prompt
stringlengths 8
10.3k
| chosen
stringlengths 0
11.2k
| rejected
stringlengths 0
5.09k
| Preference Direction
listlengths 90
90
| Demographic Information
stringlengths 4
1.11k
| User-Generated Content
listlengths 0
16
| Pair-wise Comparative Feedback
listlengths 0
16
| clustered_20
int32 0
19
| __index_level_0__
int64 5
1.29M
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Today I visited the school bookstore. The year's already begun so not many people still have to buy books, and the store was pretty empty. Just me and a cute girl who immediately struck me as likely being into girls herself (which I never notice, normally; I'm usually painfully oblivious). We bought our books and then both left the store and got onto the same bus.
Over the course of the bus ride, I kept sneaking glances like the awkward person I am. She had an almost stereotypically short haircut, a rainbow pin on her bag, and of course she was extremely pretty... And then I looked over at the same moment that she looked straight at me. Our eyes met, and hers lingered.
So, I took the logical course of action and panicked. I immediately pulled the cord to stop the bus, jumped up, and got off the bus many stops before I needed to. I then spent half an hour walking home carrying heavy schoolbooks and a building sense of regret.
...And that was the most interesting part of my day so far. I also think it's a pretty accurate depiction of my awkwardness, unfortunately.
Hey AL, thought you might appreciate the amusement of my awkward bus encounter.
|
At least now you know which bus she takes! Haha XD
|
I am actually really disappointed in the Reddit-machine right now. I was hoping to come into this thread and someone would be like, "Hey, were you wearing the cool red converse and is your school mascot a Green Antelope?" and OP would be like, "Why, yes, yes, I was and yes, it is! How did you know?" and random redditor would respond thusly: "I was the girl with the rainbow pin!!! My bag is blue, so you know I'm not a creeper. Wanna grab a coffee this afternoon?"
This is what I want to happen. Regardless of whether a similar conversation to this imaginary one occurs later, OP: you are not alone in the awkwardness department. I tend to freeze up a bit when I see a hot lady checking me out. We'll get better. :)
|
[
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
] |
This person likes humor.
This person dislikes emotions.
An extroverted young adult who finds humor in everyday awkward moments and isn't bothered by minor social mishaps. They enjoy casual interactions and don't take themselves too seriously, often finding joy in unexpected situations. This persona values lightheartedness and sees humor as a way to cope with social discomfort.
|
[
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0.5,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "You and your husband hold all the power in this situation (unless there are financial ties to your FIL that you haven't mentioned). All you need to do is say no. No prayer. No church. No homophobia. No discussion. \n\nHe'll come around when he realizes that his relationship with you and your child is more important than his opinions regarding some dude in the sky. Or he won't. Whatever.\n",
"prompt": "My father in law is an okay person. He is a decent grandpa to my daughter, and our family. He has always been welcoming to me. \n\nMy husband and I both aren't religious. We have nothing against it, it's just not something that intrests us. We both were raised in a very strict religious home. \n\nFather in law is really really religious. He often insisted we pray before any meal we have, out to eat, at my house, or at his home. He gets upset that my daughter who is 1 year and 7 months dosnt stay silent during his 4 minute minimum pray time. He is insisting on taking my daughter to church with him next weekend. \n\nMy parents respect that we don't pray, and dont make us pray when we eat with them, and they never bring up religion or church to us. \n\nFather in law also uses religion to be hateful to gay people. His sister is lesbian, and he has a gay nephew. My daughter and I love visiting them, and other non religious family members. When we come back from visiting anyone who isn't religious father in law will pester is with question about whether these \"wayward family members have lead our daughter astray, or made her gay\" \n\nI have had many spirited conversations about why I don't go to chruch, why we don't pray, and why we don't think it's a negative thing to to gay. He dosnt care about how we feel, or that we don't want to pray, or want to go to church. \n\nI also have no problem with my daughter going to church once she is older, and voices that she has made a choice and wants to see what it's about. but right now she can't sit still thru cartoons... Let alone a church meeting that lasts for hours. \n\nTo the parents who arnt religious, how do you deal with a family member pushing religious beliefs down your throat over and over, regardless of how many times you told them it's not for you? \n\nTldr: religious/homophobic Father in law is pushing my daughter to go to church and pray, and not be gay even tho husband and I are not religious\nMy father in law (M 58) is really religious, and homophobic. I feel like he pushes these ideas down my daughter (F 1.5) and my throats."
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "ALL flirting is not obvious because I'm unless 🙃\n",
"prompt": "I'm wondering how can you flirt in a way that's obvious but not obvious if you get what I'm saying like is there a way to flirt then ramp up the intensity if someone flirts back or does no such thing exists in the world of flirtation?\nCan you flirt without being obvious?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Straight best friend. NEXT.\n",
"prompt": "For me, I had two: my neighbor that I played \"house\" with when I was like 8 (aka I was the dad she was the mom, we pretended to have sex & kissed some) and my friends mom who I saw in her (rather sexy & sultry) sleep gown during a 6th grade sleepover. Was originally going to ask about crushes on friend's parents specifically, but I'm curious about other people's first hints of sexuality as well.\nWho was your first crush/how you realized something was up?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
0,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Just because her son has autism gives her no right to allow him to terrorize and physically bully your child. The mother was slow to respond to the last incident and you were merely trying to protect your daughter. I find it bold that she had the nerve to ask you not to touch her child when her kid was being so physically aggressive with yours.\n\nI can understand one incident, but the subsequent incidents I would’ve probably spoken to a manager to intervene and speak to the woman.\n",
"prompt": "Today I took my three kids ages 7 (boy), 4 (boy) and girl (3) to an indoor play space area. There were train tables to play with as one of the activities. My daughter (3) loves trains and went right over to play. \n\nA bigger kid, maybe 10, immediately zeros in on her and rushes over and screams in her face, absolutely unprovoked. My daughter is startled and starts to cry. The mother of the boy comes over and literally drags him away and then explains that he has autism. I accept her apology without rancor and shrug it off. Two minutes later he is back and he screams at her again and pushes her. The mother hustles him away and I move my daughter to the dress up corner thinking maybe he doesn’t like anyone playing with the trains. I put a princess costume on her and she is happy. She runs over to look at herself in the mirror and the big kid appears again, grabs her by the skirt and throws her to the ground, all while screaming at her. By now my daughter is hysterical, and I am holding her. The mother apologizes again and brings him to a different area, and we move back to the trains but this time I sit next to her/behind her on the floor. \n\nWithin a few minutes the kids is back and he rushes my daughter and grabs her by her arm before I can stop him, and starts attempting to haul her up on to the train table, all while shrieking at her. I hang on to her and put my hand on his arm to get him to let go, all while calmly asking him to leave her alone. The mother comes over, removes him by dragging him away and asks me not to touch her child, real nasty with me. I respond that he was hurting my tiny, three year old daughter and she says “well, he has autism”. \n\nI decide it is time to leave, since we won’t be able to have fun, and I ask to speak to the manager and ask for my money back, as we only were able to “play” for 20 minutes, and I explain why. He sort of apologizes and gives me a voucher to come back another day. I have to take my three crying kids home while this kid gets to stay and play.\n\nHow would you have handled this?\nHow should I handle a situation like this in the future?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Well to be fair, fucking while blind folded is really fun.\n",
"prompt": "Okay so here's the thing, I don't know if anyone remembers but a while ago I posted something about a friend of mine I'm totally in love with. Long story short: I've known her for a very long time, had these feelings for months and they don't go away. I'm too much of a coward to actually tell her how I feel, but occasionally I'll take a stab at trying to make her realise it on her own in some weird way or another. \n\nFast forward to today:\nShe's tall, like really tall, and I found this video on Facebook that was actually pretty funny, but also highlights the fact that on social media it's often shorties (like me) that get the attention because people think we're cute. Anyways the video was just really funny and overall tall girl appreciation. So I share it to her privately through the messenger app and tell her to watch it and that she's beautiful and amazing. She literally just answered \"lol\" to that, which is just her way of playing cool or tough or whatever. She does it quite a lot, so I don't mind it but I did feel like okay time to do away with the I-dont-have-feelings facade for once... so I told her to just admit that she needs to hear it too sometimes, turns out no one EVER told her she was beautiful. I honestly was pretty shocked for a moment, only to feel so angry at any and all of her exes right after. How could they have ever been with her and actually have loved her and not even once let her know they appreciate the first thing you notice about someone? I don't care if you fall for someone's looks or for their personality, you can't take away the fact that when you meet someone the first thing you notice is how they look. Anyway, I told her I'd make it a point to remind her of that more often then, thinking that the next time I'd tell her would be tomorrow morning when I get up, you know to put a smile on her face when she wakes up and it would probably be awkward to say it like every other minute or so... couldn't wait that long though, so I ended up messaging it a little earlier, only to be told I'm a kiss-ass (taking the added emoji into account, I can safely say she was joking though), so I told her that it wasn't kissing ass if I meant it and that I told her that I'd remind her more often. She answered I'm crazy.\n\nI won't deny that I am, but you know... if someone very specifically takes out the time to remind you on a regular basis that you are beautiful, I'd hope it was obvious I'm in love with her?\nis she fucking blind?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Started at 22. I’m 29 now. \n\nThe idea that if you don’t start your transition as a literal child your life is over is ridiculous.\n",
"prompt": "I am 20 and pre everything.\nI‘ve kinda known that I was trans since 14 but I went back into denial til one and a half years ago.\nI really want to start transition but my depression umong other things is holding me back.\n\nI know that there are a lot of people that start transition late, even some in their 50s or later and great for them honestly.\n\nMy problem is, that I never seem to find trans folks that start their transition in that ,,middle“ age but instead are mostly very young( I‘m aware that I’m stil young I just find it hard to relate to most 15 year olds i guess)\n\nI’m grieving both the time I lost, in denial and also kinda feel like I’m the only one starting so late even though I grew up extremely Trans friendly and never had any major internalized transphobia…\nIt feels like I should have known way sooner…\nMakes me feel like I might be wrong about this idk \n\nBut then I realize that part of my fear of going to a therapist is that I’m scared that they will tell me I’m not trans and that I would have to live as a girl again(obvsly I wouldn’t have to) \nAnd the fact that I’m so scared of that is telling I guess? Idk\n\nSorry for rambling but This has been waying on my mind…\nTransitioning in my 20s"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "I just keep a few in the crib.\n",
"prompt": "Does anyone have any success stories in helping a little one (1.5 yrs) keep from intentionally throwing her pacifiers out of their crib?\nPushing Pacifiers Out of The Crib"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "It's Wrath month.\n",
"prompt": "It’s July 1st, which means that it’s no longer Pride Month. But you know what, Pride is never over. Be proud of who you are every day.\nIt’s never over"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Rizzoli and Isles? That still a thing?\n",
"prompt": "AL, I need help! I am hit with a sudden craving for fanfiction--you know, the long, trope-laden kind? But the thing is that I really want girl-on-girl stories right now, and I've never been aware of any areas where that's popular (aside from maybe Xena, and I suspect that's link-rot central), and trying to come up with potential places is daunting when so few shows/books/whatever have multiple interesting female characters. I've also not been in any fandom for quite some time, so my fan friends have thinned out.\n\nSo, any recommendations? Specific stories or a point in the right direction, I don't care. I don't even care if I'm not familiar with the canon at all, as long as the story isn't incomprehensible without knowledge of canon.\n\n*By \"good\" I mean engaging. The trashier the storyline the better!\nFandoms with good lady/lady fanfiction?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "She just clocked your nails.\n",
"prompt": "ME: *examines*\n\nHER: Your hands are icy cold!\n\nME: Oh dear! Am I sick?\n\nHER: Yes, you should go lie in bed with lots of blankets. And your girlfriend!\n \nHER PARENTS: *nearly die trying to apologise*\n\nME: *laughs in gay*\nA conversation with a five-year-old patient this evening"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "I belive in astrology.\n",
"prompt": "I saw this asked somewhere else and I thought it would be funny (and something different) to do here.\nRuin a first date in four words."
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Ironic that you didn't bother and yet you sit here judging my creativity.\n",
"prompt": "/r/BoiFashionAdvice/\n\n/r/MaleFashionAdvice tends not to help us out much, though their style is great, and /r/LesbianFashionAdvice is dead and focuses primarily on femmes. I created something for those of us who are bois, and fall somewhere south of masculine but not quite feminine either.\nI started a fashion advice subreddit for bois! Come check us out, link in body."
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Though the song is ambiguous and up to each listener over whether or not it's gay (I think it totally is), you should give \"Hey Girl\" by Lady Gaga ft. Florence Welch a try.\n",
"prompt": "Looking for lesbian relatable music and lesbian singers. Need more lesbian friendly tunes for my playlist. Any recommendations would be appreciated! Thanks!\nLesbian Music For Playlist"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "I would ask yourself whether a narcissist with failing eyesight is an appropriate carer for your daughter overnight. Honestly, missing poop can happen and I didn't see it so I can't judge that, but your description of your mother sounds to me like someone who perhaps isn't the best person to trust with your child for long periods of time.\n",
"prompt": "I'm really confused about what I should do, if anything. I'd like some advice on my situation... \n\nMy husband and I went to a friends wedding, it was about an hour drive away along a road with lots of bends, no kids, alcohol etc, so we left our daughter with my mother over night.\n\nMy mother is a bit of a narcissist, knows it all, is never wrong and very childish. When we came home and I changed our daughters nappy, there was a clear ring of left over pop that hadn't been cleaned properly, there was also spots of poop up her backside, so it wasn't a fresh one that didn't come out. It just wasn't cleaned properly.\n\nI'd like to think that my mother just didn't see it due to her failing eye sight, but the poop stain on my daughters bum was about the size of a thumb print and quite a noticeable dark green color. If I say something I risk her blowing up and creating a drama out of the situation. If I say nothing, I risk it happening again. \n\nAny suggestions?\nLeft daughter @ my mothers overnight, she came home with dirty bum. Do I say anything?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Ex-mormon here. Be glad you didn't stay in for 19 years. (shakes head at self in the mirror)\n",
"prompt": "I'm so glad I got out of that cult before they wrapped their tentacles around me. To think I was dumb enough to go for half of a year almost makes me sick...\nI just found out my neighbors' church practices gay conversion therapy..."
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
1,
1,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "I was gonna say meet your tinder dates in bars and have the bartender *really* check their ID, but I forgot the UK folk can drink at 18. Issa dangerous game, fam.\n",
"prompt": "So I swiped right on and matched with this girl on tinder who had on her profile that she's 18 which wouldn't have been an issue as I'm only 20 and some of my mates in the year below me at Uni are still 18 because they won't turn 19 until August. As well as this I'm in the UK and the age of consent is 16, we can drink alcohol at 18 etc. I also had no reason to suspect this was a lie as she looked the age she said she was, probably even looked a bit older than I do because I look quite young.\n\nBut then I check her bio to see if we have much in common and she's wrote \"on the edge of 16\" indicating that she's 15. I'm absolutely shocked and disgusted. I feel like a pervert even though I've done nothing wrong. Obviously I'll definitely not be chatting to her now I know that. \n\nPlease don't lie about your age if you're under the legal age of consent. It's pretty selfish and the older person can get in loads of trouble. \n\nAlso people who are of age, don't be complacent and get swipe happy on Tinder. Always check their bio.\nUnderage girls who lie about their age on Tinder- Don't do it."
}
] |
[
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "So first they chicken out with the intended lesbian relationship, and now for the sequel where they had another chance after becoming an established series, they still don't give us a lesbian romance and just have a recurring joke that Beca is sexually confused.\nHooray. :(\n",
"prompt": "I just went to see Pitch Perfect 2. Beca is hilariously sexually confused for the female lead singer of a rival acapella group. \n\nShe tries to insult her throughout the movie and she's like \n\nBeca: \"YOU'RE PHYSICALLY FLAWLESS... wait...\" \n\nBeca: \"I-I HATE YOU, YOU BEAUTIFUL SPECIMEN.\"\n\nBeca \"Uh... UH... WELL, YOUR SWEAT SMELLS LIKE CINNAMON.\"\n\n*girl touches Beca's face*\n\nBeca: \"*breathing heavily* YOUR HANDS ARE SO SOFT\"\n\nOther girl: \"Beca r u okay?\"\n\nBeca: \"SHE NEEDS TO STOP MAKING ME QUESTION MY SEXUALITY AND I JUST NEED A COLD SHOWER OKAY\"\n\nI was dying hahahhaha.\nFun Pitch Perfect 2 spoiler!!",
"rejected": "I saw the first movie for the first time about a week ago, and I spent the entire time expecting the redhead (Chloe?) to admit her undying love to Beca, because she's ridiculously touchy-feely with her. You even see her admiring another girl's butt at one point. She pretty clearly seems to be into girls.\n\nThere's a scene where everyone is admitting secrets to the rest of the group, and everyone expected the obvious-lesbian to tell them she was gay. Of course, she's already out and half of the group just didn't know it, so she told them something else. After that was Chloe's turn, and everything is set up just perfectly for her to come out as bi... But no, she just has nodules on her vocal cords. Damn it.\n\nAnd then they never address her infatuation with Beca, and I finished the movie completely frustrated. Sigh.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "A little before 2. One picked up on it quickly (with the bands) while the other used them to stab his food for many years. \n\nMy SIL is Asian and her youngest and my oldest are only 2 weeks apart. My youngest is 18 months younger. The kids all grew up together and we introduced our kids the same time she did with her youngest.\n",
"prompt": "We do tons of Asian foods at home. I want my kid to use chopsticks, but at 1, he obviously isn't anywhere near coordination levels to use them. So when is it a good time to introduce them?\n\nI think fake (ones with rubber bands on top) won't actually help him learn, and they aren't used in China or Japan that I have seen.\nHow early did you introduce chopsticks?",
"rejected": "My daughter has been using them since she was 2. She doesn't have the dexterity to use them without the rubber bands, but they do teach her the motion of pinching. We're an Asian household and we've always used them with kids.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "hello irish person (never met an non irish person that says Mammy) \n\nI've heard grown women talk about Mammy and Daddy - I remember once at Dublin Airport, a D4 type family coming into the bar and the woman saying \"and a pint of Guinness for daddy\" when she was putting the drink down... to a 90 year old man. \n\nNo harm in it - but mostly it would be Mam and Dad. May also be anectodotal, but it would be more women I'd hear saying \"mammy and daddy\" when they're grown.\n",
"prompt": "Just curious, is it weird for grown adults to call their parents Mammy and Daddy even if that’s what they’ve been calling them forever? Also is calling your parents by their first names disrespectful?\nMammy and Daddy",
"rejected": "I say Mama and Daddy.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "B.. Bb.. But.. How do I know how to address you/treat you if I don't know your gender? /s\n\nTbh, I live in China, and whilst my passport says F, nobody checks and just looks at me and assumes male\n",
"prompt": "We don't display legal sex on school IDs for high schoolers or college students, so I don't see why there's any reason to have it on driver's licenses or state IDs. All it seems to do is cause trouble for transgender people or cis people who don't look like their sex and serve as I guess an unnecessary ornament? Why can't we just stop printing it on IDs?\n\nIn general, I don't think there's any particular reason to require people to state their legal sex in most circumstances, y'know? Your school, work, etc. just doesn't need that info.\nAll IDs should just... not list your legal sex on them",
"rejected": "I feel the same way about job applications and social media sites. Why is my gender so important to everyone? (Ditto for race/ ethnicity. Why is that so important?)\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1
],
"chosen": "I’m also always trying to look a little butcher (I just gravitate towards very femme looks) and as a curvier woman I’ve found that a good futch look on me is high-waisted jeans, a tank tucked in, an open men’s button-up, and a belt I stole from my dad. Men’s clothes are not made with boobs in mind so wearing them in this style makes them look better on me.\n",
"prompt": "Hi all,\n\n​\n\nLongtime lurker, but you've seduced me with your awesome posts. To make a long story short, y'all are fashionable AF and cute. All of you. I need your sage wisdom now on shuffling my femmey-femme wardrobe over to something a little more MOC. \n\n​\n\nAnd we're talking flower prints, dresses, flats, jewelry, the works. I've been super into my FOC look for about 5-6 years now, but tartan skirts and blazers with those elbow patches are starting to call my name; I ~~secretly~~ really have a huge thing for button-up shirts, sloppy ties, and leather gloves. BUT-- I also hate waste and I've got a lot of pieces I think I can repurpose. I've got a local Goodwill I can hit up for stuff and our Walmart actually has some cool stuff, and I'm not at all averse to investing in good investment pieces that'll last a long time.\n\n​\n\nCan you lovely peeps give me any advice or ideas for making a wardrobe transition? On a scale of \"poofy fairy godmother\" to \"Vin Diesel\", I'd like to sit around a solid \"Cate Blanchett in a suit\".\n\n​\n\nThank you all for being a daily source of smiles, everyone! \n\n​\n\n​\nTransitioning to Futch/ Butchier Femme fashion on a budget?",
"rejected": "From a budget perspective I would highly recommend checking out your local thrift store. The Goodwill near me has 50% off (almost) everything in store twice a month, and I'll leave with a huge bag of clothes for about $20. \n\nThat's the easiest way to change up your wardrobe quickly in my opinion. And if you do that I'd love to see what you pick up! Good luck :)\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Kate McKinnon. \n\nGranted, you may need a bigger box\n",
"prompt": "A friend once asked me if you get a gift from the LGBTIQ community when you come out. I was like - sure do. It includes: a rainbow sticker, pair of doc martins, blue Levi's, white tshirt, box set of Ellen, all KD Lang and Melissa Etheridge cd's, ticket to Teagan and Sara, a voucher for a haircut, a cat, and the Pricilla Queen of the Desert DVD.\n\nWhat else should be added?\nThe \"Coming Out\" gift box. What else should be added?",
"rejected": "A frequent renter discount card for UHaul. And a Subaru alarm remote.\n\nIf you're trans, you get a choker, a jar of pickles, a jar of olives, and a CD of cute anime girl wallpapers as well.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "TIL lesbians are also pirates. (so many tatoo ideas! Also gold teeth and lots of ~~money~~ booty.)\n",
"prompt": "First to start off, this isn't a serious post. I just think it'd be fun/funny to hear some of your responses, so don't take it too literally. \nSo the scenario goes: you are in a position to broadcast to all queer ladies everywhere about one identifier (object, clothing, action, etc.) that would signify them as a girl who likes girls. Every queer girl would get one of this object/ know how to do the action so they could use them at their will. What would like this identifier be? \nI would chose a simple, twisted silver bracelet. It's simple, goes with everything, and it'd be fun and easy to flash if you want to let a girl know ;)\nIf you could make one queer girl identifier, what would it be? (Details inside)",
"rejected": "Bring back violets! Bring back violets! Violet tattoos, a violet pinned to your shirt or a chain used as a necklace or a crown, violet-themed jewelry, violet patterns on your clothes, doesn't matter. Everything related to violets is officially hella gay, but only we know. Best part: wanna know if your friend or acquaintance might want to be something more? Give her violets! They're cute little wildflowers, so you can pass them off as a friend gift if she's straight, but if she's not you can be sure she'll get the homo! No flaws!\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "All i can say is \"Justin Bieber.\"\n",
"prompt": "...you see an attractive guy and wonder what he would look like as a lesbian. I'm doing this way too often.\nYou know you're gay when...",
"rejected": "Thought I was the only one.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Rearrange the toys in different ways. Take half of them out and put them on a table for them. Make set ups that look as if someone stopped mid-play. Look up \"invitation to play\" ideas.\n",
"prompt": "I have an 18 month old, and a soon to be 3 year old. Both girls. They’re best friends and they play together really well. All day. \nBut they won’t play with their toys. They’re into everything else though. We spend a lot of time outside (they’ve done a number on the garden), and I keep their toys organized and so they’re appealing and easy to find. \n\nWhat else can I do?\nHow do you get your kids to play with their toys?",
"rejected": "I mostly just embrace the non \"toy\" play.\n\nRotating toys helps a bit, but my toddler mostly wants to play with random stuff. I figure if she's happy playing with stuff like scarves, spoons, bolts, wallets, dandelions, chopsticks, unplugged keyboards, and Amazon boxes, why not let her do her thing? I did rearrange stuff in the kitchen so there's a drawer and a cabinet with only toddler-safe items, so anything in there is fair game. She has tons of toys but they're apparently just not as interesting as my potholders, lol.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Leave. I know it's hard but once you get over the slump it's so fucking good\n",
"prompt": "alt account to protect my privacy... my regular account has a really recognizable username. whoops. anyways, here we go.\n\nI met my girlfriend over four years ago online. we entered an LDR and we met in person, and we moved in together because I had some terrible crap going down and stuff like that. That's the long and short of it.\n\nso we've had our ups and downs and I'm moving back home. At first I thought it was because I wanted to go to college back home (which is true) but I've noticed my girlfriend doing some REALLY PROBLEMATIC STUFF.\n\nFirst and foremost, she is NB, and prefers female pronouns. She's DMAB basically. This might give you some context when you know she has Asperger's as well.\n\nAnyways.\n\n* She says really problematic stuff, and passes it off like people just don't ~get~ her. Just today she called one of my best friends (mtf) a fucking *fuckboy*. She claims that she was joking... As an aside, when I made a joke about something regarding not watching a movie because of furries (which was a joke, I have a short attention span with movies) she not only PUT IT ON HER BLOG (she's an artist with a substantial follower count), shamed me for it, and made me feel bad about not wanting to see the movie. Then she proceeded to guilt trip me. **She apologized for calling my best friend that, but I don't think she really got it because she only apologized after I got pissed off... It's just a gross feeling sitting in my tummy**. My best friend didn't even do anything to her, like it's just infuriating.\n\n* I just made the decision to move back home on Thursday, and even then she hasn't really cared for me emotionally or physically even before that; it's just gotten worse since then. Like... I can take not getting laid, especially if she feels insecure about her parts. But, she's offloading a lot of her issues onto me. She keeps saying she doesn't like my taste (which is okay, I'm not down for sucking penis so it's a trade off I could accept). She just doesn't even touch me, and only connects with me emotionally if I'm upset. We hardly even hug anymore. I guess a lot of what's making me upset is her offloading her discomfort by taking it out on me, instead of talking to me about why she's uncomfortable.\n\n* We still live with her mom, and that causes a myriad of problems as well. We had a dog, and basically we're in the process of giving her up because she refuses to train her. Of course, my girlfriend takes this out on me! I don't understand the logic of this. I've gotten more passive aggressive jabs for not being able to train her. When I ask my girlfriend to teach me HOW to train her, it's just a lot of tripping over words and saying \"uhhhhh later\". Then MORE guilt tripping because I don't know what to do.\n\n* I'm an argumentative person. I'll give anyone that asks that! Whenever I'm arguing with her though, it feels like she's ALWAYS upset at me for being upset over something we could have fixed together prior to this. At one point it got so bad that she told me she would (basically) terminate the relationship if I kept arguing. It could be about anything and she would break up with me. That SCARED me, not because I couldn't live without her, but because of the fear of her just throwing me out for no reason, without trying to fix it with me.\n\n* Lastly, and this is more on the emotional spectrum then anything, but she just doesn't treat me like we're dating. We just had our 4 year anniversary, and she didn't even get me a card. We didn't do anything special. Like I get it, 4 years isn't important, but it was our first one spent together outside of the confines of an LDR. We're living together and it was our first anniversary \"together\"... That just extends to the rest of the relationship. Like we get food together, we do all that stuff, but she didn't even take the one special day of the year for us to try and do anything.\n\ntl;dr: sorry, I'm pretty whiny. Anyways, my girlfriend is really problematic in some regards and I think I'm in an unhealthy relationship. I'm at the point where I want to leave her before I go back home... I guess I'm looking for everyone's thoughts.\ni think i'm in a bad relationship...",
"rejected": "it's irrelevant whether she's autistic or not. it's neither ever a reason, nor would it be an excuse for such behavior. if i may judge from what you write, she is of questionable character. what i would like to ask you is what you are waiting for? you see the problems. you feel it's not right how she is treating you. what are you waiting for?\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "From Frozen: \"I'm never going back; the pasta's in the past\"\n",
"prompt": "For the last 30 minutes, my three-year-old has been singing the following over and over again, quite loudly and with considerable enthusiasm:\n\n\"For he's a chike fellow for he's a chike fellow, for he's a ch-iiii-ke fe-llll-ooow...show your candy why.\". \n\nAny attempts to convince her that those aren't the right words (\"For he's a jolly good fellow, which nobody can deny\") only result in \"stop being silly, Mommy.\"\n\nWhat songs have your kids gotten totally wrong?\nHilariously misunderstood song lyrics",
"rejected": "*show your candy why.* \n\nI wish I could but I don't know how!\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Yes! I specifically remember a moment in 9th grade where there was a lesbian couple holding hands and I was so disgusted by them. Now im a lesbian lol\n",
"prompt": "Note: I was raised Christian but am no longer. \n\nI read through my childhood (9/10 years old) diary a few hours ago and noticed an entry about homosexuals, I wrote that it was wrong etc. I found it hilarious because I turned out to be a lesbian myself. Was anyone else against the community at a young age yet turned out to be part of the lgbt+ community?\nWas anyone else homophobic as a child yet turn out to be part of the lgbt+ community?",
"rejected": "My situation is very similar—raised in a Pentecostal Christian household, and definitely grew up with some warped views about LGBTQ+ people. Case in point, I’m a newly hatched MtF trans woman (pre-HRT, etc.), and I feel truly comfortable in my own skin for the first time in my life. 🥰💗🏳️⚧️\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Oh my god. I hate it so much. The prospects on tinder in Auckland are slim for women, and it seems that at least 25% are couples seeking another woman. (No actual data to back this up). \nIt pisses me off and grosses me out. Each to their own, but I wish there was a setting to exclude couples. I wonder how many of those couples are fishing for a man to join them? Probably not many.\n",
"prompt": "... ever actually have any luck?\n\n​\n\nI have to speculate that sometimes the have success or they wouldn't keep trying.\n\n​\n\n(I shut down another one today, who said they'd \"make it worth my while\" if I would \"dominate her and her man.\" Firm no and suggested she hire a professional for that, and block. There might have been some profanity including in my response because the first line of my profile says NO THREESOMES.)\nDo the women and their creepy boyfriends looking for threesomes ...",
"rejected": "My friend just got a bumble for dating women and she says she’s been having an awful time about matching with couples looking for a unicorn or just straight up men! Somethings wrong with their algorithms. \n\nPersonally, I’ve never used a dating app to find a three sum. I think I’ve had better luck looking for thee sums because I talk to the girl first in a friendly, non hitting on manner to feel her out and then send the boyfriend in to actually show interest in her. Usually if they wanna fuck the guy, they’ll be down for me too. But a girl liking me never guarantees she’ll like or be comfortable with him and always seems like a bait and switch. However, I generally like being a unicorn so I might be better about spotting girls who would be okay with it.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "It was on a Ferris wheel. My then-best-friend and I, both 15 and super gay, went on with two guys we were good friends with and who were queer guys. I noticed at one point that hey, all The Gays are in this gondola! Let's all kiss and be super duper gay\n",
"prompt": "What was your first kiss like? I was sitting around last night thinking about my first gf and my first kiss and I just really wanna hear cute first kiss stories :)\n\nMine was a family friend I'd known most of my life. I was already having crushes on girls (was probably about...idk 11 by this time), but was very private about it. Her grandparents died and our family was invited to the funeral, and I am a super introverted, antisocial lady, so I had a walkman and was sitting in the back laundry room, and she wanted to hang out with me because everyone was too sad and wouldn't stop trying to talk to her. She wanted some time away from everything, so we sat and listened to music and talked, and then after a few minutes just sort of got quiet.\n\nThen out of nowhere, she just sort of kissed me, and I found myself kissing her back. We kissed for a few minutes, and then she left the room and my family had to go. I didn't really see much of her after that (I thin she might've been embarrassed or something) and a few years later when we were about 17, we started seeing one another again, really hit it off, started dating and both lost our virginity to one another. We only dated for maybe a year, but we're still great friends.\n\nAnyway, cute story time, go!\nCute Stories?",
"rejected": "We were lying in bed together and in a lull in the conversation she asked what I was thinking about. I said, \"kissing you,\" except I was really shy and not at all smooth so I got the giggles because who says something so cheesy? But then she turned me over and kissed me hard and I never looked back.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "User name checks out 👌🏻 welcome to the queer fam, bud.\n",
"prompt": "Oh man I have been talking to this girl for a couple weeks, we met online, she's the first girl I've ever seriously been interested in. I've only been with guys my whole life, but thought I just had a low sex drive. Anyway, we finally were able to be together recently and WOW girls are so sexy and soft and curvy and I just could not stop touching her! \n\nAnd I was, of course, very nervous about the giving part, and wondering if I was doing things right but it felt so normal and made me so happy to make her feel good. \n\nI'm not out to anyone yet, so I'm sharing here to yell from the Reddit rooftops, \"My name is puppiesnpizzas, and I REALLY LIKE GIRLS!\"\nLike a Virgin, touched for the very first time!",
"rejected": "Similar thing is happening to me right now. I'm seeing a girl & I'm completely different from how I was when I forced myself to date guys.\n\n​\n\nWith guys, I always got annoyed that they wanted to text and see me all the time, and I really didn't like kissing.\n\n​\n\nNow, with a girl, I really look forward to texts from her, wish I could see her more. Even if I saw her two days earlier and we can only make time for an hour at the end of the night, I'll happily make time for her. With guys, I resented having to make time for them, even seeing each other once a week felt like too much. And kissing? I literally went home from dates texting \"why don't I like kissing.\" But I actually love kissing her now, and holding her hand and making out and all the things I thought I didn't like.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Gender based education of any type is stupid. If a girl wants to learn how to be a mechanical engineer then bloody well teach her to be a mechanical engineer.\n",
"prompt": "I want to know how this community feels on the matter. For some reason this has become a debated topic.\n\nPersonally, I would have loved to be in boyscouts. I hated girl scouts (for the short time I was in it). I simply wasn't interested in crafts or learning basic house-wife skills. Athough I understand how necessary these skills are, I didn't care about learning how to sew or make an oven mitt when I was a kid.\n\n I'm glad they're including girls. I hate the idea of splitting kids up and having them do activities based on stereotyped gendered constructs. I think kids should be able to explore whatever activities they're interested in, regardless of their gender. I genuinely don't see an issue with this change.\nGirls in Boyscouts",
"rejected": "I'm from Canada and girls have been in scouts since 1998 (it started regionally in 1993). There was no issues (that I could tell)\n"
}
] | 4
| 752,001
|
Long story short, it's been coming up in some of our circles at home. But, in a manner that makes me question the honesty of it. Beyond even the "personal" issues of some of the participants.
Really, I don't have much of a problem with the people who use these sorts of social issues as a hammer to assert control over individuals. For them, there's not much you can do to stop them. I have noticed that more bothersome for me, they are having a really easy time manipulating many people. Specifically younger people. Conversations that are based around nothing other than text, hyperbole and arguing. We of course know all this already. The goal is shame, guilt and control.
But over the course of the past few months I have noticed the same thing happen twice. The seeping of these "social" issues based on hyperbole and strawmen begin criticizing actual, living breathing projects. To the point where the most successful anti-racist projects are attacked, ignored from a factual basis and look like a Tumblr argument online. These individuals end up having some support, from people who feel like the charge of "racism" or "not doing enough" or "privilege" is meaningful enough to denigrate anything.
And this isn't cherry picking, these are real life things. Even to the point of the charge on an individual that they "don't do enough" presumably because...they don't post enough anti-racist articles online. This is not a joke. This was a serious suggestion. And of course, these are not personal or even acquaintance friends.
This is a disaster. The fact is, if you are the cops or private groups you could have no problem if not outright destroying and splitting successful projects at least sectioning off a large group of guilty supporters. Has this been happening in your town? It's happening in mine.
This is actually a pretty serious post, it's not a joke when Tumblr anti-racism actually begins impacting anti-authoritarian anti-racist organizing in real life. I really don't even know what else to call these politics or social issues. They aren't identity politics.
For extreme lack of a better phrase, "tumblr politics" having troubling implications lately. Honest discussion
|
I've noticed your typical anti-racist tumblr blog or twitter tends to be run by some liberal white person who appropriates the rhetoric of the far-left while simultaneously stripping it of all it's actual content. Then of course that type tends to deride any argument in favor of anything even remotely radical as being an expression of privilege.
I suppose a great example, during protests in Oakland last December I saw a lot of people complaining about "white anarchists" on social media. This is stupid for a number of reasons, least of which was the fact that not everybody smashing up that cop car was white. If anything the white liberal complaining about radicals "hijacking" the movement is probably more privileged and condescending then anything some black bloc person got up to. It rests on the idea that black people are innocent democrat angels who would never do anything to hurt anybody else or their property. Which is bullshit.
If anything I find it rather weird how many white people I know...how do I put this?...fetishize black struggles and turn them into something they aren't. In fact liberal tumblrites obsession with all things black is kind of odd. I really don't know how to describe this, but it's almost like this type hates the culture they live in so much that they turn around and transform black culture and experiences into some sort of innocent, beautiful, wonder devoid of anything they don't like. Which is just fucking weird. I mean, I hate my culture plenty but that doesn't mean I gotta pretend I'm somehow not white or that I'm above it, nor does that mean I gotta (like I said) fetishize black people
That isn't to say they shouldn't care about racism (they should), but it almost seems like they're constructing some sort of totem to their own progressiveness rather then speaking truth because it is truth, if that makes any sense.
To go back to Oakland, one of the stupider moments I remember seeing on livestream (all the fun of civil unrest without the exercise!) was some kid trying to
|
Do you have any examples cause I'm just writing this off otherwise, you sound like every other reactionary lamenting SJWs.
|
[
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5
] |
This person likes social sciences.
This person dislikes entertainment, humor.
An observant, skeptical, and politically engaged individual who is critical of mainstream social justice movements, especially those perceived as performative or lacking in substance. They are likely to engage in debates and discussions about social issues but are wary of individuals who they believe exploit such discussions for personal advantage.
|
[
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "He didn't consent to going full-on political. Why chide him for it?\n\nI was actually surprised by the Blexit thing, until I heard that he just got someone to help with the design.\n\nBad move by Candace. Then again, it's the first targeted political movement at trying to stop the (D) chokehold on Black Americans.\n\nBound 2 have challenges.\n",
"prompt": "What do you think prompted his statement?\n\nI don't think he likes getting boxed into a particular set of beliefs. I think it pissed him off a lot of people started saying he's right wing and conservatives just because he supports Trump. \n\nWhat do you think?\nHow do you guys feel about Kanye?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Kind of. As long as we have wishy washy borders we need ICE, whether you want to call it \"ICE\" or something else. The police won't help, the liberal states have made that clear, and it's not the place for military force. They haven't \"gone rogue\", they are following new orders is all. \n\nOnce we have strong borders and have eliminated the politicization of those crossing illegally we can probably scale back since we will have cut off much of the problem at the root. But we are not even close to being there yet. I'm all for MORE ICE at this point, until we establish parameters that everyone is playing by.\n",
"prompt": "Hear me out. ICE has literally nothing to do with any legislation, they are simply a body of people employed by the government to enforce the government's legislation. \n\nAbolishing ICE does not change the law, it would not stop deportations, it would not have stopped child separation, etc. Abolishing ICE simply means that regular police, the military, etc may be asked to contribute towards various responsibilities that used to be ICE's. \n\nIf you want to allow illegals to enter the country without fear of deportation then that's called changing the law. \n\nAs such, it is my opinion that anyone advocating for this solution has proven themselves to not be worth listening to. How do you guys feel about this? Change my mind?\nDo you think the Abolishment of ICE is a litmus test for bad faith and stupidity?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Kind of an elitist mentality. I suppose public school is the floor of education too.\n",
"prompt": "Friend who is a physical therapist but a center Dem says \"I respectfully disagree to a degree. Medicare is the floor of insurance and giving everyone that will just lower the floor unfortunately.\" What to say in response?\nHow to best answer this opinion about m4a"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Biden feels kinda safe in that lineup. I'm wondering if this debate might see Bernie and Liz clarifying their positions and how they separate similar policies with socialist or capitalist solution.\n",
"prompt": "To call out Biden's lies about Medicare for All would be nice.\nI was kinda hoping for Sen. Sanders to be paired up w/ Joe Biden next debate..."
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "This issue is definitely difficult to parse. On one hand there are leftists who oppose US intervention into syria, but on the other they might also be actual Assadists. We have a similar problem with the Students Against Israeli Aprthied group on my Uni's campus. While there are some people that are against the oppressive israeli government, we regularly attract antisemites.\n",
"prompt": "Why do I keep running into ardent leftists, even radical ones, who are adamantly pro-Assad?\n\nCan someone please clue me in because this seems bass-ackwards as hell.\nWTF is up with leftists and Assad?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Sure, but only if they look at all the data on violence (not just guns), especially demographics, location, IQ, and family status. If you look at the numbers we do have for violence it is super concentrated in just a few counties/urban areas. \n\nMy concern would be that the media is very obviously anti-gun. If the CDC collects data, it can then be misrepresented in order to support a nation wide policy rather than addressing the actual problem in those areas where there is a problem. If the data is only collected about gun violence than the solutions presented will all be gun control (which is kind of the goal). \n\nWe do have a problem, but guns are just one small facet of said problem. Unfortunately the root cause may be something most people have difficulty in dealing with or admitting.\n",
"prompt": "I think we all agree that gun violence needs to be curbed. But there is a lot of disagreement about what the best approach for this is. So do you think that the American government should encourage (by funding or otherwise) a study of gun violence by CDC? AFAIK currently they are strongly discouraged from doing so, but I don't understand why, since that could lead to a solution to this problem.\nDo you think the CDC should study gun violence?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Does anybody feel like Bernie owes it to the people who have put their own time and money into helping the campaign to run as an independent if he doesn't get the Dem nomination?\n\nThere seem to be many independents who have not been able to vote for him, and the dems who have already voted for him would probably vote for him again.\n",
"prompt": "At this point, I'm more afraid if Hillary as President than Trump. If she wants to play games with our election, then she gets no points from me. I'm sure I'm not in the majority with this, but I'm not going to allow her my vote when they worked so hard to avoid Bernie from getting it. I feel cheated and I don't care if Trump gets it anymore.\nThis election is rigged for us on the dem side. Therefore if Hillary takes the nom, I'm not voting dem. I'm sorry, I just won't."
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "is that likely?\n\ncan't speak for Iowa, but based on my experience living in rural PA, school only ever got cancelled during the winter if the snow was over the 1st graders' noses.\n",
"prompt": "We keep talking about the weather like its a bad thing. It's a really positive thing for young voters. There's not really an excuse to say that you can't because its a school night or because you have to do homework. There's a blizzard coming literally a few hours after you caucus. Go make history and know that you can sleep in! :D\nWhy has no one brought up the fact that there's likely to be no school on Tuesday?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Almost all media (in the west) is influenced by white supremacism, just by virtue of being created by people who are steeped in a white supremacist society. Pointing out obvious examples is a fair criticism. Fantasy worlds are almost never exact copies of any time period in the middle ages (which wouldn't make for all that exciting a read tbh) - they absolutely can include more PoC and have it make sense. In some cases it would make more sense - some fantasy writers will have their regions have well established trade relationships with regions (usually southern) populated by darker-skinned people, but somehow cultural mixing barely occurs? And somehow black people etc almost never become main or important characters for very long, if at all? Though I don't read that much fantasy any more, so it might be improving. But I think it is notable that many of the most popular fantasy works are whitefests, and I'd sure love for that to change.\n\nIt's a pretty complicated topic all in all, combining the history of race in the west and the history of a genre of writing that by nature glorifies our favourite imaginings of past times.\n",
"prompt": "Some time ago, Star Wars actor John Boyega called out Game of Thrones and the Lord of the Rings for a lack of racial diversity. This led to lots of discussions. Some people argued that since those media franchises are based on Europe during the Middle Ages, it makes sense for there to be little to no people of color. Others argue that fantasy has even less of a reason than others genres because fantasy writers can add people of color, without having to worry about being realistic or anachronistic or historically accurate or what have you. I remember one article saying that it doesn't make sense if one could accept dragons in Game of Thrones, but they think it wouldn't make sense for their to to be black people in prominent roles, and while there were black characters in Game of Thrones, they didn't play a large role in the series, and they are kind of stereotypical, specifically and subservient positions. But then again, there are also people who would argue that just because someone is writing a fantasy novel or a book or TV show or movie, that doesn't mean that you have the ability to write whatever you want and achieve willing suspension of disbelief. It seems as though the answer to this question might not be so clear.\nMedia representation of people of color and diversity and inclusion in the media: does the fantasy genre have even less of a reason to be non-diverse?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Is there any chance Bernie could win South Carolina?\n",
"prompt": "Hi everyone, \n\nI'm a field organizer at the Reno campaign office and this is a call to action. The political revolution needs you. \n\nWe need an amount of canvassers that has never been seen in Nevada. Now is the time for not only Nevadans, but for anyone in the surrounding states to help lead us to victory. The western states of California and Oregon; I'm expecting something big from your regions. We are the stronghold of liberals in a sea of surrounding red states. The caucus is in 4 days and we only have 3 days to get voters informed. The last poll had both candidates in a dead tie, so if we can organize a MASS movement to help Bernie on Friday, that alone would put us into victory territory. Equally important to winning Nevada is furthering Bernie's momentum before SC. Nobody wants to be on the losing side when they vote, so if South Carolinians see that Bernie is gaining, people would be much more likely to vote for him if they are on the fence. Let's show the country that the NH result was not a fluke. This man has fought for US for the last 35 years in a system that despises outsiders. He was strong for us, but can he count on us to do the same in return? We need you. We can push the scales in our favor through the most powerful resource our campaign has- people power!\n\nEven if you have never been involved before, now is the best time to help. The Iowa caucus was decided by 6 votes. Here in Nevada we actually draw from a deck of cards and the highest card gets the extra delly. We cannot allow any draws. We need record turnout in a state that is not familiar with the system; that means we need a lot of help to inform and inspire people the day before. I WANT A LANDSLIDE VICTORY. DO YOU?!\n\nGo to berniesanders.com/nevada to find the closest campaign office. The addresses should be on the website, but phone numbers may be missing. Please call us at the Reno office if you can help, or if you want to go to any other location in northern Nevada. We want to facilitate you. Please call us at (775) 857-7104 and our address is 1155 West 4th Street Suite 121 in Reno, 89503. \n\nYou can also get someone to host you if you sign up on berniebnb.com and tinyurl.com/renocanvass.\n\nCall us. Come to us. Change this country with us. Be part of the revolution. Enough is enough and the establishment politicians must be sent a message by electing the people's politician.\nWINNING NEVADA"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Basically, Reddit isn't representative of the real world. Bernie does have the most supporters on Reddit, but Reddit isn't a good metric to judge overall support because Reddit is comprised of mainly young, white Liberal leaning people - that also happens to be the majority of people you see at his rallies. \n\nA better conclusion is that he has very strong support of young white liberals. The \"can he win\" question comes into play because he doesn't have the same level of support with other demographics yet.\n",
"prompt": "I just find it funny that the candidate with the largest Reddit subscriber list, has the most people asking if he can win. Also for the candidate with the most \"assertive\" fan base (saying this based on response to Bernie posts Reddit wide), it seems weird that they also have the most insecurity (to ask \"can he win\"). \n\nWhat gives?\nDiscussion: Bernie has the largest Reddit subscriber base of ANY 2016 CANDIDATE , but so many people keep asking \"can he actually win\""
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Because I'm not that well read yet (though I'm trying to remedy that) and the more educated I get, the less decided I've become.\n\nI'm opposed to the state and private property through and through, that much I know. I really like the market anarchists' laissez-faire critique of capitalism but don't really buy into natural law and find a lot of their revolutionary ideas a bit fanciful. I share the post-left/ultra-left disdain for reformism and their skepticism toward nat lib and \"workers\" organizations, but find them both a bit nutty, otherwise.\n",
"prompt": "Are you in between 2 ideologies? Do you choose not to label yourself on purpose?\n\nI tend to switch between Market Socialism and Capitalist Social Democracy every now and then. My political knowledge is still budding. Although I am a SocDem 75℅ of the time\n[Undecided Folks] Why are you indecisive about your ideology?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "I'd say they have the same characteristics as other hierarchies -- religious ones, for instance. Bakunin himself in *God and the State* hinted at the beginnings of a radical anti-hierarchical critique by identifying the similarities between the tyranny of the state, of capital, and of the church. I don't know of that much anarchist critique of militaries specifically, rather than as merely a component of state tyranny.\n",
"prompt": "I found myself arguing with a soldier on the internet (I know, I know...) He was an enlisted man in the US Army, and had absolutely no class consciousness, quote: \"Class consciousness? This is the USA, not Tsarist Russia\".\n\nThis left me wondering, are there any parallels between the rigid authoritarian structure of the army and the (almost equally) rigid and authoritarian structure of the capitalist business model?\nIs it appropriate to do a class analysis of the \"fighting class\" (or whatever you want to call it), and can they be incorporated into the class struggle? Or are they also proletariat, with an unfortunate job? \nPlease discuss your thoughts.\nRed Army"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "They actually started a new sub which got rid of the shit you talk about. The reason for r/anarcho_capitalism harboring far right users is because namely it's a political sub which has a lot of apologism for systematic issues - poverty, racism, sexism, etc, and because of its lack of moderation. You spend enough time in there and a lot of the users who get upvoted using that kind of language and all that will admit they aren't ancaps. True anarcho capitalists are ideologically pretty close to us imo, despite being (in their eyes) ostracized by the left in terms of identity politics. I think they are on the road to becoming socialists, at least the ones who don't like the fact that society is incredibly stratified. \n\nFor now though, r/anarcho_capitalism is just another sub NRxs and fascists can use and blend in to a degree.\n",
"prompt": "Okay, so I'd consider myself the LAST person to want to post about these people, but this is a curious development I'm noticing. \n\nTo me, it seems like anarcho-capitalists are increasingly cozying up to fascists, alt-righters, Trump supporters, etc... basically, straight up authoritarians.\n\n\nI've never perceived anarcho-capitalism to be all that anti-authoritarian to begin with, due to the continuous support for capitalism, but I've always given them the benefit of the doubt, just realizing that my analysis goes a bit farther. There are many I've met in the past that have been chill people, in spite of some theoretical differences or misunderstandings I feel they have about my own anti-capitalist views.\n\n Regardless, can anyone explain what is going on? \n\nTo me, it just seems like they are dropping all pretense of being anti-authoritarian and seem very willing to make appeal to or sympathize with fascists. \n\n\nI am noticing many of them are adopting the 4Chan rhetoric--calling people \"cuck\" over simple disagreements, for example.\n\n\nIt really just doesn't make sense when they constantly try to appeal to leftists as well by playing up the whole \"anti-authority\" schtick.\nYet another an-cap related post"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "That is an incredible oversimplification. When investigators hear conflicting reports they don't automatically charge someone for lying. They investigate in order to determine who is telling the truth.\n\nProof is very relevant. A sworn testimony isn't proof. It's just a testimony. There needs to be supporting evidence. In your example, the coworker would be found guilty of lying under oath.\n",
"prompt": "I keep seeing people implore Donald not to sit down with Mueller because it's all a trap to get him to say something incriminating. What does that even mean? Do they think that Mueller is going to fabricate evidence? If they actually believe that, it would compel him to speak even more, to be on the record disputing fraudulent claims. It seems far more likely to me that his advisors are afraid of him telling the truth, especially considering reports that he can't make it through two questions in mock interviews. What do you guys think of Donalds absolute unwillingness to talk?\nWhat is a \"perjury trap\" except for a subject being caught lying?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "The free-trade policies of the EU has caused some damage to Eastern Europe. Greece, for example, has ended up in a financial crisis because the bureaucrats in Brussels have just enough power over the Greek monetary policy to be able to demand Greece can only try to solve the crisis through austerity measures, and *austerity never works! Ever!* This is causing a death spiral (debt spiral?) where they have to keep borrowing money from Germany (and pay a bunch of interest, of course, further limiting the possibility of a recovery). There's a lot of profit for German banks in this, not very much for the Greek people.\n\nAs an anti-capitalist I oppose the EU for its lack of democracy and clearly profit-driven motivations, but that being said, I prefer a unified European Liberal pseudo-democratic oligarchy over a divided Europe run by nationalistic jingoists.\n",
"prompt": "In 2016 there was an argumment in the web that was like this:\n\nSmaller government, Sovereign state=Leave\n\n\nOn the other hand:\nSaying the EU is communistic because it wants to put people in prison for wrongthink is like saying the US is capitalistic due to its imperialism...\n\nBut lets get real, What is your final veredict on Brexit? Views on Teresa May Deal? Views on Corbyn? Views on UKIP position?\nWhat's your opinion on Brexit?"
}
] |
[
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "I don't have much to add but I can say that I feel like I have lost objectivity as to deciding whether he won or not.\n",
"prompt": "**Background:** My family are all Democrats. My Grandfather likes to say that Roosevelt (FDR) saved the country, he idolizes the man. Put another way my family voted in a bloc for Mondale for crying out loud. My family watched the debate together. My grandfather, grandmother, father, brother, sister-in-law, and my wife. Other than my wife and I, there was no committals voiced for any candidate either way.\n\n**Outcome:** Every single person present came away from that debate voicing that Hillary had their vote. Even my wife changed sides. I know we like to say on here that Bernie won, but in this, albeit anecdotal experience, Bernie lost. When talking with my aunt, who could not watch it with us, this morning she too stressed that Hillary had her vote. And another issue....my family votes. On every ballot.\n\n**Reasons:** Mainly the thing I heard was Hillary was presidential. She came across as the most knowledgeable. She had an answer ready for every question. Even the ones my family seemed to disagree on (ironically the one thing I agree with Hillary on) guns, my family liked her answer. My wife could not stop talking about Hillary's poise and grace. My brother and his wife did not like the idea of breaking up the banks at all. There were other issues: My grandmother did not know the difference between Democratic Socialists and Socialists, and seemed wary of it none-the-less after having it explained. My wife also said that anything not Economics related Bernie appears to be not as knowledgeable on. My grandfather loved the part where Hillary stated she was a progressive but would not let ideology stop her from accomplishing the job. Old people love pragmatism I suppose. \n\n**Takeaway:** I was shocked when I got on here last night and started reading about how everyone here thought Bernie had a wonderful night. It so contrasted with my experience. I know this post will not be popular, but we cannot go deaf in our own echo chamber. There are still more debates, and no one seemed ready to drink the kool-aid for any candidate, but it was unsettling.\nPersonal anecdotes from the debate. And why Bernie lost my whole family last night.",
"rejected": "My SO is undecided. I've tried not to gush too much over Sanders so she can make her own decision. She's not a huge Hillary fan and she's not going to vote for her just because she's a woman. But her opinion of the debate last night was that Hillary did well and Sanders sounded like he was repeating himself. \n \n It's frustrating to me because Hillary says the same, tired, canned responses I've been hearing from politicians for years. (I'm not part of the \"young\" demographic.) They spout these same general sayings that make people feel all warm and fuzzy, but there's no substance behind them. They flip flop on the issues only so they can agree with what they think is popular at the time. They're backed by big money and when they get in office nothing changes. It kills me that people vote with their feels and like these people because they look and sound the part. \n \nBernie Sanders is the first politician I've ever believed. He's not funded by big money and he's been right on the issues for a long time. Maybe he's not young, doesn't look like George Clooney, or sound as smooth as Barry White, but that's not what should be the criteria for President. I just hope more people can get past the superficial image of a President and understand what's really at stake with the issues in America.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Conventionalists may work, and explaining the difference between conventionalists, believing that the system works and it just needs tweaks, progressivists, saying that the system doesn't work but can be rebuilt from within, and radicalists, saying that the system doesn't work and cannot be fixed and must be replaced and rebuilt from outside.\n",
"prompt": "I was talking to some non-anarchist friends of mine, still very chill. They've been asking questions and I've been correcting them on misconceptions they had about it and began understanding it as something other than chaos as it's portrayed. However when talking to them i realize I'm struggling to come up with a term besides \"non-anarchist\" that isn't degrading towards them for their misconceptions. And although they're wrong on these misconceptions about us which are inadvertently insulting sometimes, I'm not trying to insult them back for being ignorant on it, I want to educate them. The term non-anarchist just feels weird slipping off the tongue.\nIs there a term for non-anarchists that isn't insulting?",
"rejected": "In the dispossessed, Le Guin uses archist.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "One where the government isn't involved. Except for crucial services like emergency and stuff.\n",
"prompt": "Obamacare is unpopular but it seems like the senate Republicans are having a hard time producing an alternative, and the President himself seems flexible on the issue--he'd has criticized the congressional bill a bit and seems like he'd be willing to work with the democrats if they weren't so opposed to him. What do you think?\nYour ideal healthcare system?",
"rejected": "The NHS. \n\nIt won't ever happen here, but it should.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "I'm sorry, but just who do you think was selling the \"White Man\" the slaves?\n",
"prompt": "Europe went through several cultural and technological revolutions to arrive at the modern day world. They brought that over to the Americas.\n\nBLM says that America was built on the back of slaves, but I'm pretty sure even without black slaves, America would still have farmed the lands, built the statues, invented electricity, invented Internet, invented computers, invented assembly lines, invented satellites, etc.\n\nZimbabwe was known as the bread basket of Africa... until they chased out and killed all the white farmers. Now they are a welfare state that relies on donations from the UN to survive. They can't even feed their own people, let alone export.\n\nWould African nations have a defense against AIDS or the common cold or other illnesses that American / Europeans developed cures for? Would they have learned farming techniques?\nWhat if Europeans never went to Africa or colonized it? Would the Black Man be better off in the 21st century without the White Man's intervention?",
"rejected": "I have another question - for how long will they blame white people? Europe recovered from hundreds of wars and always came back stronger, why couldn't Africa?\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Anarchism is the radical notion that other people are not your property. There's absolutely nothing about it which requires socialism or capitalism. Anarchists should be skeptical of binaries, anyway...\n",
"prompt": "Are there any forms of anarchism that don’t revolve around socialism/communism or capitalism? \n\nI’m a recent convert to the idea of anarchism and I still have a lot to learn but I’ve noticed that most anarchists are either communists or capitalists. I was wondering if there are other forms that don’t rely on those philosophies to function or maintain anarchy.\nAlternative forms of anarchism?",
"rejected": "I'm just anarchist. Nothing else. Non denominational. A \"Puritan\"\n\nDon't get me wrong, I have no issue with ancoms and ansocs, (fuck AnCaps obvs), but pure anarchy should be the basis of world \"order\". If someone doesn't want to work or contribute, so be it. That shouldn't be a death sentence and certainly not for financial ends. But most people do wish to work, and most of their waking hours if they are healthy. Some like manual labor, some like intellectual or artistic. Point being, humanity is naturally inclined to create and cooperate. Forcing it through money, taxation, formal Constitutions and legal codes, it's all unnecessary. It could happen to some extent in socialist and communist populations but for it to be sustainable it must be without hegemony. All anarchist subgroups agree that authority rots society and every living soul.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Yes and make it synonymous with the word “centrists”. It’s time for middle of the road aka republican lite polices to be abandoned.\n",
"prompt": "He needs to make it part of his stump speech. Close every rally with it, and say it at the debates. Biden/Hickenlooper/Delaney/etc are constantly talking about finding \"middle ground\" and if Bernie makes it one of his catchphrases, every time a candidate says it it will hurt them.\nPLEASE tell me Bernie is going to be repeating \"No Middle Ground\" every chance he gets",
"rejected": "\"No half measures\" would have been a better slogan, oh well. Middle sounds moderate and a lot of people like moderate. Nobody likes half when they can get the whole.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "It's complicated now more than ever. Within the Kurdish population there are a lot of older Marxist-Leninists and they are under the thumb of the United States government. They also seem to have a culture that is prone to cults of personality. And they haven't really moved beyond capitalism so much as they've collectivized out of sheer necessity during wartime. It's tenuous. But there are definitely great strides being made in terms of women's and minority rights.\n",
"prompt": "I've been reading something about it on Wikipedia, and it seems it's pretty much the realization of many anarchist ideals. Is it, or does it just seem like it is? If it is, why don't we talk a lot more about it?\n\n\n(Rojava=Democratic Federation of Northern Syria )\nWhat do you think about Rojava?",
"rejected": "It’s not perfect by any means, but it gives me hope.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "there haven't been any socialist countries since catalonia so where are you from where there was?\n",
"prompt": "So what will you do different from PSRS, if given the power.Why do you think people would support you and how would you avoid a totalitarian rule. Just hoping to start a debate with people that have different mindset from my own.\nA question from some one who's homeland used to be under socialist rule 20 or so years ago.",
"rejected": "First we should make clear that socialism is about ending private property, whether it be held by individuals, groups, or states. It has rarely existed in modern civilisation, despite claims to the contrary.\n\nYou won't be giving 'us' the 'power' - power will be held by you, and everyone you know. Society will be self-managed and horizontally organised.\n\nWhy would people support it? Why wouldn't they? They have nothing to lose and everything to gain. A society based on fulfilling needs and allowing human nature and creativity and ingenuity to flourish free from any authoritarian constraint.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Okay, but now you're making a distinction between speech and \"being heard\"(which is what I assume you mean by \"wokeness\" here). Freedom of speech and freedom to be \"heard\" are not the same thing, nor could it even be said that freedom of speech follows from \"wokeness,\" since it evidently does not based on your example.\n",
"prompt": "I don't know if anyone else feels this way but the podcasts are becoming predictable.\n\nI am aware his Waking Up app interviews many people but that's not the point. His podcast should also have a variety.\nSam's too focussed on politics/wokeness these days on his podcast. I realise it's an important topic but it's getting boring, he needs to mix it up with meditation and other positive topics.",
"rejected": "This sub is too focused on Sam criticizing wokeness.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
1,
0,
1,
0,
1,
0,
1,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "My hunch is that it’s mostly genetic. I think people who are less decidedly homo or hetero might be able to be influenced by cultural norms, but I think most people (well, me) felt attracted to the gender they’re attracted to in a very deep way from an early age. I had sexual dreams about my female classmates even in 1st grade, where I fantasized about cuddling with them\n",
"prompt": "A human's growth is determined by their environment and genetics. Can we as a society change the environment in such a way where we influence people's sexual orientation? or is this purely genetic?\n\nDo we have the same % of sexual variance now as we did 100 years ago or 1000 years ago? \n\nCan we reduce/increase this % with environmental factors or is it static?\n\nThis relates to Sam as he discusses determinism and behaviors in society.\nCan society determine/influence human sexual preference/orientation?",
"rejected": "Yes. Primates and quite a lot of mammals seem to just be plain old horny fucks and it is far more likely that we're all much more bisexually-motivated than current societies display in the open. We have a couple of modern tribal examples of very sexually free societies, one of which in my anthropology classes always stood out to me. There's this amazonian tribe where girls and boys between 14-20 years old basically a couple times a month depending on lunar cycles go down to the river and have a giant orgy. While no bisexual contact has been documented, it would not surprise me if there was some of that going on as well.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "I am myself, an equestrian, rather actually, a cowgirl. (Equestrian is mainly the English Division). I do western, and much more relaxed \"natural horsemanship\". I work with my horse, I communicate with her through body language while in the saddle, we play jumbo soccer which she enjoys a lot, and go on trail rides. I also use a lightweight saddle and a Bitless bridle, so there's nothing in her mouth. Although, most are completely okay with a bit in their mouths. \n\nIt gets cruel when money comes in. That $60,000 Dressage horse is most likely going to be put through rigorous and possibly controversial training in the name of winning the olympics. \n\nLike i stated above, I personally prefer a much more natural approach in which I work with my horse to build a bond, just like I would another Person. She has her opinions, especially when it comes to her hatred/fear of Blue Tarps, and I help to get her relaxed so that she is more comfortable and relaxed the next time we have to take those tarps to cover the hay.\n",
"prompt": "Specifically Green/Primitivist/Vegan anarchists. I personally believe it's cruel, but I don't think that people who ride horses are cruel, since it's so cultural. I also eat meat, so there's that.\nSo what do you guys think about Equestrianism?",
"rejected": "For nomadic people like Kazaks and the Mongolians, it is necessary given where they live.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Welcome! Do you have any specific questions? (You can use the search function to read previous threads on EPA, Climate Control and more).\n",
"prompt": "Hi folks- I am trying to learn more about the perspective of those who support Trump. I would love to have civil, educating conversations about your views on science and policy under the new administration. Coming here with an open mind and ready to chat.\nScience journalist looking to learn more about Trump",
"rejected": "I believe climate change is a real thing and that at this point it is indisputable. I think we should actively work towards renewable resources as our main source of energy. However, I understand human nature too and believe that necessity is the mother of invention. It is doubtful, to me at least, that significant strides toward alternative energy will be made until oil supplies get crucially low. I wish it could come along sooner as well. I think Trump's main focus at the end of the day is creating more jobs right here and right now. Contrary to popular belief, Trump is absolutely not an idiot. I think it's actually quite the opposite. I think he's brilliant. I don't think anybody could overcome the obstacles he did in his campaign and be an idiot. I also don't think Trump is a climate denier. He's said that the \"Chinese hoax\" bit was tongue and cheek, and wasn't meant to be taken seriously. I honestly believe he's more open to ideas than people think. I think if environmentalists could find a way to approach Trump without playing offense that he would be willing to listen. But what do I know, I'm drunk and it's too late right now. Good night\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Well capitalism was originally a very liberal and progressive idea (basically a shift in power from monarchies to the merchant class). I think modern conservatives support it because it is now the status quo system, and they support the status quo.\n",
"prompt": "Conservatives want things to stay the same, right? They realise the basis of capitalism is growth right? And this must be achieved through new technologies and ways of doing things. Unrestrained capitlism has, for example, been largely responsible for the development of social media, and it causing such a strain on our society currently.\n\nSo yes. I am confused as to how these two things go so hand in hand. My mom is a staunch conservative, and when I explained to her my worries about capitalism, that it was driving technology and change that wasn't good for us, she actually agreed. She didn't realise though, that the system will fall apart if growth stops - given the huge ratio of debt dollars to real dollars. Continued progress is the only way the system doesn't implode.\nWhy does conservatism and capitalism go so hand in hand?",
"rejected": "Loving capitalism doesn't mean you don't want to regulate it. Pure capitalism is cancer, and anyone who understands it knows that the regulation is fundamental to making it work for society, the way a string keeps a kite in the air.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Capitalism is a mode of production in which commodities and, thus, exchange is the dominant social relation.\n",
"prompt": "I think most of the cause of enmity between libertarian capitalists and socialists is simply a matter of semantics, and I want to put that thought to the test in this thread.\n\nI rarely have problems finding substantial common ground against \"capitalism\" when I argue with the (plethora) of socialists in my home country, Denmark. Once I explain my views on the market, we can often find some unexpected but non-trivial agreement on how to change the current economic system for the better. But, this only happens after we reconcile the term CAPITALISM as opposed to CAPITALISM. \n\nWhich leads us back to the title of this thread. In as unambiguous and precise terms as you can write it, preferably without ideologically esoteric words, what is your definition of capitalism?\n[Socialists] In unambiguous and precise terms, what is your definition of capitalism?",
"rejected": "Alright, interesting. Does your definition of the system have any internal morality that it must adhere to?\n\nCould a capitalist system include directly forced slavery, as in old-school cotton farms, or would that be a different system?\n\nHow about fraud? Could a capitalist make use of blatant fraud, or would that exclude him from the definition?\n\nMust every transaction in your definition of capitalism be (superficially, at least) free and unforced? Or would market forces directed by the threat of violence/blackmailing/etc be excluded?\n\nDoes your definition of capitalism include or exclude explicit political favors to market participants?\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Here are a few reasons you could use to convince people of the same demographic. \n\n1. Marijuana. Bernie is the only Democratic Candidate who wants to fully legalize it. Black youth and White youth both use at similar rates, but Black youth are much more likely to be arrested for it. And their sentencing tends to be much worse as well. Bernie's actions here would keep many young Black youth from being incarcerated in the first place.\n\n2. Death Penalty. Hillary supports it. Bernie doesn't. The death penalty is disproportionately given out to people of color rather than White offenders. And many people of color who have been put to death, evidence found later on that they were innocent.\n\n3. Private Prison Lobby. Hillary has taken private prison money for a long time, and only stopped halfway through this campaign because it looked bad. The Private Prison Lobby is historically pretty racist in terms of the clientele they want to fill their beds to generate revenue.\n\n4. Hillary would not say Black Lives Matter in the debates. Bernie did. Bernie named Sandra Bland and Eric Garner. Hillary did not. And Bernie has hired Black Lives Matter activists into his campaign. Hillary has not.\n\n5. Bernie has been more vocal on making police departments more diverse to represent the communities they serve, and to demilitarize them. Bernie has also said there should be a DOJ investigation into anytime a police officer kills someone while on duty. Wants to hold police who kill Black and Brown people more accountable. \n\n6. Bernie has an 100% voting record from the ACLU and NAACP. \n\n7. Bernie marched with MLK Jr. while Hillary was campaigning for Goldwater. \n\n8. Bernie campaigned for Jesse Jackson in the late 80's. He also campaigned for Obama in 2007/2008.\n\n9. Bernie's sat on a congressional committee as a congressman dedicated to addressing minority voter needs.\n\n10. Also, make sure to show them Hillary's racist ad against Obama from 2008 that aired at 3am one evening.\n\nEtc.\n",
"prompt": "Poll after poll and punditry after punditry I saw that Hillary is leading among women and people of color. I don't understand why -- are they more likely to be conservative Dems? Bernie (still) has a name recognition problem? Either way we need to find solutions and need to do it fast!\n\nWhen I see other women of color, what are some things I could say about Sanders' or Clinton's policy or character to point out their differences? Personally, it was Clinton's questionable behavior throughout her career that pushed me away from her, but I don't think I should approach other potential voters this way. I talked to some of my friends (women of color), and they seem to like a) Hillary's experience in politics and b) the prospect of having a female president.\n\nAny suggestions as to how I might get them interested in Bernie?\nI'm a woman of color. What can I do to convince more people like me to support Bernie?",
"rejected": "Look, most of us in this sub are white. I'm not sure that we should be giving you advice on how to relate to people of color. \n\nYou were convinced by something right? Tell them why you were convinced.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "You may be interested in reading \n\n\"What is it like to be a bat?\" by Thomas Nagel \n\nIt's intended purpose is to defend the idea of consciousness from reductionist arguments using a thought experiment involving trying to imagine \"what it is like to be a bat,\" but you may find the ideas concerning subjectivity and mental states to be useful as you work through defining gender.\n",
"prompt": "I know you folks get a decent number of questions like this, and I apologize. I searched through the old posts a bit but wan't able to find an answer I could understand.\n\nHere's my question:\n\nI don't understand what gender identity is. The way it's described/defined to me isn't something I'm able to comprehend. I've seen many definitions which, to me, just add to my confusion. Here are a few (many of which I realize are problematic, but I have a point, please bear with me): \n\n1) Gender ID= genitals/body. (If this is the case, I'm a woman).\n\n2) Gender ID is the body you want. (If this is the case, I'm maybe male, or maybe non-binary).\n\n3) Gender ID is the group you most relate to/identify with. (Then I'm male).\n\n4) Gender ID is the sum of your actions/role performance. (Then I'm non-binary).\n\n5) Gender ID is how you like to present. (Then I'm a tomboy, so female).\n\nBasically, I list these to illustrate that I find the topic of gender personally important because it has me quite confused/anxious/frustrated. However, I think mostly we would agree that in fact, none of these is correct. The definition I most see for gender identity is that...one identifies that way. So for example, a woman is a woman because that's what she knows herself to be. \n\nBut (and here comes the borderline TERF stuff, I apologize)...how does she know? How does she know what other women feel like, to know that's her category? In what way can one know that they're part of a gender without reliance on some \"outside\" thing (be that genitals or interests or clothing or desired body)? It seems that don't have this sense of belonging or identity, however my intuition is that this isn't simply cis privilege keeping me in the dark.\n\nI simply cannot understand this concept, but I figure if enough people try to explain like I'm five, eventually something will get through. Hopefully the result of that would be that I could be a better advocate, and also make some headway on my own frustration.\n\nThanks everyone.\nWhat Even IS Gender Identity?",
"rejected": "This stuff is too multifaceted and complicated and neurological to be coded to the degree that I think you're expecting.\n\nHow do you know what \"happiness\" is? Is your happiness the same as another person's? How do you tell the difference between being entertained, pleasure, being happy, or being content? But while you can't define it 100% and we don't necessarily understand it from a quantitative perspective, you pretty much know it when you see it, don't you? And that doesn't really change when you account for the fact that others may have a different way of processing a particular concept from yourself, and it doesn't really matter.\n"
}
] | 3
| 990,905
|
A pharmacist's belief against the morning after pill does not give him the right to refuse it to a patient. If he does, he should be on the hook for child support.
A boss's belief against birth control does not give him the right to ask women to tell them why they are on birth control.
Your religious beliefs against abortion gives you the right to not have an abortion. It does not give you the right to force others to adhere to your religious beliefs and not get an abortion, or the right to harass women outside clinics, send death threats to abortion doctors, or bomb abortion clinics.
Your religious beliefs against gay marriage gives you the right to not marry someone of the same gender. It does not give you the right to prevent others from marrying someone of the same gender.
Your beliefs in prayer does not give you the right to hold prayers in taxpayer funded public schools.
“Tonight, as you go to sleep beside your heterosexual life mate, you can rest assured, that all across your great state, a gay man or a lesbian woman is crying themselves to sleep in solitude and making your relationship stronger with every tear." -Stephen Colbert
Conservatives have a serious problem differentiating between "personal beliefs" and "right to shove your personal beliefs down other peoples' throats".
|
How about my right to not PAY for things I don't agree with? Want to have brith control? GREAT! Go buy some, don't expect me to pay for it. Want to have a loving relationship with someone of the same sex? Good for you, don't FORCE my church to recognize it. Want to kill your own children? Go for it! Don't use my tax dollars to do it. Any more of your problems you would like me to solve for you?
|
I'm with you 100%, but abortion doesn't really fit with you reasoning.
The right wing anti-abortion argument starts from the premise that the baby is a human life, and killing it is murder. You readily enforce your beliefs on a KKK member who wants to murder a black man because he thinks he's sub-human, don't you?
|
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
] |
This person likes finance, law.
This person dislikes gaming, entertainment.
A conservative, older male who holds strong traditional values and believes in personal liberty and fiscal responsibility. He is likely a business owner or a professional who has a clear stance on social issues and advocates for limited government intervention in personal matters. He may be seen as stubborn and inflexible in his views, but also as someone who stands firm on his principles.
|
[
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Transitioning?\n\nTwas always such.\n",
"prompt": "Just wanted to know what people thought about Leave.EU, a group set up specifically for the EU referendum moving into topics which aren't about the EU such as Islam in the UK. \n\nI understand they built up a large following via the ref but should they be allowed to just change the topic without having to change the branding?\n\nSurely if they would like to become a reduce Islam group, shouldn't they make it obvious with a statement or something saying so?\n\n\nWould it be cool for other groups to be free to do a similar thing? Such as the CND moving into animal rights or Shelter becoming an anti-Israel pressure group?\n\nWhat do you think?\nLeave.EU transitioning into an anti-Islam organisation. Acceptable?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Standing in at least three of the four regions and have Parliamentary representation.\n",
"prompt": "Whether we like it or not, it looks like the TV debates are here to stay. The current system for selecting parties (\"whatever the producers at the BBC/ITV/Sky feel like\") doesn't seem ideal, so how should it be done?\n\nNumber of seats? Percentage of the vote? Fielding candidates in a minimum number of constituencies and/or countries? Realistic chance of being part of the next government? Opinion poll standing?\nWhat criteria do you think a party should meet in order to participate in the TV debates?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Who is on the panel? I can't find it anywhere for some reason\n",
"prompt": "Its gonna be another one of those \"everyone shouts at right winger\" episodes\nQuestion time is going to be fun tomorrow"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Tbh they're not even a Remain party yet, they haven't said much on the Brexit front.\n\nIf what Chuka says - that they won't be setup until after Brexit - is true then they aren't going to be the Remain party.\n",
"prompt": "They didn’t do too well at the last GE. Are they tainted due to their support of the tories in 2010-2015? If so, how do people square that with the 3 Tories who’ve just joined the TIG, they supported austerity measures, tuition fee rises and the bedroom tax. \n\nPeople who are disillusioned with the two main parties & want to vote for a remain party, why not vote Lib Dem? What does the TIG offer you that the Lib Dem’s don’t?\nWhy is everyone ignoring the Lib Dem’s? With TIG standing on a remain platform why is no one in the media stating we already have a purely pro Remain party?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Tomorrow morning. She can't let cabinet Jon Snow her. Can she?\n",
"prompt": "When will she appear? 1/2 a mile of sovereignty to the winner.\nNext announcement at Downing Street prediction."
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "I dislike her because of the things she says and the way she says them; I do not care about the colour of her skin or that she is a woman. Yes a few people might be bothered by the latter two but I think most people base their views on the first two.\n",
"prompt": "I'm honestly curious as no one from any party seems to approve of her, think highly of her intellect, but she is undeniably highly influential to the Labour leadership? What is with the general disdain of her character, history and policies?\nWhy does everyone seem to dislike Diane Abbott?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "It sounds terrible, but I don't always think that people should have a free rein to have children.\n",
"prompt": "For example, if you generally align towards the Tories, what do you think is the best argument AGAINST a conservative government? If you're a socialist what do you think is the best argument against socialism?\n\nExtra points will be awarded to anyone who isn't facetious or sarcastic.\nWhat do you think is the best argument against your own political identity or principals?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "Either we crash out without a deal, or the UK will be fighting the European election.\n\nI doubt if the Conservative or Labour parties are looking at this prospect with any enthusiasm. The public will undoubtedly see it as a referendum on Brexit.\n\nMany leavers think the Tories have betrayed the leave cause, and will vote UKIP or Farage's Brexit Party. \n\nAnd many remainers think Labour have betrayed the remain cause, and will vote Lib Dem, CUK, or Green.\n\nSo expect both big parties to do badly.\n",
"prompt": "In 2017 TM called a GE, her team arrogantly claimed victory believing they could sweep up to 400 seats. Ever since the referendum all the chatter in number 10, parliament and Whitehall was about brexit. They were the ones that had to sort it out after all. However the issue was rather settled in the public eye. There wasn't much talk of remaining for a second referendum. Tory strategists overlooked this as in their world brexit was all the talk. They thought it would be a \"brexit election\". \n\nBoth parties were able to draw up vague and sweeping manifestos of implementing brexit and that was satisfactory in the public eye. The realities and complications of brexit hadn't hit home for the public, the issue was \"settled\". Which is why in 2017 Corbyn was able to say \"yes we will do brexit\" and then move on to campaign on the NHS, Education and fox hunting; then gain 50 odd seats as we know. \n\nEver since Corbyn and his top team saw a GE as their win condition. They thought they were being clever by not really tackling the brexit issue and dancing around it. However the reality has now hit the public. Brexit is the top issue by far. There is a visible crisis, rather than the crisis being in secret Whitehall and Cabinet meetings. Another GE *will* be a brexit election. Can Labour and Conservatives really draw up a consistent manifesto on brexit?\n\nCorbyn is still trying for a GE, after all he has a lot less to lose, but he is no longer touting it every few seconds like he was back in January. There are some Labour MPs who actually doubt they could win a GE.\nWhy nobody in parliament really wants a GE."
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "The Snoopers Charter was voted through the Commons long before May became PM. \n\nWhere is the opposition? Well despite the hyperbole on Reddit, the IP bill isn't all that bad. Google stores more information on you than whats allowed in this new bill. The only information thats being recorded is what websites you visit, not what you search, read, view, listen to, type or anything that can be defined as \"content\". Its also not the government that keeps this information, its your ISP and unlike Google, this information is deleted after 12 months. \n\nThere are certainly legitimate concerns about the Snoopers Charter but its not the Orwellian nightmare redditors have convinced themselves of.\n",
"prompt": "I think we all knew that May was going to use her serendipitous arrival as PM to attempt another push-through of this legislation, given that it's expansion was her personal crusade 3-4 years ago.\n\nBut where the hell is Corbyn on this? He's supposed to be the leader of the opposition, I haven't heard a peep from him or anyone in Labour/LibDems/SNP. Instead he's tweeting about the right to education, which we frankly all have, and race-baiting by calling Farage a \"rich white-man\", as if he isn't himself!\n\nNever mind the Lords, nothing more than the world's most overly-elaborate rubberstamp-cum-lapdog. \n\nIt's almost as though lefties and supposedly ex-marxists rather like the idea of more draconian power, control, and oversight of the minutia of the citizenry's individual lives. Don't want any trotsky-fascist counter-revolutionaries slipping through the net...\nWhere is the opposition to the Snooper Charter?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "He's a Thatcherite not the second incarnation of Mosley, this did upset the Albion crew.\n",
"prompt": "Looks like he just isn't racist enough for some. The replies to his tweet are as worrying as they are funny.\nRess-Mogg upsets his fan base"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "The \"dementia tax\".\n\nIt means my parents will get to keep their house.\n",
"prompt": "Seeing as there have been complaints about a growing left wing echo chamber in this sub, I thought it would be good to hear from the other side.\n\nI'm by no means a Tory, but I'm still interested to know what their supporters are most excited by from the manifesto.\nWhat Tory policy are you most excited about?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "50-100 years as the Japanese do. We need PR.\n",
"prompt": "Let's discount those who have eyes only on re-election for themselves at the next election.\n\nIt could be argued that constant change feeds growth, and stability leads to stagnancy and corruption. \n\nIf a policy gives immediate and incontrovertible benefit to \"the people\" for 10 years, but will probably lead to ruin in the much longer term is it still valid, because new science, technology, or process may well address the problems and solve them?\n\nOr should policy be directed two generations hence (60y +) so that not only may our children benefit directly, but they themselves have confidence in their security and some comfort?\n\nI suppose it's just another \"jam today\" variation ... or to bring it more up-to-date; \"the crack dealer at the school gates\" offering instant gratification over the education offered inside the classrooms.\nHow far ahead should policy makers look? 10 years, a generation or even more?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "I don't get this 'they were wrong all along' thing. Corbyn WAS terrible in opposition. He ran a strong campaign that caught everyone off guard but that doesn't make his poor showing before the election was called disappear\n",
"prompt": "At the Guardian in particular there are a lot of people - not just columnists - who if they were sincere would say this.\n\ncredit: Kevin Ovenden\n\"It's not just that I got it wrong over Jeremy Corbyn. I am very sorry that for two years I have, consciously and deliberately, twisted his words, contorted news stories and collaborated every working day in order to destroy him and drive him out of politics.\""
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "[deleted]\n",
"prompt": "Corbyn, Le Penn and the Chief of Staff of the armed forces are all on this morning.\nAndrew Marr discussion thread"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "For me personally:\n\nMildly right wing socially, (immigration controls based on salary, law & order, deporting non citizen criminals etc) \n\nLeft wing economically (scaling taxation, benefits capped to min wage, in favour of Nationalisation of transport)\n\nLiberal on freedom of speech, censorship.\n\n\nSensible green policies while preserving quality of life for motorists. i.e no fees for commuting in or out of a city built on the assumption everyone who works in the city lives within 5miles of it.\n\n\nThe tories are actually doing a really good job of keeping my vote.\n",
"prompt": "I dont believe in huge spending and do believe we need to reduce the deficit but dont think we should be cutting as much as the Tories. Police/Education/NHS should have increased spending and no cuts.\n\nI have right wing views in terms of death penalty in extreme cases but then I believe in Political reform and lords changing to a different system. Also think there should be more devolution to parts of the UK overall. \n\nI want Controlled Immigration and a system that allows people we truly need to come here in controlled and manageable numbers. \n\nI voted for Brexit which im guessing will get this a direct downvote for various reasons, I supported UKIP for a bit and it wasnt only due to Brexit they had PR Policy and free tuttion fees for Stem subjects that were interesting and a leader at that time I thought was okay but then lost interest in that party and him. Some stuff he said put me off quite a bit.\n\nRegarding the Enviroment I want to be as green as possible but if there is a big Economic benefit I think it should be debated at least to see if it would be worth it. \n\nIm honestly not a huge fan of labour at all they come across very snobbish espically when they used to promote people like Diane Abbott and Emily Thornberry. Tories are not much better but I feel like I was basically forced to support them due to Brexit and Boris is pretty much a joke. \n\nIm also pro monarchy which sways me more to right wing parties I guess. \n\nNow that is honestly over for me I got no idea who to really support labour have no visability or attention at all.\n\nI feel like this country really needs a middle ground party.\nDoes anyone else have a identity crisis when it comes to left/right and no real party for them?"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"comment": "No, people want electoral reform but clearly not enough to put it above things like the economy.\n",
"prompt": "So if either the Tories or Labour promised to hold an enquiry into electoral reform and then offer a fair referendum, do you think that it could be something that could easily win the 2020 election for either party?\n\nI think it might, because apparently 60% of people want electoral reform according to YouGov and if only one party offers a fair referendum of reform, people might flock to them. \n\nPersonally, I'd like a referendum to be done like this:\nDo you want to keep using FPTP: Y/N\nWhich system do you want, X/Y/Z\nIf either of the main two parties offered electoral reform, do you think they could win 2020?"
}
] |
[
{
"Preference Direction": [
0,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "**Nothing** the Democrats want will happen until they take back the Congress and they won't take back the house until gerrymandering and super pacs are no longer a factor. With that being said, we have a chance of reclaiming the Senate this year, so show up and vote in this year's national election.\n",
"prompt": "I'm a Bernie supporter. I am new. I apologize if this has been discussed. But let's assume Bernie becomes president. How does he push his policies through Congress and Senate? More deadlock? Obama couldn't do anything, so why should Bernie? Congress and Senate will still be Republican. Bernie will only make matters worse. I know some of you will say the we can change seats in Congress and ride the wave of Democratic-Socialism, but in my opinion, it ain't gonna happen.\nBernie supporters, please tell me how things will get done if he is elected president!",
"rejected": "The slogan that has been picked-up by Bernie's supporters is \"Not Me, Us\". Bernie has said time and time again that he cannot do this alone. Bernie will ask you to serve the cause over and over again during his presidency:To write your representatives in congress to support President Sander's policies, to visit the constituent offices of your representative. To march in support of the President. If a Democrat does not support the President primary that Democrat in the midterms. If a Republican does not support the President do everything in your power to remove them from office. \n\nHillary Clinton will not ask for you to be an activist. She is part of the problem, not part of the solution.\n\nMake no mistake this will be a fight but, a fight we can win. We finally have a leader who will fight for us, now we must pledge to fight beside him to make a better America for every citizen.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Why does he need to represent them in the parliament? People vote Sinn Fein and they don't turn up at all. UKIP supporters want us to leave the EU. Whatever brings us closer to that is fine.\n",
"prompt": "Mine would be \n\n1. The UK should be allowed to form trade deals without the EU.\n\n2. The CFP must end and British waters be for UK fishermen only. \n\n3. Our contribution has to be reduced. \n\nIf he can get these 3 things negotiated then I will join the IN campaign.\nWhat EU reforms could David Cameron get to sway your vote.",
"rejected": "And who actually enforces the single market without the institutions off the EU?\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Families from Wales but I've never lived there and was born in Reading - British makes sense to me.\n",
"prompt": "I remember the BBC poll which showed that everywhere but London had a minority of people identify as British. Where i come from (Far north of England) everyone says English or Scottish\nWhy is it mainly Londoners who identify as \"British\"",
"rejected": "Immigrants and children of immigrants are more likely to identify as British regardless of where they are in the UK. \n\nIt has been theorised that British is a more accepting, liberal identity than English, Scottish, or Welsh which usually have more expectations regarding heritage.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "will someone explain the context of the pitbull joke? I have stopped following Sarah Palin because I don't like to waste precious brains cells on that woman so I am totally in the dark with that joke. Did she say something about him eating dogs?\n",
"prompt": "\"Jimmy Kimmel got his start on a great show, The Man Show. In Washington, we call that a congressional hearing against contraception.\"\nObama really nailed it at the Correspondents' Dinner",
"rejected": "TIL Obama is legitimately hilarious. I'm sure he didn't write that all himself, if any of it, but his delivery was spot on.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "How exactly would requiring an employer, whether it's a religious institution or not, to play by the same rules and regulations, somehow prove that Obama doesn't support a separation of church and state? It really looks like you are insinuating that Obama somehow does not support that.\n\nI may be reading that wrong though and if I am then I'm sorry but it sure doesn't look that way from here.\n",
"prompt": "as a 25yo male that was raised in the mormon church till about age 18, a mormon president scares the living shit out of me. every news paper in the SF bay area has printed some variety of this article, and i ask you, r/politics... why in the fuck not. WHY IS IT NOT AN ISSUE?\nRomney's religion \"not an issue\"... WHY THE FUCK NOT???",
"rejected": "\"Those who say religion has nothing to do with politics do not know what religion is.\" Mahatma Gandhi\n\nI live by this mantra. I WILL judge a politician from his religous views. PERIOD. And it is perfectly legit. If you believe in magic underwear, I'm going to have to question your intellect and reasoning. Are you going to put that kind of faith into a decision of national importance? I need to know if you are going to be active in preventing a negative impact instead of just \"have faith\" that it will resolve itself.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "I think if Ron Paul got the nomination, he'd have a real chance of losing. The rest of the guys, forget it.\n",
"prompt": "I know everybody hates him now, but all the republican candidates are so loathsome and noxious and deserve to crawl around in a puddle of filth and snot and oil. Plus, he's an incumbent. Plus, he's ahead right now in the polls and nobody likes him!\nDoes anyone else, in spite of the negative hype, feel like Obama is going to win by a landslide in the next election?",
"rejected": "Yeah, our problem (conservative speaking) is like you say. No real candidates. Such as it will be. \n\nHowever, I do hope that if Obama is reelected he'll be able to use the extra time to try and flesh out his plans for turning the country around. As much as I don't like him, he's still trying to do his best for the country, and if he does it, then good for him. I just hope someone will do it.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "I hate Oracle WebSphere too.\n",
"prompt": "Reports are coming in that a very large crowd turned out tonight and more media attention is being attracted. I am sorry I could not be there with you but I will be on a bus Friday on my way to Liberty plaza, with several new attendees. Thank you so much for what you did tonight!\n\nKeep it up!!\nThank you OWS protestors - 10/6/2011",
"rejected": "This isn't going to end anytime soon. They need our support. Talk about it with your family and friends. Tell your kids about it. Talk about it in school and at work.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Mhairi Black.\n\nNot afraid to speak her mind.\n",
"prompt": "I thought in light of all the negativity and vitriol in the HoC at the moment, I thought I'd make a thread asking about people's **favourite** MPs in the house. Try and avoid talking about least favourites, I think we all know who some of the candidates for that are! I'll preface my answers by saying that I don't believe anyone is perfect, and the people I mention have all done and voted for things I disagree with.\n\nI'll kick you off:\n\n* Barry Sheerman (Labour (co-op), Huddersfield). This guy has energy. This guy has justified anger, and he wants people to know it. Strikes me as a very principled man (aside from things with the Iraq war...), and a powerful speaker. Also an MP for a town which I have a very unusual soft spot for...\n\n* Dominic Grieve (Independent, Beaconsfield). I may frequently disagree with his politics, but you can't disagree that he's very well spoken and knowledgable about the areas he gets involved in. He's been instrumental in the recent efforts to prevent a no deal. I think Grieve is what Rees-Mogg _thinks_ he sounds like.\n\n* Layla Moran (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Abingdon). Maybe showing bias here as she's my local MP, but as a relatively new MP (since 2017) she's really thrown herself into the job. She's very good at responding to any emails you send, she's done a lot for the constituency, and she's not afraid of making her views known, with regular interviews on newsnight etc. Only thing I **don't** condone is her comment about slapping her bf, something that should never be done.\nA positive respite—favourite MPs in the HoC?",
"rejected": "diane abbott. does fantastic work for her constituency. i am amazed at her strength to carry on when she faces such disgusting racist and misogynistic abuse. i would like to have mojitos with her.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "If you get any of the other three as Labour leader, then you get a decade of Tory rule *regardless of which party wins*.\n\nIt's better for all of us if the parties are different. It was a bad thing that Labour tried to be more Tory (1990-1997), a bad thing that the Tories tried to be more Blairite (2005-2010), and now, Labour risk repeating the same mistake. Mr Corbyn is what happens when they learn from history.\n",
"prompt": "This is really out of my own interest. I've read a lot of stuff on the different Labour leader candidates and I have to say Jeremy Corbyn's views are those with which I identify the strongest. \n\nBut one thing is niggling at the back of my mind. I've read a lot of anti-Corbyn stuff that says that he is so left-wing that he's unelectable, and if he gets in as leader that basically we'll have Tory governments for the next decade (and therefore having him in charge of the party is exactly what the Tories want). \n\nI'm not saying I support this view. Basically what I want to know is how those who back Corbyn counter this - or even if such claims are realistic. Couldn't it potentially be true? Would Corbyn rather be in \"perpetual principled opposition\" than actually be in Government? Isn't it possible he will alienate swing voters, securing future Tory governments? \n\nDon't get me wrong - I'd like nothing more than to see Corbyn in charge, but also I wouldn't want to live under the Tories until I'm 40...\nJeremy Corbyn supporters: What do you say to those who say if Corbyn becomes Labour leader that we'll be consigned to another decade of Tory rule?",
"rejected": "For most voters, elections aren't really about being too left wing or too right wing. They are about who you can trust, who is popular. There is a big excitement and hype about Corbyn already before he has even become leader. That is the kind of excitement you need for Labour to make big gains next election.\n\nMiliband never generated the excitement or confidence to win the election.\n\nBesides that he's got a much better shot than any of the other candidates.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "I'm leaving WF for a local credit union.\n",
"prompt": "My wife called Wells Fargo today to see if they would waive the $3 fee, seeing how we've been with them a long time and don't trigger overdrafts or anything. My wife got an earful from the rep.\n\nApparently, the rep got pretty rude when my wife told her we were unhappy with the fee. The rep said it wasn't the bank's fault, and blamed the government. She said the federal government capped overdraft fees, and so they just \"had\" to raise these fees to \"cover their losses\".\n\nThat clinches it, then. The bank does not view overdraft protection as a service for their customers. They view it as a moneymaking venture with profits which they are entitled to. (Besides, even if that logic made sense, *our account* hasn't incurred any overdraft fees, so they're not taking any losses from *us* - why should we pay to cover the \"losses\" from their other customers?)\n\nThe rep got a little anxious, too, when my wife asked about the procedure for closing our account, and actually started *arguing* with my wife, saying that it was pointless to move our money because \"other banks and even the credit unions are going to do it too!\" Maybe so, but they haven't done it yet. \"Ours is only $3, and Bank of America charges $5!\" Well, thanks for the tip, but we're not dumb enough to move to a *worse* bank.\n\nMy wife was awesome - calm, cool, and collected the whole time. But the rep wasn't. The impression I get is that there must be an exodus going on if they're getting short-tempered about people asking about how to close their accounts.\n\nWe pulled the trigger on moving our money today. Bye bye, Wells Fargo.\nMy wife called Wells Fargo today asking about the $3 monthly fee. Here's what the agent said...",
"rejected": "Wells Fargo is the worst bank I've ever dealt with. An error in their system erroneously caused fees for me, and they changed me for calls to correct the issue.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "All this food stamp business isn't about 'freedom' or 'dependence' or any other buzz-words.\n\nIt is purely a budgetary issue. No one in public office is suggesting that taxes should go up to fund food stamps or jobs programs. The suggestion is that we focus more of our current budget on social programs. It makes sense to do so for a number of reasons (especially feeding children). Countries benefit from healthy children and feeding people is almost always cheaper than letting them fend for themselves.\n\nMalnourished children are less successful adults. Malnourished adults are more likely to get themselves into trouble (which is more expensive to deal with than feeding them). \n\nIf Republicans were in the majority they would fund food stamps. They only oppose it because of partisan politics and rhetoric.\n",
"prompt": "His quote sets straight the Republican/libertarian perverted definition of \"freedom\". Too many of FDR's visions and warnings are still valid today, and his progressive iron will and foresight would have been a great asset in 21th century USA. I once hoped that Obama would have been the 21th century's FDR. I was, of course, mistaken.\n\nThat's why I laugh when people call Obama a statist, or liberal, or commie. FDR would be rolling over in his grave if he saw what Obama did, and is doing, as a Democratic president.\nTrue individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made. - Franklin D. Roosevelt",
"rejected": "Most modern Democrats have more in common with Central and South American socialist movements then with Kennedy or LBJ. These modern democrats always talk of giving government more power and control, and always in the name of the people. The irony of course is that the same people these groups claim to help tend to interpret the negative economic consequences of increased government distortion of the economy as the fault of private interests.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
1,
1,
0,
1,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "The monarchy is a cultural icon that an overwhelming majority of British citizens are in support for.\n",
"prompt": "Could Brexit be the kicker the British Republican movement needs?\n\nObviously plenty of people are outraged at the fact the Johnson is now proroguing parliament and at the fact that the Queen didn't step in.\n\nPersonally I agree with abolishing the Monarchy but I'm not too sure if this is actually going to be a kicker for the Republican movement.\n#AbolishTheMonarchy is trending on Twitter.",
"rejected": "Don't these idiots know that the queen couldn't step in? She literally doesn't have the power and even if she did, you can bet parliament would try to take it away within the week.\n\nWhat we need is a non-democratic element that actually has teeth.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "FTFY: \nAmtsanmaßung\n",
"prompt": "It is the behavior of someone who oversteps his authority and his office, by acting like he has authorities, that he in fact does not have. A few translations: \"presumption of authority\" \"unauthorized assumption of authority\" \"arrogance of office/authority\" \"hubris of office/authority\". And it is a crime. You can use it to perfectly describe the current state of affairs with the TSA, DEA, State Department, etc. Have fun! ;-)\nIf you like the German word Schadenfreude, I have another one for you: Amtsanmassung",
"rejected": "In legal English, the term \"ultra vires\" (beyond the powers) serves the same function.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
1,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Canada+ only applies to rUK. Not NI, which would remain in the customs union and single market.\n\nThat’s my understanding.\n",
"prompt": "I maybe way off here but looking at how things are going TM is stuck, she can't go one way without upsetting a sub group and has nothing that is going to get through Parliament.\n\nApparently the EU have already offered Canada+, ERG want it, DUP seem happy with it, big issue is that it means a hard border, but as things stand we are heading for no deal which would automatically mean a hard border anyway.\n\nI don't know if I am right in what I am saying which is why I am asking you guys, but is this option not currently looking the best without just coming out with no deal?\nIsn't Canada+ looking like the best option at the minute?",
"rejected": "The best option is the EEA. You only take roughly 20% of EU laws. These 20% are discussed with you before they are implemented. It's not true that you are a pure rule taker. Norway participates in negotiations before rules that impact them are made. UK could do that for 5-10 years and see how it goes.\n\nThen the remaining 80% is the Brexit 'opportunity,' which I personally don't believe in but who knows. Obviously less influence than being a member but still what people voted for and without crashing the economy.\n\nIf the UK gov was smart they would have invested in a marketing campaign to get this message to people over the last 2 years but they are not the brightest bunch unfortunately.\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Can anyone clarify the following: if May doesn't call MV3 next week, could the UK still crash out with No Deal on March 29th?\n",
"prompt": "As bonkers as it sounds this was the first thing that went through my mind... we end up in a schrodinger's vote situation. MV3 neither passed nor failed... What happens then?\n\nHonestly May has no shame\nSeriously. What's the bet that May refuses to call MV3 next week?",
"rejected": "Do we think Bercow will allow MV3?\n"
},
{
"Preference Direction": [
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
0.5,
1,
0.5,
0.5
],
"chosen": "Look at it this way, if for the first time on election day instead of one party polling high 30s or even 40s, rather both lead parties poll in their high 20s but getting a massively disproportionate share of seats between them, then regardless of who forms the government they are going to be hit in the face with the question of electoral reform and their mandate questioned in nearly every interview for their next 5 years.\n\nRegardless of how you vote, or whether they win or not and by doing so maybe letting in someone else through the backdoor, regardless of all that meaningful electoral reform is back on the table and it is not going away this time.\n\nGreen E&W, Green Scottish, Plaid Cymru, SNP, Independent, DUP, Sinn Fein, UKIP, Lib Dem, whatever, the closer it is to being under 30 for both (not going to happen this time but still squeaky bum time nevertheless), then the more electoral reform will dominate the next parliament.\n\nVote with your conscience.\n",
"prompt": "We just had a campaigner for the local Labour party come knock on our door to canvas our feelings and who we will be voting for. I have no issue taking the time to talk to them as welcome any party trying to gauge the thoughts and opinions of possible voters.\n\nCurrently I am wavering between Labour, Lib Dems and the Greens. However, the campaigner used this to push an argument I cannot stand.\n\nHe raised the point that only Labour have enough existing support to beat the Tories and that voting Green or Lib Dem is potentially helping the Tories win a seat. While this may be true, I cannot stand this argument. \n\nFor me, voting should not be about which party do you not want to see in power, but which you would like to. I've always been an advocate of voting for the party which best represents you even if they have little chance of ever winning a seat. \n\nThis is an argument used by every party in marginal seats, but it has put me off voting Labour here slightly. But wanted to know what other people thought of this argument and tactical voting.\n'The Greens have no chance here - only Labour can beat the Tories'",
"rejected": "I don't like tactical voting but while it's here I don't see the point of unilaterally disarming.\n\nI'd support Labour or the Greens or goddammit even the liberal democrats over Tories and everyone else who wants to scrap the NHS\n"
}
] | 19
| 1,268,022
|
"So I want to be a Pilot. I'm a combat vet, I have a general under honorable discharge, I'm 100% ser(...TRUNCATED)
| "I am currently enrolled in a commercial degree program. Haven't paid out-of-pocket for any of it, a(...TRUNCATED)
| "Find a Part 141 Flight Program at a Community College. So long as it is DEGREE Required, your Heli(...TRUNCATED)
| [0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.0,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.0,1.0,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0(...TRUNCATED)
| "This person likes education, finance.\nA detail-oriented veteran seeking to transition into aviatio(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| 11
| 482,879
|
"This thread is for simple style questions that you may have, especially those that don't warrant th(...TRUNCATED)
| "What do you do to keep moths out of your cashmere? I have an entire drawer of cashmere sweaters an(...TRUNCATED)
| "Are there any good form-fitting over the knee boots for less than $150 for people with skinny legs?(...TRUNCATED)
| [0.0,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.0,1.0,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0(...TRUNCATED)
| "This person likes fashion.\nA detail-oriented, fashion-conscious individual who values the preserva(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| 3
| 1,188,834
|
"let's say the girl is age appropriate ( around the same age as you, or at least looks that that way(...TRUNCATED)
| "I wouldn't think it's weird. Starting a conversation on the subway is weird/hard. A note sounds lik(...TRUNCATED)
| "Just \"hi\" and a phone number , I'd think weirdo/nutcase.\n\n\"Hi, it's really loud here so I wrot(...TRUNCATED)
| [1.0,0.5,0.5,0.0,1.0,1.0,0.0,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5(...TRUNCATED)
| "This person likes gourmet food, travel, entertainment.\nThis person dislikes parenting, law.\nAn op(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[0.5,0.0,0.0,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,1.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| 14
| 557,603
|
"I heard about Boehner and the Republicans of the Congress suing Obama over his executive orders pas(...TRUNCATED)
|
No? Things used to be even more vitriolic at times.
| "No, if anything it's a sign that sometimes our political system works. The president and the Speake(...TRUNCATED)
| [0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,1.0,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5(...TRUNCATED)
| "A politically engaged, but relaxed and pragmatic citizen who values stability and continuity in gov(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.0,1.0,0.5,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| 11
| 1,196,256
|
"Do you have some sort of a back up plan what you would do in a situation like this\nMen of r/childf(...TRUNCATED)
| "If I were a guy and some bitch tried to pull that shit on me, I'd dump her ass instantly and disapp(...TRUNCATED)
|
Neither do women. Abortion. If she CHOOES not to get one, that's on her, not him.
| [1.0,0.0,1.0,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5(...TRUNCATED)
| "This person dislikes parenting.\nA young male, possibly in his late teens or early twenties, who is(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.0,0.0,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| 6
| 937,995
|
"\"If it seems too good to be true, it probably is\" is a phrase that's used often. Do you feel this(...TRUNCATED)
|
I assume they're taken.
| "Actually, kind of. I dated a guy who was really really really good-looking. I found myself feeling (...TRUNCATED)
| [0.5,0.5,0.0,1.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0(...TRUNCATED)
| "A confident, young woman who values clarity and directness in her interactions. She may be pragmati(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| 4
| 715,353
|
"Watching the Lip Service on netflix as I eat a delicious bowl of fruit loops after walking two chic(...TRUNCATED)
| "I'll be in walking and holding a conversation with someone, and suddenly I'll stop responding to th(...TRUNCATED)
| "In my office I usually work with four other women who talk about what male celebrities they think a(...TRUNCATED)
| [0.5,1.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,1.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5(...TRUNCATED)
| "This person likes entertainment, humor, social sciences.\nA young, expressive lesbian who enjoys ca(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[1.0,0.5,0.5,1.0,1.0,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,1.0,0.0,0.5,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| [{"Preference Direction":[0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.0,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,1.0,0.5,0.5,0.(...TRUNCATED)
| 8
| 750,172
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 2