live.
|
overcrowding
|
A1731-P
|
population growth
| 2
| 3
| 1,800
| 15,164,771
|
[["another", "way", "population", "growth", "undoing", "enough", "meaningful", "jobs", "planet", "number", "people", "already"], ["efficiencies", "production", "limits", "natural", "resources", "problem", "get", "worse", "time"], ["population", "problem", "serious", "one", "numbers", "feed"], ["make", "large", "numbers", "people", "die", "n't", "mean", "planet", "manipulated", "large", "number", "people", "truly", "live"]]
|
[["DT", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB"], ["NNS", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB"]]
|
another way population growth undoing enough meaningful jobs planet number people already. efficiencies production limits natural resources problem get worse time. population problem serious one numbers feed. make large numbers people die n't mean planet manipulated large number people truly live
|
["population", "growth"]
|
population growth
| 1
| 1
|
Peter Lynn
|
"But I certainly would fire any of my employees who would consider flag-burning as an act of defiance. It's not. It's childish and immature behavior, and those who would do such a thing would be unworthy of public employment." Actually, I once told my wife that if an amendment were actually passed banning flag-burning, I would burn one the next day on the steps of the Supreme Court. It's not necessarily an act of childish defiance; it can be an all-in statement of what is important about this country. By the way, flag-burning is required by law. Last time I looked, it was the only proper way to dispose of a flag too worn to be flown any more.
|
speech
|
A1123-P
|
speech
| 1
| 1
| 3,244
| 2,565,476
|
[["certainly", "would", "fire", "employees", "would", "consider", "flag", "burning", "act", "defiance"], ["'s"], ["'s", "childish", "immature", "behavior", "would", "thing", "would", "unworthy", "public", "employment"], ["actually", "told", "wife", "amendment", "actually", "passed", "banning", "flag", "burning", "would", "burn", "one", "next", "day", "steps", "supreme", "court"], ["'s", "necessarily", "act", "childish", "defiance", "statement", "important", "country"], ["way", "flag", "burning", "required", "law"], ["last", "time", "looked", "proper", "way", "dispose", "flag", "worn", "flown"]]
|
[["RB", "MD", "VB", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "NN", "MD", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VBN"]]
|
certainly would fire employees would consider flag burning act defiance. 's. 's childish immature behavior would thing would unworthy public employment. actually told wife amendment actually passed banning flag burning would burn one next day steps supreme court. 's necessarily act childish defiance statement important country. way flag burning required law. last time looked proper way dispose flag worn flown
|
["speech"]
|
speech
| 1
| 0
|
Peter Lynn
|
"But I certainly would fire any of my employees who would consider flag-burning as an act of defiance. It's not. It's childish and immature behavior, and those who would do such a thing would be unworthy of public employment." Actually, I once told my wife that if an amendment were actually passed banning flag-burning, I would burn one the next day on the steps of the Supreme Court. It's not necessarily an act of childish defiance; it can be an all-in statement of what is important about this country. By the way, flag-burning is required by law. Last time I looked, it was the only proper way to dispose of a flag too worn to be flown any more.
|
speech
|
A1123-P
|
flag burning
| 1
| 3
| 3,245
| 2,565,476
|
[["certainly", "would", "fire", "employees", "would", "consider", "flag", "burning", "act", "defiance"], ["'s"], ["'s", "childish", "immature", "behavior", "would", "thing", "would", "unworthy", "public", "employment"], ["actually", "told", "wife", "amendment", "actually", "passed", "banning", "flag", "burning", "would", "burn", "one", "next", "day", "steps", "supreme", "court"], ["'s", "necessarily", "act", "childish", "defiance", "statement", "important", "country"], ["way", "flag", "burning", "required", "law"], ["last", "time", "looked", "proper", "way", "dispose", "flag", "worn", "flown"]]
|
[["RB", "MD", "VB", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "NN", "MD", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VBN"]]
|
certainly would fire employees would consider flag burning act defiance. 's. 's childish immature behavior would thing would unworthy public employment. actually told wife amendment actually passed banning flag burning would burn one next day steps supreme court. 's necessarily act childish defiance statement important country. way flag burning required law. last time looked proper way dispose flag worn flown
|
["flag", "burning"]
|
flag burning
| 1
| 1
|
Peter Lynn
|
"But I certainly would fire any of my employees who would consider flag-burning as an act of defiance. It's not. It's childish and immature behavior, and those who would do such a thing would be unworthy of public employment." Actually, I once told my wife that if an amendment were actually passed banning flag-burning, I would burn one the next day on the steps of the Supreme Court. It's not necessarily an act of childish defiance; it can be an all-in statement of what is important about this country. By the way, flag-burning is required by law. Last time I looked, it was the only proper way to dispose of a flag too worn to be flown any more.
|
speech
|
A1123-P
|
flag-burning
| 0
| 2
| 3,246
| 2,565,476
|
[["certainly", "would", "fire", "employees", "would", "consider", "flag", "burning", "act", "defiance"], ["'s"], ["'s", "childish", "immature", "behavior", "would", "thing", "would", "unworthy", "public", "employment"], ["actually", "told", "wife", "amendment", "actually", "passed", "banning", "flag", "burning", "would", "burn", "one", "next", "day", "steps", "supreme", "court"], ["'s", "necessarily", "act", "childish", "defiance", "statement", "important", "country"], ["way", "flag", "burning", "required", "law"], ["last", "time", "looked", "proper", "way", "dispose", "flag", "worn", "flown"]]
|
[["RB", "MD", "VB", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "NN", "MD", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VBN"]]
|
certainly would fire employees would consider flag burning act defiance. 's. 's childish immature behavior would thing would unworthy public employment. actually told wife amendment actually passed banning flag burning would burn one next day steps supreme court. 's necessarily act childish defiance statement important country. way flag burning required law. last time looked proper way dispose flag worn flown
|
["flag", "burning"]
|
flag burning
| 1
| 1
|
Peter Lynn
|
"But I certainly would fire any of my employees who would consider flag-burning as an act of defiance. It's not. It's childish and immature behavior, and those who would do such a thing would be unworthy of public employment." Actually, I once told my wife that if an amendment were actually passed banning flag-burning, I would burn one the next day on the steps of the Supreme Court. It's not necessarily an act of childish defiance; it can be an all-in statement of what is important about this country. By the way, flag-burning is required by law. Last time I looked, it was the only proper way to dispose of a flag too worn to be flown any more.
|
speech
|
A1123-P
|
law
| 0
| 3
| 3,247
| 2,565,476
|
[["certainly", "would", "fire", "employees", "would", "consider", "flag", "burning", "act", "defiance"], ["'s"], ["'s", "childish", "immature", "behavior", "would", "thing", "would", "unworthy", "public", "employment"], ["actually", "told", "wife", "amendment", "actually", "passed", "banning", "flag", "burning", "would", "burn", "one", "next", "day", "steps", "supreme", "court"], ["'s", "necessarily", "act", "childish", "defiance", "statement", "important", "country"], ["way", "flag", "burning", "required", "law"], ["last", "time", "looked", "proper", "way", "dispose", "flag", "worn", "flown"]]
|
[["RB", "MD", "VB", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "NN", "MD", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VBN"]]
|
certainly would fire employees would consider flag burning act defiance. 's. 's childish immature behavior would thing would unworthy public employment. actually told wife amendment actually passed banning flag burning would burn one next day steps supreme court. 's necessarily act childish defiance statement important country. way flag burning required law. last time looked proper way dispose flag worn flown
|
["law"]
|
law
| 1
| 1
|
Peter Lynn
|
"But I certainly would fire any of my employees who would consider flag-burning as an act of defiance. It's not. It's childish and immature behavior, and those who would do such a thing would be unworthy of public employment." Actually, I once told my wife that if an amendment were actually passed banning flag-burning, I would burn one the next day on the steps of the Supreme Court. It's not necessarily an act of childish defiance; it can be an all-in statement of what is important about this country. By the way, flag-burning is required by law. Last time I looked, it was the only proper way to dispose of a flag too worn to be flown any more.
|
speech
|
A1123-P
|
employer's choices
| 1
| 3
| 3,248
| 2,565,476
|
[["certainly", "would", "fire", "employees", "would", "consider", "flag", "burning", "act", "defiance"], ["'s"], ["'s", "childish", "immature", "behavior", "would", "thing", "would", "unworthy", "public", "employment"], ["actually", "told", "wife", "amendment", "actually", "passed", "banning", "flag", "burning", "would", "burn", "one", "next", "day", "steps", "supreme", "court"], ["'s", "necessarily", "act", "childish", "defiance", "statement", "important", "country"], ["way", "flag", "burning", "required", "law"], ["last", "time", "looked", "proper", "way", "dispose", "flag", "worn", "flown"]]
|
[["RB", "MD", "VB", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "NN", "MD", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VBN"]]
|
certainly would fire employees would consider flag burning act defiance. 's. 's childish immature behavior would thing would unworthy public employment. actually told wife amendment actually passed banning flag burning would burn one next day steps supreme court. 's necessarily act childish defiance statement important country. way flag burning required law. last time looked proper way dispose flag worn flown
|
["employer", "'s", "choice"]
|
employer 's choice
| 1
| 0
|
Peter Lynn
|
"But I certainly would fire any of my employees who would consider flag-burning as an act of defiance. It's not. It's childish and immature behavior, and those who would do such a thing would be unworthy of public employment." Actually, I once told my wife that if an amendment were actually passed banning flag-burning, I would burn one the next day on the steps of the Supreme Court. It's not necessarily an act of childish defiance; it can be an all-in statement of what is important about this country. By the way, flag-burning is required by law. Last time I looked, it was the only proper way to dispose of a flag too worn to be flown any more.
|
public workers
|
A1124-P
|
public workers
| 1
| 1
| 3,253
| 2,565,476
|
[["certainly", "would", "fire", "employees", "would", "consider", "flag", "burning", "act", "defiance"], ["'s"], ["'s", "childish", "immature", "behavior", "would", "thing", "would", "unworthy", "public", "employment"], ["actually", "told", "wife", "amendment", "actually", "passed", "banning", "flag", "burning", "would", "burn", "one", "next", "day", "steps", "supreme", "court"], ["'s", "necessarily", "act", "childish", "defiance", "statement", "important", "country"], ["way", "flag", "burning", "required", "law"], ["last", "time", "looked", "proper", "way", "dispose", "flag", "worn", "flown"]]
|
[["RB", "MD", "VB", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "NN", "MD", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VBN"]]
|
certainly would fire employees would consider flag burning act defiance. 's. 's childish immature behavior would thing would unworthy public employment. actually told wife amendment actually passed banning flag burning would burn one next day steps supreme court. 's necessarily act childish defiance statement important country. way flag burning required law. last time looked proper way dispose flag worn flown
|
["public", "worker"]
|
public worker
| 1
| 0
|
Peter Lynn
|
"But I certainly would fire any of my employees who would consider flag-burning as an act of defiance. It's not. It's childish and immature behavior, and those who would do such a thing would be unworthy of public employment." Actually, I once told my wife that if an amendment were actually passed banning flag-burning, I would burn one the next day on the steps of the Supreme Court. It's not necessarily an act of childish defiance; it can be an all-in statement of what is important about this country. By the way, flag-burning is required by law. Last time I looked, it was the only proper way to dispose of a flag too worn to be flown any more.
|
public workers
|
A1124-P
|
flag burning
| 1
| 3
| 3,254
| 2,565,476
|
[["certainly", "would", "fire", "employees", "would", "consider", "flag", "burning", "act", "defiance"], ["'s"], ["'s", "childish", "immature", "behavior", "would", "thing", "would", "unworthy", "public", "employment"], ["actually", "told", "wife", "amendment", "actually", "passed", "banning", "flag", "burning", "would", "burn", "one", "next", "day", "steps", "supreme", "court"], ["'s", "necessarily", "act", "childish", "defiance", "statement", "important", "country"], ["way", "flag", "burning", "required", "law"], ["last", "time", "looked", "proper", "way", "dispose", "flag", "worn", "flown"]]
|
[["RB", "MD", "VB", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "NN", "MD", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VBN"]]
|
certainly would fire employees would consider flag burning act defiance. 's. 's childish immature behavior would thing would unworthy public employment. actually told wife amendment actually passed banning flag burning would burn one next day steps supreme court. 's necessarily act childish defiance statement important country. way flag burning required law. last time looked proper way dispose flag worn flown
|
["flag", "burning"]
|
flag burning
| 1
| 1
|
Peter Lynn
|
"But I certainly would fire any of my employees who would consider flag-burning as an act of defiance. It's not. It's childish and immature behavior, and those who would do such a thing would be unworthy of public employment." Actually, I once told my wife that if an amendment were actually passed banning flag-burning, I would burn one the next day on the steps of the Supreme Court. It's not necessarily an act of childish defiance; it can be an all-in statement of what is important about this country. By the way, flag-burning is required by law. Last time I looked, it was the only proper way to dispose of a flag too worn to be flown any more.
|
public workers
|
A1124-P
|
flag-burning
| 1
| 2
| 3,255
| 2,565,476
|
[["certainly", "would", "fire", "employees", "would", "consider", "flag", "burning", "act", "defiance"], ["'s"], ["'s", "childish", "immature", "behavior", "would", "thing", "would", "unworthy", "public", "employment"], ["actually", "told", "wife", "amendment", "actually", "passed", "banning", "flag", "burning", "would", "burn", "one", "next", "day", "steps", "supreme", "court"], ["'s", "necessarily", "act", "childish", "defiance", "statement", "important", "country"], ["way", "flag", "burning", "required", "law"], ["last", "time", "looked", "proper", "way", "dispose", "flag", "worn", "flown"]]
|
[["RB", "MD", "VB", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "NN", "MD", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VBN"]]
|
certainly would fire employees would consider flag burning act defiance. 's. 's childish immature behavior would thing would unworthy public employment. actually told wife amendment actually passed banning flag burning would burn one next day steps supreme court. 's necessarily act childish defiance statement important country. way flag burning required law. last time looked proper way dispose flag worn flown
|
["flag", "burning"]
|
flag burning
| 1
| 1
|
Peter Lynn
|
"But I certainly would fire any of my employees who would consider flag-burning as an act of defiance. It's not. It's childish and immature behavior, and those who would do such a thing would be unworthy of public employment." Actually, I once told my wife that if an amendment were actually passed banning flag-burning, I would burn one the next day on the steps of the Supreme Court. It's not necessarily an act of childish defiance; it can be an all-in statement of what is important about this country. By the way, flag-burning is required by law. Last time I looked, it was the only proper way to dispose of a flag too worn to be flown any more.
|
public workers
|
A1124-P
|
supreme court
| 1
| 3
| 3,256
| 2,565,476
|
[["certainly", "would", "fire", "employees", "would", "consider", "flag", "burning", "act", "defiance"], ["'s"], ["'s", "childish", "immature", "behavior", "would", "thing", "would", "unworthy", "public", "employment"], ["actually", "told", "wife", "amendment", "actually", "passed", "banning", "flag", "burning", "would", "burn", "one", "next", "day", "steps", "supreme", "court"], ["'s", "necessarily", "act", "childish", "defiance", "statement", "important", "country"], ["way", "flag", "burning", "required", "law"], ["last", "time", "looked", "proper", "way", "dispose", "flag", "worn", "flown"]]
|
[["RB", "MD", "VB", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "NN", "MD", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VBN"]]
|
certainly would fire employees would consider flag burning act defiance. 's. 's childish immature behavior would thing would unworthy public employment. actually told wife amendment actually passed banning flag burning would burn one next day steps supreme court. 's necessarily act childish defiance statement important country. way flag burning required law. last time looked proper way dispose flag worn flown
|
["supreme", "court"]
|
supreme court
| 1
| 1
|
Peter Lynn
|
"But I certainly would fire any of my employees who would consider flag-burning as an act of defiance. It's not. It's childish and immature behavior, and those who would do such a thing would be unworthy of public employment." Actually, I once told my wife that if an amendment were actually passed banning flag-burning, I would burn one the next day on the steps of the Supreme Court. It's not necessarily an act of childish defiance; it can be an all-in statement of what is important about this country. By the way, flag-burning is required by law. Last time I looked, it was the only proper way to dispose of a flag too worn to be flown any more.
|
public workers
|
A1124-P
|
employer's choices
| 1
| 3
| 3,257
| 2,565,476
|
[["certainly", "would", "fire", "employees", "would", "consider", "flag", "burning", "act", "defiance"], ["'s"], ["'s", "childish", "immature", "behavior", "would", "thing", "would", "unworthy", "public", "employment"], ["actually", "told", "wife", "amendment", "actually", "passed", "banning", "flag", "burning", "would", "burn", "one", "next", "day", "steps", "supreme", "court"], ["'s", "necessarily", "act", "childish", "defiance", "statement", "important", "country"], ["way", "flag", "burning", "required", "law"], ["last", "time", "looked", "proper", "way", "dispose", "flag", "worn", "flown"]]
|
[["RB", "MD", "VB", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "NN", "MD", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VBN"]]
|
certainly would fire employees would consider flag burning act defiance. 's. 's childish immature behavior would thing would unworthy public employment. actually told wife amendment actually passed banning flag burning would burn one next day steps supreme court. 's necessarily act childish defiance statement important country. way flag burning required law. last time looked proper way dispose flag worn flown
|
["employer", "'s", "choice"]
|
employer 's choice
| 1
| 0
|
Andy
|
The technology we have today isn't a product of our population. Think how well we could be living now if we hadn't deforested our lands, polluted our waters, degraded our soils and overtaxed our aquifers and rivers. Would the middle east seem so intractable a problem if there was still plenty of water and arable land available; if the population of the region was just a fraction of what it is today? Think of the vast advances civilization made in the first and second millenniums with less than a billion people living on this planet. If birth control had been practiced earlier in our history would we be any less advanced a civilization?
|
a legitimate threat
|
A1712-P
|
a legitimate threat
| 0
| 1
| 10,706
| 15,164,781
|
[["technology", "today", "n't", "product", "population"], ["think", "well", "could", "living", "n't", "deforested", "lands", "polluted", "waters", "degraded", "soils", "overtaxed", "aquifers", "rivers"], ["would", "middle", "east", "seem", "intractable", "problem", "still", "plenty", "water", "arable", "land", "available", "population", "region", "fraction", "today"], ["think", "vast", "advances", "civilization", "made", "first", "second", "millenniums", "less", "billion", "people", "living", "planet"], ["birth", "control", "practiced", "earlier", "history", "would", "less", "advanced", "civilization"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "RB", "MD", "VBG", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NNS"], ["MD", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJR", "CD", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "RBR", "NN", "MD", "RBR", "JJ", "NN"]]
|
technology today n't product population. think well could living n't deforested lands polluted waters degraded soils overtaxed aquifers rivers. would middle east seem intractable problem still plenty water arable land available population region fraction today. think vast advances civilization made first second millenniums less billion people living planet. birth control practiced earlier history would less advanced civilization
|
["legitimate", "threat"]
|
legitimate threat
| 1
| 0
|
Andy
|
The technology we have today isn't a product of our population. Think how well we could be living now if we hadn't deforested our lands, polluted our waters, degraded our soils and overtaxed our aquifers and rivers. Would the middle east seem so intractable a problem if there was still plenty of water and arable land available; if the population of the region was just a fraction of what it is today? Think of the vast advances civilization made in the first and second millenniums with less than a billion people living on this planet. If birth control had been practiced earlier in our history would we be any less advanced a civilization?
|
a legitimate threat
|
A1712-P
|
earth's over - population
| 0
| 3
| 10,707
| 15,164,781
|
[["technology", "today", "n't", "product", "population"], ["think", "well", "could", "living", "n't", "deforested", "lands", "polluted", "waters", "degraded", "soils", "overtaxed", "aquifers", "rivers"], ["would", "middle", "east", "seem", "intractable", "problem", "still", "plenty", "water", "arable", "land", "available", "population", "region", "fraction", "today"], ["think", "vast", "advances", "civilization", "made", "first", "second", "millenniums", "less", "billion", "people", "living", "planet"], ["birth", "control", "practiced", "earlier", "history", "would", "less", "advanced", "civilization"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "RB", "MD", "VBG", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NNS"], ["MD", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJR", "CD", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "RBR", "NN", "MD", "RBR", "JJ", "NN"]]
|
technology today n't product population. think well could living n't deforested lands polluted waters degraded soils overtaxed aquifers rivers. would middle east seem intractable problem still plenty water arable land available population region fraction today. think vast advances civilization made first second millenniums less billion people living planet. birth control practiced earlier history would less advanced civilization
|
["earth", "'s", "population"]
|
earth 's population
| 1
| 0
|
Andy
|
The technology we have today isn't a product of our population. Think how well we could be living now if we hadn't deforested our lands, polluted our waters, degraded our soils and overtaxed our aquifers and rivers. Would the middle east seem so intractable a problem if there was still plenty of water and arable land available; if the population of the region was just a fraction of what it is today? Think of the vast advances civilization made in the first and second millenniums with less than a billion people living on this planet. If birth control had been practiced earlier in our history would we be any less advanced a civilization?
|
a legitimate threat
|
A1712-P
|
conservation
| 1
| 2
| 10,708
| 15,164,781
|
[["technology", "today", "n't", "product", "population"], ["think", "well", "could", "living", "n't", "deforested", "lands", "polluted", "waters", "degraded", "soils", "overtaxed", "aquifers", "rivers"], ["would", "middle", "east", "seem", "intractable", "problem", "still", "plenty", "water", "arable", "land", "available", "population", "region", "fraction", "today"], ["think", "vast", "advances", "civilization", "made", "first", "second", "millenniums", "less", "billion", "people", "living", "planet"], ["birth", "control", "practiced", "earlier", "history", "would", "less", "advanced", "civilization"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "RB", "MD", "VBG", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NNS"], ["MD", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJR", "CD", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "RBR", "NN", "MD", "RBR", "JJ", "NN"]]
|
technology today n't product population. think well could living n't deforested lands polluted waters degraded soils overtaxed aquifers rivers. would middle east seem intractable problem still plenty water arable land available population region fraction today. think vast advances civilization made first second millenniums less billion people living planet. birth control practiced earlier history would less advanced civilization
|
["conservation"]
|
conservation
| 1
| 0
|
Andy
|
The technology we have today isn't a product of our population. Think how well we could be living now if we hadn't deforested our lands, polluted our waters, degraded our soils and overtaxed our aquifers and rivers. Would the middle east seem so intractable a problem if there was still plenty of water and arable land available; if the population of the region was just a fraction of what it is today? Think of the vast advances civilization made in the first and second millenniums with less than a billion people living on this planet. If birth control had been practiced earlier in our history would we be any less advanced a civilization?
|
a legitimate threat
|
A1712-P
|
population
| 1
| 3
| 10,709
| 15,164,781
|
[["technology", "today", "n't", "product", "population"], ["think", "well", "could", "living", "n't", "deforested", "lands", "polluted", "waters", "degraded", "soils", "overtaxed", "aquifers", "rivers"], ["would", "middle", "east", "seem", "intractable", "problem", "still", "plenty", "water", "arable", "land", "available", "population", "region", "fraction", "today"], ["think", "vast", "advances", "civilization", "made", "first", "second", "millenniums", "less", "billion", "people", "living", "planet"], ["birth", "control", "practiced", "earlier", "history", "would", "less", "advanced", "civilization"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "RB", "MD", "VBG", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NNS"], ["MD", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJR", "CD", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "RBR", "NN", "MD", "RBR", "JJ", "NN"]]
|
technology today n't product population. think well could living n't deforested lands polluted waters degraded soils overtaxed aquifers rivers. would middle east seem intractable problem still plenty water arable land available population region fraction today. think vast advances civilization made first second millenniums less billion people living planet. birth control practiced earlier history would less advanced civilization
|
["population"]
|
population
| 1
| 1
|
Andy
|
The technology we have today isn't a product of our population. Think how well we could be living now if we hadn't deforested our lands, polluted our waters, degraded our soils and overtaxed our aquifers and rivers. Would the middle east seem so intractable a problem if there was still plenty of water and arable land available; if the population of the region was just a fraction of what it is today? Think of the vast advances civilization made in the first and second millenniums with less than a billion people living on this planet. If birth control had been practiced earlier in our history would we be any less advanced a civilization?
|
overcrowding
|
A1711-P
|
overcrowding
| 0
| 1
| 11,889
| 15,164,781
|
[["technology", "today", "n't", "product", "population"], ["think", "well", "could", "living", "n't", "deforested", "lands", "polluted", "waters", "degraded", "soils", "overtaxed", "aquifers", "rivers"], ["would", "middle", "east", "seem", "intractable", "problem", "still", "plenty", "water", "arable", "land", "available", "population", "region", "fraction", "today"], ["think", "vast", "advances", "civilization", "made", "first", "second", "millenniums", "less", "billion", "people", "living", "planet"], ["birth", "control", "practiced", "earlier", "history", "would", "less", "advanced", "civilization"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "RB", "MD", "VBG", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NNS"], ["MD", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJR", "CD", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "RBR", "NN", "MD", "RBR", "JJ", "NN"]]
|
technology today n't product population. think well could living n't deforested lands polluted waters degraded soils overtaxed aquifers rivers. would middle east seem intractable problem still plenty water arable land available population region fraction today. think vast advances civilization made first second millenniums less billion people living planet. birth control practiced earlier history would less advanced civilization
|
["overcrowding"]
|
overcrowding
| 1
| 0
|
Andy
|
The technology we have today isn't a product of our population. Think how well we could be living now if we hadn't deforested our lands, polluted our waters, degraded our soils and overtaxed our aquifers and rivers. Would the middle east seem so intractable a problem if there was still plenty of water and arable land available; if the population of the region was just a fraction of what it is today? Think of the vast advances civilization made in the first and second millenniums with less than a billion people living on this planet. If birth control had been practiced earlier in our history would we be any less advanced a civilization?
|
overcrowding
|
A1711-P
|
living better
| 0
| 3
| 11,890
| 15,164,781
|
[["technology", "today", "n't", "product", "population"], ["think", "well", "could", "living", "n't", "deforested", "lands", "polluted", "waters", "degraded", "soils", "overtaxed", "aquifers", "rivers"], ["would", "middle", "east", "seem", "intractable", "problem", "still", "plenty", "water", "arable", "land", "available", "population", "region", "fraction", "today"], ["think", "vast", "advances", "civilization", "made", "first", "second", "millenniums", "less", "billion", "people", "living", "planet"], ["birth", "control", "practiced", "earlier", "history", "would", "less", "advanced", "civilization"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "RB", "MD", "VBG", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NNS"], ["MD", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJR", "CD", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "RBR", "NN", "MD", "RBR", "JJ", "NN"]]
|
technology today n't product population. think well could living n't deforested lands polluted waters degraded soils overtaxed aquifers rivers. would middle east seem intractable problem still plenty water arable land available population region fraction today. think vast advances civilization made first second millenniums less billion people living planet. birth control practiced earlier history would less advanced civilization
|
["living", "better"]
|
living better
| 1
| 0
|
Andy
|
The technology we have today isn't a product of our population. Think how well we could be living now if we hadn't deforested our lands, polluted our waters, degraded our soils and overtaxed our aquifers and rivers. Would the middle east seem so intractable a problem if there was still plenty of water and arable land available; if the population of the region was just a fraction of what it is today? Think of the vast advances civilization made in the first and second millenniums with less than a billion people living on this planet. If birth control had been practiced earlier in our history would we be any less advanced a civilization?
|
overcrowding
|
A1711-P
|
technological advancement
| 0
| 3
| 11,891
| 15,164,781
|
[["technology", "today", "n't", "product", "population"], ["think", "well", "could", "living", "n't", "deforested", "lands", "polluted", "waters", "degraded", "soils", "overtaxed", "aquifers", "rivers"], ["would", "middle", "east", "seem", "intractable", "problem", "still", "plenty", "water", "arable", "land", "available", "population", "region", "fraction", "today"], ["think", "vast", "advances", "civilization", "made", "first", "second", "millenniums", "less", "billion", "people", "living", "planet"], ["birth", "control", "practiced", "earlier", "history", "would", "less", "advanced", "civilization"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "RB", "MD", "VBG", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NNS"], ["MD", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJR", "CD", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "RBR", "NN", "MD", "RBR", "JJ", "NN"]]
|
technology today n't product population. think well could living n't deforested lands polluted waters degraded soils overtaxed aquifers rivers. would middle east seem intractable problem still plenty water arable land available population region fraction today. think vast advances civilization made first second millenniums less billion people living planet. birth control practiced earlier history would less advanced civilization
|
["technological", "advancement"]
|
technological advancement
| 1
| 0
|
Andy
|
The technology we have today isn't a product of our population. Think how well we could be living now if we hadn't deforested our lands, polluted our waters, degraded our soils and overtaxed our aquifers and rivers. Would the middle east seem so intractable a problem if there was still plenty of water and arable land available; if the population of the region was just a fraction of what it is today? Think of the vast advances civilization made in the first and second millenniums with less than a billion people living on this planet. If birth control had been practiced earlier in our history would we be any less advanced a civilization?
|
overcrowding
|
A1711-P
|
conservation
| 1
| 2
| 11,892
| 15,164,781
|
[["technology", "today", "n't", "product", "population"], ["think", "well", "could", "living", "n't", "deforested", "lands", "polluted", "waters", "degraded", "soils", "overtaxed", "aquifers", "rivers"], ["would", "middle", "east", "seem", "intractable", "problem", "still", "plenty", "water", "arable", "land", "available", "population", "region", "fraction", "today"], ["think", "vast", "advances", "civilization", "made", "first", "second", "millenniums", "less", "billion", "people", "living", "planet"], ["birth", "control", "practiced", "earlier", "history", "would", "less", "advanced", "civilization"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "RB", "MD", "VBG", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NNS"], ["MD", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJR", "CD", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "RBR", "NN", "MD", "RBR", "JJ", "NN"]]
|
technology today n't product population. think well could living n't deforested lands polluted waters degraded soils overtaxed aquifers rivers. would middle east seem intractable problem still plenty water arable land available population region fraction today. think vast advances civilization made first second millenniums less billion people living planet. birth control practiced earlier history would less advanced civilization
|
["conservation"]
|
conservation
| 1
| 0
|
Andy
|
The technology we have today isn't a product of our population. Think how well we could be living now if we hadn't deforested our lands, polluted our waters, degraded our soils and overtaxed our aquifers and rivers. Would the middle east seem so intractable a problem if there was still plenty of water and arable land available; if the population of the region was just a fraction of what it is today? Think of the vast advances civilization made in the first and second millenniums with less than a billion people living on this planet. If birth control had been practiced earlier in our history would we be any less advanced a civilization?
|
overcrowding
|
A1711-P
|
middle east
| 1
| 3
| 11,893
| 15,164,781
|
[["technology", "today", "n't", "product", "population"], ["think", "well", "could", "living", "n't", "deforested", "lands", "polluted", "waters", "degraded", "soils", "overtaxed", "aquifers", "rivers"], ["would", "middle", "east", "seem", "intractable", "problem", "still", "plenty", "water", "arable", "land", "available", "population", "region", "fraction", "today"], ["think", "vast", "advances", "civilization", "made", "first", "second", "millenniums", "less", "billion", "people", "living", "planet"], ["birth", "control", "practiced", "earlier", "history", "would", "less", "advanced", "civilization"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "RB", "MD", "VBG", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NNS"], ["MD", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJR", "CD", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "RBR", "NN", "MD", "RBR", "JJ", "NN"]]
|
technology today n't product population. think well could living n't deforested lands polluted waters degraded soils overtaxed aquifers rivers. would middle east seem intractable problem still plenty water arable land available population region fraction today. think vast advances civilization made first second millenniums less billion people living planet. birth control practiced earlier history would less advanced civilization
|
["middle", "east"]
|
middle east
| 1
| 1
|
joedonney
|
I'm in advertising. A writer and an art director (in the old world) are paired together to come up with creative ideas that neither might arrive at alone. It's an awkward dance between two minds. You have to make a fool of yourself, try out all the bad ideas first, give criticism, accept it. At times it means shouting, singing, cursing, ranting, and speaking every bawdy, politically-incorrect idea that crosses your mind. The process can not be done in public, in an open work area. It's too embarrassing. It involves trust in the person you're collaborating with not to repeat every stupid thing you uttered on the hard road to a good idea. An office needs to be designed based on the kind of work people are doing. Pity to anyone who needs to work on the phone in an open plan.
|
office layout
|
A5217-P
|
office layout
| 1
| 1
| 14,313
| 13,845,874
|
[["'m", "advertising"], ["writer", "art", "director", "old", "world", "paired", "together", "come", "creative", "ideas", "neither", "might", "arrive", "alone"], ["'s", "awkward", "dance", "two", "minds"], ["make", "fool", "try", "bad", "ideas", "first", "give", "criticism", "accept"], ["times", "means", "shouting", "singing", "cursing", "ranting", "speaking", "every", "bawdy", "politically", "incorrect", "idea", "crosses", "mind"], ["process", "done", "public", "open", "work", "area"], ["'s", "embarrassing"], ["involves", "trust", "person", "'re", "collaborating", "repeat", "every", "stupid", "thing", "uttered", "hard", "road", "good", "idea"], ["office", "needs", "designed", "based", "kind", "work", "people"], ["pity", "anyone", "needs", "work", "phone", "open", "plan"]]
|
[["VBP", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "CC", "MD", "VB", "RB"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB"], ["NNS", "VBZ", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "DT", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ", "JJ"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "VB", "DT", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN"]]
|
'm advertising. writer art director old world paired together come creative ideas neither might arrive alone. 's awkward dance two minds. make fool try bad ideas first give criticism accept. times means shouting singing cursing ranting speaking every bawdy politically incorrect idea crosses mind. process done public open work area. 's embarrassing. involves trust person 're collaborating repeat every stupid thing uttered hard road good idea. office needs designed based kind work people. pity anyone needs work phone open plan
|
["office", "layout"]
|
office layout
| 1
| 0
|
joedonney
|
I'm in advertising. A writer and an art director (in the old world) are paired together to come up with creative ideas that neither might arrive at alone. It's an awkward dance between two minds. You have to make a fool of yourself, try out all the bad ideas first, give criticism, accept it. At times it means shouting, singing, cursing, ranting, and speaking every bawdy, politically-incorrect idea that crosses your mind. The process can not be done in public, in an open work area. It's too embarrassing. It involves trust in the person you're collaborating with not to repeat every stupid thing you uttered on the hard road to a good idea. An office needs to be designed based on the kind of work people are doing. Pity to anyone who needs to work on the phone in an open plan.
|
office layout
|
A5217-P
|
office design
| 1
| 3
| 14,314
| 13,845,874
|
[["'m", "advertising"], ["writer", "art", "director", "old", "world", "paired", "together", "come", "creative", "ideas", "neither", "might", "arrive", "alone"], ["'s", "awkward", "dance", "two", "minds"], ["make", "fool", "try", "bad", "ideas", "first", "give", "criticism", "accept"], ["times", "means", "shouting", "singing", "cursing", "ranting", "speaking", "every", "bawdy", "politically", "incorrect", "idea", "crosses", "mind"], ["process", "done", "public", "open", "work", "area"], ["'s", "embarrassing"], ["involves", "trust", "person", "'re", "collaborating", "repeat", "every", "stupid", "thing", "uttered", "hard", "road", "good", "idea"], ["office", "needs", "designed", "based", "kind", "work", "people"], ["pity", "anyone", "needs", "work", "phone", "open", "plan"]]
|
[["VBP", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "CC", "MD", "VB", "RB"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB"], ["NNS", "VBZ", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "DT", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ", "JJ"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "VB", "DT", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN"]]
|
'm advertising. writer art director old world paired together come creative ideas neither might arrive alone. 's awkward dance two minds. make fool try bad ideas first give criticism accept. times means shouting singing cursing ranting speaking every bawdy politically incorrect idea crosses mind. process done public open work area. 's embarrassing. involves trust person 're collaborating repeat every stupid thing uttered hard road good idea. office needs designed based kind work people. pity anyone needs work phone open plan
|
["office", "design"]
|
office design
| 1
| 0
|
joedonney
|
I'm in advertising. A writer and an art director (in the old world) are paired together to come up with creative ideas that neither might arrive at alone. It's an awkward dance between two minds. You have to make a fool of yourself, try out all the bad ideas first, give criticism, accept it. At times it means shouting, singing, cursing, ranting, and speaking every bawdy, politically-incorrect idea that crosses your mind. The process can not be done in public, in an open work area. It's too embarrassing. It involves trust in the person you're collaborating with not to repeat every stupid thing you uttered on the hard road to a good idea. An office needs to be designed based on the kind of work people are doing. Pity to anyone who needs to work on the phone in an open plan.
|
office layout
|
A5217-P
|
advertise
| 1
| 2
| 14,315
| 13,845,874
|
[["'m", "advertising"], ["writer", "art", "director", "old", "world", "paired", "together", "come", "creative", "ideas", "neither", "might", "arrive", "alone"], ["'s", "awkward", "dance", "two", "minds"], ["make", "fool", "try", "bad", "ideas", "first", "give", "criticism", "accept"], ["times", "means", "shouting", "singing", "cursing", "ranting", "speaking", "every", "bawdy", "politically", "incorrect", "idea", "crosses", "mind"], ["process", "done", "public", "open", "work", "area"], ["'s", "embarrassing"], ["involves", "trust", "person", "'re", "collaborating", "repeat", "every", "stupid", "thing", "uttered", "hard", "road", "good", "idea"], ["office", "needs", "designed", "based", "kind", "work", "people"], ["pity", "anyone", "needs", "work", "phone", "open", "plan"]]
|
[["VBP", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "CC", "MD", "VB", "RB"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB"], ["NNS", "VBZ", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "DT", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ", "JJ"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "VB", "DT", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN"]]
|
'm advertising. writer art director old world paired together come creative ideas neither might arrive alone. 's awkward dance two minds. make fool try bad ideas first give criticism accept. times means shouting singing cursing ranting speaking every bawdy politically incorrect idea crosses mind. process done public open work area. 's embarrassing. involves trust person 're collaborating repeat every stupid thing uttered hard road good idea. office needs designed based kind work people. pity anyone needs work phone open plan
|
["advertise"]
|
advertise
| 1
| 0
|
joedonney
|
I'm in advertising. A writer and an art director (in the old world) are paired together to come up with creative ideas that neither might arrive at alone. It's an awkward dance between two minds. You have to make a fool of yourself, try out all the bad ideas first, give criticism, accept it. At times it means shouting, singing, cursing, ranting, and speaking every bawdy, politically-incorrect idea that crosses your mind. The process can not be done in public, in an open work area. It's too embarrassing. It involves trust in the person you're collaborating with not to repeat every stupid thing you uttered on the hard road to a good idea. An office needs to be designed based on the kind of work people are doing. Pity to anyone who needs to work on the phone in an open plan.
|
office layout
|
A5217-P
|
criticism
| 1
| 3
| 14,316
| 13,845,874
|
[["'m", "advertising"], ["writer", "art", "director", "old", "world", "paired", "together", "come", "creative", "ideas", "neither", "might", "arrive", "alone"], ["'s", "awkward", "dance", "two", "minds"], ["make", "fool", "try", "bad", "ideas", "first", "give", "criticism", "accept"], ["times", "means", "shouting", "singing", "cursing", "ranting", "speaking", "every", "bawdy", "politically", "incorrect", "idea", "crosses", "mind"], ["process", "done", "public", "open", "work", "area"], ["'s", "embarrassing"], ["involves", "trust", "person", "'re", "collaborating", "repeat", "every", "stupid", "thing", "uttered", "hard", "road", "good", "idea"], ["office", "needs", "designed", "based", "kind", "work", "people"], ["pity", "anyone", "needs", "work", "phone", "open", "plan"]]
|
[["VBP", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "CC", "MD", "VB", "RB"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB"], ["NNS", "VBZ", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "DT", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["VBZ", "JJ"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "VB", "DT", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN"]]
|
'm advertising. writer art director old world paired together come creative ideas neither might arrive alone. 's awkward dance two minds. make fool try bad ideas first give criticism accept. times means shouting singing cursing ranting speaking every bawdy politically incorrect idea crosses mind. process done public open work area. 's embarrassing. involves trust person 're collaborating repeat every stupid thing uttered hard road good idea. office needs designed based kind work people. pity anyone needs work phone open plan
|
["criticism"]
|
criticism
| 1
| 1
|
CityBumpkin
|
It seems state public universities are starting to lose their purpose, which is to make higher education more accessible for the state's residents, especially those who are not wealthy. I understand Mr. Johnson's points about the university's financial bind, but if state universities will not serve those they are meant to serve, what's the point?
|
public universities
|
A3411-P
|
public universities
| 0
| 1
| 18,159
| 18,179,442
|
[["seems", "state", "public", "universities", "starting", "lose", "purpose", "make", "higher", "education", "accessible", "state", "'s", "residents", "especially", "wealthy"], ["understand", "mr.", "johnson", "'s", "points", "university", "'s", "financial", "bind", "state", "universities", "serve", "meant", "serve", "'s", "point"]]
|
[["VBZ", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "POS", "NNS", "RB", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "VBN", "VB", "VBZ", "NN"]]
|
seems state public universities starting lose purpose make higher education accessible state 's residents especially wealthy. understand mr. johnson 's points university 's financial bind state universities serve meant serve 's point
|
["public", "university"]
|
public university
| 1
| 0
|
CityBumpkin
|
It seems state public universities are starting to lose their purpose, which is to make higher education more accessible for the state's residents, especially those who are not wealthy. I understand Mr. Johnson's points about the university's financial bind, but if state universities will not serve those they are meant to serve, what's the point?
|
public universities
|
A3411-P
|
public universities
| 1
| 3
| 18,160
| 18,179,442
|
[["seems", "state", "public", "universities", "starting", "lose", "purpose", "make", "higher", "education", "accessible", "state", "'s", "residents", "especially", "wealthy"], ["understand", "mr.", "johnson", "'s", "points", "university", "'s", "financial", "bind", "state", "universities", "serve", "meant", "serve", "'s", "point"]]
|
[["VBZ", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "POS", "NNS", "RB", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "VBN", "VB", "VBZ", "NN"]]
|
seems state public universities starting lose purpose make higher education accessible state 's residents especially wealthy. understand mr. johnson 's points university 's financial bind state universities serve meant serve 's point
|
["public", "university"]
|
public university
| 1
| 0
|
CityBumpkin
|
It seems state public universities are starting to lose their purpose, which is to make higher education more accessible for the state's residents, especially those who are not wealthy. I understand Mr. Johnson's points about the university's financial bind, but if state universities will not serve those they are meant to serve, what's the point?
|
public universities
|
A3411-P
|
state univerities
| 0
| 3
| 18,161
| 18,179,442
|
[["seems", "state", "public", "universities", "starting", "lose", "purpose", "make", "higher", "education", "accessible", "state", "'s", "residents", "especially", "wealthy"], ["understand", "mr.", "johnson", "'s", "points", "university", "'s", "financial", "bind", "state", "universities", "serve", "meant", "serve", "'s", "point"]]
|
[["VBZ", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "POS", "NNS", "RB", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "VBN", "VB", "VBZ", "NN"]]
|
seems state public universities starting lose purpose make higher education accessible state 's residents especially wealthy. understand mr. johnson 's points university 's financial bind state universities serve meant serve 's point
|
["state", "university"]
|
state university
| 1
| 0
|
CityBumpkin
|
It seems state public universities are starting to lose their purpose, which is to make higher education more accessible for the state's residents, especially those who are not wealthy. I understand Mr. Johnson's points about the university's financial bind, but if state universities will not serve those they are meant to serve, what's the point?
|
in-state students
|
A3412-P
|
in-state students
| 1
| 1
| 18,172
| 18,179,442
|
[["seems", "state", "public", "universities", "starting", "lose", "purpose", "make", "higher", "education", "accessible", "state", "'s", "residents", "especially", "wealthy"], ["understand", "mr.", "johnson", "'s", "points", "university", "'s", "financial", "bind", "state", "universities", "serve", "meant", "serve", "'s", "point"]]
|
[["VBZ", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "POS", "NNS", "RB", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "VBN", "VB", "VBZ", "NN"]]
|
seems state public universities starting lose purpose make higher education accessible state 's residents especially wealthy. understand mr. johnson 's points university 's financial bind state universities serve meant serve 's point
|
["intestate", "student"]
|
intestate student
| 1
| 0
|
CityBumpkin
|
It seems state public universities are starting to lose their purpose, which is to make higher education more accessible for the state's residents, especially those who are not wealthy. I understand Mr. Johnson's points about the university's financial bind, but if state universities will not serve those they are meant to serve, what's the point?
|
in-state students
|
A3412-P
|
public universities
| 1
| 3
| 18,173
| 18,179,442
|
[["seems", "state", "public", "universities", "starting", "lose", "purpose", "make", "higher", "education", "accessible", "state", "'s", "residents", "especially", "wealthy"], ["understand", "mr.", "johnson", "'s", "points", "university", "'s", "financial", "bind", "state", "universities", "serve", "meant", "serve", "'s", "point"]]
|
[["VBZ", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "POS", "NNS", "RB", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "VBN", "VB", "VBZ", "NN"]]
|
seems state public universities starting lose purpose make higher education accessible state 's residents especially wealthy. understand mr. johnson 's points university 's financial bind state universities serve meant serve 's point
|
["public", "university"]
|
public university
| 1
| 0
|
CityBumpkin
|
It seems state public universities are starting to lose their purpose, which is to make higher education more accessible for the state's residents, especially those who are not wealthy. I understand Mr. Johnson's points about the university's financial bind, but if state universities will not serve those they are meant to serve, what's the point?
|
in-state students
|
A3412-P
|
public universities
| 0
| 2
| 18,174
| 18,179,442
|
[["seems", "state", "public", "universities", "starting", "lose", "purpose", "make", "higher", "education", "accessible", "state", "'s", "residents", "especially", "wealthy"], ["understand", "mr.", "johnson", "'s", "points", "university", "'s", "financial", "bind", "state", "universities", "serve", "meant", "serve", "'s", "point"]]
|
[["VBZ", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "POS", "NNS", "RB", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "VBN", "VB", "VBZ", "NN"]]
|
seems state public universities starting lose purpose make higher education accessible state 's residents especially wealthy. understand mr. johnson 's points university 's financial bind state universities serve meant serve 's point
|
["public", "university"]
|
public university
| 1
| 0
|
CityBumpkin
|
It seems state public universities are starting to lose their purpose, which is to make higher education more accessible for the state's residents, especially those who are not wealthy. I understand Mr. Johnson's points about the university's financial bind, but if state universities will not serve those they are meant to serve, what's the point?
|
in-state students
|
A3412-P
|
higher education
| 0
| 3
| 18,175
| 18,179,442
|
[["seems", "state", "public", "universities", "starting", "lose", "purpose", "make", "higher", "education", "accessible", "state", "'s", "residents", "especially", "wealthy"], ["understand", "mr.", "johnson", "'s", "points", "university", "'s", "financial", "bind", "state", "universities", "serve", "meant", "serve", "'s", "point"]]
|
[["VBZ", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "POS", "NNS", "RB", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "VBN", "VB", "VBZ", "NN"]]
|
seems state public universities starting lose purpose make higher education accessible state 's residents especially wealthy. understand mr. johnson 's points university 's financial bind state universities serve meant serve 's point
|
["higher", "education"]
|
higher education
| 1
| 1
|
CMS
|
I currently have no children in the public schools yet I am taxed for them. Should I as a taxpayer get a subsidy because I do not make use of the public schools? No. If as a society we feel that public education is important and you as a parent want to make the choice to either homeschool your children or send them to private school that is your right. However, you do not have the right to take public funds to do that. This is just a backdoor way to say that vochers are ok and to undermine funding for public schools. Public schools have to take everyone and often for special needs children at great cost. Any attempt to divert dollars away from that public good should not even be considered.
|
a tax break
|
A5184-P
|
a tax break
| 0
| 1
| 449
| 3,171,704
|
[["currently", "children", "public", "schools", "yet", "taxed"], ["taxpayer", "get", "subsidy", "make", "use", "public", "schools"], ["society", "feel", "public", "education", "important", "parent", "want", "make", "choice", "either", "homeschool", "children", "send", "private", "school", "right"], ["however", "right", "take", "public", "funds"], ["backdoor", "way", "say", "vochers", "ok", "undermine", "funding", "public", "schools"], ["public", "schools", "take", "everyone", "often", "special", "needs", "children", "great", "cost"], ["attempt", "divert", "dollars", "away", "public", "good", "even", "considered"]]
|
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "CC", "VBN"], ["NN", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "CC", "VB", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN"]]
|
currently children public schools yet taxed. taxpayer get subsidy make use public schools. society feel public education important parent want make choice either homeschool children send private school right. however right take public funds. backdoor way say vochers ok undermine funding public schools. public schools take everyone often special needs children great cost. attempt divert dollars away public good even considered
|
["tax", "break"]
|
tax break
| 1
| 0
|
CMS
|
I currently have no children in the public schools yet I am taxed for them. Should I as a taxpayer get a subsidy because I do not make use of the public schools? No. If as a society we feel that public education is important and you as a parent want to make the choice to either homeschool your children or send them to private school that is your right. However, you do not have the right to take public funds to do that. This is just a backdoor way to say that vochers are ok and to undermine funding for public schools. Public schools have to take everyone and often for special needs children at great cost. Any attempt to divert dollars away from that public good should not even be considered.
|
a tax break
|
A5184-P
|
public education
| 0
| 3
| 450
| 3,171,704
|
[["currently", "children", "public", "schools", "yet", "taxed"], ["taxpayer", "get", "subsidy", "make", "use", "public", "schools"], ["society", "feel", "public", "education", "important", "parent", "want", "make", "choice", "either", "homeschool", "children", "send", "private", "school", "right"], ["however", "right", "take", "public", "funds"], ["backdoor", "way", "say", "vochers", "ok", "undermine", "funding", "public", "schools"], ["public", "schools", "take", "everyone", "often", "special", "needs", "children", "great", "cost"], ["attempt", "divert", "dollars", "away", "public", "good", "even", "considered"]]
|
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "CC", "VBN"], ["NN", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "CC", "VB", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN"]]
|
currently children public schools yet taxed. taxpayer get subsidy make use public schools. society feel public education important parent want make choice either homeschool children send private school right. however right take public funds. backdoor way say vochers ok undermine funding public schools. public schools take everyone often special needs children great cost. attempt divert dollars away public good even considered
|
["public", "education"]
|
public education
| 1
| 1
|
CMS
|
I currently have no children in the public schools yet I am taxed for them. Should I as a taxpayer get a subsidy because I do not make use of the public schools? No. If as a society we feel that public education is important and you as a parent want to make the choice to either homeschool your children or send them to private school that is your right. However, you do not have the right to take public funds to do that. This is just a backdoor way to say that vochers are ok and to undermine funding for public schools. Public schools have to take everyone and often for special needs children at great cost. Any attempt to divert dollars away from that public good should not even be considered.
|
a tax break
|
A5184-P
|
tax breaks
| 0
| 3
| 451
| 3,171,704
|
[["currently", "children", "public", "schools", "yet", "taxed"], ["taxpayer", "get", "subsidy", "make", "use", "public", "schools"], ["society", "feel", "public", "education", "important", "parent", "want", "make", "choice", "either", "homeschool", "children", "send", "private", "school", "right"], ["however", "right", "take", "public", "funds"], ["backdoor", "way", "say", "vochers", "ok", "undermine", "funding", "public", "schools"], ["public", "schools", "take", "everyone", "often", "special", "needs", "children", "great", "cost"], ["attempt", "divert", "dollars", "away", "public", "good", "even", "considered"]]
|
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "CC", "VBN"], ["NN", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "CC", "VB", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN"]]
|
currently children public schools yet taxed. taxpayer get subsidy make use public schools. society feel public education important parent want make choice either homeschool children send private school right. however right take public funds. backdoor way say vochers ok undermine funding public schools. public schools take everyone often special needs children great cost. attempt divert dollars away public good even considered
|
["tax", "break"]
|
tax break
| 1
| 0
|
CMS
|
I currently have no children in the public schools yet I am taxed for them. Should I as a taxpayer get a subsidy because I do not make use of the public schools? No. If as a society we feel that public education is important and you as a parent want to make the choice to either homeschool your children or send them to private school that is your right. However, you do not have the right to take public funds to do that. This is just a backdoor way to say that vochers are ok and to undermine funding for public schools. Public schools have to take everyone and often for special needs children at great cost. Any attempt to divert dollars away from that public good should not even be considered.
|
a tax break
|
A5184-P
|
public school systems
| 1
| 3
| 452
| 3,171,704
|
[["currently", "children", "public", "schools", "yet", "taxed"], ["taxpayer", "get", "subsidy", "make", "use", "public", "schools"], ["society", "feel", "public", "education", "important", "parent", "want", "make", "choice", "either", "homeschool", "children", "send", "private", "school", "right"], ["however", "right", "take", "public", "funds"], ["backdoor", "way", "say", "vochers", "ok", "undermine", "funding", "public", "schools"], ["public", "schools", "take", "everyone", "often", "special", "needs", "children", "great", "cost"], ["attempt", "divert", "dollars", "away", "public", "good", "even", "considered"]]
|
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "CC", "VBN"], ["NN", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "CC", "VB", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN"]]
|
currently children public schools yet taxed. taxpayer get subsidy make use public schools. society feel public education important parent want make choice either homeschool children send private school right. however right take public funds. backdoor way say vochers ok undermine funding public schools. public schools take everyone often special needs children great cost. attempt divert dollars away public good even considered
|
["public", "school", "system"]
|
public school system
| 1
| 0
|
CMS
|
I currently have no children in the public schools yet I am taxed for them. Should I as a taxpayer get a subsidy because I do not make use of the public schools? No. If as a society we feel that public education is important and you as a parent want to make the choice to either homeschool your children or send them to private school that is your right. However, you do not have the right to take public funds to do that. This is just a backdoor way to say that vochers are ok and to undermine funding for public schools. Public schools have to take everyone and often for special needs children at great cost. Any attempt to divert dollars away from that public good should not even be considered.
|
home schoolers
|
A5183-P
|
private school vouchers
| 0
| 2
| 899
| 3,171,704
|
[["currently", "children", "public", "schools", "yet", "taxed"], ["taxpayer", "get", "subsidy", "make", "use", "public", "schools"], ["society", "feel", "public", "education", "important", "parent", "want", "make", "choice", "either", "homeschool", "children", "send", "private", "school", "right"], ["however", "right", "take", "public", "funds"], ["backdoor", "way", "say", "vochers", "ok", "undermine", "funding", "public", "schools"], ["public", "schools", "take", "everyone", "often", "special", "needs", "children", "great", "cost"], ["attempt", "divert", "dollars", "away", "public", "good", "even", "considered"]]
|
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "CC", "VBN"], ["NN", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "CC", "VB", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN"]]
|
currently children public schools yet taxed. taxpayer get subsidy make use public schools. society feel public education important parent want make choice either homeschool children send private school right. however right take public funds. backdoor way say vochers ok undermine funding public schools. public schools take everyone often special needs children great cost. attempt divert dollars away public good even considered
|
["private", "school", "voucher"]
|
private school voucher
| 1
| 0
|
CMS
|
I currently have no children in the public schools yet I am taxed for them. Should I as a taxpayer get a subsidy because I do not make use of the public schools? No. If as a society we feel that public education is important and you as a parent want to make the choice to either homeschool your children or send them to private school that is your right. However, you do not have the right to take public funds to do that. This is just a backdoor way to say that vochers are ok and to undermine funding for public schools. Public schools have to take everyone and often for special needs children at great cost. Any attempt to divert dollars away from that public good should not even be considered.
|
home schoolers
|
A5183-P
|
paying tax for unused services
| 1
| 2
| 900
| 3,171,704
|
[["currently", "children", "public", "schools", "yet", "taxed"], ["taxpayer", "get", "subsidy", "make", "use", "public", "schools"], ["society", "feel", "public", "education", "important", "parent", "want", "make", "choice", "either", "homeschool", "children", "send", "private", "school", "right"], ["however", "right", "take", "public", "funds"], ["backdoor", "way", "say", "vochers", "ok", "undermine", "funding", "public", "schools"], ["public", "schools", "take", "everyone", "often", "special", "needs", "children", "great", "cost"], ["attempt", "divert", "dollars", "away", "public", "good", "even", "considered"]]
|
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "CC", "VBN"], ["NN", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "CC", "VB", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN"]]
|
currently children public schools yet taxed. taxpayer get subsidy make use public schools. society feel public education important parent want make choice either homeschool children send private school right. however right take public funds. backdoor way say vochers ok undermine funding public schools. public schools take everyone often special needs children great cost. attempt divert dollars away public good even considered
|
["paying", "tax", "unused", "service"]
|
paying tax unused service
| 1
| 0
|
CMS
|
I currently have no children in the public schools yet I am taxed for them. Should I as a taxpayer get a subsidy because I do not make use of the public schools? No. If as a society we feel that public education is important and you as a parent want to make the choice to either homeschool your children or send them to private school that is your right. However, you do not have the right to take public funds to do that. This is just a backdoor way to say that vochers are ok and to undermine funding for public schools. Public schools have to take everyone and often for special needs children at great cost. Any attempt to divert dollars away from that public good should not even be considered.
|
home schoolers
|
A5183-P
|
public schools
| 0
| 3
| 901
| 3,171,704
|
[["currently", "children", "public", "schools", "yet", "taxed"], ["taxpayer", "get", "subsidy", "make", "use", "public", "schools"], ["society", "feel", "public", "education", "important", "parent", "want", "make", "choice", "either", "homeschool", "children", "send", "private", "school", "right"], ["however", "right", "take", "public", "funds"], ["backdoor", "way", "say", "vochers", "ok", "undermine", "funding", "public", "schools"], ["public", "schools", "take", "everyone", "often", "special", "needs", "children", "great", "cost"], ["attempt", "divert", "dollars", "away", "public", "good", "even", "considered"]]
|
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "CC", "VBN"], ["NN", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "CC", "VB", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN"]]
|
currently children public schools yet taxed. taxpayer get subsidy make use public schools. society feel public education important parent want make choice either homeschool children send private school right. however right take public funds. backdoor way say vochers ok undermine funding public schools. public schools take everyone often special needs children great cost. attempt divert dollars away public good even considered
|
["public", "school"]
|
public school
| 1
| 1
|
CMS
|
I currently have no children in the public schools yet I am taxed for them. Should I as a taxpayer get a subsidy because I do not make use of the public schools? No. If as a society we feel that public education is important and you as a parent want to make the choice to either homeschool your children or send them to private school that is your right. However, you do not have the right to take public funds to do that. This is just a backdoor way to say that vochers are ok and to undermine funding for public schools. Public schools have to take everyone and often for special needs children at great cost. Any attempt to divert dollars away from that public good should not even be considered.
|
home schoolers
|
A5183-P
|
public school funding
| 1
| 3
| 902
| 3,171,704
|
[["currently", "children", "public", "schools", "yet", "taxed"], ["taxpayer", "get", "subsidy", "make", "use", "public", "schools"], ["society", "feel", "public", "education", "important", "parent", "want", "make", "choice", "either", "homeschool", "children", "send", "private", "school", "right"], ["however", "right", "take", "public", "funds"], ["backdoor", "way", "say", "vochers", "ok", "undermine", "funding", "public", "schools"], ["public", "schools", "take", "everyone", "often", "special", "needs", "children", "great", "cost"], ["attempt", "divert", "dollars", "away", "public", "good", "even", "considered"]]
|
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "CC", "VBN"], ["NN", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "CC", "VB", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN"]]
|
currently children public schools yet taxed. taxpayer get subsidy make use public schools. society feel public education important parent want make choice either homeschool children send private school right. however right take public funds. backdoor way say vochers ok undermine funding public schools. public schools take everyone often special needs children great cost. attempt divert dollars away public good even considered
|
["public", "school", "funding"]
|
public school funding
| 1
| 0
|
BruceB
|
What's next? Childless families get the tax break? Those whose children go to private schools get a tax break? Do we get the tax break when our children finish schoo? We ALL have a vested interest in a well educated population. We all have an obligation to contribute to the public school system.
|
a tax break
|
A5182-P
|
a tax break
| 0
| 1
| 7,707
| 3,171,708
|
[["'s", "next"], ["childless", "families", "get", "tax", "break"], ["whose", "children", "go", "private", "schools", "get", "tax", "break"], ["get", "tax", "break", "children", "finish", "schoo"], ["vested", "interest", "well", "educated", "population"], ["obligation", "contribute", "public", "school", "system"]]
|
[["VBZ", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["WP$", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
|
's next. childless families get tax break. whose children go private schools get tax break. get tax break children finish schoo. vested interest well educated population. obligation contribute public school system
|
["tax", "break"]
|
tax break
| 1
| 1
|
BruceB
|
What's next? Childless families get the tax break? Those whose children go to private schools get a tax break? Do we get the tax break when our children finish schoo? We ALL have a vested interest in a well educated population. We all have an obligation to contribute to the public school system.
|
a tax break
|
A5182-P
|
tax break
| 0
| 3
| 7,708
| 3,171,708
|
[["'s", "next"], ["childless", "families", "get", "tax", "break"], ["whose", "children", "go", "private", "schools", "get", "tax", "break"], ["get", "tax", "break", "children", "finish", "schoo"], ["vested", "interest", "well", "educated", "population"], ["obligation", "contribute", "public", "school", "system"]]
|
[["VBZ", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["WP$", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
|
's next. childless families get tax break. whose children go private schools get tax break. get tax break children finish schoo. vested interest well educated population. obligation contribute public school system
|
["tax", "break"]
|
tax break
| 1
| 1
|
BruceB
|
What's next? Childless families get the tax break? Those whose children go to private schools get a tax break? Do we get the tax break when our children finish schoo? We ALL have a vested interest in a well educated population. We all have an obligation to contribute to the public school system.
|
a tax break
|
A5182-P
|
tax breaks
| 0
| 3
| 7,709
| 3,171,708
|
[["'s", "next"], ["childless", "families", "get", "tax", "break"], ["whose", "children", "go", "private", "schools", "get", "tax", "break"], ["get", "tax", "break", "children", "finish", "schoo"], ["vested", "interest", "well", "educated", "population"], ["obligation", "contribute", "public", "school", "system"]]
|
[["VBZ", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["WP$", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
|
's next. childless families get tax break. whose children go private schools get tax break. get tax break children finish schoo. vested interest well educated population. obligation contribute public school system
|
["tax", "break"]
|
tax break
| 1
| 1
|
BruceB
|
What's next? Childless families get the tax break? Those whose children go to private schools get a tax break? Do we get the tax break when our children finish schoo? We ALL have a vested interest in a well educated population. We all have an obligation to contribute to the public school system.
|
a tax break
|
A5182-P
|
child tax breaks
| 0
| 3
| 7,710
| 3,171,708
|
[["'s", "next"], ["childless", "families", "get", "tax", "break"], ["whose", "children", "go", "private", "schools", "get", "tax", "break"], ["get", "tax", "break", "children", "finish", "schoo"], ["vested", "interest", "well", "educated", "population"], ["obligation", "contribute", "public", "school", "system"]]
|
[["VBZ", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["WP$", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
|
's next. childless families get tax break. whose children go private schools get tax break. get tax break children finish schoo. vested interest well educated population. obligation contribute public school system
|
["child", "tax", "break"]
|
child tax break
| 1
| 0
|
BruceB
|
What's next? Childless families get the tax break? Those whose children go to private schools get a tax break? Do we get the tax break when our children finish schoo? We ALL have a vested interest in a well educated population. We all have an obligation to contribute to the public school system.
|
home schoolers
|
A5181-P
|
home schoolers
| 0
| 1
| 8,233
| 3,171,708
|
[["'s", "next"], ["childless", "families", "get", "tax", "break"], ["whose", "children", "go", "private", "schools", "get", "tax", "break"], ["get", "tax", "break", "children", "finish", "schoo"], ["vested", "interest", "well", "educated", "population"], ["obligation", "contribute", "public", "school", "system"]]
|
[["VBZ", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["WP$", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
|
's next. childless families get tax break. whose children go private schools get tax break. get tax break children finish schoo. vested interest well educated population. obligation contribute public school system
|
["home", "schoolers"]
|
home schoolers
| 1
| 0
|
BruceB
|
What's next? Childless families get the tax break? Those whose children go to private schools get a tax break? Do we get the tax break when our children finish schoo? We ALL have a vested interest in a well educated population. We all have an obligation to contribute to the public school system.
|
home schoolers
|
A5181-P
|
public school system
| 0
| 3
| 8,234
| 3,171,708
|
[["'s", "next"], ["childless", "families", "get", "tax", "break"], ["whose", "children", "go", "private", "schools", "get", "tax", "break"], ["get", "tax", "break", "children", "finish", "schoo"], ["vested", "interest", "well", "educated", "population"], ["obligation", "contribute", "public", "school", "system"]]
|
[["VBZ", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["WP$", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
|
's next. childless families get tax break. whose children go private schools get tax break. get tax break children finish schoo. vested interest well educated population. obligation contribute public school system
|
["public", "school", "system"]
|
public school system
| 1
| 1
|
BruceB
|
What's next? Childless families get the tax break? Those whose children go to private schools get a tax break? Do we get the tax break when our children finish schoo? We ALL have a vested interest in a well educated population. We all have an obligation to contribute to the public school system.
|
home schoolers
|
A5181-P
|
tax breaks for home school
| 0
| 3
| 8,235
| 3,171,708
|
[["'s", "next"], ["childless", "families", "get", "tax", "break"], ["whose", "children", "go", "private", "schools", "get", "tax", "break"], ["get", "tax", "break", "children", "finish", "schoo"], ["vested", "interest", "well", "educated", "population"], ["obligation", "contribute", "public", "school", "system"]]
|
[["VBZ", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["WP$", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
|
's next. childless families get tax break. whose children go private schools get tax break. get tax break children finish schoo. vested interest well educated population. obligation contribute public school system
|
["tax", "break", "home", "school"]
|
tax break home school
| 1
| 0
|
BruceB
|
What's next? Childless families get the tax break? Those whose children go to private schools get a tax break? Do we get the tax break when our children finish schoo? We ALL have a vested interest in a well educated population. We all have an obligation to contribute to the public school system.
|
home schoolers
|
A5181-P
|
everyone paying education tax
| 1
| 2
| 8,236
| 3,171,708
|
[["'s", "next"], ["childless", "families", "get", "tax", "break"], ["whose", "children", "go", "private", "schools", "get", "tax", "break"], ["get", "tax", "break", "children", "finish", "schoo"], ["vested", "interest", "well", "educated", "population"], ["obligation", "contribute", "public", "school", "system"]]
|
[["VBZ", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["WP$", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
|
's next. childless families get tax break. whose children go private schools get tax break. get tax break children finish schoo. vested interest well educated population. obligation contribute public school system
|
["everyone", "paying", "education", "tax"]
|
everyone paying education tax
| 1
| 0
|
BruceB
|
What's next? Childless families get the tax break? Those whose children go to private schools get a tax break? Do we get the tax break when our children finish schoo? We ALL have a vested interest in a well educated population. We all have an obligation to contribute to the public school system.
|
home schoolers
|
A5181-P
|
education tax
| 1
| 3
| 8,237
| 3,171,708
|
[["'s", "next"], ["childless", "families", "get", "tax", "break"], ["whose", "children", "go", "private", "schools", "get", "tax", "break"], ["get", "tax", "break", "children", "finish", "schoo"], ["vested", "interest", "well", "educated", "population"], ["obligation", "contribute", "public", "school", "system"]]
|
[["VBZ", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["WP$", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN"], ["VBN", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
|
's next. childless families get tax break. whose children go private schools get tax break. get tax break children finish schoo. vested interest well educated population. obligation contribute public school system
|
["education", "tax"]
|
education tax
| 1
| 0
|
b fagan
|
The rate's been dropped and we've been promised that that's all that was needed to "unleash" the "job creators". Then we got further statements from the current-day Republicans that "job creators are on strike". Well, they've not been using their tax savings to hire the rest of us. Reagan fired strikers, yet this time we're expected to reward them even more? Tax cuts and deals for those who can afford to get most of their income from investing seems to prove one thing - they don't circulate as much of their income as the rest of us do. From the way things are running this far in to Bush's "temporary" tax cuts all I can picture is a series of mansions with mattresses high in the air over all that frozen cash. Face it, Mr. Miron. There's no tax bar so low that some of the wealthy wouldn't pay bright people to find somewhere else with a lower rate. I'm picturing a land of negative taxation, and there they'd probably say they needed to be paid more by the populace.
|
capital gains
|
A2270-P
|
capital gains
| 0
| 1
| 15,093
| 6,890,877
|
[["rate", "'s", "dropped", "'ve", "promised", "'s", "needed", "unleash", "job", "creators"], ["got", "statements", "current", "day", "republicans", "job", "creators", "strike"], ["well", "'ve", "using", "tax", "savings", "hire", "rest", "us"], ["reagan", "fired", "strikers", "yet", "time", "'re", "expected", "reward", "even"], ["tax", "cuts", "deals", "afford", "get", "income", "investing", "seems", "prove", "one", "thing", "n't", "circulate", "much", "income", "rest", "us"], ["way", "things", "running", "far", "bush", "'s", "temporary", "tax", "cuts", "picture", "series", "mansions", "mattresses", "high", "air", "frozen", "cash"], ["face", "mr.", "miron"], ["'s", "tax", "bar", "low", "wealthy", "would", "n't", "pay", "bright", "people", "find", "somewhere", "else", "lower", "rate"], ["'m", "picturing", "land", "negative", "taxation", "'d", "probably", "say", "needed", "paid", "populace"]]
|
[["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VB", "VBN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBD", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["UH", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "PRP"], ["NNP", "VBD", "NNS", "CC", "NN", "VBP", "VBN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "NNS", "NNS", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "CD", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "PRP"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBG", "RB", "NNP", "POS", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "RB", "JJR", "NN"], ["VBP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "VBD", "VBN", "NN"]]
|
rate 's dropped 've promised 's needed unleash job creators. got statements current day republicans job creators strike. well 've using tax savings hire rest us. reagan fired strikers yet time 're expected reward even. tax cuts deals afford get income investing seems prove one thing n't circulate much income rest us. way things running far bush 's temporary tax cuts picture series mansions mattresses high air frozen cash. face mr. miron. 's tax bar low wealthy would n't pay bright people find somewhere else lower rate. 'm picturing land negative taxation 'd probably say needed paid populace
|
["capital", "gain"]
|
capital gain
| 1
| 0
|
b fagan
|
The rate's been dropped and we've been promised that that's all that was needed to "unleash" the "job creators". Then we got further statements from the current-day Republicans that "job creators are on strike". Well, they've not been using their tax savings to hire the rest of us. Reagan fired strikers, yet this time we're expected to reward them even more? Tax cuts and deals for those who can afford to get most of their income from investing seems to prove one thing - they don't circulate as much of their income as the rest of us do. From the way things are running this far in to Bush's "temporary" tax cuts all I can picture is a series of mansions with mattresses high in the air over all that frozen cash. Face it, Mr. Miron. There's no tax bar so low that some of the wealthy wouldn't pay bright people to find somewhere else with a lower rate. I'm picturing a land of negative taxation, and there they'd probably say they needed to be paid more by the populace.
|
capital gains
|
A2270-P
|
dropping interest rates
| 1
| 3
| 15,094
| 6,890,877
|
[["rate", "'s", "dropped", "'ve", "promised", "'s", "needed", "unleash", "job", "creators"], ["got", "statements", "current", "day", "republicans", "job", "creators", "strike"], ["well", "'ve", "using", "tax", "savings", "hire", "rest", "us"], ["reagan", "fired", "strikers", "yet", "time", "'re", "expected", "reward", "even"], ["tax", "cuts", "deals", "afford", "get", "income", "investing", "seems", "prove", "one", "thing", "n't", "circulate", "much", "income", "rest", "us"], ["way", "things", "running", "far", "bush", "'s", "temporary", "tax", "cuts", "picture", "series", "mansions", "mattresses", "high", "air", "frozen", "cash"], ["face", "mr.", "miron"], ["'s", "tax", "bar", "low", "wealthy", "would", "n't", "pay", "bright", "people", "find", "somewhere", "else", "lower", "rate"], ["'m", "picturing", "land", "negative", "taxation", "'d", "probably", "say", "needed", "paid", "populace"]]
|
[["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VB", "VBN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBD", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["UH", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "PRP"], ["NNP", "VBD", "NNS", "CC", "NN", "VBP", "VBN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "NNS", "NNS", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "CD", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "PRP"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBG", "RB", "NNP", "POS", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "RB", "JJR", "NN"], ["VBP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "VBD", "VBN", "NN"]]
|
rate 's dropped 've promised 's needed unleash job creators. got statements current day republicans job creators strike. well 've using tax savings hire rest us. reagan fired strikers yet time 're expected reward even. tax cuts deals afford get income investing seems prove one thing n't circulate much income rest us. way things running far bush 's temporary tax cuts picture series mansions mattresses high air frozen cash. face mr. miron. 's tax bar low wealthy would n't pay bright people find somewhere else lower rate. 'm picturing land negative taxation 'd probably say needed paid populace
|
["dropping", "interest", "rate"]
|
dropping interest rate
| 1
| 0
|
b fagan
|
The rate's been dropped and we've been promised that that's all that was needed to "unleash" the "job creators". Then we got further statements from the current-day Republicans that "job creators are on strike". Well, they've not been using their tax savings to hire the rest of us. Reagan fired strikers, yet this time we're expected to reward them even more? Tax cuts and deals for those who can afford to get most of their income from investing seems to prove one thing - they don't circulate as much of their income as the rest of us do. From the way things are running this far in to Bush's "temporary" tax cuts all I can picture is a series of mansions with mattresses high in the air over all that frozen cash. Face it, Mr. Miron. There's no tax bar so low that some of the wealthy wouldn't pay bright people to find somewhere else with a lower rate. I'm picturing a land of negative taxation, and there they'd probably say they needed to be paid more by the populace.
|
capital gains
|
A2270-P
|
job
| 0
| 3
| 15,095
| 6,890,877
|
[["rate", "'s", "dropped", "'ve", "promised", "'s", "needed", "unleash", "job", "creators"], ["got", "statements", "current", "day", "republicans", "job", "creators", "strike"], ["well", "'ve", "using", "tax", "savings", "hire", "rest", "us"], ["reagan", "fired", "strikers", "yet", "time", "'re", "expected", "reward", "even"], ["tax", "cuts", "deals", "afford", "get", "income", "investing", "seems", "prove", "one", "thing", "n't", "circulate", "much", "income", "rest", "us"], ["way", "things", "running", "far", "bush", "'s", "temporary", "tax", "cuts", "picture", "series", "mansions", "mattresses", "high", "air", "frozen", "cash"], ["face", "mr.", "miron"], ["'s", "tax", "bar", "low", "wealthy", "would", "n't", "pay", "bright", "people", "find", "somewhere", "else", "lower", "rate"], ["'m", "picturing", "land", "negative", "taxation", "'d", "probably", "say", "needed", "paid", "populace"]]
|
[["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VB", "VBN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBD", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["UH", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "PRP"], ["NNP", "VBD", "NNS", "CC", "NN", "VBP", "VBN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "NNS", "NNS", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "CD", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "PRP"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBG", "RB", "NNP", "POS", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "RB", "JJR", "NN"], ["VBP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "VBD", "VBN", "NN"]]
|
rate 's dropped 've promised 's needed unleash job creators. got statements current day republicans job creators strike. well 've using tax savings hire rest us. reagan fired strikers yet time 're expected reward even. tax cuts deals afford get income investing seems prove one thing n't circulate much income rest us. way things running far bush 's temporary tax cuts picture series mansions mattresses high air frozen cash. face mr. miron. 's tax bar low wealthy would n't pay bright people find somewhere else lower rate. 'm picturing land negative taxation 'd probably say needed paid populace
|
["job"]
|
job
| 1
| 1
|
b fagan
|
The rate's been dropped and we've been promised that that's all that was needed to "unleash" the "job creators". Then we got further statements from the current-day Republicans that "job creators are on strike". Well, they've not been using their tax savings to hire the rest of us. Reagan fired strikers, yet this time we're expected to reward them even more? Tax cuts and deals for those who can afford to get most of their income from investing seems to prove one thing - they don't circulate as much of their income as the rest of us do. From the way things are running this far in to Bush's "temporary" tax cuts all I can picture is a series of mansions with mattresses high in the air over all that frozen cash. Face it, Mr. Miron. There's no tax bar so low that some of the wealthy wouldn't pay bright people to find somewhere else with a lower rate. I'm picturing a land of negative taxation, and there they'd probably say they needed to be paid more by the populace.
|
capital gains
|
A2270-P
|
none
| 2
| 2
| 15,096
| 6,890,877
|
[["rate", "'s", "dropped", "'ve", "promised", "'s", "needed", "unleash", "job", "creators"], ["got", "statements", "current", "day", "republicans", "job", "creators", "strike"], ["well", "'ve", "using", "tax", "savings", "hire", "rest", "us"], ["reagan", "fired", "strikers", "yet", "time", "'re", "expected", "reward", "even"], ["tax", "cuts", "deals", "afford", "get", "income", "investing", "seems", "prove", "one", "thing", "n't", "circulate", "much", "income", "rest", "us"], ["way", "things", "running", "far", "bush", "'s", "temporary", "tax", "cuts", "picture", "series", "mansions", "mattresses", "high", "air", "frozen", "cash"], ["face", "mr.", "miron"], ["'s", "tax", "bar", "low", "wealthy", "would", "n't", "pay", "bright", "people", "find", "somewhere", "else", "lower", "rate"], ["'m", "picturing", "land", "negative", "taxation", "'d", "probably", "say", "needed", "paid", "populace"]]
|
[["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VB", "VBN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBD", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["UH", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "PRP"], ["NNP", "VBD", "NNS", "CC", "NN", "VBP", "VBN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "NNS", "NNS", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "CD", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "PRP"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBG", "RB", "NNP", "POS", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "RB", "JJR", "NN"], ["VBP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "VBD", "VBN", "NN"]]
|
rate 's dropped 've promised 's needed unleash job creators. got statements current day republicans job creators strike. well 've using tax savings hire rest us. reagan fired strikers yet time 're expected reward even. tax cuts deals afford get income investing seems prove one thing n't circulate much income rest us. way things running far bush 's temporary tax cuts picture series mansions mattresses high air frozen cash. face mr. miron. 's tax bar low wealthy would n't pay bright people find somewhere else lower rate. 'm picturing land negative taxation 'd probably say needed paid populace
|
["none"]
|
none
| 1
| 0
|
b fagan
|
The rate's been dropped and we've been promised that that's all that was needed to "unleash" the "job creators". Then we got further statements from the current-day Republicans that "job creators are on strike". Well, they've not been using their tax savings to hire the rest of us. Reagan fired strikers, yet this time we're expected to reward them even more? Tax cuts and deals for those who can afford to get most of their income from investing seems to prove one thing - they don't circulate as much of their income as the rest of us do. From the way things are running this far in to Bush's "temporary" tax cuts all I can picture is a series of mansions with mattresses high in the air over all that frozen cash. Face it, Mr. Miron. There's no tax bar so low that some of the wealthy wouldn't pay bright people to find somewhere else with a lower rate. I'm picturing a land of negative taxation, and there they'd probably say they needed to be paid more by the populace.
|
capital gains
|
A2270-P
|
tax cuts
| 2
| 3
| 15,097
| 6,890,877
|
[["rate", "'s", "dropped", "'ve", "promised", "'s", "needed", "unleash", "job", "creators"], ["got", "statements", "current", "day", "republicans", "job", "creators", "strike"], ["well", "'ve", "using", "tax", "savings", "hire", "rest", "us"], ["reagan", "fired", "strikers", "yet", "time", "'re", "expected", "reward", "even"], ["tax", "cuts", "deals", "afford", "get", "income", "investing", "seems", "prove", "one", "thing", "n't", "circulate", "much", "income", "rest", "us"], ["way", "things", "running", "far", "bush", "'s", "temporary", "tax", "cuts", "picture", "series", "mansions", "mattresses", "high", "air", "frozen", "cash"], ["face", "mr.", "miron"], ["'s", "tax", "bar", "low", "wealthy", "would", "n't", "pay", "bright", "people", "find", "somewhere", "else", "lower", "rate"], ["'m", "picturing", "land", "negative", "taxation", "'d", "probably", "say", "needed", "paid", "populace"]]
|
[["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VB", "VBN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBD", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["UH", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "PRP"], ["NNP", "VBD", "NNS", "CC", "NN", "VBP", "VBN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "NNS", "NNS", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "CD", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "PRP"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBG", "RB", "NNP", "POS", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "RB", "JJR", "NN"], ["VBP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "VBD", "VBN", "NN"]]
|
rate 's dropped 've promised 's needed unleash job creators. got statements current day republicans job creators strike. well 've using tax savings hire rest us. reagan fired strikers yet time 're expected reward even. tax cuts deals afford get income investing seems prove one thing n't circulate much income rest us. way things running far bush 's temporary tax cuts picture series mansions mattresses high air frozen cash. face mr. miron. 's tax bar low wealthy would n't pay bright people find somewhere else lower rate. 'm picturing land negative taxation 'd probably say needed paid populace
|
["tax", "cut"]
|
tax cut
| 1
| 1
|
Tracy
|
Make it illegal. I raised 3 beautiful strays, none of which were declawed. My cats are all well cared for, loved, and yea, from time to time I wake up to the sound of claws on my couch. I will say I spoil my cats, not horribly, but they have toys, scratch post, etc. No pet (fur baby) is perfect. So because they claw your couch you rip their fingers out? Sooooo, please don't procreate I don't want to know what you would do to a human child for say wetting the bed, or throwing a temper.....pets have feelings, brains, hearts, etc. Treat them with some respect and understanding. Ask yourself "what can I do differently to help my cats bad behavior." I'll also add my cats are loving and have NEVER bitten anyone! They also don't scratch or claw me, in fact 2 out of 3 are especially aware of people are are careful to retract claws when playing/running/jumping near humans. Time and patience. Stop being lazy and cruel.
|
your cat
|
A840-P
|
your cat
| 1
| 1
| 9,824
| 17,057,150
|
[["make", "illegal"], ["raised", "3", "beautiful", "strays", "none", "declawed"], ["cats", "well", "cared", "loved", "yea", "time", "time", "wake", "sound", "claws", "couch"], ["say", "spoil", "cats", "horribly", "toys", "scratch", "post", "etc"], ["pet", "fur", "baby", "perfect"], ["claw", "couch", "rip", "fingers"], ["sooooo", "please", "n't", "procreate", "n't", "want", "know", "would", "human", "child", "say", "wetting", "bed", "throwing", "temper", ".....", "pets", "feelings", "brains", "hearts", "etc"], ["treat", "respect", "understanding"], ["ask", "differently", "help", "cats", "bad", "behavior"], ["'ll", "also", "add", "cats", "loving", "never", "bitten", "anyone"], ["also", "n't", "scratch", "claw", "fact", "2", "3", "especially", "aware", "people", "careful", "retract", "claws", "playing", "running", "jumping", "near", "humans"], ["time", "patience"], ["stop", "lazy", "cruel"]]
|
[["VB", "JJ"], ["VBD", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBN"], ["NNS", "RB", "VBN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "RB", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "FW"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NN", "VBP", "NNS"], ["JJ", "UH", "RB", "VB", "RB", "VB", "VB", "MD", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NFP", "NNS", "NNS", "NNS", "NNS", "FW"], ["VB", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["MD", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "VBG", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "RB", "VB", "VB", "NN", "CD", "CD", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "IN", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN"], ["VB", "JJ", "JJ"]]
|
make illegal. raised 3 beautiful strays none declawed. cats well cared loved yea time time wake sound claws couch. say spoil cats horribly toys scratch post etc. pet fur baby perfect. claw couch rip fingers. sooooo please n't procreate n't want know would human child say wetting bed throwing temper ..... pets feelings brains hearts etc. treat respect understanding. ask differently help cats bad behavior. 'll also add cats loving never bitten anyone. also n't scratch claw fact 2 3 especially aware people careful retract claws playing running jumping near humans. time patience. stop lazy cruel
|
["cat"]
|
cat
| 1
| 1
|
Tracy
|
Make it illegal. I raised 3 beautiful strays, none of which were declawed. My cats are all well cared for, loved, and yea, from time to time I wake up to the sound of claws on my couch. I will say I spoil my cats, not horribly, but they have toys, scratch post, etc. No pet (fur baby) is perfect. So because they claw your couch you rip their fingers out? Sooooo, please don't procreate I don't want to know what you would do to a human child for say wetting the bed, or throwing a temper.....pets have feelings, brains, hearts, etc. Treat them with some respect and understanding. Ask yourself "what can I do differently to help my cats bad behavior." I'll also add my cats are loving and have NEVER bitten anyone! They also don't scratch or claw me, in fact 2 out of 3 are especially aware of people are are careful to retract claws when playing/running/jumping near humans. Time and patience. Stop being lazy and cruel.
|
your cat
|
A840-P
|
declawing cats
| 1
| 3
| 9,825
| 17,057,150
|
[["make", "illegal"], ["raised", "3", "beautiful", "strays", "none", "declawed"], ["cats", "well", "cared", "loved", "yea", "time", "time", "wake", "sound", "claws", "couch"], ["say", "spoil", "cats", "horribly", "toys", "scratch", "post", "etc"], ["pet", "fur", "baby", "perfect"], ["claw", "couch", "rip", "fingers"], ["sooooo", "please", "n't", "procreate", "n't", "want", "know", "would", "human", "child", "say", "wetting", "bed", "throwing", "temper", ".....", "pets", "feelings", "brains", "hearts", "etc"], ["treat", "respect", "understanding"], ["ask", "differently", "help", "cats", "bad", "behavior"], ["'ll", "also", "add", "cats", "loving", "never", "bitten", "anyone"], ["also", "n't", "scratch", "claw", "fact", "2", "3", "especially", "aware", "people", "careful", "retract", "claws", "playing", "running", "jumping", "near", "humans"], ["time", "patience"], ["stop", "lazy", "cruel"]]
|
[["VB", "JJ"], ["VBD", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBN"], ["NNS", "RB", "VBN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "RB", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "FW"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NN", "VBP", "NNS"], ["JJ", "UH", "RB", "VB", "RB", "VB", "VB", "MD", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NFP", "NNS", "NNS", "NNS", "NNS", "FW"], ["VB", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["MD", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "VBG", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "RB", "VB", "VB", "NN", "CD", "CD", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "IN", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN"], ["VB", "JJ", "JJ"]]
|
make illegal. raised 3 beautiful strays none declawed. cats well cared loved yea time time wake sound claws couch. say spoil cats horribly toys scratch post etc. pet fur baby perfect. claw couch rip fingers. sooooo please n't procreate n't want know would human child say wetting bed throwing temper ..... pets feelings brains hearts etc. treat respect understanding. ask differently help cats bad behavior. 'll also add cats loving never bitten anyone. also n't scratch claw fact 2 3 especially aware people careful retract claws playing running jumping near humans. time patience. stop lazy cruel
|
["declawing", "cat"]
|
declawing cat
| 1
| 0
|
Jones
|
The same sex boarding school I attended in high school was a haven for racist misogynist adults to groom like minded adolescents. I have come to realize the absence of women in leadership or in the ranks had the effect of a compassion vacuum because everybody was supposed to be male mentality tough.
|
same-sex colleges
|
A277-P
|
same-sex colleges
| 0
| 1
| 17,576
| 14,370,176
|
[["sex", "boarding", "school", "attended", "high", "school", "racist", "misogynist", "adults", "groom", "like", "minded", "adolescents"], ["come", "realize", "absence", "women", "leadership", "ranks", "effect", "compassion", "vacuum", "everybody", "supposed", "male", "mentality", "tough"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "IN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ"]]
|
sex boarding school attended high school racist misogynist adults groom like minded adolescents. come realize absence women leadership ranks effect compassion vacuum everybody supposed male mentality tough
|
["same", "sex", "college"]
|
same sex college
| 1
| 0
|
Jones
|
The same sex boarding school I attended in high school was a haven for racist misogynist adults to groom like minded adolescents. I have come to realize the absence of women in leadership or in the ranks had the effect of a compassion vacuum because everybody was supposed to be male mentality tough.
|
same-sex colleges
|
A277-P
|
racism
| 0
| 3
| 17,577
| 14,370,176
|
[["sex", "boarding", "school", "attended", "high", "school", "racist", "misogynist", "adults", "groom", "like", "minded", "adolescents"], ["come", "realize", "absence", "women", "leadership", "ranks", "effect", "compassion", "vacuum", "everybody", "supposed", "male", "mentality", "tough"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "IN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ"]]
|
sex boarding school attended high school racist misogynist adults groom like minded adolescents. come realize absence women leadership ranks effect compassion vacuum everybody supposed male mentality tough
|
["racism"]
|
racism
| 1
| 0
|
Jones
|
The same sex boarding school I attended in high school was a haven for racist misogynist adults to groom like minded adolescents. I have come to realize the absence of women in leadership or in the ranks had the effect of a compassion vacuum because everybody was supposed to be male mentality tough.
|
same-sex colleges
|
A277-P
|
same sex schools
| 0
| 3
| 17,578
| 14,370,176
|
[["sex", "boarding", "school", "attended", "high", "school", "racist", "misogynist", "adults", "groom", "like", "minded", "adolescents"], ["come", "realize", "absence", "women", "leadership", "ranks", "effect", "compassion", "vacuum", "everybody", "supposed", "male", "mentality", "tough"]]
|
[["NN", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "IN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ"]]
|
sex boarding school attended high school racist misogynist adults groom like minded adolescents. come realize absence women leadership ranks effect compassion vacuum everybody supposed male mentality tough
|
["sex", "school"]
|
sex school
| 1
| 0
|
MoCrash
|
That's hooey. If parents who home school their children are entitled to a tax credit, then what about childless taxpayers who have to pay for public schools? Why shouldn't they receive a refund of the part of property taxes which goes toward local public schools, since they have neither contributed to the costs of operating those schools or derived benefits from them? Both private and home schooling are voluntary, and hence it is a choice that parents make to eschew the public school paid for by their taxes. Taxpayers shouldn't have to pay the additional amount for their decisions. If so, then childless taxpayers are entitled to similar benefits.
|
a tax break
|
A5180-P
|
a tax break
| 0
| 1
| 9,753
| 3,171,714
|
[["'s", "hooey"], ["parents", "home", "school", "children", "entitled", "tax", "credit", "childless", "taxpayers", "pay", "public", "schools"], ["n't", "receive", "refund", "part", "property", "taxes", "goes", "toward", "local", "public", "schools", "since", "neither", "contributed", "costs", "operating", "schools", "derived", "benefits"], ["private", "home", "schooling", "voluntary", "hence", "choice", "parents", "make", "eschew", "public", "school", "paid", "taxes"], ["taxpayers", "n't", "pay", "additional", "amount", "decisions"], ["childless", "taxpayers", "entitled", "similar", "benefits"]]
|
[["VBZ", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBZ", "IN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "IN", "CC", "VBN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "VBN", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS"]]
|
's hooey. parents home school children entitled tax credit childless taxpayers pay public schools. n't receive refund part property taxes goes toward local public schools since neither contributed costs operating schools derived benefits. private home schooling voluntary hence choice parents make eschew public school paid taxes. taxpayers n't pay additional amount decisions. childless taxpayers entitled similar benefits
|
["tax", "break"]
|
tax break
| 1
| 0
|
MoCrash
|
That's hooey. If parents who home school their children are entitled to a tax credit, then what about childless taxpayers who have to pay for public schools? Why shouldn't they receive a refund of the part of property taxes which goes toward local public schools, since they have neither contributed to the costs of operating those schools or derived benefits from them? Both private and home schooling are voluntary, and hence it is a choice that parents make to eschew the public school paid for by their taxes. Taxpayers shouldn't have to pay the additional amount for their decisions. If so, then childless taxpayers are entitled to similar benefits.
|
a tax break
|
A5180-P
|
tax credits for homeschooling
| 0
| 3
| 9,754
| 3,171,714
|
[["'s", "hooey"], ["parents", "home", "school", "children", "entitled", "tax", "credit", "childless", "taxpayers", "pay", "public", "schools"], ["n't", "receive", "refund", "part", "property", "taxes", "goes", "toward", "local", "public", "schools", "since", "neither", "contributed", "costs", "operating", "schools", "derived", "benefits"], ["private", "home", "schooling", "voluntary", "hence", "choice", "parents", "make", "eschew", "public", "school", "paid", "taxes"], ["taxpayers", "n't", "pay", "additional", "amount", "decisions"], ["childless", "taxpayers", "entitled", "similar", "benefits"]]
|
[["VBZ", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBZ", "IN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "IN", "CC", "VBN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "VBN", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS"]]
|
's hooey. parents home school children entitled tax credit childless taxpayers pay public schools. n't receive refund part property taxes goes toward local public schools since neither contributed costs operating schools derived benefits. private home schooling voluntary hence choice parents make eschew public school paid taxes. taxpayers n't pay additional amount decisions. childless taxpayers entitled similar benefits
|
["tax", "credit", "homeschooling"]
|
tax credit homeschooling
| 1
| 0
|
MoCrash
|
That's hooey. If parents who home school their children are entitled to a tax credit, then what about childless taxpayers who have to pay for public schools? Why shouldn't they receive a refund of the part of property taxes which goes toward local public schools, since they have neither contributed to the costs of operating those schools or derived benefits from them? Both private and home schooling are voluntary, and hence it is a choice that parents make to eschew the public school paid for by their taxes. Taxpayers shouldn't have to pay the additional amount for their decisions. If so, then childless taxpayers are entitled to similar benefits.
|
a tax break
|
A5180-P
|
childless taxpayers
| 0
| 3
| 9,755
| 3,171,714
|
[["'s", "hooey"], ["parents", "home", "school", "children", "entitled", "tax", "credit", "childless", "taxpayers", "pay", "public", "schools"], ["n't", "receive", "refund", "part", "property", "taxes", "goes", "toward", "local", "public", "schools", "since", "neither", "contributed", "costs", "operating", "schools", "derived", "benefits"], ["private", "home", "schooling", "voluntary", "hence", "choice", "parents", "make", "eschew", "public", "school", "paid", "taxes"], ["taxpayers", "n't", "pay", "additional", "amount", "decisions"], ["childless", "taxpayers", "entitled", "similar", "benefits"]]
|
[["VBZ", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBZ", "IN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "IN", "CC", "VBN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "VBN", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS"]]
|
's hooey. parents home school children entitled tax credit childless taxpayers pay public schools. n't receive refund part property taxes goes toward local public schools since neither contributed costs operating schools derived benefits. private home schooling voluntary hence choice parents make eschew public school paid taxes. taxpayers n't pay additional amount decisions. childless taxpayers entitled similar benefits
|
["childless", "taxpayer"]
|
childless taxpayer
| 1
| 1
|
MoCrash
|
That's hooey. If parents who home school their children are entitled to a tax credit, then what about childless taxpayers who have to pay for public schools? Why shouldn't they receive a refund of the part of property taxes which goes toward local public schools, since they have neither contributed to the costs of operating those schools or derived benefits from them? Both private and home schooling are voluntary, and hence it is a choice that parents make to eschew the public school paid for by their taxes. Taxpayers shouldn't have to pay the additional amount for their decisions. If so, then childless taxpayers are entitled to similar benefits.
|
home schoolers
|
A5179-P
|
home schoolers
| 1
| 1
| 17,298
| 3,171,714
|
[["'s", "hooey"], ["parents", "home", "school", "children", "entitled", "tax", "credit", "childless", "taxpayers", "pay", "public", "schools"], ["n't", "receive", "refund", "part", "property", "taxes", "goes", "toward", "local", "public", "schools", "since", "neither", "contributed", "costs", "operating", "schools", "derived", "benefits"], ["private", "home", "schooling", "voluntary", "hence", "choice", "parents", "make", "eschew", "public", "school", "paid", "taxes"], ["taxpayers", "n't", "pay", "additional", "amount", "decisions"], ["childless", "taxpayers", "entitled", "similar", "benefits"]]
|
[["VBZ", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBZ", "IN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "IN", "CC", "VBN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "VBN", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS"]]
|
's hooey. parents home school children entitled tax credit childless taxpayers pay public schools. n't receive refund part property taxes goes toward local public schools since neither contributed costs operating schools derived benefits. private home schooling voluntary hence choice parents make eschew public school paid taxes. taxpayers n't pay additional amount decisions. childless taxpayers entitled similar benefits
|
["home", "schoolers"]
|
home schoolers
| 1
| 0
|
MoCrash
|
That's hooey. If parents who home school their children are entitled to a tax credit, then what about childless taxpayers who have to pay for public schools? Why shouldn't they receive a refund of the part of property taxes which goes toward local public schools, since they have neither contributed to the costs of operating those schools or derived benefits from them? Both private and home schooling are voluntary, and hence it is a choice that parents make to eschew the public school paid for by their taxes. Taxpayers shouldn't have to pay the additional amount for their decisions. If so, then childless taxpayers are entitled to similar benefits.
|
home schoolers
|
A5179-P
|
home school
| 1
| 3
| 17,299
| 3,171,714
|
[["'s", "hooey"], ["parents", "home", "school", "children", "entitled", "tax", "credit", "childless", "taxpayers", "pay", "public", "schools"], ["n't", "receive", "refund", "part", "property", "taxes", "goes", "toward", "local", "public", "schools", "since", "neither", "contributed", "costs", "operating", "schools", "derived", "benefits"], ["private", "home", "schooling", "voluntary", "hence", "choice", "parents", "make", "eschew", "public", "school", "paid", "taxes"], ["taxpayers", "n't", "pay", "additional", "amount", "decisions"], ["childless", "taxpayers", "entitled", "similar", "benefits"]]
|
[["VBZ", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBZ", "IN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "IN", "CC", "VBN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "VBN", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS"]]
|
's hooey. parents home school children entitled tax credit childless taxpayers pay public schools. n't receive refund part property taxes goes toward local public schools since neither contributed costs operating schools derived benefits. private home schooling voluntary hence choice parents make eschew public school paid taxes. taxpayers n't pay additional amount decisions. childless taxpayers entitled similar benefits
|
["home", "school"]
|
home school
| 1
| 1
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.