| # Contributing to `shinka` |
|
|
| Thank you for your interest in contributing to `shinka` and ShinkaEvolve. We welcome code contributions, bug reports, feature requests, documentation improvements, and representative benchmark results. |
|
|
| ## Contributing code using pull requests |
|
|
| We use git for development, and contributions are expected to come in through pull requests. |
|
|
| Follow these steps to contribute code: |
|
|
| 1. Fork the repository on GitHub. |
| 2. Install Python >= 3.10 and `uv`. |
| 3. Clone your fork and install the project with development dependencies: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| git clone https://github.com/SakanaAI/ShinkaEvolve.git |
| cd ShinkaEvolve |
| uv sync --dev |
| ``` |
|
|
| 4. Add the main repository as an upstream remote: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| git remote add upstream https://github.com/SakanaAI/ShinkaEvolve.git |
| ``` |
|
|
| 5. Create a branch for your change: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| git checkout -b name-of-change |
| ``` |
|
|
| 6. Implement your change. If the change fixes a bug or guards against a regression, add or update tests when it fits. |
| 7. Run the built-in checks from the repository root before opening a pull request: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| uv run ruff check tests --exclude tests/file.py |
| uv run mypy --follow-imports=skip --ignore-missing-imports tests/test_*.py tests/conftest.py |
| uv run --with pytest-cov pytest -q -m "not requires_secrets" --cov=shinka --cov-report=term-missing --cov-report=xml:coverage.xml |
| ``` |
|
|
| If your change touches provider integrations or other secret-backed paths and you have the required credentials configured, also run: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| uv run pytest -q -m "requires_secrets" |
| ``` |
|
|
| 8. Commit your change with a clear message, sync with the latest `main`, then push your branch: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| git add path/to/file.py |
| git commit -m "feat: describe the change" |
| git fetch upstream |
| git rebase upstream/main |
| git push --set-upstream origin name-of-change |
| ``` |
|
|
| 9. Open a pull request using the repository template and include the requested context. |
|
|
| ## Issue structure |
|
|
| Please use the GitHub issue templates. Good issues are specific and reproducible. |
|
|
| Bug reports should include: |
|
|
| - A short summary |
| - Steps to reproduce |
| - Expected behavior |
| - Actual behavior |
| - Environment details |
| - Logs, stack traces, screenshots, or a minimal script when available |
|
|
| Feature requests should include: |
|
|
| - The problem or motivation |
| - The proposed change |
| - Alternatives you considered |
| - A validation plan or example use case |
|
|
| ## Pull request structure |
|
|
| Please use the pull request template. Every PR should include: |
|
|
| - A concise summary of the change |
| - Why the change is needed |
| - Linked issues or related context |
| - Tests run and their outcomes |
| - Risks, limitations, or backward-compatibility notes when relevant |
|
|
| If you change user-facing behavior, docs, CLI output, or WebUI behavior, include updated documentation or screenshots where appropriate. |
|
|
| ## Core program evolution pipeline changes |
|
|
| Changes to the core program evolution pipeline require extra evidence. If your PR changes parent selection, mutation/edit generation, archive updates, prompt evolution, novelty logic, evaluation scheduling, proposal oversubscription, island behavior, or other central evolution logic, include: |
|
|
| - Results on at least one representative runnable example |
| - A comparison against a baseline |
| - The exact commands or config overrides used |
| - The metric(s) you are comparing |
| - A short interpretation of the result |
|
|
| Do not add random benchmark tasks or examples just to justify a PR. Use a representative task that highlights the capability you are changing, for example a new programming language backend, a new execution mode, or a new core optimization behavior. |
|
|
| The baseline can be the current `main` branch, a tagged release, or an explicitly named prior configuration. Make the comparison easy for reviewers to reproduce. |
|
|
| ## AI-assisted contributions |
|
|
| AI-assisted issue reports and pull requests are welcome, but not AI slop. Every submission should be human-verified, technically understood by the author, and edited into a clean, minimal, reviewable change. |
|
|
| We will spend roughly as much time reviewing a PR as the human author spent creating it. Tid for tad. If a contributor did not invest the time to validate, simplify, benchmark, and explain a change, we will not invest that time on review either. |
|
|
| Please take Occam's razor seriously. Prefer the smallest change that solves the problem clearly. A 1000-line implementation for a niche feature will not be merged. |
|
|
| ## License |
|
|
| By contributing, you agree that your contributions will be licensed under the repository's Apache 2.0 license. |
|
|