| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| """Figure generation for the EduMirror reproduction logbook. |
| |
| Design note on presentation honesty: every figure that compares our numbers to |
| the paper's plots BOTH, and never rescales ours onto the paper's axis. Where we |
| ran at reduced scale, the caption says so. The point of these figures is to let a |
| reader see the ordering and the gap, not to make the reproduction look tidy. |
| """ |
|
|
| from __future__ import annotations |
|
|
| import argparse |
| import json |
| from pathlib import Path |
|
|
| import matplotlib |
|
|
| matplotlib.use("Agg") |
| import matplotlib.pyplot as plt |
| import numpy as np |
|
|
| METHODS = ["EduMirror", "LLMob", "BabyAGI", "D2A", "ReAct"] |
|
|
| |
| |
| PAPER_TABLE1 = { |
| "5": {"EduMirror": 4.80, "LLMob": 4.25, "BabyAGI": 4.10, "D2A": 3.35, "ReAct": 2.35}, |
| "15": {"EduMirror": 4.18, "LLMob": 3.60, "BabyAGI": 3.57, "D2A": 3.53, "ReAct": 2.93}, |
| "30": {"EduMirror": 4.03, "LLMob": 3.83, "BabyAGI": 3.86, "D2A": 3.12, "ReAct": 2.41}, |
| } |
|
|
| |
| COLORS = { |
| "EduMirror": "#4C72B0", |
| "LLMob": "#DD8452", |
| "BabyAGI": "#55A868", |
| "D2A": "#C44E52", |
| "ReAct": "#8172B3", |
| } |
|
|
|
|
| def _spearman(x: list[float], y: list[float]) -> float: |
| """ |
| Spearman rank correlation between two equal-length sequences. |
| |
| Args: |
| x: First series. |
| y: Second series. |
| |
| Returns: |
| Rank correlation in [-1, 1], or NaN if either series is constant. |
| |
| Why: |
| Claim 2's substance is an ORDERING ("EduMirror scores highest"), not the |
| absolute values -- which cannot transfer across a different backbone |
| model anyway. Rank correlation against the paper's ordering is therefore |
| the right statistic. We implement it directly to avoid a scipy dependency |
| for one function. |
| """ |
| n = len(x) |
| if n < 2: |
| return float("nan") |
|
|
| def rank(vals: list[float]) -> list[float]: |
| order = sorted(range(n), key=lambda i: vals[i]) |
| ranks = [0.0] * n |
| i = 0 |
| while i < n: |
| j = i |
| while j + 1 < n and vals[order[j + 1]] == vals[order[i]]: |
| j += 1 |
| avg = (i + j) / 2 + 1 |
| for k in range(i, j + 1): |
| ranks[order[k]] = avg |
| i = j + 1 |
| return ranks |
|
|
| rx, ry = rank(x), rank(y) |
| mx, my = sum(rx) / n, sum(ry) / n |
| num = sum((a - mx) * (b - my) for a, b in zip(rx, ry)) |
| den = (sum((a - mx) ** 2 for a in rx) * sum((b - my) ** 2 for b in ry)) ** 0.5 |
| return num / den if den else float("nan") |
|
|
|
|
| def fig_claim2(results: dict, out: Path) -> dict: |
| """ |
| Grouped bar chart: our scores vs the paper's Table 1, per group size. |
| |
| Args: |
| results: Parsed claim2.json. |
| out: Output directory. |
| |
| Returns: |
| A summary dict with per-size rank correlations and orderings. |
| |
| Why side-by-side rather than overlaid: |
| Our absolute scores come from a different judge model than GPT-4o, so the |
| levels are not comparable and overlaying them would invite a false |
| reading. What IS comparable is the ordering of methods within each panel, |
| which is what the claim asserts. |
| """ |
| table = results["table"] |
| sizes = [s for s in ("5", "15", "30") if s in table] |
| fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, len(sizes), figsize=(5 * len(sizes), 4.2), sharey=True) |
| if len(sizes) == 1: |
| axes = [axes] |
|
|
| summary = {} |
| for ax, size in zip(axes, sizes): |
| ours = [table[size].get(m) for m in METHODS] |
| theirs = [PAPER_TABLE1[size][m] for m in METHODS] |
| x = np.arange(len(METHODS)) |
| w = 0.38 |
| ax.bar(x - w / 2, [o if o is not None else 0 for o in ours], w, |
| label="This reproduction", color=[COLORS[m] for m in METHODS]) |
| ax.bar(x + w / 2, theirs, w, label="Paper (Table 1)", |
| color=[COLORS[m] for m in METHODS], alpha=0.42, hatch="//") |
| ax.set_xticks(x) |
| ax.set_xticklabels(METHODS, rotation=30, ha="right") |
| ax.set_title(f"{size} agents") |
| ax.set_ylim(1, 5) |
| ax.grid(axis="y", alpha=0.3) |
|
|
| valid = [(o, t, m) for o, t, m in zip(ours, theirs, METHODS) if o is not None] |
| if len(valid) >= 3: |
| rho = _spearman([v[0] for v in valid], [v[1] for v in valid]) |
| else: |
| rho = float("nan") |
| ranked = [m for _, m in sorted( |
| ((o, m) for o, _, m in valid), key=lambda p: -p[0])] |
| summary[size] = { |
| "ours": {m: table[size].get(m) for m in METHODS}, |
| "paper": PAPER_TABLE1[size], |
| "spearman_rho": None if rho != rho else round(rho, 3), |
| "our_ranking": ranked, |
| "paper_ranking": [m for m in sorted(METHODS, key=lambda m: -PAPER_TABLE1[size][m])], |
| "edumirror_is_top_ours": bool(ranked and ranked[0] == "EduMirror"), |
| } |
|
|
| axes[0].set_ylabel("Average score (1-5)") |
| handles = [ |
| plt.Rectangle((0, 0), 1, 1, color="#666"), |
| plt.Rectangle((0, 0), 1, 1, color="#666", alpha=0.42, hatch="//"), |
| ] |
| axes[-1].legend(handles, ["This reproduction", "Paper (Table 1)"], loc="upper right", fontsize=8) |
| fig.suptitle( |
| "Claim 2: kindergarten scalability -- average of Naturalness, Coherence,\n" |
| "Plausibility, Developmental Typicality (higher is better)", |
| fontsize=11, |
| ) |
| fig.tight_layout() |
| out.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) |
| fig.savefig(out / "claim2_scalability.png", dpi=150) |
| plt.close(fig) |
| return summary |
|
|
|
|
| def fig_claim4(results: dict, out: Path) -> dict: |
| """ |
| Win-rate heatmap: cell = win rate of the COLUMN method vs the ROW method. |
| |
| Args: |
| results: Parsed claim4.json. |
| out: Output directory. |
| |
| Returns: |
| A summary dict of average win rates. |
| |
| Why this orientation: |
| Figure 4's caption: "Each cell indicates the win rate of the column model |
| relative to the row model". Matching the paper's orientation matters -- |
| transposing it would silently invert every reading. |
| """ |
| matrix = results["matrix"] |
| data = np.array([[matrix[r].get(c, float("nan")) for c in METHODS] for r in METHODS], |
| dtype=float) |
| fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(6.4, 5.4)) |
| im = ax.imshow(data, cmap="RdYlBu_r", vmin=0, vmax=1) |
| ax.set_xticks(range(len(METHODS))) |
| ax.set_xticklabels(METHODS, rotation=30, ha="right") |
| ax.set_yticks(range(len(METHODS))) |
| ax.set_yticklabels(METHODS) |
| ax.set_xlabel("Column model") |
| ax.set_ylabel("Row model") |
| for i in range(len(METHODS)): |
| for j in range(len(METHODS)): |
| v = data[i, j] |
| if v == v: |
| ax.text(j, i, f"{v:.2f}", ha="center", va="center", |
| color="white" if (v < 0.28 or v > 0.72) else "black", fontsize=9) |
| else: |
| ax.text(j, i, "--", ha="center", va="center", color="#999") |
| fig.colorbar(im, ax=ax, label="Win rate of column vs row") |
| ax.set_title(f"Claim 4: pairwise win rates across {results.get('n_scenarios', '?')} scenarios") |
| fig.tight_layout() |
| out.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) |
| fig.savefig(out / "claim4_heatmap.png", dpi=150) |
| plt.close(fig) |
| return {"average_win_rate": results.get("average_win_rate")} |
|
|
|
|
| def fig_claim5(results: dict, out: Path) -> dict: |
| """ |
| Boxplot of malicious competition per intervention arm (paper Figure 7 shape). |
| |
| Args: |
| results: Parsed claim5.json. |
| out: Output directory. |
| |
| Returns: |
| The per-arm summary dict. |
| |
| Why boxes + mean lines: |
| Figure 7's caption: "Boxes show IQRs, whiskers show min-max, and red |
| dashed lines indicate means". The claim is about SPREAD (interventions |
| produce "lower variance and narrower ranges"; the control shows "the |
| widest fluctuation"), so a bar chart of means would omit the very |
| quantity being claimed. |
| """ |
| records = results["records"] |
| arms = ["neglectful", "team_competition", "teacher_reminder", "pre_education"] |
| labels = { |
| "neglectful": "Control\n(Neglectful)", |
| "team_competition": "Team\nCompetition", |
| "teacher_reminder": "Teacher\nReminder", |
| "pre_education": "Pre-\nEducation", |
| } |
| data, present = [], [] |
| for arm in arms: |
| vals = [r["malicious_competition"] for r in records |
| if r["arm"] == arm and r.get("valid")] |
| if vals: |
| data.append(vals) |
| present.append(arm) |
| if not data: |
| return {} |
|
|
| fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(7.2, 4.6)) |
| bp = ax.boxplot(data, tick_labels=[labels[a] for a in present], whis=(0, 100), |
| showmeans=True, meanline=True, |
| meanprops={"color": "red", "linestyle": "--", "linewidth": 1.6}, |
| medianprops={"color": "#333"}) |
| for patch, arm in zip(bp["boxes"], present): |
| patch.set_color("#C44E52" if arm == "neglectful" else "#4C72B0") |
| ax.set_ylabel("Malicious competition behaviours per episode") |
| ax.set_title("Claim 5: intervention strategies vs. extreme competition\n" |
| "(class monitor election; whiskers = min-max, red dashed = mean)") |
| ax.grid(axis="y", alpha=0.3) |
| fig.tight_layout() |
| out.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) |
| fig.savefig(out / "claim5_interventions.png", dpi=150) |
| plt.close(fig) |
| return results.get("summary", {}) |
|
|
|
|
| def fig_claim3(results: dict, out: Path) -> dict: |
| """ |
| Scatter of internal need change vs. external RSES change (construct validity). |
| |
| Args: |
| results: Parsed claim3.json. |
| out: Output directory. |
| |
| Returns: |
| A summary with the correlation and n. |
| |
| Why a scatter and not a bar: |
| The Claim 3 evidence is an association between two independently-measured |
| quantities (delta-Value from the internal Value System, delta-RSES from |
| the Surveyor's standard instrument). A scatter shows the association AND |
| its scatter/outliers; a summary bar would hide whether a single point |
| drives the correlation. |
| """ |
| records = [r for r in results["records"] if r.get("delta_rses") is not None] |
| if len(records) < 2: |
| return {"correlation": None, "n": len(records)} |
| xs = [r["delta_value"] for r in records] |
| ys = [r["delta_rses"] for r in records] |
| arms = sorted({r["arm"] for r in records}) |
| arm_colors = dict(zip(arms, ["#C44E52", "#DD8452", "#55A868", "#4C72B0"])) |
|
|
| fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(6.4, 4.8)) |
| for arm in arms: |
| pts = [(r["delta_value"], r["delta_rses"]) for r in records if r["arm"] == arm] |
| ax.scatter([p[0] for p in pts], [p[1] for p in pts], s=60, alpha=0.8, |
| label=arm.replace("_", " "), color=arm_colors.get(arm)) |
| if len(set(xs)) > 1: |
| coef = np.polyfit(xs, ys, 1) |
| xr = np.linspace(min(xs), max(xs), 50) |
| ax.plot(xr, np.polyval(coef, xr), "--", color="#333", alpha=0.7, linewidth=1.2) |
| ax.axhline(0, color="#bbb", linewidth=0.8) |
| ax.axvline(0, color="#bbb", linewidth=0.8) |
| ax.set_xlabel("Δ internal value (mean of 'self worth', 'sense of respect')") |
| ax.set_ylabel("Δ RSES total (external instrument, 10-40)") |
| ax.set_title("Claim 3: construct validity of the Individual Value System\n" |
| "internal state vs. LLM Surveyor's Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale") |
| ax.legend(fontsize=8) |
| ax.grid(alpha=0.3) |
| fig.tight_layout() |
| out.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) |
| fig.savefig(out / "claim3_rses_validity.png", dpi=150) |
| plt.close(fig) |
| return { |
| "pearson": results.get("delta_value_vs_delta_rses_correlation"), |
| "spearman": round(_spearman(xs, ys), 3) if len(set(xs)) > 1 else None, |
| "n": len(records), |
| } |
|
|
|
|
| def main() -> None: |
| """Generate every figure whose source JSON is present.""" |
| p = argparse.ArgumentParser() |
| p.add_argument("--results", type=Path, required=True) |
| p.add_argument("--out", type=Path, default=Path("figures")) |
| args = p.parse_args() |
|
|
| summary = {} |
| for name, fn in (("claim2", fig_claim2), ("claim3", fig_claim3), |
| ("claim4", fig_claim4), ("claim5", fig_claim5)): |
| path = args.results / f"{name}.json" |
| if not path.exists(): |
| print(f"skip {name}: {path} not found") |
| continue |
| summary[name] = fn(json.loads(path.read_text()), args.out) |
| print(f"{name}: {json.dumps(summary[name], indent=2, default=str)}") |
|
|
| args.out.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) |
| (args.out / "summary.json").write_text(json.dumps(summary, indent=2, default=str)) |
| print(f"\nwrote figures + summary.json to {args.out}") |
|
|
|
|
| if __name__ == "__main__": |
| main() |
|
|