yuri1996/round_14_v2.2.6 · Datasets at Hugging Face

task_id string	winner string	ours_penalty float64	leader_penalty float64	gen_time float64	ours_ply_size_mb float64	issues string
0034f67a5a3e1fa3a785dcf12f0e4806de3665879c3b7adb45c02e95e46e3616	draw	4	4	24.035894	9.72	First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences
02449b777d8325a7f7e2042b2ee32ba0d1b4f49a09ffa1b1ec9f2cbd0067ae93	draw	6	6	26.116586	54.35	First model has similar flower type but lacks natural background and has simplified structure. Second model has different flower structure, added pots, and less natural appearance. Both have moderate to major issues with detail accuracy and naturalism.
03bf36122dc1da98a0fa45008c539a4899eec2cf7b659aff5c50fbbf9193d1d2	draw	3	3	24.914832	69.83	Both models have minor shape differences and slight variations in texture/positioning compared to the prompt, but overall match the general style and elements (chair with throw and pillow) of the prompt.
0581411a50cf5d7f30ab67e9d53ebbe793aadf3b2441c3ca402325326a3db86f	draw	3	4	22.752461	26.14	First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences
08716ba11520bf19be5fe52ab460dc5eebb88cc1fc6ec6ae467d6f15f31b6012	draw	4	5	22.866475	25.17	First model has minor shape differences and box variations; second model has significant box detail changes and material differences
08fca7169c278423c67ecaca8a226c7b5ea4d33d78ba7f81d50a322ed96df312	draw	5	5	22.730777	70.48	Both models have moderate issues with matching the prompt. They lack the detailed lighting effects, specific button designs, and the overall sleek, polished appearance of the original device. The screen content also doesn't match the vibrant underwater scene with the specific elements from the prompt.
0d1c433bf80c45138f3d795b61a08300b63590a6305b65ac945d46df70e80528	ours	4	6	20.080478	22.5	First model has simplified dragonfly with less detail, second model has incorrect style (no bowl) and major detail differences
0e9b8aa1b7c508a02a4a8427fb5d1808fc20978c0ccfc0565a42548f196f5031	draw	3	3	23.423018	49.37	Both models have minor shape differences in the pot and food item compared to the prompt, with some details not matching exactly
11a138bc419e5e61e904389c6bb5bcb9fede49a7873ad37316667f96abc9212e	leader	5	3	21.259285	34.7	First model has minor shape differences and less detailed texture matching; second model has closer shape but some texture variations
11a5f80d11d5fa36989b603419b6135b215cbb1d4d0966942652efae9b104143	draw	6	5	20.053776	22.64	Both models have moderate issues with style and detail matching the prompt. They lack the detailed neon lighting, specific control panel elements, and the vibrant color scheme of the original prompt. Some structural elements and button layouts are simplified.
11d30908bf1c6b65318373412b8a0a345cbbb1635dd53e523e245ca93a6ae08b	draw	4	3	21.986305	48.95	Both models have similar overall structure but differ in color vibrancy and detail consistency with the original prompt. The first model has more varied colors and clearer internal patterns, while the second has smoother color transitions. Both have minor shape differences and detail variations compared to the prompt.
124417db16e4b1b349178621cc957bdc1983431cb019b44ae7d8515a7f6242f0	draw	5	5	18.898577	11.03	First model has some shape differences and missing texture details compared to prompt. Second model has major issues with the hook structure and overall style not matching the prompt's realistic, detailed appearance.
14f80504c56effdd9bca0a1b6e5227c0083bde89fc874d5c45dc3390cf01e3ce	draw	6	6	22.194298	13.69	First model has similar structure but altered shape and perspective; second model has completely different form with bottle-like structure, major shape deviation
16ade48e2ea97d78f97543e81c65f98f0190889163344d82ea6f2341d081561b	draw	4	4	17.025034	14.23	First model has similar stained glass style but some shape differences and simplified details. Second model has different arch shape and less detailed stained glass pattern, more cartoonish style.
16c601301eb9677e98f04de0478b3d69e1ada51574cfd51d7e86029a3f81936e	draw	4	4	22.790169	15.69	First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details missing
1855c5592cfc3b8556c9c67a2c216bb7fd83826b8333520818ad774611872f49	draw	4	5	23.809149	61.59	First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has more significant style and detail issues
1b000364de44fc77208d95f6d155799f86a0def3cf6fee08a5fd4d985971c07d	draw	4	4	20.5812	21.37	First model has similar shape but lacks detailed lighting effects from prompt; second model has better color match but still lacks detailed lighting and has minor shape differences
1c548e3ed10a49f79e5df838136ae2a28b503a0d4c5bb3c71fedba0fb197f087	draw	4	3	23.264517	31.61	Both models have minor shape differences and some variations in bow placement compared to the prompt, but overall match the general style of a top hat with bow tie.
1e29dc9e121266792cac3d62f1d6353fac10fea2ad57215d677d86c11f813615	draw	6	5	19.849052	23.96	Both models have significant issues with the crown's structure and gemstone details. The first model has distorted gem shapes and unusual elements, while the second has incorrect proportions and gem arrangements. Neither matches the prompt's detailed, realistic crown with precise gem placement.
1f310cbf91cae354910c44c8a3ae402f010f222e8961e3a89fc0e84582128853	draw	3	4	23.308069	29.16	First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues compared to the prompt
1fde24c1fa597076c7ac343480ef30010c7306223f229276615c802270b839ed	draw	6	5	24.613885	41.33	Both models have significant issues with bowl count (original has single bowl, models have double bowls), shape details (original has specific contours and design elements), and text/branding accuracy. Both models show moderate deviations from the prompt's original mixer design.
203a8159ddbeab2a86a2a819f1b7c2ea24adb90e08ea89db63370eddc92947e3	draw	3	4	25.539748	45.53	First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues, with less accurate internal structure representation
2229cf5f-955c-4bc2-91c3-df9255a1c01d	draw	5	6	22.444979	12.8	First model has minor shape differences in the gemstone cut and prong design, second model has major issues with gemstone shape and prong style, both lack the detailed faceting and specific gemstone characteristics of the prompt
22de4efc4723f624b92889e8c79c9b4fb903e8a6b5907c9f0727ede8f2ccab47	draw	6	5	21.474378	39.47	Both models have different panel patterns and textures compared to the prompt image. First model has irregular, organic-shaped panels; second has more geometric, angular panels. Neither matches the prompt's detailed panel structure and texture.
22f497b84d9d8a3426bac9b7496af80a9c31deb0fda9c10c9e9833dea507ad1c	draw	5	5	22.216649	45.5	First model has minor differences in book arrangement and object details; second model has more significant style and detail differences, with altered book colors and arrangement
24553772-96b9-4c11-a880-56d125634a7a	draw	4	4	20.795814	37.07	First model has minor shape differences and missing small details compared to prompt; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details missing
282c299a1c43900c834d6fac46725fd58812ce8db538df628752eb8452ae0a00	draw	3	4	23.237789	36.49	First model has minor shape differences and slightly different details; second model has more significant style differences and missing details compared to the prompt
2ce24d6b8dd9f244bfd4c0851dd8f03184d93b0dc7bafc22feabb8c8adef523b	draw	4	4	24.369007	46.91	First model has minor shape differences and slightly different texture details; second model has more significant style differences and missing small structural details compared to the prompt
2ed72b6b9c9b345b17eca522a2584c99018da0f03990817ec082e8babe26291f	draw	4	4	21.493114	12.3	First model has similar general shape but lacks environmental details and has different antenna/mirror details. Second model has different overall style and proportions, with more angular design and different antenna/mirror details.
33532e138e69ddba7c5e762eed4bedb6b3fcd1a55302cd784c823d8d76d705f2	draw	5	5	21.813212	16.53	First model has similar general shape but lacks environmental context and some specific details from the prompt. Second model has more significant shape differences and less detail matching.
33827979d7e59540146de3bd1d75e2e1bee4d532e1a61f2426689a0f37baa943	draw	4	4	23.130049	22.42	First model has closer shape similarity but second has more significant style differences. Both have minor detail issues compared to prompt.
364f2e60a97f04ff4292f98b65e765c5bfbfd61615da2ff56ff9fbad4380f625	ours	4	6	23.620305	32.18	First model has some shape differences and less detail matching the prompt; second model has major issues with shape and texture, not matching the prompt's detailed appearance
37ca201e96add2bac00fa0ee34a36e0643f287da1e46eb336d6df4f42c708610	draw	4	4	21.533397	13.22	First model has minor shape differences and texture variations; second model has more significant detail issues and style deviations
38987a28c7b616879a23f7e08ac732df474b9e90684393521f765c04ed0b0fe6	draw	4	4	22.751814	23.38	First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details
3a0d4173e8316a33298c124eacbba9b20ca3cfed5f6307ee3bc945ab644ab1e1	draw	4	4	22.000162	13.81	First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences
3aff357f2c9bc317c083c24d896cdc32f43dd78f0831c3a359f67d08771d23de	draw	4	4	22.57968	70.52	First model has minor shape differences and missing small structural details compared to prompt. Second model has more significant style and structural differences, with altered geometric patterns and proportions.
3df9aac28adfa792e385c45498f7464601e572aaeeaf965ecd96e327f26569e2	draw	6	5	19.431193	13.37	Both models have moderate issues. They lack the detailed ancient script and aged appearance of the original prompt. The central figurine's shape and position varies, and the overall style doesn't capture the antique, aged brass appearance with detailed inscriptions as shown in the prompt.
3e743f77623f822d1f1f0264f823576aa8a20bd7344ba0dce92ef8ac63a82547	draw	6	5	23.127172	58.19	Both models have moderate issues. The glass ball's transparency and clarity don't match the prompt's clear glass. The tree details are less defined, and the base material doesn't match the prompt's golden texture. Bow and crown details are inconsistent with the prompt's style.
3f48598320210ac8659a36fd57bccddba1bc5acbab93ac579a0587321088aa84	draw	5	5	22.807535	24.66	First model has some shape differences and missing fine details; second model has major issues with style and structure, doesn't match the original's detailed floral engravings and polished finish
4024d0d716bab965da116c926ce66d038effa6491958e34b61aa503fdf91ee59	draw	4	4	22.826098	21.73	First model has minor detail differences (diamond placement, wood texture), second model has more significant style and detail issues (less ornate, different wood finish)
4265649c1aaeccc53febeeba273dd30e98a57271e3db940e0ac5652e3e33bd30	draw	4	4	21.233152	7.94	First model has minor shape differences and some detail inconsistencies; second model has more significant style and detail issues compared to the prompt
449de7f2e694785e0879713b2b4ce3330941e7bd607d8ff0d67ac5b326aacee8	draw	4	5	22.643018	46.23	First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has more significant issues with style and details
44ff32bf-1a77-4e7e-b45a-d8778393748a	leader	5	3	18.319979	3.02	First model has significant detail differences (missing ornate patterns, different handle textures), second model has closer match but still lacks some intricate details from the prompt
4593ab1c-a4fa-48a7-93c0-f17c57fa2af5	draw	4	4	22.444168	20.97	First model has minor shape differences and missing small details compared to prompt; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details missing
48fb4b27684ae9b4af97387ad0379a4312538bfee3af6ed3253eecb6a5b93d4f	draw	6	6	23.700233	76.09	First model has some shape similarities but lacks the precise faceting and clarity of the reference; second model has major shape and detail differences, not matching the reference's specific cut and appearance
4a46caa383a05ffe10f5ce524096cbd8c0c9916fc621f36a9731583d637846c4	draw	5	5	20.383467	29.16	Both models have significant style differences from the prompt. The prompt shows a sleek, glossy black robot with specific head design, red square eyes, and detailed mechanical joints. The generated models have different head shapes, eye designs (circular instead of square), and less detailed mechanical structure. Both models have moderate issues with matching the prompt's visual quality and style.
4e9106249bc34ce0ebc0429b6329293a3d9177332f7ba2e9cae930727289cac5	draw	4	3	22.675954	28.07	Both models have minor shape differences and slight detail variations compared to the prompt, but overall match the general form and components (wooden body with light-colored elements).
4f0bdbaa6affcb59438400cfd2d8be5f661e51f313673e4f44205e15a5c0165a	draw	4	3	20.182421	30.13	Both models generally match the prompt but have slight variations in color tone, texture details, and lighting. Some views show minor shape differences and the overall appearance isn't identical to the original prompt's specific lighting and texture.
525fbbdb868e86a55d2cae129d03ba345392e8ffdbe7ba6ca99ff1ecdc3cb984	draw	5	4	22.912025	27.69	Both models have similar blue cloak designs but differ in details like the figure's face, cloak texture, and overall style. They match the general concept but have moderate deviations from the prompt's specific visual quality.
55db1e0e8eb100747a50611d1897d3a8fc4d05e8bc6a2bd3586a43cdcb1a8616	draw	5	4	21.58044	11.45	Both models have moderate issues with style and details. The first model has some shape differences and missing small details, while the second model has wrong style elements and significant details missing compared to the prompt.
5806f9f3a8e69b8336a61f98fc0327e98749e8f50cfc00ac6ea7427e2db5cf8b	ours	4	6	23.156425	28.66	First model has color variations and laser beam style issues; second model lacks lasers and has different proportions
582b5fa7c5b21b3baf09bf58599e7b4082d21874be3afb3beb6a936a26cc0ffc	draw	6	5	21.482612	11.17	Both models have moderate issues. They match the general subject (gecko/lizard) but have significant differences in texture detail, color accuracy, and specific anatomical features compared to the reference image. The first model has better color matching but lacks fine scale details, while the second has smoother textures and different proportions.
5a5fbe25dd2291f41fcd4a1e2a2f066cf7d7475edcc602650ecff4bfadbc8028	draw	4	4	22.706943	21.13	First model has similar color scheme but slightly different shape and texture details; second model has different shape and some missing details, less accurate to original prompt
5aa3a22ae7830606ad5038ea1c7273995d7cd534f883b98fd3402e526ab79391	draw	6	6	23.499604	37.24	First model has color mismatch (burgundy vs brown), feather positioning and detail accuracy issues; second model has significant shape and style deviations, missing key details like the striped band's pattern and feather arrangement
5eaf242b81d934958f083ecc80e5eb718e47760646755c0180e640b1401f14f8	draw	6	5	22.509334	31.14	Both models have some shape differences from the prompt, with less detailed vegetation and flower placement. The first model has simpler structure and less variety in flowers, while the second has different plant arrangements and flower types. Both lack the specific details of the original image's lush greenery and flower variety.
69847a5d5949d8ce2877b864e7b9ad32ffc7e90b546414d5b79572f0a6669cad	draw	4	4	23.232836	27.92	First model has minor shape differences and slightly different texture details compared to prompt. Second model has more significant color variations and texture differences, with some elements appearing less detailed than the prompt.
6b042c50676b622a978dca8a732a26f8d56a35c8fbf74a4d4a4fcaa7afd886dc	draw	5	5	19.205546	13.51	Both models have significant text and detail mismatches with the prompt. Text is distorted, style is inconsistent, and small details like texture and specific design elements are missing. While the general book shape is maintained, the prompt adherence is poor.
6e1fa873a0f08a0e1079b858ed64cc40c9dee2c96833edb07fb1522a976dd2e6	draw	3	3	23.073145	27.36	Both models have minor shape differences and some variations in details like the lid knob and handle position compared to the prompt image. The overall form is similar but not perfect matches.
70010d16816f40ee956f3e2c396e03fadb5f4982d6c9356f35573d068de44611	draw	4	5	24.570705	49.6	First model has similar color scheme but slightly distorted shape; second model has muted colors and less accurate texture details
7171ad88e62858e96cbcd9f6cf1cad5c89f1bfb818f5d208ceacd24e489adb34	draw	5	6	22.610621	15.17	First model has some shape differences and missing small details; second model has major issues with overall structure and style not matching the prompt
71bc1ac0c0eb9bd1be4a7150a602ad7727947ed1c5248aba711d47690ea14e3a	draw	5	5	23.363178	80.56	Both models have significant issues with detail accuracy, material representation, and overall visual quality compared to the prompt. They lack the intricate gemstone detailing, precise ornamental patterns, and realistic lighting effects of the reference image. The first model has incorrect gem placement and texture, while the second has simplified decorative elements and wrong material rendering.
7811aa32454d6f1cf9ef5ff2a6958d94140e20c33c2fae079debfd26809c3539	leader	5	3	19.375345	15.93	First model has inconsistent lighting and slightly different bottle shape; second model has closer match but still has some lighting/texture variations
78eef3555870d070d454d48893f45d9d1d932da566a4c0bfb4701037d761eaed	draw	5	5	21.728304	9.56	Both models have moderate issues with style and details. They lack the detailed texture, lighting, and specific design elements (like the cockpit window shape, panel details, and overall weathered appearance) of the original prompt image. The first model has better color matching but still lacks detail, while the second has different proportions and less accurate detailing.
7976c38065b686a9d704de5b957e2acddf12c6a77979713f245262354ae776f2	draw	3	4	26.243285	81.94	First model has minor shape differences and slightly different texture details; second model has more significant style differences and less realistic appearance
79dba7120244f263228580c4069f51578a30f97304cc2f93c7b7c0666e9eb6b6	draw	4	4	23.453899	34.61	First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues, with less accurate unicorn features and floral patterns
7c7df949fd112c9a3b33311bcfa387160927231a5aa41cb3a0064618d1abe87e	draw	4	4	23.866802	60.64	First model has minor differences in book arrangement and shelf details; second model has more significant style and detail differences, including altered shelf angles and book selection
854c1449-39a1-4846-8af4-d6ebe8d4f619	draw	5	5	23.168438	33.42	First model has some shape differences and missing small details; second model has major issues with overall structure and details
8916afced891fe7c446c3e06d522c9ddff2605fffff84b578ba0dea1f4495730	draw	3	3	23.493288	37.02	Both models have minor shape differences and some detail variations compared to the prompt, but overall structure and concept match reasonably well
89e1b8998cc50f9be2f55127b09effa9030e523bec6d65b72f74d4c4db06099b	draw	4	4	22.98223	28.51	First model has minor differences in collar color, tail tip, and some detail variations. Second model has more noticeable differences in color tone, collar details, and facial features.
8a08215ae9ee2976fbddabdca5bc5046c9c8b9dc5829a336cf3bcba249fc00f5	draw	4	3	22.581867	25.04	Both models have similar general shape but differ in detail accuracy, texture quality, and specific feature matching to the original prompt image. Minor issues with facial features, horn details, and overall texture fidelity.
8dbd97f96c4d02a66fac4a71ae0d6377459b3400dca489574454a5bbecb57154	draw	4	4	21.037421	25.88	First model has minor shape differences and slightly different fruit placement; second model has more significant detail issues and altered overall appearance
92036f3abc8c73b3d2185d7afec12ab838bf0d50910b31c0c1d4f4114442d004	ours	4	6	20.725287	37.29	First model has some elements matching the prompt but has different layout and some details. Second model has major style differences with less similarity to the original prompt.
92b6f4511409351316f198024d3b849b9d86d469a6549722e70e0c0cee504916	draw	5	5	19.934824	24.26	First model has better detail matching but second model has significant simplification of flower structure and less realistic appearance. Both have similar color scheme but differ in detail complexity.
9878bf40b07cfc675cc42f91cfd4d911c3856c8e2258e19f7c0f7536320c0b64	draw	6	5	23.296461	36.66	Both models have some issues with matching the prompt. First model has different book colors and arrangement, second model has different roof details and book arrangement. Both have moderate issues with style and details.
988209beaf8802e7b01184b774fdbbc2b17bcac96dd102343e6bad1527504ee9	draw	3	3	21.536925	15.95	Both models generally match the prompt but have variations in basket texture, color, and flower arrangement details. Some baskets have different weaving patterns and colors than the reference, and flower positioning varies slightly.
9892e6f5c8dc0ccb7b453f21860dc2be3f7be0157c5add3c1943c65e1b278f44	leader	5	3	21.573113	43.41	First model has different proportions, simpler design, and inconsistent details compared to prompt. Second model has closer resemblance but still lacks some details and precision of the prompt.
9923a943b8a628ee3a16ca4111f5010e876e90b4f491e2cbd8a036f0bd4cb750	leader	4	1.5	19.579463	9.37	First model has minor shape differences and small surface details not matching prompt; second model perfectly matches prompt
99b7192fd902db75f393fda95ce3f811278636a6df92f6c691dc819890771116	draw	4	4	22.983945	31.01	First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has more significant issues with structure and style matching
9b22fb789fbc3d9e7cd50e4cc21300bcfac60930735d4653d97dfd6d9316ef84	draw	4	3	18.95194	12.29	Both models have minor shape differences and some detail variations compared to the prompt image. The first model has slightly different headstock details and string positioning, while the second has variations in wood texture and some component details. Both maintain the general shape and structure of the instrument in the prompt.
9c515261c35590822a4ff6f1fe5781aa55da3453bb8be5904aa2f0b1bf0fd0a8	draw	5	4	20.231848	25.3	Both models have some shape differences and color variations from the original prompt. The first model has pinkish glass and different top details, while the second has different glass shapes and overall structure. Both lack the specific aged texture and exact proportions of the original prompt.
9c6df3b2c14e9a312d3236417e1aea3aab531b70c487edfd1eeeee2fabbc79d2	draw	4	4	20.649846	35.74	Both models have minor shape differences and some missing small details compared to the prompt, but overall structure and style match reasonably well
9dbc68f175b56e60ae95f9511fb94546bbf4b49c0f5b7e5bf5b607cb38b19bc1	draw	5	6	18.529572	7.46	First model has some shape differences and material inconsistencies; second model has major structural and material deviations from the prompt
a4d44ab3b65677ae3e2194f4d9fe32a7d76ae039d5fc6fb684dd78a2fbf0adf9	draw	4	4	20.520838	31.11	First model has minor shape differences and lighting variations; second model has more significant style differences and detail issues
a60c5b2c3dafb223d0ecbd408995e8bb346960822148f78b30c106b1375e1ad6	draw	5	4	23.117637	25.22	Both models have minor shape differences from the prompt, with less detailed wood texture and simplified tulip arrangements. The background environment is missing in both models, and the overall scene composition differs significantly from the prompt's natural field setting.
a77062a2d0222debdbd68d33e96865cda4df9ac6a18d9f0a507033a9c79002e0	draw	4	4	22.25168	20.77	First model has minor shape differences and detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues compared to the original prompt.
aacb989d16471a364824ac145d8b06fa273e3a8ac0af3ed6ea78e1656777d830	draw	4	4	22.540355	25.69	First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details
ab455629abc3223b6b448253da59120dccdceccf123354ceadd5a904e2bed8d3	draw	4	4	21.930464	41.26	First model has minor shape differences and some detail inconsistencies; second model has more significant style and detail issues compared to the prompt
ab506d408112974e5ba8f2a6dcae249e7c2674b6e60f0dff4053a9ddc28fbd33	draw	4	3	19.891324	22.58	Both models generally match the prompt but have minor variations in flower arrangement, detail density, and some stylistic differences. Shapes are similar but not identical, and some flowers appear slightly different in size and placement.
accbba278390739a94975fe2a61c53e7b30e6fa17cb8e8b9bb7bc572a5fb8d44	draw	6	6	25.494399	69.87	First model has some shape differences and missing details compared to prompt, second model has major issues with central component and overall structure not matching prompt
acd3d46a7d9b6cfbc7337bbfc6a785524933994f198df4d4c6211721d33846c6	draw	3	3	21.791713	10.7	Both models have minor shape differences and slight detail variations compared to the prompt, but overall match the cylindrical component with threaded ends and central opening.
aebc379c6b12425cd01b6ddd3f6adc644c2ad09b27300f48f2d9f7d1ccb65f8a	draw	5	5	21.842964	11.31	Both models have some issues with matching the prompt. The first model has different candle colors and flame details, while the second model has variations in the candelabra's design and details. Both lack the specific golden texture and lighting quality of the original prompt.
afd25f32172975ac089bf170a52a6fea54fd6270042ad3c392fcd5d16dd1da1d	draw	4	4	19.667292	24.37	First model has closer resemblance but has some detail differences; second model has more significant style and detail deviations
b110ed3a3548f903076d10ed37efd1117e153cb0248215db63c8c27eb31f0144	draw	6	5	20.090896	21.07	Both models have similar color schemes but differ in patch patterns, shape details, and basket appearance. They match the general hot air balloon concept but have moderate deviations from the original prompt's specific visual details.
b57421b571110de4bc492bce2481407f7740fc4242178a232f0dc34246bc1df4	draw	4	4	22.590923	14.66	First model has better color matching and puzzle piece details, second model has simpler style with less detail. Both have general shape similarity but second has more significant deviations in style and detail.
b8a0a728fa4a2f2b7160fa0f5a8df2dbb0d53b338010ce310d1d3e1625d1de92	draw	4	4	21.997297	13.62	First model has minor shape differences and lighting variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences
ba495014c7920c09602f1ecc0c75c051f005dcb6a8bbf132d07ede2ee43b9e32	draw	4	4	23.121082	40.11	First model has minor shape differences and missing small details compared to prompt; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details missing
bce2d1db387cfd5acf13509c542fe3cd722b31a11980419487b502f830cd4a44	draw	4	5	24.637148	63.75	First model has minor shape differences and slightly different plant arrangement; second model has more significant style differences, altered box structure, and different plant details
bde166eae9a467e70699be378dfd90814e7fa9637899667631fd2729fb7bdf47	draw	3	3	21.40845	6.58	Both models have similar overall structure but show minor differences in details like body proportions, joint designs, and specific feature placements compared to the prompt image. The first model has slightly more defined mechanical details while the second has smoother transitions in some areas.
be94887e8e032e46d4bbd2f2024382c94b103450d42bf7b9ce9eb28198be507c	draw	4	4	22.724456	21.73	First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details
c1abfbc5fb9bc7f6d31a03986d730328e1757e24a12f27824fc77ef17ff51578	draw	6	5	26.76718	57.11	Both models have moderate issues. The first model has less detailed crystals and a less defined interior structure. The second model has simplified crystal shapes and less texture detail. Both lack the high level of detail, color vibrancy, and lighting quality of the original prompt image.

0034f67a5a3e1fa3a785dcf12f0e4806de3665879c3b7adb45c02e95e46e3616

draw

4

24.035894

9.72

First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences

02449b777d8325a7f7e2042b2ee32ba0d1b4f49a09ffa1b1ec9f2cbd0067ae93

draw

6

26.116586

54.35

First model has similar flower type but lacks natural background and has simplified structure. Second model has different flower structure, added pots, and less natural appearance. Both have moderate to major issues with detail accuracy and naturalism.

03bf36122dc1da98a0fa45008c539a4899eec2cf7b659aff5c50fbbf9193d1d2

draw

3

24.914832

69.83

Both models have minor shape differences and slight variations in texture/positioning compared to the prompt, but overall match the general style and elements (chair with throw and pillow) of the prompt.

0581411a50cf5d7f30ab67e9d53ebbe793aadf3b2441c3ca402325326a3db86f

draw

3

4

22.752461

26.14

First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences

08716ba11520bf19be5fe52ab460dc5eebb88cc1fc6ec6ae467d6f15f31b6012

draw

4

5

22.866475

25.17

First model has minor shape differences and box variations; second model has significant box detail changes and material differences

08fca7169c278423c67ecaca8a226c7b5ea4d33d78ba7f81d50a322ed96df312

draw

5

22.730777

70.48

Both models have moderate issues with matching the prompt. They lack the detailed lighting effects, specific button designs, and the overall sleek, polished appearance of the original device. The screen content also doesn't match the vibrant underwater scene with the specific elements from the prompt.

0d1c433bf80c45138f3d795b61a08300b63590a6305b65ac945d46df70e80528

ours

4

6

20.080478

22.5

First model has simplified dragonfly with less detail, second model has incorrect style (no bowl) and major detail differences

0e9b8aa1b7c508a02a4a8427fb5d1808fc20978c0ccfc0565a42548f196f5031

draw

3

23.423018

49.37

Both models have minor shape differences in the pot and food item compared to the prompt, with some details not matching exactly

11a138bc419e5e61e904389c6bb5bcb9fede49a7873ad37316667f96abc9212e

leader

5

3

21.259285

34.7

First model has minor shape differences and less detailed texture matching; second model has closer shape but some texture variations

11a5f80d11d5fa36989b603419b6135b215cbb1d4d0966942652efae9b104143

draw

6

5

20.053776

22.64

Both models have moderate issues with style and detail matching the prompt. They lack the detailed neon lighting, specific control panel elements, and the vibrant color scheme of the original prompt. Some structural elements and button layouts are simplified.

11d30908bf1c6b65318373412b8a0a345cbbb1635dd53e523e245ca93a6ae08b

draw

4

3

21.986305

48.95

Both models have similar overall structure but differ in color vibrancy and detail consistency with the original prompt. The first model has more varied colors and clearer internal patterns, while the second has smoother color transitions. Both have minor shape differences and detail variations compared to the prompt.

124417db16e4b1b349178621cc957bdc1983431cb019b44ae7d8515a7f6242f0

draw

5

18.898577

11.03

First model has some shape differences and missing texture details compared to prompt. Second model has major issues with the hook structure and overall style not matching the prompt's realistic, detailed appearance.

14f80504c56effdd9bca0a1b6e5227c0083bde89fc874d5c45dc3390cf01e3ce

draw

6

22.194298

13.69

First model has similar structure but altered shape and perspective; second model has completely different form with bottle-like structure, major shape deviation

16ade48e2ea97d78f97543e81c65f98f0190889163344d82ea6f2341d081561b

draw

4

17.025034

14.23

First model has similar stained glass style but some shape differences and simplified details. Second model has different arch shape and less detailed stained glass pattern, more cartoonish style.

16c601301eb9677e98f04de0478b3d69e1ada51574cfd51d7e86029a3f81936e

draw

4

22.790169

15.69

First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details missing

1855c5592cfc3b8556c9c67a2c216bb7fd83826b8333520818ad774611872f49

draw

4

5

23.809149

61.59

First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has more significant style and detail issues

1b000364de44fc77208d95f6d155799f86a0def3cf6fee08a5fd4d985971c07d

draw

4

20.5812

21.37

First model has similar shape but lacks detailed lighting effects from prompt; second model has better color match but still lacks detailed lighting and has minor shape differences

1c548e3ed10a49f79e5df838136ae2a28b503a0d4c5bb3c71fedba0fb197f087

draw

4

3

23.264517

31.61

Both models have minor shape differences and some variations in bow placement compared to the prompt, but overall match the general style of a top hat with bow tie.

1e29dc9e121266792cac3d62f1d6353fac10fea2ad57215d677d86c11f813615

draw

6

5

19.849052

23.96

Both models have significant issues with the crown's structure and gemstone details. The first model has distorted gem shapes and unusual elements, while the second has incorrect proportions and gem arrangements. Neither matches the prompt's detailed, realistic crown with precise gem placement.

1f310cbf91cae354910c44c8a3ae402f010f222e8961e3a89fc0e84582128853

draw

3

4

23.308069

29.16

First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues compared to the prompt

1fde24c1fa597076c7ac343480ef30010c7306223f229276615c802270b839ed

draw

6

5

24.613885

41.33

Both models have significant issues with bowl count (original has single bowl, models have double bowls), shape details (original has specific contours and design elements), and text/branding accuracy. Both models show moderate deviations from the prompt's original mixer design.

203a8159ddbeab2a86a2a819f1b7c2ea24adb90e08ea89db63370eddc92947e3

draw

3

4

25.539748

45.53

First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues, with less accurate internal structure representation

2229cf5f-955c-4bc2-91c3-df9255a1c01d

draw

5

6

22.444979

12.8

First model has minor shape differences in the gemstone cut and prong design, second model has major issues with gemstone shape and prong style, both lack the detailed faceting and specific gemstone characteristics of the prompt

22de4efc4723f624b92889e8c79c9b4fb903e8a6b5907c9f0727ede8f2ccab47

draw

6

5

21.474378

39.47

Both models have different panel patterns and textures compared to the prompt image. First model has irregular, organic-shaped panels; second has more geometric, angular panels. Neither matches the prompt's detailed panel structure and texture.

22f497b84d9d8a3426bac9b7496af80a9c31deb0fda9c10c9e9833dea507ad1c

draw

5

22.216649

45.5

First model has minor differences in book arrangement and object details; second model has more significant style and detail differences, with altered book colors and arrangement

24553772-96b9-4c11-a880-56d125634a7a

draw

4

20.795814

37.07

First model has minor shape differences and missing small details compared to prompt; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details missing

282c299a1c43900c834d6fac46725fd58812ce8db538df628752eb8452ae0a00

draw

3

4

23.237789

36.49

First model has minor shape differences and slightly different details; second model has more significant style differences and missing details compared to the prompt

2ce24d6b8dd9f244bfd4c0851dd8f03184d93b0dc7bafc22feabb8c8adef523b

draw

4

24.369007

46.91

First model has minor shape differences and slightly different texture details; second model has more significant style differences and missing small structural details compared to the prompt

2ed72b6b9c9b345b17eca522a2584c99018da0f03990817ec082e8babe26291f

draw

4

21.493114

12.3

First model has similar general shape but lacks environmental details and has different antenna/mirror details. Second model has different overall style and proportions, with more angular design and different antenna/mirror details.

33532e138e69ddba7c5e762eed4bedb6b3fcd1a55302cd784c823d8d76d705f2

draw

5

21.813212

16.53

First model has similar general shape but lacks environmental context and some specific details from the prompt. Second model has more significant shape differences and less detail matching.

33827979d7e59540146de3bd1d75e2e1bee4d532e1a61f2426689a0f37baa943

draw

4

23.130049

22.42

First model has closer shape similarity but second has more significant style differences. Both have minor detail issues compared to prompt.

364f2e60a97f04ff4292f98b65e765c5bfbfd61615da2ff56ff9fbad4380f625

ours

4

6

23.620305

32.18

First model has some shape differences and less detail matching the prompt; second model has major issues with shape and texture, not matching the prompt's detailed appearance

37ca201e96add2bac00fa0ee34a36e0643f287da1e46eb336d6df4f42c708610

draw

4

21.533397

13.22

First model has minor shape differences and texture variations; second model has more significant detail issues and style deviations

38987a28c7b616879a23f7e08ac732df474b9e90684393521f765c04ed0b0fe6

draw

4

22.751814

23.38

First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details

3a0d4173e8316a33298c124eacbba9b20ca3cfed5f6307ee3bc945ab644ab1e1

draw

4

22.000162

13.81

First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences

3aff357f2c9bc317c083c24d896cdc32f43dd78f0831c3a359f67d08771d23de

draw

4

22.57968

70.52

First model has minor shape differences and missing small structural details compared to prompt. Second model has more significant style and structural differences, with altered geometric patterns and proportions.

3df9aac28adfa792e385c45498f7464601e572aaeeaf965ecd96e327f26569e2

draw

6

5

19.431193

13.37

Both models have moderate issues. They lack the detailed ancient script and aged appearance of the original prompt. The central figurine's shape and position varies, and the overall style doesn't capture the antique, aged brass appearance with detailed inscriptions as shown in the prompt.

3e743f77623f822d1f1f0264f823576aa8a20bd7344ba0dce92ef8ac63a82547

draw

6

5

23.127172

58.19

Both models have moderate issues. The glass ball's transparency and clarity don't match the prompt's clear glass. The tree details are less defined, and the base material doesn't match the prompt's golden texture. Bow and crown details are inconsistent with the prompt's style.

3f48598320210ac8659a36fd57bccddba1bc5acbab93ac579a0587321088aa84

draw

5

22.807535

24.66

First model has some shape differences and missing fine details; second model has major issues with style and structure, doesn't match the original's detailed floral engravings and polished finish

4024d0d716bab965da116c926ce66d038effa6491958e34b61aa503fdf91ee59

draw

4

22.826098

21.73

First model has minor detail differences (diamond placement, wood texture), second model has more significant style and detail issues (less ornate, different wood finish)

4265649c1aaeccc53febeeba273dd30e98a57271e3db940e0ac5652e3e33bd30

draw

4

21.233152

7.94

First model has minor shape differences and some detail inconsistencies; second model has more significant style and detail issues compared to the prompt

449de7f2e694785e0879713b2b4ce3330941e7bd607d8ff0d67ac5b326aacee8

draw

4

5

22.643018

46.23

First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has more significant issues with style and details

44ff32bf-1a77-4e7e-b45a-d8778393748a

leader

5

3

18.319979

3.02

First model has significant detail differences (missing ornate patterns, different handle textures), second model has closer match but still lacks some intricate details from the prompt

4593ab1c-a4fa-48a7-93c0-f17c57fa2af5

draw

4

22.444168

20.97

First model has minor shape differences and missing small details compared to prompt; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details missing

48fb4b27684ae9b4af97387ad0379a4312538bfee3af6ed3253eecb6a5b93d4f

draw

6

23.700233

76.09

First model has some shape similarities but lacks the precise faceting and clarity of the reference; second model has major shape and detail differences, not matching the reference's specific cut and appearance

4a46caa383a05ffe10f5ce524096cbd8c0c9916fc621f36a9731583d637846c4

draw

5

20.383467

29.16

Both models have significant style differences from the prompt. The prompt shows a sleek, glossy black robot with specific head design, red square eyes, and detailed mechanical joints. The generated models have different head shapes, eye designs (circular instead of square), and less detailed mechanical structure. Both models have moderate issues with matching the prompt's visual quality and style.

4e9106249bc34ce0ebc0429b6329293a3d9177332f7ba2e9cae930727289cac5

draw

4

3

22.675954

28.07

Both models have minor shape differences and slight detail variations compared to the prompt, but overall match the general form and components (wooden body with light-colored elements).

4f0bdbaa6affcb59438400cfd2d8be5f661e51f313673e4f44205e15a5c0165a

draw

4

3

20.182421

30.13

Both models generally match the prompt but have slight variations in color tone, texture details, and lighting. Some views show minor shape differences and the overall appearance isn't identical to the original prompt's specific lighting and texture.

525fbbdb868e86a55d2cae129d03ba345392e8ffdbe7ba6ca99ff1ecdc3cb984

draw

5

4

22.912025

27.69

Both models have similar blue cloak designs but differ in details like the figure's face, cloak texture, and overall style. They match the general concept but have moderate deviations from the prompt's specific visual quality.

55db1e0e8eb100747a50611d1897d3a8fc4d05e8bc6a2bd3586a43cdcb1a8616

draw

5

4

21.58044

11.45

Both models have moderate issues with style and details. The first model has some shape differences and missing small details, while the second model has wrong style elements and significant details missing compared to the prompt.

5806f9f3a8e69b8336a61f98fc0327e98749e8f50cfc00ac6ea7427e2db5cf8b

ours

4

6

23.156425

28.66

First model has color variations and laser beam style issues; second model lacks lasers and has different proportions

582b5fa7c5b21b3baf09bf58599e7b4082d21874be3afb3beb6a936a26cc0ffc

draw

6

5

21.482612

11.17

Both models have moderate issues. They match the general subject (gecko/lizard) but have significant differences in texture detail, color accuracy, and specific anatomical features compared to the reference image. The first model has better color matching but lacks fine scale details, while the second has smoother textures and different proportions.

5a5fbe25dd2291f41fcd4a1e2a2f066cf7d7475edcc602650ecff4bfadbc8028

draw

4

22.706943

21.13

First model has similar color scheme but slightly different shape and texture details; second model has different shape and some missing details, less accurate to original prompt

5aa3a22ae7830606ad5038ea1c7273995d7cd534f883b98fd3402e526ab79391

draw

6

23.499604

37.24

First model has color mismatch (burgundy vs brown), feather positioning and detail accuracy issues; second model has significant shape and style deviations, missing key details like the striped band's pattern and feather arrangement

5eaf242b81d934958f083ecc80e5eb718e47760646755c0180e640b1401f14f8

draw

6

5

22.509334

31.14

Both models have some shape differences from the prompt, with less detailed vegetation and flower placement. The first model has simpler structure and less variety in flowers, while the second has different plant arrangements and flower types. Both lack the specific details of the original image's lush greenery and flower variety.

69847a5d5949d8ce2877b864e7b9ad32ffc7e90b546414d5b79572f0a6669cad

draw

4

23.232836

27.92

First model has minor shape differences and slightly different texture details compared to prompt. Second model has more significant color variations and texture differences, with some elements appearing less detailed than the prompt.

6b042c50676b622a978dca8a732a26f8d56a35c8fbf74a4d4a4fcaa7afd886dc

draw

5

19.205546

13.51

Both models have significant text and detail mismatches with the prompt. Text is distorted, style is inconsistent, and small details like texture and specific design elements are missing. While the general book shape is maintained, the prompt adherence is poor.

6e1fa873a0f08a0e1079b858ed64cc40c9dee2c96833edb07fb1522a976dd2e6

draw

3

23.073145

27.36

Both models have minor shape differences and some variations in details like the lid knob and handle position compared to the prompt image. The overall form is similar but not perfect matches.

70010d16816f40ee956f3e2c396e03fadb5f4982d6c9356f35573d068de44611

draw

4

5

24.570705

49.6

First model has similar color scheme but slightly distorted shape; second model has muted colors and less accurate texture details

7171ad88e62858e96cbcd9f6cf1cad5c89f1bfb818f5d208ceacd24e489adb34

draw

5

6

22.610621

15.17

First model has some shape differences and missing small details; second model has major issues with overall structure and style not matching the prompt

71bc1ac0c0eb9bd1be4a7150a602ad7727947ed1c5248aba711d47690ea14e3a

draw

5

23.363178

80.56

Both models have significant issues with detail accuracy, material representation, and overall visual quality compared to the prompt. They lack the intricate gemstone detailing, precise ornamental patterns, and realistic lighting effects of the reference image. The first model has incorrect gem placement and texture, while the second has simplified decorative elements and wrong material rendering.

7811aa32454d6f1cf9ef5ff2a6958d94140e20c33c2fae079debfd26809c3539

leader

5

3

19.375345

15.93

First model has inconsistent lighting and slightly different bottle shape; second model has closer match but still has some lighting/texture variations

78eef3555870d070d454d48893f45d9d1d932da566a4c0bfb4701037d761eaed

draw

5

21.728304

9.56

Both models have moderate issues with style and details. They lack the detailed texture, lighting, and specific design elements (like the cockpit window shape, panel details, and overall weathered appearance) of the original prompt image. The first model has better color matching but still lacks detail, while the second has different proportions and less accurate detailing.

7976c38065b686a9d704de5b957e2acddf12c6a77979713f245262354ae776f2

draw

3

4

26.243285

81.94

First model has minor shape differences and slightly different texture details; second model has more significant style differences and less realistic appearance

79dba7120244f263228580c4069f51578a30f97304cc2f93c7b7c0666e9eb6b6

draw

4

23.453899

34.61

First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues, with less accurate unicorn features and floral patterns

7c7df949fd112c9a3b33311bcfa387160927231a5aa41cb3a0064618d1abe87e

draw

4

23.866802

60.64

First model has minor differences in book arrangement and shelf details; second model has more significant style and detail differences, including altered shelf angles and book selection

854c1449-39a1-4846-8af4-d6ebe8d4f619

draw

5

23.168438

33.42

First model has some shape differences and missing small details; second model has major issues with overall structure and details

8916afced891fe7c446c3e06d522c9ddff2605fffff84b578ba0dea1f4495730

draw

3

23.493288

37.02

Both models have minor shape differences and some detail variations compared to the prompt, but overall structure and concept match reasonably well

89e1b8998cc50f9be2f55127b09effa9030e523bec6d65b72f74d4c4db06099b

draw

4

22.98223

28.51

First model has minor differences in collar color, tail tip, and some detail variations. Second model has more noticeable differences in color tone, collar details, and facial features.

8a08215ae9ee2976fbddabdca5bc5046c9c8b9dc5829a336cf3bcba249fc00f5

draw

4

3

22.581867

25.04

Both models have similar general shape but differ in detail accuracy, texture quality, and specific feature matching to the original prompt image. Minor issues with facial features, horn details, and overall texture fidelity.

8dbd97f96c4d02a66fac4a71ae0d6377459b3400dca489574454a5bbecb57154

draw

4

21.037421

25.88

First model has minor shape differences and slightly different fruit placement; second model has more significant detail issues and altered overall appearance

92036f3abc8c73b3d2185d7afec12ab838bf0d50910b31c0c1d4f4114442d004

ours

4

6

20.725287

37.29

First model has some elements matching the prompt but has different layout and some details. Second model has major style differences with less similarity to the original prompt.

92b6f4511409351316f198024d3b849b9d86d469a6549722e70e0c0cee504916

draw

5

19.934824

24.26

First model has better detail matching but second model has significant simplification of flower structure and less realistic appearance. Both have similar color scheme but differ in detail complexity.

9878bf40b07cfc675cc42f91cfd4d911c3856c8e2258e19f7c0f7536320c0b64

draw

6

5

23.296461

36.66

Both models have some issues with matching the prompt. First model has different book colors and arrangement, second model has different roof details and book arrangement. Both have moderate issues with style and details.

988209beaf8802e7b01184b774fdbbc2b17bcac96dd102343e6bad1527504ee9

draw

3

21.536925

15.95

Both models generally match the prompt but have variations in basket texture, color, and flower arrangement details. Some baskets have different weaving patterns and colors than the reference, and flower positioning varies slightly.

9892e6f5c8dc0ccb7b453f21860dc2be3f7be0157c5add3c1943c65e1b278f44

leader

5

3

21.573113

43.41

First model has different proportions, simpler design, and inconsistent details compared to prompt. Second model has closer resemblance but still lacks some details and precision of the prompt.

9923a943b8a628ee3a16ca4111f5010e876e90b4f491e2cbd8a036f0bd4cb750

leader

4

1.5

19.579463

9.37

First model has minor shape differences and small surface details not matching prompt; second model perfectly matches prompt

99b7192fd902db75f393fda95ce3f811278636a6df92f6c691dc819890771116

draw

4

22.983945

31.01

First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has more significant issues with structure and style matching

9b22fb789fbc3d9e7cd50e4cc21300bcfac60930735d4653d97dfd6d9316ef84

draw

4

3

18.95194

12.29

Both models have minor shape differences and some detail variations compared to the prompt image. The first model has slightly different headstock details and string positioning, while the second has variations in wood texture and some component details. Both maintain the general shape and structure of the instrument in the prompt.

9c515261c35590822a4ff6f1fe5781aa55da3453bb8be5904aa2f0b1bf0fd0a8

draw

5

4

20.231848

25.3

Both models have some shape differences and color variations from the original prompt. The first model has pinkish glass and different top details, while the second has different glass shapes and overall structure. Both lack the specific aged texture and exact proportions of the original prompt.

9c6df3b2c14e9a312d3236417e1aea3aab531b70c487edfd1eeeee2fabbc79d2

draw

4

20.649846

35.74

Both models have minor shape differences and some missing small details compared to the prompt, but overall structure and style match reasonably well

9dbc68f175b56e60ae95f9511fb94546bbf4b49c0f5b7e5bf5b607cb38b19bc1

draw

5

6

18.529572

7.46

First model has some shape differences and material inconsistencies; second model has major structural and material deviations from the prompt

a4d44ab3b65677ae3e2194f4d9fe32a7d76ae039d5fc6fb684dd78a2fbf0adf9

draw

4

20.520838

31.11

First model has minor shape differences and lighting variations; second model has more significant style differences and detail issues

a60c5b2c3dafb223d0ecbd408995e8bb346960822148f78b30c106b1375e1ad6

draw

5

4

23.117637

25.22

Both models have minor shape differences from the prompt, with less detailed wood texture and simplified tulip arrangements. The background environment is missing in both models, and the overall scene composition differs significantly from the prompt's natural field setting.

a77062a2d0222debdbd68d33e96865cda4df9ac6a18d9f0a507033a9c79002e0

draw

4

22.25168

20.77

First model has minor shape differences and detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues compared to the original prompt.

aacb989d16471a364824ac145d8b06fa273e3a8ac0af3ed6ea78e1656777d830

draw

4

22.540355

25.69

First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details

ab455629abc3223b6b448253da59120dccdceccf123354ceadd5a904e2bed8d3

draw

4

21.930464

41.26

First model has minor shape differences and some detail inconsistencies; second model has more significant style and detail issues compared to the prompt

ab506d408112974e5ba8f2a6dcae249e7c2674b6e60f0dff4053a9ddc28fbd33

draw

4

3

19.891324

22.58

Both models generally match the prompt but have minor variations in flower arrangement, detail density, and some stylistic differences. Shapes are similar but not identical, and some flowers appear slightly different in size and placement.

accbba278390739a94975fe2a61c53e7b30e6fa17cb8e8b9bb7bc572a5fb8d44

draw

6

25.494399

69.87

First model has some shape differences and missing details compared to prompt, second model has major issues with central component and overall structure not matching prompt

acd3d46a7d9b6cfbc7337bbfc6a785524933994f198df4d4c6211721d33846c6

draw

3

21.791713

10.7

Both models have minor shape differences and slight detail variations compared to the prompt, but overall match the cylindrical component with threaded ends and central opening.

aebc379c6b12425cd01b6ddd3f6adc644c2ad09b27300f48f2d9f7d1ccb65f8a

draw

5

21.842964

11.31

Both models have some issues with matching the prompt. The first model has different candle colors and flame details, while the second model has variations in the candelabra's design and details. Both lack the specific golden texture and lighting quality of the original prompt.

afd25f32172975ac089bf170a52a6fea54fd6270042ad3c392fcd5d16dd1da1d

draw

4

19.667292

24.37

First model has closer resemblance but has some detail differences; second model has more significant style and detail deviations

b110ed3a3548f903076d10ed37efd1117e153cb0248215db63c8c27eb31f0144

draw

6

5

20.090896

21.07

Both models have similar color schemes but differ in patch patterns, shape details, and basket appearance. They match the general hot air balloon concept but have moderate deviations from the original prompt's specific visual details.

b57421b571110de4bc492bce2481407f7740fc4242178a232f0dc34246bc1df4

draw

4

22.590923

14.66

First model has better color matching and puzzle piece details, second model has simpler style with less detail. Both have general shape similarity but second has more significant deviations in style and detail.

b8a0a728fa4a2f2b7160fa0f5a8df2dbb0d53b338010ce310d1d3e1625d1de92

draw

4

21.997297

13.62

First model has minor shape differences and lighting variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences

ba495014c7920c09602f1ecc0c75c051f005dcb6a8bbf132d07ede2ee43b9e32

draw

4

23.121082

40.11

First model has minor shape differences and missing small details compared to prompt; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details missing

bce2d1db387cfd5acf13509c542fe3cd722b31a11980419487b502f830cd4a44

draw

4

5

24.637148

63.75

First model has minor shape differences and slightly different plant arrangement; second model has more significant style differences, altered box structure, and different plant details

bde166eae9a467e70699be378dfd90814e7fa9637899667631fd2729fb7bdf47

draw

3

21.40845

6.58

Both models have similar overall structure but show minor differences in details like body proportions, joint designs, and specific feature placements compared to the prompt image. The first model has slightly more defined mechanical details while the second has smoother transitions in some areas.

be94887e8e032e46d4bbd2f2024382c94b103450d42bf7b9ce9eb28198be507c

draw

4

22.724456

21.73

First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details

c1abfbc5fb9bc7f6d31a03986d730328e1757e24a12f27824fc77ef17ff51578

draw

6

5

26.76718

57.11

Both models have moderate issues. The first model has less detailed crystals and a less defined interior structure. The second model has simplified crystal shapes and less texture detail. Both lack the high level of detail, color vibrancy, and lighting quality of the original prompt image.

Metric	Value
Total Tasks	128
Total Judged	128
Skipped	0
Gen Failed	0
Render Failed	0
Judge Failed	0

Result	Count
🏆 WINS	5
🤝 DRAWS	117
❌ LOSSES	6

Metric	Value
Win Rate	3.9%
Margin	-0.8%
Avg Gen Time	22.19s

Datasets:

yuri1996
/

round_14_v2.2.6

Benchmark Results: v2.2.6

Overview

Summary

Results

Performance

Methodology

Files