Datasets:

yonathanarbel
/

my-works-for-llm

text stringlengths 0 181
# Yonathan Arbel – Corpus
# 约纳坦·阿贝尔 – 语料库

## Papers
- [ssrn-2820650](papers/ssrn-2820650/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-2820650 中文](papers/ssrn-2820650/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-2835482](papers/ssrn-2835482/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-2835482 中文](papers/ssrn-2835482/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-1641438](papers/ssrn-1641438/summary.md): article by Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-3015569](papers/ssrn-3015569/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-3015569 中文](papers/ssrn-3015569/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-3239995](papers/ssrn-3239995/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-3239995 中文](papers/ssrn-3239995/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-3272595](papers/ssrn-3272595/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-3272595 中文](papers/ssrn-3272595/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-3311527](papers/ssrn-3311527/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-3311527 中文](papers/ssrn-3311527/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-3452662](papers/ssrn-3452662/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-3452662 中文](papers/ssrn-3452662/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-3501175](papers/ssrn-3501175/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-3501175 中文](papers/ssrn-3501175/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-3519630](papers/ssrn-3519630/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-3519630 中文](papers/ssrn-3519630/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-3568768](papers/ssrn-3568768/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-3568768 中文](papers/ssrn-3568768/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-3681083](papers/ssrn-3681083/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-3681083 中文](papers/ssrn-3681083/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-3740356](papers/ssrn-3740356/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-3740356 中文](papers/ssrn-3740356/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-4491043](papers/ssrn-4491043/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-4491043 中文](papers/ssrn-4491043/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-4526219](papers/ssrn-4526219/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-4526219 中文](papers/ssrn-4526219/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-4631897](papers/ssrn-4631897/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-4631897 中文](papers/ssrn-4631897/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-4666854](papers/ssrn-4666854/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-4666854 中文](papers/ssrn-4666854/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-4809006](papers/ssrn-4809006/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-4809006 中文](papers/ssrn-4809006/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-4873649](papers/ssrn-4873649/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-4873649 中文](papers/ssrn-4873649/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-4962098](papers/ssrn-4962098/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-4962098 中文](papers/ssrn-4962098/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
- [ssrn-5181207](papers/ssrn-5181207/summary.md): Professor Yonathan Arbel of the University of Alabama School of Law.
- [ssrn-5181207 中文](papers/ssrn-5181207/summary.zh.md)：约纳坦·阿贝尔，美国阿拉巴马大学法学院教授。
CONTRACT REMEDIES IN ACTION: SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
Yonathan A. Arbel*
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................. 370
I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 370
II. CONTRACT REMEDIES IN THEORY: NORMATIVE AND EMPIRICAL
ASSUMPTIONS ....................................................................................... 375
A. Rights-Based Theories ................................................................... 375
1. Common Structure ................................................................... 375
2. Common Assumptions ............................................................. 377
B. Economic Theories ........................................................................ 379
1. Common Structure ................................................................... 379
2. Common Assumptions ............................................................. 380
III. THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................................... 381
IV. METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 384
V. FINDINGS ON SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE PRE-JUDGMENT....................... 386
A. Why Do Parties Not Sue More Frequently for Specific
Performance?................................................................................. 387
1. Low Enforceability .................................................................. 388
2. The Lawyers’ Agency Problem ............................................... 388
3. Preferences over Time ............................................................. 389
B. Why Do Parties Sue for Specific Performance? ............................ 390
1. Signaling .................................................................................. 391
2. Achieving Faster, Cheaper Case Resolution ............................ 391
3. Post-Judgment Renegotiation .................................................. 392
VI. POST-JUDGMENT RENEGOTIATION AND ITS FAILURES ......................... 392
VII. IMPLEMENTING SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE: PITFALLS AND
OBSTACLES ........................................................................................... 396
A. Animosity ....................................................................................... 398
B. Costly Supervision and Lack of Standards .................................... 399
C. Post-Judgment Costs and Liquidity ............................................... 400
* Terence M. Considine Fellow at the Center for Law, Economics and Business, and Private
Law Fellow, Harvard Law School. The Author would like to thank Hadar Aviram, Janet Freilch,
Lawrence Friedman, A. Mitchell Polinsky, Louis Kaplow, Kobi Kastiel, Amalia Kessler, Steven
Shavell, and Roy Shapira for helpful comments. The Author is also grateful for the suggestions
of the participants of the Empirical Legal Studies and Law and Society conferences, and for the
dedicated work of Jim McDaniel and the rest of the board of the West Virginia Law Review.
Financial and research support was provided by the John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics,
and Business.
369
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1641438
370 WEST VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 118
D. Capitalization and the Judgment-Proof Problem .......................... 401
E. Defendant’s Reputation ................................................................. 401
F. Social Norms and Social Pressures ............................................... 402
VII. IMPLICATIONS FOR LAW AND THEORY ................................................. 403
A. Rights-Based Theories of Contract ................................................ 403
B. Economic Theories ........................................................................ 406
C. Legal Implications ......................................................................... 408
X. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................... 410
ABSTRACT
How is a right to specific performance of a contract used by parties?
Despite longstanding scholarly interest in the topic, this question has been
largely left unexplored. This Article presents a qualitative study of parties and
attorneys involved in specific performance litigation. It investigates how parties
choose between remedies, whether they negotiate after judgment for specific

End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

my-works-for-llm

Machine-readable corpus of Professor Yonathan Arbel's scholarship for LLM research.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18781458

Link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781458

What’s inside

Each record contains:

paper_id (e.g., ssrn-5377475)
content_type (summary, one_pager, study_pack, or paper)
language (en, zh, or und)
source_path (path in the GitHub repo)
metadata (JSON metadata)
text (the actual content)

How to build the dataset files

From the GitHub repo:

python export_llm_dataset.py --out-jsonl dist/arbel-corpus.jsonl

License

See the repository license and per-paper metadata (papers are dedicated under CC0-1.0).

Citation

See CITATION.cff in the GitHub repo, or cite the Zenodo record directly:

@misc{https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781458,
  doi = {10.5281/ZENODO.18781458},
  url = {https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.18781458},
  author = {Arbel, Yonathan A.},
  keywords = {contracts, artificial intelligence, legal scholarship, empirical legal studies, consumer protection},
  title = {my-works-for-llm: Machine-readable corpus of Yonathan Arbel's scholarship},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year = {2026},
  copyright = {Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal}
}

Downloads last month: 39