|
|
--- |
|
|
'[object Object]': null |
|
|
license: apache-2.0 |
|
|
datasets: |
|
|
- maryzhang/hw1-24679-image-dataset |
|
|
language: |
|
|
- en |
|
|
metrics: |
|
|
- accuracy |
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
# Model Card for {{ model_id | default("Model ID", true) }} |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. --> |
|
|
|
|
|
This is finetuned version of DistilBERT that is used for sentiment analysis on NFL news titles. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Model Details |
|
|
|
|
|
### Model Description |
|
|
|
|
|
This model uses the DistilBERT model to classify NFL news article titles as positive or negative. |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Developed by:** Devin DeCosmo |
|
|
- **Model type:** Binary Sentiment Analysis |
|
|
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English |
|
|
- **License:** MIT |
|
|
- **Finetuned from model:** DistilBERT |
|
|
|
|
|
## Uses |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. --> |
|
|
|
|
|
This is used for sentiment analysis of NFL articles, but could possibly be used for other article titles. |
|
|
|
|
|
### Direct Use |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. --> |
|
|
|
|
|
The direct use is to classify NFL articles as positive or negative. |
|
|
|
|
|
### Out-of-Scope Use |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. --> |
|
|
|
|
|
If the dataset was expanded, this could be used for sentiment analysis on other types of articles or find other features like bias towards a team or player. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. --> |
|
|
|
|
|
This is trained off a small dataset of 100 titles, this small dataset could be liable to overfitting and is not robust. |
|
|
|
|
|
### Recommendations |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. --> |
|
|
|
|
|
The small dataset size means this model is not highly generalizable. |
|
|
|
|
|
## How to Get Started with the Model |
|
|
|
|
|
Use the code below to get started with the model. |
|
|
|
|
|
## Training Details |
|
|
|
|
|
### Training Data |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. --> |
|
|
|
|
|
James-kramer/football_news |
|
|
|
|
|
This is the training dataset used. |
|
|
It consists of 100 original titles used for validation along with 1000 synthetic pieces of data from training. |
|
|
|
|
|
### Training Procedure |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. --> |
|
|
This model was trained with DistilBERT using binary classification, a training split of 80%, and 5 epochs. |
|
|
I initially used more but this converged extremely quickly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. --> |
|
|
|
|
|
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Testing Data |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. --> |
|
|
James-kramer/football_news |
|
|
The testing data was the 'original' split, the 100 original titles in this set. |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Factors |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. --> |
|
|
|
|
|
This dataset is evaluating whether the food is positive, "1", or negative, "0". |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. --> |
|
|
|
|
|
The testing metric used was accuracy to ensure the highest accuracy of the model possible. |
|
|
I also considered testing time. This small langauge model ran extremely quickly with 102 steps per second. |
|
|
|
|
|
### Results |
|
|
|
|
|
After training with the initial dataset, this model reached an accuracy of 100% in validation. |
|
|
This is likely due to the simplicity of the task, binary classification, along with distilBERT being made for tasks such as this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#### Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
This model reached a high accuracy with our current model, but this perfomance can not be confirmed to continue as the dataset was very small. |
|
|
Additional testing with more samples would be highly beneficial. |