author string | post string | ori_topic string | ori_id string | new_topic string | label int64 | type_idx int64 | new_id int64 | arc_id int64 | text string | pos_text string | text_s string | topic string | topic_str string | seen? int64 | contains_topic? int64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Talesofgenji | This proposal has it backwards. Law is a professional degree. As in the case of licenced professional engineers, accredition needs to be be separated from education, or the educators, If the proposal of Mr. Allard woulb be adopted, Universities, in search of more students (law schools are highly profitable) would inevitably water down the standards. | law school | A201-P | law school | 0 | 1 | 2,249 | 16,181,387 | [["proposal", "backwards"], ["law", "professional", "degree"], ["case", "licenced", "professional", "engineers", "accredition", "needs", "separated", "education", "educators", "proposal", "mr.", "allard", "woulb", "adopted", "universities", "search", "students", "law", "schools", "highly", "profitable", "would", "inevitably", "water", "standards"]] | [["NN", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "VBN", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NNS"]] | proposal backwards. law professional degree. case licenced professional engineers accredition needs separated education educators proposal mr. allard woulb adopted universities search students law schools highly profitable would inevitably water standards | ["law", "school"] | law school | 1 | 1 |
Talesofgenji | This proposal has it backwards. Law is a professional degree. As in the case of licenced professional engineers, accredition needs to be be separated from education, or the educators, If the proposal of Mr. Allard woulb be adopted, Universities, in search of more students (law schools are highly profitable) would inevitably water down the standards. | law school | A201-P | law separated from educators | 0 | 3 | 2,250 | 16,181,387 | [["proposal", "backwards"], ["law", "professional", "degree"], ["case", "licenced", "professional", "engineers", "accredition", "needs", "separated", "education", "educators", "proposal", "mr.", "allard", "woulb", "adopted", "universities", "search", "students", "law", "schools", "highly", "profitable", "would", "inevitably", "water", "standards"]] | [["NN", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "VBN", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NNS"]] | proposal backwards. law professional degree. case licenced professional engineers accredition needs separated education educators proposal mr. allard woulb adopted universities search students law schools highly profitable would inevitably water standards | ["law", "separated", "educator"] | law separated educator | 1 | 0 |
Talesofgenji | This proposal has it backwards. Law is a professional degree. As in the case of licenced professional engineers, accredition needs to be be separated from education, or the educators, If the proposal of Mr. Allard woulb be adopted, Universities, in search of more students (law schools are highly profitable) would inevitably water down the standards. | law school | A201-P | law | 1 | 3 | 2,251 | 16,181,387 | [["proposal", "backwards"], ["law", "professional", "degree"], ["case", "licenced", "professional", "engineers", "accredition", "needs", "separated", "education", "educators", "proposal", "mr.", "allard", "woulb", "adopted", "universities", "search", "students", "law", "schools", "highly", "profitable", "would", "inevitably", "water", "standards"]] | [["NN", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "VBN", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NNS"]] | proposal backwards. law professional degree. case licenced professional engineers accredition needs separated education educators proposal mr. allard woulb adopted universities search students law schools highly profitable would inevitably water standards | ["law"] | law | 1 | 1 |
Dr. Ebbyguru | As a prof for 34 years, people ask me whether students are getting dumber or smarter. That would be very hard to quantify even with the most sophisticated measurement instruments. Empirically (that means observations done more or less scientifically) I see that there are still those that have it (intelligence, critical reasoning, a thirst for readiing, cognitive complexity) and those who don't (or just don't care). Additionally, most of us profs notice that there is a huge gap between those haves and have nots and that there is a huge gulf of mediocrity in our young people and citizenry. Unless you count ability to distinguish between Manolo and Jimmy Choo shoes, we are definitely becoming dumber. But remember, most of our empiricism is done at the local tavern. | people | A1831-P | people | 0 | 1 | 2,181 | 5,613,711 | [["prof", "34", "years", "people", "ask", "whether", "students", "getting", "dumber", "smarter"], ["would", "hard", "quantify", "even", "sophisticated", "measurement", "instruments"], ["empirically", "means", "observations", "done", "less", "scientifically", "see", "still", "intelligence", "critical", "reasoning", "thirst", "readiing", "cognitive", "complexity", "n't", "n't", "care"], ["additionally", "us", "profs", "notice", "huge", "gap", "haves", "nots", "huge", "gulf", "mediocrity", "young", "people", "citizenry"], ["unless", "count", "ability", "distinguish", "manolo", "jimmy", "choo", "shoes", "definitely", "becoming", "dumber"], ["remember", "empiricism", "done", "local", "tavern"]] | [["NN", "CD", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "IN", "NNS", "VBG", "JJR", "JJR"], ["MD", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "VBZ", "NNS", "VBN", "RBR", "RB", "VBP", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "RB", "VB"], ["RB", "PRP", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"], ["IN", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "JJR"], ["VB", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN"]] | prof 34 years people ask whether students getting dumber smarter. would hard quantify even sophisticated measurement instruments. empirically means observations done less scientifically see still intelligence critical reasoning thirst readiing cognitive complexity n't n't care. additionally us profs notice huge gap haves nots huge gulf mediocrity young people citizenry. unless count ability distinguish manolo jimmy choo shoes definitely becoming dumber. remember empiricism done local tavern | ["people"] | people | 1 | 1 |
Dr. Ebbyguru | As a prof for 34 years, people ask me whether students are getting dumber or smarter. That would be very hard to quantify even with the most sophisticated measurement instruments. Empirically (that means observations done more or less scientifically) I see that there are still those that have it (intelligence, critical reasoning, a thirst for readiing, cognitive complexity) and those who don't (or just don't care). Additionally, most of us profs notice that there is a huge gap between those haves and have nots and that there is a huge gulf of mediocrity in our young people and citizenry. Unless you count ability to distinguish between Manolo and Jimmy Choo shoes, we are definitely becoming dumber. But remember, most of our empiricism is done at the local tavern. | people | A1831-P | sophisticated measurement instruments | 0 | 3 | 2,182 | 5,613,711 | [["prof", "34", "years", "people", "ask", "whether", "students", "getting", "dumber", "smarter"], ["would", "hard", "quantify", "even", "sophisticated", "measurement", "instruments"], ["empirically", "means", "observations", "done", "less", "scientifically", "see", "still", "intelligence", "critical", "reasoning", "thirst", "readiing", "cognitive", "complexity", "n't", "n't", "care"], ["additionally", "us", "profs", "notice", "huge", "gap", "haves", "nots", "huge", "gulf", "mediocrity", "young", "people", "citizenry"], ["unless", "count", "ability", "distinguish", "manolo", "jimmy", "choo", "shoes", "definitely", "becoming", "dumber"], ["remember", "empiricism", "done", "local", "tavern"]] | [["NN", "CD", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "IN", "NNS", "VBG", "JJR", "JJR"], ["MD", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "VBZ", "NNS", "VBN", "RBR", "RB", "VBP", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "RB", "VB"], ["RB", "PRP", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"], ["IN", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "JJR"], ["VB", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN"]] | prof 34 years people ask whether students getting dumber smarter. would hard quantify even sophisticated measurement instruments. empirically means observations done less scientifically see still intelligence critical reasoning thirst readiing cognitive complexity n't n't care. additionally us profs notice huge gap haves nots huge gulf mediocrity young people citizenry. unless count ability distinguish manolo jimmy choo shoes definitely becoming dumber. remember empiricism done local tavern | ["sophisticated", "measurement", "instrument"] | sophisticated measurement instrument | 1 | 1 |
Dr. Ebbyguru | As a prof for 34 years, people ask me whether students are getting dumber or smarter. That would be very hard to quantify even with the most sophisticated measurement instruments. Empirically (that means observations done more or less scientifically) I see that there are still those that have it (intelligence, critical reasoning, a thirst for readiing, cognitive complexity) and those who don't (or just don't care). Additionally, most of us profs notice that there is a huge gap between those haves and have nots and that there is a huge gulf of mediocrity in our young people and citizenry. Unless you count ability to distinguish between Manolo and Jimmy Choo shoes, we are definitely becoming dumber. But remember, most of our empiricism is done at the local tavern. | people | A1831-P | current students' attitudes | 0 | 2 | 2,183 | 5,613,711 | [["prof", "34", "years", "people", "ask", "whether", "students", "getting", "dumber", "smarter"], ["would", "hard", "quantify", "even", "sophisticated", "measurement", "instruments"], ["empirically", "means", "observations", "done", "less", "scientifically", "see", "still", "intelligence", "critical", "reasoning", "thirst", "readiing", "cognitive", "complexity", "n't", "n't", "care"], ["additionally", "us", "profs", "notice", "huge", "gap", "haves", "nots", "huge", "gulf", "mediocrity", "young", "people", "citizenry"], ["unless", "count", "ability", "distinguish", "manolo", "jimmy", "choo", "shoes", "definitely", "becoming", "dumber"], ["remember", "empiricism", "done", "local", "tavern"]] | [["NN", "CD", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "IN", "NNS", "VBG", "JJR", "JJR"], ["MD", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "VBZ", "NNS", "VBN", "RBR", "RB", "VBP", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "RB", "VB"], ["RB", "PRP", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"], ["IN", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "JJR"], ["VB", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN"]] | prof 34 years people ask whether students getting dumber smarter. would hard quantify even sophisticated measurement instruments. empirically means observations done less scientifically see still intelligence critical reasoning thirst readiing cognitive complexity n't n't care. additionally us profs notice huge gap haves nots huge gulf mediocrity young people citizenry. unless count ability distinguish manolo jimmy choo shoes definitely becoming dumber. remember empiricism done local tavern | ["current", "student", "attitude"] | current student attitude | 1 | 0 |
Dr. Ebbyguru | As a prof for 34 years, people ask me whether students are getting dumber or smarter. That would be very hard to quantify even with the most sophisticated measurement instruments. Empirically (that means observations done more or less scientifically) I see that there are still those that have it (intelligence, critical reasoning, a thirst for readiing, cognitive complexity) and those who don't (or just don't care). Additionally, most of us profs notice that there is a huge gap between those haves and have nots and that there is a huge gulf of mediocrity in our young people and citizenry. Unless you count ability to distinguish between Manolo and Jimmy Choo shoes, we are definitely becoming dumber. But remember, most of our empiricism is done at the local tavern. | people | A1831-P | a professor's emperical opinion | 0 | 3 | 2,184 | 5,613,711 | [["prof", "34", "years", "people", "ask", "whether", "students", "getting", "dumber", "smarter"], ["would", "hard", "quantify", "even", "sophisticated", "measurement", "instruments"], ["empirically", "means", "observations", "done", "less", "scientifically", "see", "still", "intelligence", "critical", "reasoning", "thirst", "readiing", "cognitive", "complexity", "n't", "n't", "care"], ["additionally", "us", "profs", "notice", "huge", "gap", "haves", "nots", "huge", "gulf", "mediocrity", "young", "people", "citizenry"], ["unless", "count", "ability", "distinguish", "manolo", "jimmy", "choo", "shoes", "definitely", "becoming", "dumber"], ["remember", "empiricism", "done", "local", "tavern"]] | [["NN", "CD", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "IN", "NNS", "VBG", "JJR", "JJR"], ["MD", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "VBZ", "NNS", "VBN", "RBR", "RB", "VBP", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "RB", "VB"], ["RB", "PRP", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"], ["IN", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "JJR"], ["VB", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN"]] | prof 34 years people ask whether students getting dumber smarter. would hard quantify even sophisticated measurement instruments. empirically means observations done less scientifically see still intelligence critical reasoning thirst readiing cognitive complexity n't n't care. additionally us profs notice huge gap haves nots huge gulf mediocrity young people citizenry. unless count ability distinguish manolo jimmy choo shoes definitely becoming dumber. remember empiricism done local tavern | ["professor", "'s", "empirical", "opinion"] | professor 's empirical opinion | 1 | 0 |
James B. Huntington | Wrong! Two reasons. One, Malthusianism does not hold, since resource production can go up exponentially too. Two, the population will peak out at 12-15 billion or so, when it will start to shrink, as it has been doing in Europe for decades now. Uncontrolled extrapolation is a trap to avoid. | overcrowding | A1707-P | overcrowding | 0 | 1 | 4,099 | 15,165,585 | [["wrong"], ["two", "reasons"], ["one", "malthusianism", "hold", "since", "resource", "production", "go", "exponentially"], ["two", "population", "peak", "12", "15", "billion", "start", "shrink", "europe", "decades"], ["uncontrolled", "extrapolation", "trap", "avoid"]] | [["JJ"], ["CD", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "VB", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["CD", "NN", "VB", "CD", "CD", "CD", "VB", "VB", "NNP", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB"]] | wrong. two reasons. one malthusianism hold since resource production go exponentially. two population peak 12 15 billion start shrink europe decades. uncontrolled extrapolation trap avoid | ["overcrowding"] | overcrowding | 1 | 0 |
James B. Huntington | Wrong! Two reasons. One, Malthusianism does not hold, since resource production can go up exponentially too. Two, the population will peak out at 12-15 billion or so, when it will start to shrink, as it has been doing in Europe for decades now. Uncontrolled extrapolation is a trap to avoid. | overcrowding | A1707-P | over population | 0 | 3 | 4,100 | 15,165,585 | [["wrong"], ["two", "reasons"], ["one", "malthusianism", "hold", "since", "resource", "production", "go", "exponentially"], ["two", "population", "peak", "12", "15", "billion", "start", "shrink", "europe", "decades"], ["uncontrolled", "extrapolation", "trap", "avoid"]] | [["JJ"], ["CD", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "VB", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["CD", "NN", "VB", "CD", "CD", "CD", "VB", "VB", "NNP", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB"]] | wrong. two reasons. one malthusianism hold since resource production go exponentially. two population peak 12 15 billion start shrink europe decades. uncontrolled extrapolation trap avoid | ["population"] | population | 1 | 1 |
James B. Huntington | Wrong! Two reasons. One, Malthusianism does not hold, since resource production can go up exponentially too. Two, the population will peak out at 12-15 billion or so, when it will start to shrink, as it has been doing in Europe for decades now. Uncontrolled extrapolation is a trap to avoid. | overcrowding | A1707-P | malthusianism | 0 | 3 | 4,101 | 15,165,585 | [["wrong"], ["two", "reasons"], ["one", "malthusianism", "hold", "since", "resource", "production", "go", "exponentially"], ["two", "population", "peak", "12", "15", "billion", "start", "shrink", "europe", "decades"], ["uncontrolled", "extrapolation", "trap", "avoid"]] | [["JJ"], ["CD", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "VB", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["CD", "NN", "VB", "CD", "CD", "CD", "VB", "VB", "NNP", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB"]] | wrong. two reasons. one malthusianism hold since resource production go exponentially. two population peak 12 15 billion start shrink europe decades. uncontrolled extrapolation trap avoid | ["malthusianism"] | malthusianism | 1 | 1 |
James B. Huntington | Wrong! Two reasons. One, Malthusianism does not hold, since resource production can go up exponentially too. Two, the population will peak out at 12-15 billion or so, when it will start to shrink, as it has been doing in Europe for decades now. Uncontrolled extrapolation is a trap to avoid. | a legitimate threat | A1708-P | a legitimate threat | 1 | 1 | 7,629 | 15,165,585 | [["wrong"], ["two", "reasons"], ["one", "malthusianism", "hold", "since", "resource", "production", "go", "exponentially"], ["two", "population", "peak", "12", "15", "billion", "start", "shrink", "europe", "decades"], ["uncontrolled", "extrapolation", "trap", "avoid"]] | [["JJ"], ["CD", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "VB", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["CD", "NN", "VB", "CD", "CD", "CD", "VB", "VB", "NNP", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB"]] | wrong. two reasons. one malthusianism hold since resource production go exponentially. two population peak 12 15 billion start shrink europe decades. uncontrolled extrapolation trap avoid | ["legitimate", "threat"] | legitimate threat | 1 | 0 |
James B. Huntington | Wrong! Two reasons. One, Malthusianism does not hold, since resource production can go up exponentially too. Two, the population will peak out at 12-15 billion or so, when it will start to shrink, as it has been doing in Europe for decades now. Uncontrolled extrapolation is a trap to avoid. | a legitimate threat | A1708-P | malthusianism | 1 | 3 | 7,630 | 15,165,585 | [["wrong"], ["two", "reasons"], ["one", "malthusianism", "hold", "since", "resource", "production", "go", "exponentially"], ["two", "population", "peak", "12", "15", "billion", "start", "shrink", "europe", "decades"], ["uncontrolled", "extrapolation", "trap", "avoid"]] | [["JJ"], ["CD", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "VB", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["CD", "NN", "VB", "CD", "CD", "CD", "VB", "VB", "NNP", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB"]] | wrong. two reasons. one malthusianism hold since resource production go exponentially. two population peak 12 15 billion start shrink europe decades. uncontrolled extrapolation trap avoid | ["malthusianism"] | malthusianism | 1 | 1 |
James B. Huntington | Wrong! Two reasons. One, Malthusianism does not hold, since resource production can go up exponentially too. Two, the population will peak out at 12-15 billion or so, when it will start to shrink, as it has been doing in Europe for decades now. Uncontrolled extrapolation is a trap to avoid. | a legitimate threat | A1708-P | uncontrolled extrapolation | 1 | 3 | 7,631 | 15,165,585 | [["wrong"], ["two", "reasons"], ["one", "malthusianism", "hold", "since", "resource", "production", "go", "exponentially"], ["two", "population", "peak", "12", "15", "billion", "start", "shrink", "europe", "decades"], ["uncontrolled", "extrapolation", "trap", "avoid"]] | [["JJ"], ["CD", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "VB", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["CD", "NN", "VB", "CD", "CD", "CD", "VB", "VB", "NNP", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB"]] | wrong. two reasons. one malthusianism hold since resource production go exponentially. two population peak 12 15 billion start shrink europe decades. uncontrolled extrapolation trap avoid | ["uncontrolled", "extrapolation"] | uncontrolled extrapolation | 1 | 1 |
James B. Huntington | Wrong! Two reasons. One, Malthusianism does not hold, since resource production can go up exponentially too. Two, the population will peak out at 12-15 billion or so, when it will start to shrink, as it has been doing in Europe for decades now. Uncontrolled extrapolation is a trap to avoid. | a legitimate threat | A1708-P | malthusianism | 0 | 2 | 7,632 | 15,165,585 | [["wrong"], ["two", "reasons"], ["one", "malthusianism", "hold", "since", "resource", "production", "go", "exponentially"], ["two", "population", "peak", "12", "15", "billion", "start", "shrink", "europe", "decades"], ["uncontrolled", "extrapolation", "trap", "avoid"]] | [["JJ"], ["CD", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "VB", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["CD", "NN", "VB", "CD", "CD", "CD", "VB", "VB", "NNP", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB"]] | wrong. two reasons. one malthusianism hold since resource production go exponentially. two population peak 12 15 billion start shrink europe decades. uncontrolled extrapolation trap avoid | ["malthusianism"] | malthusianism | 1 | 1 |
James B. Huntington | Wrong! Two reasons. One, Malthusianism does not hold, since resource production can go up exponentially too. Two, the population will peak out at 12-15 billion or so, when it will start to shrink, as it has been doing in Europe for decades now. Uncontrolled extrapolation is a trap to avoid. | a legitimate threat | A1708-P | uncontrolled growth | 0 | 3 | 7,633 | 15,165,585 | [["wrong"], ["two", "reasons"], ["one", "malthusianism", "hold", "since", "resource", "production", "go", "exponentially"], ["two", "population", "peak", "12", "15", "billion", "start", "shrink", "europe", "decades"], ["uncontrolled", "extrapolation", "trap", "avoid"]] | [["JJ"], ["CD", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "VB", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["CD", "NN", "VB", "CD", "CD", "CD", "VB", "VB", "NNP", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB"]] | wrong. two reasons. one malthusianism hold since resource production go exponentially. two population peak 12 15 billion start shrink europe decades. uncontrolled extrapolation trap avoid | ["uncontrolled", "growth"] | uncontrolled growth | 1 | 0 |
scohol | The changes planned by Ryan and his compatriots will do nothing to help, and only hurt the program and the seniors it was designed to help in the long run. Privatization of any insurances at this point is like letting the fox run loos in the hen house. Can anyone show us where privatization has made the cost of running a government service cheaper AND improved the quality, or even maintained the quality of the program? | medicare | A1903-P | medicare | 1 | 1 | 17,784 | 20,654,228 | [["changes", "planned", "ryan", "compatriots", "nothing", "help", "hurt", "program", "seniors", "designed", "help", "long", "run"], ["privatization", "insurances", "point", "like", "letting", "fox", "run", "loos", "hen", "house"], ["anyone", "show", "us", "privatization", "made", "cost", "running", "government", "service", "cheaper", "improved", "quality", "even", "maintained", "quality", "program"]] | [["NNS", "VBN", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "NN", "IN", "VBG", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "PRP", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "JJR", "VBD", "NN", "RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN"]] | changes planned ryan compatriots nothing help hurt program seniors designed help long run. privatization insurances point like letting fox run loos hen house. anyone show us privatization made cost running government service cheaper improved quality even maintained quality program | ["medicare"] | medicare | 1 | 0 |
scohol | The changes planned by Ryan and his compatriots will do nothing to help, and only hurt the program and the seniors it was designed to help in the long run. Privatization of any insurances at this point is like letting the fox run loos in the hen house. Can anyone show us where privatization has made the cost of running a government service cheaper AND improved the quality, or even maintained the quality of the program? | medicare | A1903-P | private insurance | 1 | 3 | 17,785 | 20,654,228 | [["changes", "planned", "ryan", "compatriots", "nothing", "help", "hurt", "program", "seniors", "designed", "help", "long", "run"], ["privatization", "insurances", "point", "like", "letting", "fox", "run", "loos", "hen", "house"], ["anyone", "show", "us", "privatization", "made", "cost", "running", "government", "service", "cheaper", "improved", "quality", "even", "maintained", "quality", "program"]] | [["NNS", "VBN", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "NN", "IN", "VBG", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "PRP", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "JJR", "VBD", "NN", "RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN"]] | changes planned ryan compatriots nothing help hurt program seniors designed help long run. privatization insurances point like letting fox run loos hen house. anyone show us privatization made cost running government service cheaper improved quality even maintained quality program | ["private", "insurance"] | private insurance | 1 | 0 |
scohol | The changes planned by Ryan and his compatriots will do nothing to help, and only hurt the program and the seniors it was designed to help in the long run. Privatization of any insurances at this point is like letting the fox run loos in the hen house. Can anyone show us where privatization has made the cost of running a government service cheaper AND improved the quality, or even maintained the quality of the program? | medicare | A1903-P | privatization | 0 | 2 | 17,786 | 20,654,228 | [["changes", "planned", "ryan", "compatriots", "nothing", "help", "hurt", "program", "seniors", "designed", "help", "long", "run"], ["privatization", "insurances", "point", "like", "letting", "fox", "run", "loos", "hen", "house"], ["anyone", "show", "us", "privatization", "made", "cost", "running", "government", "service", "cheaper", "improved", "quality", "even", "maintained", "quality", "program"]] | [["NNS", "VBN", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "NN", "IN", "VBG", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "PRP", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "JJR", "VBD", "NN", "RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN"]] | changes planned ryan compatriots nothing help hurt program seniors designed help long run. privatization insurances point like letting fox run loos hen house. anyone show us privatization made cost running government service cheaper improved quality even maintained quality program | ["privatization"] | privatization | 1 | 1 |
scohol | The changes planned by Ryan and his compatriots will do nothing to help, and only hurt the program and the seniors it was designed to help in the long run. Privatization of any insurances at this point is like letting the fox run loos in the hen house. Can anyone show us where privatization has made the cost of running a government service cheaper AND improved the quality, or even maintained the quality of the program? | medicare | A1903-P | insurance | 0 | 3 | 17,787 | 20,654,228 | [["changes", "planned", "ryan", "compatriots", "nothing", "help", "hurt", "program", "seniors", "designed", "help", "long", "run"], ["privatization", "insurances", "point", "like", "letting", "fox", "run", "loos", "hen", "house"], ["anyone", "show", "us", "privatization", "made", "cost", "running", "government", "service", "cheaper", "improved", "quality", "even", "maintained", "quality", "program"]] | [["NNS", "VBN", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "NN", "IN", "VBG", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "PRP", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "JJR", "VBD", "NN", "RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN"]] | changes planned ryan compatriots nothing help hurt program seniors designed help long run. privatization insurances point like letting fox run loos hen house. anyone show us privatization made cost running government service cheaper improved quality even maintained quality program | ["insurance"] | insurance | 1 | 1 |
Anonymous | Many have already said this, but I wish to add my voice to their complaint: it is extremely misleading to say that "all net employment gains since November 2007 have gone to immigrants." Furthermore, even if you were to issue the more accurate statement that "immigrants have seen a net gain in employment compared to 2007, while native-born Americans have seen a net loss," you would still be intentionally misleading your readers, and here's why: By omission, you are implying that the gains of immigrants and the losses of native-born Americans are directly intertwined. In some ways, perhaps they are. However, you are ignoring the fact that the economy shed 8.7 MILLION jobs in the "Great Recession," having to do primarily with the recklessness of our financial services industry and almost nothing to do with immigrants. A struggling recovery may have favored immigrants in certain sectors, but that doesn't mean that they, as a group, are to blame for America's labor market woes. We have perfectly good and deserving folks to blame for that right here at home. | the threat | A3463-P | the threat | 0 | 1 | 14,892 | 13,764,758 | [["many", "already", "said", "wish", "add", "voice", "complaint", "extremely", "misleading", "say", "net", "employment", "gains", "since", "november", "2007", "gone", "immigrants"], ["furthermore", "even", "issue", "accurate", "statement", "immigrants", "seen", "net", "gain", "employment", "compared", "2007", "native", "born", "americans", "seen", "net", "loss", "would", "still", "intentionally", "misleading", "readers", "'s", "omission", "implying", "gains", "immigrants", "losses", "native", "born", "americans", "directly", "intertwined"], ["ways", "perhaps"], ["however", "ignoring", "fact", "economy", "shed", "8.7", "million", "jobs", "great", "recession", "primarily", "recklessness", "financial", "services", "industry", "almost", "nothing", "immigrants"], ["struggling", "recovery", "may", "favored", "immigrants", "certain", "sectors", "n't", "mean", "group", "blame", "america", "'s", "labor", "market", "woes"], ["perfectly", "good", "deserving", "folks", "blame", "right", "home"]] | [["JJ", "RB", "VBN", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "CD", "VBN", "NNS"], ["RB", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "CD", "JJ", "VBN", "NNPS", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "RB", "RB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "NNPS", "RB", "VBN"], ["NNS", "RB"], ["RB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBG", "NN", "MD", "VBN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NNP", "POS", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "VBG", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "NN"]] | many already said wish add voice complaint extremely misleading say net employment gains since november 2007 gone immigrants. furthermore even issue accurate statement immigrants seen net gain employment compared 2007 native born americans seen net loss would still intentionally misleading readers 's omission implying gains immigrants losses native born americans directly intertwined. ways perhaps. however ignoring fact economy shed 8.7 million jobs great recession primarily recklessness financial services industry almost nothing immigrants. struggling recovery may favored immigrants certain sectors n't mean group blame america 's labor market woes. perfectly good deserving folks blame right home | ["threat"] | threat | 1 | 0 |
Anonymous | Many have already said this, but I wish to add my voice to their complaint: it is extremely misleading to say that "all net employment gains since November 2007 have gone to immigrants." Furthermore, even if you were to issue the more accurate statement that "immigrants have seen a net gain in employment compared to 2007, while native-born Americans have seen a net loss," you would still be intentionally misleading your readers, and here's why: By omission, you are implying that the gains of immigrants and the losses of native-born Americans are directly intertwined. In some ways, perhaps they are. However, you are ignoring the fact that the economy shed 8.7 MILLION jobs in the "Great Recession," having to do primarily with the recklessness of our financial services industry and almost nothing to do with immigrants. A struggling recovery may have favored immigrants in certain sectors, but that doesn't mean that they, as a group, are to blame for America's labor market woes. We have perfectly good and deserving folks to blame for that right here at home. | the threat | A3463-P | immigrant employment effect | 0 | 3 | 14,893 | 13,764,758 | [["many", "already", "said", "wish", "add", "voice", "complaint", "extremely", "misleading", "say", "net", "employment", "gains", "since", "november", "2007", "gone", "immigrants"], ["furthermore", "even", "issue", "accurate", "statement", "immigrants", "seen", "net", "gain", "employment", "compared", "2007", "native", "born", "americans", "seen", "net", "loss", "would", "still", "intentionally", "misleading", "readers", "'s", "omission", "implying", "gains", "immigrants", "losses", "native", "born", "americans", "directly", "intertwined"], ["ways", "perhaps"], ["however", "ignoring", "fact", "economy", "shed", "8.7", "million", "jobs", "great", "recession", "primarily", "recklessness", "financial", "services", "industry", "almost", "nothing", "immigrants"], ["struggling", "recovery", "may", "favored", "immigrants", "certain", "sectors", "n't", "mean", "group", "blame", "america", "'s", "labor", "market", "woes"], ["perfectly", "good", "deserving", "folks", "blame", "right", "home"]] | [["JJ", "RB", "VBN", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "CD", "VBN", "NNS"], ["RB", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "CD", "JJ", "VBN", "NNPS", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "RB", "RB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "NNPS", "RB", "VBN"], ["NNS", "RB"], ["RB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBG", "NN", "MD", "VBN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NNP", "POS", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "VBG", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "NN"]] | many already said wish add voice complaint extremely misleading say net employment gains since november 2007 gone immigrants. furthermore even issue accurate statement immigrants seen net gain employment compared 2007 native born americans seen net loss would still intentionally misleading readers 's omission implying gains immigrants losses native born americans directly intertwined. ways perhaps. however ignoring fact economy shed 8.7 million jobs great recession primarily recklessness financial services industry almost nothing immigrants. struggling recovery may favored immigrants certain sectors n't mean group blame america 's labor market woes. perfectly good deserving folks blame right home | ["immigrant", "employment", "effect"] | immigrant employment effect | 1 | 0 |
Anonymous | Many have already said this, but I wish to add my voice to their complaint: it is extremely misleading to say that "all net employment gains since November 2007 have gone to immigrants." Furthermore, even if you were to issue the more accurate statement that "immigrants have seen a net gain in employment compared to 2007, while native-born Americans have seen a net loss," you would still be intentionally misleading your readers, and here's why: By omission, you are implying that the gains of immigrants and the losses of native-born Americans are directly intertwined. In some ways, perhaps they are. However, you are ignoring the fact that the economy shed 8.7 MILLION jobs in the "Great Recession," having to do primarily with the recklessness of our financial services industry and almost nothing to do with immigrants. A struggling recovery may have favored immigrants in certain sectors, but that doesn't mean that they, as a group, are to blame for America's labor market woes. We have perfectly good and deserving folks to blame for that right here at home. | the threat | A3463-P | immigrant | 1 | 2 | 14,894 | 13,764,758 | [["many", "already", "said", "wish", "add", "voice", "complaint", "extremely", "misleading", "say", "net", "employment", "gains", "since", "november", "2007", "gone", "immigrants"], ["furthermore", "even", "issue", "accurate", "statement", "immigrants", "seen", "net", "gain", "employment", "compared", "2007", "native", "born", "americans", "seen", "net", "loss", "would", "still", "intentionally", "misleading", "readers", "'s", "omission", "implying", "gains", "immigrants", "losses", "native", "born", "americans", "directly", "intertwined"], ["ways", "perhaps"], ["however", "ignoring", "fact", "economy", "shed", "8.7", "million", "jobs", "great", "recession", "primarily", "recklessness", "financial", "services", "industry", "almost", "nothing", "immigrants"], ["struggling", "recovery", "may", "favored", "immigrants", "certain", "sectors", "n't", "mean", "group", "blame", "america", "'s", "labor", "market", "woes"], ["perfectly", "good", "deserving", "folks", "blame", "right", "home"]] | [["JJ", "RB", "VBN", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "CD", "VBN", "NNS"], ["RB", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "CD", "JJ", "VBN", "NNPS", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "RB", "RB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "NNPS", "RB", "VBN"], ["NNS", "RB"], ["RB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBG", "NN", "MD", "VBN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NNP", "POS", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "VBG", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "NN"]] | many already said wish add voice complaint extremely misleading say net employment gains since november 2007 gone immigrants. furthermore even issue accurate statement immigrants seen net gain employment compared 2007 native born americans seen net loss would still intentionally misleading readers 's omission implying gains immigrants losses native born americans directly intertwined. ways perhaps. however ignoring fact economy shed 8.7 million jobs great recession primarily recklessness financial services industry almost nothing immigrants. struggling recovery may favored immigrants certain sectors n't mean group blame america 's labor market woes. perfectly good deserving folks blame right home | ["immigrant"] | immigrant | 1 | 1 |
Anonymous | Many have already said this, but I wish to add my voice to their complaint: it is extremely misleading to say that "all net employment gains since November 2007 have gone to immigrants." Furthermore, even if you were to issue the more accurate statement that "immigrants have seen a net gain in employment compared to 2007, while native-born Americans have seen a net loss," you would still be intentionally misleading your readers, and here's why: By omission, you are implying that the gains of immigrants and the losses of native-born Americans are directly intertwined. In some ways, perhaps they are. However, you are ignoring the fact that the economy shed 8.7 MILLION jobs in the "Great Recession," having to do primarily with the recklessness of our financial services industry and almost nothing to do with immigrants. A struggling recovery may have favored immigrants in certain sectors, but that doesn't mean that they, as a group, are to blame for America's labor market woes. We have perfectly good and deserving folks to blame for that right here at home. | the threat | A3463-P | employment | 1 | 3 | 14,895 | 13,764,758 | [["many", "already", "said", "wish", "add", "voice", "complaint", "extremely", "misleading", "say", "net", "employment", "gains", "since", "november", "2007", "gone", "immigrants"], ["furthermore", "even", "issue", "accurate", "statement", "immigrants", "seen", "net", "gain", "employment", "compared", "2007", "native", "born", "americans", "seen", "net", "loss", "would", "still", "intentionally", "misleading", "readers", "'s", "omission", "implying", "gains", "immigrants", "losses", "native", "born", "americans", "directly", "intertwined"], ["ways", "perhaps"], ["however", "ignoring", "fact", "economy", "shed", "8.7", "million", "jobs", "great", "recession", "primarily", "recklessness", "financial", "services", "industry", "almost", "nothing", "immigrants"], ["struggling", "recovery", "may", "favored", "immigrants", "certain", "sectors", "n't", "mean", "group", "blame", "america", "'s", "labor", "market", "woes"], ["perfectly", "good", "deserving", "folks", "blame", "right", "home"]] | [["JJ", "RB", "VBN", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "CD", "VBN", "NNS"], ["RB", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "CD", "JJ", "VBN", "NNPS", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "MD", "RB", "RB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "NNPS", "RB", "VBN"], ["NNS", "RB"], ["RB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBG", "NN", "MD", "VBN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NNP", "POS", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "VBG", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "NN"]] | many already said wish add voice complaint extremely misleading say net employment gains since november 2007 gone immigrants. furthermore even issue accurate statement immigrants seen net gain employment compared 2007 native born americans seen net loss would still intentionally misleading readers 's omission implying gains immigrants losses native born americans directly intertwined. ways perhaps. however ignoring fact economy shed 8.7 million jobs great recession primarily recklessness financial services industry almost nothing immigrants. struggling recovery may favored immigrants certain sectors n't mean group blame america 's labor market woes. perfectly good deserving folks blame right home | ["employment"] | employment | 1 | 1 |
Judyw | Any intervention is a slippery slope to full involvement which is why we should stay as far away from Syria as possible no matter what they do. Lookt at Libya -- we started out with R2P just to save those Jihadist in Benghazi from Qaddafi. Well it quickly morpher into regime change in violation of the UN SC resolution. So we acted outside the law. We didn't care we are the US - we are not bound by any LAW not even one passed in Congress. And regime change in Libya led to the muder of a US Ambassador -- does anyone think that what is about to happen will end any differently. The President will lie to us as we were lied to about NSA and lied to about US intentions in Libya. In another month we will be bleeding and dying in Syria to remove Assad and install Al Nusra in power -- the so called FSA will either defect to Al Nusra or be buthchered by them. This is a disaster in the making for the US. | us | A4038-P | us intervention in syria | 0 | 2 | 2,932 | 9,832,599 | [["intervention", "slippery", "slope", "full", "involvement", "stay", "far", "away", "syria", "possible", "matter"], ["lookt", "libya", "--", "started", "r2p", "save", "jihadist", "benghazi", "qaddafi"], ["well", "quickly", "morpher", "regime", "change", "violation", "un", "sc", "resolution"], ["acted", "outside", "law"], ["n't", "care", "us", "bound", "law", "even", "one", "passed", "congress"], ["regime", "change", "libya", "led", "muder", "us", "ambassador", "--", "anyone", "think", "happen", "end", "differently"], ["president", "lie", "us", "lied", "nsa", "lied", "us", "intentions", "libya"], ["another", "month", "bleeding", "dying", "syria", "remove", "assad", "install", "al", "nusra", "power", "--", "called", "fsa", "either", "defect", "al", "nusra", "buthchered"], ["disaster", "making", "us"]] | [["NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "RB"], ["NNP", "NNP", ":", "VBD", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP"], ["UH", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBD", "IN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NNP", "VBN", "NNP", "RB", "CD", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP", "VBD", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", ":", "NN", "VB", "VB", "VB", "RB"], ["NNP", "VB", "PRP", "VBN", "NNP", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "NNP"], ["DT", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", ":", "VBN", "NNP", "CC", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP"]] | intervention slippery slope full involvement stay far away syria possible matter. lookt libya -- started r2p save jihadist benghazi qaddafi. well quickly morpher regime change violation un sc resolution. acted outside law. n't care us bound law even one passed congress. regime change libya led muder us ambassador -- anyone think happen end differently. president lie us lied nsa lied us intentions libya. another month bleeding dying syria remove assad install al nusra power -- called fsa either defect al nusra buthchered. disaster making us | ["us", "intervention", "syria"] | us intervention syria | 1 | 0 |
Judyw | Any intervention is a slippery slope to full involvement which is why we should stay as far away from Syria as possible no matter what they do. Lookt at Libya -- we started out with R2P just to save those Jihadist in Benghazi from Qaddafi. Well it quickly morpher into regime change in violation of the UN SC resolution. So we acted outside the law. We didn't care we are the US - we are not bound by any LAW not even one passed in Congress. And regime change in Libya led to the muder of a US Ambassador -- does anyone think that what is about to happen will end any differently. The President will lie to us as we were lied to about NSA and lied to about US intentions in Libya. In another month we will be bleeding and dying in Syria to remove Assad and install Al Nusra in power -- the so called FSA will either defect to Al Nusra or be buthchered by them. This is a disaster in the making for the US. | us | A4038-P | us against syria | 1 | 2 | 2,933 | 9,832,599 | [["intervention", "slippery", "slope", "full", "involvement", "stay", "far", "away", "syria", "possible", "matter"], ["lookt", "libya", "--", "started", "r2p", "save", "jihadist", "benghazi", "qaddafi"], ["well", "quickly", "morpher", "regime", "change", "violation", "un", "sc", "resolution"], ["acted", "outside", "law"], ["n't", "care", "us", "bound", "law", "even", "one", "passed", "congress"], ["regime", "change", "libya", "led", "muder", "us", "ambassador", "--", "anyone", "think", "happen", "end", "differently"], ["president", "lie", "us", "lied", "nsa", "lied", "us", "intentions", "libya"], ["another", "month", "bleeding", "dying", "syria", "remove", "assad", "install", "al", "nusra", "power", "--", "called", "fsa", "either", "defect", "al", "nusra", "buthchered"], ["disaster", "making", "us"]] | [["NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "RB"], ["NNP", "NNP", ":", "VBD", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP"], ["UH", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBD", "IN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NNP", "VBN", "NNP", "RB", "CD", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP", "VBD", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", ":", "NN", "VB", "VB", "VB", "RB"], ["NNP", "VB", "PRP", "VBN", "NNP", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "NNP"], ["DT", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", ":", "VBN", "NNP", "CC", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP"]] | intervention slippery slope full involvement stay far away syria possible matter. lookt libya -- started r2p save jihadist benghazi qaddafi. well quickly morpher regime change violation un sc resolution. acted outside law. n't care us bound law even one passed congress. regime change libya led muder us ambassador -- anyone think happen end differently. president lie us lied nsa lied us intentions libya. another month bleeding dying syria remove assad install al nusra power -- called fsa either defect al nusra buthchered. disaster making us | ["us", "syria"] | us syria | 1 | 0 |
Judyw | Any intervention is a slippery slope to full involvement which is why we should stay as far away from Syria as possible no matter what they do. Lookt at Libya -- we started out with R2P just to save those Jihadist in Benghazi from Qaddafi. Well it quickly morpher into regime change in violation of the UN SC resolution. So we acted outside the law. We didn't care we are the US - we are not bound by any LAW not even one passed in Congress. And regime change in Libya led to the muder of a US Ambassador -- does anyone think that what is about to happen will end any differently. The President will lie to us as we were lied to about NSA and lied to about US intentions in Libya. In another month we will be bleeding and dying in Syria to remove Assad and install Al Nusra in power -- the so called FSA will either defect to Al Nusra or be buthchered by them. This is a disaster in the making for the US. | us | A4038-P | us foreign policy | 0 | 2 | 2,934 | 9,832,599 | [["intervention", "slippery", "slope", "full", "involvement", "stay", "far", "away", "syria", "possible", "matter"], ["lookt", "libya", "--", "started", "r2p", "save", "jihadist", "benghazi", "qaddafi"], ["well", "quickly", "morpher", "regime", "change", "violation", "un", "sc", "resolution"], ["acted", "outside", "law"], ["n't", "care", "us", "bound", "law", "even", "one", "passed", "congress"], ["regime", "change", "libya", "led", "muder", "us", "ambassador", "--", "anyone", "think", "happen", "end", "differently"], ["president", "lie", "us", "lied", "nsa", "lied", "us", "intentions", "libya"], ["another", "month", "bleeding", "dying", "syria", "remove", "assad", "install", "al", "nusra", "power", "--", "called", "fsa", "either", "defect", "al", "nusra", "buthchered"], ["disaster", "making", "us"]] | [["NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "RB"], ["NNP", "NNP", ":", "VBD", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP"], ["UH", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBD", "IN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NNP", "VBN", "NNP", "RB", "CD", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP", "VBD", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", ":", "NN", "VB", "VB", "VB", "RB"], ["NNP", "VB", "PRP", "VBN", "NNP", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "NNP"], ["DT", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", ":", "VBN", "NNP", "CC", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP"]] | intervention slippery slope full involvement stay far away syria possible matter. lookt libya -- started r2p save jihadist benghazi qaddafi. well quickly morpher regime change violation un sc resolution. acted outside law. n't care us bound law even one passed congress. regime change libya led muder us ambassador -- anyone think happen end differently. president lie us lied nsa lied us intentions libya. another month bleeding dying syria remove assad install al nusra power -- called fsa either defect al nusra buthchered. disaster making us | ["us", "foreign", "policy"] | us foreign policy | 1 | 0 |
Judyw | Any intervention is a slippery slope to full involvement which is why we should stay as far away from Syria as possible no matter what they do. Lookt at Libya -- we started out with R2P just to save those Jihadist in Benghazi from Qaddafi. Well it quickly morpher into regime change in violation of the UN SC resolution. So we acted outside the law. We didn't care we are the US - we are not bound by any LAW not even one passed in Congress. And regime change in Libya led to the muder of a US Ambassador -- does anyone think that what is about to happen will end any differently. The President will lie to us as we were lied to about NSA and lied to about US intentions in Libya. In another month we will be bleeding and dying in Syria to remove Assad and install Al Nusra in power -- the so called FSA will either defect to Al Nusra or be buthchered by them. This is a disaster in the making for the US. | us | A4038-P | war | 0 | 3 | 2,935 | 9,832,599 | [["intervention", "slippery", "slope", "full", "involvement", "stay", "far", "away", "syria", "possible", "matter"], ["lookt", "libya", "--", "started", "r2p", "save", "jihadist", "benghazi", "qaddafi"], ["well", "quickly", "morpher", "regime", "change", "violation", "un", "sc", "resolution"], ["acted", "outside", "law"], ["n't", "care", "us", "bound", "law", "even", "one", "passed", "congress"], ["regime", "change", "libya", "led", "muder", "us", "ambassador", "--", "anyone", "think", "happen", "end", "differently"], ["president", "lie", "us", "lied", "nsa", "lied", "us", "intentions", "libya"], ["another", "month", "bleeding", "dying", "syria", "remove", "assad", "install", "al", "nusra", "power", "--", "called", "fsa", "either", "defect", "al", "nusra", "buthchered"], ["disaster", "making", "us"]] | [["NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "RB"], ["NNP", "NNP", ":", "VBD", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP"], ["UH", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBD", "IN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NNP", "VBN", "NNP", "RB", "CD", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP", "VBD", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", ":", "NN", "VB", "VB", "VB", "RB"], ["NNP", "VB", "PRP", "VBN", "NNP", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "NNP"], ["DT", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", ":", "VBN", "NNP", "CC", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP"]] | intervention slippery slope full involvement stay far away syria possible matter. lookt libya -- started r2p save jihadist benghazi qaddafi. well quickly morpher regime change violation un sc resolution. acted outside law. n't care us bound law even one passed congress. regime change libya led muder us ambassador -- anyone think happen end differently. president lie us lied nsa lied us intentions libya. another month bleeding dying syria remove assad install al nusra power -- called fsa either defect al nusra buthchered. disaster making us | ["war"] | war | 1 | 0 |
Judyw | Any intervention is a slippery slope to full involvement which is why we should stay as far away from Syria as possible no matter what they do. Lookt at Libya -- we started out with R2P just to save those Jihadist in Benghazi from Qaddafi. Well it quickly morpher into regime change in violation of the UN SC resolution. So we acted outside the law. We didn't care we are the US - we are not bound by any LAW not even one passed in Congress. And regime change in Libya led to the muder of a US Ambassador -- does anyone think that what is about to happen will end any differently. The President will lie to us as we were lied to about NSA and lied to about US intentions in Libya. In another month we will be bleeding and dying in Syria to remove Assad and install Al Nusra in power -- the so called FSA will either defect to Al Nusra or be buthchered by them. This is a disaster in the making for the US. | us | A4038-P | syria | 1 | 3 | 2,936 | 9,832,599 | [["intervention", "slippery", "slope", "full", "involvement", "stay", "far", "away", "syria", "possible", "matter"], ["lookt", "libya", "--", "started", "r2p", "save", "jihadist", "benghazi", "qaddafi"], ["well", "quickly", "morpher", "regime", "change", "violation", "un", "sc", "resolution"], ["acted", "outside", "law"], ["n't", "care", "us", "bound", "law", "even", "one", "passed", "congress"], ["regime", "change", "libya", "led", "muder", "us", "ambassador", "--", "anyone", "think", "happen", "end", "differently"], ["president", "lie", "us", "lied", "nsa", "lied", "us", "intentions", "libya"], ["another", "month", "bleeding", "dying", "syria", "remove", "assad", "install", "al", "nusra", "power", "--", "called", "fsa", "either", "defect", "al", "nusra", "buthchered"], ["disaster", "making", "us"]] | [["NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "RB"], ["NNP", "NNP", ":", "VBD", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP"], ["UH", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBD", "IN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NNP", "VBN", "NNP", "RB", "CD", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP", "VBD", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", ":", "NN", "VB", "VB", "VB", "RB"], ["NNP", "VB", "PRP", "VBN", "NNP", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "NNP"], ["DT", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", ":", "VBN", "NNP", "CC", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP"]] | intervention slippery slope full involvement stay far away syria possible matter. lookt libya -- started r2p save jihadist benghazi qaddafi. well quickly morpher regime change violation un sc resolution. acted outside law. n't care us bound law even one passed congress. regime change libya led muder us ambassador -- anyone think happen end differently. president lie us lied nsa lied us intentions libya. another month bleeding dying syria remove assad install al nusra power -- called fsa either defect al nusra buthchered. disaster making us | ["syria"] | syria | 1 | 1 |
Judyw | Any intervention is a slippery slope to full involvement which is why we should stay as far away from Syria as possible no matter what they do. Lookt at Libya -- we started out with R2P just to save those Jihadist in Benghazi from Qaddafi. Well it quickly morpher into regime change in violation of the UN SC resolution. So we acted outside the law. We didn't care we are the US - we are not bound by any LAW not even one passed in Congress. And regime change in Libya led to the muder of a US Ambassador -- does anyone think that what is about to happen will end any differently. The President will lie to us as we were lied to about NSA and lied to about US intentions in Libya. In another month we will be bleeding and dying in Syria to remove Assad and install Al Nusra in power -- the so called FSA will either defect to Al Nusra or be buthchered by them. This is a disaster in the making for the US. | us | A4038-P | military intervention | 0 | 3 | 2,937 | 9,832,599 | [["intervention", "slippery", "slope", "full", "involvement", "stay", "far", "away", "syria", "possible", "matter"], ["lookt", "libya", "--", "started", "r2p", "save", "jihadist", "benghazi", "qaddafi"], ["well", "quickly", "morpher", "regime", "change", "violation", "un", "sc", "resolution"], ["acted", "outside", "law"], ["n't", "care", "us", "bound", "law", "even", "one", "passed", "congress"], ["regime", "change", "libya", "led", "muder", "us", "ambassador", "--", "anyone", "think", "happen", "end", "differently"], ["president", "lie", "us", "lied", "nsa", "lied", "us", "intentions", "libya"], ["another", "month", "bleeding", "dying", "syria", "remove", "assad", "install", "al", "nusra", "power", "--", "called", "fsa", "either", "defect", "al", "nusra", "buthchered"], ["disaster", "making", "us"]] | [["NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "RB"], ["NNP", "NNP", ":", "VBD", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP"], ["UH", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBD", "IN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NNP", "VBN", "NNP", "RB", "CD", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP", "VBD", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", ":", "NN", "VB", "VB", "VB", "RB"], ["NNP", "VB", "PRP", "VBN", "NNP", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "NNP"], ["DT", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", ":", "VBN", "NNP", "CC", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP"]] | intervention slippery slope full involvement stay far away syria possible matter. lookt libya -- started r2p save jihadist benghazi qaddafi. well quickly morpher regime change violation un sc resolution. acted outside law. n't care us bound law even one passed congress. regime change libya led muder us ambassador -- anyone think happen end differently. president lie us lied nsa lied us intentions libya. another month bleeding dying syria remove assad install al nusra power -- called fsa either defect al nusra buthchered. disaster making us | ["military", "intervention"] | military intervention | 1 | 0 |
Judyw | Any intervention is a slippery slope to full involvement which is why we should stay as far away from Syria as possible no matter what they do. Lookt at Libya -- we started out with R2P just to save those Jihadist in Benghazi from Qaddafi. Well it quickly morpher into regime change in violation of the UN SC resolution. So we acted outside the law. We didn't care we are the US - we are not bound by any LAW not even one passed in Congress. And regime change in Libya led to the muder of a US Ambassador -- does anyone think that what is about to happen will end any differently. The President will lie to us as we were lied to about NSA and lied to about US intentions in Libya. In another month we will be bleeding and dying in Syria to remove Assad and install Al Nusra in power -- the so called FSA will either defect to Al Nusra or be buthchered by them. This is a disaster in the making for the US. | syria | A4039-P | syria | 0 | 1 | 2,955 | 9,832,599 | [["intervention", "slippery", "slope", "full", "involvement", "stay", "far", "away", "syria", "possible", "matter"], ["lookt", "libya", "--", "started", "r2p", "save", "jihadist", "benghazi", "qaddafi"], ["well", "quickly", "morpher", "regime", "change", "violation", "un", "sc", "resolution"], ["acted", "outside", "law"], ["n't", "care", "us", "bound", "law", "even", "one", "passed", "congress"], ["regime", "change", "libya", "led", "muder", "us", "ambassador", "--", "anyone", "think", "happen", "end", "differently"], ["president", "lie", "us", "lied", "nsa", "lied", "us", "intentions", "libya"], ["another", "month", "bleeding", "dying", "syria", "remove", "assad", "install", "al", "nusra", "power", "--", "called", "fsa", "either", "defect", "al", "nusra", "buthchered"], ["disaster", "making", "us"]] | [["NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "RB"], ["NNP", "NNP", ":", "VBD", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP"], ["UH", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBD", "IN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NNP", "VBN", "NNP", "RB", "CD", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP", "VBD", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", ":", "NN", "VB", "VB", "VB", "RB"], ["NNP", "VB", "PRP", "VBN", "NNP", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "NNP"], ["DT", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", ":", "VBN", "NNP", "CC", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP"]] | intervention slippery slope full involvement stay far away syria possible matter. lookt libya -- started r2p save jihadist benghazi qaddafi. well quickly morpher regime change violation un sc resolution. acted outside law. n't care us bound law even one passed congress. regime change libya led muder us ambassador -- anyone think happen end differently. president lie us lied nsa lied us intentions libya. another month bleeding dying syria remove assad install al nusra power -- called fsa either defect al nusra buthchered. disaster making us | ["syria"] | syria | 1 | 1 |
Judyw | Any intervention is a slippery slope to full involvement which is why we should stay as far away from Syria as possible no matter what they do. Lookt at Libya -- we started out with R2P just to save those Jihadist in Benghazi from Qaddafi. Well it quickly morpher into regime change in violation of the UN SC resolution. So we acted outside the law. We didn't care we are the US - we are not bound by any LAW not even one passed in Congress. And regime change in Libya led to the muder of a US Ambassador -- does anyone think that what is about to happen will end any differently. The President will lie to us as we were lied to about NSA and lied to about US intentions in Libya. In another month we will be bleeding and dying in Syria to remove Assad and install Al Nusra in power -- the so called FSA will either defect to Al Nusra or be buthchered by them. This is a disaster in the making for the US. | syria | A4039-P | intervention | 0 | 3 | 2,956 | 9,832,599 | [["intervention", "slippery", "slope", "full", "involvement", "stay", "far", "away", "syria", "possible", "matter"], ["lookt", "libya", "--", "started", "r2p", "save", "jihadist", "benghazi", "qaddafi"], ["well", "quickly", "morpher", "regime", "change", "violation", "un", "sc", "resolution"], ["acted", "outside", "law"], ["n't", "care", "us", "bound", "law", "even", "one", "passed", "congress"], ["regime", "change", "libya", "led", "muder", "us", "ambassador", "--", "anyone", "think", "happen", "end", "differently"], ["president", "lie", "us", "lied", "nsa", "lied", "us", "intentions", "libya"], ["another", "month", "bleeding", "dying", "syria", "remove", "assad", "install", "al", "nusra", "power", "--", "called", "fsa", "either", "defect", "al", "nusra", "buthchered"], ["disaster", "making", "us"]] | [["NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "RB"], ["NNP", "NNP", ":", "VBD", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP"], ["UH", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBD", "IN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NNP", "VBN", "NNP", "RB", "CD", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP", "VBD", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", ":", "NN", "VB", "VB", "VB", "RB"], ["NNP", "VB", "PRP", "VBN", "NNP", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "NNP"], ["DT", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", ":", "VBN", "NNP", "CC", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP"]] | intervention slippery slope full involvement stay far away syria possible matter. lookt libya -- started r2p save jihadist benghazi qaddafi. well quickly morpher regime change violation un sc resolution. acted outside law. n't care us bound law even one passed congress. regime change libya led muder us ambassador -- anyone think happen end differently. president lie us lied nsa lied us intentions libya. another month bleeding dying syria remove assad install al nusra power -- called fsa either defect al nusra buthchered. disaster making us | ["intervention"] | intervention | 1 | 1 |
Judyw | Any intervention is a slippery slope to full involvement which is why we should stay as far away from Syria as possible no matter what they do. Lookt at Libya -- we started out with R2P just to save those Jihadist in Benghazi from Qaddafi. Well it quickly morpher into regime change in violation of the UN SC resolution. So we acted outside the law. We didn't care we are the US - we are not bound by any LAW not even one passed in Congress. And regime change in Libya led to the muder of a US Ambassador -- does anyone think that what is about to happen will end any differently. The President will lie to us as we were lied to about NSA and lied to about US intentions in Libya. In another month we will be bleeding and dying in Syria to remove Assad and install Al Nusra in power -- the so called FSA will either defect to Al Nusra or be buthchered by them. This is a disaster in the making for the US. | syria | A4039-P | intervention | 0 | 2 | 2,957 | 9,832,599 | [["intervention", "slippery", "slope", "full", "involvement", "stay", "far", "away", "syria", "possible", "matter"], ["lookt", "libya", "--", "started", "r2p", "save", "jihadist", "benghazi", "qaddafi"], ["well", "quickly", "morpher", "regime", "change", "violation", "un", "sc", "resolution"], ["acted", "outside", "law"], ["n't", "care", "us", "bound", "law", "even", "one", "passed", "congress"], ["regime", "change", "libya", "led", "muder", "us", "ambassador", "--", "anyone", "think", "happen", "end", "differently"], ["president", "lie", "us", "lied", "nsa", "lied", "us", "intentions", "libya"], ["another", "month", "bleeding", "dying", "syria", "remove", "assad", "install", "al", "nusra", "power", "--", "called", "fsa", "either", "defect", "al", "nusra", "buthchered"], ["disaster", "making", "us"]] | [["NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "RB"], ["NNP", "NNP", ":", "VBD", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP"], ["UH", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBD", "IN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NNP", "VBN", "NNP", "RB", "CD", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP", "VBD", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", ":", "NN", "VB", "VB", "VB", "RB"], ["NNP", "VB", "PRP", "VBN", "NNP", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "NNP"], ["DT", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", ":", "VBN", "NNP", "CC", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP"]] | intervention slippery slope full involvement stay far away syria possible matter. lookt libya -- started r2p save jihadist benghazi qaddafi. well quickly morpher regime change violation un sc resolution. acted outside law. n't care us bound law even one passed congress. regime change libya led muder us ambassador -- anyone think happen end differently. president lie us lied nsa lied us intentions libya. another month bleeding dying syria remove assad install al nusra power -- called fsa either defect al nusra buthchered. disaster making us | ["intervention"] | intervention | 1 | 1 |
Judyw | Any intervention is a slippery slope to full involvement which is why we should stay as far away from Syria as possible no matter what they do. Lookt at Libya -- we started out with R2P just to save those Jihadist in Benghazi from Qaddafi. Well it quickly morpher into regime change in violation of the UN SC resolution. So we acted outside the law. We didn't care we are the US - we are not bound by any LAW not even one passed in Congress. And regime change in Libya led to the muder of a US Ambassador -- does anyone think that what is about to happen will end any differently. The President will lie to us as we were lied to about NSA and lied to about US intentions in Libya. In another month we will be bleeding and dying in Syria to remove Assad and install Al Nusra in power -- the so called FSA will either defect to Al Nusra or be buthchered by them. This is a disaster in the making for the US. | syria | A4039-P | u | 0 | 3 | 2,958 | 9,832,599 | [["intervention", "slippery", "slope", "full", "involvement", "stay", "far", "away", "syria", "possible", "matter"], ["lookt", "libya", "--", "started", "r2p", "save", "jihadist", "benghazi", "qaddafi"], ["well", "quickly", "morpher", "regime", "change", "violation", "un", "sc", "resolution"], ["acted", "outside", "law"], ["n't", "care", "us", "bound", "law", "even", "one", "passed", "congress"], ["regime", "change", "libya", "led", "muder", "us", "ambassador", "--", "anyone", "think", "happen", "end", "differently"], ["president", "lie", "us", "lied", "nsa", "lied", "us", "intentions", "libya"], ["another", "month", "bleeding", "dying", "syria", "remove", "assad", "install", "al", "nusra", "power", "--", "called", "fsa", "either", "defect", "al", "nusra", "buthchered"], ["disaster", "making", "us"]] | [["NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "RB"], ["NNP", "NNP", ":", "VBD", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP"], ["UH", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBD", "IN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NNP", "VBN", "NNP", "RB", "CD", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP", "VBD", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", ":", "NN", "VB", "VB", "VB", "RB"], ["NNP", "VB", "PRP", "VBN", "NNP", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "NNP"], ["DT", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", ":", "VBN", "NNP", "CC", "VB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NNP"]] | intervention slippery slope full involvement stay far away syria possible matter. lookt libya -- started r2p save jihadist benghazi qaddafi. well quickly morpher regime change violation un sc resolution. acted outside law. n't care us bound law even one passed congress. regime change libya led muder us ambassador -- anyone think happen end differently. president lie us lied nsa lied us intentions libya. another month bleeding dying syria remove assad install al nusra power -- called fsa either defect al nusra buthchered. disaster making us | ["u"] | u | 1 | 1 |
AAC | Higher education is not just a steppingstone to a well-paying job; it is conducive to a more meaningful and fulfilling life, with benefits that go far beyond the economic. A ratings system whose metrics all have dollar signs in front of them is pernicious and should be avoided at all cost. | grade colleges | A3708-P | grade colleges | 0 | 1 | 4,552 | 11,896,983 | [["higher", "education", "steppingstone", "well", "paying", "job", "conducive", "meaningful", "fulfilling", "life", "benefits", "go", "far", "beyond", "economic"], ["ratings", "system", "whose", "metrics", "dollar", "signs", "front", "pernicious", "avoided", "cost"]] | [["JJR", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "IN", "JJ"], ["NNS", "NN", "WP$", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "VBN", "NN"]] | higher education steppingstone well paying job conducive meaningful fulfilling life benefits go far beyond economic. ratings system whose metrics dollar signs front pernicious avoided cost | ["grade", "college"] | grade college | 1 | 0 |
AAC | Higher education is not just a steppingstone to a well-paying job; it is conducive to a more meaningful and fulfilling life, with benefits that go far beyond the economic. A ratings system whose metrics all have dollar signs in front of them is pernicious and should be avoided at all cost. | grade colleges | A3708-P | higher education | 0 | 3 | 4,553 | 11,896,983 | [["higher", "education", "steppingstone", "well", "paying", "job", "conducive", "meaningful", "fulfilling", "life", "benefits", "go", "far", "beyond", "economic"], ["ratings", "system", "whose", "metrics", "dollar", "signs", "front", "pernicious", "avoided", "cost"]] | [["JJR", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "IN", "JJ"], ["NNS", "NN", "WP$", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "VBN", "NN"]] | higher education steppingstone well paying job conducive meaningful fulfilling life benefits go far beyond economic. ratings system whose metrics dollar signs front pernicious avoided cost | ["higher", "education"] | higher education | 1 | 1 |
AAC | Higher education is not just a steppingstone to a well-paying job; it is conducive to a more meaningful and fulfilling life, with benefits that go far beyond the economic. A ratings system whose metrics all have dollar signs in front of them is pernicious and should be avoided at all cost. | grade colleges | A3708-P | higher education for a well rounded life not just economic | 1 | 2 | 4,554 | 11,896,983 | [["higher", "education", "steppingstone", "well", "paying", "job", "conducive", "meaningful", "fulfilling", "life", "benefits", "go", "far", "beyond", "economic"], ["ratings", "system", "whose", "metrics", "dollar", "signs", "front", "pernicious", "avoided", "cost"]] | [["JJR", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "IN", "JJ"], ["NNS", "NN", "WP$", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "VBN", "NN"]] | higher education steppingstone well paying job conducive meaningful fulfilling life benefits go far beyond economic. ratings system whose metrics dollar signs front pernicious avoided cost | ["higher", "education", "well", "rounded", "life", "economic"] | higher education well rounded life economic | 1 | 0 |
AAC | Higher education is not just a steppingstone to a well-paying job; it is conducive to a more meaningful and fulfilling life, with benefits that go far beyond the economic. A ratings system whose metrics all have dollar signs in front of them is pernicious and should be avoided at all cost. | grade colleges | A3708-P | higher education | 1 | 3 | 4,555 | 11,896,983 | [["higher", "education", "steppingstone", "well", "paying", "job", "conducive", "meaningful", "fulfilling", "life", "benefits", "go", "far", "beyond", "economic"], ["ratings", "system", "whose", "metrics", "dollar", "signs", "front", "pernicious", "avoided", "cost"]] | [["JJR", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "IN", "JJ"], ["NNS", "NN", "WP$", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "VBN", "NN"]] | higher education steppingstone well paying job conducive meaningful fulfilling life benefits go far beyond economic. ratings system whose metrics dollar signs front pernicious avoided cost | ["higher", "education"] | higher education | 1 | 1 |
Conlon | What about all of the rich criminals who are able to use their wealth & influence to keep from being arrested in the first place? If Wall Street con men are still able to vote after crashing the economy, oil company executives are still able to vote after polluting the planet, and lobbyists are still able to vote after bribing our politicians, then it seems only fair that poor people arrested for theft or using drugs should be able to vote, too. | felons | A4987-P | felons | 1 | 1 | 802 | 18,303,130 | [["rich", "criminals", "able", "use", "wealth", "influence", "keep", "arrested", "first", "place"], ["wall", "street", "con", "men", "still", "able", "vote", "crashing", "economy", "oil", "company", "executives", "still", "able", "vote", "polluting", "planet", "lobbyists", "still", "able", "vote", "bribing", "politicians", "seems", "fair", "poor", "people", "arrested", "theft", "using", "drugs", "able", "vote"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "VB"]] | rich criminals able use wealth influence keep arrested first place. wall street con men still able vote crashing economy oil company executives still able vote polluting planet lobbyists still able vote bribing politicians seems fair poor people arrested theft using drugs able vote | ["felon"] | felon | 1 | 0 |
Conlon | What about all of the rich criminals who are able to use their wealth & influence to keep from being arrested in the first place? If Wall Street con men are still able to vote after crashing the economy, oil company executives are still able to vote after polluting the planet, and lobbyists are still able to vote after bribing our politicians, then it seems only fair that poor people arrested for theft or using drugs should be able to vote, too. | felons | A4987-P | voting rights | 1 | 3 | 803 | 18,303,130 | [["rich", "criminals", "able", "use", "wealth", "influence", "keep", "arrested", "first", "place"], ["wall", "street", "con", "men", "still", "able", "vote", "crashing", "economy", "oil", "company", "executives", "still", "able", "vote", "polluting", "planet", "lobbyists", "still", "able", "vote", "bribing", "politicians", "seems", "fair", "poor", "people", "arrested", "theft", "using", "drugs", "able", "vote"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "VB"]] | rich criminals able use wealth influence keep arrested first place. wall street con men still able vote crashing economy oil company executives still able vote polluting planet lobbyists still able vote bribing politicians seems fair poor people arrested theft using drugs able vote | ["voting", "right"] | voting right | 1 | 0 |
Conlon | What about all of the rich criminals who are able to use their wealth & influence to keep from being arrested in the first place? If Wall Street con men are still able to vote after crashing the economy, oil company executives are still able to vote after polluting the planet, and lobbyists are still able to vote after bribing our politicians, then it seems only fair that poor people arrested for theft or using drugs should be able to vote, too. | felons | A4987-P | voting rights | 1 | 2 | 804 | 18,303,130 | [["rich", "criminals", "able", "use", "wealth", "influence", "keep", "arrested", "first", "place"], ["wall", "street", "con", "men", "still", "able", "vote", "crashing", "economy", "oil", "company", "executives", "still", "able", "vote", "polluting", "planet", "lobbyists", "still", "able", "vote", "bribing", "politicians", "seems", "fair", "poor", "people", "arrested", "theft", "using", "drugs", "able", "vote"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "VB"]] | rich criminals able use wealth influence keep arrested first place. wall street con men still able vote crashing economy oil company executives still able vote polluting planet lobbyists still able vote bribing politicians seems fair poor people arrested theft using drugs able vote | ["voting", "right"] | voting right | 1 | 0 |
Conlon | What about all of the rich criminals who are able to use their wealth & influence to keep from being arrested in the first place? If Wall Street con men are still able to vote after crashing the economy, oil company executives are still able to vote after polluting the planet, and lobbyists are still able to vote after bribing our politicians, then it seems only fair that poor people arrested for theft or using drugs should be able to vote, too. | felons | A4987-P | injustice | 1 | 3 | 805 | 18,303,130 | [["rich", "criminals", "able", "use", "wealth", "influence", "keep", "arrested", "first", "place"], ["wall", "street", "con", "men", "still", "able", "vote", "crashing", "economy", "oil", "company", "executives", "still", "able", "vote", "polluting", "planet", "lobbyists", "still", "able", "vote", "bribing", "politicians", "seems", "fair", "poor", "people", "arrested", "theft", "using", "drugs", "able", "vote"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "VB"]] | rich criminals able use wealth influence keep arrested first place. wall street con men still able vote crashing economy oil company executives still able vote polluting planet lobbyists still able vote bribing politicians seems fair poor people arrested theft using drugs able vote | ["injustice"] | injustice | 1 | 0 |
Scott Gigolu | Rasmussen didn't actually conclude that 20% of Americans are idiots, but its new poll on internet poker demonstrates the fact quite clearly. Responding to polling questions on gambling, 61% of Americans believed that people ought to be allowed to play poker or other games at home for money, but when asked if people ought to be allowed to play poker or other games for money on the internet, only 41% said yes. OK. So there is our 20% What sort of blithering idiot thinks, "well, yeah, playing live poker at home is ok, but playing internet poker is not?" | people | A1823-P | people | 0 | 1 | 5,864 | 5,613,723 | [["rasmussen", "n't", "actually", "conclude", "20", "americans", "idiots", "new", "poll", "internet", "poker", "demonstrates", "fact", "quite", "clearly"], ["responding", "polling", "questions", "gambling", "61", "americans", "believed", "people", "ought", "allowed", "play", "poker", "games", "home", "money", "asked", "people", "ought", "allowed", "play", "poker", "games", "money", "internet", "41", "said", "yes"], ["ok"], ["20", "sort", "blithering", "idiot", "thinks", "well", "yeah", "playing", "live", "poker", "home", "ok", "playing", "internet", "poker"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "CD", "NNPS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "RB", "RB"], ["VBG", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "CD", "NNPS", "VBD", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "CD", "VBD", "UH"], ["UH"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "UH", "UH", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBG", "NN", "NN"]] | rasmussen n't actually conclude 20 americans idiots new poll internet poker demonstrates fact quite clearly. responding polling questions gambling 61 americans believed people ought allowed play poker games home money asked people ought allowed play poker games money internet 41 said yes. ok. 20 sort blithering idiot thinks well yeah playing live poker home ok playing internet poker | ["people"] | people | 1 | 1 |
Scott Gigolu | Rasmussen didn't actually conclude that 20% of Americans are idiots, but its new poll on internet poker demonstrates the fact quite clearly. Responding to polling questions on gambling, 61% of Americans believed that people ought to be allowed to play poker or other games at home for money, but when asked if people ought to be allowed to play poker or other games for money on the internet, only 41% said yes. OK. So there is our 20% What sort of blithering idiot thinks, "well, yeah, playing live poker at home is ok, but playing internet poker is not?" | people | A1823-P | legal gambling | 0 | 3 | 5,865 | 5,613,723 | [["rasmussen", "n't", "actually", "conclude", "20", "americans", "idiots", "new", "poll", "internet", "poker", "demonstrates", "fact", "quite", "clearly"], ["responding", "polling", "questions", "gambling", "61", "americans", "believed", "people", "ought", "allowed", "play", "poker", "games", "home", "money", "asked", "people", "ought", "allowed", "play", "poker", "games", "money", "internet", "41", "said", "yes"], ["ok"], ["20", "sort", "blithering", "idiot", "thinks", "well", "yeah", "playing", "live", "poker", "home", "ok", "playing", "internet", "poker"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "CD", "NNPS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "RB", "RB"], ["VBG", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "CD", "NNPS", "VBD", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "CD", "VBD", "UH"], ["UH"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "UH", "UH", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBG", "NN", "NN"]] | rasmussen n't actually conclude 20 americans idiots new poll internet poker demonstrates fact quite clearly. responding polling questions gambling 61 americans believed people ought allowed play poker games home money asked people ought allowed play poker games money internet 41 said yes. ok. 20 sort blithering idiot thinks well yeah playing live poker home ok playing internet poker | ["legal", "gambling"] | legal gambling | 1 | 0 |
Scott Gigolu | Rasmussen didn't actually conclude that 20% of Americans are idiots, but its new poll on internet poker demonstrates the fact quite clearly. Responding to polling questions on gambling, 61% of Americans believed that people ought to be allowed to play poker or other games at home for money, but when asked if people ought to be allowed to play poker or other games for money on the internet, only 41% said yes. OK. So there is our 20% What sort of blithering idiot thinks, "well, yeah, playing live poker at home is ok, but playing internet poker is not?" | people | A1823-P | internet gambling | 0 | 3 | 5,866 | 5,613,723 | [["rasmussen", "n't", "actually", "conclude", "20", "americans", "idiots", "new", "poll", "internet", "poker", "demonstrates", "fact", "quite", "clearly"], ["responding", "polling", "questions", "gambling", "61", "americans", "believed", "people", "ought", "allowed", "play", "poker", "games", "home", "money", "asked", "people", "ought", "allowed", "play", "poker", "games", "money", "internet", "41", "said", "yes"], ["ok"], ["20", "sort", "blithering", "idiot", "thinks", "well", "yeah", "playing", "live", "poker", "home", "ok", "playing", "internet", "poker"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "CD", "NNPS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "RB", "RB"], ["VBG", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "CD", "NNPS", "VBD", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "CD", "VBD", "UH"], ["UH"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "UH", "UH", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBG", "NN", "NN"]] | rasmussen n't actually conclude 20 americans idiots new poll internet poker demonstrates fact quite clearly. responding polling questions gambling 61 americans believed people ought allowed play poker games home money asked people ought allowed play poker games money internet 41 said yes. ok. 20 sort blithering idiot thinks well yeah playing live poker home ok playing internet poker | ["internet", "gambling"] | internet gambling | 1 | 0 |
Scott Gigolu | Rasmussen didn't actually conclude that 20% of Americans are idiots, but its new poll on internet poker demonstrates the fact quite clearly. Responding to polling questions on gambling, 61% of Americans believed that people ought to be allowed to play poker or other games at home for money, but when asked if people ought to be allowed to play poker or other games for money on the internet, only 41% said yes. OK. So there is our 20% What sort of blithering idiot thinks, "well, yeah, playing live poker at home is ok, but playing internet poker is not?" | people | A1823-P | internet poker | 1 | 2 | 5,867 | 5,613,723 | [["rasmussen", "n't", "actually", "conclude", "20", "americans", "idiots", "new", "poll", "internet", "poker", "demonstrates", "fact", "quite", "clearly"], ["responding", "polling", "questions", "gambling", "61", "americans", "believed", "people", "ought", "allowed", "play", "poker", "games", "home", "money", "asked", "people", "ought", "allowed", "play", "poker", "games", "money", "internet", "41", "said", "yes"], ["ok"], ["20", "sort", "blithering", "idiot", "thinks", "well", "yeah", "playing", "live", "poker", "home", "ok", "playing", "internet", "poker"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "CD", "NNPS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "RB", "RB"], ["VBG", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "CD", "NNPS", "VBD", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "CD", "VBD", "UH"], ["UH"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "UH", "UH", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBG", "NN", "NN"]] | rasmussen n't actually conclude 20 americans idiots new poll internet poker demonstrates fact quite clearly. responding polling questions gambling 61 americans believed people ought allowed play poker games home money asked people ought allowed play poker games money internet 41 said yes. ok. 20 sort blithering idiot thinks well yeah playing live poker home ok playing internet poker | ["internet", "poker"] | internet poker | 1 | 1 |
Scott Gigolu | Rasmussen didn't actually conclude that 20% of Americans are idiots, but its new poll on internet poker demonstrates the fact quite clearly. Responding to polling questions on gambling, 61% of Americans believed that people ought to be allowed to play poker or other games at home for money, but when asked if people ought to be allowed to play poker or other games for money on the internet, only 41% said yes. OK. So there is our 20% What sort of blithering idiot thinks, "well, yeah, playing live poker at home is ok, but playing internet poker is not?" | people | A1823-P | gamble | 1 | 3 | 5,868 | 5,613,723 | [["rasmussen", "n't", "actually", "conclude", "20", "americans", "idiots", "new", "poll", "internet", "poker", "demonstrates", "fact", "quite", "clearly"], ["responding", "polling", "questions", "gambling", "61", "americans", "believed", "people", "ought", "allowed", "play", "poker", "games", "home", "money", "asked", "people", "ought", "allowed", "play", "poker", "games", "money", "internet", "41", "said", "yes"], ["ok"], ["20", "sort", "blithering", "idiot", "thinks", "well", "yeah", "playing", "live", "poker", "home", "ok", "playing", "internet", "poker"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "CD", "NNPS", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "RB", "RB"], ["VBG", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "CD", "NNPS", "VBD", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "CD", "VBD", "UH"], ["UH"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "UH", "UH", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBG", "NN", "NN"]] | rasmussen n't actually conclude 20 americans idiots new poll internet poker demonstrates fact quite clearly. responding polling questions gambling 61 americans believed people ought allowed play poker games home money asked people ought allowed play poker games money internet 41 said yes. ok. 20 sort blithering idiot thinks well yeah playing live poker home ok playing internet poker | ["gamble"] | gamble | 1 | 0 |
Peter | With this logic, taxing wages discourages work, so perhaps we should get rid of all payroll taxes. This line of thought is ridiculous. Taxation is but a bump in the road to those bent on earning millions, a price of doing business. No one would pass on making a wise investment because of taxes, just as no one with a good business plan would not start a business because of high taxation. Getting rid of taxes on capital gains just makes those with investment that much richer, and our society that much poorer. | capital gains | A2268-P | capital gains | 0 | 1 | 10,855 | 6,891,675 | [["logic", "taxing", "wages", "discourages", "work", "perhaps", "get", "rid", "payroll", "taxes"], ["line", "thought", "ridiculous"], ["taxation", "bump", "road", "bent", "earning", "millions", "price", "business"], ["one", "would", "pass", "making", "wise", "investment", "taxes", "one", "good", "business", "plan", "would", "start", "business", "high", "taxation"], ["getting", "rid", "taxes", "capital", "gains", "makes", "investment", "much", "richer", "society", "much", "poorer"]] | [["NN", "VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "RB", "VB", "VBN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "JJ"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBG", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "MD", "VB", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBG", "VBN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "RB", "JJR", "NN", "RB", "JJR"]] | logic taxing wages discourages work perhaps get rid payroll taxes. line thought ridiculous. taxation bump road bent earning millions price business. one would pass making wise investment taxes one good business plan would start business high taxation. getting rid taxes capital gains makes investment much richer society much poorer | ["capital", "gain"] | capital gain | 1 | 1 |
Peter | With this logic, taxing wages discourages work, so perhaps we should get rid of all payroll taxes. This line of thought is ridiculous. Taxation is but a bump in the road to those bent on earning millions, a price of doing business. No one would pass on making a wise investment because of taxes, just as no one with a good business plan would not start a business because of high taxation. Getting rid of taxes on capital gains just makes those with investment that much richer, and our society that much poorer. | capital gains | A2268-P | tax | 0 | 3 | 10,856 | 6,891,675 | [["logic", "taxing", "wages", "discourages", "work", "perhaps", "get", "rid", "payroll", "taxes"], ["line", "thought", "ridiculous"], ["taxation", "bump", "road", "bent", "earning", "millions", "price", "business"], ["one", "would", "pass", "making", "wise", "investment", "taxes", "one", "good", "business", "plan", "would", "start", "business", "high", "taxation"], ["getting", "rid", "taxes", "capital", "gains", "makes", "investment", "much", "richer", "society", "much", "poorer"]] | [["NN", "VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "RB", "VB", "VBN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "JJ"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBG", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "MD", "VB", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBG", "VBN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "RB", "JJR", "NN", "RB", "JJR"]] | logic taxing wages discourages work perhaps get rid payroll taxes. line thought ridiculous. taxation bump road bent earning millions price business. one would pass making wise investment taxes one good business plan would start business high taxation. getting rid taxes capital gains makes investment much richer society much poorer | ["tax"] | tax | 1 | 1 |
marian | I have very very happy memories of family vacations with the kids- and would not change those for the world. Perhaps the difference is the kids were well behaved? From looking at these posts, it seems alot of parents are extremely anxious to get away from their children. I think getting away for a romantic weekend sans children is great- but for big 2 week summer vacations, I would find it unthinkable to go without the children and to have them miss this experience. I would think this sends a message to the kids that you really don't like them very much- perhaps theyre right. | parents | A3242-P | parents | 1 | 1 | 6,078 | 6,539,424 | [["happy", "memories", "family", "vacations", "kids-", "would", "change", "world"], ["perhaps", "difference", "kids", "well", "behaved"], ["looking", "posts", "seems", "alot", "parents", "extremely", "anxious", "get", "away", "children"], ["think", "getting", "away", "romantic", "weekend", "sans", "children", "great-", "big", "2", "week", "summer", "vacations", "would", "find", "unthinkable", "go", "without", "children", "miss", "experience"], ["would", "think", "sends", "message", "kids", "really", "n't", "like", "much-", "perhaps", "right"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "MD", "VB", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBN"], ["VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "NNS"], ["VBP", "VBG", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "VB", "IN", "NNS", "VB", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "VB", "IN", "RB", "JJ"]] | happy memories family vacations kids- would change world. perhaps difference kids well behaved. looking posts seems alot parents extremely anxious get away children. think getting away romantic weekend sans children great- big 2 week summer vacations would find unthinkable go without children miss experience. would think sends message kids really n't like much- perhaps right | ["parent"] | parent | 1 | 1 |
marian | I have very very happy memories of family vacations with the kids- and would not change those for the world. Perhaps the difference is the kids were well behaved? From looking at these posts, it seems alot of parents are extremely anxious to get away from their children. I think getting away for a romantic weekend sans children is great- but for big 2 week summer vacations, I would find it unthinkable to go without the children and to have them miss this experience. I would think this sends a message to the kids that you really don't like them very much- perhaps theyre right. | parents | A3242-P | memory | 1 | 3 | 6,079 | 6,539,424 | [["happy", "memories", "family", "vacations", "kids-", "would", "change", "world"], ["perhaps", "difference", "kids", "well", "behaved"], ["looking", "posts", "seems", "alot", "parents", "extremely", "anxious", "get", "away", "children"], ["think", "getting", "away", "romantic", "weekend", "sans", "children", "great-", "big", "2", "week", "summer", "vacations", "would", "find", "unthinkable", "go", "without", "children", "miss", "experience"], ["would", "think", "sends", "message", "kids", "really", "n't", "like", "much-", "perhaps", "right"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "MD", "VB", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBN"], ["VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "NNS"], ["VBP", "VBG", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "VB", "IN", "NNS", "VB", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "VB", "IN", "RB", "JJ"]] | happy memories family vacations kids- would change world. perhaps difference kids well behaved. looking posts seems alot parents extremely anxious get away children. think getting away romantic weekend sans children great- big 2 week summer vacations would find unthinkable go without children miss experience. would think sends message kids really n't like much- perhaps right | ["memory"] | memory | 1 | 0 |
marian | I have very very happy memories of family vacations with the kids- and would not change those for the world. Perhaps the difference is the kids were well behaved? From looking at these posts, it seems alot of parents are extremely anxious to get away from their children. I think getting away for a romantic weekend sans children is great- but for big 2 week summer vacations, I would find it unthinkable to go without the children and to have them miss this experience. I would think this sends a message to the kids that you really don't like them very much- perhaps theyre right. | parents | A3242-P | family vacations | 1 | 3 | 6,080 | 6,539,424 | [["happy", "memories", "family", "vacations", "kids-", "would", "change", "world"], ["perhaps", "difference", "kids", "well", "behaved"], ["looking", "posts", "seems", "alot", "parents", "extremely", "anxious", "get", "away", "children"], ["think", "getting", "away", "romantic", "weekend", "sans", "children", "great-", "big", "2", "week", "summer", "vacations", "would", "find", "unthinkable", "go", "without", "children", "miss", "experience"], ["would", "think", "sends", "message", "kids", "really", "n't", "like", "much-", "perhaps", "right"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "MD", "VB", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBN"], ["VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "NNS"], ["VBP", "VBG", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "VB", "IN", "NNS", "VB", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "VB", "IN", "RB", "JJ"]] | happy memories family vacations kids- would change world. perhaps difference kids well behaved. looking posts seems alot parents extremely anxious get away children. think getting away romantic weekend sans children great- big 2 week summer vacations would find unthinkable go without children miss experience. would think sends message kids really n't like much- perhaps right | ["family", "vacation"] | family vacation | 1 | 1 |
marian | I have very very happy memories of family vacations with the kids- and would not change those for the world. Perhaps the difference is the kids were well behaved? From looking at these posts, it seems alot of parents are extremely anxious to get away from their children. I think getting away for a romantic weekend sans children is great- but for big 2 week summer vacations, I would find it unthinkable to go without the children and to have them miss this experience. I would think this sends a message to the kids that you really don't like them very much- perhaps theyre right. | vacation | A3243-P | vacation | 1 | 1 | 17,026 | 6,539,424 | [["happy", "memories", "family", "vacations", "kids-", "would", "change", "world"], ["perhaps", "difference", "kids", "well", "behaved"], ["looking", "posts", "seems", "alot", "parents", "extremely", "anxious", "get", "away", "children"], ["think", "getting", "away", "romantic", "weekend", "sans", "children", "great-", "big", "2", "week", "summer", "vacations", "would", "find", "unthinkable", "go", "without", "children", "miss", "experience"], ["would", "think", "sends", "message", "kids", "really", "n't", "like", "much-", "perhaps", "right"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "MD", "VB", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBN"], ["VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "NNS"], ["VBP", "VBG", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "VB", "IN", "NNS", "VB", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "VB", "IN", "RB", "JJ"]] | happy memories family vacations kids- would change world. perhaps difference kids well behaved. looking posts seems alot parents extremely anxious get away children. think getting away romantic weekend sans children great- big 2 week summer vacations would find unthinkable go without children miss experience. would think sends message kids really n't like much- perhaps right | ["vacation"] | vacation | 1 | 1 |
marian | I have very very happy memories of family vacations with the kids- and would not change those for the world. Perhaps the difference is the kids were well behaved? From looking at these posts, it seems alot of parents are extremely anxious to get away from their children. I think getting away for a romantic weekend sans children is great- but for big 2 week summer vacations, I would find it unthinkable to go without the children and to have them miss this experience. I would think this sends a message to the kids that you really don't like them very much- perhaps theyre right. | vacation | A3243-P | family vacations | 1 | 3 | 17,027 | 6,539,424 | [["happy", "memories", "family", "vacations", "kids-", "would", "change", "world"], ["perhaps", "difference", "kids", "well", "behaved"], ["looking", "posts", "seems", "alot", "parents", "extremely", "anxious", "get", "away", "children"], ["think", "getting", "away", "romantic", "weekend", "sans", "children", "great-", "big", "2", "week", "summer", "vacations", "would", "find", "unthinkable", "go", "without", "children", "miss", "experience"], ["would", "think", "sends", "message", "kids", "really", "n't", "like", "much-", "perhaps", "right"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "MD", "VB", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBN"], ["VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "NNS"], ["VBP", "VBG", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "VB", "IN", "NNS", "VB", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "VB", "IN", "RB", "JJ"]] | happy memories family vacations kids- would change world. perhaps difference kids well behaved. looking posts seems alot parents extremely anxious get away children. think getting away romantic weekend sans children great- big 2 week summer vacations would find unthinkable go without children miss experience. would think sends message kids really n't like much- perhaps right | ["family", "vacation"] | family vacation | 1 | 1 |
marian | I have very very happy memories of family vacations with the kids- and would not change those for the world. Perhaps the difference is the kids were well behaved? From looking at these posts, it seems alot of parents are extremely anxious to get away from their children. I think getting away for a romantic weekend sans children is great- but for big 2 week summer vacations, I would find it unthinkable to go without the children and to have them miss this experience. I would think this sends a message to the kids that you really don't like them very much- perhaps theyre right. | vacation | A3243-P | vacation | 1 | 3 | 17,028 | 6,539,424 | [["happy", "memories", "family", "vacations", "kids-", "would", "change", "world"], ["perhaps", "difference", "kids", "well", "behaved"], ["looking", "posts", "seems", "alot", "parents", "extremely", "anxious", "get", "away", "children"], ["think", "getting", "away", "romantic", "weekend", "sans", "children", "great-", "big", "2", "week", "summer", "vacations", "would", "find", "unthinkable", "go", "without", "children", "miss", "experience"], ["would", "think", "sends", "message", "kids", "really", "n't", "like", "much-", "perhaps", "right"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "MD", "VB", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBN"], ["VBG", "NNS", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "NNS"], ["VBP", "VBG", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "VB", "IN", "NNS", "VB", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "VB", "IN", "RB", "JJ"]] | happy memories family vacations kids- would change world. perhaps difference kids well behaved. looking posts seems alot parents extremely anxious get away children. think getting away romantic weekend sans children great- big 2 week summer vacations would find unthinkable go without children miss experience. would think sends message kids really n't like much- perhaps right | ["vacation"] | vacation | 1 | 1 |
Schulz | Patients should also have to undergo mandatory training. I have used opioids for 12 years and I have not increased that amount in all that time because I studied up on pain medication and addiction. Not one doctor over that time told me one thing that I learned in my own. I know more than most doctors. Doctors are passing out pills they don't understand and their patients have even a less understanding how to use them. No wonder why there is a big problem. | opioid training | A4217-P | opioid training | 1 | 1 | 9,939 | 18,434,209 | [["patients", "also", "undergo", "mandatory", "training"], ["used", "opioids", "12", "years", "increased", "amount", "time", "studied", "pain", "medication", "addiction"], ["one", "doctor", "time", "told", "one", "thing", "learned"], ["know", "doctors"], ["doctors", "passing", "pills", "n't", "understand", "patients", "even", "less", "understanding", "use"], ["wonder", "big", "problem"]] | [["NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBN", "NNS", "CD", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "CD", "NN", "VBD"], ["VBP", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "RBR", "NN", "VB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN"]] | patients also undergo mandatory training. used opioids 12 years increased amount time studied pain medication addiction. one doctor time told one thing learned. know doctors. doctors passing pills n't understand patients even less understanding use. wonder big problem | ["opioid", "training"] | opioid training | 1 | 0 |
Schulz | Patients should also have to undergo mandatory training. I have used opioids for 12 years and I have not increased that amount in all that time because I studied up on pain medication and addiction. Not one doctor over that time told me one thing that I learned in my own. I know more than most doctors. Doctors are passing out pills they don't understand and their patients have even a less understanding how to use them. No wonder why there is a big problem. | opioid training | A4217-P | patient education | 1 | 3 | 9,940 | 18,434,209 | [["patients", "also", "undergo", "mandatory", "training"], ["used", "opioids", "12", "years", "increased", "amount", "time", "studied", "pain", "medication", "addiction"], ["one", "doctor", "time", "told", "one", "thing", "learned"], ["know", "doctors"], ["doctors", "passing", "pills", "n't", "understand", "patients", "even", "less", "understanding", "use"], ["wonder", "big", "problem"]] | [["NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBN", "NNS", "CD", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "CD", "NN", "VBD"], ["VBP", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "RBR", "NN", "VB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN"]] | patients also undergo mandatory training. used opioids 12 years increased amount time studied pain medication addiction. one doctor time told one thing learned. know doctors. doctors passing pills n't understand patients even less understanding use. wonder big problem | ["patient", "education"] | patient education | 1 | 0 |
Schulz | Patients should also have to undergo mandatory training. I have used opioids for 12 years and I have not increased that amount in all that time because I studied up on pain medication and addiction. Not one doctor over that time told me one thing that I learned in my own. I know more than most doctors. Doctors are passing out pills they don't understand and their patients have even a less understanding how to use them. No wonder why there is a big problem. | opioid training | A4217-P | opioids | 1 | 3 | 9,941 | 18,434,209 | [["patients", "also", "undergo", "mandatory", "training"], ["used", "opioids", "12", "years", "increased", "amount", "time", "studied", "pain", "medication", "addiction"], ["one", "doctor", "time", "told", "one", "thing", "learned"], ["know", "doctors"], ["doctors", "passing", "pills", "n't", "understand", "patients", "even", "less", "understanding", "use"], ["wonder", "big", "problem"]] | [["NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBN", "NNS", "CD", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "CD", "NN", "VBD"], ["VBP", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "RBR", "NN", "VB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN"]] | patients also undergo mandatory training. used opioids 12 years increased amount time studied pain medication addiction. one doctor time told one thing learned. know doctors. doctors passing pills n't understand patients even less understanding use. wonder big problem | ["opioids"] | opioids | 1 | 1 |
Schulz | Patients should also have to undergo mandatory training. I have used opioids for 12 years and I have not increased that amount in all that time because I studied up on pain medication and addiction. Not one doctor over that time told me one thing that I learned in my own. I know more than most doctors. Doctors are passing out pills they don't understand and their patients have even a less understanding how to use them. No wonder why there is a big problem. | opioid training | A4217-P | pain medication | 1 | 3 | 9,942 | 18,434,209 | [["patients", "also", "undergo", "mandatory", "training"], ["used", "opioids", "12", "years", "increased", "amount", "time", "studied", "pain", "medication", "addiction"], ["one", "doctor", "time", "told", "one", "thing", "learned"], ["know", "doctors"], ["doctors", "passing", "pills", "n't", "understand", "patients", "even", "less", "understanding", "use"], ["wonder", "big", "problem"]] | [["NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBN", "NNS", "CD", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "CD", "NN", "VBD"], ["VBP", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "RBR", "NN", "VB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN"]] | patients also undergo mandatory training. used opioids 12 years increased amount time studied pain medication addiction. one doctor time told one thing learned. know doctors. doctors passing pills n't understand patients even less understanding use. wonder big problem | ["pain", "medication"] | pain medication | 1 | 1 |
Jim S. | In this topic I see another great tax scam, albeit one that for a change would mostly benefit the poor: "Hey Mom, I want to drop out of school. Is that OK with you? You tell them you're home schooling me, take the tax credit, they'll never know the difference, and I'm out of there. And would you mind splitting that money with me?" | home schoolers | A5199-P | home schoolers | 0 | 1 | 17,972 | 3,172,514 | [["topic", "see", "another", "great", "tax", "scam", "albeit", "one", "change", "would", "mostly", "benefit", "poor", "hey", "mom", "want", "drop", "school"], ["ok"], ["tell", "'re", "home", "schooling", "take", "tax", "credit", "'ll", "never", "know", "difference", "'m"], ["would", "mind", "splitting", "money"]] | [["NN", "VBP", "DT", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "IN", "CD", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "UH", "NNP", "VBP", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ"], ["VBP", "VBP", "RB", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | topic see another great tax scam albeit one change would mostly benefit poor hey mom want drop school. ok. tell 're home schooling take tax credit 'll never know difference 'm. would mind splitting money | ["home", "schoolers"] | home schoolers | 1 | 0 |
Jim S. | In this topic I see another great tax scam, albeit one that for a change would mostly benefit the poor: "Hey Mom, I want to drop out of school. Is that OK with you? You tell them you're home schooling me, take the tax credit, they'll never know the difference, and I'm out of there. And would you mind splitting that money with me?" | home schoolers | A5199-P | tax scam | 1 | 3 | 17,973 | 3,172,514 | [["topic", "see", "another", "great", "tax", "scam", "albeit", "one", "change", "would", "mostly", "benefit", "poor", "hey", "mom", "want", "drop", "school"], ["ok"], ["tell", "'re", "home", "schooling", "take", "tax", "credit", "'ll", "never", "know", "difference", "'m"], ["would", "mind", "splitting", "money"]] | [["NN", "VBP", "DT", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "IN", "CD", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "UH", "NNP", "VBP", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ"], ["VBP", "VBP", "RB", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | topic see another great tax scam albeit one change would mostly benefit poor hey mom want drop school. ok. tell 're home schooling take tax credit 'll never know difference 'm. would mind splitting money | ["tax", "scam"] | tax scam | 1 | 1 |
Jim S. | In this topic I see another great tax scam, albeit one that for a change would mostly benefit the poor: "Hey Mom, I want to drop out of school. Is that OK with you? You tell them you're home schooling me, take the tax credit, they'll never know the difference, and I'm out of there. And would you mind splitting that money with me?" | home schoolers | A5199-P | home schooling | 0 | 3 | 17,974 | 3,172,514 | [["topic", "see", "another", "great", "tax", "scam", "albeit", "one", "change", "would", "mostly", "benefit", "poor", "hey", "mom", "want", "drop", "school"], ["ok"], ["tell", "'re", "home", "schooling", "take", "tax", "credit", "'ll", "never", "know", "difference", "'m"], ["would", "mind", "splitting", "money"]] | [["NN", "VBP", "DT", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "IN", "CD", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "UH", "NNP", "VBP", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ"], ["VBP", "VBP", "RB", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | topic see another great tax scam albeit one change would mostly benefit poor hey mom want drop school. ok. tell 're home schooling take tax credit 'll never know difference 'm. would mind splitting money | ["home", "schooling"] | home schooling | 1 | 1 |
Jim S. | In this topic I see another great tax scam, albeit one that for a change would mostly benefit the poor: "Hey Mom, I want to drop out of school. Is that OK with you? You tell them you're home schooling me, take the tax credit, they'll never know the difference, and I'm out of there. And would you mind splitting that money with me?" | a tax break | A5200-P | a tax break | 0 | 1 | 17,979 | 3,172,514 | [["topic", "see", "another", "great", "tax", "scam", "albeit", "one", "change", "would", "mostly", "benefit", "poor", "hey", "mom", "want", "drop", "school"], ["ok"], ["tell", "'re", "home", "schooling", "take", "tax", "credit", "'ll", "never", "know", "difference", "'m"], ["would", "mind", "splitting", "money"]] | [["NN", "VBP", "DT", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "IN", "CD", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "UH", "NNP", "VBP", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ"], ["VBP", "VBP", "RB", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | topic see another great tax scam albeit one change would mostly benefit poor hey mom want drop school. ok. tell 're home schooling take tax credit 'll never know difference 'm. would mind splitting money | ["tax", "break"] | tax break | 1 | 0 |
Jim S. | In this topic I see another great tax scam, albeit one that for a change would mostly benefit the poor: "Hey Mom, I want to drop out of school. Is that OK with you? You tell them you're home schooling me, take the tax credit, they'll never know the difference, and I'm out of there. And would you mind splitting that money with me?" | a tax break | A5200-P | homeschooling tax credits | 0 | 3 | 17,980 | 3,172,514 | [["topic", "see", "another", "great", "tax", "scam", "albeit", "one", "change", "would", "mostly", "benefit", "poor", "hey", "mom", "want", "drop", "school"], ["ok"], ["tell", "'re", "home", "schooling", "take", "tax", "credit", "'ll", "never", "know", "difference", "'m"], ["would", "mind", "splitting", "money"]] | [["NN", "VBP", "DT", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "IN", "CD", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "UH", "NNP", "VBP", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ"], ["VBP", "VBP", "RB", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | topic see another great tax scam albeit one change would mostly benefit poor hey mom want drop school. ok. tell 're home schooling take tax credit 'll never know difference 'm. would mind splitting money | ["homeschooling", "tax", "credit"] | homeschooling tax credit | 1 | 0 |
Jim S. | In this topic I see another great tax scam, albeit one that for a change would mostly benefit the poor: "Hey Mom, I want to drop out of school. Is that OK with you? You tell them you're home schooling me, take the tax credit, they'll never know the difference, and I'm out of there. And would you mind splitting that money with me?" | a tax break | A5200-P | tax credit | 0 | 3 | 17,981 | 3,172,514 | [["topic", "see", "another", "great", "tax", "scam", "albeit", "one", "change", "would", "mostly", "benefit", "poor", "hey", "mom", "want", "drop", "school"], ["ok"], ["tell", "'re", "home", "schooling", "take", "tax", "credit", "'ll", "never", "know", "difference", "'m"], ["would", "mind", "splitting", "money"]] | [["NN", "VBP", "DT", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "IN", "CD", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "UH", "NNP", "VBP", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ"], ["VBP", "VBP", "RB", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | topic see another great tax scam albeit one change would mostly benefit poor hey mom want drop school. ok. tell 're home schooling take tax credit 'll never know difference 'm. would mind splitting money | ["tax", "credit"] | tax credit | 1 | 1 |
Cathy Kayser | Freedom of speech apparently doesn't protect those who criticize Islam, Islamofascism and Sharia law. It's a sad day when it's perfectly legal to burn the US flag, the Bible, effigies of unpopular political characters, but not the Koran. Muslims need to learn that Islam is just another religion with no greater status or legal protection than any other religion. If they don't like it they should move to repressive countries in the Middle East that live, work and think about 1000 years behind the West. They're free to leave. They are not free to impinge on Americans' right and liberties. Unlike other countries, the US must never consider freedom of speech a negotiable right, protected for some and not others. | public workers | A1144-P | public workers | 0 | 1 | 9,115 | 2,566,312 | [["freedom", "speech", "apparently", "n't", "protect", "criticize", "islam", "islamofascism", "sharia", "law"], ["'s", "sad", "day", "'s", "perfectly", "legal", "burn", "us", "flag", "bible", "effigies", "unpopular", "political", "characters", "koran"], ["muslims", "need", "learn", "islam", "another", "religion", "greater", "status", "legal", "protection", "religion"], ["n't", "like", "move", "repressive", "countries", "middle", "east", "live", "work", "think", "1000", "years", "behind", "west"], ["'re", "free", "leave"], ["free", "impinge", "americans", "right", "liberties"], ["unlike", "countries", "us", "must", "never", "consider", "freedom", "speech", "negotiable", "right", "protected", "others"]] | [["NN", "NN", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP"], ["NNPS", "VBP", "VB", "NNP", "DT", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VBP", "VBP", "VBP", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "JJ", "VB"], ["JJ", "VB", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "NNP", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NNS"]] | freedom speech apparently n't protect criticize islam islamofascism sharia law. 's sad day 's perfectly legal burn us flag bible effigies unpopular political characters koran. muslims need learn islam another religion greater status legal protection religion. n't like move repressive countries middle east live work think 1000 years behind west. 're free leave. free impinge americans right liberties. unlike countries us must never consider freedom speech negotiable right protected others | ["public", "worker"] | public worker | 1 | 0 |
Cathy Kayser | Freedom of speech apparently doesn't protect those who criticize Islam, Islamofascism and Sharia law. It's a sad day when it's perfectly legal to burn the US flag, the Bible, effigies of unpopular political characters, but not the Koran. Muslims need to learn that Islam is just another religion with no greater status or legal protection than any other religion. If they don't like it they should move to repressive countries in the Middle East that live, work and think about 1000 years behind the West. They're free to leave. They are not free to impinge on Americans' right and liberties. Unlike other countries, the US must never consider freedom of speech a negotiable right, protected for some and not others. | public workers | A1144-P | freedom of speach | 0 | 3 | 9,116 | 2,566,312 | [["freedom", "speech", "apparently", "n't", "protect", "criticize", "islam", "islamofascism", "sharia", "law"], ["'s", "sad", "day", "'s", "perfectly", "legal", "burn", "us", "flag", "bible", "effigies", "unpopular", "political", "characters", "koran"], ["muslims", "need", "learn", "islam", "another", "religion", "greater", "status", "legal", "protection", "religion"], ["n't", "like", "move", "repressive", "countries", "middle", "east", "live", "work", "think", "1000", "years", "behind", "west"], ["'re", "free", "leave"], ["free", "impinge", "americans", "right", "liberties"], ["unlike", "countries", "us", "must", "never", "consider", "freedom", "speech", "negotiable", "right", "protected", "others"]] | [["NN", "NN", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP"], ["NNPS", "VBP", "VB", "NNP", "DT", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VBP", "VBP", "VBP", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "JJ", "VB"], ["JJ", "VB", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "NNP", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NNS"]] | freedom speech apparently n't protect criticize islam islamofascism sharia law. 's sad day 's perfectly legal burn us flag bible effigies unpopular political characters koran. muslims need learn islam another religion greater status legal protection religion. n't like move repressive countries middle east live work think 1000 years behind west. 're free leave. free impinge americans right liberties. unlike countries us must never consider freedom speech negotiable right protected others | ["freedom", "speach"] | freedom speach | 1 | 0 |
Cathy Kayser | Freedom of speech apparently doesn't protect those who criticize Islam, Islamofascism and Sharia law. It's a sad day when it's perfectly legal to burn the US flag, the Bible, effigies of unpopular political characters, but not the Koran. Muslims need to learn that Islam is just another religion with no greater status or legal protection than any other religion. If they don't like it they should move to repressive countries in the Middle East that live, work and think about 1000 years behind the West. They're free to leave. They are not free to impinge on Americans' right and liberties. Unlike other countries, the US must never consider freedom of speech a negotiable right, protected for some and not others. | public workers | A1144-P | freedom of speech | 1 | 2 | 9,117 | 2,566,312 | [["freedom", "speech", "apparently", "n't", "protect", "criticize", "islam", "islamofascism", "sharia", "law"], ["'s", "sad", "day", "'s", "perfectly", "legal", "burn", "us", "flag", "bible", "effigies", "unpopular", "political", "characters", "koran"], ["muslims", "need", "learn", "islam", "another", "religion", "greater", "status", "legal", "protection", "religion"], ["n't", "like", "move", "repressive", "countries", "middle", "east", "live", "work", "think", "1000", "years", "behind", "west"], ["'re", "free", "leave"], ["free", "impinge", "americans", "right", "liberties"], ["unlike", "countries", "us", "must", "never", "consider", "freedom", "speech", "negotiable", "right", "protected", "others"]] | [["NN", "NN", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP"], ["NNPS", "VBP", "VB", "NNP", "DT", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VBP", "VBP", "VBP", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "JJ", "VB"], ["JJ", "VB", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "NNP", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NNS"]] | freedom speech apparently n't protect criticize islam islamofascism sharia law. 's sad day 's perfectly legal burn us flag bible effigies unpopular political characters koran. muslims need learn islam another religion greater status legal protection religion. n't like move repressive countries middle east live work think 1000 years behind west. 're free leave. free impinge americans right liberties. unlike countries us must never consider freedom speech negotiable right protected others | ["freedom", "speech"] | freedom speech | 1 | 1 |
Cathy Kayser | Freedom of speech apparently doesn't protect those who criticize Islam, Islamofascism and Sharia law. It's a sad day when it's perfectly legal to burn the US flag, the Bible, effigies of unpopular political characters, but not the Koran. Muslims need to learn that Islam is just another religion with no greater status or legal protection than any other religion. If they don't like it they should move to repressive countries in the Middle East that live, work and think about 1000 years behind the West. They're free to leave. They are not free to impinge on Americans' right and liberties. Unlike other countries, the US must never consider freedom of speech a negotiable right, protected for some and not others. | public workers | A1144-P | muslim | 1 | 3 | 9,118 | 2,566,312 | [["freedom", "speech", "apparently", "n't", "protect", "criticize", "islam", "islamofascism", "sharia", "law"], ["'s", "sad", "day", "'s", "perfectly", "legal", "burn", "us", "flag", "bible", "effigies", "unpopular", "political", "characters", "koran"], ["muslims", "need", "learn", "islam", "another", "religion", "greater", "status", "legal", "protection", "religion"], ["n't", "like", "move", "repressive", "countries", "middle", "east", "live", "work", "think", "1000", "years", "behind", "west"], ["'re", "free", "leave"], ["free", "impinge", "americans", "right", "liberties"], ["unlike", "countries", "us", "must", "never", "consider", "freedom", "speech", "negotiable", "right", "protected", "others"]] | [["NN", "NN", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP"], ["NNPS", "VBP", "VB", "NNP", "DT", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VBP", "VBP", "VBP", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "JJ", "VB"], ["JJ", "VB", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "NNP", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NNS"]] | freedom speech apparently n't protect criticize islam islamofascism sharia law. 's sad day 's perfectly legal burn us flag bible effigies unpopular political characters koran. muslims need learn islam another religion greater status legal protection religion. n't like move repressive countries middle east live work think 1000 years behind west. 're free leave. free impinge americans right liberties. unlike countries us must never consider freedom speech negotiable right protected others | ["muslim"] | muslim | 1 | 1 |
Cathy Kayser | Freedom of speech apparently doesn't protect those who criticize Islam, Islamofascism and Sharia law. It's a sad day when it's perfectly legal to burn the US flag, the Bible, effigies of unpopular political characters, but not the Koran. Muslims need to learn that Islam is just another religion with no greater status or legal protection than any other religion. If they don't like it they should move to repressive countries in the Middle East that live, work and think about 1000 years behind the West. They're free to leave. They are not free to impinge on Americans' right and liberties. Unlike other countries, the US must never consider freedom of speech a negotiable right, protected for some and not others. | speech | A1143-P | speech | 1 | 1 | 18,714 | 2,566,312 | [["freedom", "speech", "apparently", "n't", "protect", "criticize", "islam", "islamofascism", "sharia", "law"], ["'s", "sad", "day", "'s", "perfectly", "legal", "burn", "us", "flag", "bible", "effigies", "unpopular", "political", "characters", "koran"], ["muslims", "need", "learn", "islam", "another", "religion", "greater", "status", "legal", "protection", "religion"], ["n't", "like", "move", "repressive", "countries", "middle", "east", "live", "work", "think", "1000", "years", "behind", "west"], ["'re", "free", "leave"], ["free", "impinge", "americans", "right", "liberties"], ["unlike", "countries", "us", "must", "never", "consider", "freedom", "speech", "negotiable", "right", "protected", "others"]] | [["NN", "NN", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP"], ["NNPS", "VBP", "VB", "NNP", "DT", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VBP", "VBP", "VBP", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "JJ", "VB"], ["JJ", "VB", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "NNP", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NNS"]] | freedom speech apparently n't protect criticize islam islamofascism sharia law. 's sad day 's perfectly legal burn us flag bible effigies unpopular political characters koran. muslims need learn islam another religion greater status legal protection religion. n't like move repressive countries middle east live work think 1000 years behind west. 're free leave. free impinge americans right liberties. unlike countries us must never consider freedom speech negotiable right protected others | ["speech"] | speech | 1 | 1 |
Cathy Kayser | Freedom of speech apparently doesn't protect those who criticize Islam, Islamofascism and Sharia law. It's a sad day when it's perfectly legal to burn the US flag, the Bible, effigies of unpopular political characters, but not the Koran. Muslims need to learn that Islam is just another religion with no greater status or legal protection than any other religion. If they don't like it they should move to repressive countries in the Middle East that live, work and think about 1000 years behind the West. They're free to leave. They are not free to impinge on Americans' right and liberties. Unlike other countries, the US must never consider freedom of speech a negotiable right, protected for some and not others. | speech | A1143-P | impinge on americans | 1 | 3 | 18,715 | 2,566,312 | [["freedom", "speech", "apparently", "n't", "protect", "criticize", "islam", "islamofascism", "sharia", "law"], ["'s", "sad", "day", "'s", "perfectly", "legal", "burn", "us", "flag", "bible", "effigies", "unpopular", "political", "characters", "koran"], ["muslims", "need", "learn", "islam", "another", "religion", "greater", "status", "legal", "protection", "religion"], ["n't", "like", "move", "repressive", "countries", "middle", "east", "live", "work", "think", "1000", "years", "behind", "west"], ["'re", "free", "leave"], ["free", "impinge", "americans", "right", "liberties"], ["unlike", "countries", "us", "must", "never", "consider", "freedom", "speech", "negotiable", "right", "protected", "others"]] | [["NN", "NN", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP"], ["NNPS", "VBP", "VB", "NNP", "DT", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VBP", "VBP", "VBP", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "JJ", "VB"], ["JJ", "VB", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "NNP", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NNS"]] | freedom speech apparently n't protect criticize islam islamofascism sharia law. 's sad day 's perfectly legal burn us flag bible effigies unpopular political characters koran. muslims need learn islam another religion greater status legal protection religion. n't like move repressive countries middle east live work think 1000 years behind west. 're free leave. free impinge americans right liberties. unlike countries us must never consider freedom speech negotiable right protected others | ["impinge", "american"] | impinge american | 1 | 1 |
Cathy Kayser | Freedom of speech apparently doesn't protect those who criticize Islam, Islamofascism and Sharia law. It's a sad day when it's perfectly legal to burn the US flag, the Bible, effigies of unpopular political characters, but not the Koran. Muslims need to learn that Islam is just another religion with no greater status or legal protection than any other religion. If they don't like it they should move to repressive countries in the Middle East that live, work and think about 1000 years behind the West. They're free to leave. They are not free to impinge on Americans' right and liberties. Unlike other countries, the US must never consider freedom of speech a negotiable right, protected for some and not others. | speech | A1143-P | religious criticism | 1 | 3 | 18,716 | 2,566,312 | [["freedom", "speech", "apparently", "n't", "protect", "criticize", "islam", "islamofascism", "sharia", "law"], ["'s", "sad", "day", "'s", "perfectly", "legal", "burn", "us", "flag", "bible", "effigies", "unpopular", "political", "characters", "koran"], ["muslims", "need", "learn", "islam", "another", "religion", "greater", "status", "legal", "protection", "religion"], ["n't", "like", "move", "repressive", "countries", "middle", "east", "live", "work", "think", "1000", "years", "behind", "west"], ["'re", "free", "leave"], ["free", "impinge", "americans", "right", "liberties"], ["unlike", "countries", "us", "must", "never", "consider", "freedom", "speech", "negotiable", "right", "protected", "others"]] | [["NN", "NN", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP"], ["NNPS", "VBP", "VB", "NNP", "DT", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VBP", "VBP", "VBP", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "JJ", "VB"], ["JJ", "VB", "NNPS", "NN", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "NNP", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NNS"]] | freedom speech apparently n't protect criticize islam islamofascism sharia law. 's sad day 's perfectly legal burn us flag bible effigies unpopular political characters koran. muslims need learn islam another religion greater status legal protection religion. n't like move repressive countries middle east live work think 1000 years behind west. 're free leave. free impinge americans right liberties. unlike countries us must never consider freedom speech negotiable right protected others | ["religious", "criticism"] | religious criticism | 1 | 0 |
LMS | I think generally it is safe to leave it with the experts. I would like to know, though, if anyone has ever experienced over-salting by a chef. I had one bad experience where the food was exteremely over-salted. Not that all of them smoke, but I've wondered on occasion whether smoking habits can sometimes affect the palette of chefs. | a place at the table | A1780-P | cook | 2 | 2 | 10,611 | 9,947,304 | [["think", "generally", "safe", "leave", "experts"], ["would", "like", "know", "though", "anyone", "ever", "experienced", "salting", "chef"], ["one", "bad", "experience", "food", "exteremely", "salted"], ["smoke", "'ve", "wondered", "occasion", "whether", "smoking", "habits", "sometimes", "affect", "palette", "chefs"]] | [["VBP", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NNS"], ["MD", "VB", "VB", "RB", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN"], ["VBP", "VB", "VBN", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NNS"]] | think generally safe leave experts. would like know though anyone ever experienced salting chef. one bad experience food exteremely salted. smoke 've wondered occasion whether smoking habits sometimes affect palette chefs | ["cook"] | cook | 1 | 0 |
LMS | I think generally it is safe to leave it with the experts. I would like to know, though, if anyone has ever experienced over-salting by a chef. I had one bad experience where the food was exteremely over-salted. Not that all of them smoke, but I've wondered on occasion whether smoking habits can sometimes affect the palette of chefs. | a place at the table | A1780-P | salt | 2 | 3 | 10,612 | 9,947,304 | [["think", "generally", "safe", "leave", "experts"], ["would", "like", "know", "though", "anyone", "ever", "experienced", "salting", "chef"], ["one", "bad", "experience", "food", "exteremely", "salted"], ["smoke", "'ve", "wondered", "occasion", "whether", "smoking", "habits", "sometimes", "affect", "palette", "chefs"]] | [["VBP", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NNS"], ["MD", "VB", "VB", "RB", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN"], ["VBP", "VB", "VBN", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NNS"]] | think generally safe leave experts. would like know though anyone ever experienced salting chef. one bad experience food exteremely salted. smoke 've wondered occasion whether smoking habits sometimes affect palette chefs | ["salt"] | salt | 1 | 1 |
LMS | I think generally it is safe to leave it with the experts. I would like to know, though, if anyone has ever experienced over-salting by a chef. I had one bad experience where the food was exteremely over-salted. Not that all of them smoke, but I've wondered on occasion whether smoking habits can sometimes affect the palette of chefs. | salt | A1779-P | salt | 0 | 1 | 19,268 | 9,947,304 | [["think", "generally", "safe", "leave", "experts"], ["would", "like", "know", "though", "anyone", "ever", "experienced", "salting", "chef"], ["one", "bad", "experience", "food", "exteremely", "salted"], ["smoke", "'ve", "wondered", "occasion", "whether", "smoking", "habits", "sometimes", "affect", "palette", "chefs"]] | [["VBP", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NNS"], ["MD", "VB", "VB", "RB", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN"], ["VBP", "VB", "VBN", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NNS"]] | think generally safe leave experts. would like know though anyone ever experienced salting chef. one bad experience food exteremely salted. smoke 've wondered occasion whether smoking habits sometimes affect palette chefs | ["salt"] | salt | 1 | 1 |
LMS | I think generally it is safe to leave it with the experts. I would like to know, though, if anyone has ever experienced over-salting by a chef. I had one bad experience where the food was exteremely over-salted. Not that all of them smoke, but I've wondered on occasion whether smoking habits can sometimes affect the palette of chefs. | salt | A1779-P | over-salting | 0 | 3 | 19,269 | 9,947,304 | [["think", "generally", "safe", "leave", "experts"], ["would", "like", "know", "though", "anyone", "ever", "experienced", "salting", "chef"], ["one", "bad", "experience", "food", "exteremely", "salted"], ["smoke", "'ve", "wondered", "occasion", "whether", "smoking", "habits", "sometimes", "affect", "palette", "chefs"]] | [["VBP", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NNS"], ["MD", "VB", "VB", "RB", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN"], ["VBP", "VB", "VBN", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NNS"]] | think generally safe leave experts. would like know though anyone ever experienced salting chef. one bad experience food exteremely salted. smoke 've wondered occasion whether smoking habits sometimes affect palette chefs | ["over", "salting"] | over salting | 1 | 0 |
LMS | I think generally it is safe to leave it with the experts. I would like to know, though, if anyone has ever experienced over-salting by a chef. I had one bad experience where the food was exteremely over-salted. Not that all of them smoke, but I've wondered on occasion whether smoking habits can sometimes affect the palette of chefs. | salt | A1779-P | none | 2 | 2 | 19,270 | 9,947,304 | [["think", "generally", "safe", "leave", "experts"], ["would", "like", "know", "though", "anyone", "ever", "experienced", "salting", "chef"], ["one", "bad", "experience", "food", "exteremely", "salted"], ["smoke", "'ve", "wondered", "occasion", "whether", "smoking", "habits", "sometimes", "affect", "palette", "chefs"]] | [["VBP", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NNS"], ["MD", "VB", "VB", "RB", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN"], ["VBP", "VB", "VBN", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NNS"]] | think generally safe leave experts. would like know though anyone ever experienced salting chef. one bad experience food exteremely salted. smoke 've wondered occasion whether smoking habits sometimes affect palette chefs | ["none"] | none | 1 | 0 |
LMS | I think generally it is safe to leave it with the experts. I would like to know, though, if anyone has ever experienced over-salting by a chef. I had one bad experience where the food was exteremely over-salted. Not that all of them smoke, but I've wondered on occasion whether smoking habits can sometimes affect the palette of chefs. | salt | A1779-P | using salt | 2 | 3 | 19,271 | 9,947,304 | [["think", "generally", "safe", "leave", "experts"], ["would", "like", "know", "though", "anyone", "ever", "experienced", "salting", "chef"], ["one", "bad", "experience", "food", "exteremely", "salted"], ["smoke", "'ve", "wondered", "occasion", "whether", "smoking", "habits", "sometimes", "affect", "palette", "chefs"]] | [["VBP", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NNS"], ["MD", "VB", "VB", "RB", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBN"], ["VBP", "VB", "VBN", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NNS"]] | think generally safe leave experts. would like know though anyone ever experienced salting chef. one bad experience food exteremely salted. smoke 've wondered occasion whether smoking habits sometimes affect palette chefs | ["using", "salt"] | using salt | 1 | 0 |
Joe | I should not be surprised at the high level of naive, inaccurate and incorrect comments. Some of these readers need to research about what they believe about electric cars. Some misconceptions are that batteries don't last that long (they do and are easily recyclable), biodiesel is a viable fuel source of trans fuel for the planet (will not hardly make a dent in demand), fuel cells technology is possible soon (long way off), environmentalists are responsible for keeping diesel cars out of the USA (VW is selling them and the EPA is responsible for clean air.) Electric costs will go up. (A larger percentage of charging will be in off-peak hours making power companies more efficient since they have to power up and down every night and incentives to build more efficient and alternative generation.) Or for no other reason, it's just plain stupid to make an electric car. (Don't buy one then.) | electric cars | A3900-P | electric cars | 1 | 1 | 11,371 | 2,656,425 | [["surprised", "high", "level", "naive", "inaccurate", "incorrect", "comments"], ["readers", "need", "research", "believe", "electric", "cars"], ["misconceptions", "batteries", "n't", "last", "long", "easily", "recyclable", "biodiesel", "viable", "fuel", "source", "trans", "fuel", "planet", "hardly", "make", "dent", "demand", "fuel", "cells", "technology", "possible", "soon", "long", "way", "environmentalists", "responsible", "keeping", "diesel", "cars", "usa", "vw", "selling", "epa", "responsible", "clean", "air"], ["electric", "costs", "go"], ["larger", "percentage", "charging", "peak", "hours", "making", "power", "companies", "efficient", "since", "power", "every", "night", "incentives", "build", "efficient", "alternative", "generation"], ["reason", "'s", "plain", "stupid", "make", "electric", "car"], ["n't", "buy", "one"]] | [["JJ", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NNS", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "RB", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VBG", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VB"], ["JJR", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "IN", "VB", "DT", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NN"]] | surprised high level naive inaccurate incorrect comments. readers need research believe electric cars. misconceptions batteries n't last long easily recyclable biodiesel viable fuel source trans fuel planet hardly make dent demand fuel cells technology possible soon long way environmentalists responsible keeping diesel cars usa vw selling epa responsible clean air. electric costs go. larger percentage charging peak hours making power companies efficient since power every night incentives build efficient alternative generation. reason 's plain stupid make electric car. n't buy one | ["electric", "car"] | electric car | 1 | 1 |
Joe | I should not be surprised at the high level of naive, inaccurate and incorrect comments. Some of these readers need to research about what they believe about electric cars. Some misconceptions are that batteries don't last that long (they do and are easily recyclable), biodiesel is a viable fuel source of trans fuel for the planet (will not hardly make a dent in demand), fuel cells technology is possible soon (long way off), environmentalists are responsible for keeping diesel cars out of the USA (VW is selling them and the EPA is responsible for clean air.) Electric costs will go up. (A larger percentage of charging will be in off-peak hours making power companies more efficient since they have to power up and down every night and incentives to build more efficient and alternative generation.) Or for no other reason, it's just plain stupid to make an electric car. (Don't buy one then.) | electric cars | A3900-P | research on electric cars | 1 | 3 | 11,372 | 2,656,425 | [["surprised", "high", "level", "naive", "inaccurate", "incorrect", "comments"], ["readers", "need", "research", "believe", "electric", "cars"], ["misconceptions", "batteries", "n't", "last", "long", "easily", "recyclable", "biodiesel", "viable", "fuel", "source", "trans", "fuel", "planet", "hardly", "make", "dent", "demand", "fuel", "cells", "technology", "possible", "soon", "long", "way", "environmentalists", "responsible", "keeping", "diesel", "cars", "usa", "vw", "selling", "epa", "responsible", "clean", "air"], ["electric", "costs", "go"], ["larger", "percentage", "charging", "peak", "hours", "making", "power", "companies", "efficient", "since", "power", "every", "night", "incentives", "build", "efficient", "alternative", "generation"], ["reason", "'s", "plain", "stupid", "make", "electric", "car"], ["n't", "buy", "one"]] | [["JJ", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NNS", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "RB", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VBG", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VB"], ["JJR", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "IN", "VB", "DT", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NN"]] | surprised high level naive inaccurate incorrect comments. readers need research believe electric cars. misconceptions batteries n't last long easily recyclable biodiesel viable fuel source trans fuel planet hardly make dent demand fuel cells technology possible soon long way environmentalists responsible keeping diesel cars usa vw selling epa responsible clean air. electric costs go. larger percentage charging peak hours making power companies efficient since power every night incentives build efficient alternative generation. reason 's plain stupid make electric car. n't buy one | ["research", "electric", "car"] | research electric car | 1 | 0 |
Joe | I should not be surprised at the high level of naive, inaccurate and incorrect comments. Some of these readers need to research about what they believe about electric cars. Some misconceptions are that batteries don't last that long (they do and are easily recyclable), biodiesel is a viable fuel source of trans fuel for the planet (will not hardly make a dent in demand), fuel cells technology is possible soon (long way off), environmentalists are responsible for keeping diesel cars out of the USA (VW is selling them and the EPA is responsible for clean air.) Electric costs will go up. (A larger percentage of charging will be in off-peak hours making power companies more efficient since they have to power up and down every night and incentives to build more efficient and alternative generation.) Or for no other reason, it's just plain stupid to make an electric car. (Don't buy one then.) | electric cars | A3900-P | electric cars | 1 | 3 | 11,373 | 2,656,425 | [["surprised", "high", "level", "naive", "inaccurate", "incorrect", "comments"], ["readers", "need", "research", "believe", "electric", "cars"], ["misconceptions", "batteries", "n't", "last", "long", "easily", "recyclable", "biodiesel", "viable", "fuel", "source", "trans", "fuel", "planet", "hardly", "make", "dent", "demand", "fuel", "cells", "technology", "possible", "soon", "long", "way", "environmentalists", "responsible", "keeping", "diesel", "cars", "usa", "vw", "selling", "epa", "responsible", "clean", "air"], ["electric", "costs", "go"], ["larger", "percentage", "charging", "peak", "hours", "making", "power", "companies", "efficient", "since", "power", "every", "night", "incentives", "build", "efficient", "alternative", "generation"], ["reason", "'s", "plain", "stupid", "make", "electric", "car"], ["n't", "buy", "one"]] | [["JJ", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NNS", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "RB", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VBG", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VB"], ["JJR", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "IN", "VB", "DT", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NN"]] | surprised high level naive inaccurate incorrect comments. readers need research believe electric cars. misconceptions batteries n't last long easily recyclable biodiesel viable fuel source trans fuel planet hardly make dent demand fuel cells technology possible soon long way environmentalists responsible keeping diesel cars usa vw selling epa responsible clean air. electric costs go. larger percentage charging peak hours making power companies efficient since power every night incentives build efficient alternative generation. reason 's plain stupid make electric car. n't buy one | ["electric", "car"] | electric car | 1 | 1 |
Joe | I should not be surprised at the high level of naive, inaccurate and incorrect comments. Some of these readers need to research about what they believe about electric cars. Some misconceptions are that batteries don't last that long (they do and are easily recyclable), biodiesel is a viable fuel source of trans fuel for the planet (will not hardly make a dent in demand), fuel cells technology is possible soon (long way off), environmentalists are responsible for keeping diesel cars out of the USA (VW is selling them and the EPA is responsible for clean air.) Electric costs will go up. (A larger percentage of charging will be in off-peak hours making power companies more efficient since they have to power up and down every night and incentives to build more efficient and alternative generation.) Or for no other reason, it's just plain stupid to make an electric car. (Don't buy one then.) | electric cars | A3900-P | electric vehicles | 1 | 3 | 11,374 | 2,656,425 | [["surprised", "high", "level", "naive", "inaccurate", "incorrect", "comments"], ["readers", "need", "research", "believe", "electric", "cars"], ["misconceptions", "batteries", "n't", "last", "long", "easily", "recyclable", "biodiesel", "viable", "fuel", "source", "trans", "fuel", "planet", "hardly", "make", "dent", "demand", "fuel", "cells", "technology", "possible", "soon", "long", "way", "environmentalists", "responsible", "keeping", "diesel", "cars", "usa", "vw", "selling", "epa", "responsible", "clean", "air"], ["electric", "costs", "go"], ["larger", "percentage", "charging", "peak", "hours", "making", "power", "companies", "efficient", "since", "power", "every", "night", "incentives", "build", "efficient", "alternative", "generation"], ["reason", "'s", "plain", "stupid", "make", "electric", "car"], ["n't", "buy", "one"]] | [["JJ", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NNS", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "RB", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VBG", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VB"], ["JJR", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "IN", "VB", "DT", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "VB", "NN"]] | surprised high level naive inaccurate incorrect comments. readers need research believe electric cars. misconceptions batteries n't last long easily recyclable biodiesel viable fuel source trans fuel planet hardly make dent demand fuel cells technology possible soon long way environmentalists responsible keeping diesel cars usa vw selling epa responsible clean air. electric costs go. larger percentage charging peak hours making power companies efficient since power every night incentives build efficient alternative generation. reason 's plain stupid make electric car. n't buy one | ["electric", "vehicle"] | electric vehicle | 1 | 0 |
Nightwood | Justice Ginsburg is old enough to do whatever she wants! A sort of old age privilege available to anybody who has passed their 80th birthday. And Trump is dangerous enough to scare even the devil. Ginsburg did the right thing. | elections | A3052-P | justice gisnberg | 1 | 2 | 3,193 | 19,122,355 | [["justice", "ginsburg", "old", "enough", "whatever", "wants"], ["sort", "old", "age", "privilege", "available", "anybody", "passed", "80th", "birthday"], ["trump", "dangerous", "enough", "scare", "even", "devil"], ["ginsburg", "right", "thing"]] | [["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "RB", "WDT", "VBZ"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "RB", "VB", "RB", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN"]] | justice ginsburg old enough whatever wants. sort old age privilege available anybody passed 80th birthday. trump dangerous enough scare even devil. ginsburg right thing | ["justice", "ginsberg"] | justice ginsberg | 1 | 0 |
Nightwood | Justice Ginsburg is old enough to do whatever she wants! A sort of old age privilege available to anybody who has passed their 80th birthday. And Trump is dangerous enough to scare even the devil. Ginsburg did the right thing. | elections | A3052-P | free will | 1 | 2 | 3,194 | 19,122,355 | [["justice", "ginsburg", "old", "enough", "whatever", "wants"], ["sort", "old", "age", "privilege", "available", "anybody", "passed", "80th", "birthday"], ["trump", "dangerous", "enough", "scare", "even", "devil"], ["ginsburg", "right", "thing"]] | [["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "RB", "WDT", "VBZ"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "RB", "VB", "RB", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN"]] | justice ginsburg old enough whatever wants. sort old age privilege available anybody passed 80th birthday. trump dangerous enough scare even devil. ginsburg right thing | ["free"] | free | 1 | 0 |
Nightwood | Justice Ginsburg is old enough to do whatever she wants! A sort of old age privilege available to anybody who has passed their 80th birthday. And Trump is dangerous enough to scare even the devil. Ginsburg did the right thing. | elections | A3052-P | justice ginsburg | 1 | 3 | 3,195 | 19,122,355 | [["justice", "ginsburg", "old", "enough", "whatever", "wants"], ["sort", "old", "age", "privilege", "available", "anybody", "passed", "80th", "birthday"], ["trump", "dangerous", "enough", "scare", "even", "devil"], ["ginsburg", "right", "thing"]] | [["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "RB", "WDT", "VBZ"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "RB", "VB", "RB", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN"]] | justice ginsburg old enough whatever wants. sort old age privilege available anybody passed 80th birthday. trump dangerous enough scare even devil. ginsburg right thing | ["justice", "ginsburg"] | justice ginsburg | 1 | 1 |
Nightwood | Justice Ginsburg is old enough to do whatever she wants! A sort of old age privilege available to anybody who has passed their 80th birthday. And Trump is dangerous enough to scare even the devil. Ginsburg did the right thing. | elections | A3052-P | political figures | 1 | 3 | 3,196 | 19,122,355 | [["justice", "ginsburg", "old", "enough", "whatever", "wants"], ["sort", "old", "age", "privilege", "available", "anybody", "passed", "80th", "birthday"], ["trump", "dangerous", "enough", "scare", "even", "devil"], ["ginsburg", "right", "thing"]] | [["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "RB", "WDT", "VBZ"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "RB", "VB", "RB", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJ", "NN"]] | justice ginsburg old enough whatever wants. sort old age privilege available anybody passed 80th birthday. trump dangerous enough scare even devil. ginsburg right thing | ["political", "figure"] | political figure | 1 | 0 |
Vipul Mehta | There are jobs that do no require concentration, focus, thought, or problem solving. Management is such a job. Marketing and sales is another. But for most everyone else open offices are the worst idea of all times. You will see that management will come up with such stupid ideas, and the marketing people will love it. The concept of thought is foreign to them, they think that the world goes around by everyone attending meetings all day. Again, worst idea of all times. | office layout | A5215-P | management careers | 1 | 2 | 3,122 | 13,846,711 | [["jobs", "require", "concentration", "focus", "thought", "problem", "solving"], ["management", "job"], ["marketing", "sales", "another"], ["everyone", "else", "open", "offices", "worst", "idea", "times"], ["see", "management", "come", "stupid", "ideas", "marketing", "people", "love"], ["concept", "thought", "foreign", "think", "world", "goes", "around", "everyone", "attending", "meetings", "day"], ["worst", "idea", "times"]] | [["NNS", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "NN", "VBG"], ["NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "DT"], ["NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "JJS", "NN", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VB"], ["NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBP", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NN"], ["JJS", "NN", "NNS"]] | jobs require concentration focus thought problem solving. management job. marketing sales another. everyone else open offices worst idea times. see management come stupid ideas marketing people love. concept thought foreign think world goes around everyone attending meetings day. worst idea times | ["management", "career"] | management career | 1 | 0 |
Vipul Mehta | There are jobs that do no require concentration, focus, thought, or problem solving. Management is such a job. Marketing and sales is another. But for most everyone else open offices are the worst idea of all times. You will see that management will come up with such stupid ideas, and the marketing people will love it. The concept of thought is foreign to them, they think that the world goes around by everyone attending meetings all day. Again, worst idea of all times. | office layout | A5215-P | stupid managers | 0 | 2 | 3,123 | 13,846,711 | [["jobs", "require", "concentration", "focus", "thought", "problem", "solving"], ["management", "job"], ["marketing", "sales", "another"], ["everyone", "else", "open", "offices", "worst", "idea", "times"], ["see", "management", "come", "stupid", "ideas", "marketing", "people", "love"], ["concept", "thought", "foreign", "think", "world", "goes", "around", "everyone", "attending", "meetings", "day"], ["worst", "idea", "times"]] | [["NNS", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "NN", "VBG"], ["NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "DT"], ["NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "JJS", "NN", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VB"], ["NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBP", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NN"], ["JJS", "NN", "NNS"]] | jobs require concentration focus thought problem solving. management job. marketing sales another. everyone else open offices worst idea times. see management come stupid ideas marketing people love. concept thought foreign think world goes around everyone attending meetings day. worst idea times | ["stupid", "manager"] | stupid manager | 1 | 0 |
Vipul Mehta | There are jobs that do no require concentration, focus, thought, or problem solving. Management is such a job. Marketing and sales is another. But for most everyone else open offices are the worst idea of all times. You will see that management will come up with such stupid ideas, and the marketing people will love it. The concept of thought is foreign to them, they think that the world goes around by everyone attending meetings all day. Again, worst idea of all times. | office layout | A5215-P | jobs and requirements | 1 | 3 | 3,124 | 13,846,711 | [["jobs", "require", "concentration", "focus", "thought", "problem", "solving"], ["management", "job"], ["marketing", "sales", "another"], ["everyone", "else", "open", "offices", "worst", "idea", "times"], ["see", "management", "come", "stupid", "ideas", "marketing", "people", "love"], ["concept", "thought", "foreign", "think", "world", "goes", "around", "everyone", "attending", "meetings", "day"], ["worst", "idea", "times"]] | [["NNS", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "NN", "VBG"], ["NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "DT"], ["NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "JJS", "NN", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VB"], ["NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBP", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NN"], ["JJS", "NN", "NNS"]] | jobs require concentration focus thought problem solving. management job. marketing sales another. everyone else open offices worst idea times. see management come stupid ideas marketing people love. concept thought foreign think world goes around everyone attending meetings day. worst idea times | ["job", "requirement"] | job requirement | 1 | 0 |
Vipul Mehta | There are jobs that do no require concentration, focus, thought, or problem solving. Management is such a job. Marketing and sales is another. But for most everyone else open offices are the worst idea of all times. You will see that management will come up with such stupid ideas, and the marketing people will love it. The concept of thought is foreign to them, they think that the world goes around by everyone attending meetings all day. Again, worst idea of all times. | office layout | A5215-P | easy jobs | 0 | 3 | 3,125 | 13,846,711 | [["jobs", "require", "concentration", "focus", "thought", "problem", "solving"], ["management", "job"], ["marketing", "sales", "another"], ["everyone", "else", "open", "offices", "worst", "idea", "times"], ["see", "management", "come", "stupid", "ideas", "marketing", "people", "love"], ["concept", "thought", "foreign", "think", "world", "goes", "around", "everyone", "attending", "meetings", "day"], ["worst", "idea", "times"]] | [["NNS", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "NN", "VBG"], ["NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "DT"], ["NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "JJS", "NN", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VB"], ["NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBP", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NN"], ["JJS", "NN", "NNS"]] | jobs require concentration focus thought problem solving. management job. marketing sales another. everyone else open offices worst idea times. see management come stupid ideas marketing people love. concept thought foreign think world goes around everyone attending meetings day. worst idea times | ["easy", "job"] | easy job | 1 | 0 |
B de St Phalle | Yes, years ago Presidents Nixon, Carter and Bush I were able to buck the pro-Israel community and achieve breakthroughs. A lot has changed since then. The religious right backs Israel for ideological reasons and Israel itself has moved a long way to the right. Obama is resisting efforts to drag the US into military action against Iran but Romney/Ryan are eager for it. Your conditions for success, a plan for peace and relationships with the leaders of Israel and the Palestinians based on trust and confidence, are unlikely to be met anytime soon. | israel | A2192-P | israel | 0 | 1 | 7,932 | 6,949,048 | [["yes", "years", "ago", "presidents", "nixon", "carter", "bush", "able", "buck", "pro", "israel", "community", "achieve", "breakthroughs"], ["lot", "changed", "since"], ["religious", "right", "backs", "israel", "ideological", "reasons", "israel", "moved", "long", "way", "right"], ["obama", "resisting", "efforts", "drag", "us", "military", "action", "iran", "romney", "ryan", "eager"], ["conditions", "success", "plan", "peace", "relationships", "leaders", "israel", "palestinians", "based", "trust", "confidence", "unlikely", "met", "anytime", "soon"]] | [["UH", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "VBP", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBN", "IN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NNP", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "VBG", "NNS", "VB", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "JJ"], ["NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NNP", "NNPS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBN", "RB", "RB"]] | yes years ago presidents nixon carter bush able buck pro israel community achieve breakthroughs. lot changed since. religious right backs israel ideological reasons israel moved long way right. obama resisting efforts drag us military action iran romney ryan eager. conditions success plan peace relationships leaders israel palestinians based trust confidence unlikely met anytime soon | ["israel"] | israel | 1 | 1 |
B de St Phalle | Yes, years ago Presidents Nixon, Carter and Bush I were able to buck the pro-Israel community and achieve breakthroughs. A lot has changed since then. The religious right backs Israel for ideological reasons and Israel itself has moved a long way to the right. Obama is resisting efforts to drag the US into military action against Iran but Romney/Ryan are eager for it. Your conditions for success, a plan for peace and relationships with the leaders of Israel and the Palestinians based on trust and confidence, are unlikely to be met anytime soon. | israel | A2192-P | israel | 0 | 3 | 7,933 | 6,949,048 | [["yes", "years", "ago", "presidents", "nixon", "carter", "bush", "able", "buck", "pro", "israel", "community", "achieve", "breakthroughs"], ["lot", "changed", "since"], ["religious", "right", "backs", "israel", "ideological", "reasons", "israel", "moved", "long", "way", "right"], ["obama", "resisting", "efforts", "drag", "us", "military", "action", "iran", "romney", "ryan", "eager"], ["conditions", "success", "plan", "peace", "relationships", "leaders", "israel", "palestinians", "based", "trust", "confidence", "unlikely", "met", "anytime", "soon"]] | [["UH", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "VBP", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBN", "IN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NNP", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "VBG", "NNS", "VB", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "JJ"], ["NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NNP", "NNPS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBN", "RB", "RB"]] | yes years ago presidents nixon carter bush able buck pro israel community achieve breakthroughs. lot changed since. religious right backs israel ideological reasons israel moved long way right. obama resisting efforts drag us military action iran romney ryan eager. conditions success plan peace relationships leaders israel palestinians based trust confidence unlikely met anytime soon | ["israel"] | israel | 1 | 1 |
B de St Phalle | Yes, years ago Presidents Nixon, Carter and Bush I were able to buck the pro-Israel community and achieve breakthroughs. A lot has changed since then. The religious right backs Israel for ideological reasons and Israel itself has moved a long way to the right. Obama is resisting efforts to drag the US into military action against Iran but Romney/Ryan are eager for it. Your conditions for success, a plan for peace and relationships with the leaders of Israel and the Palestinians based on trust and confidence, are unlikely to be met anytime soon. | israel | A2192-P | religious rights | 0 | 3 | 7,934 | 6,949,048 | [["yes", "years", "ago", "presidents", "nixon", "carter", "bush", "able", "buck", "pro", "israel", "community", "achieve", "breakthroughs"], ["lot", "changed", "since"], ["religious", "right", "backs", "israel", "ideological", "reasons", "israel", "moved", "long", "way", "right"], ["obama", "resisting", "efforts", "drag", "us", "military", "action", "iran", "romney", "ryan", "eager"], ["conditions", "success", "plan", "peace", "relationships", "leaders", "israel", "palestinians", "based", "trust", "confidence", "unlikely", "met", "anytime", "soon"]] | [["UH", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "VBP", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBN", "IN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NNP", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "VBG", "NNS", "VB", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "JJ"], ["NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NNP", "NNPS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBN", "RB", "RB"]] | yes years ago presidents nixon carter bush able buck pro israel community achieve breakthroughs. lot changed since. religious right backs israel ideological reasons israel moved long way right. obama resisting efforts drag us military action iran romney ryan eager. conditions success plan peace relationships leaders israel palestinians based trust confidence unlikely met anytime soon | ["religious", "right"] | religious right | 1 | 1 |
B de St Phalle | Yes, years ago Presidents Nixon, Carter and Bush I were able to buck the pro-Israel community and achieve breakthroughs. A lot has changed since then. The religious right backs Israel for ideological reasons and Israel itself has moved a long way to the right. Obama is resisting efforts to drag the US into military action against Iran but Romney/Ryan are eager for it. Your conditions for success, a plan for peace and relationships with the leaders of Israel and the Palestinians based on trust and confidence, are unlikely to be met anytime soon. | israel | A2192-P | israel | 2 | 2 | 7,935 | 6,949,048 | [["yes", "years", "ago", "presidents", "nixon", "carter", "bush", "able", "buck", "pro", "israel", "community", "achieve", "breakthroughs"], ["lot", "changed", "since"], ["religious", "right", "backs", "israel", "ideological", "reasons", "israel", "moved", "long", "way", "right"], ["obama", "resisting", "efforts", "drag", "us", "military", "action", "iran", "romney", "ryan", "eager"], ["conditions", "success", "plan", "peace", "relationships", "leaders", "israel", "palestinians", "based", "trust", "confidence", "unlikely", "met", "anytime", "soon"]] | [["UH", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "VBP", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBN", "IN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NNP", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "VBG", "NNS", "VB", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "JJ"], ["NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NNP", "NNPS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBN", "RB", "RB"]] | yes years ago presidents nixon carter bush able buck pro israel community achieve breakthroughs. lot changed since. religious right backs israel ideological reasons israel moved long way right. obama resisting efforts drag us military action iran romney ryan eager. conditions success plan peace relationships leaders israel palestinians based trust confidence unlikely met anytime soon | ["israel"] | israel | 1 | 1 |
B de St Phalle | Yes, years ago Presidents Nixon, Carter and Bush I were able to buck the pro-Israel community and achieve breakthroughs. A lot has changed since then. The religious right backs Israel for ideological reasons and Israel itself has moved a long way to the right. Obama is resisting efforts to drag the US into military action against Iran but Romney/Ryan are eager for it. Your conditions for success, a plan for peace and relationships with the leaders of Israel and the Palestinians based on trust and confidence, are unlikely to be met anytime soon. | israel | A2192-P | plan for peace | 2 | 3 | 7,936 | 6,949,048 | [["yes", "years", "ago", "presidents", "nixon", "carter", "bush", "able", "buck", "pro", "israel", "community", "achieve", "breakthroughs"], ["lot", "changed", "since"], ["religious", "right", "backs", "israel", "ideological", "reasons", "israel", "moved", "long", "way", "right"], ["obama", "resisting", "efforts", "drag", "us", "military", "action", "iran", "romney", "ryan", "eager"], ["conditions", "success", "plan", "peace", "relationships", "leaders", "israel", "palestinians", "based", "trust", "confidence", "unlikely", "met", "anytime", "soon"]] | [["UH", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "VBP", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBN", "IN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NNP", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "VBG", "NNS", "VB", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "JJ"], ["NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NNP", "NNPS", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VBN", "RB", "RB"]] | yes years ago presidents nixon carter bush able buck pro israel community achieve breakthroughs. lot changed since. religious right backs israel ideological reasons israel moved long way right. obama resisting efforts drag us military action iran romney ryan eager. conditions success plan peace relationships leaders israel palestinians based trust confidence unlikely met anytime soon | ["plan", "peace"] | plan peace | 1 | 1 |
Alex | This article is mainly about: (a) The health risks that the entire VEGAN population (both adults and children) face. (b) The health risks of feeding babies and children a VEGAN diet. (c) The health risks of feeding babies and children a VEGETARIAN diet. (d) The health risks that the entire VEGETARIAN population (both adults and children) face. The correct answer is (b). Some of these comments make wonder about the commenter's reading comprehension skills. Nina isn't saying that it's unhealthy to raise kids on a VEGETARIAN diet (i.e. one that includes eggs and dairy). Neither is she saying that adults should not be vegan due to health risks. She is saying that it's risky for BABIES AND CHILDREN to be fed a vegan diet. Why are so many people responding to this article with long-winded replies about how they became vegan as ADULTS and are enjoying the health benefits? And why are others citing healthy babies raised on VEGETARIAN food as a rebuttal to this article? What part of this do you not understand?!?! | veganism | A116-P | veganism | 0 | 1 | 8,698 | 6,023,354 | [["article", "mainly", "health", "risks", "entire", "vegan", "population", "adults", "children", "face"], ["b", "health", "risks", "feeding", "babies", "children", "vegan", "diet"], ["c", "health", "risks", "feeding", "babies", "children", "vegetarian", "diet"], ["health", "risks", "entire", "vegetarian", "population", "adults", "children", "face"], ["correct", "answer", "b"], ["comments", "make", "wonder", "commenter", "'s", "reading", "comprehension", "skills"], ["nina", "n't", "saying", "'s", "unhealthy", "raise", "kids", "vegetarian", "diet", "i.e."], ["one", "includes", "eggs", "dairy"], ["neither", "saying", "adults", "vegan", "due", "health", "risks"], ["saying", "'s", "risky", "babies", "children", "fed", "vegan", "diet"], ["many", "people", "responding", "article", "long", "winded", "replies", "became", "vegan", "adults", "enjoying", "health", "benefits"], ["others", "citing", "healthy", "babies", "raised", "vegetarian", "food", "rebuttal", "article"], ["part", "understand"]] | [["NN", "RB", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NN"], ["LS", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "NNP", "NN"], ["LS", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "NNP", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "POS", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "RB", "VBG", "VBZ", "JJ", "VB", "NNS", "NNP", "NN", "FW"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NNS", "NN"], ["CC", "VBG", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBG", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBD", "NN", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB"]] | article mainly health risks entire vegan population adults children face. b health risks feeding babies children vegan diet. c health risks feeding babies children vegetarian diet. health risks entire vegetarian population adults children face. correct answer b. comments make wonder commenter 's reading comprehension skills. nina n't saying 's unhealthy raise kids vegetarian diet i.e.. one includes eggs dairy. neither saying adults vegan due health risks. saying 's risky babies children fed vegan diet. many people responding article long winded replies became vegan adults enjoying health benefits. others citing healthy babies raised vegetarian food rebuttal article. part understand | ["veganism"] | veganism | 1 | 0 |
Alex | This article is mainly about: (a) The health risks that the entire VEGAN population (both adults and children) face. (b) The health risks of feeding babies and children a VEGAN diet. (c) The health risks of feeding babies and children a VEGETARIAN diet. (d) The health risks that the entire VEGETARIAN population (both adults and children) face. The correct answer is (b). Some of these comments make wonder about the commenter's reading comprehension skills. Nina isn't saying that it's unhealthy to raise kids on a VEGETARIAN diet (i.e. one that includes eggs and dairy). Neither is she saying that adults should not be vegan due to health risks. She is saying that it's risky for BABIES AND CHILDREN to be fed a vegan diet. Why are so many people responding to this article with long-winded replies about how they became vegan as ADULTS and are enjoying the health benefits? And why are others citing healthy babies raised on VEGETARIAN food as a rebuttal to this article? What part of this do you not understand?!?! | veganism | A116-P | veganism | 0 | 3 | 8,699 | 6,023,354 | [["article", "mainly", "health", "risks", "entire", "vegan", "population", "adults", "children", "face"], ["b", "health", "risks", "feeding", "babies", "children", "vegan", "diet"], ["c", "health", "risks", "feeding", "babies", "children", "vegetarian", "diet"], ["health", "risks", "entire", "vegetarian", "population", "adults", "children", "face"], ["correct", "answer", "b"], ["comments", "make", "wonder", "commenter", "'s", "reading", "comprehension", "skills"], ["nina", "n't", "saying", "'s", "unhealthy", "raise", "kids", "vegetarian", "diet", "i.e."], ["one", "includes", "eggs", "dairy"], ["neither", "saying", "adults", "vegan", "due", "health", "risks"], ["saying", "'s", "risky", "babies", "children", "fed", "vegan", "diet"], ["many", "people", "responding", "article", "long", "winded", "replies", "became", "vegan", "adults", "enjoying", "health", "benefits"], ["others", "citing", "healthy", "babies", "raised", "vegetarian", "food", "rebuttal", "article"], ["part", "understand"]] | [["NN", "RB", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NN"], ["LS", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "NNP", "NN"], ["LS", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "NNP", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "POS", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "RB", "VBG", "VBZ", "JJ", "VB", "NNS", "NNP", "NN", "FW"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NNS", "NN"], ["CC", "VBG", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBG", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBD", "NN", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB"]] | article mainly health risks entire vegan population adults children face. b health risks feeding babies children vegan diet. c health risks feeding babies children vegetarian diet. health risks entire vegetarian population adults children face. correct answer b. comments make wonder commenter 's reading comprehension skills. nina n't saying 's unhealthy raise kids vegetarian diet i.e.. one includes eggs dairy. neither saying adults vegan due health risks. saying 's risky babies children fed vegan diet. many people responding article long winded replies became vegan adults enjoying health benefits. others citing healthy babies raised vegetarian food rebuttal article. part understand | ["veganism"] | veganism | 1 | 0 |
Alex | This article is mainly about: (a) The health risks that the entire VEGAN population (both adults and children) face. (b) The health risks of feeding babies and children a VEGAN diet. (c) The health risks of feeding babies and children a VEGETARIAN diet. (d) The health risks that the entire VEGETARIAN population (both adults and children) face. The correct answer is (b). Some of these comments make wonder about the commenter's reading comprehension skills. Nina isn't saying that it's unhealthy to raise kids on a VEGETARIAN diet (i.e. one that includes eggs and dairy). Neither is she saying that adults should not be vegan due to health risks. She is saying that it's risky for BABIES AND CHILDREN to be fed a vegan diet. Why are so many people responding to this article with long-winded replies about how they became vegan as ADULTS and are enjoying the health benefits? And why are others citing healthy babies raised on VEGETARIAN food as a rebuttal to this article? What part of this do you not understand?!?! | veganism | A116-P | vegan diet | 1 | 3 | 8,700 | 6,023,354 | [["article", "mainly", "health", "risks", "entire", "vegan", "population", "adults", "children", "face"], ["b", "health", "risks", "feeding", "babies", "children", "vegan", "diet"], ["c", "health", "risks", "feeding", "babies", "children", "vegetarian", "diet"], ["health", "risks", "entire", "vegetarian", "population", "adults", "children", "face"], ["correct", "answer", "b"], ["comments", "make", "wonder", "commenter", "'s", "reading", "comprehension", "skills"], ["nina", "n't", "saying", "'s", "unhealthy", "raise", "kids", "vegetarian", "diet", "i.e."], ["one", "includes", "eggs", "dairy"], ["neither", "saying", "adults", "vegan", "due", "health", "risks"], ["saying", "'s", "risky", "babies", "children", "fed", "vegan", "diet"], ["many", "people", "responding", "article", "long", "winded", "replies", "became", "vegan", "adults", "enjoying", "health", "benefits"], ["others", "citing", "healthy", "babies", "raised", "vegetarian", "food", "rebuttal", "article"], ["part", "understand"]] | [["NN", "RB", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NN"], ["LS", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "NNP", "NN"], ["LS", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "NNP", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "POS", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "RB", "VBG", "VBZ", "JJ", "VB", "NNS", "NNP", "NN", "FW"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NNS", "NN"], ["CC", "VBG", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBG", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBD", "NN", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "VB"]] | article mainly health risks entire vegan population adults children face. b health risks feeding babies children vegan diet. c health risks feeding babies children vegetarian diet. health risks entire vegetarian population adults children face. correct answer b. comments make wonder commenter 's reading comprehension skills. nina n't saying 's unhealthy raise kids vegetarian diet i.e.. one includes eggs dairy. neither saying adults vegan due health risks. saying 's risky babies children fed vegan diet. many people responding article long winded replies became vegan adults enjoying health benefits. others citing healthy babies raised vegetarian food rebuttal article. part understand | ["vegan", "diet"] | vegan diet | 1 | 1 |
deanmblake | I didn't see any Muslim outcry when Muslims burned Bibles and Torah scrolls (at $35,000 @) and burnt down a religious snactuary, and murdered a guard in cold blood at the Tomb of Joseph, a holy site for Jews. Muslims are sensitive to their own beliefs and values, but seemingly have no respect whatsoever for anyone else's religion or beliefs. You get what you give. You don't give respect to others, not even lip service you don't get any respect. | speech | A1119-P | speech | 0 | 1 | 1,398 | 2,566,340 | [["n't", "see", "muslim", "outcry", "muslims", "burned", "bibles", "torah", "scrolls", "35,000", "burnt", "religious", "snactuary", "murdered", "guard", "cold", "blood", "tomb", "joseph", "holy", "site", "jews"], ["muslims", "sensitive", "beliefs", "values", "seemingly", "respect", "whatsoever", "anyone", "else", "'s", "religion", "beliefs"], ["get", "give"], ["n't", "give", "respect", "others", "even", "lip", "service", "n't", "get", "respect"]] | [["RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNPS", "VBD", "NNPS", "NNP", "NNS", "CD", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NNPS"], ["NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "RB", "NN", "RB", "POS", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "VBP"], ["RB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "VB", "NN"]] | n't see muslim outcry muslims burned bibles torah scrolls 35,000 burnt religious snactuary murdered guard cold blood tomb joseph holy site jews. muslims sensitive beliefs values seemingly respect whatsoever anyone else 's religion beliefs. get give. n't give respect others even lip service n't get respect | ["speech"] | speech | 1 | 0 |
deanmblake | I didn't see any Muslim outcry when Muslims burned Bibles and Torah scrolls (at $35,000 @) and burnt down a religious snactuary, and murdered a guard in cold blood at the Tomb of Joseph, a holy site for Jews. Muslims are sensitive to their own beliefs and values, but seemingly have no respect whatsoever for anyone else's religion or beliefs. You get what you give. You don't give respect to others, not even lip service you don't get any respect. | speech | A1119-P | muslim selfishness | 0 | 3 | 1,399 | 2,566,340 | [["n't", "see", "muslim", "outcry", "muslims", "burned", "bibles", "torah", "scrolls", "35,000", "burnt", "religious", "snactuary", "murdered", "guard", "cold", "blood", "tomb", "joseph", "holy", "site", "jews"], ["muslims", "sensitive", "beliefs", "values", "seemingly", "respect", "whatsoever", "anyone", "else", "'s", "religion", "beliefs"], ["get", "give"], ["n't", "give", "respect", "others", "even", "lip", "service", "n't", "get", "respect"]] | [["RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNPS", "VBD", "NNPS", "NNP", "NNS", "CD", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NNPS"], ["NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "RB", "NN", "RB", "POS", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "VBP"], ["RB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "VB", "NN"]] | n't see muslim outcry muslims burned bibles torah scrolls 35,000 burnt religious snactuary murdered guard cold blood tomb joseph holy site jews. muslims sensitive beliefs values seemingly respect whatsoever anyone else 's religion beliefs. get give. n't give respect others even lip service n't get respect | ["muslim", "selfishness"] | muslim selfishness | 1 | 0 |
deanmblake | I didn't see any Muslim outcry when Muslims burned Bibles and Torah scrolls (at $35,000 @) and burnt down a religious snactuary, and murdered a guard in cold blood at the Tomb of Joseph, a holy site for Jews. Muslims are sensitive to their own beliefs and values, but seemingly have no respect whatsoever for anyone else's religion or beliefs. You get what you give. You don't give respect to others, not even lip service you don't get any respect. | speech | A1119-P | islam | 0 | 2 | 1,400 | 2,566,340 | [["n't", "see", "muslim", "outcry", "muslims", "burned", "bibles", "torah", "scrolls", "35,000", "burnt", "religious", "snactuary", "murdered", "guard", "cold", "blood", "tomb", "joseph", "holy", "site", "jews"], ["muslims", "sensitive", "beliefs", "values", "seemingly", "respect", "whatsoever", "anyone", "else", "'s", "religion", "beliefs"], ["get", "give"], ["n't", "give", "respect", "others", "even", "lip", "service", "n't", "get", "respect"]] | [["RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNPS", "VBD", "NNPS", "NNP", "NNS", "CD", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "NNPS"], ["NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "RB", "NN", "RB", "POS", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "VBP"], ["RB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "VB", "NN"]] | n't see muslim outcry muslims burned bibles torah scrolls 35,000 burnt religious snactuary murdered guard cold blood tomb joseph holy site jews. muslims sensitive beliefs values seemingly respect whatsoever anyone else 's religion beliefs. get give. n't give respect others even lip service n't get respect | ["islam"] | islam | 1 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.