author
string
post
string
ori_topic
string
ori_id
string
new_topic
string
label
int64
type_idx
int64
new_id
int64
arc_id
int64
text
string
pos_text
string
text_s
string
topic
string
topic_str
string
seen?
int64
contains_topic?
int64
mike
Classic Bayesian inference error. If A then B is not equivalent to if B then A. But it worked for Johnny Cochran in the OJ Simpson trial, who (correctly) argued that the percentage of verified wife beaters who go on to murder their wives is very, very small, but also ignored the fact that the percentage of verified wife beaters whose wives are then murdered and who are guilty approaches 100%.
a gateway drug
A3838-P
bayesian inference
0
3
6,103
18,336,951
[["classic", "bayesian", "inference", "error"], ["b", "equivalent", "b", "a."], ["worked", "johnny", "cochran", "oj", "simpson", "trial", "correctly", "argued", "percentage", "verified", "wife", "beaters", "go", "murder", "wives", "small", "also", "ignored", "fact", "percentage", "verified", "wife", "beaters", "whose", "wives", "murdered", "guilty", "approaches", "100"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBD", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "RB", "VBD", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "WP$", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS", "CD"]]
classic bayesian inference error. b equivalent b a.. worked johnny cochran oj simpson trial correctly argued percentage verified wife beaters go murder wives small also ignored fact percentage verified wife beaters whose wives murdered guilty approaches 100
["bayesian", "inference"]
bayesian inference
1
1
mike
Classic Bayesian inference error. If A then B is not equivalent to if B then A. But it worked for Johnny Cochran in the OJ Simpson trial, who (correctly) argued that the percentage of verified wife beaters who go on to murder their wives is very, very small, but also ignored the fact that the percentage of verified wife beaters whose wives are then murdered and who are guilty approaches 100%.
a gateway drug
A3838-P
oj simpson trial
2
3
6,104
18,336,951
[["classic", "bayesian", "inference", "error"], ["b", "equivalent", "b", "a."], ["worked", "johnny", "cochran", "oj", "simpson", "trial", "correctly", "argued", "percentage", "verified", "wife", "beaters", "go", "murder", "wives", "small", "also", "ignored", "fact", "percentage", "verified", "wife", "beaters", "whose", "wives", "murdered", "guilty", "approaches", "100"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "NNP", "NN"], ["VBD", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "RB", "VBD", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "WP$", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS", "CD"]]
classic bayesian inference error. b equivalent b a.. worked johnny cochran oj simpson trial correctly argued percentage verified wife beaters go murder wives small also ignored fact percentage verified wife beaters whose wives murdered guilty approaches 100
["oj", "simpson", "trial"]
oj simpson trial
1
1
daniel almenares chacon
I'm deeply concerned but not amazed of the comments of Mr. Montaner. So far Cuba is no longer in the Soviet Union orbit and there's a lot of change in the government's behavior since Fidel Castro is no longer in front of the executive of the Comunist Party. I think Mr. Montaner should pay more attention to the latest polls in the UN against the embargo, the solidarity of the cuban doctors, and the progress and investments a lot of countries are taking inside the island, if america doesn't take this chance to lift the embargo he will pass thru history once again as the could-have-done but-never-did disappointing administration of Mr. Obama.
the u.s.
A762-P
the u.s.
0
1
2,770
13,044,921
[["'m", "deeply", "concerned", "amazed", "comments", "mr.", "montaner"], ["far", "cuba", "longer", "soviet", "union", "orbit", "'s", "lot", "change", "government", "'s", "behavior", "since", "fidel", "castro", "longer", "front", "executive", "comunist", "party"], ["think", "mr.", "montaner", "pay", "attention", "latest", "polls", "un", "embargo", "solidarity", "cuban", "doctors", "progress", "investments", "lot", "countries", "taking", "inside", "island", "america", "n't", "take", "chance", "lift", "embargo", "pass", "thru", "history", "could", "done", "never", "disappointing", "administration", "mr.", "obama"]]
[["VBP", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["RB", "NNP", "RBR", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "NN", "IN", "NNP", "NNP", "RBR", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "NN", "JJS", "NNS", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "RB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "IN", "NN", "MD", "VBN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP"]]
'm deeply concerned amazed comments mr. montaner. far cuba longer soviet union orbit 's lot change government 's behavior since fidel castro longer front executive comunist party. think mr. montaner pay attention latest polls un embargo solidarity cuban doctors progress investments lot countries taking inside island america n't take chance lift embargo pass thru history could done never disappointing administration mr. obama
["u.s"]
u.s
1
0
daniel almenares chacon
I'm deeply concerned but not amazed of the comments of Mr. Montaner. So far Cuba is no longer in the Soviet Union orbit and there's a lot of change in the government's behavior since Fidel Castro is no longer in front of the executive of the Comunist Party. I think Mr. Montaner should pay more attention to the latest polls in the UN against the embargo, the solidarity of the cuban doctors, and the progress and investments a lot of countries are taking inside the island, if america doesn't take this chance to lift the embargo he will pass thru history once again as the could-have-done but-never-did disappointing administration of Mr. Obama.
the u.s.
A762-P
politics
1
3
2,771
13,044,921
[["'m", "deeply", "concerned", "amazed", "comments", "mr.", "montaner"], ["far", "cuba", "longer", "soviet", "union", "orbit", "'s", "lot", "change", "government", "'s", "behavior", "since", "fidel", "castro", "longer", "front", "executive", "comunist", "party"], ["think", "mr.", "montaner", "pay", "attention", "latest", "polls", "un", "embargo", "solidarity", "cuban", "doctors", "progress", "investments", "lot", "countries", "taking", "inside", "island", "america", "n't", "take", "chance", "lift", "embargo", "pass", "thru", "history", "could", "done", "never", "disappointing", "administration", "mr.", "obama"]]
[["VBP", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["RB", "NNP", "RBR", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "NN", "IN", "NNP", "NNP", "RBR", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "NN", "JJS", "NNS", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "RB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "IN", "NN", "MD", "VBN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP"]]
'm deeply concerned amazed comments mr. montaner. far cuba longer soviet union orbit 's lot change government 's behavior since fidel castro longer front executive comunist party. think mr. montaner pay attention latest polls un embargo solidarity cuban doctors progress investments lot countries taking inside island america n't take chance lift embargo pass thru history could done never disappointing administration mr. obama
["politics"]
politics
1
0
daniel almenares chacon
I'm deeply concerned but not amazed of the comments of Mr. Montaner. So far Cuba is no longer in the Soviet Union orbit and there's a lot of change in the government's behavior since Fidel Castro is no longer in front of the executive of the Comunist Party. I think Mr. Montaner should pay more attention to the latest polls in the UN against the embargo, the solidarity of the cuban doctors, and the progress and investments a lot of countries are taking inside the island, if america doesn't take this chance to lift the embargo he will pass thru history once again as the could-have-done but-never-did disappointing administration of Mr. Obama.
the u.s.
A762-P
cuba embargo
0
3
2,772
13,044,921
[["'m", "deeply", "concerned", "amazed", "comments", "mr.", "montaner"], ["far", "cuba", "longer", "soviet", "union", "orbit", "'s", "lot", "change", "government", "'s", "behavior", "since", "fidel", "castro", "longer", "front", "executive", "comunist", "party"], ["think", "mr.", "montaner", "pay", "attention", "latest", "polls", "un", "embargo", "solidarity", "cuban", "doctors", "progress", "investments", "lot", "countries", "taking", "inside", "island", "america", "n't", "take", "chance", "lift", "embargo", "pass", "thru", "history", "could", "done", "never", "disappointing", "administration", "mr.", "obama"]]
[["VBP", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["RB", "NNP", "RBR", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "NN", "IN", "NNP", "NNP", "RBR", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "NN", "JJS", "NNS", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "RB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "IN", "NN", "MD", "VBN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP"]]
'm deeply concerned amazed comments mr. montaner. far cuba longer soviet union orbit 's lot change government 's behavior since fidel castro longer front executive comunist party. think mr. montaner pay attention latest polls un embargo solidarity cuban doctors progress investments lot countries taking inside island america n't take chance lift embargo pass thru history could done never disappointing administration mr. obama
["cuba", "embargo"]
cuba embargo
1
0
daniel almenares chacon
I'm deeply concerned but not amazed of the comments of Mr. Montaner. So far Cuba is no longer in the Soviet Union orbit and there's a lot of change in the government's behavior since Fidel Castro is no longer in front of the executive of the Comunist Party. I think Mr. Montaner should pay more attention to the latest polls in the UN against the embargo, the solidarity of the cuban doctors, and the progress and investments a lot of countries are taking inside the island, if america doesn't take this chance to lift the embargo he will pass thru history once again as the could-have-done but-never-did disappointing administration of Mr. Obama.
sanctions
A763-P
sanctions
0
1
2,779
13,044,921
[["'m", "deeply", "concerned", "amazed", "comments", "mr.", "montaner"], ["far", "cuba", "longer", "soviet", "union", "orbit", "'s", "lot", "change", "government", "'s", "behavior", "since", "fidel", "castro", "longer", "front", "executive", "comunist", "party"], ["think", "mr.", "montaner", "pay", "attention", "latest", "polls", "un", "embargo", "solidarity", "cuban", "doctors", "progress", "investments", "lot", "countries", "taking", "inside", "island", "america", "n't", "take", "chance", "lift", "embargo", "pass", "thru", "history", "could", "done", "never", "disappointing", "administration", "mr.", "obama"]]
[["VBP", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["RB", "NNP", "RBR", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "NN", "IN", "NNP", "NNP", "RBR", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "NN", "JJS", "NNS", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "RB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "IN", "NN", "MD", "VBN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP"]]
'm deeply concerned amazed comments mr. montaner. far cuba longer soviet union orbit 's lot change government 's behavior since fidel castro longer front executive comunist party. think mr. montaner pay attention latest polls un embargo solidarity cuban doctors progress investments lot countries taking inside island america n't take chance lift embargo pass thru history could done never disappointing administration mr. obama
["sanction"]
sanction
1
0
daniel almenares chacon
I'm deeply concerned but not amazed of the comments of Mr. Montaner. So far Cuba is no longer in the Soviet Union orbit and there's a lot of change in the government's behavior since Fidel Castro is no longer in front of the executive of the Comunist Party. I think Mr. Montaner should pay more attention to the latest polls in the UN against the embargo, the solidarity of the cuban doctors, and the progress and investments a lot of countries are taking inside the island, if america doesn't take this chance to lift the embargo he will pass thru history once again as the could-have-done but-never-did disappointing administration of Mr. Obama.
sanctions
A763-P
cuba
0
3
2,780
13,044,921
[["'m", "deeply", "concerned", "amazed", "comments", "mr.", "montaner"], ["far", "cuba", "longer", "soviet", "union", "orbit", "'s", "lot", "change", "government", "'s", "behavior", "since", "fidel", "castro", "longer", "front", "executive", "comunist", "party"], ["think", "mr.", "montaner", "pay", "attention", "latest", "polls", "un", "embargo", "solidarity", "cuban", "doctors", "progress", "investments", "lot", "countries", "taking", "inside", "island", "america", "n't", "take", "chance", "lift", "embargo", "pass", "thru", "history", "could", "done", "never", "disappointing", "administration", "mr.", "obama"]]
[["VBP", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["RB", "NNP", "RBR", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "NN", "IN", "NNP", "NNP", "RBR", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "NN", "JJS", "NNS", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "RB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "IN", "NN", "MD", "VBN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP"]]
'm deeply concerned amazed comments mr. montaner. far cuba longer soviet union orbit 's lot change government 's behavior since fidel castro longer front executive comunist party. think mr. montaner pay attention latest polls un embargo solidarity cuban doctors progress investments lot countries taking inside island america n't take chance lift embargo pass thru history could done never disappointing administration mr. obama
["cuba"]
cuba
1
1
daniel almenares chacon
I'm deeply concerned but not amazed of the comments of Mr. Montaner. So far Cuba is no longer in the Soviet Union orbit and there's a lot of change in the government's behavior since Fidel Castro is no longer in front of the executive of the Comunist Party. I think Mr. Montaner should pay more attention to the latest polls in the UN against the embargo, the solidarity of the cuban doctors, and the progress and investments a lot of countries are taking inside the island, if america doesn't take this chance to lift the embargo he will pass thru history once again as the could-have-done but-never-did disappointing administration of Mr. Obama.
sanctions
A763-P
cuba-us relations
0
3
2,781
13,044,921
[["'m", "deeply", "concerned", "amazed", "comments", "mr.", "montaner"], ["far", "cuba", "longer", "soviet", "union", "orbit", "'s", "lot", "change", "government", "'s", "behavior", "since", "fidel", "castro", "longer", "front", "executive", "comunist", "party"], ["think", "mr.", "montaner", "pay", "attention", "latest", "polls", "un", "embargo", "solidarity", "cuban", "doctors", "progress", "investments", "lot", "countries", "taking", "inside", "island", "america", "n't", "take", "chance", "lift", "embargo", "pass", "thru", "history", "could", "done", "never", "disappointing", "administration", "mr.", "obama"]]
[["VBP", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP"], ["RB", "NNP", "RBR", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "NN", "IN", "NNP", "NNP", "RBR", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NNP"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "NN", "JJS", "NNS", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "RB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "IN", "NN", "MD", "VBN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NNP"]]
'm deeply concerned amazed comments mr. montaner. far cuba longer soviet union orbit 's lot change government 's behavior since fidel castro longer front executive comunist party. think mr. montaner pay attention latest polls un embargo solidarity cuban doctors progress investments lot countries taking inside island america n't take chance lift embargo pass thru history could done never disappointing administration mr. obama
["cuban", "relation"]
cuban relation
1
0
Ronald Beckman
Ms. Maryann Keller has no awareness of social accounting. Her logic is based solely on a dollars and cents, profit and loss mentality. If she would factor in the savings in health costs from pollution eliminated and political advantage from elimination of middle east oil dependence perhaps she might see the light.
electric cars
A3894-P
electric cars
1
1
8,044
2,657,466
[["ms.", "maryann", "keller", "awareness", "social", "accounting"], ["logic", "based", "solely", "dollars", "cents", "profit", "loss", "mentality"], ["would", "factor", "savings", "health", "costs", "pollution", "eliminated", "political", "advantage", "elimination", "middle", "east", "oil", "dependence", "perhaps", "might", "see", "light"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "MD", "VB", "NN"]]
ms. maryann keller awareness social accounting. logic based solely dollars cents profit loss mentality. would factor savings health costs pollution eliminated political advantage elimination middle east oil dependence perhaps might see light
["electric", "car"]
electric car
1
0
Ronald Beckman
Ms. Maryann Keller has no awareness of social accounting. Her logic is based solely on a dollars and cents, profit and loss mentality. If she would factor in the savings in health costs from pollution eliminated and political advantage from elimination of middle east oil dependence perhaps she might see the light.
electric cars
A3894-P
environmental policy
1
3
8,045
2,657,466
[["ms.", "maryann", "keller", "awareness", "social", "accounting"], ["logic", "based", "solely", "dollars", "cents", "profit", "loss", "mentality"], ["would", "factor", "savings", "health", "costs", "pollution", "eliminated", "political", "advantage", "elimination", "middle", "east", "oil", "dependence", "perhaps", "might", "see", "light"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "MD", "VB", "NN"]]
ms. maryann keller awareness social accounting. logic based solely dollars cents profit loss mentality. would factor savings health costs pollution eliminated political advantage elimination middle east oil dependence perhaps might see light
["environmental", "policy"]
environmental policy
1
0
Ronald Beckman
Ms. Maryann Keller has no awareness of social accounting. Her logic is based solely on a dollars and cents, profit and loss mentality. If she would factor in the savings in health costs from pollution eliminated and political advantage from elimination of middle east oil dependence perhaps she might see the light.
electric cars
A3894-P
oil dependence
0
2
8,046
2,657,466
[["ms.", "maryann", "keller", "awareness", "social", "accounting"], ["logic", "based", "solely", "dollars", "cents", "profit", "loss", "mentality"], ["would", "factor", "savings", "health", "costs", "pollution", "eliminated", "political", "advantage", "elimination", "middle", "east", "oil", "dependence", "perhaps", "might", "see", "light"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "MD", "VB", "NN"]]
ms. maryann keller awareness social accounting. logic based solely dollars cents profit loss mentality. would factor savings health costs pollution eliminated political advantage elimination middle east oil dependence perhaps might see light
["oil", "dependence"]
oil dependence
1
1
Ronald Beckman
Ms. Maryann Keller has no awareness of social accounting. Her logic is based solely on a dollars and cents, profit and loss mentality. If she would factor in the savings in health costs from pollution eliminated and political advantage from elimination of middle east oil dependence perhaps she might see the light.
electric cars
A3894-P
health cost
0
2
8,047
2,657,466
[["ms.", "maryann", "keller", "awareness", "social", "accounting"], ["logic", "based", "solely", "dollars", "cents", "profit", "loss", "mentality"], ["would", "factor", "savings", "health", "costs", "pollution", "eliminated", "political", "advantage", "elimination", "middle", "east", "oil", "dependence", "perhaps", "might", "see", "light"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "MD", "VB", "NN"]]
ms. maryann keller awareness social accounting. logic based solely dollars cents profit loss mentality. would factor savings health costs pollution eliminated political advantage elimination middle east oil dependence perhaps might see light
["health", "cost"]
health cost
1
1
Ronald Beckman
Ms. Maryann Keller has no awareness of social accounting. Her logic is based solely on a dollars and cents, profit and loss mentality. If she would factor in the savings in health costs from pollution eliminated and political advantage from elimination of middle east oil dependence perhaps she might see the light.
electric cars
A3894-P
social accounting
0
3
8,048
2,657,466
[["ms.", "maryann", "keller", "awareness", "social", "accounting"], ["logic", "based", "solely", "dollars", "cents", "profit", "loss", "mentality"], ["would", "factor", "savings", "health", "costs", "pollution", "eliminated", "political", "advantage", "elimination", "middle", "east", "oil", "dependence", "perhaps", "might", "see", "light"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "MD", "VB", "NN"]]
ms. maryann keller awareness social accounting. logic based solely dollars cents profit loss mentality. would factor savings health costs pollution eliminated political advantage elimination middle east oil dependence perhaps might see light
["social", "accounting"]
social accounting
1
1
Ronald Beckman
Ms. Maryann Keller has no awareness of social accounting. Her logic is based solely on a dollars and cents, profit and loss mentality. If she would factor in the savings in health costs from pollution eliminated and political advantage from elimination of middle east oil dependence perhaps she might see the light.
electric cars
A3894-P
middle east oil
0
3
8,049
2,657,466
[["ms.", "maryann", "keller", "awareness", "social", "accounting"], ["logic", "based", "solely", "dollars", "cents", "profit", "loss", "mentality"], ["would", "factor", "savings", "health", "costs", "pollution", "eliminated", "political", "advantage", "elimination", "middle", "east", "oil", "dependence", "perhaps", "might", "see", "light"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "MD", "VB", "NN"]]
ms. maryann keller awareness social accounting. logic based solely dollars cents profit loss mentality. would factor savings health costs pollution eliminated political advantage elimination middle east oil dependence perhaps might see light
["middle", "east", "oil"]
middle east oil
1
1
Eric Herot
I'm amazed that so many of the comments on this piece seem to be comparing the usefulness of cursive to other forms of handwriting. I think this ignores the larger point, which is that hand-written print is largely dead outside of school. Any significant time spent learning or practicing handwriting instead of, say, critical thinking skills or grammatical structure is wasted in my opinion. Today's students are not going to write on the job. They're going to use a computer. And if anything we should be spending *more* time teaching them to use said computer instead of learning how to write things long hand--a skill which they will never use.
students
A3695-P
computer education
1
2
10,179
8,891,582
[["'m", "amazed", "many", "comments", "piece", "seem", "comparing", "usefulness", "cursive", "forms", "handwriting"], ["think", "ignores", "larger", "point", "hand", "written", "print", "largely", "dead", "outside", "school"], ["significant", "time", "spent", "learning", "practicing", "handwriting", "instead", "say", "critical", "thinking", "skills", "grammatical", "structure", "wasted", "opinion"], ["today", "'s", "students", "going", "write", "job"], ["'re", "going", "use", "computer"], ["anything", "spending", "time", "teaching", "use", "said", "computer", "instead", "learning", "write", "things", "long", "hand", "--", "skill", "never", "use"]]
[["VBP", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["VBP", "VBZ", "JJR", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "RB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBG", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "UH", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "POS", "NNS", "VBG", "VB", "NN"], ["VBP", "VBG", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "VBD", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", ":", "NN", "RB", "VB"]]
'm amazed many comments piece seem comparing usefulness cursive forms handwriting. think ignores larger point hand written print largely dead outside school. significant time spent learning practicing handwriting instead say critical thinking skills grammatical structure wasted opinion. today 's students going write job. 're going use computer. anything spending time teaching use said computer instead learning write things long hand -- skill never use
["computer", "education"]
computer education
1
0
Eric Herot
I'm amazed that so many of the comments on this piece seem to be comparing the usefulness of cursive to other forms of handwriting. I think this ignores the larger point, which is that hand-written print is largely dead outside of school. Any significant time spent learning or practicing handwriting instead of, say, critical thinking skills or grammatical structure is wasted in my opinion. Today's students are not going to write on the job. They're going to use a computer. And if anything we should be spending *more* time teaching them to use said computer instead of learning how to write things long hand--a skill which they will never use.
students
A3695-P
hand-written print and cursive
0
2
10,180
8,891,582
[["'m", "amazed", "many", "comments", "piece", "seem", "comparing", "usefulness", "cursive", "forms", "handwriting"], ["think", "ignores", "larger", "point", "hand", "written", "print", "largely", "dead", "outside", "school"], ["significant", "time", "spent", "learning", "practicing", "handwriting", "instead", "say", "critical", "thinking", "skills", "grammatical", "structure", "wasted", "opinion"], ["today", "'s", "students", "going", "write", "job"], ["'re", "going", "use", "computer"], ["anything", "spending", "time", "teaching", "use", "said", "computer", "instead", "learning", "write", "things", "long", "hand", "--", "skill", "never", "use"]]
[["VBP", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["VBP", "VBZ", "JJR", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "RB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBG", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "UH", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "POS", "NNS", "VBG", "VB", "NN"], ["VBP", "VBG", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "VBD", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", ":", "NN", "RB", "VB"]]
'm amazed many comments piece seem comparing usefulness cursive forms handwriting. think ignores larger point hand written print largely dead outside school. significant time spent learning practicing handwriting instead say critical thinking skills grammatical structure wasted opinion. today 's students going write job. 're going use computer. anything spending time teaching use said computer instead learning write things long hand -- skill never use
["handwritten", "print", "cursive"]
handwritten print cursive
1
0
Eric Herot
I'm amazed that so many of the comments on this piece seem to be comparing the usefulness of cursive to other forms of handwriting. I think this ignores the larger point, which is that hand-written print is largely dead outside of school. Any significant time spent learning or practicing handwriting instead of, say, critical thinking skills or grammatical structure is wasted in my opinion. Today's students are not going to write on the job. They're going to use a computer. And if anything we should be spending *more* time teaching them to use said computer instead of learning how to write things long hand--a skill which they will never use.
students
A3695-P
cursive
1
3
10,181
8,891,582
[["'m", "amazed", "many", "comments", "piece", "seem", "comparing", "usefulness", "cursive", "forms", "handwriting"], ["think", "ignores", "larger", "point", "hand", "written", "print", "largely", "dead", "outside", "school"], ["significant", "time", "spent", "learning", "practicing", "handwriting", "instead", "say", "critical", "thinking", "skills", "grammatical", "structure", "wasted", "opinion"], ["today", "'s", "students", "going", "write", "job"], ["'re", "going", "use", "computer"], ["anything", "spending", "time", "teaching", "use", "said", "computer", "instead", "learning", "write", "things", "long", "hand", "--", "skill", "never", "use"]]
[["VBP", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["VBP", "VBZ", "JJR", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "RB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBG", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "UH", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "POS", "NNS", "VBG", "VB", "NN"], ["VBP", "VBG", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "VBD", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", ":", "NN", "RB", "VB"]]
'm amazed many comments piece seem comparing usefulness cursive forms handwriting. think ignores larger point hand written print largely dead outside school. significant time spent learning practicing handwriting instead say critical thinking skills grammatical structure wasted opinion. today 's students going write job. 're going use computer. anything spending time teaching use said computer instead learning write things long hand -- skill never use
["cursive"]
cursive
1
1
Eric Herot
I'm amazed that so many of the comments on this piece seem to be comparing the usefulness of cursive to other forms of handwriting. I think this ignores the larger point, which is that hand-written print is largely dead outside of school. Any significant time spent learning or practicing handwriting instead of, say, critical thinking skills or grammatical structure is wasted in my opinion. Today's students are not going to write on the job. They're going to use a computer. And if anything we should be spending *more* time teaching them to use said computer instead of learning how to write things long hand--a skill which they will never use.
students
A3695-P
cursive handwriting
0
3
10,182
8,891,582
[["'m", "amazed", "many", "comments", "piece", "seem", "comparing", "usefulness", "cursive", "forms", "handwriting"], ["think", "ignores", "larger", "point", "hand", "written", "print", "largely", "dead", "outside", "school"], ["significant", "time", "spent", "learning", "practicing", "handwriting", "instead", "say", "critical", "thinking", "skills", "grammatical", "structure", "wasted", "opinion"], ["today", "'s", "students", "going", "write", "job"], ["'re", "going", "use", "computer"], ["anything", "spending", "time", "teaching", "use", "said", "computer", "instead", "learning", "write", "things", "long", "hand", "--", "skill", "never", "use"]]
[["VBP", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["VBP", "VBZ", "JJR", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "RB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBG", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "UH", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "POS", "NNS", "VBG", "VB", "NN"], ["VBP", "VBG", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "VBD", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", ":", "NN", "RB", "VB"]]
'm amazed many comments piece seem comparing usefulness cursive forms handwriting. think ignores larger point hand written print largely dead outside school. significant time spent learning practicing handwriting instead say critical thinking skills grammatical structure wasted opinion. today 's students going write job. 're going use computer. anything spending time teaching use said computer instead learning write things long hand -- skill never use
["cursive", "handwriting"]
cursive handwriting
1
0
Deus02
How ironic in which for decades now companies have been moving their manufacturing to low wage off shore locations to boost their profits yet they feel it necessary to attempt to legally inhibit an employee from moving on to a a better opportunity with another organization? Quite laughable when you think China, in particular, has paid little attention to patent rights and intellectual property, let alone their ongoing attempted hacking of American corporate secrets, yet, these companies remain there. If a company insisted on me signing such a questionable agreement, it is time to look elsewhere. The hypocrisy here is beyond the pale.
noncompete deals
A3967-P
noncompete deals
0
1
12,071
12,004,552
[["ironic", "decades", "companies", "moving", "manufacturing", "low", "wage", "shore", "locations", "boost", "profits", "yet", "feel", "necessary", "attempt", "legally", "inhibit", "employee", "moving", "better", "opportunity", "another", "organization"], ["quite", "laughable", "think", "china", "particular", "paid", "little", "attention", "patent", "rights", "intellectual", "property", "let", "alone", "ongoing", "attempted", "hacking", "american", "corporate", "secrets", "yet", "companies", "remain"], ["company", "insisted", "signing", "questionable", "agreement", "time", "look", "elsewhere"], ["hypocrisy", "beyond", "pale"]]
[["JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "CC", "VBP", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "JJR", "NN", "DT", "NN"], ["JJ", "JJ", "VBP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "VBP"], ["NN", "VBD", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "IN", "NN"]]
ironic decades companies moving manufacturing low wage shore locations boost profits yet feel necessary attempt legally inhibit employee moving better opportunity another organization. quite laughable think china particular paid little attention patent rights intellectual property let alone ongoing attempted hacking american corporate secrets yet companies remain. company insisted signing questionable agreement time look elsewhere. hypocrisy beyond pale
["noncompete", "deal"]
noncompete deal
1
0
Deus02
How ironic in which for decades now companies have been moving their manufacturing to low wage off shore locations to boost their profits yet they feel it necessary to attempt to legally inhibit an employee from moving on to a a better opportunity with another organization? Quite laughable when you think China, in particular, has paid little attention to patent rights and intellectual property, let alone their ongoing attempted hacking of American corporate secrets, yet, these companies remain there. If a company insisted on me signing such a questionable agreement, it is time to look elsewhere. The hypocrisy here is beyond the pale.
noncompete deals
A3967-P
overseas manufacturing
0
3
12,072
12,004,552
[["ironic", "decades", "companies", "moving", "manufacturing", "low", "wage", "shore", "locations", "boost", "profits", "yet", "feel", "necessary", "attempt", "legally", "inhibit", "employee", "moving", "better", "opportunity", "another", "organization"], ["quite", "laughable", "think", "china", "particular", "paid", "little", "attention", "patent", "rights", "intellectual", "property", "let", "alone", "ongoing", "attempted", "hacking", "american", "corporate", "secrets", "yet", "companies", "remain"], ["company", "insisted", "signing", "questionable", "agreement", "time", "look", "elsewhere"], ["hypocrisy", "beyond", "pale"]]
[["JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "CC", "VBP", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "JJR", "NN", "DT", "NN"], ["JJ", "JJ", "VBP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "VBP"], ["NN", "VBD", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "IN", "NN"]]
ironic decades companies moving manufacturing low wage shore locations boost profits yet feel necessary attempt legally inhibit employee moving better opportunity another organization. quite laughable think china particular paid little attention patent rights intellectual property let alone ongoing attempted hacking american corporate secrets yet companies remain. company insisted signing questionable agreement time look elsewhere. hypocrisy beyond pale
["overseas", "manufacturing"]
overseas manufacturing
1
0
Deus02
How ironic in which for decades now companies have been moving their manufacturing to low wage off shore locations to boost their profits yet they feel it necessary to attempt to legally inhibit an employee from moving on to a a better opportunity with another organization? Quite laughable when you think China, in particular, has paid little attention to patent rights and intellectual property, let alone their ongoing attempted hacking of American corporate secrets, yet, these companies remain there. If a company insisted on me signing such a questionable agreement, it is time to look elsewhere. The hypocrisy here is beyond the pale.
noncompete deals
A3967-P
company
0
3
12,073
12,004,552
[["ironic", "decades", "companies", "moving", "manufacturing", "low", "wage", "shore", "locations", "boost", "profits", "yet", "feel", "necessary", "attempt", "legally", "inhibit", "employee", "moving", "better", "opportunity", "another", "organization"], ["quite", "laughable", "think", "china", "particular", "paid", "little", "attention", "patent", "rights", "intellectual", "property", "let", "alone", "ongoing", "attempted", "hacking", "american", "corporate", "secrets", "yet", "companies", "remain"], ["company", "insisted", "signing", "questionable", "agreement", "time", "look", "elsewhere"], ["hypocrisy", "beyond", "pale"]]
[["JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "CC", "VBP", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "JJR", "NN", "DT", "NN"], ["JJ", "JJ", "VBP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "VBP"], ["NN", "VBD", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "IN", "NN"]]
ironic decades companies moving manufacturing low wage shore locations boost profits yet feel necessary attempt legally inhibit employee moving better opportunity another organization. quite laughable think china particular paid little attention patent rights intellectual property let alone ongoing attempted hacking american corporate secrets yet companies remain. company insisted signing questionable agreement time look elsewhere. hypocrisy beyond pale
["company"]
company
1
1
Deus02
How ironic in which for decades now companies have been moving their manufacturing to low wage off shore locations to boost their profits yet they feel it necessary to attempt to legally inhibit an employee from moving on to a a better opportunity with another organization? Quite laughable when you think China, in particular, has paid little attention to patent rights and intellectual property, let alone their ongoing attempted hacking of American corporate secrets, yet, these companies remain there. If a company insisted on me signing such a questionable agreement, it is time to look elsewhere. The hypocrisy here is beyond the pale.
new employees
A3966-P
labor laws
0
2
12,113
12,004,552
[["ironic", "decades", "companies", "moving", "manufacturing", "low", "wage", "shore", "locations", "boost", "profits", "yet", "feel", "necessary", "attempt", "legally", "inhibit", "employee", "moving", "better", "opportunity", "another", "organization"], ["quite", "laughable", "think", "china", "particular", "paid", "little", "attention", "patent", "rights", "intellectual", "property", "let", "alone", "ongoing", "attempted", "hacking", "american", "corporate", "secrets", "yet", "companies", "remain"], ["company", "insisted", "signing", "questionable", "agreement", "time", "look", "elsewhere"], ["hypocrisy", "beyond", "pale"]]
[["JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "CC", "VBP", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "JJR", "NN", "DT", "NN"], ["JJ", "JJ", "VBP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "VBP"], ["NN", "VBD", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "IN", "NN"]]
ironic decades companies moving manufacturing low wage shore locations boost profits yet feel necessary attempt legally inhibit employee moving better opportunity another organization. quite laughable think china particular paid little attention patent rights intellectual property let alone ongoing attempted hacking american corporate secrets yet companies remain. company insisted signing questionable agreement time look elsewhere. hypocrisy beyond pale
["labor", "law"]
labor law
1
0
Deus02
How ironic in which for decades now companies have been moving their manufacturing to low wage off shore locations to boost their profits yet they feel it necessary to attempt to legally inhibit an employee from moving on to a a better opportunity with another organization? Quite laughable when you think China, in particular, has paid little attention to patent rights and intellectual property, let alone their ongoing attempted hacking of American corporate secrets, yet, these companies remain there. If a company insisted on me signing such a questionable agreement, it is time to look elsewhere. The hypocrisy here is beyond the pale.
new employees
A3966-P
noncompete agreements
0
2
12,114
12,004,552
[["ironic", "decades", "companies", "moving", "manufacturing", "low", "wage", "shore", "locations", "boost", "profits", "yet", "feel", "necessary", "attempt", "legally", "inhibit", "employee", "moving", "better", "opportunity", "another", "organization"], ["quite", "laughable", "think", "china", "particular", "paid", "little", "attention", "patent", "rights", "intellectual", "property", "let", "alone", "ongoing", "attempted", "hacking", "american", "corporate", "secrets", "yet", "companies", "remain"], ["company", "insisted", "signing", "questionable", "agreement", "time", "look", "elsewhere"], ["hypocrisy", "beyond", "pale"]]
[["JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "CC", "VBP", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "JJR", "NN", "DT", "NN"], ["JJ", "JJ", "VBP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "VBP"], ["NN", "VBD", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "IN", "NN"]]
ironic decades companies moving manufacturing low wage shore locations boost profits yet feel necessary attempt legally inhibit employee moving better opportunity another organization. quite laughable think china particular paid little attention patent rights intellectual property let alone ongoing attempted hacking american corporate secrets yet companies remain. company insisted signing questionable agreement time look elsewhere. hypocrisy beyond pale
["noncompete", "agreement"]
noncompete agreement
1
0
Deus02
How ironic in which for decades now companies have been moving their manufacturing to low wage off shore locations to boost their profits yet they feel it necessary to attempt to legally inhibit an employee from moving on to a a better opportunity with another organization? Quite laughable when you think China, in particular, has paid little attention to patent rights and intellectual property, let alone their ongoing attempted hacking of American corporate secrets, yet, these companies remain there. If a company insisted on me signing such a questionable agreement, it is time to look elsewhere. The hypocrisy here is beyond the pale.
new employees
A3966-P
off shore manufacturing
0
3
12,115
12,004,552
[["ironic", "decades", "companies", "moving", "manufacturing", "low", "wage", "shore", "locations", "boost", "profits", "yet", "feel", "necessary", "attempt", "legally", "inhibit", "employee", "moving", "better", "opportunity", "another", "organization"], ["quite", "laughable", "think", "china", "particular", "paid", "little", "attention", "patent", "rights", "intellectual", "property", "let", "alone", "ongoing", "attempted", "hacking", "american", "corporate", "secrets", "yet", "companies", "remain"], ["company", "insisted", "signing", "questionable", "agreement", "time", "look", "elsewhere"], ["hypocrisy", "beyond", "pale"]]
[["JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "CC", "VBP", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "JJR", "NN", "DT", "NN"], ["JJ", "JJ", "VBP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "VBP"], ["NN", "VBD", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "IN", "NN"]]
ironic decades companies moving manufacturing low wage shore locations boost profits yet feel necessary attempt legally inhibit employee moving better opportunity another organization. quite laughable think china particular paid little attention patent rights intellectual property let alone ongoing attempted hacking american corporate secrets yet companies remain. company insisted signing questionable agreement time look elsewhere. hypocrisy beyond pale
["shore", "manufacturing"]
shore manufacturing
1
0
Deus02
How ironic in which for decades now companies have been moving their manufacturing to low wage off shore locations to boost their profits yet they feel it necessary to attempt to legally inhibit an employee from moving on to a a better opportunity with another organization? Quite laughable when you think China, in particular, has paid little attention to patent rights and intellectual property, let alone their ongoing attempted hacking of American corporate secrets, yet, these companies remain there. If a company insisted on me signing such a questionable agreement, it is time to look elsewhere. The hypocrisy here is beyond the pale.
new employees
A3966-P
offshore manufacturing
0
3
12,116
12,004,552
[["ironic", "decades", "companies", "moving", "manufacturing", "low", "wage", "shore", "locations", "boost", "profits", "yet", "feel", "necessary", "attempt", "legally", "inhibit", "employee", "moving", "better", "opportunity", "another", "organization"], ["quite", "laughable", "think", "china", "particular", "paid", "little", "attention", "patent", "rights", "intellectual", "property", "let", "alone", "ongoing", "attempted", "hacking", "american", "corporate", "secrets", "yet", "companies", "remain"], ["company", "insisted", "signing", "questionable", "agreement", "time", "look", "elsewhere"], ["hypocrisy", "beyond", "pale"]]
[["JJ", "NNS", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "CC", "VBP", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "JJR", "NN", "DT", "NN"], ["JJ", "JJ", "VBP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "NNS", "VBP"], ["NN", "VBD", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "IN", "NN"]]
ironic decades companies moving manufacturing low wage shore locations boost profits yet feel necessary attempt legally inhibit employee moving better opportunity another organization. quite laughable think china particular paid little attention patent rights intellectual property let alone ongoing attempted hacking american corporate secrets yet companies remain. company insisted signing questionable agreement time look elsewhere. hypocrisy beyond pale
["offshore", "manufacturing"]
offshore manufacturing
1
0
Bill
All the people who decry inequity and blame the 1% for the country's ills ought to focus on eliminating gambling. The participants are generally poorer, less educated, and perhaps unaware of the odds. Why should the state sanction this type of activity? Liberals (and some conservatives) love gambling because it is a new hidden tax. The money rarely has much impact on what it is sold to help. "All the money goes to education" means whatever education gets from the lottery the state reduces in other aid. Suddenly new money to spend on winning votes. If you care about inequity, start with limiting or ending gambling!
a gamble
A3456-P
a gamble
0
1
13,013
10,226,903
[["people", "decry", "inequity", "blame", "1", "country", "'s", "ills", "ought", "focus", "eliminating", "gambling"], ["participants", "generally", "poorer", "less", "educated", "perhaps", "unaware", "odds"], ["state", "sanction", "type", "activity"], ["liberals", "conservatives", "love", "gambling", "new", "hidden", "tax"], ["money", "rarely", "much", "impact", "sold", "help"], ["money", "goes", "education", "means", "whatever", "education", "gets", "lottery", "state", "reduces", "aid"], ["suddenly", "new", "money", "spend", "winning", "votes"], ["care", "inequity", "start", "limiting", "ending", "gambling"]]
[["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "CD", "NN", "POS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "VBG", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "JJR", "RBR", "VBN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBZ", "WDT", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "VB", "VBG", "VBG", "NN"]]
people decry inequity blame 1 country 's ills ought focus eliminating gambling. participants generally poorer less educated perhaps unaware odds. state sanction type activity. liberals conservatives love gambling new hidden tax. money rarely much impact sold help. money goes education means whatever education gets lottery state reduces aid. suddenly new money spend winning votes. care inequity start limiting ending gambling
["gamble"]
gamble
1
0
Bill
All the people who decry inequity and blame the 1% for the country's ills ought to focus on eliminating gambling. The participants are generally poorer, less educated, and perhaps unaware of the odds. Why should the state sanction this type of activity? Liberals (and some conservatives) love gambling because it is a new hidden tax. The money rarely has much impact on what it is sold to help. "All the money goes to education" means whatever education gets from the lottery the state reduces in other aid. Suddenly new money to spend on winning votes. If you care about inequity, start with limiting or ending gambling!
a gamble
A3456-P
gamble
0
3
13,014
10,226,903
[["people", "decry", "inequity", "blame", "1", "country", "'s", "ills", "ought", "focus", "eliminating", "gambling"], ["participants", "generally", "poorer", "less", "educated", "perhaps", "unaware", "odds"], ["state", "sanction", "type", "activity"], ["liberals", "conservatives", "love", "gambling", "new", "hidden", "tax"], ["money", "rarely", "much", "impact", "sold", "help"], ["money", "goes", "education", "means", "whatever", "education", "gets", "lottery", "state", "reduces", "aid"], ["suddenly", "new", "money", "spend", "winning", "votes"], ["care", "inequity", "start", "limiting", "ending", "gambling"]]
[["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "CD", "NN", "POS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "VBG", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "JJR", "RBR", "VBN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBZ", "WDT", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "VB", "VBG", "VBG", "NN"]]
people decry inequity blame 1 country 's ills ought focus eliminating gambling. participants generally poorer less educated perhaps unaware odds. state sanction type activity. liberals conservatives love gambling new hidden tax. money rarely much impact sold help. money goes education means whatever education gets lottery state reduces aid. suddenly new money spend winning votes. care inequity start limiting ending gambling
["gamble"]
gamble
1
0
Bill
All the people who decry inequity and blame the 1% for the country's ills ought to focus on eliminating gambling. The participants are generally poorer, less educated, and perhaps unaware of the odds. Why should the state sanction this type of activity? Liberals (and some conservatives) love gambling because it is a new hidden tax. The money rarely has much impact on what it is sold to help. "All the money goes to education" means whatever education gets from the lottery the state reduces in other aid. Suddenly new money to spend on winning votes. If you care about inequity, start with limiting or ending gambling!
a gamble
A3456-P
equity
0
3
13,015
10,226,903
[["people", "decry", "inequity", "blame", "1", "country", "'s", "ills", "ought", "focus", "eliminating", "gambling"], ["participants", "generally", "poorer", "less", "educated", "perhaps", "unaware", "odds"], ["state", "sanction", "type", "activity"], ["liberals", "conservatives", "love", "gambling", "new", "hidden", "tax"], ["money", "rarely", "much", "impact", "sold", "help"], ["money", "goes", "education", "means", "whatever", "education", "gets", "lottery", "state", "reduces", "aid"], ["suddenly", "new", "money", "spend", "winning", "votes"], ["care", "inequity", "start", "limiting", "ending", "gambling"]]
[["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "CD", "NN", "POS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "VBG", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "JJR", "RBR", "VBN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBZ", "WDT", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "VB", "VBG", "VBG", "NN"]]
people decry inequity blame 1 country 's ills ought focus eliminating gambling. participants generally poorer less educated perhaps unaware odds. state sanction type activity. liberals conservatives love gambling new hidden tax. money rarely much impact sold help. money goes education means whatever education gets lottery state reduces aid. suddenly new money spend winning votes. care inequity start limiting ending gambling
["equity"]
equity
1
1
Bill
All the people who decry inequity and blame the 1% for the country's ills ought to focus on eliminating gambling. The participants are generally poorer, less educated, and perhaps unaware of the odds. Why should the state sanction this type of activity? Liberals (and some conservatives) love gambling because it is a new hidden tax. The money rarely has much impact on what it is sold to help. "All the money goes to education" means whatever education gets from the lottery the state reduces in other aid. Suddenly new money to spend on winning votes. If you care about inequity, start with limiting or ending gambling!
casinos
A3455-P
casinos
0
1
14,169
10,226,903
[["people", "decry", "inequity", "blame", "1", "country", "'s", "ills", "ought", "focus", "eliminating", "gambling"], ["participants", "generally", "poorer", "less", "educated", "perhaps", "unaware", "odds"], ["state", "sanction", "type", "activity"], ["liberals", "conservatives", "love", "gambling", "new", "hidden", "tax"], ["money", "rarely", "much", "impact", "sold", "help"], ["money", "goes", "education", "means", "whatever", "education", "gets", "lottery", "state", "reduces", "aid"], ["suddenly", "new", "money", "spend", "winning", "votes"], ["care", "inequity", "start", "limiting", "ending", "gambling"]]
[["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "CD", "NN", "POS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "VBG", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "JJR", "RBR", "VBN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBZ", "WDT", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "VB", "VBG", "VBG", "NN"]]
people decry inequity blame 1 country 's ills ought focus eliminating gambling. participants generally poorer less educated perhaps unaware odds. state sanction type activity. liberals conservatives love gambling new hidden tax. money rarely much impact sold help. money goes education means whatever education gets lottery state reduces aid. suddenly new money spend winning votes. care inequity start limiting ending gambling
["casino"]
casino
1
0
Bill
All the people who decry inequity and blame the 1% for the country's ills ought to focus on eliminating gambling. The participants are generally poorer, less educated, and perhaps unaware of the odds. Why should the state sanction this type of activity? Liberals (and some conservatives) love gambling because it is a new hidden tax. The money rarely has much impact on what it is sold to help. "All the money goes to education" means whatever education gets from the lottery the state reduces in other aid. Suddenly new money to spend on winning votes. If you care about inequity, start with limiting or ending gambling!
casinos
A3455-P
gamble
0
3
14,170
10,226,903
[["people", "decry", "inequity", "blame", "1", "country", "'s", "ills", "ought", "focus", "eliminating", "gambling"], ["participants", "generally", "poorer", "less", "educated", "perhaps", "unaware", "odds"], ["state", "sanction", "type", "activity"], ["liberals", "conservatives", "love", "gambling", "new", "hidden", "tax"], ["money", "rarely", "much", "impact", "sold", "help"], ["money", "goes", "education", "means", "whatever", "education", "gets", "lottery", "state", "reduces", "aid"], ["suddenly", "new", "money", "spend", "winning", "votes"], ["care", "inequity", "start", "limiting", "ending", "gambling"]]
[["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "CD", "NN", "POS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "VBG", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "JJR", "RBR", "VBN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBZ", "WDT", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "VB", "VBG", "VBG", "NN"]]
people decry inequity blame 1 country 's ills ought focus eliminating gambling. participants generally poorer less educated perhaps unaware odds. state sanction type activity. liberals conservatives love gambling new hidden tax. money rarely much impact sold help. money goes education means whatever education gets lottery state reduces aid. suddenly new money spend winning votes. care inequity start limiting ending gambling
["gamble"]
gamble
1
0
Bill
All the people who decry inequity and blame the 1% for the country's ills ought to focus on eliminating gambling. The participants are generally poorer, less educated, and perhaps unaware of the odds. Why should the state sanction this type of activity? Liberals (and some conservatives) love gambling because it is a new hidden tax. The money rarely has much impact on what it is sold to help. "All the money goes to education" means whatever education gets from the lottery the state reduces in other aid. Suddenly new money to spend on winning votes. If you care about inequity, start with limiting or ending gambling!
casinos
A3455-P
income inequality
0
3
14,171
10,226,903
[["people", "decry", "inequity", "blame", "1", "country", "'s", "ills", "ought", "focus", "eliminating", "gambling"], ["participants", "generally", "poorer", "less", "educated", "perhaps", "unaware", "odds"], ["state", "sanction", "type", "activity"], ["liberals", "conservatives", "love", "gambling", "new", "hidden", "tax"], ["money", "rarely", "much", "impact", "sold", "help"], ["money", "goes", "education", "means", "whatever", "education", "gets", "lottery", "state", "reduces", "aid"], ["suddenly", "new", "money", "spend", "winning", "votes"], ["care", "inequity", "start", "limiting", "ending", "gambling"]]
[["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "VB", "CD", "NN", "POS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "VBG", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "JJR", "RBR", "VBN", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBZ", "WDT", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN"], ["RB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "VBG", "NNS"], ["VBP", "NN", "VB", "VBG", "VBG", "NN"]]
people decry inequity blame 1 country 's ills ought focus eliminating gambling. participants generally poorer less educated perhaps unaware odds. state sanction type activity. liberals conservatives love gambling new hidden tax. money rarely much impact sold help. money goes education means whatever education gets lottery state reduces aid. suddenly new money spend winning votes. care inequity start limiting ending gambling
["income", "inequality"]
income inequality
1
0
Mike
"It would be similar to pushing back the outfield fence in baseball, and nobody wants to see fewer home runs." Right on one count, wrong on the other. Hey, I know, let's lower the rim so everyone can dunk. Then it'll be even better, right? The assumption that fans are too stupid to appreciate nuance is why modern basketball is a dunking contest, modern baseball is a home run derby, and I've lost my patience with both. I can't be alone.
rim
A4709-P
rim
0
1
6,440
9,047,256
[["would", "similar", "pushing", "back", "outfield", "fence", "baseball", "nobody", "wants", "see", "fewer", "home", "runs"], ["right", "one", "count", "wrong"], ["hey", "know", "let", "'s", "lower", "rim", "everyone", "dunk"], ["'ll", "even", "better", "right"], ["assumption", "fans", "stupid", "appreciate", "nuance", "modern", "basketball", "dunking", "contest", "modern", "baseball", "home", "run", "derby", "'ve", "lost", "patience"], ["ca", "n't", "alone"]]
[["MD", "JJ", "VBG", "RP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "CD", "NN", "JJ"], ["UH", "VBP", "VB", "PRP", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB"], ["MD", "RB", "JJR", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "NN"], ["MD", "RB", "JJ"]]
would similar pushing back outfield fence baseball nobody wants see fewer home runs. right one count wrong. hey know let 's lower rim everyone dunk. 'll even better right. assumption fans stupid appreciate nuance modern basketball dunking contest modern baseball home run derby 've lost patience. ca n't alone
["rim"]
rim
1
1
Mike
"It would be similar to pushing back the outfield fence in baseball, and nobody wants to see fewer home runs." Right on one count, wrong on the other. Hey, I know, let's lower the rim so everyone can dunk. Then it'll be even better, right? The assumption that fans are too stupid to appreciate nuance is why modern basketball is a dunking contest, modern baseball is a home run derby, and I've lost my patience with both. I can't be alone.
rim
A4709-P
sport
0
3
6,441
9,047,256
[["would", "similar", "pushing", "back", "outfield", "fence", "baseball", "nobody", "wants", "see", "fewer", "home", "runs"], ["right", "one", "count", "wrong"], ["hey", "know", "let", "'s", "lower", "rim", "everyone", "dunk"], ["'ll", "even", "better", "right"], ["assumption", "fans", "stupid", "appreciate", "nuance", "modern", "basketball", "dunking", "contest", "modern", "baseball", "home", "run", "derby", "'ve", "lost", "patience"], ["ca", "n't", "alone"]]
[["MD", "JJ", "VBG", "RP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "CD", "NN", "JJ"], ["UH", "VBP", "VB", "PRP", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB"], ["MD", "RB", "JJR", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "NN"], ["MD", "RB", "JJ"]]
would similar pushing back outfield fence baseball nobody wants see fewer home runs. right one count wrong. hey know let 's lower rim everyone dunk. 'll even better right. assumption fans stupid appreciate nuance modern basketball dunking contest modern baseball home run derby 've lost patience. ca n't alone
["sport"]
sport
1
0
Mike
"It would be similar to pushing back the outfield fence in baseball, and nobody wants to see fewer home runs." Right on one count, wrong on the other. Hey, I know, let's lower the rim so everyone can dunk. Then it'll be even better, right? The assumption that fans are too stupid to appreciate nuance is why modern basketball is a dunking contest, modern baseball is a home run derby, and I've lost my patience with both. I can't be alone.
rim
A4709-P
modern sports
0
3
6,442
9,047,256
[["would", "similar", "pushing", "back", "outfield", "fence", "baseball", "nobody", "wants", "see", "fewer", "home", "runs"], ["right", "one", "count", "wrong"], ["hey", "know", "let", "'s", "lower", "rim", "everyone", "dunk"], ["'ll", "even", "better", "right"], ["assumption", "fans", "stupid", "appreciate", "nuance", "modern", "basketball", "dunking", "contest", "modern", "baseball", "home", "run", "derby", "'ve", "lost", "patience"], ["ca", "n't", "alone"]]
[["MD", "JJ", "VBG", "RP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "CD", "NN", "JJ"], ["UH", "VBP", "VB", "PRP", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB"], ["MD", "RB", "JJR", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "NN"], ["MD", "RB", "JJ"]]
would similar pushing back outfield fence baseball nobody wants see fewer home runs. right one count wrong. hey know let 's lower rim everyone dunk. 'll even better right. assumption fans stupid appreciate nuance modern basketball dunking contest modern baseball home run derby 've lost patience. ca n't alone
["modern", "sport"]
modern sport
1
0
Mike
"It would be similar to pushing back the outfield fence in baseball, and nobody wants to see fewer home runs." Right on one count, wrong on the other. Hey, I know, let's lower the rim so everyone can dunk. Then it'll be even better, right? The assumption that fans are too stupid to appreciate nuance is why modern basketball is a dunking contest, modern baseball is a home run derby, and I've lost my patience with both. I can't be alone.
rim
A4709-P
outfield fence
1
2
6,443
9,047,256
[["would", "similar", "pushing", "back", "outfield", "fence", "baseball", "nobody", "wants", "see", "fewer", "home", "runs"], ["right", "one", "count", "wrong"], ["hey", "know", "let", "'s", "lower", "rim", "everyone", "dunk"], ["'ll", "even", "better", "right"], ["assumption", "fans", "stupid", "appreciate", "nuance", "modern", "basketball", "dunking", "contest", "modern", "baseball", "home", "run", "derby", "'ve", "lost", "patience"], ["ca", "n't", "alone"]]
[["MD", "JJ", "VBG", "RP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "CD", "NN", "JJ"], ["UH", "VBP", "VB", "PRP", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB"], ["MD", "RB", "JJR", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "NN"], ["MD", "RB", "JJ"]]
would similar pushing back outfield fence baseball nobody wants see fewer home runs. right one count wrong. hey know let 's lower rim everyone dunk. 'll even better right. assumption fans stupid appreciate nuance modern basketball dunking contest modern baseball home run derby 've lost patience. ca n't alone
["outfield", "fence"]
outfield fence
1
1
Mike
"It would be similar to pushing back the outfield fence in baseball, and nobody wants to see fewer home runs." Right on one count, wrong on the other. Hey, I know, let's lower the rim so everyone can dunk. Then it'll be even better, right? The assumption that fans are too stupid to appreciate nuance is why modern basketball is a dunking contest, modern baseball is a home run derby, and I've lost my patience with both. I can't be alone.
rim
A4709-P
home runs
1
3
6,444
9,047,256
[["would", "similar", "pushing", "back", "outfield", "fence", "baseball", "nobody", "wants", "see", "fewer", "home", "runs"], ["right", "one", "count", "wrong"], ["hey", "know", "let", "'s", "lower", "rim", "everyone", "dunk"], ["'ll", "even", "better", "right"], ["assumption", "fans", "stupid", "appreciate", "nuance", "modern", "basketball", "dunking", "contest", "modern", "baseball", "home", "run", "derby", "'ve", "lost", "patience"], ["ca", "n't", "alone"]]
[["MD", "JJ", "VBG", "RP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "CD", "NN", "JJ"], ["UH", "VBP", "VB", "PRP", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB"], ["MD", "RB", "JJR", "JJ"], ["NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "NN"], ["MD", "RB", "JJ"]]
would similar pushing back outfield fence baseball nobody wants see fewer home runs. right one count wrong. hey know let 's lower rim everyone dunk. 'll even better right. assumption fans stupid appreciate nuance modern basketball dunking contest modern baseball home run derby 've lost patience. ca n't alone
["home", "run"]
home run
1
1
bnc
It gets worse - far worse - for those people who make deliveries. It is extremely hard - if not impossible - to convey to a customer that a "delivery charge" is not a tip, especially when the vendors used to promise "free delivery". Greedy shop operators take their cut off the top. Drivers need to be paid for the use of their vehicles but often do not get enough from the owners to defray those costs. Often, too, the delivery people get compensated at the same paltry rates as inside wait staff - with the implicit inclusion of a certain gratuity amount to even meet the minimum wage.. An educated consumer will ask: "Does the delivery charge include your gratuity and the costs you incurred using your vehicle to get here?" An educated consumer should be anyone who orders any food to be delivered to his door. An educated consumer should be empathetic to the person who hands him his food at the door and, consequently tip as much as he can.
workplace
A3354-P
workplace
0
1
5,344
9,309,403
[["gets", "worse", "far", "worse", "people", "make", "deliveries"], ["extremely", "hard", "impossible", "convey", "customer", "delivery", "charge", "tip", "especially", "vendors", "used", "promise", "free", "delivery"], ["greedy", "shop", "operators", "take", "cut", "top"], ["drivers", "need", "paid", "use", "vehicles", "often", "get", "enough", "owners", "defray", "costs"], ["often", "delivery", "people", "get", "compensated", "paltry", "rates", "inside", "wait", "staff", "implicit", "inclusion", "certain", "gratuity", "amount", "even", "meet", "minimum", "wage", "..", "educated", "consumer", "ask", "delivery", "charge", "include", "gratuity", "costs", "incurred", "using", "vehicle", "get"], ["educated", "consumer", "anyone", "orders", "food", "delivered", "door"], ["educated", "consumer", "empathetic", "person", "hands", "food", "door", "consequently", "tip", "much"]]
[["VBZ", "JJR", "RB", "JJR", "NNS", "VBP", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NNS", "VBD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", ".", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "VBG", "NN", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "RB"]]
gets worse far worse people make deliveries. extremely hard impossible convey customer delivery charge tip especially vendors used promise free delivery. greedy shop operators take cut top. drivers need paid use vehicles often get enough owners defray costs. often delivery people get compensated paltry rates inside wait staff implicit inclusion certain gratuity amount even meet minimum wage .. educated consumer ask delivery charge include gratuity costs incurred using vehicle get. educated consumer anyone orders food delivered door. educated consumer empathetic person hands food door consequently tip much
["workplace"]
workplace
1
0
bnc
It gets worse - far worse - for those people who make deliveries. It is extremely hard - if not impossible - to convey to a customer that a "delivery charge" is not a tip, especially when the vendors used to promise "free delivery". Greedy shop operators take their cut off the top. Drivers need to be paid for the use of their vehicles but often do not get enough from the owners to defray those costs. Often, too, the delivery people get compensated at the same paltry rates as inside wait staff - with the implicit inclusion of a certain gratuity amount to even meet the minimum wage.. An educated consumer will ask: "Does the delivery charge include your gratuity and the costs you incurred using your vehicle to get here?" An educated consumer should be anyone who orders any food to be delivered to his door. An educated consumer should be empathetic to the person who hands him his food at the door and, consequently tip as much as he can.
workplace
A3354-P
delivery services
0
3
5,345
9,309,403
[["gets", "worse", "far", "worse", "people", "make", "deliveries"], ["extremely", "hard", "impossible", "convey", "customer", "delivery", "charge", "tip", "especially", "vendors", "used", "promise", "free", "delivery"], ["greedy", "shop", "operators", "take", "cut", "top"], ["drivers", "need", "paid", "use", "vehicles", "often", "get", "enough", "owners", "defray", "costs"], ["often", "delivery", "people", "get", "compensated", "paltry", "rates", "inside", "wait", "staff", "implicit", "inclusion", "certain", "gratuity", "amount", "even", "meet", "minimum", "wage", "..", "educated", "consumer", "ask", "delivery", "charge", "include", "gratuity", "costs", "incurred", "using", "vehicle", "get"], ["educated", "consumer", "anyone", "orders", "food", "delivered", "door"], ["educated", "consumer", "empathetic", "person", "hands", "food", "door", "consequently", "tip", "much"]]
[["VBZ", "JJR", "RB", "JJR", "NNS", "VBP", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NNS", "VBD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", ".", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "VBG", "NN", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "RB"]]
gets worse far worse people make deliveries. extremely hard impossible convey customer delivery charge tip especially vendors used promise free delivery. greedy shop operators take cut top. drivers need paid use vehicles often get enough owners defray costs. often delivery people get compensated paltry rates inside wait staff implicit inclusion certain gratuity amount even meet minimum wage .. educated consumer ask delivery charge include gratuity costs incurred using vehicle get. educated consumer anyone orders food delivered door. educated consumer empathetic person hands food door consequently tip much
["delivery", "service"]
delivery service
1
0
bnc
It gets worse - far worse - for those people who make deliveries. It is extremely hard - if not impossible - to convey to a customer that a "delivery charge" is not a tip, especially when the vendors used to promise "free delivery". Greedy shop operators take their cut off the top. Drivers need to be paid for the use of their vehicles but often do not get enough from the owners to defray those costs. Often, too, the delivery people get compensated at the same paltry rates as inside wait staff - with the implicit inclusion of a certain gratuity amount to even meet the minimum wage.. An educated consumer will ask: "Does the delivery charge include your gratuity and the costs you incurred using your vehicle to get here?" An educated consumer should be anyone who orders any food to be delivered to his door. An educated consumer should be empathetic to the person who hands him his food at the door and, consequently tip as much as he can.
workplace
A3354-P
delivery charges
1
3
5,346
9,309,403
[["gets", "worse", "far", "worse", "people", "make", "deliveries"], ["extremely", "hard", "impossible", "convey", "customer", "delivery", "charge", "tip", "especially", "vendors", "used", "promise", "free", "delivery"], ["greedy", "shop", "operators", "take", "cut", "top"], ["drivers", "need", "paid", "use", "vehicles", "often", "get", "enough", "owners", "defray", "costs"], ["often", "delivery", "people", "get", "compensated", "paltry", "rates", "inside", "wait", "staff", "implicit", "inclusion", "certain", "gratuity", "amount", "even", "meet", "minimum", "wage", "..", "educated", "consumer", "ask", "delivery", "charge", "include", "gratuity", "costs", "incurred", "using", "vehicle", "get"], ["educated", "consumer", "anyone", "orders", "food", "delivered", "door"], ["educated", "consumer", "empathetic", "person", "hands", "food", "door", "consequently", "tip", "much"]]
[["VBZ", "JJR", "RB", "JJR", "NNS", "VBP", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NNS", "VBD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", ".", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "VBG", "NN", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "RB"]]
gets worse far worse people make deliveries. extremely hard impossible convey customer delivery charge tip especially vendors used promise free delivery. greedy shop operators take cut top. drivers need paid use vehicles often get enough owners defray costs. often delivery people get compensated paltry rates inside wait staff implicit inclusion certain gratuity amount even meet minimum wage .. educated consumer ask delivery charge include gratuity costs incurred using vehicle get. educated consumer anyone orders food delivered door. educated consumer empathetic person hands food door consequently tip much
["delivery", "charge"]
delivery charge
1
1
bnc
It gets worse - far worse - for those people who make deliveries. It is extremely hard - if not impossible - to convey to a customer that a "delivery charge" is not a tip, especially when the vendors used to promise "free delivery". Greedy shop operators take their cut off the top. Drivers need to be paid for the use of their vehicles but often do not get enough from the owners to defray those costs. Often, too, the delivery people get compensated at the same paltry rates as inside wait staff - with the implicit inclusion of a certain gratuity amount to even meet the minimum wage.. An educated consumer will ask: "Does the delivery charge include your gratuity and the costs you incurred using your vehicle to get here?" An educated consumer should be anyone who orders any food to be delivered to his door. An educated consumer should be empathetic to the person who hands him his food at the door and, consequently tip as much as he can.
workplace
A3354-P
tipping workers
1
2
5,347
9,309,403
[["gets", "worse", "far", "worse", "people", "make", "deliveries"], ["extremely", "hard", "impossible", "convey", "customer", "delivery", "charge", "tip", "especially", "vendors", "used", "promise", "free", "delivery"], ["greedy", "shop", "operators", "take", "cut", "top"], ["drivers", "need", "paid", "use", "vehicles", "often", "get", "enough", "owners", "defray", "costs"], ["often", "delivery", "people", "get", "compensated", "paltry", "rates", "inside", "wait", "staff", "implicit", "inclusion", "certain", "gratuity", "amount", "even", "meet", "minimum", "wage", "..", "educated", "consumer", "ask", "delivery", "charge", "include", "gratuity", "costs", "incurred", "using", "vehicle", "get"], ["educated", "consumer", "anyone", "orders", "food", "delivered", "door"], ["educated", "consumer", "empathetic", "person", "hands", "food", "door", "consequently", "tip", "much"]]
[["VBZ", "JJR", "RB", "JJR", "NNS", "VBP", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NNS", "VBD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", ".", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "VBG", "NN", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "RB"]]
gets worse far worse people make deliveries. extremely hard impossible convey customer delivery charge tip especially vendors used promise free delivery. greedy shop operators take cut top. drivers need paid use vehicles often get enough owners defray costs. often delivery people get compensated paltry rates inside wait staff implicit inclusion certain gratuity amount even meet minimum wage .. educated consumer ask delivery charge include gratuity costs incurred using vehicle get. educated consumer anyone orders food delivered door. educated consumer empathetic person hands food door consequently tip much
["tipping", "worker"]
tipping worker
1
0
bnc
It gets worse - far worse - for those people who make deliveries. It is extremely hard - if not impossible - to convey to a customer that a "delivery charge" is not a tip, especially when the vendors used to promise "free delivery". Greedy shop operators take their cut off the top. Drivers need to be paid for the use of their vehicles but often do not get enough from the owners to defray those costs. Often, too, the delivery people get compensated at the same paltry rates as inside wait staff - with the implicit inclusion of a certain gratuity amount to even meet the minimum wage.. An educated consumer will ask: "Does the delivery charge include your gratuity and the costs you incurred using your vehicle to get here?" An educated consumer should be anyone who orders any food to be delivered to his door. An educated consumer should be empathetic to the person who hands him his food at the door and, consequently tip as much as he can.
workplace
A3354-P
delivery charge
1
3
5,348
9,309,403
[["gets", "worse", "far", "worse", "people", "make", "deliveries"], ["extremely", "hard", "impossible", "convey", "customer", "delivery", "charge", "tip", "especially", "vendors", "used", "promise", "free", "delivery"], ["greedy", "shop", "operators", "take", "cut", "top"], ["drivers", "need", "paid", "use", "vehicles", "often", "get", "enough", "owners", "defray", "costs"], ["often", "delivery", "people", "get", "compensated", "paltry", "rates", "inside", "wait", "staff", "implicit", "inclusion", "certain", "gratuity", "amount", "even", "meet", "minimum", "wage", "..", "educated", "consumer", "ask", "delivery", "charge", "include", "gratuity", "costs", "incurred", "using", "vehicle", "get"], ["educated", "consumer", "anyone", "orders", "food", "delivered", "door"], ["educated", "consumer", "empathetic", "person", "hands", "food", "door", "consequently", "tip", "much"]]
[["VBZ", "JJR", "RB", "JJR", "NNS", "VBP", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NNS", "VBD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", ".", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "VBG", "NN", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "RB"]]
gets worse far worse people make deliveries. extremely hard impossible convey customer delivery charge tip especially vendors used promise free delivery. greedy shop operators take cut top. drivers need paid use vehicles often get enough owners defray costs. often delivery people get compensated paltry rates inside wait staff implicit inclusion certain gratuity amount even meet minimum wage .. educated consumer ask delivery charge include gratuity costs incurred using vehicle get. educated consumer anyone orders food delivered door. educated consumer empathetic person hands food door consequently tip much
["delivery", "charge"]
delivery charge
1
1
bnc
It gets worse - far worse - for those people who make deliveries. It is extremely hard - if not impossible - to convey to a customer that a "delivery charge" is not a tip, especially when the vendors used to promise "free delivery". Greedy shop operators take their cut off the top. Drivers need to be paid for the use of their vehicles but often do not get enough from the owners to defray those costs. Often, too, the delivery people get compensated at the same paltry rates as inside wait staff - with the implicit inclusion of a certain gratuity amount to even meet the minimum wage.. An educated consumer will ask: "Does the delivery charge include your gratuity and the costs you incurred using your vehicle to get here?" An educated consumer should be anyone who orders any food to be delivered to his door. An educated consumer should be empathetic to the person who hands him his food at the door and, consequently tip as much as he can.
restaurants
A3353-P
restaurants
0
1
16,416
9,309,403
[["gets", "worse", "far", "worse", "people", "make", "deliveries"], ["extremely", "hard", "impossible", "convey", "customer", "delivery", "charge", "tip", "especially", "vendors", "used", "promise", "free", "delivery"], ["greedy", "shop", "operators", "take", "cut", "top"], ["drivers", "need", "paid", "use", "vehicles", "often", "get", "enough", "owners", "defray", "costs"], ["often", "delivery", "people", "get", "compensated", "paltry", "rates", "inside", "wait", "staff", "implicit", "inclusion", "certain", "gratuity", "amount", "even", "meet", "minimum", "wage", "..", "educated", "consumer", "ask", "delivery", "charge", "include", "gratuity", "costs", "incurred", "using", "vehicle", "get"], ["educated", "consumer", "anyone", "orders", "food", "delivered", "door"], ["educated", "consumer", "empathetic", "person", "hands", "food", "door", "consequently", "tip", "much"]]
[["VBZ", "JJR", "RB", "JJR", "NNS", "VBP", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NNS", "VBD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", ".", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "VBG", "NN", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "RB"]]
gets worse far worse people make deliveries. extremely hard impossible convey customer delivery charge tip especially vendors used promise free delivery. greedy shop operators take cut top. drivers need paid use vehicles often get enough owners defray costs. often delivery people get compensated paltry rates inside wait staff implicit inclusion certain gratuity amount even meet minimum wage .. educated consumer ask delivery charge include gratuity costs incurred using vehicle get. educated consumer anyone orders food delivered door. educated consumer empathetic person hands food door consequently tip much
["restaurant"]
restaurant
1
0
bnc
It gets worse - far worse - for those people who make deliveries. It is extremely hard - if not impossible - to convey to a customer that a "delivery charge" is not a tip, especially when the vendors used to promise "free delivery". Greedy shop operators take their cut off the top. Drivers need to be paid for the use of their vehicles but often do not get enough from the owners to defray those costs. Often, too, the delivery people get compensated at the same paltry rates as inside wait staff - with the implicit inclusion of a certain gratuity amount to even meet the minimum wage.. An educated consumer will ask: "Does the delivery charge include your gratuity and the costs you incurred using your vehicle to get here?" An educated consumer should be anyone who orders any food to be delivered to his door. An educated consumer should be empathetic to the person who hands him his food at the door and, consequently tip as much as he can.
restaurants
A3353-P
people who make deliveries
0
3
16,417
9,309,403
[["gets", "worse", "far", "worse", "people", "make", "deliveries"], ["extremely", "hard", "impossible", "convey", "customer", "delivery", "charge", "tip", "especially", "vendors", "used", "promise", "free", "delivery"], ["greedy", "shop", "operators", "take", "cut", "top"], ["drivers", "need", "paid", "use", "vehicles", "often", "get", "enough", "owners", "defray", "costs"], ["often", "delivery", "people", "get", "compensated", "paltry", "rates", "inside", "wait", "staff", "implicit", "inclusion", "certain", "gratuity", "amount", "even", "meet", "minimum", "wage", "..", "educated", "consumer", "ask", "delivery", "charge", "include", "gratuity", "costs", "incurred", "using", "vehicle", "get"], ["educated", "consumer", "anyone", "orders", "food", "delivered", "door"], ["educated", "consumer", "empathetic", "person", "hands", "food", "door", "consequently", "tip", "much"]]
[["VBZ", "JJR", "RB", "JJR", "NNS", "VBP", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NNS", "VBD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", ".", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "VBG", "NN", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "RB"]]
gets worse far worse people make deliveries. extremely hard impossible convey customer delivery charge tip especially vendors used promise free delivery. greedy shop operators take cut top. drivers need paid use vehicles often get enough owners defray costs. often delivery people get compensated paltry rates inside wait staff implicit inclusion certain gratuity amount even meet minimum wage .. educated consumer ask delivery charge include gratuity costs incurred using vehicle get. educated consumer anyone orders food delivered door. educated consumer empathetic person hands food door consequently tip much
["people", "make", "delivery"]
people make delivery
1
0
bnc
It gets worse - far worse - for those people who make deliveries. It is extremely hard - if not impossible - to convey to a customer that a "delivery charge" is not a tip, especially when the vendors used to promise "free delivery". Greedy shop operators take their cut off the top. Drivers need to be paid for the use of their vehicles but often do not get enough from the owners to defray those costs. Often, too, the delivery people get compensated at the same paltry rates as inside wait staff - with the implicit inclusion of a certain gratuity amount to even meet the minimum wage.. An educated consumer will ask: "Does the delivery charge include your gratuity and the costs you incurred using your vehicle to get here?" An educated consumer should be anyone who orders any food to be delivered to his door. An educated consumer should be empathetic to the person who hands him his food at the door and, consequently tip as much as he can.
restaurants
A3353-P
none
1
3
16,418
9,309,403
[["gets", "worse", "far", "worse", "people", "make", "deliveries"], ["extremely", "hard", "impossible", "convey", "customer", "delivery", "charge", "tip", "especially", "vendors", "used", "promise", "free", "delivery"], ["greedy", "shop", "operators", "take", "cut", "top"], ["drivers", "need", "paid", "use", "vehicles", "often", "get", "enough", "owners", "defray", "costs"], ["often", "delivery", "people", "get", "compensated", "paltry", "rates", "inside", "wait", "staff", "implicit", "inclusion", "certain", "gratuity", "amount", "even", "meet", "minimum", "wage", "..", "educated", "consumer", "ask", "delivery", "charge", "include", "gratuity", "costs", "incurred", "using", "vehicle", "get"], ["educated", "consumer", "anyone", "orders", "food", "delivered", "door"], ["educated", "consumer", "empathetic", "person", "hands", "food", "door", "consequently", "tip", "much"]]
[["VBZ", "JJR", "RB", "JJR", "NNS", "VBP", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NNS", "VBD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", ".", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "VBG", "NN", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "RB"]]
gets worse far worse people make deliveries. extremely hard impossible convey customer delivery charge tip especially vendors used promise free delivery. greedy shop operators take cut top. drivers need paid use vehicles often get enough owners defray costs. often delivery people get compensated paltry rates inside wait staff implicit inclusion certain gratuity amount even meet minimum wage .. educated consumer ask delivery charge include gratuity costs incurred using vehicle get. educated consumer anyone orders food delivered door. educated consumer empathetic person hands food door consequently tip much
["none"]
none
1
0
bnc
It gets worse - far worse - for those people who make deliveries. It is extremely hard - if not impossible - to convey to a customer that a "delivery charge" is not a tip, especially when the vendors used to promise "free delivery". Greedy shop operators take their cut off the top. Drivers need to be paid for the use of their vehicles but often do not get enough from the owners to defray those costs. Often, too, the delivery people get compensated at the same paltry rates as inside wait staff - with the implicit inclusion of a certain gratuity amount to even meet the minimum wage.. An educated consumer will ask: "Does the delivery charge include your gratuity and the costs you incurred using your vehicle to get here?" An educated consumer should be anyone who orders any food to be delivered to his door. An educated consumer should be empathetic to the person who hands him his food at the door and, consequently tip as much as he can.
restaurants
A3353-P
tip
1
2
16,419
9,309,403
[["gets", "worse", "far", "worse", "people", "make", "deliveries"], ["extremely", "hard", "impossible", "convey", "customer", "delivery", "charge", "tip", "especially", "vendors", "used", "promise", "free", "delivery"], ["greedy", "shop", "operators", "take", "cut", "top"], ["drivers", "need", "paid", "use", "vehicles", "often", "get", "enough", "owners", "defray", "costs"], ["often", "delivery", "people", "get", "compensated", "paltry", "rates", "inside", "wait", "staff", "implicit", "inclusion", "certain", "gratuity", "amount", "even", "meet", "minimum", "wage", "..", "educated", "consumer", "ask", "delivery", "charge", "include", "gratuity", "costs", "incurred", "using", "vehicle", "get"], ["educated", "consumer", "anyone", "orders", "food", "delivered", "door"], ["educated", "consumer", "empathetic", "person", "hands", "food", "door", "consequently", "tip", "much"]]
[["VBZ", "JJR", "RB", "JJR", "NNS", "VBP", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NNS", "VBD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", ".", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "VBG", "NN", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "RB"]]
gets worse far worse people make deliveries. extremely hard impossible convey customer delivery charge tip especially vendors used promise free delivery. greedy shop operators take cut top. drivers need paid use vehicles often get enough owners defray costs. often delivery people get compensated paltry rates inside wait staff implicit inclusion certain gratuity amount even meet minimum wage .. educated consumer ask delivery charge include gratuity costs incurred using vehicle get. educated consumer anyone orders food delivered door. educated consumer empathetic person hands food door consequently tip much
["tip"]
tip
1
1
bnc
It gets worse - far worse - for those people who make deliveries. It is extremely hard - if not impossible - to convey to a customer that a "delivery charge" is not a tip, especially when the vendors used to promise "free delivery". Greedy shop operators take their cut off the top. Drivers need to be paid for the use of their vehicles but often do not get enough from the owners to defray those costs. Often, too, the delivery people get compensated at the same paltry rates as inside wait staff - with the implicit inclusion of a certain gratuity amount to even meet the minimum wage.. An educated consumer will ask: "Does the delivery charge include your gratuity and the costs you incurred using your vehicle to get here?" An educated consumer should be anyone who orders any food to be delivered to his door. An educated consumer should be empathetic to the person who hands him his food at the door and, consequently tip as much as he can.
restaurants
A3353-P
delivery driver tupping
1
3
16,420
9,309,403
[["gets", "worse", "far", "worse", "people", "make", "deliveries"], ["extremely", "hard", "impossible", "convey", "customer", "delivery", "charge", "tip", "especially", "vendors", "used", "promise", "free", "delivery"], ["greedy", "shop", "operators", "take", "cut", "top"], ["drivers", "need", "paid", "use", "vehicles", "often", "get", "enough", "owners", "defray", "costs"], ["often", "delivery", "people", "get", "compensated", "paltry", "rates", "inside", "wait", "staff", "implicit", "inclusion", "certain", "gratuity", "amount", "even", "meet", "minimum", "wage", "..", "educated", "consumer", "ask", "delivery", "charge", "include", "gratuity", "costs", "incurred", "using", "vehicle", "get"], ["educated", "consumer", "anyone", "orders", "food", "delivered", "door"], ["educated", "consumer", "empathetic", "person", "hands", "food", "door", "consequently", "tip", "much"]]
[["VBZ", "JJR", "RB", "JJR", "NNS", "VBP", "NNS"], ["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NNS", "VBD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NNS"], ["RB", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NN", ".", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "VBG", "NN", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "RB"]]
gets worse far worse people make deliveries. extremely hard impossible convey customer delivery charge tip especially vendors used promise free delivery. greedy shop operators take cut top. drivers need paid use vehicles often get enough owners defray costs. often delivery people get compensated paltry rates inside wait staff implicit inclusion certain gratuity amount even meet minimum wage .. educated consumer ask delivery charge include gratuity costs incurred using vehicle get. educated consumer anyone orders food delivered door. educated consumer empathetic person hands food door consequently tip much
["delivery", "driver", "tapping"]
delivery driver tapping
1
0
jdd
The idea behind TFA is that simply a high GPA from a prestigious university will make one a great teacher. Anybody can do the job. Ha! Within two to three years, the majority of TFA are looking for any way to get out of the classroom. Some of the more notable failures, such as DC's Michele Rhee, then can parley their brief unsuccessful experiences into becoming superintendants of major school districts. This is called school reform.
tfa
A2874-P
tfa
0
1
17,772
2,264,284
[["idea", "behind", "tfa", "simply", "high", "gpa", "prestigious", "university", "make", "one", "great", "teacher"], ["anybody", "job"], ["ha"], ["within", "two", "three", "years", "majority", "tfa", "looking", "way", "get", "classroom"], ["notable", "failures", "dc", "'s", "michele", "rhee", "parley", "brief", "unsuccessful", "experiences", "becoming", "superintendants", "major", "school", "districts"], ["called", "school", "reform"]]
[["NN", "IN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN"], ["UH"], ["IN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "POS", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBN", "NN", "NN"]]
idea behind tfa simply high gpa prestigious university make one great teacher. anybody job. ha. within two three years majority tfa looking way get classroom. notable failures dc 's michele rhee parley brief unsuccessful experiences becoming superintendants major school districts. called school reform
["tfa"]
tfa
1
1
jdd
The idea behind TFA is that simply a high GPA from a prestigious university will make one a great teacher. Anybody can do the job. Ha! Within two to three years, the majority of TFA are looking for any way to get out of the classroom. Some of the more notable failures, such as DC's Michele Rhee, then can parley their brief unsuccessful experiences into becoming superintendants of major school districts. This is called school reform.
tfa
A2874-P
teachers for america
1
3
17,773
2,264,284
[["idea", "behind", "tfa", "simply", "high", "gpa", "prestigious", "university", "make", "one", "great", "teacher"], ["anybody", "job"], ["ha"], ["within", "two", "three", "years", "majority", "tfa", "looking", "way", "get", "classroom"], ["notable", "failures", "dc", "'s", "michele", "rhee", "parley", "brief", "unsuccessful", "experiences", "becoming", "superintendants", "major", "school", "districts"], ["called", "school", "reform"]]
[["NN", "IN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN"], ["UH"], ["IN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "POS", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBN", "NN", "NN"]]
idea behind tfa simply high gpa prestigious university make one great teacher. anybody job. ha. within two three years majority tfa looking way get classroom. notable failures dc 's michele rhee parley brief unsuccessful experiences becoming superintendants major school districts. called school reform
["teacher", "america"]
teacher america
1
0
jdd
The idea behind TFA is that simply a high GPA from a prestigious university will make one a great teacher. Anybody can do the job. Ha! Within two to three years, the majority of TFA are looking for any way to get out of the classroom. Some of the more notable failures, such as DC's Michele Rhee, then can parley their brief unsuccessful experiences into becoming superintendants of major school districts. This is called school reform.
tfa
A2874-P
tfa
0
3
17,774
2,264,284
[["idea", "behind", "tfa", "simply", "high", "gpa", "prestigious", "university", "make", "one", "great", "teacher"], ["anybody", "job"], ["ha"], ["within", "two", "three", "years", "majority", "tfa", "looking", "way", "get", "classroom"], ["notable", "failures", "dc", "'s", "michele", "rhee", "parley", "brief", "unsuccessful", "experiences", "becoming", "superintendants", "major", "school", "districts"], ["called", "school", "reform"]]
[["NN", "IN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN"], ["UH"], ["IN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "POS", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBN", "NN", "NN"]]
idea behind tfa simply high gpa prestigious university make one great teacher. anybody job. ha. within two three years majority tfa looking way get classroom. notable failures dc 's michele rhee parley brief unsuccessful experiences becoming superintendants major school districts. called school reform
["tfa"]
tfa
1
1
jdd
The idea behind TFA is that simply a high GPA from a prestigious university will make one a great teacher. Anybody can do the job. Ha! Within two to three years, the majority of TFA are looking for any way to get out of the classroom. Some of the more notable failures, such as DC's Michele Rhee, then can parley their brief unsuccessful experiences into becoming superintendants of major school districts. This is called school reform.
the status of teachers
A2875-P
the status of teachers
0
1
17,780
2,264,284
[["idea", "behind", "tfa", "simply", "high", "gpa", "prestigious", "university", "make", "one", "great", "teacher"], ["anybody", "job"], ["ha"], ["within", "two", "three", "years", "majority", "tfa", "looking", "way", "get", "classroom"], ["notable", "failures", "dc", "'s", "michele", "rhee", "parley", "brief", "unsuccessful", "experiences", "becoming", "superintendants", "major", "school", "districts"], ["called", "school", "reform"]]
[["NN", "IN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN"], ["UH"], ["IN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "POS", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBN", "NN", "NN"]]
idea behind tfa simply high gpa prestigious university make one great teacher. anybody job. ha. within two three years majority tfa looking way get classroom. notable failures dc 's michele rhee parley brief unsuccessful experiences becoming superintendants major school districts. called school reform
["status", "teacher"]
status teacher
1
0
jdd
The idea behind TFA is that simply a high GPA from a prestigious university will make one a great teacher. Anybody can do the job. Ha! Within two to three years, the majority of TFA are looking for any way to get out of the classroom. Some of the more notable failures, such as DC's Michele Rhee, then can parley their brief unsuccessful experiences into becoming superintendants of major school districts. This is called school reform.
the status of teachers
A2875-P
tfa
0
3
17,781
2,264,284
[["idea", "behind", "tfa", "simply", "high", "gpa", "prestigious", "university", "make", "one", "great", "teacher"], ["anybody", "job"], ["ha"], ["within", "two", "three", "years", "majority", "tfa", "looking", "way", "get", "classroom"], ["notable", "failures", "dc", "'s", "michele", "rhee", "parley", "brief", "unsuccessful", "experiences", "becoming", "superintendants", "major", "school", "districts"], ["called", "school", "reform"]]
[["NN", "IN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN"], ["UH"], ["IN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "POS", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBN", "NN", "NN"]]
idea behind tfa simply high gpa prestigious university make one great teacher. anybody job. ha. within two three years majority tfa looking way get classroom. notable failures dc 's michele rhee parley brief unsuccessful experiences becoming superintendants major school districts. called school reform
["tfa"]
tfa
1
1
jdd
The idea behind TFA is that simply a high GPA from a prestigious university will make one a great teacher. Anybody can do the job. Ha! Within two to three years, the majority of TFA are looking for any way to get out of the classroom. Some of the more notable failures, such as DC's Michele Rhee, then can parley their brief unsuccessful experiences into becoming superintendants of major school districts. This is called school reform.
the status of teachers
A2875-P
tfa
0
2
17,782
2,264,284
[["idea", "behind", "tfa", "simply", "high", "gpa", "prestigious", "university", "make", "one", "great", "teacher"], ["anybody", "job"], ["ha"], ["within", "two", "three", "years", "majority", "tfa", "looking", "way", "get", "classroom"], ["notable", "failures", "dc", "'s", "michele", "rhee", "parley", "brief", "unsuccessful", "experiences", "becoming", "superintendants", "major", "school", "districts"], ["called", "school", "reform"]]
[["NN", "IN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN"], ["UH"], ["IN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "POS", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBN", "NN", "NN"]]
idea behind tfa simply high gpa prestigious university make one great teacher. anybody job. ha. within two three years majority tfa looking way get classroom. notable failures dc 's michele rhee parley brief unsuccessful experiences becoming superintendants major school districts. called school reform
["tfa"]
tfa
1
1
jdd
The idea behind TFA is that simply a high GPA from a prestigious university will make one a great teacher. Anybody can do the job. Ha! Within two to three years, the majority of TFA are looking for any way to get out of the classroom. Some of the more notable failures, such as DC's Michele Rhee, then can parley their brief unsuccessful experiences into becoming superintendants of major school districts. This is called school reform.
the status of teachers
A2875-P
teacher
0
3
17,783
2,264,284
[["idea", "behind", "tfa", "simply", "high", "gpa", "prestigious", "university", "make", "one", "great", "teacher"], ["anybody", "job"], ["ha"], ["within", "two", "three", "years", "majority", "tfa", "looking", "way", "get", "classroom"], ["notable", "failures", "dc", "'s", "michele", "rhee", "parley", "brief", "unsuccessful", "experiences", "becoming", "superintendants", "major", "school", "districts"], ["called", "school", "reform"]]
[["NN", "IN", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "PRP", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN"], ["UH"], ["IN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NNP", "POS", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBN", "NN", "NN"]]
idea behind tfa simply high gpa prestigious university make one great teacher. anybody job. ha. within two three years majority tfa looking way get classroom. notable failures dc 's michele rhee parley brief unsuccessful experiences becoming superintendants major school districts. called school reform
["teacher"]
teacher
1
1
Mark
There isn't enough Lithium, nickel and other minerals to manufacture the volume of batteries they are talking about. Any day now they'll be a lithium cartel forming in the image of OPEC and we'll be in the same bad situation. Hydrogen is the best solution. Talk about the lack of infrastructure for Hydrogen is just defeatist nonsense designed to maintain the status quo for the good of those who profit from it. Nobody used the lack of public charging stations or the lack of infrastructure for disposing/recycling used batteries as an excuse to stop the Batteries. In a decade we transformed the landscape with cell towers and converted our society to a mobile one and we can do the same with Hydrogen.
electric cars
A3893-P
electric cars
1
1
14,046
2,657,505
[["n't", "enough", "lithium", "nickel", "minerals", "manufacture", "volume", "batteries", "talking"], ["day", "'ll", "lithium", "cartel", "forming", "image", "opec", "'ll", "bad", "situation"], ["hydrogen", "best", "solution"], ["talk", "lack", "infrastructure", "hydrogen", "defeatist", "nonsense", "designed", "maintain", "status", "quo", "good", "profit"], ["nobody", "used", "lack", "public", "charging", "stations", "lack", "infrastructure", "disposing", "recycling", "used", "batteries", "excuse", "stop", "batteries"], ["decade", "transformed", "landscape", "cell", "towers", "converted", "society", "mobile", "one", "hydrogen"]]
[["RB", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NN", "MD", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNP", "MD", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJS", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP"], ["NN", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNPS"], ["NN", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP"]]
n't enough lithium nickel minerals manufacture volume batteries talking. day 'll lithium cartel forming image opec 'll bad situation. hydrogen best solution. talk lack infrastructure hydrogen defeatist nonsense designed maintain status quo good profit. nobody used lack public charging stations lack infrastructure disposing recycling used batteries excuse stop batteries. decade transformed landscape cell towers converted society mobile one hydrogen
["electric", "car"]
electric car
1
0
Mark
There isn't enough Lithium, nickel and other minerals to manufacture the volume of batteries they are talking about. Any day now they'll be a lithium cartel forming in the image of OPEC and we'll be in the same bad situation. Hydrogen is the best solution. Talk about the lack of infrastructure for Hydrogen is just defeatist nonsense designed to maintain the status quo for the good of those who profit from it. Nobody used the lack of public charging stations or the lack of infrastructure for disposing/recycling used batteries as an excuse to stop the Batteries. In a decade we transformed the landscape with cell towers and converted our society to a mobile one and we can do the same with Hydrogen.
electric cars
A3893-P
battery
1
3
14,047
2,657,505
[["n't", "enough", "lithium", "nickel", "minerals", "manufacture", "volume", "batteries", "talking"], ["day", "'ll", "lithium", "cartel", "forming", "image", "opec", "'ll", "bad", "situation"], ["hydrogen", "best", "solution"], ["talk", "lack", "infrastructure", "hydrogen", "defeatist", "nonsense", "designed", "maintain", "status", "quo", "good", "profit"], ["nobody", "used", "lack", "public", "charging", "stations", "lack", "infrastructure", "disposing", "recycling", "used", "batteries", "excuse", "stop", "batteries"], ["decade", "transformed", "landscape", "cell", "towers", "converted", "society", "mobile", "one", "hydrogen"]]
[["RB", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NN", "MD", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNP", "MD", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJS", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP"], ["NN", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNPS"], ["NN", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP"]]
n't enough lithium nickel minerals manufacture volume batteries talking. day 'll lithium cartel forming image opec 'll bad situation. hydrogen best solution. talk lack infrastructure hydrogen defeatist nonsense designed maintain status quo good profit. nobody used lack public charging stations lack infrastructure disposing recycling used batteries excuse stop batteries. decade transformed landscape cell towers converted society mobile one hydrogen
["battery"]
battery
1
0
Mark
There isn't enough Lithium, nickel and other minerals to manufacture the volume of batteries they are talking about. Any day now they'll be a lithium cartel forming in the image of OPEC and we'll be in the same bad situation. Hydrogen is the best solution. Talk about the lack of infrastructure for Hydrogen is just defeatist nonsense designed to maintain the status quo for the good of those who profit from it. Nobody used the lack of public charging stations or the lack of infrastructure for disposing/recycling used batteries as an excuse to stop the Batteries. In a decade we transformed the landscape with cell towers and converted our society to a mobile one and we can do the same with Hydrogen.
electric cars
A3893-P
hydrogen
1
2
14,048
2,657,505
[["n't", "enough", "lithium", "nickel", "minerals", "manufacture", "volume", "batteries", "talking"], ["day", "'ll", "lithium", "cartel", "forming", "image", "opec", "'ll", "bad", "situation"], ["hydrogen", "best", "solution"], ["talk", "lack", "infrastructure", "hydrogen", "defeatist", "nonsense", "designed", "maintain", "status", "quo", "good", "profit"], ["nobody", "used", "lack", "public", "charging", "stations", "lack", "infrastructure", "disposing", "recycling", "used", "batteries", "excuse", "stop", "batteries"], ["decade", "transformed", "landscape", "cell", "towers", "converted", "society", "mobile", "one", "hydrogen"]]
[["RB", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NN", "MD", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNP", "MD", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJS", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP"], ["NN", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNPS"], ["NN", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP"]]
n't enough lithium nickel minerals manufacture volume batteries talking. day 'll lithium cartel forming image opec 'll bad situation. hydrogen best solution. talk lack infrastructure hydrogen defeatist nonsense designed maintain status quo good profit. nobody used lack public charging stations lack infrastructure disposing recycling used batteries excuse stop batteries. decade transformed landscape cell towers converted society mobile one hydrogen
["hydrogen"]
hydrogen
1
1
Mark
There isn't enough Lithium, nickel and other minerals to manufacture the volume of batteries they are talking about. Any day now they'll be a lithium cartel forming in the image of OPEC and we'll be in the same bad situation. Hydrogen is the best solution. Talk about the lack of infrastructure for Hydrogen is just defeatist nonsense designed to maintain the status quo for the good of those who profit from it. Nobody used the lack of public charging stations or the lack of infrastructure for disposing/recycling used batteries as an excuse to stop the Batteries. In a decade we transformed the landscape with cell towers and converted our society to a mobile one and we can do the same with Hydrogen.
electric cars
A3893-P
hydrogen energy
1
2
14,049
2,657,505
[["n't", "enough", "lithium", "nickel", "minerals", "manufacture", "volume", "batteries", "talking"], ["day", "'ll", "lithium", "cartel", "forming", "image", "opec", "'ll", "bad", "situation"], ["hydrogen", "best", "solution"], ["talk", "lack", "infrastructure", "hydrogen", "defeatist", "nonsense", "designed", "maintain", "status", "quo", "good", "profit"], ["nobody", "used", "lack", "public", "charging", "stations", "lack", "infrastructure", "disposing", "recycling", "used", "batteries", "excuse", "stop", "batteries"], ["decade", "transformed", "landscape", "cell", "towers", "converted", "society", "mobile", "one", "hydrogen"]]
[["RB", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NN", "MD", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNP", "MD", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJS", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP"], ["NN", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNPS"], ["NN", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP"]]
n't enough lithium nickel minerals manufacture volume batteries talking. day 'll lithium cartel forming image opec 'll bad situation. hydrogen best solution. talk lack infrastructure hydrogen defeatist nonsense designed maintain status quo good profit. nobody used lack public charging stations lack infrastructure disposing recycling used batteries excuse stop batteries. decade transformed landscape cell towers converted society mobile one hydrogen
["hydrogen", "energy"]
hydrogen energy
1
0
Mark
There isn't enough Lithium, nickel and other minerals to manufacture the volume of batteries they are talking about. Any day now they'll be a lithium cartel forming in the image of OPEC and we'll be in the same bad situation. Hydrogen is the best solution. Talk about the lack of infrastructure for Hydrogen is just defeatist nonsense designed to maintain the status quo for the good of those who profit from it. Nobody used the lack of public charging stations or the lack of infrastructure for disposing/recycling used batteries as an excuse to stop the Batteries. In a decade we transformed the landscape with cell towers and converted our society to a mobile one and we can do the same with Hydrogen.
electric cars
A3893-P
battery
1
3
14,050
2,657,505
[["n't", "enough", "lithium", "nickel", "minerals", "manufacture", "volume", "batteries", "talking"], ["day", "'ll", "lithium", "cartel", "forming", "image", "opec", "'ll", "bad", "situation"], ["hydrogen", "best", "solution"], ["talk", "lack", "infrastructure", "hydrogen", "defeatist", "nonsense", "designed", "maintain", "status", "quo", "good", "profit"], ["nobody", "used", "lack", "public", "charging", "stations", "lack", "infrastructure", "disposing", "recycling", "used", "batteries", "excuse", "stop", "batteries"], ["decade", "transformed", "landscape", "cell", "towers", "converted", "society", "mobile", "one", "hydrogen"]]
[["RB", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NN", "MD", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNP", "MD", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJS", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP"], ["NN", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNPS"], ["NN", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP"]]
n't enough lithium nickel minerals manufacture volume batteries talking. day 'll lithium cartel forming image opec 'll bad situation. hydrogen best solution. talk lack infrastructure hydrogen defeatist nonsense designed maintain status quo good profit. nobody used lack public charging stations lack infrastructure disposing recycling used batteries excuse stop batteries. decade transformed landscape cell towers converted society mobile one hydrogen
["battery"]
battery
1
0
Mark
There isn't enough Lithium, nickel and other minerals to manufacture the volume of batteries they are talking about. Any day now they'll be a lithium cartel forming in the image of OPEC and we'll be in the same bad situation. Hydrogen is the best solution. Talk about the lack of infrastructure for Hydrogen is just defeatist nonsense designed to maintain the status quo for the good of those who profit from it. Nobody used the lack of public charging stations or the lack of infrastructure for disposing/recycling used batteries as an excuse to stop the Batteries. In a decade we transformed the landscape with cell towers and converted our society to a mobile one and we can do the same with Hydrogen.
electric cars
A3893-P
hydrogen
1
3
14,051
2,657,505
[["n't", "enough", "lithium", "nickel", "minerals", "manufacture", "volume", "batteries", "talking"], ["day", "'ll", "lithium", "cartel", "forming", "image", "opec", "'ll", "bad", "situation"], ["hydrogen", "best", "solution"], ["talk", "lack", "infrastructure", "hydrogen", "defeatist", "nonsense", "designed", "maintain", "status", "quo", "good", "profit"], ["nobody", "used", "lack", "public", "charging", "stations", "lack", "infrastructure", "disposing", "recycling", "used", "batteries", "excuse", "stop", "batteries"], ["decade", "transformed", "landscape", "cell", "towers", "converted", "society", "mobile", "one", "hydrogen"]]
[["RB", "JJ", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NN", "MD", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNP", "MD", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJS", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP"], ["NN", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "NNPS"], ["NN", "VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP"]]
n't enough lithium nickel minerals manufacture volume batteries talking. day 'll lithium cartel forming image opec 'll bad situation. hydrogen best solution. talk lack infrastructure hydrogen defeatist nonsense designed maintain status quo good profit. nobody used lack public charging stations lack infrastructure disposing recycling used batteries excuse stop batteries. decade transformed landscape cell towers converted society mobile one hydrogen
["hydrogen"]
hydrogen
1
1
Brian
There is far too much intellectual relativism being discussed in this thread. What was once considered to be valuable to intelligence is not exactly the same now. We need to get over this idea of "well, my kids do not even know all the state capitals!" Of course they don't. There is no need to know something off the top of your head in an age when you can look it up instantly. The information that is "vital" to a person's intelligence is directly related to what they need to know to function well in their field. I teach English, I know nothing about welding. A welder may know very little about literature. Is one of us smarter than the other?
people
A1842-P
people
1
1
13,268
5,614,822
[["far", "much", "intellectual", "relativism", "discussed", "thread"], ["considered", "valuable", "intelligence", "exactly"], ["need", "get", "idea", "well", "kids", "even", "know", "state", "capitals"], ["course", "n't"], ["need", "know", "something", "top", "head", "age", "look", "instantly"], ["information", "vital", "person", "'s", "intelligence", "directly", "related", "need", "know", "function", "well", "field"], ["teach", "english", "know", "nothing", "welding"], ["welder", "may", "know", "little", "literature"], ["one", "us", "smarter"]]
[["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["VBN", "JJ", "NN", "RB"], ["VBP", "VB", "NN", "UH", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "RB"], ["NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "POS", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "RB", "NN"], ["VBP", "NNP", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["WDT", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["CD", "PRP", "RBR"]]
far much intellectual relativism discussed thread. considered valuable intelligence exactly. need get idea well kids even know state capitals. course n't. need know something top head age look instantly. information vital person 's intelligence directly related need know function well field. teach english know nothing welding. welder may know little literature. one us smarter
["people"]
people
1
0
Brian
There is far too much intellectual relativism being discussed in this thread. What was once considered to be valuable to intelligence is not exactly the same now. We need to get over this idea of "well, my kids do not even know all the state capitals!" Of course they don't. There is no need to know something off the top of your head in an age when you can look it up instantly. The information that is "vital" to a person's intelligence is directly related to what they need to know to function well in their field. I teach English, I know nothing about welding. A welder may know very little about literature. Is one of us smarter than the other?
people
A1842-P
intellectual relativism
1
3
13,269
5,614,822
[["far", "much", "intellectual", "relativism", "discussed", "thread"], ["considered", "valuable", "intelligence", "exactly"], ["need", "get", "idea", "well", "kids", "even", "know", "state", "capitals"], ["course", "n't"], ["need", "know", "something", "top", "head", "age", "look", "instantly"], ["information", "vital", "person", "'s", "intelligence", "directly", "related", "need", "know", "function", "well", "field"], ["teach", "english", "know", "nothing", "welding"], ["welder", "may", "know", "little", "literature"], ["one", "us", "smarter"]]
[["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["VBN", "JJ", "NN", "RB"], ["VBP", "VB", "NN", "UH", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "RB"], ["NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "POS", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "RB", "NN"], ["VBP", "NNP", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["WDT", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["CD", "PRP", "RBR"]]
far much intellectual relativism discussed thread. considered valuable intelligence exactly. need get idea well kids even know state capitals. course n't. need know something top head age look instantly. information vital person 's intelligence directly related need know function well field. teach english know nothing welding. welder may know little literature. one us smarter
["intellectual", "relativism"]
intellectual relativism
1
1
Brian
There is far too much intellectual relativism being discussed in this thread. What was once considered to be valuable to intelligence is not exactly the same now. We need to get over this idea of "well, my kids do not even know all the state capitals!" Of course they don't. There is no need to know something off the top of your head in an age when you can look it up instantly. The information that is "vital" to a person's intelligence is directly related to what they need to know to function well in their field. I teach English, I know nothing about welding. A welder may know very little about literature. Is one of us smarter than the other?
people
A1842-P
change school curriculum
1
2
13,270
5,614,822
[["far", "much", "intellectual", "relativism", "discussed", "thread"], ["considered", "valuable", "intelligence", "exactly"], ["need", "get", "idea", "well", "kids", "even", "know", "state", "capitals"], ["course", "n't"], ["need", "know", "something", "top", "head", "age", "look", "instantly"], ["information", "vital", "person", "'s", "intelligence", "directly", "related", "need", "know", "function", "well", "field"], ["teach", "english", "know", "nothing", "welding"], ["welder", "may", "know", "little", "literature"], ["one", "us", "smarter"]]
[["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["VBN", "JJ", "NN", "RB"], ["VBP", "VB", "NN", "UH", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "RB"], ["NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "POS", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "RB", "NN"], ["VBP", "NNP", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["WDT", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["CD", "PRP", "RBR"]]
far much intellectual relativism discussed thread. considered valuable intelligence exactly. need get idea well kids even know state capitals. course n't. need know something top head age look instantly. information vital person 's intelligence directly related need know function well field. teach english know nothing welding. welder may know little literature. one us smarter
["change", "school", "curriculum"]
change school curriculum
1
0
Brian
There is far too much intellectual relativism being discussed in this thread. What was once considered to be valuable to intelligence is not exactly the same now. We need to get over this idea of "well, my kids do not even know all the state capitals!" Of course they don't. There is no need to know something off the top of your head in an age when you can look it up instantly. The information that is "vital" to a person's intelligence is directly related to what they need to know to function well in their field. I teach English, I know nothing about welding. A welder may know very little about literature. Is one of us smarter than the other?
people
A1842-P
school
1
3
13,271
5,614,822
[["far", "much", "intellectual", "relativism", "discussed", "thread"], ["considered", "valuable", "intelligence", "exactly"], ["need", "get", "idea", "well", "kids", "even", "know", "state", "capitals"], ["course", "n't"], ["need", "know", "something", "top", "head", "age", "look", "instantly"], ["information", "vital", "person", "'s", "intelligence", "directly", "related", "need", "know", "function", "well", "field"], ["teach", "english", "know", "nothing", "welding"], ["welder", "may", "know", "little", "literature"], ["one", "us", "smarter"]]
[["RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["VBN", "JJ", "NN", "RB"], ["VBP", "VB", "NN", "UH", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "RB"], ["NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "POS", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "RB", "NN"], ["VBP", "NNP", "VBP", "NN", "NN"], ["WDT", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["CD", "PRP", "RBR"]]
far much intellectual relativism discussed thread. considered valuable intelligence exactly. need get idea well kids even know state capitals. course n't. need know something top head age look instantly. information vital person 's intelligence directly related need know function well field. teach english know nothing welding. welder may know little literature. one us smarter
["school"]
school
1
0
Hamish
There is no economic argument for taxing income differently, depending on its source; income is income. Such arguments as we typically hear are theological debates, whose partisans hope to pave their way to a personal vision of heaven. The double taxation argument is groundless; in the first case there are many other examples of double taxation, and in the second empirical evidence does not support conservative claims about disincentives. One could also argue that the tax on labor is a disincentive to work, but for some reason that seems to have less traction - could it be because wealthy people - whose right to speak more loudly than the rest of us was recently codified by the Supreme Court - are less concerned about it? From a strict economic viewpoint, all income should be taxed equally. This would avoid the huge incentives - and wasted, non-productive investments - in gaming the system, that firms and investors routinely make. The opportunity costs of those activities are literally mind boggling - but never discussed.
capital gains
A2212-P
capital gains
0
1
87
6,892,783
[["economic", "argument", "taxing", "income", "differently", "depending", "source", "income", "income"], ["arguments", "typically", "hear", "theological", "debates", "whose", "partisans", "hope", "pave", "way", "personal", "vision", "heaven"], ["double", "taxation", "argument", "groundless", "first", "case", "many", "examples", "double", "taxation", "second", "empirical", "evidence", "support", "conservative", "claims", "disincentives"], ["one", "could", "also", "argue", "tax", "labor", "disincentive", "work", "reason", "seems", "less", "traction", "could", "wealthy", "people", "whose", "right", "speak", "loudly", "rest", "us", "recently", "codified", "supreme", "court", "less", "concerned"], ["strict", "economic", "viewpoint", "income", "taxed", "equally"], ["would", "avoid", "huge", "incentives", "wasted", "non", "productive", "investments", "gaming", "system", "firms", "investors", "routinely", "make"], ["opportunity", "costs", "activities", "literally", "mind", "boggling", "never", "discussed"]]
[["JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "WP$", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS"], ["PRP", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "JJR", "NN", "MD", "JJ", "NNS", "WP$", "NN", "VB", "RB", "NN", "PRP", "RB", "VBN", "NNP", "NNP", "RBR", "JJ"], ["JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "RB"], ["MD", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "AFX", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "RB", "VBP"], ["NN", "NNS", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "VBG", "RB", "VBN"]]
economic argument taxing income differently depending source income income. arguments typically hear theological debates whose partisans hope pave way personal vision heaven. double taxation argument groundless first case many examples double taxation second empirical evidence support conservative claims disincentives. one could also argue tax labor disincentive work reason seems less traction could wealthy people whose right speak loudly rest us recently codified supreme court less concerned. strict economic viewpoint income taxed equally. would avoid huge incentives wasted non productive investments gaming system firms investors routinely make. opportunity costs activities literally mind boggling never discussed
["capital", "gain"]
capital gain
1
0
Hamish
There is no economic argument for taxing income differently, depending on its source; income is income. Such arguments as we typically hear are theological debates, whose partisans hope to pave their way to a personal vision of heaven. The double taxation argument is groundless; in the first case there are many other examples of double taxation, and in the second empirical evidence does not support conservative claims about disincentives. One could also argue that the tax on labor is a disincentive to work, but for some reason that seems to have less traction - could it be because wealthy people - whose right to speak more loudly than the rest of us was recently codified by the Supreme Court - are less concerned about it? From a strict economic viewpoint, all income should be taxed equally. This would avoid the huge incentives - and wasted, non-productive investments - in gaming the system, that firms and investors routinely make. The opportunity costs of those activities are literally mind boggling - but never discussed.
capital gains
A2212-P
taxation
1
3
88
6,892,783
[["economic", "argument", "taxing", "income", "differently", "depending", "source", "income", "income"], ["arguments", "typically", "hear", "theological", "debates", "whose", "partisans", "hope", "pave", "way", "personal", "vision", "heaven"], ["double", "taxation", "argument", "groundless", "first", "case", "many", "examples", "double", "taxation", "second", "empirical", "evidence", "support", "conservative", "claims", "disincentives"], ["one", "could", "also", "argue", "tax", "labor", "disincentive", "work", "reason", "seems", "less", "traction", "could", "wealthy", "people", "whose", "right", "speak", "loudly", "rest", "us", "recently", "codified", "supreme", "court", "less", "concerned"], ["strict", "economic", "viewpoint", "income", "taxed", "equally"], ["would", "avoid", "huge", "incentives", "wasted", "non", "productive", "investments", "gaming", "system", "firms", "investors", "routinely", "make"], ["opportunity", "costs", "activities", "literally", "mind", "boggling", "never", "discussed"]]
[["JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "WP$", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS"], ["PRP", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "JJR", "NN", "MD", "JJ", "NNS", "WP$", "NN", "VB", "RB", "NN", "PRP", "RB", "VBN", "NNP", "NNP", "RBR", "JJ"], ["JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "RB"], ["MD", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "AFX", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "RB", "VBP"], ["NN", "NNS", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "VBG", "RB", "VBN"]]
economic argument taxing income differently depending source income income. arguments typically hear theological debates whose partisans hope pave way personal vision heaven. double taxation argument groundless first case many examples double taxation second empirical evidence support conservative claims disincentives. one could also argue tax labor disincentive work reason seems less traction could wealthy people whose right speak loudly rest us recently codified supreme court less concerned. strict economic viewpoint income taxed equally. would avoid huge incentives wasted non productive investments gaming system firms investors routinely make. opportunity costs activities literally mind boggling never discussed
["taxation"]
taxation
1
1
Hamish
There is no economic argument for taxing income differently, depending on its source; income is income. Such arguments as we typically hear are theological debates, whose partisans hope to pave their way to a personal vision of heaven. The double taxation argument is groundless; in the first case there are many other examples of double taxation, and in the second empirical evidence does not support conservative claims about disincentives. One could also argue that the tax on labor is a disincentive to work, but for some reason that seems to have less traction - could it be because wealthy people - whose right to speak more loudly than the rest of us was recently codified by the Supreme Court - are less concerned about it? From a strict economic viewpoint, all income should be taxed equally. This would avoid the huge incentives - and wasted, non-productive investments - in gaming the system, that firms and investors routinely make. The opportunity costs of those activities are literally mind boggling - but never discussed.
capital gains
A2212-P
income tax
0
3
89
6,892,783
[["economic", "argument", "taxing", "income", "differently", "depending", "source", "income", "income"], ["arguments", "typically", "hear", "theological", "debates", "whose", "partisans", "hope", "pave", "way", "personal", "vision", "heaven"], ["double", "taxation", "argument", "groundless", "first", "case", "many", "examples", "double", "taxation", "second", "empirical", "evidence", "support", "conservative", "claims", "disincentives"], ["one", "could", "also", "argue", "tax", "labor", "disincentive", "work", "reason", "seems", "less", "traction", "could", "wealthy", "people", "whose", "right", "speak", "loudly", "rest", "us", "recently", "codified", "supreme", "court", "less", "concerned"], ["strict", "economic", "viewpoint", "income", "taxed", "equally"], ["would", "avoid", "huge", "incentives", "wasted", "non", "productive", "investments", "gaming", "system", "firms", "investors", "routinely", "make"], ["opportunity", "costs", "activities", "literally", "mind", "boggling", "never", "discussed"]]
[["JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "WP$", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NNS"], ["PRP", "MD", "RB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "JJR", "NN", "MD", "JJ", "NNS", "WP$", "NN", "VB", "RB", "NN", "PRP", "RB", "VBN", "NNP", "NNP", "RBR", "JJ"], ["JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "RB"], ["MD", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "AFX", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "NNS", "RB", "VBP"], ["NN", "NNS", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "VBG", "RB", "VBN"]]
economic argument taxing income differently depending source income income. arguments typically hear theological debates whose partisans hope pave way personal vision heaven. double taxation argument groundless first case many examples double taxation second empirical evidence support conservative claims disincentives. one could also argue tax labor disincentive work reason seems less traction could wealthy people whose right speak loudly rest us recently codified supreme court less concerned. strict economic viewpoint income taxed equally. would avoid huge incentives wasted non productive investments gaming system firms investors routinely make. opportunity costs activities literally mind boggling never discussed
["income", "tax"]
income tax
1
1
Dan
What are these " certain standards of responsibility and commitment?" I can only recall an age requirement. And why is it that conservatives always want a big government program to restrict individual liberty? Any idea of the cost providing each ex-con a review to determine if they have reformed enough to vote? People even current convicts should be allowed, yea encouraged, to vote or we do not have a democracy.
felons
A4976-P
felons
1
1
9,438
18,320,629
[["certain", "standards", "responsibility", "commitment"], ["recall", "age", "requirement"], ["conservatives", "always", "want", "big", "government", "program", "restrict", "individual", "liberty"], ["idea", "cost", "providing", "ex", "con", "review", "determine", "reformed", "enough", "vote"], ["people", "even", "current", "convicts", "allowed", "yea", "encouraged", "vote", "democracy"]]
[["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBG", "CD", "FW", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "RB", "VB"], ["NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "PRP", "VBD", "VB", "NN"]]
certain standards responsibility commitment. recall age requirement. conservatives always want big government program restrict individual liberty. idea cost providing ex con review determine reformed enough vote. people even current convicts allowed yea encouraged vote democracy
["felon"]
felon
1
0
Dan
What are these " certain standards of responsibility and commitment?" I can only recall an age requirement. And why is it that conservatives always want a big government program to restrict individual liberty? Any idea of the cost providing each ex-con a review to determine if they have reformed enough to vote? People even current convicts should be allowed, yea encouraged, to vote or we do not have a democracy.
felons
A4976-P
convict
1
3
9,439
18,320,629
[["certain", "standards", "responsibility", "commitment"], ["recall", "age", "requirement"], ["conservatives", "always", "want", "big", "government", "program", "restrict", "individual", "liberty"], ["idea", "cost", "providing", "ex", "con", "review", "determine", "reformed", "enough", "vote"], ["people", "even", "current", "convicts", "allowed", "yea", "encouraged", "vote", "democracy"]]
[["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBG", "CD", "FW", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "RB", "VB"], ["NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "PRP", "VBD", "VB", "NN"]]
certain standards responsibility commitment. recall age requirement. conservatives always want big government program restrict individual liberty. idea cost providing ex con review determine reformed enough vote. people even current convicts allowed yea encouraged vote democracy
["convict"]
convict
1
1
Dan
What are these " certain standards of responsibility and commitment?" I can only recall an age requirement. And why is it that conservatives always want a big government program to restrict individual liberty? Any idea of the cost providing each ex-con a review to determine if they have reformed enough to vote? People even current convicts should be allowed, yea encouraged, to vote or we do not have a democracy.
felons
A4976-P
conservative
1
3
9,440
18,320,629
[["certain", "standards", "responsibility", "commitment"], ["recall", "age", "requirement"], ["conservatives", "always", "want", "big", "government", "program", "restrict", "individual", "liberty"], ["idea", "cost", "providing", "ex", "con", "review", "determine", "reformed", "enough", "vote"], ["people", "even", "current", "convicts", "allowed", "yea", "encouraged", "vote", "democracy"]]
[["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NN", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBG", "CD", "FW", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "RB", "VB"], ["NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "PRP", "VBD", "VB", "NN"]]
certain standards responsibility commitment. recall age requirement. conservatives always want big government program restrict individual liberty. idea cost providing ex con review determine reformed enough vote. people even current convicts allowed yea encouraged vote democracy
["conservative"]
conservative
1
1
GMBHanson
"Establishing it as a third legal drug, along with tobacco and alcohol, will increase drug abuse, including the expanding opioid epidemic." Well, if the problem is that legalizing Marijuana will make for three legal drugs...then why don't we make tobacco illegal, or alcohol. Both of those drugs have vastly more deaths attributed to them than marijuana ever has. Hate these scare tactics.
a gateway drug
A3832-P
marijuana legalization
1
2
5,926
18,337,016
[["establishing", "third", "legal", "drug", "along", "tobacco", "alcohol", "increase", "drug", "abuse", "including", "expanding", "opioid", "epidemic"], ["well", "problem", "legalizing", "marijuana", "make", "three", "legal", "drugs", "...", "n't", "make", "tobacco", "illegal", "alcohol"], ["drugs", "vastly", "deaths", "attributed", "marijuana", "ever"], ["hate", "scare", "tactics"]]
[["VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "NN", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "NFP", "RB", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "RB"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS"]]
establishing third legal drug along tobacco alcohol increase drug abuse including expanding opioid epidemic. well problem legalizing marijuana make three legal drugs ... n't make tobacco illegal alcohol. drugs vastly deaths attributed marijuana ever. hate scare tactics
["marijuana", "legalization"]
marijuana legalization
1
0
GMBHanson
"Establishing it as a third legal drug, along with tobacco and alcohol, will increase drug abuse, including the expanding opioid epidemic." Well, if the problem is that legalizing Marijuana will make for three legal drugs...then why don't we make tobacco illegal, or alcohol. Both of those drugs have vastly more deaths attributed to them than marijuana ever has. Hate these scare tactics.
a gateway drug
A3832-P
legalized drugs
1
3
5,927
18,337,016
[["establishing", "third", "legal", "drug", "along", "tobacco", "alcohol", "increase", "drug", "abuse", "including", "expanding", "opioid", "epidemic"], ["well", "problem", "legalizing", "marijuana", "make", "three", "legal", "drugs", "...", "n't", "make", "tobacco", "illegal", "alcohol"], ["drugs", "vastly", "deaths", "attributed", "marijuana", "ever"], ["hate", "scare", "tactics"]]
[["VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "NN", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "NFP", "RB", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "RB"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS"]]
establishing third legal drug along tobacco alcohol increase drug abuse including expanding opioid epidemic. well problem legalizing marijuana make three legal drugs ... n't make tobacco illegal alcohol. drugs vastly deaths attributed marijuana ever. hate scare tactics
["legalized", "drug"]
legalized drug
1
0
GMBHanson
"Establishing it as a third legal drug, along with tobacco and alcohol, will increase drug abuse, including the expanding opioid epidemic." Well, if the problem is that legalizing Marijuana will make for three legal drugs...then why don't we make tobacco illegal, or alcohol. Both of those drugs have vastly more deaths attributed to them than marijuana ever has. Hate these scare tactics.
a gateway drug
A3832-P
scare tactics
1
3
5,928
18,337,016
[["establishing", "third", "legal", "drug", "along", "tobacco", "alcohol", "increase", "drug", "abuse", "including", "expanding", "opioid", "epidemic"], ["well", "problem", "legalizing", "marijuana", "make", "three", "legal", "drugs", "...", "n't", "make", "tobacco", "illegal", "alcohol"], ["drugs", "vastly", "deaths", "attributed", "marijuana", "ever"], ["hate", "scare", "tactics"]]
[["VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "NN", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "NFP", "RB", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "RB"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS"]]
establishing third legal drug along tobacco alcohol increase drug abuse including expanding opioid epidemic. well problem legalizing marijuana make three legal drugs ... n't make tobacco illegal alcohol. drugs vastly deaths attributed marijuana ever. hate scare tactics
["scare", "tactic"]
scare tactic
1
1
GMBHanson
"Establishing it as a third legal drug, along with tobacco and alcohol, will increase drug abuse, including the expanding opioid epidemic." Well, if the problem is that legalizing Marijuana will make for three legal drugs...then why don't we make tobacco illegal, or alcohol. Both of those drugs have vastly more deaths attributed to them than marijuana ever has. Hate these scare tactics.
marijuana
A3831-P
marijuana
1
1
16,650
18,337,016
[["establishing", "third", "legal", "drug", "along", "tobacco", "alcohol", "increase", "drug", "abuse", "including", "expanding", "opioid", "epidemic"], ["well", "problem", "legalizing", "marijuana", "make", "three", "legal", "drugs", "...", "n't", "make", "tobacco", "illegal", "alcohol"], ["drugs", "vastly", "deaths", "attributed", "marijuana", "ever"], ["hate", "scare", "tactics"]]
[["VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "NN", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "NFP", "RB", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "RB"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS"]]
establishing third legal drug along tobacco alcohol increase drug abuse including expanding opioid epidemic. well problem legalizing marijuana make three legal drugs ... n't make tobacco illegal alcohol. drugs vastly deaths attributed marijuana ever. hate scare tactics
["marijuana"]
marijuana
1
1
GMBHanson
"Establishing it as a third legal drug, along with tobacco and alcohol, will increase drug abuse, including the expanding opioid epidemic." Well, if the problem is that legalizing Marijuana will make for three legal drugs...then why don't we make tobacco illegal, or alcohol. Both of those drugs have vastly more deaths attributed to them than marijuana ever has. Hate these scare tactics.
marijuana
A3831-P
marijuana
1
3
16,651
18,337,016
[["establishing", "third", "legal", "drug", "along", "tobacco", "alcohol", "increase", "drug", "abuse", "including", "expanding", "opioid", "epidemic"], ["well", "problem", "legalizing", "marijuana", "make", "three", "legal", "drugs", "...", "n't", "make", "tobacco", "illegal", "alcohol"], ["drugs", "vastly", "deaths", "attributed", "marijuana", "ever"], ["hate", "scare", "tactics"]]
[["VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "NN", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "NFP", "RB", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "RB"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS"]]
establishing third legal drug along tobacco alcohol increase drug abuse including expanding opioid epidemic. well problem legalizing marijuana make three legal drugs ... n't make tobacco illegal alcohol. drugs vastly deaths attributed marijuana ever. hate scare tactics
["marijuana"]
marijuana
1
1
GMBHanson
"Establishing it as a third legal drug, along with tobacco and alcohol, will increase drug abuse, including the expanding opioid epidemic." Well, if the problem is that legalizing Marijuana will make for three legal drugs...then why don't we make tobacco illegal, or alcohol. Both of those drugs have vastly more deaths attributed to them than marijuana ever has. Hate these scare tactics.
marijuana
A3831-P
marijuana legalization
1
3
16,652
18,337,016
[["establishing", "third", "legal", "drug", "along", "tobacco", "alcohol", "increase", "drug", "abuse", "including", "expanding", "opioid", "epidemic"], ["well", "problem", "legalizing", "marijuana", "make", "three", "legal", "drugs", "...", "n't", "make", "tobacco", "illegal", "alcohol"], ["drugs", "vastly", "deaths", "attributed", "marijuana", "ever"], ["hate", "scare", "tactics"]]
[["VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VBG", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "NN", "VBG", "NNP", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "NFP", "RB", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNS", "RB", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "RB"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS"]]
establishing third legal drug along tobacco alcohol increase drug abuse including expanding opioid epidemic. well problem legalizing marijuana make three legal drugs ... n't make tobacco illegal alcohol. drugs vastly deaths attributed marijuana ever. hate scare tactics
["marijuana", "legalization"]
marijuana legalization
1
0
millicent
Although this might work if everyone were reasonable, I can imagine people pulling their kids out of school just to get a tax break and buy a computer. The parent then monopolizes the computer all day, ignoring the kid, and the kid ends up learning next to nothing. When the kid gets tested, he's labeled learning disabled and gets remedial services from special educators paid for by everyone else's tax dollars. Lovely.
a tax break
A5162-P
a tax break
0
1
9,199
3,173,635
[["although", "might", "work", "everyone", "reasonable", "imagine", "people", "pulling", "kids", "school", "get", "tax", "break", "buy", "computer"], ["parent", "monopolizes", "computer", "day", "ignoring", "kid", "kid", "ends", "learning", "next", "nothing"], ["kid", "gets", "tested", "'s", "labeled", "learning", "disabled", "gets", "remedial", "services", "special", "educators", "paid", "everyone", "else", "'s", "tax", "dollars"], ["lovely"]]
[["IN", "MD", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VBG", "RB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBG", "JJ", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "POS", "NN", "NNS"], ["JJ"]]
although might work everyone reasonable imagine people pulling kids school get tax break buy computer. parent monopolizes computer day ignoring kid kid ends learning next nothing. kid gets tested 's labeled learning disabled gets remedial services special educators paid everyone else 's tax dollars. lovely
["tax", "break"]
tax break
1
1
millicent
Although this might work if everyone were reasonable, I can imagine people pulling their kids out of school just to get a tax break and buy a computer. The parent then monopolizes the computer all day, ignoring the kid, and the kid ends up learning next to nothing. When the kid gets tested, he's labeled learning disabled and gets remedial services from special educators paid for by everyone else's tax dollars. Lovely.
a tax break
A5162-P
tax break
0
3
9,200
3,173,635
[["although", "might", "work", "everyone", "reasonable", "imagine", "people", "pulling", "kids", "school", "get", "tax", "break", "buy", "computer"], ["parent", "monopolizes", "computer", "day", "ignoring", "kid", "kid", "ends", "learning", "next", "nothing"], ["kid", "gets", "tested", "'s", "labeled", "learning", "disabled", "gets", "remedial", "services", "special", "educators", "paid", "everyone", "else", "'s", "tax", "dollars"], ["lovely"]]
[["IN", "MD", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VBG", "RB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBG", "JJ", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "POS", "NN", "NNS"], ["JJ"]]
although might work everyone reasonable imagine people pulling kids school get tax break buy computer. parent monopolizes computer day ignoring kid kid ends learning next nothing. kid gets tested 's labeled learning disabled gets remedial services special educators paid everyone else 's tax dollars. lovely
["tax", "break"]
tax break
1
1
millicent
Although this might work if everyone were reasonable, I can imagine people pulling their kids out of school just to get a tax break and buy a computer. The parent then monopolizes the computer all day, ignoring the kid, and the kid ends up learning next to nothing. When the kid gets tested, he's labeled learning disabled and gets remedial services from special educators paid for by everyone else's tax dollars. Lovely.
a tax break
A5162-P
tax breaks
0
3
9,201
3,173,635
[["although", "might", "work", "everyone", "reasonable", "imagine", "people", "pulling", "kids", "school", "get", "tax", "break", "buy", "computer"], ["parent", "monopolizes", "computer", "day", "ignoring", "kid", "kid", "ends", "learning", "next", "nothing"], ["kid", "gets", "tested", "'s", "labeled", "learning", "disabled", "gets", "remedial", "services", "special", "educators", "paid", "everyone", "else", "'s", "tax", "dollars"], ["lovely"]]
[["IN", "MD", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VBG", "RB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBG", "JJ", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "POS", "NN", "NNS"], ["JJ"]]
although might work everyone reasonable imagine people pulling kids school get tax break buy computer. parent monopolizes computer day ignoring kid kid ends learning next nothing. kid gets tested 's labeled learning disabled gets remedial services special educators paid everyone else 's tax dollars. lovely
["tax", "break"]
tax break
1
1
millicent
Although this might work if everyone were reasonable, I can imagine people pulling their kids out of school just to get a tax break and buy a computer. The parent then monopolizes the computer all day, ignoring the kid, and the kid ends up learning next to nothing. When the kid gets tested, he's labeled learning disabled and gets remedial services from special educators paid for by everyone else's tax dollars. Lovely.
a tax break
A5162-P
parents' irrational attitude to kids
0
3
9,202
3,173,635
[["although", "might", "work", "everyone", "reasonable", "imagine", "people", "pulling", "kids", "school", "get", "tax", "break", "buy", "computer"], ["parent", "monopolizes", "computer", "day", "ignoring", "kid", "kid", "ends", "learning", "next", "nothing"], ["kid", "gets", "tested", "'s", "labeled", "learning", "disabled", "gets", "remedial", "services", "special", "educators", "paid", "everyone", "else", "'s", "tax", "dollars"], ["lovely"]]
[["IN", "MD", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VBG", "RB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBG", "JJ", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "POS", "NN", "NNS"], ["JJ"]]
although might work everyone reasonable imagine people pulling kids school get tax break buy computer. parent monopolizes computer day ignoring kid kid ends learning next nothing. kid gets tested 's labeled learning disabled gets remedial services special educators paid everyone else 's tax dollars. lovely
["parent", "irrational", "attitude", "kid"]
parent irrational attitude kid
1
0
millicent
Although this might work if everyone were reasonable, I can imagine people pulling their kids out of school just to get a tax break and buy a computer. The parent then monopolizes the computer all day, ignoring the kid, and the kid ends up learning next to nothing. When the kid gets tested, he's labeled learning disabled and gets remedial services from special educators paid for by everyone else's tax dollars. Lovely.
home schoolers
A5161-P
home schoolers
0
1
19,037
3,173,635
[["although", "might", "work", "everyone", "reasonable", "imagine", "people", "pulling", "kids", "school", "get", "tax", "break", "buy", "computer"], ["parent", "monopolizes", "computer", "day", "ignoring", "kid", "kid", "ends", "learning", "next", "nothing"], ["kid", "gets", "tested", "'s", "labeled", "learning", "disabled", "gets", "remedial", "services", "special", "educators", "paid", "everyone", "else", "'s", "tax", "dollars"], ["lovely"]]
[["IN", "MD", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VBG", "RB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBG", "JJ", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "POS", "NN", "NNS"], ["JJ"]]
although might work everyone reasonable imagine people pulling kids school get tax break buy computer. parent monopolizes computer day ignoring kid kid ends learning next nothing. kid gets tested 's labeled learning disabled gets remedial services special educators paid everyone else 's tax dollars. lovely
["home", "schoolers"]
home schoolers
1
0
millicent
Although this might work if everyone were reasonable, I can imagine people pulling their kids out of school just to get a tax break and buy a computer. The parent then monopolizes the computer all day, ignoring the kid, and the kid ends up learning next to nothing. When the kid gets tested, he's labeled learning disabled and gets remedial services from special educators paid for by everyone else's tax dollars. Lovely.
home schoolers
A5161-P
tax break for taking kids out of school
0
3
19,038
3,173,635
[["although", "might", "work", "everyone", "reasonable", "imagine", "people", "pulling", "kids", "school", "get", "tax", "break", "buy", "computer"], ["parent", "monopolizes", "computer", "day", "ignoring", "kid", "kid", "ends", "learning", "next", "nothing"], ["kid", "gets", "tested", "'s", "labeled", "learning", "disabled", "gets", "remedial", "services", "special", "educators", "paid", "everyone", "else", "'s", "tax", "dollars"], ["lovely"]]
[["IN", "MD", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VBG", "RB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBG", "JJ", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "POS", "NN", "NNS"], ["JJ"]]
although might work everyone reasonable imagine people pulling kids school get tax break buy computer. parent monopolizes computer day ignoring kid kid ends learning next nothing. kid gets tested 's labeled learning disabled gets remedial services special educators paid everyone else 's tax dollars. lovely
["tax", "break", "taking", "kid", "school"]
tax break taking kid school
1
0
millicent
Although this might work if everyone were reasonable, I can imagine people pulling their kids out of school just to get a tax break and buy a computer. The parent then monopolizes the computer all day, ignoring the kid, and the kid ends up learning next to nothing. When the kid gets tested, he's labeled learning disabled and gets remedial services from special educators paid for by everyone else's tax dollars. Lovely.
home schoolers
A5161-P
home schooling kids
0
3
19,039
3,173,635
[["although", "might", "work", "everyone", "reasonable", "imagine", "people", "pulling", "kids", "school", "get", "tax", "break", "buy", "computer"], ["parent", "monopolizes", "computer", "day", "ignoring", "kid", "kid", "ends", "learning", "next", "nothing"], ["kid", "gets", "tested", "'s", "labeled", "learning", "disabled", "gets", "remedial", "services", "special", "educators", "paid", "everyone", "else", "'s", "tax", "dollars"], ["lovely"]]
[["IN", "MD", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NNS", "VBG", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "VBG", "RB", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBZ", "VBN", "VBG", "JJ", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "POS", "NN", "NNS"], ["JJ"]]
although might work everyone reasonable imagine people pulling kids school get tax break buy computer. parent monopolizes computer day ignoring kid kid ends learning next nothing. kid gets tested 's labeled learning disabled gets remedial services special educators paid everyone else 's tax dollars. lovely
["home", "schooling", "kid"]
home schooling kid
1
0
Itzajob
Patients consult the internet out of desperation, because they've gotten no help from doctors who spend 5 minutes with them before moving on to the next patient. I've seen it over and over in my own family: A parent with late onset Type 1 diabetes who spent 2 years in the ER with glucose readings well over 400, because doctors would not acknowledge that a thin, active 68-year old might possibly have Type 1 requiring insulin instead of Type 2. A sibling with thyroid disease and a huge goiter whose doctor dismissed it until it finally became toxic. Another with a chronically ruptured appendix who kept being sent home from the ER with ludicrous diagnoses, until it finally became septic, resulting in 2 weeks in the ICU. We diagnosed all these conditions ourselves, before the doctors did. It actually didn't get us any help, because doctors really don't like being challenged. But when your loved one is dying before your eyes and getting no help, what else are you supposed to do?
medical websites
A2684-P
medical websites
1
1
19
19,639,561
[["patients", "consult", "internet", "desperation", "'ve", "gotten", "help", "doctors", "spend", "5", "minutes", "moving", "next", "patient"], ["'ve", "seen", "family", "parent", "late", "onset", "type", "1", "diabetes", "spent", "2", "years", "er", "glucose", "readings", "well", "400", "doctors", "would", "acknowledge", "thin", "active", "68-year", "old", "might", "possibly", "type", "1", "requiring", "insulin", "instead", "type", "2"], ["sibling", "thyroid", "disease", "huge", "goiter", "whose", "doctor", "dismissed", "finally", "became", "toxic"], ["another", "chronically", "ruptured", "appendix", "kept", "sent", "home", "er", "ludicrous", "diagnoses", "finally", "became", "septic", "resulting", "2", "weeks", "icu"], ["diagnosed", "conditions", "doctors"], ["actually", "n't", "get", "us", "help", "doctors", "really", "n't", "like", "challenged"], ["loved", "one", "dying", "eyes", "getting", "help", "else", "supposed"]]
[["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "CD", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "CD", "NNS", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "CD", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "CD", "JJ", "MD", "RB", "NN", "CD", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "NN", "CD"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "WP$", "NN", "VBD", "RB", "VBD", "JJ"], ["DT", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "VBD", "VBN", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBD", "JJ", "VBG", "CD", "NNS", "NNP"], ["VBD", "NNS", "NNS"], ["RB", "RB", "VB", "PRP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBN"], ["VBD", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "VBN"]]
patients consult internet desperation 've gotten help doctors spend 5 minutes moving next patient. 've seen family parent late onset type 1 diabetes spent 2 years er glucose readings well 400 doctors would acknowledge thin active 68-year old might possibly type 1 requiring insulin instead type 2. sibling thyroid disease huge goiter whose doctor dismissed finally became toxic. another chronically ruptured appendix kept sent home er ludicrous diagnoses finally became septic resulting 2 weeks icu. diagnosed conditions doctors. actually n't get us help doctors really n't like challenged. loved one dying eyes getting help else supposed
["medical", "website"]
medical website
1
0
Itzajob
Patients consult the internet out of desperation, because they've gotten no help from doctors who spend 5 minutes with them before moving on to the next patient. I've seen it over and over in my own family: A parent with late onset Type 1 diabetes who spent 2 years in the ER with glucose readings well over 400, because doctors would not acknowledge that a thin, active 68-year old might possibly have Type 1 requiring insulin instead of Type 2. A sibling with thyroid disease and a huge goiter whose doctor dismissed it until it finally became toxic. Another with a chronically ruptured appendix who kept being sent home from the ER with ludicrous diagnoses, until it finally became septic, resulting in 2 weeks in the ICU. We diagnosed all these conditions ourselves, before the doctors did. It actually didn't get us any help, because doctors really don't like being challenged. But when your loved one is dying before your eyes and getting no help, what else are you supposed to do?
medical websites
A2684-P
online consulting
1
3
20
19,639,561
[["patients", "consult", "internet", "desperation", "'ve", "gotten", "help", "doctors", "spend", "5", "minutes", "moving", "next", "patient"], ["'ve", "seen", "family", "parent", "late", "onset", "type", "1", "diabetes", "spent", "2", "years", "er", "glucose", "readings", "well", "400", "doctors", "would", "acknowledge", "thin", "active", "68-year", "old", "might", "possibly", "type", "1", "requiring", "insulin", "instead", "type", "2"], ["sibling", "thyroid", "disease", "huge", "goiter", "whose", "doctor", "dismissed", "finally", "became", "toxic"], ["another", "chronically", "ruptured", "appendix", "kept", "sent", "home", "er", "ludicrous", "diagnoses", "finally", "became", "septic", "resulting", "2", "weeks", "icu"], ["diagnosed", "conditions", "doctors"], ["actually", "n't", "get", "us", "help", "doctors", "really", "n't", "like", "challenged"], ["loved", "one", "dying", "eyes", "getting", "help", "else", "supposed"]]
[["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "CD", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "CD", "NNS", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "CD", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "CD", "JJ", "MD", "RB", "NN", "CD", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "NN", "CD"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "WP$", "NN", "VBD", "RB", "VBD", "JJ"], ["DT", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "VBD", "VBN", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBD", "JJ", "VBG", "CD", "NNS", "NNP"], ["VBD", "NNS", "NNS"], ["RB", "RB", "VB", "PRP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBN"], ["VBD", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "VBN"]]
patients consult internet desperation 've gotten help doctors spend 5 minutes moving next patient. 've seen family parent late onset type 1 diabetes spent 2 years er glucose readings well 400 doctors would acknowledge thin active 68-year old might possibly type 1 requiring insulin instead type 2. sibling thyroid disease huge goiter whose doctor dismissed finally became toxic. another chronically ruptured appendix kept sent home er ludicrous diagnoses finally became septic resulting 2 weeks icu. diagnosed conditions doctors. actually n't get us help doctors really n't like challenged. loved one dying eyes getting help else supposed
["online", "consulting"]
online consulting
1
0
Itzajob
Patients consult the internet out of desperation, because they've gotten no help from doctors who spend 5 minutes with them before moving on to the next patient. I've seen it over and over in my own family: A parent with late onset Type 1 diabetes who spent 2 years in the ER with glucose readings well over 400, because doctors would not acknowledge that a thin, active 68-year old might possibly have Type 1 requiring insulin instead of Type 2. A sibling with thyroid disease and a huge goiter whose doctor dismissed it until it finally became toxic. Another with a chronically ruptured appendix who kept being sent home from the ER with ludicrous diagnoses, until it finally became septic, resulting in 2 weeks in the ICU. We diagnosed all these conditions ourselves, before the doctors did. It actually didn't get us any help, because doctors really don't like being challenged. But when your loved one is dying before your eyes and getting no help, what else are you supposed to do?
medical websites
A2684-P
automedication
1
3
21
19,639,561
[["patients", "consult", "internet", "desperation", "'ve", "gotten", "help", "doctors", "spend", "5", "minutes", "moving", "next", "patient"], ["'ve", "seen", "family", "parent", "late", "onset", "type", "1", "diabetes", "spent", "2", "years", "er", "glucose", "readings", "well", "400", "doctors", "would", "acknowledge", "thin", "active", "68-year", "old", "might", "possibly", "type", "1", "requiring", "insulin", "instead", "type", "2"], ["sibling", "thyroid", "disease", "huge", "goiter", "whose", "doctor", "dismissed", "finally", "became", "toxic"], ["another", "chronically", "ruptured", "appendix", "kept", "sent", "home", "er", "ludicrous", "diagnoses", "finally", "became", "septic", "resulting", "2", "weeks", "icu"], ["diagnosed", "conditions", "doctors"], ["actually", "n't", "get", "us", "help", "doctors", "really", "n't", "like", "challenged"], ["loved", "one", "dying", "eyes", "getting", "help", "else", "supposed"]]
[["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "CD", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "CD", "NNS", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "CD", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "CD", "JJ", "MD", "RB", "NN", "CD", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "NN", "CD"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "WP$", "NN", "VBD", "RB", "VBD", "JJ"], ["DT", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "VBD", "VBN", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBD", "JJ", "VBG", "CD", "NNS", "NNP"], ["VBD", "NNS", "NNS"], ["RB", "RB", "VB", "PRP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBN"], ["VBD", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "VBN"]]
patients consult internet desperation 've gotten help doctors spend 5 minutes moving next patient. 've seen family parent late onset type 1 diabetes spent 2 years er glucose readings well 400 doctors would acknowledge thin active 68-year old might possibly type 1 requiring insulin instead type 2. sibling thyroid disease huge goiter whose doctor dismissed finally became toxic. another chronically ruptured appendix kept sent home er ludicrous diagnoses finally became septic resulting 2 weeks icu. diagnosed conditions doctors. actually n't get us help doctors really n't like challenged. loved one dying eyes getting help else supposed
["automedication"]
automedication
1
0
Itzajob
Patients consult the internet out of desperation, because they've gotten no help from doctors who spend 5 minutes with them before moving on to the next patient. I've seen it over and over in my own family: A parent with late onset Type 1 diabetes who spent 2 years in the ER with glucose readings well over 400, because doctors would not acknowledge that a thin, active 68-year old might possibly have Type 1 requiring insulin instead of Type 2. A sibling with thyroid disease and a huge goiter whose doctor dismissed it until it finally became toxic. Another with a chronically ruptured appendix who kept being sent home from the ER with ludicrous diagnoses, until it finally became septic, resulting in 2 weeks in the ICU. We diagnosed all these conditions ourselves, before the doctors did. It actually didn't get us any help, because doctors really don't like being challenged. But when your loved one is dying before your eyes and getting no help, what else are you supposed to do?
medical websites
A2684-P
medical malpractice
1
3
22
19,639,561
[["patients", "consult", "internet", "desperation", "'ve", "gotten", "help", "doctors", "spend", "5", "minutes", "moving", "next", "patient"], ["'ve", "seen", "family", "parent", "late", "onset", "type", "1", "diabetes", "spent", "2", "years", "er", "glucose", "readings", "well", "400", "doctors", "would", "acknowledge", "thin", "active", "68-year", "old", "might", "possibly", "type", "1", "requiring", "insulin", "instead", "type", "2"], ["sibling", "thyroid", "disease", "huge", "goiter", "whose", "doctor", "dismissed", "finally", "became", "toxic"], ["another", "chronically", "ruptured", "appendix", "kept", "sent", "home", "er", "ludicrous", "diagnoses", "finally", "became", "septic", "resulting", "2", "weeks", "icu"], ["diagnosed", "conditions", "doctors"], ["actually", "n't", "get", "us", "help", "doctors", "really", "n't", "like", "challenged"], ["loved", "one", "dying", "eyes", "getting", "help", "else", "supposed"]]
[["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "CD", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NN"], ["VB", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "CD", "NNS", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "CD", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "CD", "JJ", "MD", "RB", "NN", "CD", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "NN", "CD"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "WP$", "NN", "VBD", "RB", "VBD", "JJ"], ["DT", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "VBD", "VBN", "RB", "NNP", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBD", "JJ", "VBG", "CD", "NNS", "NNP"], ["VBD", "NNS", "NNS"], ["RB", "RB", "VB", "PRP", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBN"], ["VBD", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "VBN"]]
patients consult internet desperation 've gotten help doctors spend 5 minutes moving next patient. 've seen family parent late onset type 1 diabetes spent 2 years er glucose readings well 400 doctors would acknowledge thin active 68-year old might possibly type 1 requiring insulin instead type 2. sibling thyroid disease huge goiter whose doctor dismissed finally became toxic. another chronically ruptured appendix kept sent home er ludicrous diagnoses finally became septic resulting 2 weeks icu. diagnosed conditions doctors. actually n't get us help doctors really n't like challenged. loved one dying eyes getting help else supposed
["medical", "malpractice"]
medical malpractice
1
0
willie sutton
I have been angry for many years that most scientific breakthroughs are the result of Federal funding but the US Gov't and Taxpayers are never patent holders. The system is crooked and rigged in favor of avaricious lawyers and their corporate clients (are there any other kind?).
genes
A897-P
federal funding
0
2
563
9,178,382
[["angry", "many", "years", "scientific", "breakthroughs", "result", "federal", "funding", "us", "gov't", "taxpayers", "never", "patent", "holders"], ["system", "crooked", "rigged", "favor", "avaricious", "lawyers", "corporate", "clients", "kind"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"]]
angry many years scientific breakthroughs result federal funding us gov't taxpayers never patent holders. system crooked rigged favor avaricious lawyers corporate clients kind
["federal", "funding"]
federal funding
1
1
willie sutton
I have been angry for many years that most scientific breakthroughs are the result of Federal funding but the US Gov't and Taxpayers are never patent holders. The system is crooked and rigged in favor of avaricious lawyers and their corporate clients (are there any other kind?).
genes
A897-P
federal funding for patent holders
0
2
564
9,178,382
[["angry", "many", "years", "scientific", "breakthroughs", "result", "federal", "funding", "us", "gov't", "taxpayers", "never", "patent", "holders"], ["system", "crooked", "rigged", "favor", "avaricious", "lawyers", "corporate", "clients", "kind"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"]]
angry many years scientific breakthroughs result federal funding us gov't taxpayers never patent holders. system crooked rigged favor avaricious lawyers corporate clients kind
["federal", "funding", "patent", "holder"]
federal funding patent holder
1
0
willie sutton
I have been angry for many years that most scientific breakthroughs are the result of Federal funding but the US Gov't and Taxpayers are never patent holders. The system is crooked and rigged in favor of avaricious lawyers and their corporate clients (are there any other kind?).
genes
A897-P
government
0
2
565
9,178,382
[["angry", "many", "years", "scientific", "breakthroughs", "result", "federal", "funding", "us", "gov't", "taxpayers", "never", "patent", "holders"], ["system", "crooked", "rigged", "favor", "avaricious", "lawyers", "corporate", "clients", "kind"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"]]
angry many years scientific breakthroughs result federal funding us gov't taxpayers never patent holders. system crooked rigged favor avaricious lawyers corporate clients kind
["government"]
government
1
0
willie sutton
I have been angry for many years that most scientific breakthroughs are the result of Federal funding but the US Gov't and Taxpayers are never patent holders. The system is crooked and rigged in favor of avaricious lawyers and their corporate clients (are there any other kind?).
genes
A897-P
science
0
3
566
9,178,382
[["angry", "many", "years", "scientific", "breakthroughs", "result", "federal", "funding", "us", "gov't", "taxpayers", "never", "patent", "holders"], ["system", "crooked", "rigged", "favor", "avaricious", "lawyers", "corporate", "clients", "kind"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"]]
angry many years scientific breakthroughs result federal funding us gov't taxpayers never patent holders. system crooked rigged favor avaricious lawyers corporate clients kind
["science"]
science
1
0
willie sutton
I have been angry for many years that most scientific breakthroughs are the result of Federal funding but the US Gov't and Taxpayers are never patent holders. The system is crooked and rigged in favor of avaricious lawyers and their corporate clients (are there any other kind?).
genes
A897-P
patent holder
0
3
567
9,178,382
[["angry", "many", "years", "scientific", "breakthroughs", "result", "federal", "funding", "us", "gov't", "taxpayers", "never", "patent", "holders"], ["system", "crooked", "rigged", "favor", "avaricious", "lawyers", "corporate", "clients", "kind"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"]]
angry many years scientific breakthroughs result federal funding us gov't taxpayers never patent holders. system crooked rigged favor avaricious lawyers corporate clients kind
["patent", "holder"]
patent holder
1
1
willie sutton
I have been angry for many years that most scientific breakthroughs are the result of Federal funding but the US Gov't and Taxpayers are never patent holders. The system is crooked and rigged in favor of avaricious lawyers and their corporate clients (are there any other kind?).
genes
A897-P
patent
0
3
568
9,178,382
[["angry", "many", "years", "scientific", "breakthroughs", "result", "federal", "funding", "us", "gov't", "taxpayers", "never", "patent", "holders"], ["system", "crooked", "rigged", "favor", "avaricious", "lawyers", "corporate", "clients", "kind"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"]]
angry many years scientific breakthroughs result federal funding us gov't taxpayers never patent holders. system crooked rigged favor avaricious lawyers corporate clients kind
["patent"]
patent
1
1
willie sutton
I have been angry for many years that most scientific breakthroughs are the result of Federal funding but the US Gov't and Taxpayers are never patent holders. The system is crooked and rigged in favor of avaricious lawyers and their corporate clients (are there any other kind?).
companies
A896-P
companies
0
1
1,728
9,178,382
[["angry", "many", "years", "scientific", "breakthroughs", "result", "federal", "funding", "us", "gov't", "taxpayers", "never", "patent", "holders"], ["system", "crooked", "rigged", "favor", "avaricious", "lawyers", "corporate", "clients", "kind"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"]]
angry many years scientific breakthroughs result federal funding us gov't taxpayers never patent holders. system crooked rigged favor avaricious lawyers corporate clients kind
["company"]
company
1
0
willie sutton
I have been angry for many years that most scientific breakthroughs are the result of Federal funding but the US Gov't and Taxpayers are never patent holders. The system is crooked and rigged in favor of avaricious lawyers and their corporate clients (are there any other kind?).
companies
A896-P
science achievements
0
3
1,729
9,178,382
[["angry", "many", "years", "scientific", "breakthroughs", "result", "federal", "funding", "us", "gov't", "taxpayers", "never", "patent", "holders"], ["system", "crooked", "rigged", "favor", "avaricious", "lawyers", "corporate", "clients", "kind"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"]]
angry many years scientific breakthroughs result federal funding us gov't taxpayers never patent holders. system crooked rigged favor avaricious lawyers corporate clients kind
["science", "achievement"]
science achievement
1
0
willie sutton
I have been angry for many years that most scientific breakthroughs are the result of Federal funding but the US Gov't and Taxpayers are never patent holders. The system is crooked and rigged in favor of avaricious lawyers and their corporate clients (are there any other kind?).
companies
A896-P
medical patents
0
3
1,730
9,178,382
[["angry", "many", "years", "scientific", "breakthroughs", "result", "federal", "funding", "us", "gov't", "taxpayers", "never", "patent", "holders"], ["system", "crooked", "rigged", "favor", "avaricious", "lawyers", "corporate", "clients", "kind"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"]]
angry many years scientific breakthroughs result federal funding us gov't taxpayers never patent holders. system crooked rigged favor avaricious lawyers corporate clients kind
["medical", "patent"]
medical patent
1
0
Matt
The comments here are so odd ... not many fans of the game here. Dunks are difficult to achieve, especially with the defenses that are now common in the NBA. What LeBron does isn't 'easy' by any means. The standards of the game have risen since the 'good old days', and the dunk is one weapon (and not the primary weapon) in the overall arsenal of the NBA offense. Much of the lamenting here strikes me as bitter old people yearning for the past. The NBA is better today than it was 40 years ago.
rim
A4712-P
dunk
1
2
19,147
9,047,310
[["comments", "odd", "...", "many", "fans", "game"], ["dunks", "difficult", "achieve", "especially", "defenses", "common", "nba"], ["lebron", "n't", "easy", "means"], ["standards", "game", "risen", "since", "good", "old", "days", "dunk", "one", "weapon", "primary", "weapon", "overall", "arsenal", "nba", "offense"], ["much", "lamenting", "strikes", "bitter", "old", "people", "yearning", "past"], ["nba", "better", "today", "40", "years", "ago"]]
[["NNS", "JJ", ":", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NNP"], ["NNP", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NNS", "NN", "VBN", "IN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "CD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJR", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "RB"]]
comments odd ... many fans game. dunks difficult achieve especially defenses common nba. lebron n't easy means. standards game risen since good old days dunk one weapon primary weapon overall arsenal nba offense. much lamenting strikes bitter old people yearning past. nba better today 40 years ago
["dunk"]
dunk
1
1
Matt
The comments here are so odd ... not many fans of the game here. Dunks are difficult to achieve, especially with the defenses that are now common in the NBA. What LeBron does isn't 'easy' by any means. The standards of the game have risen since the 'good old days', and the dunk is one weapon (and not the primary weapon) in the overall arsenal of the NBA offense. Much of the lamenting here strikes me as bitter old people yearning for the past. The NBA is better today than it was 40 years ago.
rim
A4712-P
nba
1
2
19,148
9,047,310
[["comments", "odd", "...", "many", "fans", "game"], ["dunks", "difficult", "achieve", "especially", "defenses", "common", "nba"], ["lebron", "n't", "easy", "means"], ["standards", "game", "risen", "since", "good", "old", "days", "dunk", "one", "weapon", "primary", "weapon", "overall", "arsenal", "nba", "offense"], ["much", "lamenting", "strikes", "bitter", "old", "people", "yearning", "past"], ["nba", "better", "today", "40", "years", "ago"]]
[["NNS", "JJ", ":", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NNP"], ["NNP", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NNS", "NN", "VBN", "IN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "CD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJR", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "RB"]]
comments odd ... many fans game. dunks difficult achieve especially defenses common nba. lebron n't easy means. standards game risen since good old days dunk one weapon primary weapon overall arsenal nba offense. much lamenting strikes bitter old people yearning past. nba better today 40 years ago
["nba"]
nba
1
1
Matt
The comments here are so odd ... not many fans of the game here. Dunks are difficult to achieve, especially with the defenses that are now common in the NBA. What LeBron does isn't 'easy' by any means. The standards of the game have risen since the 'good old days', and the dunk is one weapon (and not the primary weapon) in the overall arsenal of the NBA offense. Much of the lamenting here strikes me as bitter old people yearning for the past. The NBA is better today than it was 40 years ago.
rim
A4712-P
the nba
1
3
19,149
9,047,310
[["comments", "odd", "...", "many", "fans", "game"], ["dunks", "difficult", "achieve", "especially", "defenses", "common", "nba"], ["lebron", "n't", "easy", "means"], ["standards", "game", "risen", "since", "good", "old", "days", "dunk", "one", "weapon", "primary", "weapon", "overall", "arsenal", "nba", "offense"], ["much", "lamenting", "strikes", "bitter", "old", "people", "yearning", "past"], ["nba", "better", "today", "40", "years", "ago"]]
[["NNS", "JJ", ":", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NNP"], ["NNP", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NNS", "NN", "VBN", "IN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "CD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJR", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "RB"]]
comments odd ... many fans game. dunks difficult achieve especially defenses common nba. lebron n't easy means. standards game risen since good old days dunk one weapon primary weapon overall arsenal nba offense. much lamenting strikes bitter old people yearning past. nba better today 40 years ago
["nba"]
nba
1
1
Matt
The comments here are so odd ... not many fans of the game here. Dunks are difficult to achieve, especially with the defenses that are now common in the NBA. What LeBron does isn't 'easy' by any means. The standards of the game have risen since the 'good old days', and the dunk is one weapon (and not the primary weapon) in the overall arsenal of the NBA offense. Much of the lamenting here strikes me as bitter old people yearning for the past. The NBA is better today than it was 40 years ago.
rim
A4712-P
lebron
1
3
19,150
9,047,310
[["comments", "odd", "...", "many", "fans", "game"], ["dunks", "difficult", "achieve", "especially", "defenses", "common", "nba"], ["lebron", "n't", "easy", "means"], ["standards", "game", "risen", "since", "good", "old", "days", "dunk", "one", "weapon", "primary", "weapon", "overall", "arsenal", "nba", "offense"], ["much", "lamenting", "strikes", "bitter", "old", "people", "yearning", "past"], ["nba", "better", "today", "40", "years", "ago"]]
[["NNS", "JJ", ":", "JJ", "NNS", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NNP"], ["NNP", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NNS", "NN", "VBN", "IN", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "CD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNP", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NNP", "JJR", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "RB"]]
comments odd ... many fans game. dunks difficult achieve especially defenses common nba. lebron n't easy means. standards game risen since good old days dunk one weapon primary weapon overall arsenal nba offense. much lamenting strikes bitter old people yearning past. nba better today 40 years ago
["lebron"]
lebron
1
1
KP
"...wait some period of time to ensure that the felon has actually turned over a new leaf." The release from prison after having met all the criteria for the sentence affirms their debt to society has been met, but you want to impose more? Pray tell, how does one satisfy the "new leaf" criteria? How long does it take? All Mr. Clegg's position does is try to justify a limitation on earned freedom. Our Founding Fathers would find that unconscionable.
felons
A4974-P
felons
1
1
14,116
18,320,657
[["...", "wait", "period", "time", "ensure", "felon", "actually", "turned", "new", "leaf"], ["release", "prison", "met", "criteria", "sentence", "affirms", "debt", "society", "met", "want", "impose"], ["pray", "tell", "one", "satisfy", "new", "leaf", "criteria"], ["long", "take"], ["mr.", "clegg", "'s", "position", "try", "justify", "limitation", "earned", "freedom"], ["founding", "fathers", "would", "find", "unconscionable"]]
[[":", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "VBP", "VB"], ["UH", "VB", "CD", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB"], ["NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NN", "VB", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "JJ"]]
... wait period time ensure felon actually turned new leaf. release prison met criteria sentence affirms debt society met want impose. pray tell one satisfy new leaf criteria. long take. mr. clegg 's position try justify limitation earned freedom. founding fathers would find unconscionable
["felon"]
felon
1
1