Datasets:
The full dataset viewer is not available (click to read why). Only showing a preview of the rows.
Error code: DatasetGenerationError
Exception: CastError
Message: Couldn't cast
question: string
answer: string
analysis: string
rung: int64
inter_id: string
current_condition: string
future_condition: struct<ETWT: string, NTST: string, ELWL: string, NLSL: string>
child 0, ETWT: string
child 1, NTST: string
child 2, ELWL: string
child 3, NLSL: string
_ustbench_source_repo: string
_ustbench_source_file: string
_ustbench_source_task: string
_ustbench_subset: string
_ustbench_original_index: int64
_ustbench_sampling_cell: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
_ustbench_sampling_fraction: double
_ustbench_sampling_seed: int64
feedbacks: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
environment_feedback: null
region_data: string
options: string
query_service: string
area: double
stage: string
question_type: string
target: string
analysis_text: string
to
{'question': Value('string'), 'answer': Value('string'), 'target': Value('string'), 'analysis_text': Value('string'), 'feedbacks': List(Json(decode=True)), '_ustbench_source_repo': Value('string'), '_ustbench_source_file': Value('string'), '_ustbench_source_task': Value('string'), '_ustbench_subset': Value('string'), '_ustbench_original_index': Value('int64'), '_ustbench_sampling_cell': List(Value('string')), '_ustbench_sampling_fraction': Value('float64'), '_ustbench_sampling_seed': Value('int64'), 'current_condition': Json(decode=True), 'environment_feedback': Json(decode=True), 'future_condition': {'ETWT': Json(decode=True), 'NTST': Json(decode=True), 'ELWL': Json(decode=True), 'NLSL': Json(decode=True)}, 'stage': Value('string'), 'question_type': Value('string'), 'analysis': Value('string'), 'rung': Value('int64'), 'inter_id': Value('string')}
because column names don't match
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1816, in _prepare_split_single
for key, table in generator:
^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 310, in _generate_tables
self._cast_table(pa_table, json_field_paths=json_field_paths),
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py", line 130, in _cast_table
pa_table = table_cast(pa_table, self.info.features.arrow_schema)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2369, in table_cast
return cast_table_to_schema(table, schema)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2297, in cast_table_to_schema
raise CastError(
datasets.table.CastError: Couldn't cast
question: string
answer: string
analysis: string
rung: int64
inter_id: string
current_condition: string
future_condition: struct<ETWT: string, NTST: string, ELWL: string, NLSL: string>
child 0, ETWT: string
child 1, NTST: string
child 2, ELWL: string
child 3, NLSL: string
_ustbench_source_repo: string
_ustbench_source_file: string
_ustbench_source_task: string
_ustbench_subset: string
_ustbench_original_index: int64
_ustbench_sampling_cell: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
_ustbench_sampling_fraction: double
_ustbench_sampling_seed: int64
feedbacks: list<item: string>
child 0, item: string
environment_feedback: null
region_data: string
options: string
query_service: string
area: double
stage: string
question_type: string
target: string
analysis_text: string
to
{'question': Value('string'), 'answer': Value('string'), 'target': Value('string'), 'analysis_text': Value('string'), 'feedbacks': List(Json(decode=True)), '_ustbench_source_repo': Value('string'), '_ustbench_source_file': Value('string'), '_ustbench_source_task': Value('string'), '_ustbench_subset': Value('string'), '_ustbench_original_index': Value('int64'), '_ustbench_sampling_cell': List(Value('string')), '_ustbench_sampling_fraction': Value('float64'), '_ustbench_sampling_seed': Value('int64'), 'current_condition': Json(decode=True), 'environment_feedback': Json(decode=True), 'future_condition': {'ETWT': Json(decode=True), 'NTST': Json(decode=True), 'ELWL': Json(decode=True), 'NLSL': Json(decode=True)}, 'stage': Value('string'), 'question_type': Value('string'), 'analysis': Value('string'), 'rung': Value('int64'), 'inter_id': Value('string')}
because column names don't match
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 1348, in compute_config_parquet_and_info_response
parquet_operations = convert_to_parquet(builder)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 980, in convert_to_parquet
builder.download_and_prepare(
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 890, in download_and_prepare
self._download_and_prepare(
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 951, in _download_and_prepare
self._prepare_split(split_generator, **prepare_split_kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1683, in _prepare_split
for job_id, done, content in self._prepare_split_single(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1869, in _prepare_split_single
raise DatasetGenerationError("An error occurred while generating the dataset") from e
datasets.exceptions.DatasetGenerationError: An error occurred while generating the datasetNeed help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
question string | answer string | target string | analysis_text string | feedbacks list | _ustbench_source_repo string | _ustbench_source_file string | _ustbench_source_task string | _ustbench_subset string | _ustbench_original_index int64 | _ustbench_sampling_cell list | _ustbench_sampling_fraction float64 | _ustbench_sampling_seed int64 | current_condition unknown | environment_feedback unknown | future_condition dict | stage string | question_type string | analysis string | rung int64 | inter_id string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | D | reducing overall charging time | - Coverage ranking:
location 2 (3.023) > location 1 (3.018) > location 3 (3.017) > location 4 (3.014)
- Demand ranking:
location 1 (185156.95) > location 4 (140996.46) > location 3 (125590.99) > location 2 (30408.15)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (355.51m) > location 3 (190.59m) > location 4 (189.67m) > location 1 (... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.3753837474,
"travel_gain": -0.4155793269,
"wait_gain": -0.7545476633,
"chg_gain": -0.1472516149
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.3788307126000001,
"travel_gain": -0.4109663744,
"wait_gain": -0.7573584759,
"chg_gain": -0.14462945870000002
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.3740707987,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 5 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | D | reducing overall charging time | - Coverage ranking:
location 4 (2.804) > location 3 (2.804) > location 2 (2.799) > location 1 (2.798)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (191164.73) > location 2 (105482.68) > location 4 (101737.98) > location 1 (31791.00)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (350.27m) > location 2 (280.65m) > location 3 (224.91m) > location 4 (... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.2019548958,
"travel_gain": -0.44463797050000003,
"wait_gain": -0.3404854932,
"chg_gain": -0.0165298499
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.2026977088,
"travel_gain": -0.45803252980000003,
"wait_gain": -0.3400713529,
"chg_gain": -0.0157504875
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.2067440464,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 10 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | A | enhancing overall station coverage | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.723) > location 3 (3.722) > location 4 (3.720) > location 2 (3.718)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (55234.40) > location 4 (23626.61) > location 1 (14592.99) > location 2 (10324.44)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (244.25m) > location 2 (224.67m) > location 3 (149.38m) > location 4 (139... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.929974869,
"travel_gain": -0.5853564720000001,
"wait_gain": -0.7836826479,
"chg_gain": -0.0039152263000000005
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.9257436441,
"travel_gain": -0.5658874698,
"wait_gain": -0.7860713136,
"chg_gain": -0.005226231400000001
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.9291... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 23 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (2.761) > location 3 (2.760) > location 4 (2.758) > location 2 (2.752)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (152611.62) > location 1 (78393.52) > location 4 (68746.53) > location 2 (5124.22)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (493.19m) > location 4 (257.81m) > location 1 (219.96m) > location 3 (190... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.1728589345,
"travel_gain": -0.4332754216,
"wait_gain": -0.34057874920000003,
"chg_gain": -0.0150254841
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.165502637,
"travel_gain": -0.3843759948,
"wait_gain": -0.34280438280000003,
"chg_gain": -0.0340550321
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.171882908,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 50 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | D | reducing overall charging time | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (2.989) > location 3 (2.989) > location 4 (2.987) > location 2 (2.982)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (93622.96) > location 2 (77555.40) > location 3 (54240.41) > location 1 (10076.67)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (469.49m) > location 3 (331.33m) > location 4 (198.58m) > location 2 (180... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.3525687158,
"travel_gain": -0.44185653810000003,
"wait_gain": -0.3609749391,
"chg_gain": -0.022349967800000002
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.3466331394,
"travel_gain": -0.4599271043,
"wait_gain": -0.36099709890000004,
"chg_gain": -0.0210258476
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.3521... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 75 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | D | reducing overall charging time | - Coverage ranking:
location 4 (3.300) > location 3 (3.299) > location 1 (3.298) > location 2 (3.297)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (151192.85) > location 4 (83599.35) > location 1 (21677.14) > location 2 (21488.57)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (274.43m) > location 1 (248.55m) > location 4 (184.11m) > location 3 (14... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.5953591879,
"travel_gain": -0.4958233446,
"wait_gain": -0.3416449549,
"chg_gain": 0.0796337059
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.5949866719,
"travel_gain": -0.5143986046,
"wait_gain": -0.3255891493,
"chg_gain": 0.090847968
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.5960484702,
"travel_gain"... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 87 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | D | reducing overall charging time | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (2.590) > location 4 (2.588) > location 3 (2.582) > location 2 (2.581)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (108105.96) > location 3 (53134.37) > location 2 (24501.37) > location 1 (14472.77)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (348.67m) > location 3 (270.48m) > location 4 (221.27m) > location 2 (18... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.0383697347,
"travel_gain": -0.4129639024,
"wait_gain": -0.3059998205,
"chg_gain": -0.0115406684
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.0314016161,
"travel_gain": -0.4225341577,
"wait_gain": -0.3055270046,
"chg_gain": -0.0049859653
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.0318833447,
"travel_ga... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 91 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 3 (2.359) > location 4 (2.357) > location 1 (2.357) > location 2 (2.348)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (119591.06) > location 1 (78849.81) > location 3 (52221.19) > location 2 (8518.45)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (761.97m) > location 3 (240.75m) > location 4 (222.64m) > location 1 (213... | [
{
"cov_gain": 0.8546185215000001,
"travel_gain": -0.3609358223,
"wait_gain": -0.2240602287,
"chg_gain": 0.0110343795
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.8477217925,
"travel_gain": -0.2926273444,
"wait_gain": -0.22661125780000002,
"chg_gain": -0.006357053200000001
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.856105... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 106 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | D | reducing overall charging time | - Coverage ranking:
location 4 (3.387) > location 1 (3.386) > location 3 (3.385) > location 2 (3.385)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (158100.58) > location 2 (137679.25) > location 1 (19965.61) > location 3 (6297.97)
- Distance ranking:
location 3 (570.95m) > location 1 (148.22m) > location 2 (131.86m) > location 4 (13... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.664377008,
"travel_gain": -0.5324158866,
"wait_gain": -0.8767350748,
"chg_gain": -0.0660755417
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.6636880903,
"travel_gain": -0.5581135863000001,
"wait_gain": -0.7540361106,
"chg_gain": -0.026104086000000002
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.6637406727,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 114 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | C | reducing overall waiting time | - Coverage ranking:
location 4 (2.163) > location 2 (2.146) > location 1 (2.141) > location 3 (2.135)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (136611.06) > location 1 (102821.57) > location 4 (43231.98) > location 2 (42990.56)
- Distance ranking:
location 4 (541.48m) > location 2 (517.58m) > location 1 (296.56m) > location 3 (2... | [
{
"cov_gain": 0.6847236372000001,
"travel_gain": -0.2305019533,
"wait_gain": -0.4406961035,
"chg_gain": -0.0640033325
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.6886752847000001,
"travel_gain": -0.18064250110000002,
"wait_gain": -0.4487929906,
"chg_gain": -0.0788583478
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.6805326... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 135 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | A | enhancing overall station coverage | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.574) > location 2 (3.572) > location 3 (3.571) > location 4 (3.570)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (159552.56) > location 2 (19087.21) > location 4 (15844.11) > location 1 (9333.92)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (409.04m) > location 2 (180.73m) > location 3 (137.05m) > location 4 (133... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.8125553375,
"travel_gain": -0.5507854144000001,
"wait_gain": -0.6764774484,
"chg_gain": 0.033644605200000004
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.8112659350000002,
"travel_gain": -0.5676748235,
"wait_gain": -0.6678523338,
"chg_gain": 0.0327800756
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.81023972... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 140 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 3 (1.892) > location 1 (1.885) > location 2 (1.881) > location 4 (1.863)
- Demand ranking:
location 1 (367359.91) > location 3 (203777.44) > location 4 (82111.71) > location 2 (28996.25)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (1627.26m) > location 1 (371.19m) > location 3 (334.01m) > location 4 (... | [
{
"cov_gain": 0.4832810374,
"travel_gain": 0.0476704316,
"wait_gain": -0.16967581950000002,
"chg_gain": -0.0749225387
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.4802516529,
"travel_gain": 0.1318142064,
"wait_gain": -0.160509333,
"chg_gain": -0.058780401100000004
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.48896871150000... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 143 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (1.822) > location 2 (1.806) > location 3 (1.796) > location 4 (1.795)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (223145.61) > location 1 (129827.08) > location 2 (28996.25) > location 4 (0.00)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (1627.26m) > location 3 (482.87m) > location 4 (345.78m) > location 1 (308.... | [
{
"cov_gain": 0.4340101872,
"travel_gain": 0.0017596697,
"wait_gain": 0.0912448931,
"chg_gain": 0.0589991428
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.4212136334,
"travel_gain": 0.1350665844,
"wait_gain": 0.0000868009,
"chg_gain": -0.0057773593
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.4130314821,
"travel_gain": ... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 146 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 4 (3.721) > location 3 (3.720) > location 1 (3.719) > location 2 (3.717)
- Demand ranking:
location 1 (131555.09) > location 3 (50935.93) > location 4 (31890.34) > location 2 (3551.59)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (399.34m) > location 4 (182.19m) > location 3 (132.46m) > location 1 (126... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.926855431,
"travel_gain": -0.6030582966,
"wait_gain": -0.7898456373,
"chg_gain": -0.0015085451
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.9253575954,
"travel_gain": -0.5273944888000001,
"wait_gain": -0.8032590676,
"chg_gain": -0.016342770700000002
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.9278139453,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 174 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.474) > location 4 (3.474) > location 3 (3.473) > location 2 (3.472)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (145289.94) > location 1 (139487.13) > location 3 (7773.34) > location 2 (5599.04)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (514.77m) > location 3 (318.41m) > location 4 (144.60m) > location 1 (140... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.734248309,
"travel_gain": -0.5590324423,
"wait_gain": -0.7906264533,
"chg_gain": -0.055992673400000005
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.7319846165000001,
"travel_gain": -0.489424232,
"wait_gain": -0.8074034421,
"chg_gain": -0.0652880376
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.7332674874,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 188 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | C | reducing overall waiting time | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.654) > location 4 (3.651) > location 3 (3.650) > location 2 (3.649)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (124673.00) > location 4 (24315.37) > location 1 (14766.25) > location 2 (8304.09)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (416.39m) > location 1 (238.85m) > location 3 (150.00m) > location 4 (146... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.8751584059000002,
"travel_gain": -0.5778928984,
"wait_gain": -0.7565108547,
"chg_gain": 0.0024836907
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.8719549500000001,
"travel_gain": -0.5841170086,
"wait_gain": -0.7554173242000001,
"chg_gain": 0.008150271800000001
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.87... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 192 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 3 (3.112) > location 4 (3.111) > location 1 (3.109) > location 2 (3.106)
- Demand ranking:
location 1 (160784.38) > location 3 (73941.93) > location 4 (38155.49) > location 2 (5979.73)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (542.23m) > location 4 (306.52m) > location 3 (237.36m) > location 1 (146... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.446919675,
"travel_gain": -0.47645557120000004,
"wait_gain": -0.6670242548,
"chg_gain": -0.1096881635
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.4446372515,
"travel_gain": -0.4184689124,
"wait_gain": -0.678280501,
"chg_gain": -0.1192535113
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.448699037,
"trave... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 196 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | D | reducing overall charging time | - Coverage ranking:
location 4 (3.268) > location 2 (3.267) > location 3 (3.266) > location 1 (3.264)
- Demand ranking:
location 2 (167944.38) > location 4 (83070.46) > location 3 (26843.64) > location 1 (17709.59)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (257.21m) > location 3 (236.43m) > location 4 (183.98m) > location 2 (14... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.5689700353,
"travel_gain": -0.4640223176,
"wait_gain": -0.30522210250000004,
"chg_gain": 0.0899858387
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.5713605814,
"travel_gain": -0.5051565387,
"wait_gain": -0.2997612437,
"chg_gain": 0.0984791148
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.5702004048,
"trav... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 199 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | D | reducing overall charging time | - Coverage ranking:
location 3 (3.097) > location 1 (3.096) > location 2 (3.094) > location 4 (3.092)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (53197.41) > location 1 (32024.92) > location 3 (28863.40) > location 2 (25629.98)
- Distance ranking:
location 3 (278.40m) > location 2 (245.93m) > location 1 (239.94m) > location 4 (132... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.436354707,
"travel_gain": -0.5264091665,
"wait_gain": -0.6565453583,
"chg_gain": -0.018818024500000002
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.434627063,
"travel_gain": -0.5267696231,
"wait_gain": -0.6565653365,
"chg_gain": -0.0188373994
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.4371402067,
"tra... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 206 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | A | enhancing overall station coverage | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (2.775) > location 4 (2.767) > location 2 (2.767) > location 3 (2.762)
- Demand ranking:
location 2 (94930.82) > location 1 (91597.89) > location 3 (42844.50) > location 4 (24740.84)
- Distance ranking:
location 4 (242.55m) > location 1 (223.92m) > location 2 (188.07m) > location 3 (183... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.1838209338,
"travel_gain": -0.41525685290000003,
"wait_gain": -0.5981111442,
"chg_gain": -0.0956446772
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.1776313468,
"travel_gain": -0.41753506830000003,
"wait_gain": -0.586252784,
"chg_gain": -0.08862343900000001
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.173378... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 207 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 3 (2.234) > location 1 (2.228) > location 4 (2.225) > location 2 (2.211)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (106310.25) > location 3 (58092.48) > location 1 (39771.31) > location 2 (9084.05)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (781.69m) > location 3 (479.71m) > location 4 (254.91m) > location 1 (244... | [
{
"cov_gain": 0.7535724655,
"travel_gain": -0.3380806934,
"wait_gain": -0.0568694449,
"chg_gain": 0.1109234525
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.7402416525000001,
"travel_gain": -0.2653508508,
"wait_gain": -0.1215219116,
"chg_gain": 0.0611596457
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.7579092814,
"trave... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 208 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 4 (3.437) > location 1 (3.435) > location 2 (3.431) > location 3 (3.430)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (84105.74) > location 1 (16490.03) > location 4 (10539.31) > location 2 (5520.53)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (506.71m) > location 4 (372.38m) > location 1 (166.51m) > location 3 (142.... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.7031639276,
"travel_gain": -0.5459983409,
"wait_gain": -0.7408343036,
"chg_gain": -0.023067875
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.6997160315,
"travel_gain": -0.47718786560000004,
"wait_gain": -0.7521664262000001,
"chg_gain": -0.0388278097
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.6990344856,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 213 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.517) > location 4 (3.515) > location 2 (3.514) > location 3 (3.513)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (157412.38) > location 2 (152434.43) > location 1 (19890.31) > location 3 (16534.85)
- Distance ranking:
location 3 (247.60m) > location 1 (235.68m) > location 4 (155.86m) > location 2 (1... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.7679350772,
"travel_gain": -0.5251066033,
"wait_gain": -0.7386329778,
"chg_gain": 0.0080130806
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.7657014032,
"travel_gain": -0.4560727055,
"wait_gain": -0.8859321646,
"chg_gain": -0.0436899217
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.7647498254,
"travel_gai... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 219 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | D | reducing overall charging time | - Coverage ranking:
location 3 (2.365) > location 4 (2.358) > location 1 (2.355) > location 2 (2.343)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (106672.25) > location 1 (46467.98) > location 3 (44579.77) > location 2 (28300.30)
- Distance ranking:
location 3 (473.46m) > location 2 (281.12m) > location 1 (216.92m) > location 4 (21... | [
{
"cov_gain": 0.8529470054,
"travel_gain": -0.3584571977,
"wait_gain": -0.2231831323,
"chg_gain": 0.0104033818
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.8435831982,
"travel_gain": -0.35114799999999996,
"wait_gain": -0.22354361120000002,
"chg_gain": 0.0103175035
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.8610972855,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 225 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 4 (3.258) > location 1 (3.258) > location 2 (3.255) > location 3 (3.254)
- Demand ranking:
location 1 (187049.51) > location 2 (171448.17) > location 4 (81521.86) > location 3 (26341.80)
- Distance ranking:
location 3 (232.24m) > location 1 (182.95m) > location 2 (172.37m) > location 4 (1... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.5639158001,
"travel_gain": -0.458490206,
"wait_gain": -0.7544754071,
"chg_gain": -0.1052061922
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.5617431328,
"travel_gain": -0.39649418080000004,
"wait_gain": -0.9360055259000001,
"chg_gain": -0.1688565873
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.56101370470000... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 236 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | C | reducing overall waiting time | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (2.943) > location 3 (2.941) > location 2 (2.937) > location 4 (2.935)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (89887.02) > location 1 (34366.09) > location 2 (32614.52) > location 4 (3012.09)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (244.38m) > location 4 (198.87m) > location 1 (197.74m) > location 3 (160.... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.3157299598,
"travel_gain": -0.4485522563,
"wait_gain": -0.6098234696,
"chg_gain": 0.0053215688
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.3116066829,
"travel_gain": -0.44655576220000004,
"wait_gain": -0.6028197907,
"chg_gain": 0.0084319088
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.3146962353,
"trav... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 260 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | A | enhancing overall station coverage | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.255) > location 2 (3.253) > location 4 (3.251) > location 3 (3.245)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (65567.95) > location 1 (22024.97) > location 3 (16822.36) > location 2 (12501.00)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (397.57m) > location 3 (217.70m) > location 1 (216.87m) > location 4 (160... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.561170069,
"travel_gain": -0.5227534022,
"wait_gain": -0.7531917690000001,
"chg_gain": -0.1048238111
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.5599891495,
"travel_gain": -0.5250618431,
"wait_gain": -0.7373899012,
"chg_gain": -0.09393065760000001
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.5539289977,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 262 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | A | enhancing overall station coverage | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.010) > location 3 (3.005) > location 4 (3.005) > location 2 (3.005)
- Demand ranking:
location 2 (196446.48) > location 3 (30537.41) > location 1 (30012.77) > location 4 (10299.68)
- Distance ranking:
location 3 (424.81m) > location 4 (416.03m) > location 1 (378.34m) > location 2 (20... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.3686412,
"travel_gain": -0.4094758363,
"wait_gain": -0.7563541372,
"chg_gain": -0.15275057050000002
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.3644322599,
"travel_gain": -0.41180011320000004,
"wait_gain": -0.7446737416,
"chg_gain": -0.154356089
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.3646043544,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 266 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.557) > location 4 (3.556) > location 2 (3.556) > location 3 (3.554)
- Demand ranking:
location 2 (152434.43) > location 1 (152015.41) > location 4 (20467.87) > location 3 (4459.14)
- Distance ranking:
location 3 (422.80m) > location 4 (179.71m) > location 2 (148.23m) > location 1 (14... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.7995716208,
"travel_gain": -0.5296088298,
"wait_gain": -0.7249870915000001,
"chg_gain": -0.0032587151
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.7981577706,
"travel_gain": -0.45793939800000005,
"wait_gain": -0.8924091353,
"chg_gain": -0.0633622254
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.7965186480000... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 268 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 2 (2.000) > location 3 (1.994) > location 1 (1.985) > location 4 (1.968)
- Demand ranking:
location 2 (395499.62) > location 3 (394197.17) > location 1 (58692.27) > location 4 (23981.05)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (384.99m) > location 2 (341.66m) > location 3 (298.95m) > location 4 (2... | [
{
"cov_gain": 0.5623212827,
"travel_gain": -0.129047418,
"wait_gain": -0.1480565461,
"chg_gain": -0.0061651538
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.5741883274,
"travel_gain": -0.0299992702,
"wait_gain": -0.1940185592,
"chg_gain": -0.0483377732
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.569225991,
"travel_gain... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 290 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | C | reducing overall waiting time | - Coverage ranking:
location 3 (3.174) > location 2 (3.173) > location 4 (3.170) > location 1 (3.169)
- Demand ranking:
location 2 (177498.30) > location 3 (95845.16) > location 4 (6688.86) > location 1 (0.00)
- Distance ranking:
location 4 (620.28m) > location 1 (233.10m) > location 3 (176.72m) > location 2 (146.39m... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.4936628871,
"travel_gain": -0.5055076722,
"wait_gain": -0.6614447994,
"chg_gain": -0.0706494844
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.4970172044,
"travel_gain": -0.49428505370000003,
"wait_gain": -0.6730336321,
"chg_gain": -0.0938813233
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.4978325858,
"tr... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 291 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.749) > location 4 (3.747) > location 2 (3.745) > location 3 (3.745)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (145173.42) > location 3 (83603.38) > location 1 (30172.83) > location 2 (2214.56)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (448.36m) > location 1 (203.13m) > location 3 (133.56m) > location 4 (132... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.9499515148,
"travel_gain": -0.6228132584,
"wait_gain": -0.8505541805,
"chg_gain": -0.0657403568
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.9472143047000001,
"travel_gain": -0.5740593905,
"wait_gain": -0.8509622082,
"chg_gain": -0.0684118537
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.9469060594,
"tra... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 301 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | C | reducing overall waiting time | - Coverage ranking:
location 2 (3.146) > location 1 (3.145) > location 4 (3.145) > location 3 (3.143)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (158617.93) > location 4 (67197.41) > location 1 (30982.23) > location 2 (20345.41)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (263.74m) > location 2 (189.08m) > location 3 (188.12m) > location 4 (13... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.4752304676,
"travel_gain": -0.548562725,
"wait_gain": -0.7646757510000001,
"chg_gain": -0.0679311642
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.4761425831000001,
"travel_gain": -0.5713158669,
"wait_gain": -0.7439097519000001,
"chg_gain": -0.048267177800000005
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.4... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 305 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | A | enhancing overall station coverage | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.704) > location 4 (3.703) > location 2 (3.700) > location 3 (3.697)
- Demand ranking:
location 2 (111624.71) > location 4 (75797.80) > location 1 (20250.40) > location 3 (1083.15)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (214.34m) > location 4 (170.09m) > location 2 (126.92m) > location 3 (123... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.9145153358,
"travel_gain": -0.6095940657000001,
"wait_gain": -0.7614945288,
"chg_gain": 0.013626699800000001
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.9119493476,
"travel_gain": -0.6003322809,
"wait_gain": -0.7274373294,
"chg_gain": 0.0116254049
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.9092923615,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 313 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | D | reducing overall charging time | - Coverage ranking:
location 2 (3.516) > location 1 (3.516) > location 4 (3.516) > location 3 (3.514)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (83497.87) > location 1 (53427.90) > location 2 (25724.15) > location 3 (17581.06)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (175.82m) > location 1 (166.29m) > location 4 (154.23m) > location 3 (153... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.7667801618,
"travel_gain": -0.5562741191,
"wait_gain": -0.6777436184,
"chg_gain": 0.0125910529
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.7672302143,
"travel_gain": -0.5559925066,
"wait_gain": -0.6790779676,
"chg_gain": 0.0068370908
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.7655153757000002,
"trave... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 329 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 3 (3.338) > location 4 (3.337) > location 2 (3.336) > location 1 (3.336)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (139619.92) > location 4 (16958.00) > location 1 (15119.27) > location 2 (5520.53)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (506.71m) > location 1 (321.42m) > location 4 (210.72m) > location 3 (134... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.6249277313000001,
"travel_gain": -0.4951118156,
"wait_gain": -0.7322824503,
"chg_gain": -0.022436020600000002
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.6253803817999999,
"travel_gain": -0.4698568267,
"wait_gain": -0.743216431,
"chg_gain": -0.0230511083
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.6272003... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 333 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | A | enhancing overall station coverage | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.382) > location 4 (3.379) > location 2 (3.376) > location 3 (3.374)
- Demand ranking:
location 2 (122113.88) > location 4 (45679.36) > location 1 (11480.50) > location 3 (3246.03)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (355.54m) > location 3 (303.29m) > location 4 (211.85m) > location 2 (145... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.6614458615,
"travel_gain": -0.6068817192,
"wait_gain": -0.739771352,
"chg_gain": 0.0334550518
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.6565047807000002,
"travel_gain": -0.5952002183,
"wait_gain": -0.7167528353,
"chg_gain": 0.032636531600000004
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.6550632642,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 354 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | C | reducing overall waiting time | - Coverage ranking:
location 2 (3.739) > location 4 (3.739) > location 3 (3.739) > location 1 (3.737)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (134075.55) > location 3 (127549.49) > location 2 (18089.39) > location 1 (11574.49)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (166.70m) > location 3 (127.52m) > location 4 (125.01m) > location 2 (1... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.9407386019000001,
"travel_gain": -0.6422836327,
"wait_gain": -0.7753627087,
"chg_gain": 0.020832356200000002
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.9425171394,
"travel_gain": -0.6462343078,
"wait_gain": -0.7766982623,
"chg_gain": 0.0221115999
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.94213088580000... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 362 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | D | reducing overall charging time | - Coverage ranking:
location 3 (2.754) > location 1 (2.753) > location 4 (2.753) > location 2 (2.745)
- Demand ranking:
location 1 (219094.64) > location 4 (112310.93) > location 2 (75046.27) > location 3 (43886.82)
- Distance ranking:
location 3 (292.33m) > location 2 (252.64m) > location 4 (202.35m) > location 1 (2... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.1664759931,
"travel_gain": -0.4534036728,
"wait_gain": -0.598793915,
"chg_gain": -0.07107850460000001
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.1604531229,
"travel_gain": -0.46325672090000003,
"wait_gain": -0.592091292,
"chg_gain": -0.0539106943
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.1674904742,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 383 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | C | reducing overall waiting time | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (2.070) > location 4 (2.066) > location 3 (2.062) > location 2 (2.050)
- Demand ranking:
location 1 (281748.57) > location 3 (146001.20) > location 4 (14824.96) > location 2 (0.00)
- Distance ranking:
location 4 (729.75m) > location 3 (256.08m) > location 1 (242.21m) > location 2 (223.3... | [
{
"cov_gain": 0.6288631724,
"travel_gain": -0.1998051753,
"wait_gain": -0.0982459883,
"chg_gain": 0.0190335975
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.6135918455,
"travel_gain": -0.223714407,
"wait_gain": -0.1240259451,
"chg_gain": 0.0170320589
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.6226910612000001,
"travel... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 393 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | D | reducing overall charging time | - Coverage ranking:
location 3 (2.671) > location 4 (2.667) > location 2 (2.667) > location 1 (2.661)
- Demand ranking:
location 1 (157269.28) > location 4 (132137.50) > location 2 (107172.08) > location 3 (48954.11)
- Distance ranking:
location 3 (291.62m) > location 4 (221.63m) > location 1 (220.67m) > location 2 (... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.0940054543,
"travel_gain": -0.346153178,
"wait_gain": -0.5577528427,
"chg_gain": -0.1586665048
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.098648464,
"travel_gain": -0.3530677997,
"wait_gain": -0.6273444431,
"chg_gain": -0.1714557315
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.1019338508,
"travel_gain... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 421 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | A | enhancing overall station coverage | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (2.768) > location 4 (2.761) > location 2 (2.760) > location 3 (2.757)
- Demand ranking:
location 2 (193238.59) > location 4 (76010.12) > location 3 (21336.05) > location 1 (20902.09)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (383.28m) > location 4 (241.14m) > location 3 (195.79m) > location 2 (19... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.1785553881,
"travel_gain": -0.43460050710000003,
"wait_gain": -0.3380070157,
"chg_gain": -0.0170787926
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.1716187885,
"travel_gain": -0.4315473014,
"wait_gain": -0.34045711710000004,
"chg_gain": -0.029670316300000003
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.1695... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 440 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | A | enhancing overall station coverage | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.240) > location 3 (3.239) > location 4 (3.236) > location 2 (3.235)
- Demand ranking:
location 1 (38696.67) > location 4 (29423.94) > location 3 (25602.73) > location 2 (16665.79)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (246.83m) > location 3 (223.54m) > location 2 (188.37m) > location 4 (154... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.5495235424,
"travel_gain": -0.5377904103,
"wait_gain": -0.33748712940000003,
"chg_gain": 0.08232680070000001
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.5455087550000002,
"travel_gain": -0.5118728404,
"wait_gain": -0.3628654611,
"chg_gain": 0.0443923177
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.54890381... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 447 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | A | enhancing overall station coverage | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (2.798) > location 2 (2.795) > location 3 (2.791) > location 4 (2.791)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (124796.70) > location 1 (87156.01) > location 2 (38048.85) > location 3 (25644.65)
- Distance ranking:
location 3 (287.74m) > location 2 (249.93m) > location 1 (221.39m) > location 4 (20... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.2019017243,
"travel_gain": -0.41840563280000004,
"wait_gain": -0.5967045912,
"chg_gain": -0.0751757148
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.1991837868,
"travel_gain": -0.41950959250000003,
"wait_gain": -0.5868370045,
"chg_gain": -0.0684357849
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.1966370245,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 462 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | A | enhancing overall station coverage | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (2.331) > location 3 (2.318) > location 2 (2.315) > location 4 (2.310)
- Demand ranking:
location 2 (254917.87) > location 4 (79565.08) > location 1 (54280.14) > location 3 (42854.41)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (493.17m) > location 3 (305.16m) > location 4 (272.46m) > location 2 (24... | [
{
"cov_gain": 0.8345695916,
"travel_gain": -0.28533206980000003,
"wait_gain": -0.21572236150000001,
"chg_gain": -0.0050270744000000004
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.8220422847000001,
"travel_gain": -0.2826216995,
"wait_gain": -0.21765432710000002,
"chg_gain": -0.0351554015
},
{
"cov... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 489 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (1.890) > location 2 (1.881) > location 4 (1.874) > location 3 (1.866)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (378324.70) > location 3 (121634.28) > location 1 (61461.21) > location 2 (28996.25)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (1627.26m) > location 1 (590.21m) > location 4 (327.78m) > location 3 (... | [
{
"cov_gain": 0.4874983752,
"travel_gain": 0.0617450664,
"wait_gain": -0.1658825659,
"chg_gain": -0.0673156058
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.4802516529,
"travel_gain": 0.1318142064,
"wait_gain": -0.160509333,
"chg_gain": -0.058780401100000004
},
{
"cov_gain": 0.4683241561,
"trav... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 496 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | A | enhancing overall station coverage | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.688) > location 2 (3.688) > location 3 (3.685) > location 4 (3.684)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (41370.76) > location 4 (14826.57) > location 2 (13807.62) > location 1 (11110.33)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (346.92m) > location 2 (267.74m) > location 4 (136.93m) > location 3 (122... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.9025740626,
"travel_gain": -0.5889518583000001,
"wait_gain": -0.7159574382,
"chg_gain": 0.0688072948
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.9021569696,
"travel_gain": -0.5812253310000001,
"wait_gain": -0.7294376858,
"chg_gain": 0.053295948600000004
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.89960173... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 528 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 4 (3.734) > location 1 (3.733) > location 2 (3.731) > location 3 (3.731)
- Demand ranking:
location 4 (121732.98) > location 3 (84426.95) > location 1 (65614.45) > location 2 (2214.56)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (448.36m) > location 3 (168.59m) > location 4 (144.08m) > location 1 (143... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.9378479997,
"travel_gain": -0.6127721757,
"wait_gain": -0.8726027629,
"chg_gain": -0.08229426320000001
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.9362322556,
"travel_gain": -0.572752122,
"wait_gain": -0.85193644,
"chg_gain": -0.07691609740000001
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.9360935904,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 538 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | D | reducing overall charging time | - Coverage ranking:
location 3 (3.551) > location 4 (3.551) > location 2 (3.550) > location 1 (3.547)
- Demand ranking:
location 2 (145769.41) > location 4 (77874.01) > location 3 (62858.04) > location 1 (3160.45)
- Distance ranking:
location 1 (247.83m) > location 2 (159.21m) > location 4 (157.57m) > location 3 (153... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.7909878022,
"travel_gain": -0.5859307652,
"wait_gain": -0.8400404687,
"chg_gain": -0.0790111968
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.7936921882,
"travel_gain": -0.5796979443,
"wait_gain": -0.8514713230000001,
"chg_gain": -0.09068372370000001
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.7948123938,
... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 551 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 4 (3.226) > location 1 (3.225) > location 3 (3.224) > location 2 (3.219)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (145472.46) > location 4 (68609.96) > location 1 (30581.61) > location 2 (4692.39)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (455.85m) > location 1 (373.87m) > location 4 (179.81m) > location 3 (170... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.5379261448000001,
"travel_gain": -0.47775165900000005,
"wait_gain": -0.6109714895,
"chg_gain": 0.0413175572
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.533270323,
"travel_gain": -0.44706321450000003,
"wait_gain": -0.6163300215,
"chg_gain": 0.0303408384
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.537038074... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 575 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
## Task Description
We are tasked with determining the optimal location for a new electric vehicle (EV) charging station to maximize benefits by effectively meeting demand. The candidate locations, along with their expected charging station coverage, demand (number of vehicles), average distance, travel time, and wait... | B | minimizing overall travel time | - Coverage ranking:
location 1 (3.420) > location 4 (3.416) > location 3 (3.415) > location 2 (3.414)
- Demand ranking:
location 3 (137943.75) > location 4 (43939.37) > location 1 (20509.08) > location 2 (5977.48)
- Distance ranking:
location 2 (529.16m) > location 1 (273.39m) > location 3 (149.44m) > location 4 (136... | [
{
"cov_gain": 1.6911890465,
"travel_gain": -0.5585213014,
"wait_gain": -0.7938402517,
"chg_gain": -0.077209609
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.6868426202,
"travel_gain": -0.4846506802,
"wait_gain": -0.8081943047,
"chg_gain": -0.095480808
},
{
"cov_gain": 1.6877430663,
"travel_gain... | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset | question_answering/Data/poi_placement/planning_QA.json | poi_placement | planning | 587 | [
"planning",
"poi_placement"
] | 0.1 | 20,260,606 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
ποΈ USTBench ST Understanding + Planning 10% Sample
A deterministic, stratified QA subset for urban spatial-temporal reasoning and planning
USTBench ST Planning 10% is a public, deterministic subset of Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset, focused on process-based spatial-temporal understanding and planning QA.
Quick Start Β· At a Glance Β· Files Β· Sampling Β· Citation
This is a sampled subset, not the full USTBench release. It keeps only
st_understandingandplanning, uses a deterministic 10% sampling policy, and preserves provenance fields so each row can be traced back to the original USTBench source file and index.
β¨ Why This Subset?
USTBench is useful for evaluating urban spatial-temporal reasoning, but the full QA tree can be heavy for quick experiments, smoke tests, and prompt iteration. This dataset keeps a compact, stratified slice of the two process-based QA subsets most directly aligned with spatial-temporal understanding and planning.
It is designed for questions like:
- Can a model answer urban spatial-temporal reasoning questions from a lightweight sample?
- How do results differ between
st_understandingandplanningtasks? - Can experiments run against both Hugging Face JSONL and USTBench-compatible file layouts?
- Can every sampled row be traced back to its original task, file, and index?
π¦ Dataset at a Glance
| 4,131 sampled QA cases |
2 kept subsets |
10% sampling fraction |
20260606 sampling seed |
2,631st_understanding |
1,500planning |
9 source task folders |
2 file layouts |
Included subsets
| Subset | Sampled cases | Stratification |
|---|---|---|
st_understanding |
2,631 | Source task Γ spatial/temporal type Γ relation. |
planning |
1,500 | Source task. |
| Total | 4,131 | Deterministic 10% sample. |
Task coverage
congestion_prediction Β· next_poi_prediction Β· poi_placement Β· road_planning Β· route_planning Β· socio_ecomic_prediction Β· traffic_od_prediction Β· traffic_signal_control Β· urban_planning
The original release uses the folder name
socio_ecomic_prediction. This sample also includes a compatibility aliassocio_economic_predictionfor the same sampled rows because USTBench example scripts use that spelling. The alias is not counted inmetadata/counts.jsontotals.
π Quick Start
Load the combined JSONL file:
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset(
"json",
data_files="https://huggingface.co/datasets/zhangdw/USTBench-ST-Planning-10pct/resolve/main/data/all.jsonl",
split="train",
)
print(len(ds))
print(ds[0].keys())
Load the two subsets separately:
from datasets import load_dataset
base = "https://huggingface.co/datasets/zhangdw/USTBench-ST-Planning-10pct/resolve/main"
files = {
"st_understanding": f"{base}/data/st_understanding.jsonl",
"planning": f"{base}/data/planning.jsonl",
}
data = load_dataset("json", data_files=files)
print(data["st_understanding"].num_rows)
print(data["planning"].num_rows)
Use the original USTBench-style tree after download:
hf download zhangdw/USTBench-ST-Planning-10pct \
--type dataset \
--local-dir data/ustbench-st-planning-10pct
question_answering/Data/<task>/st_understanding_QA.json
question_answering/Data/<task>/planning_QA.json
ποΈ Files
| Path | Description |
|---|---|
data/st_understanding.jsonl |
Hugging Face-friendly JSONL for the sampled ST-understanding cases. |
data/planning.jsonl |
Hugging Face-friendly JSONL for the sampled planning cases. |
data/all.jsonl |
Concatenation of both sampled subsets. |
metadata/counts.json |
Source counts, sample counts, sampling seed, and stratum-level details. |
question_answering/Data/<task>/*_QA.json |
USTBench-compatible tree for scripts expecting the original layout. |
π§ Example Workflows
Inspect provenance fields
row = ds[0]
provenance = {k: v for k, v in row.items() if k.startswith("_ustbench_")}
print(provenance)
Each sampled row includes _ustbench_ fields for source file, source task, subset, original index, sampling cell, seed, and sampling fraction.
Count rows by subset and task
import pandas as pd
df = ds.to_pandas()
print(df.groupby(["_ustbench_subset", "_ustbench_source_task"]).size())
Read the deterministic sampling manifest
import json
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
path = hf_hub_download(
repo_id="zhangdw/USTBench-ST-Planning-10pct",
repo_type="dataset",
filename="metadata/counts.json",
)
with open(path, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
counts = json.load(f)
print(counts["sampling_seed"])
print(counts["total_sampled_cases"])
π§ͺ Sampling Policy
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Source dataset | Haruto2099/USTBench-Dataset |
| Sampling fraction | 0.1 |
| Sampling seed | 20260606 |
| Kept subsets | st_understanding, planning |
st_understanding strata |
Source task, spatial/temporal type, spatial/temporal relation. |
planning strata |
Source task. |
The goal is stable, reproducible coverage rather than a new benchmark protocol. Use the full USTBench release when full-scale reporting is required.
β Intended Use
This subset is useful for:
- quick prompt and evaluator iteration before running full USTBench;
- lightweight spatial-temporal QA experiments;
- comparing process-based
st_understandingandplanningbehavior; - reproducing experiments with explicit sampling provenance;
- testing code that expects either JSONL or the original USTBench directory layout.
βοΈ License
This sampled dataset follows the CC-BY-4.0 license metadata of the upstream source dataset. Check the original USTBench release for source-specific terms and citation expectations.
π Citation
If you use this sample, cite the original USTBench paper for the benchmark design and cite this deterministic subset when the 10% sampling procedure matters for reproducibility:
@misc{lai2025ustbenchbenchmarkingdissectingspatiotemporal,
title = {USTBench: Benchmarking and Dissecting Spatiotemporal Reasoning of LLMs as Urban Agents},
author = {Siqi Lai and Yansong Ning and Zirui Yuan and Zhixi Chen and Hao Liu},
year = {2025},
eprint = {2505.17572},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.AI},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.17572}
}
You may also cite this deterministic subset when the sampling policy matters for reproducibility:
@misc{ustbench_st_planning_10pct2026,
title = {USTBench ST Understanding + Planning 10% Sample},
author = {Dawei Zhang},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Hugging Face Dataset},
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/zhangdw/USTBench-ST-Planning-10pct}
}
A compact, provenance-preserving slice of USTBench for urban spatial-temporal QA experiments.
- Downloads last month
- 72