onedayagent_traj / README.md
JohnsonZheng03's picture
Add files using upload-large-folder tool
f58bae8 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
6.92 kB
# OneDayAgent Trajectory Data
Execution trajectories and LLM-as-judge scores for all experiments reported in
*OneDayAgent: Towards a Long-Horizon Harness for Autonomous Agents* (Zheng et al., 2026),
evaluated on the AgentIF-OneDay benchmark (104 tasks, 767 instance-level rubric points).
This bundle contains the raw evidence chain for every reported run: the full
agent trajectory, the final deliverable artifacts, and the per-criterion judge
scores. Every headline number in the paper is directly reproducible from the
files here, with no external dependencies.
---
## 1. Runs included
Nine runs, each covering the full 104-task AgentIF-OneDay suite. Six main
backends (Section 3.2 / Table 3) plus one additional baseline and three
ablation variants (Section 3.3 / Table 4).
| Run directory | Paper role | Backend LLM | Paper overall score |
|------------------------------------------------|-------------------|----------------------------|----------------------|
| `onedayagent_glm52_20260623_132100_8210` | OneDayAgent (main)| GLM-5.2 | **0.821** |
| `onedayagent_gemini31propreview_20260513_*` | backend variant | Gemini-3.1-Pro-Preview | 0.743 |
| `onedayagent_qwen35_397b_20260610_*` | backend variant | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | 0.708 |
| `onedayagent_qwen35_9b_20260507_*` | backend variant | Qwen3.5-9B | 0.624 |
| `onedayagent_qwen36_27b_20250618_*` | backend variant | Qwen3.6-27B | 0.613 |
| `codex_gpt55_20260622_174300_6643` | baseline | Codex (GPT-5.5 medium) | 0.664 |
| `ablation_study/ablation_glm52_react_direct_*` | DIRECT | GLM-5.2 | 0.771 |
| `ablation_study/ablation_glm52_decompose_only_*`| DECOMP | GLM-5.2 | 0.804 |
| `ablation_study/ablation_glm52_verify_only_*` | VERIFY | GLM-5.2 | 0.804 |
The `FULL` ablation variant is not duplicated under `ablation_study/`; it is
identical to the main `onedayagent_glm52_*` run (both modules enabled).
---
## 2. Uniform per-run layout
Every run has the same six components.
```
<run>/
├── auto_score_<ts>.jsonl # 767 lines — per-rubric judge scores
├── auto_score_<ts>.txt # human-readable aggregate of the above
├── run_<ts>.log # runtime log
├── env_snapshot.txt # runtime environment config
├── <Backend>_<ts>/ # backend subdir, contains only:
│ └── rollout1.jsonl # 104 lines — one full trajectory per task
└── taskif_<id>_<ts>/ # 104 dirs — final deliverable artifacts per task
└── ... # whatever the agent produced (xlsx/png/md/pptx/...)
```
These six items form the complete evidence chain
(task definition → agent execution → final artifact → judge score) for every run.
---
## 3. `rollout1.jsonl` — the core trajectory file
One JSON object per line, 104 lines per run. Same schema for every backend,
including the Codex baseline (only `trajectory.ext_info.agent` differs,
`ReactAgent` vs `CodexAgent`).
### Top-level fields (per line)
| Field | Type | Content |
|---|---|---|
| `question_id` | str | e.g. `taskif_111` |
| `title`, `description` | str | task statement |
| `attachment_filenames` | list[str] | user-provided input files |
| `score_criteria` | list[obj] | all rubric points: `{content, score}` (the 767 total) |
| `reference_answer_attachment_filenames` | list[str] | reference deliverables |
| `task_tag` | str | interaction pattern: `Open Workflow Execution` / `Latent Instruction Inference` / `Iterative Refinement` |
| `domain_tag` | str | `Work` / `Life` / `Study` |
| `rubrics_tag` | str | `Execution` / `Content` / `Form` |
| `time` | str | time budget: `<1h` / `1-4h` / `4-8h` / `8-12h` / `12-24h` / `24+h` |
| `question` | str | full prompt sent to the agent |
| `prediction` | str | agent's final textual answer |
| `time_cost` | float | wall-clock latency in seconds (Table 3 Latency column) |
| `result_files` | list[str] | final deliverable filenames (match `taskif_<id>_*` contents) |
| `task_ts` | str | per-task start timestamp `YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS` |
| `trajectory` | obj | full conversation (see below) |
### `trajectory` sub-object
```
trajectory:
guid : str — trajectory id
system_message : {token_cost, role, content, tool_specs} — system prompt + tool schemas
conversations : list[stage] — ordered execution stages (see below)
ext_info : {type, model, agent, task_description, task_seed}
create_time : str — ISO timestamp
```
### `conversations` — execution stages
Each run is split into ordered stages. A typical full OneDayAgent task has:
| idx | stage | `questions` | `solutions` | `answer` |
|-----|------------|------------------------|--------------------|-----------------------|
| 0 | planning | task + planner output | — | subtask JSON list |
| 1..n| subtask | subtask prompt | ReAct turns (reason/act/observe) | subtask summary |
| n+1 | synthesis | synthesis prompt | — | candidate deliverable |
| n+2 | verify | verification prompt | — | `{completed, reason, missing_items, suggestions}` |
| n+3 | repair? | (only when verify fails) repair feedback + ReAct turns | repaired deliverable |
The DIRECT ablation has a single subtask stage and no verify/repair. The
DECOMP variant has subtask decomposition but no verify/repair. The VERIFY
variant has verify/repair but no decomposition.
---
## 4. `auto_score_*.jsonl` / `.txt` — judge scores
### `auto_score_*.jsonl` — 767 lines (one per rubric criterion, summed across 104 tasks)
```json
{
"question_id": "taskif_111",
"agent_name": "react",
"method": "gemini-3.1-pro-preview", // the judge model
"criterion_content": "The returned file accurately names the subtable \"March\"...",
"criterion_score": 1, // 0 or 1
"satisfied": true,
"reasoning": "The answer successfully created a new worksheet named 'March'..."
}
```
`method` is the LLM-as-judge (Gemini-3.1-Pro-Preview, temperature 0.1,
65 536 max tokens; see Table 2). `agent_name` is always the literal `"react"`
regardless of the actual backend — identify runs by directory name, not this
field.
### `auto_score_*.txt` — pre-aggregated report
Contains the headline number and all Table 3 / Table 4 breakdowns (by task
type, domain, rubric dimension, time budget, with/without attachments). The
`Average score` line is exactly the paper's normalized overall score ×100.