SurveyReview
A Reviewer-Aligned Benchmark for Survey Evaluators
SurveyReview is a reviewer-aligned benchmark for evaluating survey papers. It converts real peer-review reports into multidimensional evaluation labels and rationales, allowing models to be tested against how human reviewers judge survey quality.
This directory is the v1.1 release. It keeps the original SurveyReview evaluation metrics while using cleaned article texts and XML-like rationale prompts.
The benchmark focuses on four survey-review dimensions: Readability, Criticalness, Comprehensiveness, and Structure. It provides standardized train/test splits, article metadata, prompt files, and an API-based evaluation pipeline.
Quick Start
Create an environment and install dependencies:
python -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
Configure the API client:
cp .env.example .env
Then edit .env:
API_KEY=your-api-key-here
BASE_URL=https://api.openai.com/v1
MODEL_NAME=gpt-5.2
JUDGE_MODEL=gpt-5.2
EVALUATE_REASONS=True
Run the default test-set evaluation:
python src/api_base_evaluate.py
The v1.1 evaluator defaults to:
data/v1.1-paper
Run on the train split:
EVAL_SPLIT=train python src/api_base_evaluate.py
Outputs are written to result/<timestamp>/:
| File | Description |
|---|---|
results.csv |
MSE, MAE, accuracy, and sample counts for each dimension. |
predictions_<dimension>.jsonl |
Per-sample prediction records. |
run_config.json |
Runtime configuration and split statistics. |
rqs_<dimension>.json |
Rationale quality results when EVALUATE_REASONS=True. |
Leaderboard
Lower MSE/MAE is better. Higher HAS/RQS is better.
| Rank | Model | HAS | Read. | Crit. | Comp. | Stru. | Average | RQS | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSE | MAE | MSE | MAE | MSE | MAE | MSE | MAE | MSE | MAE | ||||
| 1 | SurveyReviewer | 0.74 | 1.43 | 0.72 | 1.52 | 0.82 | 1.26 | 0.56 | 1.29 | 0.65 | 1.38 | 0.69 | 0.36 |
| 2 | GPT-5.2 | 0.68 | 2.13 | 1.07 | 1.97 | 0.97 | 2.04 | 1.08 | 2.98 | 1.47 | 2.28 | 1.15 | 0.42 |
| 3 | Claude-Opus-4.5 | 0.68 | 2.91 | 1.29 | 1.88 | 0.88 | 2.66 | 1.23 | 3.65 | 1.58 | 2.77 | 1.25 | 0.48 |
| 4 | Qwen3-32B | 0.61 | 3.05 | 1.45 | 3.24 | 1.51 | 3.22 | 1.54 | 3.35 | 1.53 | 3.21 | 1.51 | 0.36 |
| 5 | GLM-4.7 | 0.60 | 3.43 | 1.50 | 2.58 | 1.21 | 3.66 | 1.57 | 4.83 | 1.95 | 3.62 | 1.56 | 0.37 |
| 6 | gemini-3-pro | 0.58 | 3.84 | 1.52 | 2.25 | 1.00 | 3.91 | 1.49 | 5.76 | 2.11 | 3.94 | 1.53 | 0.29 |
| 7 | DeepSeek-v3.2 | 0.58 | 4.78 | 1.88 | 2.49 | 1.15 | 4.59 | 1.82 | 4.02 | 1.76 | 3.97 | 1.65 | 0.37 |
Notes
articles/is split into multiple JSON shards to stay within GitHub file-size limits.v1.1-paperuses cleaned article texts and prompts that output<reason>...</reason> <score>X</score>.- If you only want to verify the pipeline, set
EVALUATE_REASONS=Falseto skip the judge-model stage.