ZeroBench-TTS / README.md
minhanh29's picture
Upload folder using huggingface_hub
2dfc967 verified
|
Raw
History Blame
7.66 kB
---
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
task_categories:
- text-to-speech
language:
- vi
pretty_name: ZeroBench-TTS
size_categories:
- n<1K
tags:
- tts
- zero-shot
- voice-cloning
- code-switching
- cross-lingual
- vietnamese
configs:
- config_name: challenging
data_files:
- split: test
path: data/challenging.parquet
- config_name: code_switch
data_files:
- split: test
path: data/code_switch.parquet
- config_name: cross_lingual
data_files:
- split: test
path: data/cross_lingual.parquet
- config_name: vietnamese
data_files:
- split: test
path: data/vietnamese.parquet
---
# ZeroBench-TTS
From [ZeroWeight AI](https://huggingface.co/zeroweight-ai) — the benchmark
counterpart to ZeroTTS. A small, fully specified benchmark
for **zero-shot Vietnamese TTS / voice cloning**: 39 held-out
Vietnamese reference voices × 3 subsets
(`vietnamese`, `code_switch`, `challenging`), plus 20 non-Vietnamese
reference voices × 1 `cross_lingual` subset = **137 test items**. Every
item pairs one reference clip (with its ground-truth transcript) with one
**Vietnamese** target sentence to synthesize — `cross_lingual` tests whether a
system can speak Vietnamese given a foreign-language voice prompt, which is
the direction that matters for a Vietnamese TTS system (not the reverse).
It is deliberately small enough to run every checkpoint on, and every item is
scored the same way — WER, SSIM, UTMOS — so numbers are comparable across
systems.
## Subsets
| config | n | language of `text` | what it stresses |
|---|---|---|---|
| `challenging` | 39 | `vi` | repeated words, acronyms (ChatGPT, ASEAN, WHO), times, dates, percentages, dense punctuation |
| `code_switch` | 39 | `vi` | natural Vietnamese with embedded English (names, brands, workplace loanwords) |
| `cross_lingual` | 20 | `vi` | non-Vietnamese reference voice (Emilia: zh/de/fr/ja/ko) reading Vietnamese text — many languages -> Vietnamese zero-shot cloning |
| `vietnamese` | 39 | `vi` | monolingual Vietnamese — the baseline case |
Within every subset the target sentences are split evenly into **short /
medium / long** thirds (`length_bucket`), so length is covered across the board
rather than confounded with subset. `cross_lingual`'s target texts are drawn
from the other three subsets' pools (mixed, not a pool of its own) — see
`text_origin_subset`.
## Fields
| field | type | description |
|---|---|---|
| `id` | string | `{subset}/{voice_id}` |
| `subset` | string | one of the configs above |
| `text` | string | **the text to synthesize**, verbatim — always Vietnamese |
| `text_normalized` | string | spoken-out form of `text` (equal to `text` when nothing needs expanding) |
| `has_normalization` | bool | whether `text_normalized` actually differs |
| `lang` | string | target language of `text` (always `vi`) |
| `text_origin_subset` | string | which pool `text` came from (`vietnamese`/`code_switch`/`challenging`) — trivially equal to `subset` except for `cross_lingual` rows |
| `length_bucket` | string | `short` / `medium` / `long` |
| `n_chars`, `n_words` | int | length of `text` |
| `ref_audio` | audio | **reference voice** to clone, mono 24000 Hz |
| `ref_text` | string | ground-truth transcript of `ref_audio`, in `voice_lang` — for systems that need an in-context audio+text prompt. Speaker-encoder models can ignore it. |
| `ref_duration` | float | seconds of `ref_audio` |
| `voice_id` | string | stable voice identifier; the same voice appears once per subset |
| `voice_source` | string | `vivos` / `viVoice` / `phoaudiobook` / `emilia` |
| `source_speaker`, `source_utterance` | string | provenance in the source corpus |
| `voice_lang` | string | language of the reference speaker (`vi` for the first three subsets; `zh`/`de`/`fr`/`ja`/`ko` for `cross_lingual`) |
| `cross_lingual` | bool | `lang != voice_lang` — always `False` except for the `cross_lingual` subset |
## Usage
```python
import io, soundfile as sf
from datasets import load_dataset, Audio
ds = load_dataset("zeroweight-ai/ZeroBench-TTS", "challenging", split="test")
# Reading the raw wav bytes works on every `datasets` version; asking for a
# decoded array needs a codec backend (`pip install torchcodec`) on datasets>=5.
ds = ds.cast_column("ref_audio", Audio(decode=False))
row = ds[0]
wav, sr = sf.read(io.BytesIO(row["ref_audio"]["bytes"]))
audio = my_tts(text=row["text"], reference=(wav, sr)) # clone and speak
```
## Metrics
The reference implementation is `scripts/eval_tts.py` in the ZeroTTS repo.
* **WER** — [`vinai/PhoWhisper-large`](https://huggingface.co/vinai/PhoWhisper-large)
(a Vietnamese-specialized Whisper finetune — NOT raw `openai/whisper-large-v3`)
transcribes the generated audio; WER is computed against the target text
after lowercasing, punctuation stripping and whitespace collapsing.
`scripts/eval_tts.py --whisper_model` can swap in any other Whisper-family
checkpoint if you want a different ASR.
* **SSIM** — cosine similarity between `microsoft/wavlm-base-plus-sv` x-vectors
of the generated clip and `ref_audio`.
* **UTMOS** — UTMOSv2 predicted naturalness MOS of the generated clip.
* **Excess silence** — seconds of unwanted lead-in/tail/mid-utterance pause,
specifically to catch weird long silences (stalls, dead air, a stuck
decoder) that WER/SSIM/UTMOS don't penalize on their own — none of the three
metrics above notice a generation that's otherwise correct but padded with
several extra seconds of dead air.
**Scoring the `challenging` subset:** take
`min(WER(hyp, text), WER(hyp, text_normalized))`. Whisper may transcribe
`3,2%` either as digits or as *ba phẩy hai phần trăm*, and that choice belongs
to the ASR, not to the TTS system under test — scoring against a single form
would measure Whisper's formatting policy instead of intelligibility.
## Voice selection
* **VIVOS** — every speaker of the VIVOS *test* split (`VIVOSDEV01``VIVOSDEV19`),
one clip each, chosen closest to 6 s.
* **viVoice / phoaudiobook** — 10 speakers each. These corpora carry
no usable speaker labels, so clips were selected geometrically: **k-means over
WeSpeaker x-vectors, keeping each cluster's medoid**. That yields mutually
distinct voices spread over the corpus's voice space, while medoids stay
typical of their region rather than being recording outliers.
`source_speaker` is therefore a synthetic cluster id, not an upstream label.
All Vietnamese reference clips are 4–12 s, mono, 24000 Hz.
* **Emilia (`cross_lingual` only)** — 4 speakers each from
5 non-Vietnamese languages (de, fr, ja, ko, zh), sampled from the
gated [amphion/Emilia-Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/amphion/Emilia-Dataset).
Candidates are filtered by duration, DNSMOS quality, and a per-language text
sanity check (script range for zh/ja/ko, function-word check for de/fr) —
Emilia's own per-clip language tag is not fully reliable (English text was
found mislabeled `ko` in the first Korean shard during a spot check).
## Provenance & license
Vietnamese reference audio is redistributed from
[AILAB-VNUHCM/vivos](https://huggingface.co/datasets/AILAB-VNUHCM/vivos),
[capleaf/viVoice](https://huggingface.co/datasets/capleaf/viVoice) and
[thivux/phoaudiobook](https://huggingface.co/datasets/thivux/phoaudiobook).
`cross_lingual` reference audio is redistributed from
[amphion/Emilia-Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/amphion/Emilia-Dataset).
Please honour each upstream corpus's own license and cite them alongside this
benchmark. The target sentences are original, written for this benchmark.
Released for research and evaluation use.