SuperFoil / README.md
yunplus's picture
Update README.md
bd99f10
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
10.9 kB
metadata
configs:
  - config_name: default
    data_files:
      - split: VT_shape
        path: VT/all_shapes_meta.parquet
license: cc-by-sa-4.0
tags:
  - AI4CFD
  - RANS
  - Airfoils

SuperFoil is a collection of supercritical airfoil datasets. It contains 1420 distinct airfoils, with around 20k of their flow field under multiple operating conditions, designed for different purposes. The key feature of SuperFoil is that an Output Space Sampling (OSS) strategy is used, which makes the airfoils in the dataset have great diversity in both geometric and flow features.

{D84402E3-BE2D-4C88-85DD-0092AD5F6E55}

Overview

SuperFoil uses the Class Shape Transformation methods to describe airfoils. It contains two groups of shapes, where the FT set has lower variation in shapes, and VT set has a much larger variation. The VT shape set has 1420 shapes (which means 1420 groups of CST coefficients), and we use these shapes to generate several flow field datasets by simulating the flow around these airfoils under multiple operating conditions. Specifically, for each dataset, a varying operating condition is selected. Its value is perturbed around the airfoil's reference operating condition for each airfoil.

A summary of these datasets is provided below:

Folder Dataset Varying Var. (t/c)max(t/c)_{\max} MaMa_{\infty} CLC_L AoAAoA(deg.) NAirfoilsN_{\mathrm{Airfoils}} NflowfiledsN_{\mathrm{flowfileds}} Comment
FT A-1 CLC_L 0.095 0.76 ls(0.6, 1.0, 0.04) / 1498 16478 FIX MAX. THICKNESS
VT/BUF A-3-1 (n3; 5) AoAAoA ls(0.09, 0.13, 0.01) ls(0.71, 0.76, 0.01) / [-3.0-5.0] 1217 25607 for buffet onset prediction
VT/DD A-3-2 (ma-n4; 7) MaMa ls(0.09, 0.13, 0.01) [0.65-0.80] ls(0.6, 0.9, 0.01) / 1266 17386 for drag divergence prediction
VT/GU A-3-3 (n5-1; 10) CLC_L U[0.085-0.135] U[0.705-0.765] [0.0-1.0] / 1341 16031

The dataset was established by Runze Li and Yunjia Yang @ AeroLab, Tsinghua University. Please cite the corresponding paper for the datasets:

FT: Yang, Yunjia, Runze Li, Yufei Zhang, and Haixin Chen*. 2022. “Flowfield Prediction of Airfoil Off-Design Conditions Based on a Modified Variational Autoencoder.” AIAA Journal 60 (10): 5805–20. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J061972.

VT/BUF: Yang, Yunjia, Runze Li, Yufei Zhang, and Haixin Chen*. 2024. “Fast Buffet-Onset Prediction and Optimization Method Based on Pretrained Flowfield Prediction Model.” AIAA Journal 62 (8): 2979–95. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J063634.

VT/DD: Yang, Yunjia, Runze Li, Yufei Zhang, and Haixin Chen*. 2026. "Uncertainty-aware data-based method for fast and reliable shape optimization." Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 69 (4): 95. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00158-026-04259-0

VT/GU: Yang, Yunjia, Runze Li, Yufei Zhang, Lu Lu, and Haixin Chen*. 2025. "Rapid aerodynamic prediction of swept wings via physics-embedded transfer learning." AIAA Journal 63 (6): 2545-59.

Sampling of the shape coefficients

Basics of CST

The upper and lower surfaces are represented independently using CST functions. The surface is described with

yu,b(x)=C(x)i=09uiΦi(x),yl,b(x)=C(x)i=09liΦi(x), y_\text{u,b}(x) = C(x) \cdot \sum_{i=0}^{9} u_i \cdot \Phi_i(x),\quad y_\text{l,b}(x) = C(x) \cdot \sum_{i=0}^{9} l_i \cdot \Phi_i(x), where C(x)=x0.5(1x)1.0C(x) = x^{0.5}(1-x)^{1.0} is the class function, and where ϕi(x)=(ni)xi(1x)ni\phi_i(x)=\binom{n}{i}x^i(1-x)^{n-i} denotes the ii-th Bernstein basis polynomial of degree nn.

Output Space Sampling (OSS)

Please refer to this paper for the detailed methodology. Runze, LI, Yufei Zhang, and Haixin Chen*. 2022. "Pressure distribution feature-oriented sampling for statistical analysis of supercritical airfoil aerodynamics". Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 35 (4): 14.

The OSS method aims to obtain geometric parameters with more abundant and diverse flow features (here, the pressure distribution features are mainly considered, e.g., the position and the intensity of the shock wave. The sampling process can be simply recognized as a series of optimizations, where the objectives are the diversity of flow features under several reference operation conditions. It follows the steps below:

  1. Decide the reference operating conditions. Here we use MaMa_{\infty} and CLC_L. The values for VT can be found in VT\all_shapes_meta.parquet under Ref_minf and Ref_cl.
  2. Get an initial population. Here, we use the linear combination of several common supercritical airfoils (OAT15A, RAE2822, RS16SC1, VA2, etc.).
  3. Conduct optimization under the reference operating conditions. The objectives are the diversity of shock wave position and strength, and constraints are leading-edge radius is larger than 0.007 and the cruise point drag coefficient does not exceed 0.1

Simulation

Meshing

  • Structured C-type grid solved with the elliptic equation to ensure grid orthogonality
  • Grid size is 381×81 in the circumferential direction (i-direction) and wall-normal direction (j-direction).
  • The grid contains 300 cells on the airfoil surface. The far-field location is 80 chords away from the airfoil. The height of the first mesh layer is 2.7e-6 chord.

CFD

  • Computed using the Reynolds Average Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver CFL3D.
    • finite volume method
    • MUSCL scheme, ROE scheme
    • Gauss-Seidel algorithm
  • Turbulence model: shear stress transport (SST) model

Data format

shape parameters (all_shapes_meta.parquet)

Please refer to this paper for a detailed description. Runze, LI, Yufei Zhang, and Haixin Chen*. 2023. "Knowledge discovery with computational fluid dynamics: Supercritical airfoil database and drag divergence prediction". Physics of Fluids, 35 (1): 016113.

Var Description
Running_ID Running sample ID for the sample. This is the unique ID for the shape among the VT dataset
Ref_Minf Reference Mach number
tmax Maximum relative thickness
Ref_CL Reference lift coefficient
Cd Drag coefficient under reference condition
X-1 shock wave position on chord
Mw-1 Wall Mach number at the beginning of the shock wave
Mw-A The highest wall Mach number behind the shock wave
Mw-L The highest wall Mach number on the upper surface (suction peak)
Mw-Q
Mw-M The highest wall Mach number on the lower surface
Mw-D
X-A The position of the highest wall Mach number behind the shock wave
x-tmax The position of maximum thickness
c-tmax The camber at maximum thickness
t0.2, t0.8 relative thickness at 0.2, 0.8 chord
c0.2, c0.5, c0.8 camber at 0.2, 0.5, 0.8 chord
vol volume of airfoil
RLE leading edge radius
TEA tailing edge angle
U1~U10 upper surface CST coefficients
L1~L10 lower surface CST coefficients

Meta for each dataset (index.npy)

Dataset FT VT-BUF VT-DD VT-GU
array size (16478, 10) (25607, 13) (17386, 13) (16031, 13)
0 airfoil index
1 condition index
2 ref index for the airfoil
3 aoa aoa ma aoa
4 ref aoa ref aoa ref ma ref aoa
5 ref ma ref ma ref aoa ref ma
6 ref cl ref cl ref cl ref cl
7 cl buffet aoa (estimated) / /
8 cd sepearation aoa / /
9 running idx cl " "
10 / cd " "
11 / running idx " "
12 / tmax " "

Volumetric flow field

The field is described with a structured grid for simulation. The i-direction is circling the airfoil, from far-field at wake to the trailing edge, then from the trailing edge through the lower surface to the leading edge; then go back through the upper surface. The j-direction is wall-normal from the airfoil surface to the farfield. We truncated the grid in j direction at 75 and in i direction from 25 to -25. This leads to a final grid size of 331×75331 \times 75

volume

At each grid point, 6 channels are provided. The first two are coordinates (x, y) of the cell vertex. The rest are four flow quantities (p, T, u, and v). They are NON-DIMENSIONAL with freestream condition (in CFL3D.prt way), and interpolated to the vertices.

p=p~p~,T=T~T~,u=u~u~,v=v~v~, p = \frac{\tilde p}{\tilde p_\infty}, T = \frac{\tilde T}{\tilde T_\infty}, u = \frac{\tilde u}{\tilde u_\infty}, v = \frac{\tilde v}{\tilde v_\infty}, where ~ stands for dimensional values.

Surface flow field

The surface pressure and skin-friction distributions are critical for analyzing aerodynamic coefficients and extracting key flow features. They are defined with

Cp=pp0.5ρV2,Cf=τw0.5ρV2,τw=μutsn C_p = \frac{p - p_\infty}{0.5\rho V_\infty^2}, \quad C_{f} = \frac{\tau_w}{0.5\rho_\infty V_\infty^2}, \quad \tau_w=\mu \frac{\partial u_t}{\partial s_n} where \bm{u_t} is the tangential velocity at the wall surface, while sns_n is the wall-normal coordinate. The positive value of CfC_f indicates that the flow is aligned with the flow for both surfaces.

The two quantities are interpolated and reported on a series of 401 xx reference points as

xi=cosa0πcos(a0(1ki)+a1ki)πcosa0πcosa1π,ki=in1. x_i = \frac{\cos a_0\pi - \cos\left( a_0 (1-k_i)+a_1 k_i\right)\pi}{\cos a_0\pi - cos a_1\pi},\quad k_i = \frac{i}{n-1}.

The final data consists of three channels: the yy coordinates of these reference points and the two coefficients.

surface