Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
task_id
stringlengths
36
64
origin
imagewidth (px)
1.02k
1.02k
ours
imagewidth (px)
1.04k
1.04k
leader
imagewidth (px)
1.04k
1.04k
winner
stringclasses
3 values
ours_penalty
float64
3
6.5
leader_penalty
float64
3
6
gen_time
float64
19.3
35
ours_ply_size_mb
float64
1.97
84.8
issues
stringlengths
78
454
0034f67a5a3e1fa3a785dcf12f0e4806de3665879c3b7adb45c02e95e46e3616
draw
4
4
21.578353
11.02
First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences
02449b777d8325a7f7e2042b2ee32ba0d1b4f49a09ffa1b1ec9f2cbd0067ae93
draw
6
6
26.63418
57.22
First model has similar flower type but lacks natural background and has simplified structure. Second model has different flower structure, added pots, and less natural appearance. Both have moderate to major issues with detail accuracy and naturalism.
03bf36122dc1da98a0fa45008c539a4899eec2cf7b659aff5c50fbbf9193d1d2
draw
3
3
28.484968
66.02
Both models have minor shape differences and slight variations in fabric texture compared to the prompt, but overall match the chair type and general appearance.
0581411a50cf5d7f30ab67e9d53ebbe793aadf3b2441c3ca402325326a3db86f
draw
4
4
25.565721
25.55
First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences
08716ba11520bf19be5fe52ab460dc5eebb88cc1fc6ec6ae467d6f15f31b6012
draw
6
5
25.247191
29.75
Both models have significant style differences from the prompt. The first model has decorative elements on the box that don't match the prompt's simple wooden box, and the second model has different box textures and horn details. Both models have altered proportions and styling of the horn and box compared to the prompt.
08fca7169c278423c67ecaca8a226c7b5ea4d33d78ba7f81d50a322ed96df312
draw
5
5
22.214965
66.7
Both models have some shape differences from the prompt, with moderate issues in button placement, screen content details, and overall form matching. Neither is a perfect match but not completely wrong.
0d1c433bf80c45138f3d795b61a08300b63590a6305b65ac945d46df70e80528
ours
4
6
20.388805
22.3
First model has basic shape but lacks detailed wing structure and metallic finish; second model is completely unrelated (no bowl) with different style and structure
0e9b8aa1b7c508a02a4a8427fb5d1808fc20978c0ccfc0565a42548f196f5031
draw
4
4
27.667519
48.9
Both models have minor shape differences in the pot and food item, with some details not matching the original prompt's texture and lighting. The color and overall composition are close but not perfect matches.
11a138bc419e5e61e904389c6bb5bcb9fede49a7873ad37316667f96abc9212e
draw
4
3
21.35391
33.46
Both models have similar shape but differ in detail quality and color consistency. The first model has more defined shape and better color matching to the prompt, while the second has smoother but less accurate details. Both have minor issues with the internal sprinkles and overall texture precision.
11a5f80d11d5fa36989b603419b6135b215cbb1d4d0966942652efae9b104143
draw
5
5
20.082572
19.5
Both models have moderate issues with style and details. The first model has some color variations and detail differences, while the second model has different button layouts and structural details. Neither perfectly matches the prompt's visual quality and specific design elements.
11d30908bf1c6b65318373412b8a0a345cbbb1635dd53e523e245ca93a6ae08b
draw
5
4
20.580233
34.07
Both models have similar overall shape but lack the detailed, vibrant internal pattern and realistic lighting effects of the original prompt. The first model has an open circular section that doesn't match the original's enclosed design, while the second model has a more uniform internal pattern rather than the complex, colorful spiral of the prompt.
124417db16e4b1b349178621cc957bdc1983431cb019b44ae7d8515a7f6242f0
draw
4
4
34.990209
11.21
First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has more significant issues with style and details
14f80504c56effdd9bca0a1b6e5227c0083bde89fc874d5c45dc3390cf01e3ce
draw
4
4
25.818512
12.31
First model has similar structure but altered shape and some details; second model has significant shape differences and style changes
16ade48e2ea97d78f97543e81c65f98f0190889163344d82ea6f2341d081561b
draw
4
4
19.313951
14.94
First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and structural differences, with altered frame shape and less accurate stained glass pattern matching
16c601301eb9677e98f04de0478b3d69e1ada51574cfd51d7e86029a3f81936e
draw
4
4
23.135634
16.22
First model has better shape similarity but second has more accurate style matching. Both have minor shape differences and missing small details compared to the prompt.
1855c5592cfc3b8556c9c67a2c216bb7fd83826b8333520818ad774611872f49
draw
6
6
25.901003
60.69
First model has some shape differences and missing small details; second model has major structural and style issues, not matching the prompt's specific design elements
1b000364de44fc77208d95f6d155799f86a0def3cf6fee08a5fd4d985971c07d
draw
5
4
20.709224
21.51
Both models have similar shape but lack the detailed lighting effects, specific headlight design, and the dramatic blue lighting ambiance from the prompt. They also appear to have a more basic rendering style without the high-end visual quality of the prompt.
1c548e3ed10a49f79e5df838136ae2a28b503a0d4c5bb3c71fedba0fb197f087
draw
4
3
30.387506
35.63
Both models have minor shape differences and slight variations in bow placement compared to the prompt, but overall match the general style and structure of a top hat with bow.
1e29dc9e121266792cac3d62f1d6353fac10fea2ad57215d677d86c11f813615
leader
6.5
4
19.852725
21.16
First model has major structural and detail issues (blacked-out areas, incorrect gem shapes), second model has moderate detail differences but closer to prompt style
1f310cbf91cae354910c44c8a3ae402f010f222e8961e3a89fc0e84582128853
draw
3
4
24.976043
27.86
First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details
1fde24c1fa597076c7ac343480ef30010c7306223f229276615c802270b839ed
draw
5
5
28.484426
36.72
Both models have moderate issues with matching the prompt. They have similar overall shape but show variations in details like text labels, bowl reflections, and specific design elements. Some parts appear slightly distorted or simplified compared to the reference image.
203a8159ddbeab2a86a2a819f1b7c2ea24adb90e08ea89db63370eddc92947e3
draw
3
4
26.861779
61.82
First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences
2229cf5f-955c-4bc2-91c3-df9255a1c01d
draw
6
5
22.879533
17.26
Both models have different gemstone shapes (first model has oval, second has square), different prong designs, and the band details differ. They match the general concept of a gold ring with blue gemstone but have significant style and detail differences from the original prompt.
22de4efc4723f624b92889e8c79c9b4fb903e8a6b5907c9f0727ede8f2ccab47
draw
6
6
21.56009
38.58
First model has similar color scheme but different panel shapes and texture details; second model has completely different panel pattern and style, less realistic texture
22f497b84d9d8a3426bac9b7496af80a9c31deb0fda9c10c9e9833dea507ad1c
draw
6
6
22.212065
40.71
First model has moderate issues with book arrangement and object details; second model has major issues with overall structure and object consistency
24553772-96b9-4c11-a880-56d125634a7a
draw
4
4
23.956732
32.56
First model has minor shape differences and missing small architectural details compared to prompt. Second model has more significant style differences and missing structural details.
282c299a1c43900c834d6fac46725fd58812ce8db538df628752eb8452ae0a00
draw
4
4
25.540302
35.75
First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details
2ce24d6b8dd9f244bfd4c0851dd8f03184d93b0dc7bafc22feabb8c8adef523b
draw
4
4
26.380833
44.11
First model has minor shape differences and extra decorative elements; second model has more significant style and detail differences
2ed72b6b9c9b345b17eca522a2584c99018da0f03990817ec082e8babe26291f
draw
4
4
26.009768
12.92
First model has similar general shape but lacks environmental context and some details. Second model has different styling and missing environmental context details.
33532e138e69ddba7c5e762eed4bedb6b3fcd1a55302cd784c823d8d76d705f2
draw
5
5
22.197746
16.78
First model has some shape differences and missing small details compared to prompt, second model has more significant style and detail issues
33827979d7e59540146de3bd1d75e2e1bee4d532e1a61f2426689a0f37baa943
draw
4
4
26.34218
21.12
First model has minor shape differences and lighting variations; second model has more significant style and structural differences
364f2e60a97f04ff4292f98b65e765c5bfbfd61615da2ff56ff9fbad4380f625
ours
4
6
27.885685
35.34
First model has some shape differences and missing texture details; second model has major issues with shape and texture accuracy
37ca201e96add2bac00fa0ee34a36e0643f287da1e46eb336d6df4f42c708610
draw
4
4
25.814582
16.04
First model has better texture matching but handle details differ; second model has simplified texture and handle details, more stylized appearance
38987a28c7b616879a23f7e08ac732df474b9e90684393521f765c04ed0b0fe6
draw
4
3
24.494535
20.18
Both models generally match the prompt but have minor shape differences and lack the detailed texture and background elements of the original image. The handle design and overall form are close but not identical to the prompt's copper pot with its specific patina and surrounding elements.
3a0d4173e8316a33298c124eacbba9b20ca3cfed5f6307ee3bc945ab644ab1e1
draw
4
4
22.460683
16.38
First model has better color matching and umbrella shape similarity, second model has altered pattern and less accurate umbrella structure. Both have minor shape differences and some detail variations.
3aff357f2c9bc317c083c24d896cdc32f43dd78f0831c3a359f67d08771d23de
leader
6
3
24.583703
34.02
First model has black elements and irregular structure; second model has better structure but still has some deviations from the original prompt's clean wooden design
3df9aac28adfa792e385c45498f7464601e572aaeeaf965ecd96e327f26569e2
draw
5
5
21.871346
13.42
Both models have moderate issues. The first model has slightly different color tones and some details on the circular object and figurine don't match the prompt's level of detail. The second model has similar issues with color consistency and detail accuracy compared to the original prompt's ornate, aged appearance.
3e743f77623f822d1f1f0264f823576aa8a20bd7344ba0dce92ef8ac63a82547
draw
5
5
22.914809
57.15
Both models have some issues with the glass ball clarity, tree details, and base texture. The first model has a more transparent glass ball but lacks the detailed tree texture and golden base. The second model has better tree details but still has issues with the glass ball transparency and bow positioning. Both models need improvement in matching the original prompt's clarity, detail, and style.
3f48598320210ac8659a36fd57bccddba1bc5acbab93ac579a0587321088aa84
draw
4
4
25.019864
26.32
First model has minor shape differences and detail variations; second model has more significant issues with missing details and style differences
4024d0d716bab965da116c926ce66d038effa6491958e34b61aa503fdf91ee59
draw
4
4
22.854594
18.84
First model has minor shape differences and missing small decorative details compared to prompt. Second model has more significant issues with style and detail accuracy, with some elements appearing less ornate and having different decorative patterns.
4265649c1aaeccc53febeeba273dd30e98a57271e3db940e0ac5652e3e33bd30
draw
3
3
25.367802
8.34
Both models generally match the prompt but have minor variations in umbrella shape, pattern details, and handle positioning. The umbrella canopy patterns are similar but not identical to the prompt's zebra-like pattern, and there are slight differences in the umbrella's curvature and handle design.
449de7f2e694785e0879713b2b4ce3330941e7bd607d8ff0d67ac5b326aacee8
draw
6
5
21.930802
38.21
Both models have moderate issues with the organ's structure, with some differences in the pipe arrangement, keyboard details, and decorative elements. The overall style is close but not perfect matches to the original prompt's organ.
44ff32bf-1a77-4e7e-b45a-d8778393748a
draw
3
3
20.863863
3.21
Both models have minor issues with detail accuracy and style consistency compared to the prompt. The first model has slightly different handle and guard details, while the second has some variations in the blade and handle textures. Both maintain the general shape and structure but lack the level of detail and lighting quality of the original prompt.
4593ab1c-a4fa-48a7-93c0-f17c57fa2af5
draw
4
3
31.498957
21.37
Both models have minor shape differences from the prompt chair, with slightly different proportions and armrest details. The style is generally similar but not perfect matches.
48fb4b27684ae9b4af97387ad0379a4312538bfee3af6ed3253eecb6a5b93d4f
ours
3
5
22.476792
66.47
First model has minor shape differences and less detailed facets; second model has major issues with overall shape and structure not matching the prompt's gemstone characteristics
4a46caa383a05ffe10f5ce524096cbd8c0c9916fc621f36a9731583d637846c4
draw
5
5
20.781178
29.35
Both models have significant style differences from the prompt. The prompt shows a robot with detailed mechanical joints, specific head design with grid-like face and red square eyes, and a glossy black finish. The generated models have simpler shapes, less detailed joints, and different eye designs (circular vs square). Also, the prompt's robot has a more complex mechanical structure with visible articulation points, which the generated models lack.
4e9106249bc34ce0ebc0429b6329293a3d9177332f7ba2e9cae930727289cac5
draw
3
3
24.453547
24.96
Both models have minor shape differences and some small detail variations compared to the prompt, but overall match the general form and components
4f0bdbaa6affcb59438400cfd2d8be5f661e51f313673e4f44205e15a5c0165a
draw
4
4
21.727525
23.32
First model has minor shape and detail variations; second model has more significant color and texture differences
525fbbdb868e86a55d2cae129d03ba345392e8ffdbe7ba6ca99ff1ecdc3cb984
draw
4
4
28.397271
28.4
First model has better shape similarity but second has more style differences. Both have minor shape variations and some detail differences from the prompt.
55db1e0e8eb100747a50611d1897d3a8fc4d05e8bc6a2bd3586a43cdcb1a8616
draw
4
3
26.396559
11.29
Both models have minor shape differences and some detail variations compared to the prompt, but overall match the general style and pose of the original statue.
5806f9f3a8e69b8336a61f98fc0327e98749e8f50cfc00ac6ea7427e2db5cf8b
ours
4
6
23.734302
31.63
First model has red laser beams matching prompt but has different pose and lighting style; second model lacks lasers and has different proportions/features
582b5fa7c5b21b3baf09bf58599e7b4082d21874be3afb3beb6a936a26cc0ffc
draw
6
6
27.793493
12.58
First model has some shape differences and missing small details like texture patterns and eye details. Second model has major issues with overall shape and category (appears more like a frog than a gecko).
5a5fbe25dd2291f41fcd4a1e2a2f066cf7d7475edcc602650ecff4bfadbc8028
draw
5
5
23.256819
20.73
First model has similar colors but different shape and texture details; second model has different structure and missing specific details from prompt
5aa3a22ae7830606ad5038ea1c7273995d7cd534f883b98fd3402e526ab79391
ours
3
5
23.273268
28.58
First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues, with altered hat shape and feather arrangement
5eaf242b81d934958f083ecc80e5eb718e47760646755c0180e640b1401f14f8
draw
4
5
22.879639
34.04
First model has minor shape and detail differences; second model has more significant style and detail deviations
69847a5d5949d8ce2877b864e7b9ad32ffc7e90b546414d5b79572f0a6669cad
draw
4
4
24.036931
34.41
First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail differences, with altered color tones and less precise shape matching
6b042c50676b622a978dca8a732a26f8d56a35c8fbf74a4d4a4fcaa7afd886dc
draw
5
5
23.374368
23.74
Both models have significant text errors, altered font styles, and missing/incorrect details compared to the prompt. The leather texture and overall book structure are somewhat similar but with major text and style discrepancies.
6e1fa873a0f08a0e1079b858ed64cc40c9dee2c96833edb07fb1522a976dd2e6
draw
3
3
25.3129
23.1
Both models have minor shape differences and some detail variations compared to the prompt, but overall match the general form of the teapot with the long spout, rounded body, and lid with knob.
70010d16816f40ee956f3e2c396e03fadb5f4982d6c9356f35573d068de44611
draw
4
5
24.306845
45.21
First model has similar color scheme but slightly distorted shape; second model has muted colors and less detail matching original yarn texture
7171ad88e62858e96cbcd9f6cf1cad5c89f1bfb818f5d208ceacd24e489adb34
draw
5
5
28.44076
12.98
Both models have moderate issues. They lack the detailed texture and realistic appearance of the original pearl necklace. The first model has incorrect shape proportions and simplified details, while the second model has a more abstract form with less realistic pearl rendering. Both fail to capture the detailed texture, lighting, and arrangement of the original image.
71bc1ac0c0eb9bd1be4a7150a602ad7727947ed1c5248aba711d47690ea14e3a
draw
5
5
27.255034
75.6
Both models have significant issues with detail accuracy, material representation, and overall visual quality compared to the prompt. They lack the intricate gemstone detailing, precise ornamental patterns, and realistic lighting of the reference image. The first model has incorrect gem placement and texture, while the second has altered structural details and missing decorative elements.
7811aa32454d6f1cf9ef5ff2a6958d94140e20c33c2fae079debfd26809c3539
leader
5
3
22.786923
15.23
First model has label details not in prompt, second model has simpler style but closer shape
78eef3555870d070d454d48893f45d9d1d932da566a4c0bfb4701037d761eaed
draw
3
3
23.402986
9.37
Both models have similar overall shape but show minor differences in detail, texture, and specific design elements compared to the prompt image. Some small details like paneling, lighting effects, and specific markings differ slightly.
7976c38065b686a9d704de5b957e2acddf12c6a77979713f245262354ae776f2
draw
4
3
32.962997
75.09
Both models have minor shape differences and slightly different detail arrangements compared to the prompt, but overall match the general pine cone concept
79dba7120244f263228580c4069f51578a30f97304cc2f93c7b7c0666e9eb6b6
draw
4
4
26.102813
35.09
First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues
7c7df949fd112c9a3b33311bcfa387160927231a5aa41cb3a0064618d1abe87e
draw
5
5
26.391968
61.01
First model has minor differences in book arrangement and shelf details; second model has more significant style and detail differences, with altered shelf angles and book types
854c1449-39a1-4846-8af4-d6ebe8d4f619
draw
4
4
29.055017
26.81
First model has some shape differences and missing small details; second model has more significant issues with style and details
8916afced891fe7c446c3e06d522c9ddff2605fffff84b578ba0dea1f4495730
leader
5
3
28.650657
22.21
First model has different structural design with more angular elements and different base structure. Second model has closer structural similarity but still has some differences in the clip mechanism and overall form.
89e1b8998cc50f9be2f55127b09effa9030e523bec6d65b72f74d4c4db06099b
draw
4
4
24.920797
28.91
First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more noticeable style and detail differences
8a08215ae9ee2976fbddabdca5bc5046c9c8b9dc5829a336cf3bcba249fc00f5
draw
5
4
22.600055
22.18
Both models have moderate issues with style and detail matching the original prompt. They lack the detailed texture, specific horn shapes, and facial features of the original image. Some proportions and structural details are also inconsistent.
8dbd97f96c4d02a66fac4a71ae0d6377459b3400dca489574454a5bbecb57154
draw
4
4
24.117862
25.48
First model has minor shape differences and slight detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues, with less accurate representation of the original's texture and decoration placement
92036f3abc8c73b3d2185d7afec12ab838bf0d50910b31c0c1d4f4114442d004
ours
4
6
21.291558
39.95
First model has some shape differences and missing environmental details; second model has major architectural style deviations and missing environmental elements
92b6f4511409351316f198024d3b849b9d86d469a6549722e70e0c0cee504916
draw
4
4
22.809833
27.05
First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style differences and missing details compared to the prompt
9878bf40b07cfc675cc42f91cfd4d911c3856c8e2258e19f7c0f7536320c0b64
draw
6
5
23.378206
34.48
Both models have moderate issues with book arrangement, detail accuracy, and overall style matching the prompt. The first model has more color variation in books and decorative elements, while the second has simpler book designs. Both lack the specific aged wood texture and detailed ornamentation of the original prompt.
988209beaf8802e7b01184b774fdbbc2b17bcac96dd102343e6bad1527504ee9
draw
3
3
21.880247
15.72
Both models generally match the prompt but have minor differences in basket texture, flower arrangement, and hanging rope details. Some models have slightly different basket styles and flower positioning compared to the reference image.
9892e6f5c8dc0ccb7b453f21860dc2be3f7be0157c5add3c1943c65e1b278f44
leader
5
3
21.049639
33.03
First model has different head shape, lighting, and detail quality; second model is closer but still has some shape and detail differences
9923a943b8a628ee3a16ca4111f5010e876e90b4f491e2cbd8a036f0bd4cb750
draw
3
3
22.460721
6.98
Slight shape differences and minor detail variations between models and prompt
99b7192fd902db75f393fda95ce3f811278636a6df92f6c691dc819890771116
draw
4
4
23.359962
26.41
First model has minor shape differences and missing small details compared to prompt. Second model has more significant issues with structure and style, with major deviations from the original object's form.
9b22fb789fbc3d9e7cd50e4cc21300bcfac60930735d4653d97dfd6d9316ef84
draw
4
4
19.399527
13.43
First model has minor shape differences and some headstock irregularities; second model has more significant detail issues and style variations
9c515261c35590822a4ff6f1fe5781aa55da3453bb8be5904aa2f0b1bf0fd0a8
draw
5
4
20.527194
25.52
Both models have some shape differences and style variations from the original prompt. The first model has different color tones and some structural details that don't match perfectly. The second model has similar color scheme but also has noticeable differences in shape and detail precision compared to the original prompt.
9c6df3b2c14e9a312d3236417e1aea3aab531b70c487edfd1eeeee2fabbc79d2
draw
6
6
27.851769
45.16
First model has extra furniture pieces (small sofa/chair), second model has different shape proportions and missing some original details like drawer design and cushion arrangement
9dbc68f175b56e60ae95f9511fb94546bbf4b49c0f5b7e5bf5b607cb38b19bc1
draw
6
6
22.410293
8.02
First model has some shape differences and material inconsistencies; second model has major structural and material deviations from the prompt
a4d44ab3b65677ae3e2194f4d9fe32a7d76ae039d5fc6fb684dd78a2fbf0adf9
draw
4
4
26.951502
31.67
First model has minor shape differences and lighting variations; second model has more significant style differences and less accurate details matching the original prompt
a60c5b2c3dafb223d0ecbd408995e8bb346960822148f78b30c106b1375e1ad6
draw
5
5
23.069439
22.65
First model has better color matching but lacks background detail; second model has simplified structure and less detail, both have incorrect background and simplified elements compared to prompt
a77062a2d0222debdbd68d33e96865cda4df9ac6a18d9f0a507033a9c79002e0
draw
4
4
23.919957
20.33
First model has minor shape differences and detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues
aacb989d16471a364824ac145d8b06fa273e3a8ac0af3ed6ea78e1656777d830
draw
4
4
22.980191
26.65
First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details
ab455629abc3223b6b448253da59120dccdceccf123354ceadd5a904e2bed8d3
draw
4
4
22.91497
48.11
First model has closer resemblance to prompt but has minor shape differences in drapery and facial features. Second model has more significant deviations in facial structure, hair texture, and overall proportions, with less accurate representation of the prompt's details.
ab506d408112974e5ba8f2a6dcae249e7c2674b6e60f0dff4053a9ddc28fbd33
draw
4
3
20.47397
22.49
Both models have similar shape but some variations in flower patterns, colors, and details. Minor issues with flower arrangement and detail consistency.
accbba278390739a94975fe2a61c53e7b30e6fa17cb8e8b9bb7bc572a5fb8d44
draw
6
6
28.168636
44.64
First model has some shape differences and missing details compared to prompt; second model has major issues with overall structure and added circular element not in prompt
acd3d46a7d9b6cfbc7337bbfc6a785524933994f198df4d4c6211721d33846c6
draw
4
3
29.088311
13.74
Both models have minor shape differences and some details don't match the prompt exactly, but overall structure and basic features are similar
aebc379c6b12425cd01b6ddd3f6adc644c2ad09b27300f48f2d9f7d1ccb65f8a
draw
6
5
25.66539
10.81
Both models have significant issues with the candelabra structure, candle colors, and overall style. The original prompt shows a detailed golden candelabra with blue candles, while the generated models have different candle counts, colors, and less detailed golden structures. Both models have moderate deviations from the prompt.
afd25f32172975ac089bf170a52a6fea54fd6270042ad3c392fcd5d16dd1da1d
draw
4
4
21.38949
20.63
First model has minor shape differences and detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues compared to the original prompt.
b110ed3a3548f903076d10ed37efd1117e153cb0248215db63c8c27eb31f0144
draw
5
5
20.26606
21.79
Both models have similar color schemes but differ in patch patterns, shape details, and basket design. They match the general concept but have moderate deviations from the original prompt's specific visual details.
b57421b571110de4bc492bce2481407f7740fc4242178a232f0dc34246bc1df4
draw
4
4
24.202019
15.48
First model has better color matching and puzzle piece details, second has simpler style with less detail. Both have general shape similarity but differ in texture and detail complexity.
b8a0a728fa4a2f2b7160fa0f5a8df2dbb0d53b338010ce310d1d3e1625d1de92
leader
5
3
23.790267
10.79
First model has minor shape differences and missing lighting details; second model has closer match but still lacks some lighting effects from prompt
ba495014c7920c09602f1ecc0c75c051f005dcb6a8bbf132d07ede2ee43b9e32
draw
4
4
23.268138
38.37
First model has minor shape differences and missing small details compared to prompt; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details missing
bce2d1db387cfd5acf13509c542fe3cd722b31a11980419487b502f830cd4a44
draw
4
5
25.381661
66.46
First model has minor shape differences and some detail variations; second model has more significant style and detail issues, with altered box structure and bird position
bde166eae9a467e70699be378dfd90814e7fa9637899667631fd2729fb7bdf47
draw
3
4
25.014104
6.19
First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details
be94887e8e032e46d4bbd2f2024382c94b103450d42bf7b9ce9eb28198be507c
draw
3
4
22.727013
17.88
First model has minor shape differences and missing small details; second model has moderate issues with style and significant details
c1abfbc5fb9bc7f6d31a03986d730328e1757e24a12f27824fc77ef17ff51578
draw
5
5
26.888192
76.76
Both models have moderate issues. The first model has simplified crystal shapes and less detailed textures, while the second has different crystal arrangements and less accurate color matching. Both lack the detailed, realistic crystal textures and lighting quality of the prompt image.
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
YAML Metadata Warning: empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card (https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/datasets-cards)

Benchmark Results: v2.2.7

Overview

  • Round: 14
  • Test Name: v2.2.7
  • Timestamp: 2026-01-16 16:39:22

Summary

Metric Value
Total Tasks 128
Total Judged 128
Skipped 0
Gen Failed 0
Render Failed 0
Judge Failed 0

Results

Result Count
🏆 WINS 7
🤝 DRAWS 115
❌ LOSSES 6

Performance

Metric Value
Win Rate 5.5%
Margin +0.8%
Avg Gen Time 24.27s

Methodology

  • Judge Model: thudm/glm-4.1v-9b-thinking (via OpenRouter)
  • Position-Balanced: 2 passes with swapped order to avoid position bias
  • Penalty Scale: 0 (perfect) to 10 (completely wrong)
  • Winner: Lower average penalty wins (draw if difference ≤ 1)

Files

  • benchmark_v2.2.7.json - Full benchmark results
  • */ours.png - Our rendered 3D models
  • */leader.png - Leader's rendered 3D models
  • */origin.png - Original prompt images
Downloads last month
16