Instructions to use elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] pipe(messages)# Load model directly from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft") model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, add_generation_prompt=True, tokenize=True, return_dict=True, return_tensors="pt", ).to(model.device) outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=40) print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[-1]:])) - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
- Local Apps
- vLLM
How to use elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft with vLLM:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install vLLM from pip: pip install vllm # Start the vLLM server: vllm serve "elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft" # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker
docker model run hf.co/elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft
- SGLang
How to use elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft with SGLang:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install SGLang from pip: pip install sglang # Start the SGLang server: python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker images
docker run --gpus all \ --shm-size 32g \ -p 30000:30000 \ -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \ --env "HF_TOKEN=<secret>" \ --ipc=host \ lmsysorg/sglang:latest \ python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }' - Docker Model Runner
How to use elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft with Docker Model Runner:
docker model run hf.co/elinas/Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft
Llama-3-13B-Instruct-ft
This is a QLoRA finetune of a merge of pre-trained language models created using mergekit.
The model is based on my passthrough merge of Llama-3-13B-Instruct
This was primarily an experiment to see how a passthrough merge will respond to further finetuning, though this was done on a small dataset.
The goal was to make a "mid" sized model like Meta has released in the past and the merge method was inspired by mlabonne's Llama-3-120B.
The model was finetuned on 8192 context length and is likely reliable using RoPE up to 32k.
It still cannot do math reliably; neither can Llama-3-8B, and in my tests only Llama-3-70B passes basic arithmetic, but it is a better storywriter/RP than Llama-3-8B from some side by side testing I conducted.
Further finetuning this model or finetuning the base model on more samples is encouraged.
Datasets
A small dataset was used to see how it affects performance. Originally I planned to do a larger dataset (196k samples), but wanted to start with a smaller one first to see how much the model improved with some additional finetuning.
Next steps would be finetuning on a larger dataset if through further testing, performance improvements are noticed.
Finetuning details
This is a QLoRA model and all modules were targeted.
lora_target_modules:
- gate_proj
- down_proj
- up_proj
- q_proj
- v_proj
- k_proj
- o_proj
lora_modules_to_save:
- embed_tokens
- lm_head
The following hyperparameters were used during training:
- learning_rate: 1e-05
- train_batch_size: 1
- eval_batch_size: 1
- seed: 42
- distributed_type: multi-GPU
- num_devices: 3
- total_train_batch_size: 3
- total_eval_batch_size: 3
- optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08
- lr_scheduler_type: cosine
- lr_scheduler_warmup_steps: 25
- num_epochs: 1
Optimizer paged_adamw_8bit and Deepspeed ZeRO 3 was used at a LR of 1e-5 using the cosine scheduler for 1 epoch on 3x3090s taking 4h 12m 13s total.
Sample packing and padding was disabled to reduce VRAM consumption significantly at the cost of speed.
W&B Run Summary
wandb: Run summary:
wandb: eval/loss 1.00774
wandb: eval/runtime 535.3847
wandb: eval/samples_per_second 0.721
wandb: eval/steps_per_second 0.241
wandb: total_flos 4167452590080.0
wandb: train/epoch 1.0
wandb: train/global_step 1157
wandb: train/grad_norm 4.50846
wandb: train/learning_rate 0.0
wandb: train/loss 1.4115
wandb: train_loss 1.00352
wandb: train_runtime 14921.1227
wandb: train_samples_per_second 0.233
wandb: train_steps_per_second 0.078
Framework versions
- PEFT 0.10.0
- Transformers 4.40.0.dev0
- Pytorch 2.3.0+cu121
- Datasets 2.15.0
- Tokenizers 0.15.0
Model Evaluation
TBD - submitted
If you have any questions or comments on the model, feel free to open a discussion in the community tab.
- Downloads last month
- 6